Review: Illustrating Britain's Victorian Booze Restrictions
Temperance activists argued that "the people" should have a say in how many alcohol sellers could serve a given neighborhood.

In an effort to discourage alcohol consumption during the late 19th century, British temperance groups produced and circulated "drink maps" showing where people in particular cities could buy booze. That counterintuitive strategy reflected the conviction that easy access to alcohol was patently scandalous—a threat to public morals and health that could be mitigated by local licensing authorities once they knew exactly how easy it was to get drunk.
As Kris Butler explains in his copiously illustrated Drink Maps in Victorian Britain, those magistrates were empowered by a judicial determination that pubs and other alcohol vendors had no legally cognizable interest in continuing to do business. The courts also held that magistrates, in deciding whether to award or renew annual licenses, could consider local needs as they saw them. The maps aimed to show that existing options exceeded those needs.
Butler finds little evidence that officials took much advantage of that open-ended authority. Temperance activists argued that "the people" should have a say in how many alcohol sellers could serve a given neighborhood. But those merchants understandably thought that test already had been met by their ability to turn a profit in the crowded marketplace reflected in the activists' maps.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Temperance activists argued that "the people" should have a say in how many alcohol sellers could serve a given neighborhood."
All is for The Collective Hive, Cumrades!!! And I AM The People, so twat I say, goes!
Also note that "the people" should have a say in how many vote buyers and other types of politicians can serve a given planet. The People (AKA The Donald) says that there should be ONE such Supreme Uber-Honcho for the Planet Earth, and maybe beyond! Today, Canada, Panama, and Greenland! Tomorrow, the world!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-takes-aim-canada-greenland-panama-canal-christmas-day-posts-rcna185416