7 Ways To Mark the International Day To End Violence Against Sex Workers
December 17 is a day for mourning sex workers lost to violence and for drawing attention to conditions—like criminalization—that put sex workers at risk.

For two decades, activists have marked December 17 with demonstrations meant to mourn sex workers who have been killed and to help prevent future violence. It's known as the International Day To End Violence Against Sex Workers (IDEVASW), or sometimes just D17. Over the years, it's become a time for sex workers and their allies to organize, to educate, and to draw attention to conditions—such as criminalization—that make violence against sex workers more likely.
Today, I want to highlight some things that anyone can do to mark D17 this year.
You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.
Understand the Day's History and Significance
"December 17 is a day, where across the globe, sex workers, advocates and allies remember and mourn those that the sex worker community has lost over the last year," explains the Sex Workers Outreach Project (SWOP). "A list of names is compiled and read, candles are lit, and communities come together to make sure those we have lost are not forgotten." More:
December 17 began in 2003 in response to the sentencing of a murderer Gary Ridgeway, who was convicted of 49 separate murders, although ultimately, he is thought to have taken over 90 lives. When asked about his very specific targeting, he admitted "I picked prostitutes as victims because they were easy to pick up without being noticed. I knew they would not be reported missing right away and might never be reported missing. I picked prostitutes because I thought I could kill as many of them as I wanted without getting caught."
In response, Robyn Few, founder of the Sex Workers Outreach Project, and Annie Sprinkle were determined to make sure that the women who lost their lives were remembered, and their names said out loud. They organized a speak out in San Francisco, and encouraged people to hold vigils in their local areas. Since 2003, D17 has spread to become a day of global awareness and resilience for the entire sex work community."
SWOP's December 17 project "is a collaborative effort to continue this mission by maintaining a global resource of memorialized sex workers, a podcast telling the stories of their lives, and a blog with news updates about cases of murdered sex workers as well as information about the fight for sex workers' rights and safety."
For more on the day's history and meaning—with lots of links to sex workers' writing—check out Reason's previous D17 posts and follow the #IDEVASW and #D17 hashtags on social media tomorrow.
Show Up for a Demonstration or Vigil
D17 events range from virtual vigils and panels to in-person protests and parties. Some are designed solely for sex workers while others are aimed at a broader audience. (It's a good idea for non–sex workers to pay attention to event details so as not to show up where it's inappropriate. For the events listed here, I've noted the intended audience where I've seen it specified.)
Here are some of this year's virtual events:
• Silence, Violence, and Sex Workers' Rights: "An evening of art and resistance celebrating the lives of the fallen and providing actions to make our community safer." This virtual roundtable will be moderated by the New Jersey Red Umbrella Alliance and starts at 4 p.m. ET.
• COYOTE RI is hosting a virtual D17 event from 7 to 9 p.m. ET. You can register here.
• Sex Worker's Rights as Human Rights: "A conversation on International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers." This virtual panel, hosted by the International Studies Association, starts at 3 p.m. ET.
• Event in support of Chrystul Kizer: "Sex worker advocates Renee Olstead and Lotus Lain will host an online event…in support of Chrystul Kizer, an Illinois-based sex trafficking survivor who was jailed after killing her trafficker in self-defense. In addition to time spent with fellow sex workers, attendees will create handmade holiday cards which will be scanned and sent to Kizer." The card-making meetup is aimed at sex workers, but the sign-up sheet also welcomes non-sex workers who want to show support.
• Trans Equity panel: Transequity and Victoria Von Blaque will be hosting a virtual panel at 4:30 p.m. ET.
• All-day SWOP event for members of the sex work community: SWOP is hosting "an all-day event to celebrate the resilience of the sex work community." It kicks off on Zoom tomorrow at 11 a.m. ET. "Anyone who is part of the community is encouraged to attend and celebrate the resilience of the sex work community," the event page says.
And here are a few non-virtual happenings in the U.S.:
• Chicago Protest Vigil: Support Ho(s)e Chicago is holding a protest vigil in downtown Chicago at 7 p.m. CT. "Open to current/former [sex workers] and accomplices," the event flyer says. "Masking required for safety and anonymity."
