Kay Granger, Like Joe Biden, Is a Symptom of America's Gerontocracy
The 81-year-old congresswoman has not voted since July, at which point she apparently moved into an eldercare facility.

Just as democracy means a system of government ruled by the dēmos, or the common people, gerontocracy refers to rule by the elderly. It was coined in the 19th century as a pejorative to describe the aged French parliament, but it can refer to any government whose leaders are of sufficiently advanced age.
While being long in the tooth does not automatically indicate diminished mental faculties, it's enough of a concern that many jobs—even those without the ability to deploy troops or launch nuclear weapons—have maximum age limits.
It's a concept on full display during the latter days of President Joe Biden's term in office. Last week, The Wall Street Journal detailed the tactics used by Biden's staff and inner circle "to adapt the White House around the needs of a diminished leader." Advisers acted as go-betweens, keeping the elderly Biden at arm's length from lawmakers and Cabinet officials.
"The system put Biden at an unusual remove from cabinet secretaries, the chairs of congressional committees and other high-ranking officials," the Journal authors wrote. "It also insulated him from the scrutiny of the American public."
But there is now another prominent example of a diminished elderly politician absent from the public sphere.
"Where Is Congresswoman Kay Granger?" asked an article by Carlos Turcios of The Dallas Express. Granger, a Republican representing portions of Fort Worth, is 81 years old and was first elected to Congress in 1996. She is also a no-show at her day job, having not voted on a single piece of legislation since July 24; CBS News further reports that "between April and June of this year, Granger missed 107 of 231 eligible votes, or about 46%." (The Dallas Express CEO Chris Putnam ran against Granger unsuccessfully in the district's 2020 Republican primary.)
Granger announced in November 2023 that she would not seek reelection after her current term. Turcios notes that Granger's district office is already packed up, and calls go straight to voicemail.
As it turns out, Turcios discovered, Granger "has been residing at a local memory care and assisted living home for some time after having been found wandering lost and confused in her former…neighborhood." Independent journalist Ken Klippenstein reported on his Substack that on July 9, Granger transferred away the deed to her home in that area.
Over the weekend, Granger's son confirmed to The Dallas Morning News that his mother was "having some dementia issues late in the year" and that while she was in an independent living facility, she was not in memory care.
In a statement, Granger acknowledged "navigating some unforeseen health challenges over the past year. However, since early September, my health challenges have progressed, making frequent travel to Washington both difficult and unpredictable." Last week, Granger did attend a ceremony at the Capitol in her honor, receiving an official portrait to commemorate her tenure as chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee. (She stepped down from the position in March.) The congresswoman's X account posted a picture of her at the ceremony.
Anyone who has dealt with an ailing elder can sympathize with both Granger and her family as they navigate an inevitable but no less painful chapter in one's life. But that doesn't make her immune from criticism, especially as she continues to draw a salary on the taxpayer's dime.
"Although I am not running for re-election," Granger said when announcing her impending retirement, "I plan to serve out the remainder of my term and work with our new Speaker and my colleagues to advance our conservative agenda and finish the job I was elected to do."
Indeed, even though Granger has not voted on legislation in five months, she is still a member of Congress drawing an annual salary of $174,000. Even though she was in D.C. on December 18, she did not participate in the vote two days later to pass a continuing resolution keeping the government open.
As one congressional watcher noted on social media, House rules dictate that "Every Member shall be present…unless excused or necessarily prevented, and shall vote on each question put." In the event of an unexcused absence, the U.S. Code states that House leadership "shall deduct from the monthly payments…of each Member or Delegate the amount of his salary for each day that he has been absent from the House."
"Decades ago, an absent Member was fined by the House unless he or she was granted a Leave of Absence," the House website notes, before adding, "that is no longer the case." It does allow, though, that "members may choose not to request a Leave of Absence if he/she believes it would draw unnecessary attention to his/her absence."
Sources told CBS News that Granger moved to the facility "around July," which is also when she both stopped showing up for votes and ceded ownership of her house. According to Legistorm, Granger paid her staff nearly $360,000 between July and September—a period in which she did not vote.
Granger did at least step down from her post atop the House Appropriations Committee, which drafts the bills that fund the federal government. Before she died in office at age 90, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D–Calif.) served for years as the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee even amid accusations of cognitive decline.
Still, it's a damning indictment of the current crop of elected officials that even amid debilitating health issues that prevent them from doing their jobs, some politicians would still rather hold onto power than give it up.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The circumstances aren’t even close to the same. And the media didn’t spend over five years blatantly lying to cover up her condition.
