Baby Incentives
Plus: New Jersey mysteries, cigarettes for homeless people, and more...

Child tax credit battles: Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) is pitching the idea of raising the child tax credit from $2,000 per child to $5,000 per child and allowing parents to take advantage of such credit not only once the child is born but also retroactively for the year prior when the mother was pregnant.
This plan would reportedly cost $2 trillion to $3 trillion over the next 10 years, per Bloomberg. But tax credits are simply allowing people to keep more of their earnings, instead of the government being entitled to taking them. The problem is when tax revenue shrinks yet government spending doesn't keep pace, we deepen the deficit hole we're already in.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Get your daily news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.
Interestingly, Hawley "wants to apply the credit to payroll taxes, allowing even Americans who do not make enough to pay income taxes to access bigger refunds," notes Axios. This plan, which has also been endorsed by incoming Vice President J.D. Vance, has found plenty of supporters on the right and represents a possible shift by conservatives toward more explicitly pro-family policy.
What has been happening in New Jersey? About a month ago, residents of New Jersey started noticing substantial numbers of drones—as many as 10 or 15 at once!—hovering in the skies above them.
driving through new jersey pic.twitter.com/ns9pIB4tUP
— Kevin Finnerty (@timeimmemorial_) December 12, 2024
"It's unnerving when you walk out your door, and this is what you see," one Morristown resident told The New York Times. "Federal officials have said that there is no evidence that the sightings pose a threat to public safety, or that a majority of them are even drones," the same Times article clarified. "Many of the sightings have actually proved to be manned aircraft mistaken as drones, according to officials with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the F.B.I." But there hasn't been a lot of information given as to what exactly is happening, and why it's happening now, leaving a lot of residents scared and irked.
One angle worth considering, while we await more information about what the hell is happening, is that we're actually more vulnerable to aerial attack than we realize and that, regardless of whether these are drones flown by foreign adversaries, the future involves such threats (and we're nowhere near ready for it).
Noah Smith writes in his Substack Noahpinion:
The basic idea here is that because drones are cheap to make in large numbers and hard to detect, they can easily penetrate peacetime air defenses that would easily catch and intercept manned aircraft. This means that every city and town and neighborhood is now vulnerable to approach by drones—we're just not going to put radars, electronic warfare devices, and point defense cannons on every city block in the country. If drones want to get close to you, they can.
People in New Jersey are panicking because this fact is just now sinking in.
Smith writes that "this is already a reality for Ukrainians living in the war-torn city of Kherson" where "Russians are using drones to hunt civilians." He cites the Financial Times: "When clouds gather, rain pours and winds sweep through this southern Ukrainian city, locals take their cue to run errands—sensing a pause, at least temporarily, in the terror that has filled their skies. Kherson's civilians have been, since midsummer, the target of an experiment without precedent in modern European warfare: a concerted Russian campaign to empty a city by stalking its residents with attack drones." The piece continues:
The killer machines, sometimes by the swarm, hover above homes, buzz into buildings and chase people down streets in their cars, riding bicycles or simply on foot. The targets are not soldiers, or tanks, but civilian life…Since mid-July, Kherson and its neighbouring villages along the western side of the Dnipro river have suffered more than 9,500 attacks with small drones, killing at least 37 people and injuring hundreds more.
New Jersey is facing nothing of the sort. But there's something absolutely disturbing about the fact that we would be wholly unprepared for such an attack and that, in the meantime, our government officials don't see fit to tell us much of anything.
Scenes from New York: "The New York City Campaign Finance Board voted to withhold as much as $4.3 million in matching funds from Mayor Eric Adams, as he faces federal corruption charges focused on his fund-raising practices," reports The New York Times. You simply must enjoy the sheer delusion that's leading Adams to run for reelection; it probably won't go well, but his confidence is refreshing!
QUICK HITS
- "A federal government department denies any involvement in the city of Yellowknife's handing out cigarettes as an incentive among the mostly Indigenous homeless population to participate in a Point-in-Time (PiT) count," reports Canada's National Post.
- A good question:
I think things in San Francisco are finally turning around, but has anyone written the definitive account of how 2014-2024 was basically a lost decade for the city? It was showered with fabulous amounts of wealth, and has surprisingly little to show for it.
— M. Nolan Gray (@mnolangray) December 16, 2024
- Big news in the world of fertility treatments:
This is neglected news more people should see.
Traditional egg maturation requires women to do about two weeks of hormonal stimulation.
With this new method, you only need about three days, and about 80% of required injections are no longer needed, making IVF safer and easier. https://t.co/yL96PJYdUB
— Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil) December 16, 2024
- A teenager opened fire at a Christian school in Wisconsin, killing at least two people and injuring six before committing suicide.
- A federal jury in Nevada awarded $34 million to a woman for a wrongful conviction; the woman, Kirstin Blaise Lobato, had spent nearly 16 years in prison for a murder she did not commit. The full story is absolutely wild.
- How Donald Trump's tariffs helped northern Vietnam
- "For the furthest extremes of the American left, it doesn't matter that Luigi [Mangione] was a Huberman-loving center-right thinkboi hollowed out by pain and drugs, tragically lost to demons," writes Mike Solana at Pirate Wires. "Marxists have reshaped him into a folk hero, with songs of class war amplified across every corner of the social internet."
- "Interestingly, there's possibly some sign that young people are using less social media in general than in 2022," writes Noah Smith of recent Pew Research data on social media use for teens. "That might correspond to the end of the pandemic and the resumption of real-life interaction, or it might be a response to the general realization that public social media platforms are toxic and unhealthy. Note that the only significant gains in the last 2 years came from WhatsApp, which is a small-group chat service rather than a public platform." Teens are apparently using both Facebook and X way less than they used to.
- Vaccine revisionism is no match for Community Notes:
I fully believe vaccines cause Autism.
It's another example of crimes against humanity.
And innocent babies, children, and their families are the victims. https://t.co/uR4T1kEsoX
— Marjorie Taylor Greene ???????? (@mtgreenee) December 16, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) is pitching the idea of raising the child tax credit from $2,000 per child to $5,000 per child...
Family is the most important thing so why not make it lucrative.
If it wasn't for Hawley, Reason might have had to start reporting on the crazy stuff that the Democrats were proposing.
...or maybe not.
Like removing the electoral college? The billions they are rushing to give to NGOs? More Ukraine spending? Locking in remote work for feds? Extending tech dump agreements to China for 5 more years?
Local stories.
Some people did some things.
What if instead we linked having children with being able to lessen your social security taxes? So, essentially, you'd be agreeing that you would be responsible for yourself or rely on your children to support you, so you don't have to pay into SS?