• Minneapolis Candlelight Vigil: "SWOP Minneapolis is hosting a candlelight vigil to honor Sex Workers who didn't survive 2024 and a ceremony of recommitment to fighting like hell for the living." The vigil kicks off at 7 p.m. at 2110 Nicollet Avenue. "This is a space for remembrance, resistance, and solidarity, and it's open to everyone," the group says on Instagram. "Whether you're a sex worker, an ally, or just someone who believes in dignity and safety for all, you're invited to join us. Bring flowers, bring your support, and stand with us as we demand an end to violence against sex workers. Let's show up for those we've lost and fight harder for those still here."
• Voices of Resilience: Empowering Sex Workers through Advocacy: The D.C.-based harm-reduction group HIPS is hosting an in-person event and panel on December 18. It kicks off at 6 p.m. at the Southeast D.C. restaurant as you are.
• Austin Candlelight Vigil: SXHX Collective is holding a candlelight protest vigil in Austin, Texas, tomorrow night. It takes place from 7:30 to 8:30 p.m. CT in Austin's Republic Square Park. "All sex workers and those who love us welcome," says the event flyer. "Dress warmly, bring signs honoring loved ones, candles and blankets provided."
• D17 Candle Ceremony and Holiday Mixer in Greenwich Village: Hosted by the Judson Memorial Church's Sex Worker Alliance, this event will take place from 6 to 9 p.m. ET in at Judson Memorial Church in Greenwich Village. "We invite you to join with Judson's sex worker alliance—the community of entrepreneurs, artists, activists and allies in a candle ritual…convened by Veronica Vera," the group says on Facebook. "Attendees will be invited to decorate candles as a poetic gesture of remembrance and love. This will be followed by a community mixer indoors with refreshments, socializing, information-sharing and entertainment."
• McCarren Parkhouse event: Equality New York, Red Canary Song, Decriminalize Sex Work, and other groups are hosting an event from 9 p.m. to midnight ET in Brooklyn's McCarren Parkhouse.
Follow Sex Work Writing on Bluesky
Why Bluesky? Because most social media platforms either explicitly or covertly suppress content by sex workers and about sex work. Bluesky's chronological feed—as opposed to the more algorithm-driven engines powering many other platforms as the default—means that who you follow is who you get, which makes sex work content suppression less of a threat.
I have made a (by no means complete) Bluesky list of people—including sex workers, activists, and academics (not mutually exclusive categories, of course)—who write about sex work and sexuality, to get you started. Writer and photographer Gustavo Turner has a much more extensive "starter pack" here. If you're looking to start following just a few accounts, you can't go wrong with Turner, SWOP USA, Maggie McNeill, Jessica Stoya, Angela Jones, and Mike Stabile.
Subscribe to Sex Work Newsletters
Subscribing to sex-work news and advocacy newsletters also ensures that you get to see the updates you want to see, since they'll be delivered directly to your inbox instead of showcased at the whims of an ever-changing algorithm. Following the organizational newsletters for various sex worker rights groups is a great way to stay abreast of political and legislative developments related to sex work, including new ways police and politicians are trying to limit sexual and economic freedom in the name of "protecting" women and the ways that activists are trying to fight back. I recommend starting with the Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics Rhode Island (COYOTE RI) newsletter on Substack, the Old Pros newsletter, and the Decriminalize Sex Work newsletter. (And of course Reason's Sex & Tech newsletter too!)
Break Out Your Wallet
COYOTE RI, HIPS, SWOP-USA, Support Ho(s)e, Decriminalize Sex Work, Old Pros, Trans Equity, the New Jersey Red Umbrella Alliance, Red Canary Song… Today's newsletter is full of links to nonprofit groups that could use your donations. Some of these groups also sell cool merchandise promoting sex worker rights, in case you'd like to shop for a cause.
Read We Too: Stories of Sex Work and Survival
The book club I help run just finished reading We Too: Essays on Sex Work and Survival. It's a fabulous collection of sex worker–penned essays that tells stories of struggle, of liberation, and of everything in-between. This is powerful and nuanced writing that explores the complexities of consent, skewers the supposed bright line between victimhood and empowerment narratives, and showcases the problems in mainstream feminist and law enforcement efforts at "protecting" sex workers. I recommend it for anyone interested in issues surrounding sex work in the U.S. and beyond. Essays cover everything from stripper labor organizing to criminalizing sex trafficking survivors to the promise and problems of "feminist" porn and much more.
