Bible Back in Texas Schools After Being Pulled for Sexual Content
Canyon Independent School District pulled sections of the Bible from its library shelves over concerns that its "sexually explicit" material violated Texas law.

Is the Bible too "sexually explicit" for minors? The Canyon Independent School District in Texas was apparently concerned that it might be. The district pulled the Bible from school library shelves earlier this month as part of a review of potentially "sexually explicit material."
According to Superintendent Darryl Flusche, the district was worried about running afoul of a new Texas law known as the Restricting Explicit and Adult-Designated Educational Resources (READER) Act, or House Bill 900.
"House Bill 900, which passed during the last legislative session, establishes library standards that restrict content in school libraries," Flusche wrote in a leaked email to parents, citing the section of the law defining sexually explicit material (that which "describes, depicts, or portrays sexual conduct"). "This standard for library content prohibits books that have one instance of sexual content" that meets the definition.
As a result, "numerous books, including the full text of the Bible," were verboten in school libraries, Flusche continued, pointing out that portions of the Bible were still available to students. "We are more than willing to assist a student who would like access to a Bible by arranging this from one of our partnering churches," he added. Flusche also asked parents to "share their voice with the legislators concerning HB900."
Did Flusche really feel that stocking the Bible violated Texas law? Or is he simply trying to make a point about the broadness and potential unintended consequences of the READER Act?
Either way, he has the wrong idea, according to the Texas state Rep. Jared Patterson (R–Denton), who sponsored the bill.
"Let me be very clear: the Bible, and other religious texts, are protected under HB 900…. Any assertion to the contrary is either rooted in ignorance of state law or an open hostility to the will of the people," Patterson wrote in a letter to Flusche. "Not only is your interpretation of HB 900 completely wrong, but your decision to ban the Bible was likely illegal."
Patterson cited a part of the Texas education code that requires schools to carry "religious literature, including the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) and New Testament."
Of course, that precludes the Bible from meeting Texas standards for "sexually explicit" material. It just means that Texas authorities make exceptions for certain texts portraying sexual conduct. It also illustrates further how involved the state government is in micromanaging exactly what can and can't be available in schools throughout the state. And it's kind of funny how the only "religious literature" explicitly named in the code is the Christian Bible.
In any event, the Bible is now back on Canyon Independent School District library shelves, the school district said in a statement. Furthermore, it was never removed from schools entirely. "The Bible has always been, and continues to be, available in our schools to support instructional resources and meet all [statewide education] requirements," said the district. "This longstanding practice has not changed. Additionally, our libraries contain books about the Bible, including Bible stories, which remain available to our students."
"Following the passage of House Bill 900, Canyon [school district] conducted a comprehensive review of library materials to ensure compliance with updated state guidelines," the district explained. "After receiving clarification from Representative Patterson regarding library content, we reevaluated the guidelines and are pleased to have the Bible available in each of our Canyon [school] libraries."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One of the best illustrations yet of government hypocrisy, and why government should stop having anything to do with schools. Hell, one of the best arguments for limiting government, period.
And yet the whole focus is on government doing its bad deeds wrongly, with nothing to say about whether government should even be doing them at all.
Principles about individualism is what distinguishes a libertarian rag and site from all other partisan hackery. Too bad Reason has forgotten that.
Or perhaps there is a difference between the Bible and child porn. Only pedos like ENB conflate the 2
She will push any specious argument that pushes porn on kids. Otherwise, there may one day may not be enough whores.
There may be a difference between the Bible and child porn but the Texas READER Act fails to draw it. The READER Act was poorly drafted and rushed through without adequate review or debate.
"Principles about individualism is what distinguishes a libertarian rag and site from all other partisan hackery. Too bad Reason has forgotten that."
Here we go again, criticizing a FACTUAL news report for SNOT being an editorial! What do FACTS have to do with "Principles about individualism"?
Reason reports, "Man bites dog in East ButtFockIstanistanistanistan". JUST the FACTS, Ma'am!!!
Just providing factual FOOD FOR THOUGHT, and SNOT telling us TWAT to think!!! Hello?!?!?!
Reason's oh-SOOOO-smarter-than-them critics: "WHY does Treason.cum want to eat MY innocent puppy-dogs, fur cryin' out loud"?!?!?!
If'n ye want to be told TWAT to think, just read almost ALL of the inane cumments here!!!
One wonders how many explicitly libertarian books this school district (or any U.S. school district) carries on its shelves? Obviously, all school libraries have to make choices: one cannot carry every book published. But I do wonder how many have even two or three of the canonical literature of free markets and free minds?
They could subscribe to the print rag and pretend they care as much as Reason writers and editors pretend to care.
What's funny about this is the number of times the bible had been checked out of the school library over the last 20 years was somewhere around 0.
don't even get them started on Enoch or Nicodemus or Peter ...
The next logical step would be to excerpt the explicit passages from the bible and publish them separately. Think how many laughs we could all get from that!
People have published such things before.
No less a figure than Thomas Jefferson edited out parts he didn't like!
As much as I would like to be onboard with this in principle, the milquetoast stuff in Psalms was clearly written by celibate beta-male scribes. Honestly the rape of Bathsheba is a great lesson on power dynamics and consent, and it contains the seeds of apostasy.
