Biden Strengthened the Refugee Resettlement System. Will Trump Undo It?
Refugee resettlements last year hit a 30-year high, but that progress is fragile.

In FY 2024, the U.S. resettled 100,034 refugees—the highest number in 30 years and about nine times the number resettled in FY 2021. The 2024 tally is a reason to celebrate and a reminder that refugee resettlement is highly subject to presidential whims.
America's modern refugee resettlement system was established in 1980. The U.S. legally defines a refugee as someone who is living outside of his home country and can't or won't return to that country because of previous or potential persecution based on certain criteria, such as race, religion, or political opinion. The U.S. has resettled over 3 million refugees since 1980. The year-by-year level has varied dramatically due to the president's powerful role in shaping refugee admissions.
"More than in other areas of immigration, in which Congress sets caps on the number of annual visas and admissions, the president has wide latitude to determine the maximum number of refugees admitted each year (and from where), in consultation with Congress," notes an analysis by the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), a nonpartisan think tank.
Donald Trump set a lower and lower ceiling every year of his first term, and while Joe Biden promised to change course during his presidency, that proved difficult. Until FY 2024, the total number of refugees admitted to the country was far lower than the ceiling Biden set, in large part because Trump-era policies hobbled the resettlement infrastructure.
Several factors contributed to the 2024 rebound. In addition to increased funding, technological modernization (i.e., conducting video interviews rather than in-person ones and digitizing case materials) improved government agencies' capacity to interview and process applicants. The MPI explains that "concurrent processing," which enables multiple steps such as medical checks and security screening to happen simultaneously, has shortened screening times dramatically.
Bigger-picture changes helped too. The Biden administration rolled out Safe Mobility Offices across Latin America, which aim to provide locals with information about migration pathways, including refugee admissions. Another initiative, the Welcome Corps, allows U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to privately sponsor refugees, building resettlement capacity and reducing the government's financial and logistical burdens.
According to the United Nations, there were 43.4 million refugees around the world in 2024—a number that has tripled over the past 10 years. The U.S. is in a position to help, and refugees help the U.S. in return. In addition to enriching and revitalizing communities, refugees start businesses at a disproportionately high rate and contribute billions in tax dollars to federal, state, and local coffers.
Improvements to the resettlement system are easy for a future administration to undo, and with Trump returning to the White House, refugee admissions are likely to fall. It's not yet clear which changes Trump will impose or how deeply they will affect people seeking protection, but it would be a mistake for America to abandon its opportunity to welcome refugees and benefit from their presence.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The Fragile U.S. Refugee Resettlement System."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why is it a good thing to take on a bunch of charity cases? Make the libertarian argument for it. Refugees are granted a bunch of government aid in contrast to illegal immigrants who aren't supposed to do so. Even if you ignore the fact that most of these people are ineligible for refugee status based on international rules there is no reason to assume bringing more in is good for the US.
I need a good explanation for why it is always a positive thing to bring in non-Americans. Further, why is it good that taxpayers have to pay for these people and further compete with them for resources?
Mass immigration is cultural suicide. You're not going to create Libertopia by giving the commies more allies and replacing natives.
I need a good explanation for why it is always a positive thing to bring in new-born baby Americans. Immigrants? The vast majority of them can very rapidly go to work, producing goods and services for willing buyers. Newborns? PARASITES for a decade and more; SNOT cuntributing to the Sacred Collective Hive! Sucking down the collective's mommy-tit-milk, diapers, food, schooling, medical care, etc., and SNOT paying back for a LONG time!!!
Send these mooches BACK up the collectively birth canals from whence they came!!! The Hive MUST give them the heave!!!
You didn't make the libertarian argument for the government giving large amounts of charity to refugee claimants.
And your analogy is terrible. Babies are taken care by their parents, not the US government. Are you seriously trying to say that the American government is the refugee claimants parent? If so, that's the opposite of libertarian.
All of you haters, hate on the sub-humans, even when private funds from private donors help them out. You haters even HATE it when they want to WORK for a living, and support themselves! Meanwhile, fruits and veggies rot in the fields, for lack of hard-working native-born workers. Yet ye just keep RIGHT on RIGHTEOUSLY hating!!!
9-TIMES the refugee immigration and the fruits and veggies rot in the fields, for lack of hard-working???
LOL.. Point fails.
Government Almighty, largely at the behest of HATEFUL sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds, REFUSES to give Sacred Government Almighty Spermission to the illegal sub-humans, to work!!! Hire some, and let Government Almighty know that ye did that, and see twat happens to YE!
WHY is shit ILLEGAL to WORK, and HOW to we expect our economy to prosper with such UDDERLY stupid, anti-productivity laws?
Does it take the entire population of the world to harvest the fruits and veggies in the USA? If so; then apparently we must be too productive.