Watch CLassified: The War on Backpage.com
Reason's recent documentary looks at the feds' takedown of Backpage—a classified ad platform that was popular among sex workers—and the criminal case against its founders. The tale has relevance far beyond this particular website and those involved, showcasing the playbook that politicians and prosecutors are using to quash online speech about sex more broadly—and how, far from protecting sex workers, this crackdown puts them at more risk.
More Sex & Tech News
• The Justice Department has reached a settlement agreement concerning assets seized from former executives of Backpage. "$215 million in assets traceable to Backpage's profits, and previously seized by the government from Backpage and its agents, will be forfeited to the United States," the department reports. "The forfeiture represents more than 80% of the value of the property seized or restrained in the case."
• Jessie Sage covers the controversy around OnlyFans performer Lily Phillips, who slept with 100 men in a day and made a documentary about it. "When anti-porn feminists and conservative Christians are both chomping at the bit to shut our industry down, [sex workers] are loathe to be honest when we have a bad day on the job, fearing that this information will be used as ammunition," writes Sage. More:
Perhaps the remarkable thing that Phillips did in this film was not have sex with 100 men, but rather break the fourth wall, allowing people outside the industry to see her vulnerability and her complex feelings about her labor. She allowed us to see her learn on the job, and work through her feelings about it, while still asking folks to recognize her humanity and agency simultaneously. Maybe by going to the extremes, she showed the world just how difficult and nuanced this line of work really is. Perhaps more of us should be this brutally honest about the complexities of our jobs.
• "A Montana law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors will remain temporarily blocked, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday, after justices unanimously agreed with a lower court judge who found the law likely violates the state's constitutional right to privacy," reports the Associated Press. "The case against the Montana law now goes to trial before District Court Judge Jason Marks in Missoula."
• Activists in England and Wales are protesting the use of "police cautions," which can be issued "to anyone they have 'reasonable cause' to believe has broken prostitution laws, meaning little evidence is required," reports The Guardian. "Police cautions, which are typically issued for minor crimes, are filtered out from someone's record after six years and do not need to be disclosed to employers, but a prostitute's caution will show up on a sex worker's enhanced [Disclosure and Barring Service] check until they are 100 years old."
• A federal appeals court has rejected a sex trafficking case against the video chat platform Omegle, in another win for a narrow reading of the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA).
• Donald Trump wants Mark Meador to become a Federal Trade Commission commissioner. "Meador is an accomplished antitrust litigator, but his antagonism toward Big Tech, and bigness per se, will compromise Trump's stated goals of maintaining America's economic and technological dominance," writes Reason's Jack Nicastro.
• Arena magazine is a refreshing read if you are frustrated with the doomerism, tech panic, and casual anti-market sentiment that tends to permeate both mainstream and avant-garde media.
Today's Image

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What we saw w8th Lily Philips was a woman tearing up up and saying it was an experience that she would not recommend. Perhaps it should be legal, but it is not a physically, emotionally or spiritually healthy way of life.
100 in 24 hours is one about every 14 mins with no breaks. I hoped she screened for one pump chumps.
8. Keep legal records of clients and health checkups.
Well isn’t that what legalization would require, like doctors visits?
And tattoo numbers?
Are Jews doing that now to Palestinians in their holocaust in Gaza?
No. Will you be doing that when you River to the Sea the place?
Why don’t you recite that meme in its entirety.
We’ll just compare it to what Jews are doing in Gaza.
Nothing? Aside from the horrible massacres of dolls, store mannequins and the same kid 50 times over.
All in eh?
Hahaha
She did it raw, which is weirdly gutsy.
And she wants to do 1000 in 24 hrs next year or so.
Oh wow! that's even grosser than I thought. Can you imagine how much spooge the idiots from 20 on were smearing themselves with. I can't imagine anything I'd want to do less than be #2 onward.
She did an interview with a YouTuber afterward and said her eyes were a bit blurry from getting splooge in them.
She didn't screen for AIDS what makes you think she screened for anything but availability?
