Disrupting IVF? Baby Born From Egg Matured Outside of Mother's Body.
The process "reduces the duration of treatment cycles to just three days" and "replaces 80% of hormone injections required with traditional IVF," Gameto says.

A company called Gameto claims to have successfully matured eggs outside of the female body, a development that could revolutionize the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process. "We are thrilled to announce a medical milestone–the world's first live birth using our product, Fertilo, that matures eggs outside the body," the company posted on X last week.
Gameto's process involves extracting immature eggs from a woman's body and then using "engineered, young ovarian support cells to recreate the natural egg maturation process in a laboratory setting." This process "reduces the duration of treatment cycles to just three days" and "replaces 80% of hormone injections required with traditional IVF," the company says.
You are reading Sex & Tech, the newsletter from Elizabeth Nolan Brown on sex, technology, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture. Want more on sex, technology, and the law? Subscribe to Sex & Tech. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
Making IVF Better
IVF has helped countless people with fertility issues to start families, but it remains incredibly taxing on the mother's body even before a successful pregnancy starts. In a typical IVF process, eggs mature within a woman's body as they would with a non-assisted conception. In order to ensure that the woman produces at least one and ideally multiple eggs, she's generally given hormone injections for up to two weeks beforehand, in addition to other drugs.
These hormones and medications can induce a host of side effects. These include headaches, mood swings, insomnia, hot flashes, abdominal pain, pain at the injection site, and, in an estimated 1 to 5 percent of women, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome involves a swelling of the ovaries that can cause mild pain, nausea, and other unpleasant side effects in mild cases and, in severe cases, rapid weight gain, severe pain, shortness of breath, kidney problems, and blood clots. Ovarian stimulation processes can also increase the risk of ectopic pregnancy.
A process to mature eggs outside of a woman's ovaries could be beneficial for avoiding these side effects, and be especially useful for more at-risk populations. It could also significantly decrease the amount of time needed for the IVF process.
'A Turning Point in Reproductive Health'
Gameto claims not only to have successfully matured eggs outside of the body but to have done so for a pregnancy that resulted in a recent birth.
"On Saturday, December 7th, a healthy baby girl was born in Lima, Peru, after using the Fertilo protocol at our partner clinic [Clinica Concebir]," Gameto reported. "This marks the first ever human birth that occurred as a result of" this technology.
"Fertilo's innovative approach made the physical experience easier and also lightened the emotional burden of many hormone injections," said the unnamed mother of the child in a statement put out by Gameto.
Undoubtedly, some people will balk at this advance, viewing it as unnatural and thus, somehow, suspect. But not so long ago, many people viewed all assisted reproduction with suspicion or doubt; now, it's mainstream and commonplace.
If Gameto's process can help more people who want to have children to do so, and can make the process less physically arduous and time consuming, these are undoubtedly good things.
"By overcoming the major challenges of conventional IVF, such as long treatment cycles, significant side effects, and the emotional and physical strain, Fertilo provides a potentially faster, safer, and more accessible solution for families," said Dina Radenkovic, co-founder and CEO of Gameto, in a statement. "This milestone marks a turning point in reproductive health and highlights the first application of [Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) ] technology in IVF and the immense potential of our technology."
Gameto says it has gotten approval from governments in Australia, Japan, Argentina, Paraguay, Mexico, and Peru to use Fertilo for IVF patients. "In the U.S., the company is preparing for Phase 3 trials," it reports.
IVF…and Beyond
Gameto said its Fertilo process was carried out using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology. Using iPSC in reproduction has been a scientific goal for a while—and the potential goes way beyond what Gameto is doing now. Scientists hope to eventually create human egg and sperm cells essentially from scratch.
Using iPSC tech, any basic somatic cell from the human body can generate what's known as a pluripotent stem cell. From there, iPSCs "can self-renew indefinitely in culture and differentiate into all specialized cell types including gametes," as Sharif Moradi and a team of researchers explained in a 2019 article published in the journal Stem Cell Research & Therapy.
This is incredibly cool, and has all sorts of potential applications. "Since they can be generated from any healthy person or patient, iPSCs are considered as a valuable resource for regenerative medicine to replace diseased or damaged tissues," write Moradi and his colleagues.
The implications for reproduction are also huge.