Funny how Lancaster, and Reason in general, was nearly as in the tank for this as the mainstream democrat media.
Not "nearly." But otherwise yes, this^^ x 1000.
It’s Christmas, so I pissed some charity upon them.
You realize they're state media, right?
Sullum, Emma, Billy, ENB, Robby, Jack, Fiona, Joe, Ceej, Petti, CB, Eric, Chaz - it's like they're not even real people. In our age of technological marvel, I wouldn't be surprised if they're all just KMW using ChatGPT. And occasionally throwing money at Stossel as a royalty for rerunning his segments to pretend like the site still has Libertarian legitimacy.
"The system put Biden at an unusual remove from cabinet secretaries, the chairs of congressional committees and other high-ranking officials," the Journal authors wrote.
And yet a great many of the public were able to cobble together enough of the pieces to understand that he was sufficiently addled to warrant removal from office. What was interesting was the willful ignorance of the WSJ and other journalists.
Granger is a Republican, which might explain the effort to track her down.
Credit where it's due. The WSJ was the only "serious" paper reporting on this 2+ years ago. Which is quite an accomplishment given the increasing left tilt in its news division.
Trump Republicans should insure the MAGA succession by replacing Johnson with Granger as Speaker of the House.
You’re confused. That’s something a democrat would do.
Nope. S/he's a TDS-addled slimy pile of shit.
I know, it in the spirit of Christmas I shit some charity upon him.
Sometimes a really bad decision turns out to be an improvement.
They came square-jawed, big haired and collagen lipped, from Florida, Fox News and Fox Business, pro football and the WWF.
They came from daytime talk shows and Newsmax2, ‘straight out of central casting’, as the future president said.
Some of the women resemble his daughter and some of the women his wife. None of the men resemble him, but a squad of them came to Madison Square Garden to flank him at the Ultimate Fighting matches.
The future secretary of defence sports tattoos of a Jerusalem cross, the ‘Deus vult ! ’ Crusader war cry & an AR-15 blazoned American flag.
His future Secretary of homeland security shot her hunting dog in a gravel pit because it couldn’t hunt and her pet goat because it was getting old and ‘nasty’.
The future secretary of health and human services cut off the head of a beached whale with a chainsaw, and drove home with it on the roof of his SUV.
Only the deranged could fail to hail him as God-Emperor.
I guess her vote wasn't important enough for someone to wheel her in and hold a pen in her hand.
While the average party loyalist in a congresscritter's district may not know about the critter's decline, the party insiders do. One would think enough young turks and those who have been waiting on the side lines for "their turn" (such as the long time, suffering Chief of Staff) would step in and primary any critter in this condition who refuses to step aside.
So, where are the younger candidates, and why aren't voters voting for younger candidates?
Dead voters think age is nothing but a number.
They’re all woke a-holes.
LOL...no such thing as "woke"
Young people today are afraid of growing up and don't want responsibilities.
Often the complain is that there are too many Baby Boomers still in office and then the complainer lists off a bunch of Silent Generation (older than Baby Boomers).
Silent Generation Senators:
1) Bernie Sanders (born 1941)
2) Mitch McConnell (born 1942)
3) Chuck Grassley (born 1933)
4) Jim Risch (born 1943)
5) Ben Cardin (born 1943)
6) Angus King (born 1944)
7) Dick Durbin (born 1944)
Silent Generation House of Representatives:
1) Nancy Pelosi (born 1940)
2) Hal Rogers (born 1937)
3) Grace Napolitano (born 1936)
4) Eddie Bernice Johnson (born 1935)
5) Kay Granger (born 1943)
6) Maxine Waters (born 1938)
7) Steny Hoyer (born 1939)
8) Jim Clyburn (born 1940)
9) Danny Davis (born 1941)
10) John Carter (born 1941)
11) Frederica Wilson (born 1942)
12) Anna Eshoo (born 1942)
13) Rosa DeLauro (born 1943)
14) Virginia Foxx (born 1943)
15) Doris Matsui (born 1944)
16) Emanuel Cleaver (born 1944)
17) John Garamendi (born 1945)
18) Bonnie Watson Coleman (born 1945)
19) Jim Baird (born 1945)
20) David Scott (born 1945)
While I agree that Baby Boomers should either be retired or thinking about retirement, there is absolutely no reason that any of the Silent Generation office holders should still be in office.
The oldest Baby Boomers, born in 1946, would be 78 years old.
The youngest Baby Boomers, born in 1964, would be 60 years old.