8 yrs. after the creation of OF and almost 20 yrs. after the first 'camgirl' the idea that Lily Philips is groundbreaking for shattering the 4th wall is actually 4th-wall-rebuilding bullshit.
Rolling Stone isn't some insightful culturally relevant journalistic paragon, it's actually kinda depressingly hilarious the ENB is citing them. And Lily Philips isn't some strong pioneer of any sort of... anything. At best she's yet another iteration of circus sideshow act or freakshow. Like Tom Green or Johnny Knoxville or Andy Bowen, notable only for being slightly more sensationalistically pointless or stupid than outright disregarded.
ENB isn't old enough to be a Boomer, but she's one in spirit.
I'm doing my part. I've never once murdered a prostitute nor even slapped a 'ho.
Sometimes the hooker just dies.
ENB still doesn’t understand that anything goes when it comes to hoes. And where the hell is my sandwich?
Not certain I’m ready to go cold turkey, but I guess i could scale it back a bit.
But if you can't rape the hooker you paid to fulfill your rape fantasies, whom can you rape?
'7 Ways To Mark the International Day To End Violence Against Sex Workers'
Is slapping gonna cost extra?
No one cares but you, Liz.
International Day To End Violence Against Sex Workers already? And I just took down my World AIDS Day decorations.
The holidays are just flying by aren't they?
It's a Hallmark conspiracy.
Seriously. It’s always whores with her. Just like the Rosato brothers.
Bluesky???!!!! Mastadon is the future!
Zero surprises ENB moved to Bluesky. It is the Truth Social for Democrats.
"B-b-b-b-but most social media platforms either explicitly or covertly suppress content by sex workers and about sex work."
Not X.
ENB: SEKSHUH 230 IZ MUH 1A OF TEH INTERWEBZ!
Also ENB: SOSHUL MEDI-UH PLATFORMS EXPLISSITLEE OR COVERTLY SUPPRESS CONTENT!
Also, also ENB: BUILD YOUR OWN INTERWEBZ!
Also, also, also ENB: SEKSUALIZING CHILDRUN IZ FREE SPEECH!
Also, also, aslo, also ENB: END VI-UH-LENCE AGAINST SEX WORKERZ! SEX WORK IZ WORK!
This whole libertarian feminist personality or identity she's cultivated just needs to be put out of its misery.
The 17th is also National Maple Syrup Day, Wright Brothers Day and Device Appreciation Day.
I’m sure there’s a way to combine them all.
Use the syrup to lube the vibrator you're using on the hooker while joining the Mile High Club.
Sounds sticky.
ML is the maple syrup ambassador, right?
I live 2,000 miles away from the sugar maple's native range. If you want an ambassador Chumby and Sarc are from Maine, and Sarc is probably already sticky.
"A Montana law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors will remain temporarily blocked, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday, after justices unanimously agreed with a lower court judge who found the law likely violates the state's constitutional right to privacy," reports the Associated Press. "The case against the Montana law now goes to trial before District Court Judge Jason Marks in Missoula."
My Marxist utiopia where we all knowingly repeat the lie continues apace.
A: There is no such thing as "gender affirming care". There is merely cosmetic surgery that's done to help assuage someone's desire to not be the sex they are.
2. Even if one did believe that you can become a different sex by simply willing it to be, how are you 'transgender' if you haven't had the 'gender affirming care' yet? If cosmetic surgery for minors is blocked, then how is any minor 'transgender' until they get the parts cut off and grafted on? Explain, show your work and be precise.
"how are you 'transgender' if you haven't had the 'gender affirming care"
It seems to be more a matter of feeling than whether one has undergone this or that medical procedure. Some people feel more comfortable, more whole taking on the identity of a gender that doesn't comport with their physical equipment.
Nobody feels "more comfortable" after incredibly painful and useless surgery that doesn't treat the underlying mental illness, and results in a lifetime of antibiotics and no actual functioning sexual organs.
In that case the surgery will disappear over time as the inefficacy of it becomes widely known. No need to involve judges, lawyers, police or politicians. Leave medical matters to doctors and patients.
That's great if you have no compassion for all the people who will be poisoned and mutilated while "the inefficacy of it becomes widely known." Or for all those who are so mentally ill that they won't consider or care about the "inefficacy". You're sick.