The problem is that that still doesn’t seem to address the root causes of people not getting married and having kids. Until we address the treatment of men in society and how they get treated by women, I doubt we’ll have much movement there.
So end trans/gender marxism?
Figure out how to get people to at least date again. It seems to be dead right now. The apps suck majorly, and all of the other avenues seem to be closed. Hell, young men are being told not to even approach women lest they be considered creeps. I mean, even look at the treatment of Daniel Penny by women. Instead of being hailed as a hero for stopping the guy from threatening them, they condemn him. They choose the bear (and not the one in Jeffy’s trunk). Gen Z males seem to have it the worst with a majority of them sexless at age 30.
Work with a guy in his late 20’s who, in general seems like a normal, intelligent, friendly guy. I don’t pry, so I might be unaware, but from talking to him a little it seems his social life consists mostly of playing video games online and going to sporting events with his male friends.
Yeah, I worked with a guy like that a few years ago too only he was a bit of a mama’s boy. His mom still did his laundry, cooked for him, and lived a few minutes away. I think this is another big part of the problem with younger men, that their moms are overly involved in their lives, which will drive away most of the few women who are still looking for a real guy.
And even if they do date, find a wife, and have kids, there's a real chance that the wife might decide she's bored and want a divorce. Then he loses half or more of the wealth he's accrued, likely loses his house, doesn't get custody of his kids, while having to pay alimony to his former spouse. There is also a chance she claims he was "abusive" to help her destroy him in the divorce proceedings.
There is still a good chance a young man today will not face any of that, will find a good wife and have a happy family. But it's a big gamble for many a young man to risk having everything taken from him because his wife gets bored, or she thinks she can do better.
If we fix the clear bias for the wife in divorce and family court, it would go a long way to reducing the disincentive for men to get married and have families.
It isn't men not marrying and having families, it is women delaying or refusing marriage that is the root issue so I doubt your proposal would fix the problem.
Young women no longer see marriage as necessary to their lifelong economic and emotional prosperity so they are incentivized to compete for the top 10% of men rather than settling for the best of the remaining 90%. As they age, they realize their mistake but find it too late.
That’s one of the major issues. When I was on a dating app recently (stopped doing it as it was fruitless), most of the women are older 30s and 40s. Biologically speaking, by that age, they have lost most of their eggs and have precious few left. However, they boast of their jobs and owning houses, as if they expect a man to just fit into their lives rather than working together.
Realistically, if increasing marriage and childbirth rates were something we truly wanted to do, the #1 best thing would be to completely nuke the social welfare state.
People underestimate just how much economic uncertainty drives the formation and continuation of family networks.
In a nutshell, remove Daddy Government. Interestingly enough, it fits perfectly along libertarian lines and principles.
I'm not discounting your point, just saying an increasing number of men not wanting to get married and have families is also happening. The feminist movement that puts priority on career and not on family is a major cause of what we're seeing now, to be sure.
How about eliminating both child tax credits and SS?
How about a flat tax that only raises the money needed for constitutional government functions and leave the rest to each any every American to figure out or at least their state governments?
Is the Fairtax officially done?
I'm surprised children aren't being taxed as some kind of unrealized capital gain.
Don't give 'em any ideas!
Did I miss a portion of recent history where conservatives were suddenly anti-family/not pro-family?
I'm confused on what is meant by the statement "and represents a possible shift by conservatives toward more explicitly pro-family policy". Maybe she means "explicitly incentivizing families" policy but, true libertarian fashion, just because somebody doesn't/didn't hurl mountains of other people's money at a problem doesn't make them 'not pro-' or 'anti-'.
Feeding children costs twice as much, so they are doubling the deduction.
You really shouldn’t just be feeding your kids cheesy poofs.
But they like cheezy poofs.
So does Jeffy, by the 55-gallon barrel.
Only if the mother stays at home and actually raises the child.
Biden said there are no drones so don't believe your lying eyes
He also said he wouldn't pardon Hunter.
Note he never said his daughter account of him molesting her was false
Where did his daughter state he molested her?
In her diary while she was in a mental hospital
She didn't say he fucked her, but she wrote that he was always trying to shower with her as a tween and teen, and she resorted to only showering when he wasn't home just to avoid it.
She does infer more though and says that's the reason she became a sex addict.
"When the Zetas fill the skies
It's just our leaders in disguise
Fully loaded satellites
Will conquer nothing but our minds"
Call me when they release 99 red baloons
The German original of that song is so much better.
I agree but I can even spell in American, let alone german
99 Luftballons
Auf ihrem Weg zum Horizont
That song explains so much about the Gen X psyche.
Why not? It's not like he's ever mislead us, right?
About a month ago, residents of New Jersey started noticing substantial numbers of drones...
This is a more plausible and, I guess, visceral distraction than aliens.
Do they look like a big-top? When are we gonna see people wrapped up in cotton candy?
People in New Jersey have been panicking about aliens and drones since Orson Welles
This is different. There was no mass panic over the Orson Welles drama.
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-15470903.amp
You simply must enjoy the sheer delusion that's leading Adams to run for reelection; it probably won't go well, but his confidence is refreshing!
You can take the man out of the NYPD but you can't take the NYPD out of the man.
Well, this DC councilman plans to run in the special election to fill his now empty seat, after he won reelection while accused of bribery.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/12/16/dc-trayon-white-council-committee-expulsion/
A federal government department denies any involvement in the city of Yellowknife's handing out cigarettes as an incentive among the mostly Indigenous homeless population to participate in a Point-in-Time (PiT) count...
So suddenly smokem peace pipe is bad.
Where's Indian Princess Warren on this?
Canada's barely holding back MAID workers from giving people the Eric Garner treatment as it is.
Smallpox blankets it is then.
San Francisco is a city run by Marxist fags. Not a single human being cares about it, and if it fell into the ocean it would make the world a better place
I like the theory that the drones are searching for a missing nuclear warhead.
Most likely explanation is Congress needs to renew its laws against drones and where they can fly, so scaring the masses to reauthorize it.
Or remove the laws that prohibit shooting drones out of the sky.
BB shot is good for geese. Wonder how it is on drones.
Noah Smith citing the Financial Times citing who knows reporting from Kherson about Russian drones hunting civilians... because Lord knows neither the CIA nor the Ukranians would be so brazen as to target and destroy civilian and/or NATO infrastructure... is utterly predictable.
The Russian military is, yet again, on its heels, yet again, staving off an impending Ukranian victory, yet again, with it's last death rattle, yet again, but, somehow, it's now hunting civilians, civilians Z would almost certainly arm if he could, with legions of drones.