Baby Boomers get a bad rap by younger generations, but in reality the younger generations are lumping the Silent Generation office holders still clinging to power and blaming the Baby Boomer generation.
Perhaps there should be a max age limit to run for office? Maybe 65 for the Senate (66 + 6 years in office = 72 at end of term) and maybe 70 for the house (70 + 2 years in office = 72 at end of term). This would age out some of the oldest Baby Boomers and all of the Silent Generation, but not all Baby Boomers.
Eddie Bernice Johnson retired effective January 3, 2023 and died December 31, 2023.
Ben Cardin is retiring in about two weeks.
You need to update your list.
That’s good news.
It does not matter, but is interesting.
Silent Generation Senators:
1. Bernie Sanders (born 1941) - Independent (caucuses with Democrats)
2. Mitch McConnell (born 1942) - Republican
3. Chuck Grassley (born 1933) - Republican
4. Jim Risch (born 1943) - Republican
5. Ben Cardin (born 1943) - Democrat
6. Angus King (born 1944) - Independent (caucuses with Democrats)
7. Dick Durbin (born 1944) - Democrat
Total Democrats (including Independents who caucus with Democrats): 4
Total Republicans: 3
Silent Generation House of Representatives:
1. Nancy Pelosi (born 1940) - Democrat
2. Hal Rogers (born 1937) - Republican
3. Grace Napolitano (born 1936) - Democrat
4. Eddie Bernice Johnson (born 1935) - Democrat
5. Kay Granger (born 1943) - Republican
6. Maxine Waters (born 1938) - Democrat
7. Steny Hoyer (born 1939) - Democrat
8. Jim Clyburn (born 1940) - Democrat
9. Danny Davis (born 1941) - Democrat
10. John Carter (born 1941) - Republican
11. Frederica Wilson (born 1942) - Democrat
12. Anna Eshoo (born 1942) - Democrat
13. Rosa DeLauro (born 1943) - Democrat
14. Virginia Foxx (born 1943) - Republican
15. Doris Matsui (born 1944) - Democrat
16. Emanuel Cleaver (born 1944) - Democrat
17. John Garamendi (born 1945) - Democrat
18. Bonnie Watson Coleman (born 1945) - Democrat
19. Jim Baird (born 1945) - Republican
20. David Scott (born 1945) - Democrat
Total Democrats: 15
Total Republicans: 5
I think all of them are way past their sell-by date - but the worst offenders are the ones who also have been in Congress for decades. The combination is pure donor-class corruption. Using name-recognition and donor preferences for incumbency to eliminate all challengers who may be willing to understand the 21st century.
Grassley was first elected to public office in 1959. He will be third in line for the Presidency in a few days. But he seems to be more cognitively sound than Trump, who is the oldest person ever to be elected President.
This throws into question the meaning of the term "Representative" in representative government. Every single public office in America is supposed to be a representative one. But how can that be the case when the so called "representative" is clearly absent?
I'm thinking in particular of the Edmonton police commissioner who wanted to work remotely. From Portugal. How does that work, exactly? When you're so far removed from those you purport to "represent" and you're out of touch from their concerns and their desires - how can you still use that term?
We all know - or, should I say, don't know - at this point who's running our Executive Branch. It's not Joe Biden. It's never been Joe Biden. Or Kamalamadingdong, since she's obviously a barely functional retard DEI hire. Clearly we have no idea who is pulling the strings at Granger's Congressional seat.
Is this representative government? Or is this precisely the kind of situation the Founders guaranteed us 2A to deal with?
Interesting how the corporate press actually investigated Granger's ability to do her job, unlike the way they treated Biden and Feinstein. I wonder what their (R)eason could have been?
You would think they would be happy a Republican was skipping votes.
Trump Deceasement Syndrome has flowered since Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson joined the majority.
Problem is.....
Commie-Indoctrination Camps for Kids (Commie-Ed).
US Citizens are afraid of the young "(Gov-Gun) you down 'armed-theft' is part of their [WE] gang-rights" crowd and rightfully so. Who wants to trust a lazy spoiled brat with the largest monopoly of Guns the nation has?
Today's [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] is just half the curse. Teaching future generations they can Gov 'Gun' (instead of *EARN*) for their livelihoods is the other half of that curse.
Simple solution. After being elected the first time 50%+1 to 50%-1, in each succeeding election you must win by 1% more, I.e. 50.5 to 49.5, then 51 to 49, etc.
Has-beens clinging to power with their arthritic fingers is a symptom of elected officials having too much power. All of their hangers-on have an incentive to pretend it's business as usual, so they can continue to profit by their association with the geezer.