"That's great if you have no compassion for all the people who will be poisoned and mutilated while "the inefficacy of it becomes widely known."
I have compassion for people who are suffering. I'm just not one to interfere with the decisions they and their doctors make. Sometimes people will make medical decisions I disagree with, like Jehovah's Witnesses refusing to allow blood transfusions. But I even more I disagree with forcing someone to follow my personal preferences when it comes to medicine or any other field. Sometimes medical treatments sound absolutely hideous and barbaric, and I would never want to subject myself to them. But, at least on some patients, they work. I'm thinking of electroshock therapy for the severely depressed. Again, it's not something I'd want to go in for, but I'd want it to be my choice rather than having to accept the dictat of pandering politicians, judges and cops.
You're sick.
In that case the surgery will disappear over time as the inefficacy of it becomes widely known."
Leaving hordes of mutilated victims in their wake. If a competent adult makes the decision to butcher their body it's one thing, but it's confused gay teens and the mentally ill who are actually being targeted by the trans ideologues.
There are no competent adults who believe they belong to the opposite sex.
Some adults feel more comfortable with adopting a gender not in line with their sex. Not my cup of tea, but it's none of my business.
They make it everyone's business by invading the private spaces of the opposite sex, and trying to impose punishments on those who won't publicly endorse their delusions.
In other words, it's 'they' you object to. The surgery is just a red herring.
You're correct—those are other words, not mine.
"Leaving hordes of mutilated victims in their wake."
You're getting hysterical again. You are vastly overestimating the number of people who would go in for such surgery. And if they want to, who am I, a proponent of individual freedom of choice, to object? It's you and your judges, police, lawmakers, politicians and other puritanical scolds, not me. People have long been mutilating themselves and their children, often as a matter of routine, as with the circumcision of infants. There's also transhumanists, gene therapy, tattoos and piercings that are all the rage these days.
I suggest you let the gender confused muddle their way through life with the freedom to do as they wish with their bodies. You would do better to focus your energies on the questions that concern us all: what's with the declining birth rate, why are young people becoming less interested in sex, and what about the world wide decline in sperm counts?
"You're getting hysterical again."
Oh? Then what do they do to the sexual organs and breasts of the people being 'gender affirmed'?
You do know that an artificial vagina is constructed by splitting the penis into quarters and inverting it and finishing it off with bits of colon, and it never fully heals, hair often grows inside, it's constantly infected and requires a lifetime of antibiotics, right? Just like circumcision or tattoos, right, you fucking monster?
And you do know that an artificial penis is made out of a chunk of the thigh, requires a pump to get it hard, and you get no sexual stimulation for using it, right?
Add to that near toxic levels of hormone treatments, and chemotherapy drugs to arrest sexual development, and you have a sickly, mutilated mess. And all they needed was someone to tell them that they are gay, not a woman trapped in a man's body.
You're one sick fuck, buddy.
"Oh? Then what do they do to the sexual organs and breasts of the people being 'gender affirmed'?"
None of my business. Ask a doctor.
"You do know that an artificial vagina is constructed by splitting the penis into quarters"
Perhaps in time techniques will improve. But it's not the technique you object to, is it?
There is merely cosmetic surgery that's done to help assuage someone's desire to not be the sex they are.
Or, more often the case for this Montana law - assuaging the desire of parents to virtue signal by pimping out their kids to a creepy sex cult that worships child mutilation.
There is no such thing as a "transgender minor." They're like vegan cats. We know who's really making the decisions.
Do you think parents prefer their children to be confused over issues of gender and sexuality? And if so, why stop at banning such surgery? It would make more sense preventing such parents from having children in the first place given the fact that they will likely find ways to abuse their children even if the surgery is banned. It's not such a big step, we already register, imprison and castrate sex offenders.
https://wondermark.com/c/1062/
means that who you follow is who you get, which makes sex work content suppression less of a threat.
So, you went to the most censorious platform to better follow accounts because the censorious platform's algorithm is more straightforward. El oh fucking el.
North Korea is the best place to consume media, because the choices are much more straightforward as there's no algorithm and what you read is what you get.
This one's going down in infamy, kids.