It's a straightforward narrative that you should just accept
secondthirdhand.Yeah, that struck me as propaganda. So all of the civilians in that city are being hunted by malicious drones operated by the Russians. But at the same time only 37 deaths (if these deaths even have anything to do with drone attacks) attributed out of 9500 "attacks." Either these are the worst drone operators in the world, or the drones aren't hunting and attacking the population.
Yeah the government claims on the one hand that there's nothing to see here and alternately nobody has jurisdiction to figure out what's going on. But they're also looking to expand their power.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nj-drone-invasion-just-time-congress-reauthorize-orwellian-law
The sum of all fears.
As always, The Bee is first and best -
https://babylonbee.com/news/drones-turn-out-to-be-elaborate-gender-reveal-party
...has anyone written the definitive account of how 2014-2024 was basically a lost decade for the city?
Self reflection on the left is not really a luxury we can afford with the looming Trump Era 2.0.
Don’t worry, Chicago is about to tell San Francisco to hold its Old Style regarding lost decades.
Poor Micheal Jordan took 12 years to sell his Chicago property, and had to drop $20 million off the price.
Somehow that is racism.
He is wrong. There is lots to show for it. All bad. And the lesson is that his ideology caused nothing but missery will be lost on him and others because they dare not admit how wrong they were and continue to be.
The New York Real Estate Mogul-In-Chief is going to ruin what people like Mayor Adams and Governor Newsome have made of places like New York, L.A., and San Francisco over the past several years!
It was a lost decade for people investigating Hunter Biden also.
For the record there has never been a double blind study on the vaccines currently used. And we all know the gov and pharmacy companies lied their asses off all through the wuflu.
Here's the problem. Every one of those citations quote themselves, ans none of them have any credibility.
I don't know if they cause autism, but I do know that the things cited are evil liars
Essentially this. Ignores the multitude of studies regarding t cell exhaustion from the number of vaccines as well.
Perhaps the issues aren’t so much what’s in these childhood vaccines, but that we’re overloading the poor kid’s immune system, if that’s the case.
It's something worth exploring instead of just telling everyone to shut up.
Like with Thiomersal too much of this is only investigated by the producers who may be liable if the product is found to have negative side effects.
exactly this to many vaccines to soon. many vaccines are unneeded unless you travel and the others can be given at larger intervals
..many vaccines are unneeded unless you travel..
Open borders brings the diseases here .
“Nuh uh, even if Democrats did it first.”
- Sarcasmic
Right, every one of those sources may have once been prestigious centers of science but are now hopelessly mired in leftist ideology and narrative building that nothing they say or do can be trusted or given validity.
Every single one of those sources need a conflict of interest statement on where the authors and/or publishers get their funding.
Vox, FactCheck.org, and NPR... There's a collection of "The Science" for ya.
The collective triumvirate for Lysenkoism. "THE science" is now equated with "studies show..."
My eyes glazed over after CDC and Harvard and I couldn't be bothered with the rest of these captured institutions were the best they could get.
.gov science is a caputred industry with goal seeked results. *but I don't think vaccines cause autism and real, actually tested vaccines are generally a good thing*
There's never been a double blind clinical trial that vaccines don't cause down syndrome either.
Some hypotheses are so preposterous that they don't need testing. Autism isn't something you develop. It's something you are born with.
A teenager opened fire at a Christian school in Wisconsin, killing at least two people and injuring six before committing suicide.
And she wasn't trans so we can talk about it.
Although I understand that Natalie identified as Samantha for whatever reason?
If Samantha was her middle name or something, they could just say that.
And they've pointedly NOT done so, which is why I said "for whatever reason?"
Media & cops let a lot of stuff out by what they don't say. You'll know immediately if a criminal is a white male citizen. If they don't say, chances are black or illegal alien. As an example...not ALWAYS, but often enough that the pattern is clear.
Local news this morning had a guy arrested for DUI that killed a kid. Hispanic name. Charges included the DUI, driving without a license, and driving without insurance. Wife asked if they said whether he was an illegal alien or not, I told her they had not stated. Pointedly had not stated it. But given the charges and name, if I was told he was an illegal alien I would not be surprised one iota.
My favorite is when they use a stock photo of a white guy looking all angry for a story where the perpetrator was a black guy.
“Madison’s chief of police was asked about comments online that suggest the shooter may have been trans.
“I don’t know whether Natalie was transgender or not,” Barnes said at a news conference tonight.
I don’t think that whatever happened today has anything to do with how she or he or they may have wanted to identify,” he said. “And I wish people would kind of leave their own personal biases out of this.”
Even being in the realm of "she or he or they" is enough to put someone into a higher tier of danger for this kind of stuff. The gender cult is a proxy for severe mental illness, and thats the whole point
The perfect shooter would be someone who was denied transition and who used an AR 15 to take out their "understandable" vengeance.
headline:
Was Natalie 'Samantha' Rupnow Trans? Wild Theories About Wisconsin School Shooter's Gender Surface Online as Police Say 'It's Not Important'
Despite a lack of evidence, claims that Rupnow was transgender have circulated online, a trend that has become common following school and mass shootings.
https://www.ibtimes.sg/was-natalie-samantha-rupnow-trans-wild-theories-about-wisconsin-school-shooters-gender-77482
Meanwhile, a law enforcement source told CNN that Rupnow had been struggling with personal issues for some time and expressed some of those thoughts in her writings that authorities are now reviewing.
A manifesto, which police have not yet confirmed is connected to Rupnow, has gone viral on social media.
Madison Police Chief Shon Barnes said that Rupnow, who went by the name Samantha, had been at the school since the start of the day. She later opened fire on a study hall filled with students from multiple grades.
Police confirmed that Rupnow had not been on their radar earlier, and there were no prior interactions with law enforcement.
If the answer is no, why throw all the extra pronouns in there?
Was she on SSRIs, and if so can we talk about THAT?
It’s a good question, and I doubt we’ll get an answer (as usual). How many of these shooters are on prescription drugs of some kind?
Funny how we still can't talk about that. We still don't talk about how some SSRIs increase suicide rates.
It should be mentioned that Madison Police were at the scene quickly and entered the school without hesitation. Madison is a liberal community as is its police force. But unlike other places the Madison Police are not afraid to put themselves at risk to save kids.
Soooo, you know for a fact that the cops who “entered the school without hesitation” were liberal?
Haha. That is so lame dude. What a stupid comment.
But he’s totes non-partisan!
Let me tell you what I know. The Madison Police department began reforming in the 1970s under Police Chief David Cooper and since that time has had a diverse, well trained and enlightened force. I was not commenting on the individual officers, but on the force that entered that school building within 30 seconds of their arrival. The Police in Madison did not hesitate as we have seen in other locations.