Would the entire population of the world move here if USA Government Almighty got out of the way? Do you REALLY believe that? How would they pay their travel fees to get here, if they are dirt-poor, anyway? When we had travel freedoms here in the USA many decades ago, did EVERYONE from Europe come here?
Squirrel. Still nuts.
"even when private funds from private donors help them out."
But it's not private funds from private donors, you fucking liar. And I know that you know this.
It's hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. Right now the federal and state governments are giving them free transportation, free food, free housing, free healthcare, free clothing, free phones, free internet and on top of all that another $2000/mo in spending money.
Not a drop of that is "private funds from private donors". Every bit is taxpayer dollars.
What would M.Scott Peck say about you now, fibber?
Sarc/sqrsly knows this. They are pathalogical lying shit weasels though.
https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigration/border-coverage/ngos-american-tax-dollars-migrants/
https://cis.org/Bensman/Biden-Admin-Sends-Millions-Religious-Nonprofits-Facilitating-Mass-Illegal-Migration
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/explained-what-can-illegal-immigrants-get-free-united-states
https://www.borderreport.com/immigration/migrant-centers/ngos-that-helped-house-and-feed-migrants-receive-millions-from-fema/
They truly are lying open borders leftists.
Much much more than that. The despot trafficking cartels (aka the UN) revolution includes destruction of every major city infrastructure in the country. Total fucking destruction. Barbarism
And this is the damn NYT. An unreported media coverup that has infrastructures collapsing
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/09/us/copper-theft-heavy-metal.html
One of the resident goofs will be around to tell us the Times is right wing.
Did they donate to ActBlue?
"Not a drop of that is "private funds from private donors". Every bit is taxpayer dollars."
From sources across the web
International Rescue Committee
American Immigration Council
Catholic Charities USA
HIAS
Immigrant Defense Project
American Civil Liberties Union
Global Refuge
National Immigration Forum
National Immigration Law Center
Ethiopian community Development Council
VERY simple Google search finds TEN such private orgs!!! Why does PervFected You LIE soooo much, PervFect Servant and Serpent of the Evil One?
NO.
You're the fucking liar. Not one of those groups is supplying those government programs I mentioned.
Right now the federal and state governments are giving them free transportation, free food, free housing, free healthcare, free clothing, free phones, free internet and on top of all that another $2000/mo in spending money.
They're running their own programs unrelatedly. But I know that you knew that.
"All of you haters, hate on the sub-humans, even when private funds from private donors help them out."
That's what I wrote, and it is TRUE! A VERY simple Google search found TEN private organizations that SPEND THE MONEY OF VOLUNTARY GIVERS in order to HELP, and snot to HATE, immigrants!
Hey PervFected Servant and Serpent of the Evil One... AKA Murderer's Lament (Suicide Farmer)...
Do You PervFectly even have a CLUE ass to twat it means to HELP instead of to HATE?
Decent (charitable, non-tribalistic) people make YOU look PervFectly bad... That's why You PervFectly hate decent people! You Jesus-killer, Gandhi-killer, MLK-Jr.-killer You!
That moment when you lose the debate.
Yeah, I know, everyone except for PervFected Rick James (and a very, VERY few Rick James clones who think and stink just EXACTLY like Rick James) have ALL lost the debates!!!
Rick James HAS SPOKEN!!! All peons everywhere HAIL Rick James!!!
No, shit's snot very libertarian of Government Almighty to make my charity choices for me (instead of letting me make them for myself).
Shit is even LESS libertarian of Government Almighty (AND their hate-filled supporters) to say, "You, you, you, and you? You've kissed my ass in just the RIGHT way, so YOU have My Sacred Permission to WORK an honest job for honest pay. You, you, you, and you OTHERS? You've SNOT kissed my ass in just the PervFectly RIGHT way, so YOU are SNOT ALLOWED TO WORK!!!"
I missed the part where the US government was telling illegal immigrants they couldn't work in their own nation.
If they work in their own nation, the USA will slap YUUUUGE tariffs on the products of their labors, to PROTECT the GOOD American ferriner-haters!!!!
Go back to Africa, ye invasive species ye!!!!
Domestic Taxes 80%.
Import Tariffs 10%.
Your point fails again unless it was a point that immigrants would be better off tax wise working in their own nation and exporting their labors.
And where's your idiot friend sarc to mega-horn that Trump is an idiot because foreigners don't pay Tariffs, US citizens do. Are you actually packing water for Trump now?
And this is exactly what is wrong in-the-brain with all Leftards. You don't reason. You aren't trustworthy. You aren't honorable. You are all about what YOU want and bend, lie, scam, cheat however you can to get it.
Domestic Taxes 80%.
Import Tariffs 10%.
Citations fell off!!!! And twat does Dear Leader want to set the NEW tariffs at? The more taxes, the better, "small government" cuntsorevaturds?
Well unless Tariffs are 80% you point FAILS again.
You have no point to make.