Bluesky is the most censorious platform out there. It even beats Facebook. ENB should just be honest about her motives.
"Bluesky is the most censorious platform out there. It even beats Facebook."
Isn't that a good thing? If Bluesky allows its users more control over their feed, what content is filtered and what passes through, isn't that better and more liberating than relying on Facebook's algorithm?
Are you being an idiot on purpose? You can block people on every social media platform.
Those clowns are going to Bluesky solely because they're mad that Twitter stopped censoring other people's speech.
"Those clowns are going to Bluesky solely because they're mad that Twitter stopped censoring other people's speech."
To each his own. If people want to register with Bluesky, I have no objection, whatever the reason that motivates them. I'm sure on reflection, you'll agree with me.
"You can block people on every social media platform."
Apparently, Bluesky gives users more power to filter out the content they don't want. For them it's preferable to letting an algorithm do it for them.
Even on Reason you can block people. The only reason you guys love Bluesky is because you know it isn't just stopping you from hearing the voices of your social and political enemies, it's stopping everyone.
You're mad that other voices are allowed to speak.
"Even on Reason you can block people. "
I'm aware of that. Can you filter content that you don't want to see? No, but I believe you can on Bluesky. You do it yourself and don't have to rely on an algorithm to do it for you. That's what I've gathered by my quick look into the matter. I don't follow any social media, so you may want to check for yourself.
"The only reason you guys love Bluesky is because you know it isn't just stopping you from hearing the voices of your social and political enemies"
That's a fine reason, especially if other social media platforms rely on an algorithm to do their version of the same thing. Users' control of their own feeds is a wonderful thing, and I don't understand why you find it so objectionable.
"You're mad that other voices are allowed to speak."
No, I'm not angry, I promise you. As you point out, Bluesky is not the only platform that gives users the option of muting objectionable voices. It's a positive feature, and if you haven't availed yourself of it, I think you should give it a try.
Bluesky mutes wrongspeak without any user input necessary, you censorious fascist, and I know you know that. Why are you trying to be deceitful?
"Bluesky mutes wrongspeak without any user input necessary"
Sounds like every other social media platform. Also traditional media including TV and newspapers.
I'm not trying to be deceitful. I am not a user of Bluesky or any other social media, and have stated so plainly. So please bear with me.
I'm waiting for the day where the article comes out where sex workers should have the right to collect money from their clients even if the sex workers refuses to have sex with the client. Basically, I'm waiting for sex workers to demand money for things that are neither sex nor work.
Who cares if they don't collect money, it puts sex workers in a special category, which we're repeatedly told, they're not. It means that sex work is somehow different than working in a Starbucks, which we're repeatedly told, it's not.
It is different. There's more salesmanship in sex work. It's more entrepreneurial. Fucking and sucking are the easy parts.
You ever notice how, like drag queens trying to groom children at story hour, feminists never talk about actual problems in actual industries?
There are no feminists out there saying "More women should be nurses!" or "More women should be elementary and pre-K teachers!" or "More women should be dental hygenists!"
It's almost like, for all the talk about libertarian principles and conservatives who want to dictate women's agency in the bedroom, feminists are the one's who will defend false rape allegations as free speech in order to avoid even the idea of any woman having a regrettable experience between the sheets (like such a thing never happens to a man).
" I'm waiting for sex workers to demand money for things that are neither sex nor work."
That's what pimps are for.
Perhaps the remarkable thing that Phillips did in this film was not have sex with 100 men, but rather break the fourth wall, allowing people outside the industry to see her vulnerability and her complex feelings about her labor. She allowed us to see her learn on the job, and work through her feelings about it, while still asking folks to recognize her humanity and agency simultaneously. Maybe by going to the extremes, she showed the world just how difficult and nuanced this line of work really is. Perhaps more of us should be this brutally honest about the complexities of our jobs.
Just a complete load of bullshit. Assigned agency to a whore. Her dad is the true victim.
Her dad is a sex worker?
Clown question
I think that taxi drivers may have a lesson for sex workers. If a taxi driver finds himself in trouble, he puts out a call to fellow drivers and they rush to his location, ready to assist. If our sex workers were to form such a union and be willing to work together, they could make similar arrangements without having to rely on a brutal and corrupt police department.
