Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Human Trafficking

'Child Trafficking' Sting Video Turns Out To Be Toy Drive

A Coca-Cola truck "full of kids" turned out to be a police charity.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.19.2024 5:45 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Coca-Cola truck and a Coca-Cola bear next to a Davenport Police Department squad car and officer and people behind a table running a charitable toy drive | Davenport Police Department/Facebook
(Davenport Police Department/Facebook)

Human trafficking panic gets a holiday twist in the latest faux trafficking scare to hit social media.

In a December 16 Instagram post that received more than 190,000 likes, user Ernest Carter shared a video of a Coca-Cola delivery truck that he claimed was found "full of kids." Carter said the truck was found in Cicero, Illinois, and that the video showed police getting the children off the truck.

"The same video and false claim have circulated elsewhere on Instagram, X, Facebook, Threads, TikTok, Bluesky, YouTube, Rumble and Gettr -- including in Spanish and French," AFP reports.

For his part, Carter apologized "for being mislead and misleading." In a follow-up video, he said that his initial post about trafficked children was wrong but there were two abandoned kids found on the truck.

This was also wrong.

The truck and the police depicted were actually outside a mall in Davenport, Iowa, where the local police association was running a toy donation drive.

Davenport Police Department spokesperson Owen Farrell said that the video depicted "no criminal investigation" and reports about child trafficking were "false" and "fake news," according to AFP.

"The Davenport Police Association is sponsoring and hosting the 22nd annual Christmas toy drive to support Family Resources Inc.," local news station KWQC reported on December 15. "The annual event raises money and collects new toys at Christmas for children involved in Family Resources Domestic Violence Shelters, Child Advocate programs (victims of sex assaults and other at-risk programs), and supports the Family Resources Adopt a Family Program."

I can't make out anything about the toy drive that would have led any reasonable person to conclude that this was a child trafficking sting. But this is how far down the trafficking hysteria rabbit hole Americans have gone: the mere fact of police next to a truck is enough to spawn human trafficking claims.

Despite the story's debunking, some commenters on Carter's page still refuse to let it go. "Do not gaslight yourself," one posted. "These companies do these types of things. Our world is darker and sicker than we know."

All sorts of wild and untrue stories circulate on social media, of course. But unfounded trafficking claims seem to be an especially potent and prolific genre of social media misinformation. And while it's tempting to simply chalk it up to gullibility, the power of sensational stories, and other individual factors, human trafficking panic wasn't produced in a vacuum.

Vice President Kamala Harris' claims about online sex trafficking (used to push for internet censorship and surveillance) and former/future President Donald Trump's claims about sex trafficking at the Southern border (used to push for tougher immigration restrictions and enforcement) are just two of many examples of how politicians have used the specter of human trafficking to push their preferred policies. And far from only spreading on social media, mainstream media trafficked in these myths repeatedly.

So when we see a whole lot of social media users willing to believe that a charity toy drive is a child trafficking sting, remember that what we're really looking at is the product of decades of political propaganda.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: We Don’t Need Terrorism Laws When Murder Is Already Illegal

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Human TraffickingSex TraffickingMisinformationMoral PanicChildrenSocial MediaFake NewsIllinois
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (34)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Dillinger   9 months ago

    where are the 300,000 unaccounted-for children?

    1. The Margrave of Azilia   9 months ago

      If we knew *that,* they wouldn't be unaccounted for, duh!

      1. Dillinger   9 months ago

        I was hoping they too were props and inside the Coke truck

      2. NM Dave   9 months ago

        The point is, they don't exist, and never did in the first place. The number is fabricated out of thin air to support a panic that, while it addresses a real problem, is so overblown that everyone is now paranoid and is raising their children to be distrustful of everything and everyone everywhere.

    2. Public Entelectual   9 months ago

      Many in California fear they have fallen prey to carnivorous squirrels.

      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10164-024-00832-6

    3. Brandybuck   9 months ago

      Trumpf had them deported. Gawd bless Trumpf.

  2. TrickyVic (old school)   9 months ago

    ""Despite the story's debunking, some commenters on Carter's page still refuse to let it go. "Do not gaslight yourself," one posted. "These companies do these types of things. Our world is darker and sicker than we know."''

    But the democrats did it first.

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   9 months ago

      But the democrats did it first.

      If all posts get finished with this line, could we finally put Sarc out of his $0.50 job? Because I would be up for that.

      1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

        Actually-factually, the Demon-Craps did shit first, and THEN the democrats did shit, too! So then THAT makes shit all OK for us ALL to do shit! Especially if we all wear Magic Underwear!