You just want to mega-horn entitlement to other people's greener-pastures.
Typical Leftard criminal mindset.
ML, don't argue with a gray box.
Sorry. I know I shouldn't but I sometimes get my kicks from mocking the idiots and the insane.
Like a kid kicking an anthill.
I'd say it's better to attempt to disarm/inform the ignorant "gray box" than to end up in a Civil War with the "gray box".
The creature in the grey box likely has type 2 diabetes and weighs 300 pounds,He ain’t fighting anyone.
Better we should track it down and euthanize it. It’s almost certainly rabid, among other things.
I have no problems with resettling refugees -- if they come of their own free will, and are responsible for themselves.
Refugee resettlements of the recent kind are nothing of the sort.
* How much do these refugees know about where the US government plans to resettle them? If they were coming to stay with family and friends, both parties have skin in the game -- the sponsors won't support people who wouldn't fit in, and the refugees will have better expectations of the new culture.
* How much welfare is the US government handing out? Sponsors won't support bums and criminals, but the US government doesn't care, and foreign governments are delighted to get rid of their own bums and criminals.
* The US legal system is designed to be as obstructive and inflexible as possible, as evidenced by occupational licensing, minimum wages, zoning, building codes, and countless other examples. Dumping thousands of so-called refugees anywhere in the country, without the locals having any say and without the local economy having any legal way to adjust to the sudden influx, such as building new housing or allowing the refugees to work for a living, is guaranteed to destroy communities.
Stop jiving us, Fiona. Stop pretending there are no consequences to government-induced immigration which benefits only corrupt politicians and bureaucrats.
" Stop pretending there are no consequences to government-induced immigration which benefits only corrupt politicians and bureaucrats."
And Koch Industries.
"Hey, do you want to pay $5 a pound for tomatoes?" Say the people who pay $5 a pound for tomatoes at the Greenwich Village fair-trade farmer's market and abortion clinic.
I assume heirloom tomatoes and artisan abortions.
Only organic herbal abortions.
If You PervFectly dislike Koch Industries, then don't buy shit from them! Butt get out of my way if I want to buy from them!
Also please do SNOT allow Your PervFect Hatred to stand in my way if I want to buy goods or services from the illegal sub-humans!
(I am staying out of YOUR PervFect Way; when will YOU stay out of MY way?)
How about you stop stealing my taxes to pay for your subsidized immigrants?
How about you stop stealing my taxes to pay for your over-paid, parasitical Government Almighty goons who PUNISH farmers, construction firms, restaurants, and others who want to hire willing workers?
...because of-course.
ONLY immigrants are "willing workers". /s
Yet over half 51% get on welfare & ~2/3rds want more (31% for natives).
Is it really any wonder 'what' most are trying to escape?
Their self-made sh*t pie of a nation.
If they're such a blessing then why isn't their own nation such a blessing to live in?
Of the immigrants who took hand-outs of ANY kind, private OR pubic, 99.735% of them TRIED to work, butt Butt-Hole Government Almighty would SNOT-SNIT ALLOW them to work!
Sounds a lot like DEMANDING a job.
They handed in their resume ... Will the immigration office accept their employment within this nation?
They can work in their own nation all they want; they just can't have 'this' USA job without an invite.
Cry me those tears of self-entitlement.
Predictably. A personal trait no-one wants to employ in the first place.
Again, much of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade was the result of intra- and inter-continental conflict. Many of the slaves were far more qualified as refugees than the people we grant refugee status to now, even being explicitly identified as prisoners of war as the result of conflicts European and American and Middle Eastern powers started for fomented.
There's certainly a case to be made that, e.g., the families of persecuted political leaders should be protected as refugees and, potentially, that extreme and conspicuous minority and/or non-violent sects be granted some sort of preferred and/or specialized status.
However, at some point, accepting broad swaths of people, anyone and everyone a regime can designate as their enemies and drive from their country or continent, you're terrorizing and/or enslaving your own populace and aiding tyrants and authoritarians. Especially if the conception of immigration or refugee status passes from simply, passively not rounding them up and returning them to where they came from, to actively encouraging them to cross through friendly nations and subsidizing their relocation and housing.
Economics may not be a zero-sum game but population dynamics is. Burke, or Mill, said "All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Sitting by while people flee tyrants is doing nothing. Especially if you yourself aren't opening up your own home or directly opposing the evil or tyranny yourself. You don't have to confront the evil directly or personally, but if you aren't also personally aiding the refugees directly, you're just creating an illusion or deception that you are confronting evil and/or doing good. To wit, again, you don't have to do anything one way or the other with regard to any given tyrant or refugee, but doing nothing under the guise of doing good or right is neither moral nor libertarian. Much less so using the State to support or scapegoat your illusion/deceptions.
As one of the great libertarian philosophers said:
"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs"
Taxes to support indigent foreign public charges are the price we pay for a diverse civilization.