M. Nolan Gray
@mnolangray
·
Follow
I think things in San Francisco are finally turning around, but has anyone written the definitive account of how 2014-2024 was basically a lost decade for the city? It was showered with fabulous amounts of wealth, and has surprisingly little to show for it.
Not sure how this is a good question. It is obvious. Liberal mismanagement both economically and politically. Despite Pelosi directing billions, resources like water rights, and full liberal control, it is a failing city.
A federal government department denies any involvement in the city of Yellowknife's handing out cigarettes as an incentive among the mostly Indigenous homeless population to participate in a Point-in-Time (PiT) count," reports Canada's National Post.
They know free firewater draws them in.
They'll draw a lot more than the homeless in. Cigarettes are already insanely expensive in Canada, and doubly so in a far north city like Yellowknife.
Well, they have to hand them out right now as they can’t mail them.
Canada Post is a private corporation who operates like they're still owned by the government in the era of UPS, FedEx, DHL, etc. It's going to kill itself soon.
"For the furthest extremes of the American left, it doesn't matter that Luigi [Mangione] was a Huberman-loving center-right thinkboi hollowed out by pain and drugs, tragically lost to demons," writes Mike Solana at Pirate Wires. "Marxists have reshaped him into a folk hero, with songs of class war amplified across every corner of the social internet."
Center right how? Based on the extreme movement left my the left? Dude was shouting about his lived experience for fucks sake. A literal post modernist Marxist term.
Grew up in Maryland. "Prestigious" Ivy League. Against corporate health insurance.
Did he donate to act blue?
Another Republican Actblue donator.
All the political violence is coming from one direction only, but Sarc is very sure that Trump supporters will become violent.
Imagined crimes are way worse than actual crimes. And we need amnesty for those actual criminals and their bad acts.
Projection. Virtually everything the left denounces is simply an admission of things they are currently doing but that they don't want the other side to do.
Considering the source, Sarc, I much agree. Sarckles is the king of projection here.
Hey journalists can only report news given to them according to the homeless idiot. No digging or verification needed.
Lol, he literally just did this in the CNN article.
Predicting what Sarc will do isn't really a skill.
Marxists have reshaped him into a folk hero, with songs of class war amplified across every corner of the social internet.
Next you'll claim Che actually lined retarded kids against the wall.
"The libritarian aspects of Che and Mao"
By Jake sullum
Libertarians for socialist mass murderers.
Yes, sullum
He is a steaming pile of TDS-addled shit, ain't he?
"But tax credits are simply allowing people to keep more of their earnings, instead of the government being entitled to taking them. "
Except when they are refundable in excess of any taxes owed, at which point they are simply cash welfare payments with no strings attached. Also, applying them to FICA taxes means people aren't even paying into SS & Medicare.
Bring back the Herman Cain 9-9-9 Plan or Steve Forbes Flat Tax! Keep it simple, stupid. And for god sakes cut spending.
Whenever taxation is discussed, someone inevitably will posit "What we need is a 10% flat tax on all income, no exclusions, no deductions..." or a close facsimile of this statement.
More famous people like Steven Forbes and more recently Herman Cain, with his "999" plan, have advocated some variation on this theme. My problem with Forbes-like "flat tax" and even Cain's 999 plan is that it does not eliminate the income tax compliance costs (and sheer invasiveness) for individuals or corporations nor does it effectively reduce the complexity of the tax code.
A “flat tax” sounds nice. All your income taxed at one flat rate. What could be simpler? But a flat tax simply removes the progressive structure (different rates for different income levels and/or types of income).
This has two problems. First, much of the tax code exists simply to define what constitutes "income". Second, if anything is deductible, such as charitable donations, then much of the tax code will continue to be required to define exactly how this should work. Mountains of paperwork and 10s of thousands of pages of tax code will be involved in defining what is deductible, etc. just as it does today. Armies of accountants and attorneys and IRS agents will remain in place.
If you want to say "All income is taxable income" that's fine. But it probably won't work. The current tax code recognizes that not every penny that lands in your pocket represents "income". For pretty good reasons, the tax code endeavors to distinguish between gross income, net income (adjusted gross income) and taxable income (AGI less deductions).
As an example, if every penny that lands in your hands is taxable, then when Grandma gives little Johnny a birthday card with $10 in it, Johnny must file a tax return and account for that $10, and Grandma may be required to file a correspond 1099MISC to document that she transferred monies to Johnny. Failure to do so on either party's part obviously is tax evasion and a clear failure to comply with the tax code. If this situation is undesirable, then exclusions must be written and further, the definition of “gift” must be codified so as to avoid certain abuses that would inevitably occur.
Now consider the nature of a gift exclusion that allows small amounts to be gifted without a need to report as income on the part of the recipient (or file a 1099MISC). First, how small is small? $10, $100, $1000, is that indexed to inflation? Can Grandma give $1000 *and* Grandpa give $1000 each? How often can a gift be given? Or is the limit a cumulative annual amount? If it's $10, then lots of people will have to file 1099 and cause way more work than it's worth. If it's $1000, a lot of people will start black-marketing "gifts": e.g. maybe I can convince my boss to "gift" me the maximum amount every year? Etc. Etc.
If I loaned $750 to someone, who paid me back $1000 (i.e. repay $750 and pay $250 in interest), the $1000 check is not all income to me right? Income in this case would be $250, the interest paid, the other $750 is simply returning my money. What if I loaned my brother $5000, with a contract, interest payment and everything, then 5 years later decide that he doesn't have to pay it back? Is that a gift? Have I violated the gifting rules? Is that loan income to him? Is it a loss for me? Can I use it to offset other income? Etc. Etc.
What about a lottery winner, say $1000 on scratch off. Surely that's all income? But current tax law says that if he spent $750 buying tickets, the net gambling income is only $250. It cost $750 to "earn" $250. What if he won $1000 but lost $10,000? Current tax law says too bad on $9000, but he owes no tax on the $1000 winnings. Current tax law looks at your gambling income as if you were playing a long poker game: win or lose hands during the game, doesn't matter, what matters is what you have at the end of the game (tax year).
If my house burns down and the insurance company writes me a check for $100,000 is that income? What if the insurance pays more than I paid for the house? But what if it pays less than the house is worth?
More rules will be needed to clarify these situations too. That’s just defining “income”…and those are the easy examples.
If anything is deductible, say charitable donations, then another mountain of pages are required to spell out exactly how the deduction works, valuations to be used, etc. It’s easy enough to track cash donations (but current tax code has a lot of rules on those too, e.g. my donation to my alma mater is 80% deductible if I buy season football tickets, but 100% if I don’t). What is my deduction for used stuff given to Goodwill? Fiar market value? How is that determined? What valuation should be used for the Monet painting someone inherited from their grandfather’s estate when they donate it to a museum?