In May 2023, Eli Adashi, a Brown University reproductive biology specialist, told NPR that developing human egg and sperm cells from iPSCs—a process called in vitro gametogenesis (IVG)—was still "on the precipice of materialization." NPR cautioned that "the realization of the advance for humans likely is still years away," and "may never happen."
But if/when this advance is realized, "IVG would enable infertile women and men to have children with their own DNA instead of genes from the sperm and eggs or donors. Same goes for women of any age, rendering the biological clock irrelevant.…IVG could also enable gay and trans couples to have babies that are genetically related to both partners."
In addition to technological hurdles here, there are regulatory ones, of course.
Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), told NPR last year that the agency is "very interested in helping [IVG technology] to move it forward." But "this creeps out our attorneys," he said, noting that Congress bans the FDA from giving a green light to proposals that involve genetically manipulated human embryos. Marks notes Congress currently prohibits the FDA from even considering any proposals that would involve genetically manipulated human embryos, and this could seriously hinder the development of IVG technology in the U.S.
Nonetheless, at least two U.S. companies—Conception and Ivy Natal—have been working on IVG. "It could lead to so many people being able to have, you know, families and children to be able to have lives," Matt Krisiloff, one of Conception's founders, told NPR last year. "I just think that's a really beautiful thing."
More Sex & Tech News
• Ben Sperry, a senior scholar with the International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE), has a good year-end reflection on international developments related to kids, technology, and "protection."
• The Ohio legislature has passed a bill similar to a Florida measure famously dubbed the "Don't Say Gay" bill. House Bill 8, which is waiting on Gov. Mike DeWine's signature, would make schools "tell parents about any age-appropriate 'sexuality content' taught and any health care provided to students so parents could opt their children out," reports The Enquirer. "Opponents contend that the bill…would allow schools to censor books or classroom instruction and potentially out LGBTQ students to unsupportive or unsafe parents." Ohio also passed a bill that would create the criminal offense of "grooming."
• Pornhub is now blocking access for residents of Florida, owing to the state's age verification law.
• "A trial in Romania for Andrew Tate, the online influencer who is facing criminal accusations involving human trafficking and sexual misconduct, will not go ahead, at least for now, after an appeals court sent an indictment back to prosecutors," The New York Times reported last week. "The Bucharest Court of Appeal found that the indictment did not meet the requirements for the case to move to a trial."
Today's Image

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Brave New World, here we come!
Once artificial wombs are perfected will a woman still have the right to terminate a pregnancy that is happening outside her body?
I've often wondered about artificial wombs. They pull the rug out from underneath both sides. If a fetus can live and the mother freed from slavery with a simple operation, pregnancy is no longer slavery. If a baby can be saved with minimal effort, terminating the in-body pregnancy is no longer murder.
Both sides will still scream. "Even a week or two of pregnancy at 6 weeks is slavery!" "Artificial wombs are no substitute for God's womb!" "This allows parents to avoid responsibility for their few moments of sinful pleasure!"
Of course it will be tremendously expensive at first, added to Obamacare's essential coverage, and all progress and innovation stifled by the FDA and AMA. Nurses unions will demand a veto over all improvements which might make in-home sustenance and delivery possible.
ETA: Missed the part about terminating an artificial womb pregnancy. Yeah, that'll put the cat among the pigeons. Oops! I tripped over the power cord! Sorry about that!
The real danger is that "perfecting" these artificial wombs will, by definition, require experimenting on human beings. The question will continue to be when a human being becomes due their human rights.
Most conservatives who object to IVF are not against medical procedures helping build a family. They are objecting to the cost, which is often the destruction of many embryos that they believe are due human rights.
Yes. I'm sure it can start with other species, but there has to be a first human. There will also always be equipment failures. I'm sure there are some additional unknown unknowns we have yet to discover.
See? There HAD to be two "first" humans or there could never have been a third. But that's not what the King James Version sez as the Wholly Bauble. Girls must be killed by violent thugs menacing doctors, otherwise Jesus will be displeased. THAT is the conclusion arrived at by blind Faith. Try getting a mystic to understand that...
It's always been about what "they believe".
And that is precisely why it never should've been in 'governments' hands.
I don't understand the logic of people who defend termination up to the moment of birth. I assume the same people will come up with some logic that equates turning off an appliance with her body her choice.