I suppose taking refugees is nice and humanitarian and everything. Forcing people to pay for them is not. Maybe allow for refugees to get legal residence if some person or private group wants to sponsor them and bear the resettlement costs.
I also don't really see any moral obligation to take refugees unless the US created the situations they escaped from.
Will Trump Undo It?
We can only hope, but Trump has a problem with staying on task.
100% true. Also 100% true that this is the single biggest reason he was elected. Both times.
More like, Trump, on task or off, will never promote the woke-progressive-DNC agenda.
"but Trump has a problem with staying on task"
Definitely, but I think that the people he's surrounded himself with this time will help keep him focused.
Also, last time the GOPe were doing their best to distract and bamboozle him. They won't be allowed to this time.
‘1) Business manager, AKA greedy capitalist: “I do SNOT wanna hire this young lady with the gross, giant tattoos all over her body AND head, with oodles of body piercings and green hair to boot! I live in a small, conservative town, and I am afraid of losing customers! Government Almighty, In Your Good Graces, am I allowed to SNOT hire her?”
Government Almighty Selfless Pubic Servant: “No, you biased, selfish, hateful, GREEDY capitalist! Show some cumpassion, and HIRE her! You MUST! Else you’re busted, I’m disgusted, and ye can’t be trusted!”
‘2) Business manager, AKA greedy capitalist: “I do SNOT wanna hire this young him-her-zer-they-them with the gross, giant sex-change and species-change synthetic organs! I live in a small, conservative town, and I am afraid of losing customers! Government Almighty, In Your Good Graces, am I allowed to SNOT hire him-her-zer-they-them?”
Government Almighty Selfless Pubic Servant: “No, you biased, selfish, hateful, GREEDY capitalist! Show some cumpassion, and HIRE him-her-zer-they-them! You MUST! Else you’re busted, I’m disgusted, and ye can’t be trusted! STOP being SOOO hateful!!!”
‘3) Business manager, AKA greedy capitalist: “I do SNOT wanna hire this BLIND trucker-wannabe! I live in a place where MANY people have cummon sense, and I fear endless lawsuits after blind-trucker-caused crashes! Government Almighty, In Your Good Graces, am I allowed to SNOT hire him?”
Government Almighty Selfless Pubic Servant: “No, you biased, selfish, hateful, GREEDY capitalist! Show some cumpassion, and HIRE him! You MUST! Else you’re busted, I’m disgusted, and ye can’t be trusted! STOP being SOOO hateful!!!
“Besides, make some reasonable accommodations! Have his ‘trucker’ job be a desk job, filling out forms for the actual, LITERAL truck drivers. We Faithful Pubic Servants and Serpents can help! We can invent endless NEW forms for your blind ‘truck driver’ to fill out!”
‘4) Business manager, AKA greedy capitalist: “I DO wanna hire this hardworking paperless illegal sub-human who looks respectable and is willing to work long hours for me, and is willing to accept the pay that I can afford to pay, and still stay in business. Government Almighty, In Your Good Graces, am I allowed to hire him?”
Government Almighty Selfless Pubic Servant: “No, you biased, selfish, hateful, GREEDY capitalist! Do SNOT HIRE him! You MUST SNOT! Else you’re busted, I’m disgusted, and ye can’t be trusted! STOP being insufficiently hateful!!!
“All of the GOOD red-blooded Americans HATE the illegal sub-humans, and here YOU are, being unbiased, unprejudiced, open-minded, broad-minded, tolerant, and SNOT sufficiently hateful!!! We can SNOT tolerate your WRONG tolerance!!!”
Hey you sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds… If you can see the ridiculous silliness of the first three “woke” power-pig cases, then WHY can ye SNOT see YOUR own power piggishness, in case #4?
If you can't address what people actually say, then fuck off. Enough with your retard Heckler's Veto attempts.
The above TRUTH shows Ye PervFectly sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds to be the small-minded power pigs (slurping at the power-pig slop trough of Government Almighty) that Ye PervFectly are... And Ye PervFectly write NOTHING to refute it! Just empty-headed EVIL and STUPID insults! That's ALL that You PervFectly have, in this case! Empty-headed Wonder Child!
PS, if Trump and the Trumpanzees are SNOT gonna take away the OLD bullshit, is shit just WAAAAY to much to ask them (and YOU!) to SNOT add yet MORE bullshit to the OLD bullshit?
PS, if Trump and the Trumpanzees are SNOT gonna take away the OLD bullshit, is shit just WAAAAY too much to ask them (and YOU!) to SNOT add yet MORE bullshit to the OLD bullshit? Shit sure seems that way!
The U.S. legally defines a refugee as someone who is living outside of his home country and can't or won't return to that country because of previous or potential persecution based on certain criteria, such as race, religion, or political opinion.