Think of the pages and pages of rules needed to define these elements, and the record-keeping needed to comply.
Unless you really mean a flat tax applies to all income regardless of source and nothing is deductible, then defining the various things that constitute gross income, net income, and taxable income will consume a large portion of the tax code and will continue to chew us up in compliance overhead. Futher even if you do mean all income, including Grandma's $10 gift to little Johnny bear in mind the thousands of 1099MISC forms that will need to be filed.
The benefit of a “flat tax” in this situation is negligible.
Interestingly, there's possibly some sign that young people are using less social media in general than in 2022...
Myocarditis and puberty blockers will eventually take the wind out of your posting sails.
They all went to mastodon.
You know who else went to mastodon?
Mike Salad?
The robot containing Hitler's brain?
House GOP accuses Liz Cheney of tampering with J6 witness, ask FBI to investigate criminality
“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report released by the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee and its chairman Barry Loudermilk stated.
"Evidence uncovered by the Subcommittee revealed that former Congresswoman Liz Cheney tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without Hutchinson’s attorney’s knowledge.,"
“This secret communication with a witness is improper and likely violates 18 U.S.C. 1512. Such action is outside the due functioning of the legislative process and therefore not protected by the Speech and Debate clause."
But she had good intentions, so…..
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Nah, she was just fed up. That's excuse enough to do things.
Let the RINO hunting begin.
That season should always be open and never end.
Wasn’t that the chick she gave a hug to after her testimony? Because that’s appropriate.
Yup. A couple of the cops they had testify perjured themselves too. One claimed he was brutally injured in the "rioting" while the Capitol CCTV footage showed him perfectly healthy and nowhere near any of the tussles.
The lights in the sky keep calling my name...
They're calling my name. I think they're coming for me
What's the difference between a birthday party and a terrorist camp?
Hell if I care I'm just the drone pilot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1NYhbiiiFw
BOC in all their 1980s glory...
Vaccine revisionism is no match for Community Notes...
Everyone we haven't censored agrees.
"some sort of nefarious political purpose" - tell me the community note was written by a drug company marketing department without telling me.
Vaccine hesitancy is at an all time high, but calling concerned people retards on community notes outta fix that.
https://x.com/trhlofficial/status/1868903858443022629?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
97% of Big Pharma paid actors agree: vaccines are harm-free.
Re: Drones...obligatory Black Mirror episode ref.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hated_in_the_Nation
Also mention Slaughterbots...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaughterbots
Also, the opening scene from Angel has Fallen.
You forgot the suicide booths in futureama
I was pleased to find that the "Hated in the Nation" link was not to the GG Allin album.
The slaughterbots movie likely has the scale of the drones wrong. Micro drones with just enough payload to cause a single death.
We'll know more about this 15-year old girl in 3 days than we know about Thomas Crooks after 3 months, and certainly more than we know about the DNC/RNC pipe bomber after 3 years.
It is a simple litmus test. If they tell you what happened it was a normal person. If you get no info it was the feds.
Liz, stop drinking the KoolAid.
* The kinds of drones which are that numerous and small are short-ranged. From whence would any attacker be sending them? Worrying about Chinese or Russian drones buzzing around New Jersey is just scare mongering. This is pure bullshit.
* Mangione was not center right. Quoting some clown who says that does not inspire confidence in your sources. Neither does constantly quoting the NYT.
* There is nothing refreshing about any corrupt politician (but I repeat myself).
Most criminals have lots of confidence.
They even call some of them “confidence men”.
From whence would any attacker be sending them?
A sub off the coast? Spies here in the US? Now I doubt they are but it isn't inconceivable and scaremongering aside drone swarms will be the future of warfare.
“drone swarms will be the future of warfare.”
And that future is now in both Syria and Ukraine.
Beyond that, Russia is clearly not trying to completely depopulate Kherson through the use of drones. Just look at what’s quoted: they’ve launched thousands of drone attacks for 4-5 months, and there have been 37 people killed. I’m far from the most protrusion person here but that take is just blatant war propaganda, trying to get us to picture Russians hunting people down like they’re Skynet.
And that’s not that I think Russia is particularly concerned about civilian casualties. But if they wanted to murder a ton of civilians they have so many more effective means of doing it. I can’t tell you what’s happening in Kherson, but that dramatized account is utter nonsense.
Yes, that 37 figure jumped out. If that's all drones can kill for all that effort, she's be better off worrying about people losing sleep from bed bugs.
They can depopulate it via fear just as easily as death. Fear probably has a better return on investment.
They don’t need drones for that. The city is still on an active frontline. Just keep shelling.
One bullet to one head once a week, rain, shine, wind, or snow would keep people inside even when it is raining for the low, low price of not even 50-some rubles.
Right, struck me right away as very inefficient. Perhaps DOGE could help.
Drones Or Go Elsewhere.
Mediocre Liz could level up to Good Liz if it wasn't for the constant NYT citations.
Honestly, why do people even bother quoting that local NYC rag that plays second fiddle in its own city?
It was annoying that she thought the NYT and WaPo paywalls were the only concern.
Liz, they're unreliable. Or to be more accurate, they are reliably wrong. They are bad sources, paywall or free.
'Center Right' in the modern day is still pretty far Left when Reagan Republicans are 'alt-right'.
Adams' best chance might be to switch parties. He obviously should feel zero loyalty to the Democrats at this point after they gleefully chucked him under the bus. And I think the GOP would likely be keen to throw a few bucks at the guy if it drains a ton of bucks from the Dems in order to try and hold onto NYC.
I have no doubt he's corrupt, but I have no doubt that the rest of the Democrats in New York are at least as corrupt if not more so. If you have 10 corrupt people, and 9 of them conspire to blame it all on the 10th, well that 10th guy, while not innocent, has a right to feel aggrieved.
Trump correctly predicted he would get indicted for something right after he came out and made the negative comment about illegal immigrants.
The amount of shady crap the NY city council is involved in is likely staggering. You simply don't get to those kinds of perches there without having your fingers in a lot of pies.
Like its recent massive relaxation of zoning laws?
Goddamn, I knew neocons were dumb, but this remark is nuclear grade.
"1,350% chance that child would develop autism"
That's some math there. 1350%?
I'm going to assume that the comma is used as a decimal point, they way some countries punctuate their numbers so that the value is akin to 1.35% as we would normally render it.