  3. VULGAR MADMAN   9 months ago

    Now jeffy wishes he had been a cop.

  4. Longtobefree   9 months ago

    Never, ever, believe anything on (anti) social media.

  5. sarcasmic   9 months ago

    Didn’t Sevo, the Canadian or some other idiot post this in the mourning lynx? The panic that is.

  6. AT   9 months ago

    But this is how far down the trafficking hysteria rabbit hole Americans have gone

    How much child trafficking is acceptable in your book, ENB?

    I mean, it's one thing to say, "When you hear hoofbeats think horses not zebras," but sex trafficking is not "political propaganda."

    It really happens.

    And the reason you have this sort of de facto support of it is because you know that trying to address the problem of sex trafficking (child or otherwise) threatens the sex trade in general. Better to ignore sex trafficking, if it'll help protect prostitution itself - than to in any way hinder prostitution, even if it would address sex trafficking.

    And that's a messed up set of priorities right there. When child sex trafficking is the lesser of two evils in your book, it means your Good vs Evil barometer is extremely broken.

    1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

      Sure, AT, sure! Twatever You say, PervFected One! If some drunk reports spotting a child molester in his toilet bowl while puking his guts out, in Nebraska, then the whole State of Nebraska should be SHUT DOWN AND SHIT DOWN!!! 'Cause we DO know the difference between good and evil, and we must stop at NOTHING to oppose EVIL child abuse!!! MAN THE BARRICADES!!!!

      1. AT   9 months ago

        I really wish you wouldn't do drugs before you reply to my posts. Please, seek help.

        Also, you didn't answer the question. Yes, I directed it toward ENB, but you could similarly answer it: How much child trafficking is acceptable in your book?

        1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

          None is acceptable!

          How much OVER-REACTING AND PANTS-SHITTING about IMAGINARY child trafficking is acceptable in Your book?

          Oh, and also, how much WITCH-BURNING (of actually innocent people) "justified" by IMAGINARY child trafficking is acceptable in Your PervFected book? You just LOVE to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH all of these people who are LESS PervFect than YOU, don't You, Oh PervFected One, Who Knows PervFectly, exactly WHO is, and who is SNOT, a child molester... OR, WHO is one of that them thar illegal sub-humans, trannies, accused “groomers”, abortionists, gays, heathens, infidels, vaxxers, mask-wearers, atheists, dirty hippies, Jews, witches, or, the very WORST of them all, being one of those accused of STEALING THE ERECTIONS OF OUR DEAR LEADER, right, right-wing wrong-nuts? ANY methods are OK, so long as they are used against the CORRECT enemies, am I right?

          1. AT   9 months ago

            So, none is acceptable, but not to worry because it doesn't actually happen anyway? That's your position?

            1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

              No, my position is that PervFected YOU should stop being an evil, greedy power pig!

              I've answered YOUR PervFect questions... When will PervFect You answer my reasonable question?

              How much OVER-REACTING AND PANTS-SHITTING about IMAGINARY child trafficking is acceptable in Your book?

              Note that I did NOT say that NO child trafficking exists... I do believe that SOME alleged child abuse IS imaginary!

              Do YOU believe that by YOU alleging child abuse, that PervFect YOU should be given VAST powers to root out ALL of Your imagined child abuse? Is NO "child abuse" EVER just imaginary?

              1. AT   9 months ago

                Note that I did NOT say that NO child trafficking exists.

                Should we do something about it? Even if it means ENB can't turn tricks on the street corner?

                1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

                  Do YOU believe that by YOU alleging child abuse, that PervFect YOU should be given VAST powers to root out ALL of Your imagined child abuse? Is NO "child abuse" EVER just imaginary?

                  So I take shit that Your PervFect Answers there are "Yes" and "Yes".

                  1. AT   9 months ago

                    You didn't answer the question. Should we do something about child sex trafficking, even if it means unintended negative consequences for ENB's skid row income?

                    1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

                      You answered NONE of my questions, and I answered several of yours!

                      Now...

                      Do YOU believe that by YOU alleging child abuse, that PervFect YOU should be given VAST powers to root out ALL of Your imagined child abuse? Is NO "child abuse" EVER just imaginary; just existing ONLY in YOUR PervFect Mind, Oh PervFected One?

                      So I take shit that Your PervFect Answers there are "Yes" (AT is a PervFected Power Pig) and "Yes" (NO Power-Pig-imagined child abuse is EVER just imaginary).

                    2. AT   9 months ago

                      Should we do something about child sex trafficking, yes or no?