As long as none of them passed through a safe harbor on their way to the United States, as long as not a penny of government money is spent rescuing them, and as long as they show gratitude by diving head-first into the melting pot, I am willing to listen to an argument in favor of resettlement. Otherwise we have no moral obligation to accept refugees from a country their fellow nationals are unwilling to fix, or to be the world's dumping ground for inconvenient citizens.
Not just inconvenient, but often uncooperative, destructive, and anti-American.
I'm all for returning to the system of 19 immigrants living in a one room slum apartment with no running water, and an immigration official that says, "Welcome to America, good luck finding work and try not to die of consumption". But we're never going back to that.
Even that would result in excessive immigration of undesirables. Sharing a slum apartment in America with 18 immigrants, with the possibility of finding employment, would still be a better life than a billion people in shithole countries have.
Sharing a slum apartment in America with 18 immigrants, with the possibility of finding employment, would still be a better life than a billion people in shithole countries have.
I'm not convinced of that... overall. The Great Irish Potato Famine isn't happening in China, Mexico or Venezuela or El Salvador.
But famine is on the verge of happening in Congo, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Sudan, Somalia, Haiti...I could go on. Yeah, that apartment with 18 roommates and the toilet down the hall would look pretty good to hundreds of millions.
I keep hearing and seeing about how Jesus was a refugee. I also hear that healthcare is a human right, that the US healthcare system is among the worst and most expensive because it tries harder than any other to save infants, and I don't think I've ever heard or will hear, "Welcome to America, you can bed down with the horses out in the barn."
"As long as none of them passed through a safe harbor on their way to the United States"
None of them came from North America. Unless they swam across an ocean, they all passed through a safe harbor.
The cost per refugee to American taxpayers just under $79,600 in the first five years after a refugee is resettled in the U.S.;
In 2016, the State Department spent nearly $545 million to process and resettle refugees, including $140,389,177 on transportation costs;
Of the $1.8 billion in resettlement costs, $867 million was spent on welfare alone;
In their first five years, approximately 54 percent of all refugees will hold jobs that pay less than $11 an hour;
$71 million will be spent to educate refugees and asylum-seekers, a majority of which will be paid by state and local governments.
Over five years, an estimated 15.7 percent of all refugees will need housing assistance, which is roughly $7,600 per household in 2014 dollars
https://www.fairus.org/issue/fiscal-cost-resettling-refugees-united-states
That's impossible. The media, Reason included, constantly tell us that those experiencing illegal refugeedom pay more in taxes than they extract. And they wouldn't lie about that...or the mental fitness of a sitting president...or the effectiveness of masks and vaccines...or the equal blame for the federal deficit.
You have to factor in the values of food trucks, cheap nannies and groundskeepers, and international gang wars.
You had me at "food trucks."
Definitely worth all the crime.
The crimes of crossing Magic Lines in the Sands?
Please show us, on the doll, where the magic-line-crossers touched you, in a bad way?
https://www.fairus.org/about-fair
What an unbiased source of information that
honestly gives both the pros and cons in order to let people make an informed decisiondishonestly gives only half of the picture in order to promote an anti-immigrant agenda and give ammunition to hateful liars like Jesse.Now compare that to the article that says "In FY 2024, the U.S. resettled 100,034 refugees" and something doesn't add up.
Well I'm not a rocket scientist but I think there might be a difference between a 'refugee immigrant' and just any 'legal immigrant'.
I'm not a rocket scientist
Thank God.
I think there might be a difference between a 'refugee immigrant' and just any 'legal immigrant'.
Refugees are by definition legal because 'refugee' is a legal status.
Only if they are truly refugees.
It's kind of amazing how 99% of the US's refugee claimants aren't from Syria, or Ukraine, or North Korea, or Cuba, or Myanmar, or Yemen, or Afghanistan.
The war must be mighty rough in Mexico and El Salvador right now.
LOL. Well, there are more warlords in Mexico than in those other countries. But sarcasm taken.
Refugees are legal if, and only if, the host country agrees to accept them, and the refugees comply with any laws the host country establishes, including immigration.
Yes. Until they are approved as refugees they are asylum seekers. And still legal.
You are not permitted to forum shop your asylum claim.
You go to your first country.
If you are forum shopping for asylum, it is an automatic no.
I agree. Biden screwed up when he allowed them to wait here.
And the results were the Democrat’s planned intent.
The only laws and "norms" sarcasmic accepts are ones to be used against his enemies. Same with cops.
20 years for daring to enter a public building. 800+ who committed no damage or violence. All good. Anything against Trump, all good.
But any attacks on illegals or democrats is Hitler nazi bullshit according to sarc.
Are all 'legal immigrants' 'refugees'?
Not sure if you're really this obtuse or just playing dumb.
hut hum - recap here.
"Reducing legal immigration levels from well over one million" ... "Now compare that to the article that says 'In FY 2024, the U.S. resettled 100,034 refugees' and something doesn't add up. "
That’s not at all what I said
Is that not a direct quote of your post?