The question then is what is the chance of developing autism WITHOUT the vaccine? "The current autism rate in the United States is approximately 1 in 36 children, according to recent data from the CDC." That's about 2.77%. It could be high BECAUSE of vaccine usage, or vaccines may have no impact. A quick perusal of some studies abstracts seems to show that MAYBE vaccines correlate with a very small increase (1%) in autism risk vs unvaccinated. For every 100 unvaccinated children who develop autism, *maybe* 101 vaccinated children will, seems to be the conclusion.
You skipped a step. If someone were using the comma EU-style, that would be "1.350%" and no one writes that. As you yourself did, they drop the useless trailing "0".
So they meant "One thousand three hundred and fifty percent" and must have meant in comparison to something else.
I made the assumption because the studies I've seen have vax vs novax difference at about 1% (so I believed a 1.35% number).
1350% is an outrageous claim, like it came out of someone's ass.
I don't think that's necessarily so. If it's the difference between 1 out of 100 and 14 out of 100, that's a really big deal, and should be easy to show. If it's the difference between 1 in 100,000 and 14 in 100,000, it's still a "big" difference, but as one might say "a million times 0 is still 0". It really depends on the size of the numbers.
Ars Technica's Beth Mole reports:
Editors of the environmental chemistry journal Chemosphere have posted an eye-catching correction to a study reporting toxic flame retardants from electronics wind up in some household products made of black plastic, including kitchen utensils. The study sparked a flurry of media reports a few weeks ago that urgently implored people to ditch their kitchen spatulas and spoons. Wirecutter even offered a buying guide for what to replace them with. The correction, posted Sunday, will likely take some heat off the beleaguered utensils. The authors made a math error that put the estimated risk from kitchen utensils off by an order of magnitude.
Specifically, the authors estimated that if a kitchen utensil contained middling levels of a key toxic flame retardant (BDE-209), the utensil would transfer 34,700 nanograms of the contaminant a day based on regular use while cooking and serving hot food. The authors then compared that estimate to a reference level of BDE-209 considered safe by the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA's safe level is 7,000 ng -- per kilogram of body weight -- per day, and the authors used 60 kg as the adult weight (about 132 pounds) for their estimate. So, the safe EPA limit would be 7,000 multiplied by 60, yielding 420,000 ng per day. That's 12 times more than the estimated exposure of 34,700 ng per day. However, the authors missed a zero and reported the EPA's safe limit as 42,000 ng per day for a 60 kg adult.
The error made it seem like the estimated exposure was nearly at the safe limit, even though it was actually less than a tenth of the limit.
Again, see below. There are lots of unaccounted for and/or confounding variables woven in.
Vaccinating a child within 30 days after birth is, in this country, typically only done because the mother has HepB and/or active Hepatitis or other infection.
I didn't get my HepB vaccination until my late 20s/early 30s. I know my kids (in their teens) have never been vaccinated for HepB.
It makes *some* sense that autism or other developmental or mental disorder is *way* more frequent in these babies/pregnancies but the assertion that it's the needle or thimerosal or whatever, which I don't generally support or recognize as preferable or safe, is a bit spurious.
A bit of what's being glossed over here is the way "conservative" anti-science and progressive Science! and nativism/racism/elitism are bleeding together to generate pure stupidity. The original post points out that Japan doesn't fluoridate their water (and they aren't the only nation not to do so).
So, the real question (or question to avoid) becomes, especially with so many Americans drinking bottled and filtered water as well as other beverages, outside some cultural reverence for municipal, water-supply adulteration programs, why do we?
We still contaminate government water for the same reason saccharine was a carcinogen for 30 years and the tea tasting board survived for 27 years after its budget was zeroed (https://reason.com/2024/03/17/after-a-century-the-federal-tea-board-is-finally-dead/).
Both claims have problems. My only point was that the trailing zero is suspicious and works against your interpretation, and that "1,350%" is a perfectly common way of exaggerating a valid multiple, like people who say "it grew by 213%" instead of "it more than tripled" just to alarm their audience; it sounds more sciencey.
Except they didn't say 1350% more, they said 1350% CHANCE.
OK, three problems. You want perfection? Vote for Biden, get perfectly awful.
It's a misquote of Stossel's article, I think.
“They looked at children who got the hepatitis B vaccine during their first 30 days and compared those to kids who got it later or didn’t get it at all. There was a 1,350% elevated risk for autism!” -RFK
That was true, about the preliminary raw data. But in later analyses of the same data, Verstraeten made adjustments, and the vaccine-autism correlation went away.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/stossel-fact-check-rfk-jr/ar-AA1pJGup
Was the correction a grant from the pharmacy company?
Since a 1350% chance cannot exist, it is clearly a mistake, intended to indicate a 1350% greater chance, which, as has already been pointed out, is the difference between 1 in 1,000,000 and 14 in 1,000,000. It could be significant, it could not be significant. The post lacks sufficient context. But you want the focus on the part that is most certainly an error?
Why do you even bother to post when you are so fucking dumb, Mike? It is not like the tweet was claiming cops were killed with fire extinguishers and bear spray.
Mike Liarson is a squawking bird named Dee and should be treated as such.
That is, each baby was getting autism 13 and a half times.
A lot of innumeracy out there, too. Someone just wanted to make it seem more exact? Someone copied the number from a table formatted with 3 decimals? Someone did math and didn't think about the significant figures? Several viable reasons to have the extra 0 left on.
But I'm not hard up on my original interpretation either.
The "chance" word threw me. Seems to me than a "chance" will be somewhere between 0% and 100%.
Could be the increased likelihood above baseline
It is common to break large numbers into groups of three with a comma. That way hundreds, thousands, millions, billions, etc are easily understood. Like the current national debt of $36,135,779,021,745.
We do that in the English speaking world, but some use either periods or just spaces for it while using the comma as a delineator for decimals (where we use the period).
A 1350% chance of something ("1,350% chance") seems unlikely, don't you think? I have a 100% chance of dying sometime in my life, which seems to be about the worst odds possible.
There's also another issue being talked past here; Hepatitis B vaccinations generally aren't mandatory or advised (in this country) unless the mother has Hepatitis B and, my understanding, infants are more likely to contract HepB from a mother who has HepB and more likely to die from HepB than even toddlers and older-aged children.
Given the current climate and the direction things are headed, I know I'm being gauche in suggesting that taking some personal responsibility and avoiding HepB in the first place is the best policy, but we aren't talking about a first-world healthcare question of "Autism vs. no autism?" here. We're talking about a shithole cultural choice of "Do we trade a rise in child autism rates for a decrease in infant death rates?"
From Daily Wire:
The Biden administration is using its final weeks to haul a massive amount of border wall materials away from the southern border to be sold off in a government auction, an apparent effort to hinder President-elect Donald Trump’s effort to secure the border, The Daily Wire has learned.