Jessica Stoya
JFC. What's with the fake, low-rent clingers? It's like these women, Taylor Lorenz, Brianna Wu, Jessica Stoya... were all cut from the same shitty mold.
Patently falsely claim to be tech-savvy, maybe get naked for someone on camera once or twice somewhere, pile on to some allegations against someone, cash-in as a third-rate journalist until people forcefully put you in your place.
This is like the stupidity of Monica Lewinsky co-producing the Knox story. No industry or even fraction of society can function this way ENB and until you drop the nuclear hammer on this bullshit, sex work is never going to be work. You don't get to suck the President's dick 30 yrs. ago and then ride the victim/fame wave for the next 30. You show up, you flip the hamburgers, you salt the fries. If Hitler shows up and orders fries, you salt them and shove them across the counter. Nobody gets famous being the fry cook who served Hitler that one time or who once worked in that risque breastaurant or strip club for a summer to put themselves through college.
When is "The International Day To End Violence Against Trans Sex Workers"?
For ENB it's every day that ends in Y.
Oh, weird, that's the same day as International Violence Against Mimes Day!
Is Wayne Brady going to have to choke a bitch?
What other dangerous professions should we memorialize ? LEOs? How about a day for commercial fishermen? Roughnecks? Electricians? Roofers?
How about a day for soldiers? The state sends these people to camps where they are collectivized in the most profound way, their individuality is under constant attack, and when they are ready, they may be send to kill or be killed according to the wishes of others. The end result is a suicide rate which is astonishingly higher than the general population. Only sex workers are comparable.
Loggers.
"I have made a (by no means complete) Bluesky list of people—including sex workers, activists, and academics (not mutually exclusive categories, of course)—who write about sex work and sexuality, to get you started. Writer and photographer Gustavo Turner has a much more extensive "starter pack" here. If you're looking to start following just a few accounts, you can't go wrong with Turner, SWOP USA, Maggie McNeill, Jessica Stoya, Angela Jones, and Mike Stabile."
Maybe they should go to a platform that is not toxic and hateful...
Remember the early days of Twitter? When the technology was so "revolutionary" and groundbreaking that people were tweeting at each other what they had for breakfast? Tweeting was the future and how the Arab Spring circumvented media blackouts.
Somehow compiling and sharing your following list in your traditional, blog-style magazine writing, especially after your failed "How to leave Twitter for Mastodon." article, just feels... desperate.
I'm going to need to some proof that she had sex with 100 men in a single day. No way a human body can handle that without some adverse effects.
100 sex acts, maybe. Not intercourse.
Yeah, with all the ways to deceitfully edit videos, or even create computer images, it could be fake and embarrass people who didn't know it was fake.
I was thinking the opposite. Given the variety and degree of sex acts, into antiquity, this can't be that exceptional. Not that there wouldn't be any adverse effects but that the real mania or adverse effect is pre-existing.
Again, I think mostly it's a publicity stunt for Philips and women like ENB who like to think being a bottomless jizz receptacle is women seizing their own agency and/or the reigns of power.
for drawing attention to conditions—like criminalization—that put sex workers at risk.
Are we going to draw attention to their poor life choices? Because that seems like it puts a lot more people at a lot more risk than criminalization.
I actually support this D17 thing, ENB. It's the perfect vehicle for encouraging strippers, prostitutes, escorts, and pornographers to get out of this horrible trade and minimize the risk and harm that is a natural extension of it.
I didn't see that in your article though. Weird.
How about no-questions carry permits for ladies in general? Samuel Colt's equalizer is the original Equal Rights Amendment derived from 2A. Nothing quails a girl-bullier like the possibility of unequal-yet-apposite reprisal force.
Sounds a lot like saying "I do believe in fairies" for all the repeal of legalized violence it can accomplish. Voting libertarian repeals violent laws and shores up rights. Marching in streets is what coercive looters love to see instead of what actually matters and makes a difference. Nobody cared about legalizing weed until after Waffen Bush wrecked the economy urging cops to confiscate grow houses till mortgage-backed securities tanked. That changed in 2008, then bigtime in 2016.
Darn, I forget to buy any Whore Day presents, and now the shops are all closed.
You still have Mother's Day. Two birds, one stone.