It’s a Jesse-level misinterpretation.
Direct quotes of your posts are not misinterpretation, dipshit.
I guess I don’t understand what doesn’t add up in your mind?
“Mind”.
It all males complete sense when you realize he is a pathaloogical liar about everything. That's his one true principle.
Contradicts himself in the same threads. Lies about what he says in the same threads.
He is about 4 or 5 posts from screaming racists and xenophobes.
Almost none of the ones that come here are refugees. They’re just illegals, and your democrat masters are breaking the law to let them in here.
But you know that. You’re just a lying shitweasel, and a worthless drunk.
Yes. The Fionas count anyone claiming to be a refugee as a refugee. Most of their claims are specious. That's why they will vanish before their hearings.
Trump will likely take a wrecking ball to the whole bunch of Biden bullshit. The question is, how much traction will leftists like Fiona get when they abusively use the courts to block Trump from enforcing existing laws?
We have millions who have already had their day in court and are under deportation orders or have exhausted the process. Trump can start there and make a big difference.
Very true. Might as well get the low hanging fruit out of the way.
The open border Marxists subsist on dishonest arguments. They can never argue a benefit with actual data, why they subsist on models that assume a benefit if they ever make an actual argument.
Jeff did this a few months back too. He kept linking to old Brookings models that ignored actual costs we could measure with ephemeral benefits from their models that assumed a benefit. And even then it was after 20 years they were a slight yearly economic positive. Of course they'd never recoup the costs for the first 20 years.
Sarc is just another open borders Marxist. Facts and evidence don't matter to him. Just narratives.
Oh look. Jesse is accusing me of making dishonest arguments while he makes a dishonest argument. Accusing others of what he is doing while he is doing it. The hypocrisy hunter is a hypocrite. Must be a day that ends in 'y'.
No, he's got you dead to rights, you fucking troll.
Jesse is spot on. You’re a lying Marxist cunt. Just go back to drinking yourself to death.
Poor sarc. He’s got nothing, so he starts flailing about.
The U.S. legally defines a refugee as someone who is living outside of his home country and can't or won't return to that country because of previous or potential persecution based on certain criteria, such as race, religion, or political opinion.
If there is no expectation that they will return home (at any point), then this is just another excuse to replace the grungy natives with a populace that is animated by fear.
The feature, not a bug.
It's working for the UK, right?
Gang raping the kids Britain's wont rape.
Germany is also experiencing the positives with all their refugees.
Germany deserves everything they get. They've been on the wrong side of everything ever.
I kind of like how they taught the Romans a thing or two at Teutoburg Forest.
Germany isn’t a person.
You're not a person! LOL
"Gang raping the kids Britain's wont rape"
The tragedy of all those awful Chav kids running around unfucked. How are the upper classes going to keep the English serfs in their place now?
Raping kids used to be organized and efficient in the British boarding schools.
"The immigrants aren't queuing up properly!" makes sense.
Hopefully trump will continue to resettle the "refugees" back to where they came from
I would prefer he ship them the sanctimonious countries of the world instead. Canada would be the cheapest, but then they will probably just sneak back across that broken border, because Canada fucking sucks. So I would settle for Australia or Scotland, among others. I'd love to see how they square "speech is violence" and "restorative justice" with a few million new citizens-of-the-world who have a 3rd grade education and a rap sheet longer than their arm. I would also like to see their all-white, all-native, socialist utopias collapse in under a year as they start contributing to the third world's tab that the U.S. has been covering for the last hundred years.
You haven't been hearing about the grooming gang controversy there have you?
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/03/why-anger-over-grooming-gangs-has-reached-boiling-point/
Oh yeah, I know. One of you turned me on to Spiked when Reason became a (bigger) joke. And I intentionally left England off my list because they are in a mad-as-hell moment there as well. But Scotland, and to a slightly lesser degree Ireland, are their Canadas. Way further left, way more government suppression, cold AF, and generally quite insufferable.
The citizens of England have before and are now fighting against their tyrannical government. The Scots and Irish are only willing to fight against England (or the U.S.).
Canada isn't the Canada you're imagining. That Canada is a creation of US progressives trying to create a fantasy land to point to and browbeat regular Americans with.
Trudeau never got more than 33% of the vote, and has been running minority governments. In the last two elections the Conservatives had higher vote totals than the Liberals.
Remember the Canadian trucker protests? New Yorkers and Californians never did that over Covid overreach. That anger hasn't gone away in Canada.
Trudeau has been polling the last year at single digits. He is currently the most hated Prime Minister ever. And the numbers on that are not even close. There has never been a PM so outright loathed as him.
Whereas even if you account for the fraud factor, even Commie Cackles got at least 45% of the vote in the US.
If an election was held today the Conservatives under Poilievre will get 55% of the vote, and that's expected to go over 60% by the time of the election. The Liberals will be wiped off the map.