                    3. SQRLSY   9 months ago

                      Yes, we should do something about the REAL instances of child sex trafficking AND trafucking! The trafucking (travesty-fucking) is ass conducted by the Likes of PervFected-in-Shit's-Own-Mind AT (AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian) "Boy Who Cried Wolf" and sees a child molester in his toilet bowl every time that shit gets too drunk, retches shit's guts out, and "sees things"! The "Boy Who Cried Wolf" MUST be told, in no uncertain terms, to FUCK OFF and GO TO HELL till such time ass shit can STOP polluting and cuntaminating the REAL effort to fight child abuse! Else the hunt for "child abuse" becums a JOKE foisted upon sensible people by a joker, PervFect Power Pig, AuthorShitarian, and TotalShitarian!

                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria ... This Shit was done by YOU, wasn't shit, AuthorShitarian and TotalShitarian?!?!

                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repressed_memory if ye can SNOT recall having been the witch-hunt instigator here, shit must be because of Your PervFectly "repressed memories"!

                    4. AT   9 months ago

                      Yes, we should do something about the REAL instances of child sex trafficking

                      What should we do about them?

    2. mad.casual   9 months ago

      How much child trafficking is acceptable in your book, ENB?

      I LOL'ed at the line in the context of Reason's rampant "(Australian) Police tase old woman with a knife who falls and, a week later, dies." reporting like, after their "mostly peaceful" coverage and "Trust the FBI statistics, Trump/Vance is wrong" takes, we should just assume or know that there's some nefarious plot by some state actors somewhere to tase everyone over 80 with a knife to falling over and eventually dying and take over the world.

      1. mad.casual   9 months ago

        And, yes, ENB's moral compass has been utterly fucked for a long, long time.

  7. Social Justice is neither   9 months ago

    So still criminal gang related activity.

  8. Vesicant   9 months ago

    Yeah, everybody knows only French housewives and British adolescents can be trafficked. Can't happen here in America. I mean, only 1 in 7 of children reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children become victims of sexual trafficking. Looks like 'reason' finds that an acceptable number.

    unicefusa.org/stories/child-trafficking-hits-close-home

    1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

      Follow The Science!!! Vesicant is an EXPERT Sex-trafficking EXPERT of Expertology!!! And if Vesicant says that the State of Nebraska should be SHUT DOWN AND SHIT DOWN for a thorough examination of reports from some drunk who spotted child abuse in his toilet, while puking his guts out... Than DAMN the dorpedoes; dorp FULL SPEED AHEAD into that shitdown!!!

      Follow The Science at all times!!! And throw OUT your black plastic kitchen utensils!!!

      https://arstechnica.com/health/2024/12/journal-that-published-faulty-black-plastic-study-removed-from-science-index/ Journal that published faulty black plastic study removed from science index

    2. mad.casual   9 months ago

      Look, those numbers and the supporting factoids are made up by a self-serving activist organization.

      The numbers and facts from FIRE helping assistant adjunct professors, women's health/abortion advocacy groups, anti-captial punishment organizations declaring "[adjective] science is junk science", and the FBI's crime statistics... those are bedrock truths.

  9. Brandybuck   9 months ago

    The Second Amendment does not protect outright slander and libel. Time that victims of social media fear mongering fought back with lawsuits. Let's see Coca Cola sue the shit out of this turkey.

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   9 months ago

      No, as far as I know the Second Amendment has nothing to do with “outright slander and libel”, so you are correct.

      Very dumbly.

      1. SQRLSY   9 months ago

        Esteemed Greasy-Pants, very dumbly, can NEVER force shitself to actually AGREE with REAL libertarians, who like REAL individual freedom, as well as appreciating nuance, and legal action against people who engage in clearly damaging-to-innocent-others outright LIES, including lies in court, under oath! For thousands of years, sensible people have seen the EVIL here, and fought this shit! Butt not Power Pigs, evil people, liars, and Esteemed Greasy-Pants! Butt I repeat myself!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's 'Firing' of Lisa Cook Is Headed for SCOTUS

Damon Root | 9.18.2025 7:00 AM

Brazil's Democracy Is Not Safer After Bolsonaro's Conviction

César Báez | 9.18.2025 6:30 AM

How Did Poland Get So Far Ahead of Hungary?

Eric Boehm | From the October 2025 issue

Brickbat: Hail, Caesar

Charles Oliver | 9.18.2025 4:00 AM

House Republicans Just Voted To Give Even More Tariff Power Away to Trump

Jack Nicastro | 9.17.2025 4:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300