"Hang Mike Pence", The Donald tells us! That shit is WAAAY weak tea cumpared to The Bible, where God tells us to kill EVERYONE!!!
God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!! Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10). Therefore, ALL must have done at least one thing bad, since they’d be righteous, had they never done anything bad. Well, maybe they haven’t actually DONE evil, maybe they THOUGHT something bad (Matt. 5:28, thoughts can be sins). In any case, they must’ve broken SOME commandment, in thinking or acting, or else they'd be righteous. James 2:10 tells us that if we've broken ANY commandment, we broke them ALL. Now we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it (Matt. 5:17). So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything. And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses! There’s working on Sunday. There’s also making sacrifices to, or worshipping, the wrong God (Exodus 22:20, Deut. 17:2-5), or even showing contempt for the Lord’s priests or judges (Deut. 17:12). All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses. OK, so now we’re finally there... God’s Word COMMANDS us such that we’ve got to kill EVERYBODY!!!
(I am still looking for that special exception clause for me & my friends & family… I am sure that I will find it soon!)
"Puerto Rico Outage Leaves More Than 1.2 Million Without Power"
Does this mean some wise-ass will make a joke about it in four years, and induce a wave of faux outrage from the left?
I don't get it.
Is the Bible too "sexually explicit" for minors
There are certainly parts of the Bible that are not appropriate for young children. But the way to deal with that is for children to have adult guidance when reading the Bible, not to remove it from the library.
Do the words "political stunt" appear anywhere in the article?
Did Flusche really feel that stocking the Bible violated Texas law? Or is he simply trying to make a point about the broadness and potential unintended consequences of the READER Act?
Neither. He's trying to pretend that the Song of Songs - a book of Wisdom that celebrates the Beauty (capital B) of marriage, fidelity, and their Goodness (capital G) in the eyes of God - is the equal of LGBT pedo pornography that crudely depicts masturbation, homosexual oral and anal sex, prostitution, and pedophilia as entertaining/enlightening topics that should be normalized and embraced.
A quick google of "Darryl Flusche" immediately reveals Groomer Alert.
His stunt was just anti-Christian bigotry coupled LGBT pedo activism. Nothing more. Don't overthink it.
I performed a search with my tinfoil hate-hat, and lo and behold... "Darryl Flusche" is the Revealed TRUE ID of AT the AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian!!! Ass every criminal is a cop, and every cop is a criminal... AT the AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian is secretly a pedo porn star!!!
Interesting. It's as if using the term "anti-Christian bigotry coupled with LGBT pedo" magically made SQRL appear.
That day your "harmful for kids" books got defined.
What was that definition, btw?
The definition was ... Bibles are "harmful for kids". lololol (made me laugh)
Great. Now we can divide the nation further arguing about that dictated-definition, and the next one, and the next one, and the next one. /s
Or maybe everyone can just agree to leave everyone else alone and stay out of their business including the business of raising one's own kids.
There is a LOT of sex in the Bible.
Sex AND violence! Don't forget the violence! Ass long ass the violence is from (committed by) the GOOD Tribe against the BAD Tribe, shit's all good!!! So be SURE to perform the RIGHT Rituals and Shituals, and Kiss God's Ass thereby, in just the RIGHT way! Love your neighbor? Bah, humbug! Focus, instead, on Kissing God's Ass with the RIGHT Rituals!!!
...but it then follow up by showing sex producing children.
The Bible portrays adultery as very bad, not to mention sodomy.
But these clowns are going to make it morally equivalent to books with sympathetic portrayals of adultery, sodomy, etc.
Maybe 'moral standards' shouldn't be in the hands of the State.
Maybe that is just too close to legislating religion.
Is legislating religion okay so long as it is for everyone else's kids?
How long will that premise stay contained before some P.O.S. Alito proclaims [WE] mob 'moral standards' has supremacy over Individual rights?
How slippery can [WE] make that slope?
If we're not allowed to have picture books of kids sucking adult dick, then you can't have a bible.
...precisely the ?benefit? of having Commie-Everything.
How [WE] all get to decide on having nothing at all.
Maybe laws that set precedence for book banning isn't the right direction for Republicans.
Maybe repealing laws that made Communist structures is the right direction for a USA founded on Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
Then the porn-shop and the christian library can both exist in their own Non-Communist space peacefully.
Is it only human sexual conduct that is banned from Texas schoolbooks, or is sexual conduct between animals included too? I think it used to be (and likely still is) commonplace for kids to watch pets and farm animals mating, and thereby learn something about analogous human behavior. Are descriptions of such things now to be banned?
The animals shall be cummanded to wear chastity belts!
(Or maybe in our newer, higher-tech era, we can all be equipped with AI-driven brain-interface gadgets to "black out" or "turn to fuzz" perception of any such outrageous stunts going on in the natural or farm worlds.)
"It also illustrates further how involved the state government is in micromanaging exactly what can and can't be available in schools throughout the state."
Since they're the state's own schools, who else would be managing them? Nebraska?
There is a fair amount of [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] trying to manage them from D.C.
And STEALING from "the people" for them.
Maybe they're [Na]tional So[zi]alist indoctrination camps for kids.
...because that's how the Nazi-Empire grows.
'Guns' (Gov-Guns) are the only *tool* that can teach kids. /s