Fiona is a shrill, open borders obsessed moron. She must be angling to be a bigger idiot than Shitty Shikha.
At the very least, send them to the places that claim to care so much about helping them.
'Biden Strengthened the Refugee Resettlement System.'
Does resettlement include Koch Industry factory dorms? Asking for most Reason commenters.
Maybe sarc and jeffy will resettle there.
I haven't seen anything from jeffy in a while. Pour sarc has been carrying his load all by hisself.
He was snuggling up to shrikes feet yesterday.
Good thing sarc doesn’t spend much time here anymore .
I know right. Would be an embarrassing admittance to claim he isn't a pathalogical liar if says he is rarely here and he is still here multiple times a day. Would prove he will lie about literally anything.
Who's Sarc? Never heard of him. He mustn't ever come here.
You guys make more comments about me than I make myself.
Nothing to be proud of.
I’ve never come across anyone on the internet in my entire life who’s more fun to mock than you.
It's the baiting which fascinates me. A shipmate in the Navy was easier to bait, but he knew he was being baited and thought he had to put up with. Sarc is the most unaware baiting target I have ever met. You can get him going for hours.
30+ years of drugs and alcohol have killed any and all self awareness he had, if he had any.
You’re universally an object of scorn and derision
On another note, I have to post this again today:
"Biden Awards Medal of Freedom to Hillary Clinton, George Soros and Others"
BTW, "others" includes gender-confused hero Bill Nye.
WTF! (x 100)
We all can't be heros. You have to donate to the DNC and push leftist beliefs to be one.
We can all be Heroes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTzcaEpvQec
Hungary was right to strip him of citizenship.
Joe Biden was a Hungarian citizen? Is there no end to his lies?!?!?
The world would be a much better off they stripped he and his sons of their lives. Which should happen now. Maybe Mossad can liquidate the entire Soros clan.
If Mossad did that, they would be anti-Semitic, as are all anti-Soros folks.
So….. Misek would approve?
And this woman:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXXxAkxIIFQ
Are you a biologist?
She "identifies" as a retard.
On the general subject of refuge and asylum laws, all of them are based on the abolishment of "statelessness". Unavoidably, this means that people aren't citizens, but subjects.
Given Reason's occasional dipping of it's toes into doctrinal libertarianism, why would they defend not being counted by a state as a negative? Shouldn't you fuckers be for statelessness?
Statelessness is a fantasy. To paraphrase Madison, if we were angels, we would not need states. But when anti-freedom people gather in mass to, er, oppress others, we need borders to keep them out.
But when anti-freedom people gather in mass to, er, oppress others, we
need borders to keep them outcall it government.ftfy
...And is precisely why more should care about 75%+ of Immigrants voting for the [Na]tional So[zi]alist party so they can continue to milk the cow at a 51% rate.
What-ever the entirety immigration law is; It is FAILING big time at keeping treasonous traitors out.
What's your point? Do governments need borders? Or is this some sort of nebulous system where bands of people just roam around?
That anti-freedom people control government and oppress others because anti-freedom people vote for them and their promises to oppress others.
Translate that to human please.
"Derp"
My point being that our laws are founded on white savior complex. And even though libertarians may feel sorry for whoever, the legal justification is to end statelessness, which this rag should reject.
>Will Trump Undo It?
Hopefully.
No one has yet been able to explain why the US is the country that needs to take in everyone from all over the world. Why the ME doesn't need to take care of Palestinians, why the US should accept everyone coming from south of Mexico, etc.
Are you daft? There's a poem on the bottom of the Statue of Liberty. We are therefore required to accept 10 million gang rapists per year in perpetuity. Read the fucking 96th Amendment, genius. "All national policy must be based on poems unless expressly granted to living-history biopics." I'm surrounded by idiots.
There's a poem on the bottom of the Statue of Liberty.
Nobody realized France sent a Trojan horse.
The poem should be removed.
Sure, but remove the illegals FIRST. Pretty sure the poem isn't going to gang rape anyone.
>The Biden administration rolled out Safe Mobility Offices across Latin America, which aim to provide locals with information about migration pathways, including refugee admissions. Another initiative, the Welcome Corps, allows U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to privately sponsor refugees, building resettlement capacity and reducing the government's financial and logistical burdens.
In other words, taxpayers have been forced to pay for quango NGO's to ship illegal immigrants up north and across the border.
"In FY 2024, the U.S. resettled 100,034 refugees—the highest number in 30 years and about nine times the number resettled in FY 2021"
The US is not the dumping ground for the world. Send them elsewhere, not here.
Reason idiocy on immigration....
"Their not really refugees of their self-made sh*t pie of a nation...."
"They're really just trying to get here to ?help? the USA."