Videos obtained exclusively by The Daily Wire from a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agent show unused sections of the wall being hauled away on the back of flatbed trucks from a section of the border just south of Tucson, a hotspot for illegal crossings during the Biden administration. The agent estimates that up to half a mile per day of unused border wall is being moved.
“They are taking it from three stations: Nogales, Tucson, and Three Points,” the border patrol agent, who was granted anonymity to speak freely, told The Daily Wire. “The goal is to move all of it off the border before Christmas.”
The good people of Tucson need to go protest at the removal sites.
Tucson is 70% far left and celebrates entities like La MecHa and other return Arizona to Mexico groups. See Raul Grijalva.
I'll admit, I unfortunately know very little about Arizona.
Mexico is paying for them.
The Babylon Bee had an interesting piece on this.
https://babylonbee.com/news/mysterious-user-orangeman47-snatches-up-all-border-wall-materials-in-online-auction
Section 2890 of the National Defense Authorization Act, introduced by Republican lawmakers in the House, requires the Department of Defense to develop a plan to use, transfer or donate all “covered materials” purchased for border barrier construction between fiscal years 2017 and 2022.
The law mandated that the Department of Defense submit a plan “to use, transfer, or donate to States on the southern border of the United States all covered materials” within 75 days of the National Defense Authorization Act’s enactment and begin executing it 100 days later.
The process continued “until the date on which the Department of Defense is no longer incurring any costs to maintain, store, or protect the covered materials.” This led to the eventual sale of a portion of these materials through GovPlanet, a government surplus marketplace.
After fulfilling requests from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and eligible border states, transferring nearly 60% of the materials, the Department of Defense sold the remaining 40% through a competitive sales contract.
“The material currently being sold through GovPlanet online auctions no longer belongs to the U.S. Government, and DoD has no legal authority to recall the material or stop further resale of material it no longer owns,” the Department of Defense told The Arizona Republic in a written statement.
As we all know, the Biden administration only does what is legal and will not do anything contrary to the law. Just ignore the attempted vax mandate for all large businesses, the student loan "forgiveness" that the SC told him was unconstitutional, and the extension of the eviction moratorium that he even admitted was likely unconstitutional but was going to do anyway since the court battle would take a while anyway.
Also, if everything you wrote is true (and I doubt a lefty like you would lie), why wasn't it all sold before the last minute of the lame-duck Biden's administration?
You do realize it's FY25 now, right, you stupid whore?
and represents a possible shift by conservatives toward more explicitly pro-family policy.
What, chucking Roe wasn't enough to give you that idea?
This reads like you are cheekely burrowing your head in the sand to maintain the cocktail invites.
"more" is an important word there.
I think she actually left out "incentivizing". Conservatives have always been very explicitly pro-family. Just not throwing money at it. Even highlighting how throwing money at single mothers is actually corrosive to families.
Yes, good point.
'Vaccine revisionism is no match for Community Notes'
Scanning down that list we see the CDC, NIH, NPR, Scientific American, and other once notable sources. If only they had not gone insanely woke and become government propaganda machines, their current statements might influence more people.
Now we have retards arguing with retards.
Newsome says California was doing DOGE before DOGE was a thing.
https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1868808127157780866
"Inflation reduction act" levels of blatant lying
Newsom, like turd, lies. It's what he does.
A Constitutional Convention? Some Democrats Fear It’s Coming.
Democrats believe ... Republicans could call a convention on the premise, say, of producing an amendment requiring that the federal budget be balanced, then open the door for a free-for-all in which a multitude of other amendments are considered, including some that could restrict abortion access or civil rights.
It ought not to surprise me how blatantly they mislead, as if a constitutional convention amends the constitution all by itself. All the amendments still have to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
Tricking the gullible since Tammany Hall.
They're presumably worried that a convention might propose popular, but unwoke, amendments.
Scared to death of different viewpoints, that other people might have different thoughts, that people might not be willing to be lead around by their betters.
I would suggest asking Kirkland about the “betters”, but then I remembered he got banned.
Did he?
Lol. What finally did it and how can we convince Sqrlsy to do it too?
These dumbfucks ought to be more afraid that the Republicans simply call for a national divorce at such a convention, tell the blue states to fuck off, and invite the red counties of blue states to join them if they wish.
"Top California Democrat: rescind Newsom’s call for US constitutional convention"
[...]
"(The Center Square) - A top California Democratic legislature called for the state to rescind all seven of the state’s open calls for a U.S. constitutional convention, citing risks to “Californians’ basic rights” and lack of controls for what a Republican-dominated convention might do.
Leading the charge is State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, who first abstained from then later voted against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest call for a constitutional convention to pass new gun control laws..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/top-california-democrat-rescind-newsom-s-call-for-us-constitutional-convention/ar-AA1vYtjL?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Weiner is not going to alter the bell-curve on 'intelligence', but even he seems to get the point that opening that can of worms means the bill of rights might get a few more entries, to the detriment of the D cause. Not so with grease-ball.
Ooops. 1 minute too late.
The CDC’s own data in 1989 showed that babies that got the Hepatitis B Vaccine within the first 30 days had a 1,350% chance that child would develop autism
Uh, maybe a more recent parent or worker who deals with blood borne illness or even just a Zoomer/Gen Alpha can update me but, this seems to be a bit of arguing past each other and Hepatitis vaccinations aren't required as part of a children's vaccination program, no?
Related question: Is there such thing as adult-onset autism or would my getting HepB vaccination in my late-20s/early 30s and becoming more of a self-assured, detail-oriented asshole just be a coincidence?
Re: related question: That’s called becoming a libertarian.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html
I am going to have my MMR titer checked at my next doctor visit. All adults probably need boosters. When children were getting vaccinated, we never had to worry about older folks getting measles, etc. I really don't want to find out how hard dealing with so-called childhood diseases at my age. Same with Tdap (Pertussis is another childhood disease floating around now).
I am unsure if Hep B vaccine is required, but it is recommended by the CDC at birth for all children. They also recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for all children at 6 months despite the fact that no infant ever died from COVID-19.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-schedules/child-easyread.html
Yeah, RSV? Pneumonia? HPV? that just seems like some completely made up, stupid, bullshit that no one anywhere is actually following.
Like their list of "most nutrient-dense" "powerhouse" foods that are disproportionately weighted against macronutrients and in favor of micronutrients of dubious efficacy.
Not that nobody should get vaccinated against any of it but, SSDD talking past each other, like Ron Bailey cursing the Lyme Disease vaccine falling out of use for lack of a market despite the CDC's claim that 400K people a year contract Lyme Disease (as calculated from reported cases, many of which didn't include tick bites or antibody tests).