Mystical brainwashees are programmed to not understand stuff. Else how could you get them to believe moronic superstitions? In this case the question is about political, that is, constitutional personhood. "All persons born..." is the constitutional standard. But the same brutes who see "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude... shall exist." Then see " All persons born or naturalized in the United States... are citizens..." Then see "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" conclude Jesus surely meant the sorites to say that females who try to vote can be arreted, fined and jailed. There are indeed levels of aggressive idiocy that can only be answered with grapeshot or spoiler votes.
'Termination' has never been what the legislation is about.
The Pro-Life mob would hold substance if they actually legislated against aggressive-acts of 'termination'. Instead they're lobbying against re-location (hint, hint: fetal ejection). Insisting the non-alive entity has supremacy rights (entitlement) over the alive entity.
pregnancy is no longer slavery
To be clear; pregnancy never was slavery and this is ceding the point.
It's like saying, "Once the harvester and the cotton gin was invented, picking cotton was no longer slavery." People picking their own cotton isn't slavery. People getting paid to pick cotton isn't slavery. Whipping someone and forcing them to run a harvester and gin without pay is still slavery.
Similarly, it's a natural biological condition like sleeping or breathing. Metaphorically, we're all slaves to biology to which we did not consent but the conflation of the metaphor with reality is just blame shifting. You're free to stop breathing at any time, but the only one obligated to pay, or not, for the consequences of doing so is you.
The issue isn't the task, it's consent and, arguably, any power imbalances unduly weighing on said consent.
Oh? Is that why Pro-Life needs Gov-Gun Legislation?
Your 'faith' using 'Guns' to dictate others =/= biology.
Outside the USA, UK Minister Anthony Eden and State Dept flunkies Green Hackworth and Breckenridge Long decided in 1943 that Nazi Germany was within her rights to exterminate all Jews and stateless people. Herbert Pell, appointed by FDR to the War Crimes Commission, disagreed. See Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau's staff "Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of Jews," 13JAN1944. Christian National Socialism, stoutly defended by Republicans before 07DEC1944, saw them slowly quail. Today it is pregnant women the Christian GOP seeks to strip of rights and endanger by deadly force. (https://jewishcurrents.org/report-to-the-secretary-on-the-acquiescence)
Sqrlsy: listen to my bat shit insanity!
Hank: hold my beer
An article about IVF without mentioning the father of IVF? That's so leftist.
Yeah, rilly. But the only possible alternative would have to be something sooo rightist, right?
This is where the "yuk" reaction will often enough determine whether you approve of the tech, regardless of the rational arguments pro or con.
"a healthy baby girl was born in Lima, Peru"--not Auburn Alabama, THAT's fer shoor. Klan hoods, pitchforks, shotguns, torches and book-and-Beatles-albums bonfires would see to THAT! Then again, in Mitt Romney's State, picture visions of marching columns of identical blond Romneyjugend and Jungmädelbund, a copy of the Book of Mormon swinging in each pink right hand in tempo to Hymn 1517, Marching to Shibboleth, in step and synchrony, there won't be a dry eye in the tabernacle. Gott Mitt Uns! The Midwich Cuckoos won't have anything on THIS coming g-g-g-generashun of clones! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLToWNAaEF8
There ya go Pro-Life. You have your 'safe baby' ("NOT just an egg", Pro-Life) incubators.
Think you can drop your 'Guns' now and let Women own their own bodies?
"they claimed"
Please note at least 70% of medical research is outright fraud. This include harvard cancer researchers who committed fraud, and all of the hhs, and the aha that was bribed to endorce Canola oil.
Undoubtedly, some people will balk at this advance, viewing it as unnatural and thus, somehow, suspect.
Not, somehow, intrinsically. If I showed you a new way of walking, on your toes with your heels pointed out, you'd rightly suspect it was unnatural. That, even if it was better, it may only be better for some people, like heavier people or people with fallen arches or people who haven't already been walking around for 30-40 yrs. 'the old-fashioned way'. It doesn't make you a Luddite or a pessimist, it keeps the progressives honest and the optimists objective. Lacking skepticism isn't science. It doesn't even really make you faithful or even a zealot. It just makes you a moron.
Same goes for women of any age, rendering the biological clock irrelevant
Also, as someone "without a biological clock", you're a retard. I've had kids in my 20s, 30s, and 40s. The only way it gets easier is by having ready-made teenagers or adults and even then, the difficulty just changes from being laborious to managerial. The only way to avoid it entirely is to... avoid it entirely.