Yeah man... /s When I'm fixing a widget I always pick-up *all* the parts from an already broken down widget. That way I know It'll get it fixed and can celebrate. /s
Maybe more of us would be fine with immigration when statistics shows an 80% US patriotic immigration mentality (working-parts) versus the ~80% Socialist mentality (broken) it shows today.
The socialist pro despot economics blogs I lurk, believe, 100percent, they can save MENA with a welfare state and rationing for all (except them) that ends up with currency collapse and finally, a one world government!!! (Britain is starting to resemble Brittanica after the colony fell from Rome- bands of imported barbarism)
Trump should leave the United Nations, demolish the building in NYC and build a Trump tower.
Building a Trump Tower on the site of the UN would be the greatest troll in the history of trolls.
almost as good as allowing a mosque at the 9/11 site
[no Bothans would be killed in the building of a Trump Tower]
The thing is never the thing. The thing is always the revolution.
Britain is starting to resemble Brittanica after the colony fell from Rome- bands of imported barbarism
Which is the foundation of our language and culture.
Britain was Neanderthal, replaced by Sapien hunter-gatherers, largely replaced by Anotolian farmers, mostly replaced by Celtic Britons, who were heavily diluted with Germanic Agles, Jutes, Saxons and Vikings. We're just seeing a snapshot in an ever changing population.
Not that this changes your point; just a deep thought. Here's some more:
A child’s face can say a lot- especially the mouth part of the face.
It’s sad that a family can be torn apart by something as simple as wild dogs.
If I ever get real rich, I hope I'm not real mean to poor people, like I am now.
I hope if dogs ever take over the world, and they chose a king, they don't just go by size, because I bet there are some Chihuahuas with some good ideas.
-Jack Handey
How did accepting Palestinian refugees work out for Lebanon?
They had to sacrifice a lot of territory to ghettoize them.
Biden is trying to start a war with a major power in the last days of his presidency... will Trump undo it?
Hey Sullum, how are those esoteric federal crime numbers workin' out for ya?!!
Soros should wear his medal when he's hanged.
I guarantee you that most refugees do not pay taxes, and many who don’t pay that much when deductions and other forms of aid are concerned. Most Americans aren’t net plus on paying taxes. A small majority pays like half of all taxes.
Reason is employing the same logical fallacy used in pushing college education. It doesn’t matter that the “average” earning of ba holder is 500 thousand dollars. Most college degree holders don’t sniff that amount. Do you really think refugees who escaped the crapholes of their own making are future millionaires by the thousands?
Many of them could find success. But the amount of money we spent on them goes far more than housing and medical care, and would apply even more to those who fail.
The UK government budget office just "discovered" that most refugees and immigrants cost the UK taxpayer, on average (if I recall the report) around 400k-700k pounds over their lifetime.
While I fully understand that our country and its rules are different from the UK, our welfare system is much closer to the English welfare system than at any time in history-- and most politicians and public officials have the pedal pressed to the floor to make it even more like England's (and Europe's).
Apparently the essence of lubbertarianism is digging out anodyne and misdirecting labels for nefarious behavior -- refugees for illegal aliens, sex workers for prostitutes, and so on and so forth. The Ministry of Truth salutes you!
Hey look, I just identified as a refugee! Where are my freebies, you cheapo Americanos?
Seattle Times does 180, decides rule-breaking in public spaces is no longer a revolutionary act of social justice.
So, young urban "progressives" are self-centered, entitled, and irresponsible. Who knew?
My Hispanic college students would vociferously disagree with you.
Sure, they want nice families to be able to come here. But not at the cost of coming here with Tren de Aragua and pimps and drug dealers and terrorists. This is a dishonest article.
Even in the 13th Century this was settled :
"the manner of dealing with immigration is determined by law in the cases of both beneficial and “hostile” immigration. The State has the right and duty to apply its law."
"“The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people.”"
"Immigration should have as its goal integration, not disintegration or segregation. The immigrant should not only desire to assume the benefits but the responsibilities of joining into the full fellowship of the nation. By becoming a citizen, a person becomes part of a broad family over the long term and not a shareholder in a joint stock company seeking only short-term self-interest."
"immigration must have in mind the common good; it cannot destroy or overwhelm a nation.
This explains why so many Americans experience uneasiness caused by massive and disproportional immigration. Such policy artificially introduces a situation that destroys common points of unity and overwhelms the ability of a society to absorb new elements organically into a unified culture. The common good is no longer considered."
This is a dishonest article.
Are you new here? All Fiona's articles are this same bullshit.
Most refugees who come to the US live a long way from here. It makes more sense to temporarily resettle them close to their home countries to facilitate their return home. It would make a lot more economic sense to put them in those countries, and not fly them thousands of miles (at taxpayer's expense) to here.
"Refugee resettlements last year hit a 30-year high, but that progress is fragile."
Progress!?!? BS!!
But Fiona! They're eating the dogs! They're eating the cats! They're EATING the PETS of the people who live there!
How many "refugees" did you take in, Fiona?