Hawley- consider in view Friedman's negative income tax and it makes a bit more sense. However, like implementing a VAT and leaving Income Tax in place, it is incomplete and will do more damage than good.
Drones- the issue is people notice when things change. I live by the beach and there are planes and helicopters flying up and down the coast most days. When a couple military helicopters buzz by, it's loud and you take notice. If it happened 10 times a day, you'd think something is wrong. It's also likely apps like Nextdoor have something to do with this as people get alerted to events in their community. Presumably the people in New Jersey are saying what they''re experiencing is not normal. But that's what happens when you have an all-powerful gov't. Shut up and go about your business and I'll tell you what you're to believe.
Vaccines- shouldn't the Libertarian view be if people want to believe vaccines are bad, that's their business? If other people want to believe a post from the fever swamp and ignore their doctor's advice, that's their business too?
And if other people want to try to convince the people who think vaccines are bad that they are wrong, that's OK too.
>we're just not going to put radars, electronic warfare devices, and point defense cannons on every city block in the country.
No, we're not.
Just on the White House, Congress, and the blocks of the homes of the Senators and Representatives. I bet the rich parts of DC where the politicians live will be heavily protected while *your* neighborhood will have to fight federal regulations to do so.
the target of an experiment without precedent in modern European warfare: a concerted Russian campaign to empty a city by stalking its residents with attack drones."
more than 9,500 attacks with small drones, killing at least 37 people
There's a pretty big disconnect between the conclusion and the evidence.
Exactly what I was saying.
Oh, boo hoo for her...
WSJ:
Progressive Star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Defeated in Bid for Promotion
Rep. Gerry Connolly wins Democrats’ top Oversight committee job, besting New York lawmaker
WASHINGTON—House Democrats rejected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s effort to leapfrog into a prominent leadership role in the new Congress, siding with experience over progressive star power as the party prepares for two years under full Republican control of government.
Oversight? What is she qualified to oversee? AOC wasn't even a manager at the bar she worked at.
"...progressive star power..."
WHAT?!
Real progressive star power.
Invincible
The hilarious part about this is that Pelosi kneecapped her while lying in hospital bed in fucking Germany.
The great irony is that AOC is the logical result of Pelosi herself yanking the Dems way to the left over the last 20 years. Where AOC fucked up was not realizing that Pelosi's greatest priority is party loyalty, and didn't take kindly to AOC acting like a spastic in trying to get party members primaried by other DSA spastics like her. The last thing Pelosi would tolerate is some buck-toothed, sanpaku-eyed, jiggly-titted bimbo like AOC undermining party discipline and unity.
This is just a delaying action, though, contingent on whenever Pelosi either retires or dies in office. AOC is absolutely the face of the Democratic party now, and it's just a matter of time before she gains control of it as either House Speaker or Minority Leader. The only way Pelosi prevents that from happening is getting AOC drummed out on campaign finance violations or a similar scandal.
You simply must enjoy the sheer delusion that's leading Adams to run for reelection; it probably won't go well, but his confidence is refreshing!
When you live in the left-wing crazy district, always be afraid of the replacement. Always.
I think things in San Francisco are finally turning around, but has anyone written the definitive account of how 2014-2024 was basically a lost decade for the city? It was showered with fabulous amounts of wealth, and has surprisingly little to show for it.
Yeah, the Reason commenters did a pretty good job. I did what I could for Seattle that has suffered the exact same lost decade (which actually started around 2012, but I'm not going to nitpick here).
Oh, but since I know what you're REALLY asking is, has someone who's a notable public figure written and published an account, and yes, that person's name is self-described libertarian, Michael Shellenberger with his seminal tome, San Fransicko. Probably THE most definitive account you can find.
If you haven’t read the book, I strongly recommend reading it. It’s quite the eye opener on homelessness and the organizations involved. Shellenberger also has one on climate, Apocalypse Never, which is also rather good.
New book pile is getting low; those two just got added.
I did what I could for Seattle that has suffered the exact same lost decade (which actually started around 2012, but I'm not going to nitpick here).
Very well, "*three* weeks".
San Francisco's homicide rate has dropped 35% this year from its previous low level. It is headed for its lowest homicide numbers since 1960. It is likely to be as safe as New York City this year.
MAGA snowflakes melt when confronted either the fact that all the large US cities with low homicide rates are liberal cities.
Lol. Parody. ^
Sen. Josh Hawley
Just a reminder, and minor updates to the list:
Donald Trump, literally worse than Hitler
Ron DeSantis, literally worse than Donald Trump
Josh Hawley, literally worse than Ron DeSantis
Elon Musk, literally worse than Josh Hawley
So Elon Musk is four times worse than literal Hitler.
16x
or
2^4
I don't think "worse than" is necessarily an exponential function. Could just be Hitler +4.
Does is really surprise anyone that an African American is worse than the leader of The Master Race?
Where does Lindsey Graham fit in all that?
en. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) is pitching the idea of raising the child tax credit from $2,000 per child to $5,000 per child and allowing parents to take advantage of such credit not only once the child is born but also retroactively for the year prior when the mother was pregnant.
No. get rid of income tax. do not pay unproductive people who cant care for their own kids to have even more kids. Sounds harsh but paying these people to create more welfare recipients is a recipe for civilizational decline.
We're already importing plenty of poverty! No need to prop up domestic production.
I'll also say this about the drones: from what I've seen, they're obeying local laws about flight clearance and proper lights. It's unlikely any foreign adversary is following US regulations about drone usage.
What I suspect this is about is that there was some extra level of drone activity for a day or two, word starting spreading, and then people are hypersensitive to anything that looks like a drone (which is why a lot of people are reporting helicopters and aircraft as more drone sightings). It's the same attitude where you teach kids that the world is full of racism and suddenly everything they see or hear starts sounding racist.
If there's anything more to it than that, I hope to learn it before long, but if it's what I described, we'll basically never get an explanation because it's based on virtually nothing.
^+1. Occam's Razor.
This is exactly what an alien drone operator in a UFO would say.
He is probably right in his assertions of mass panic. His culture has advanced beyond all that you can possibly comprehend with 100% of your brain. Don't question it.
MORE children conceived and born for the PURPOSE of getting government money.
Stealing from your child's future income to buy a TV beer and cigs now what's not to like?
"take advantage of such credit not only once the child is born but also retroactively for the year prior when the mother was pregnant."
If a child is born in December 2024, it's mother wasn't pregnant with that child in 2023.
Biden had increased it to $3,000 and the Republicans forced that to end. Nice to see Hawley supporting a Biden initiative and taking it further.
Increase it to $0, and while you are at it, increase the individual deduction to $0 too!
Then eliminate ALL other deductions.