Trump Appointees Kash Patel and Massad Boulos Are Not Neocons
Trump's picks for FBI director and Middle East adviser buck his trend of appointing superhawks.

President-elect Donald Trump's first few national security staffing picks were neocon restorations. He filled his administration with figures who wanted a return to the heady old days after 9/11, when every problem in the world had a U.S. military solution. But over the Thanksgiving vacation, Trump choose two new senior officials who might push back on the foreign and domestic war on terror.
Kash Patel, the former prosecutor and Pentagon official whom Trump chose to lead the FBI, wants to roll back a large part of the surveillance state. And Massad Boulos, the father-in-law of Trump's daughter who has been tapped to be senior adviser on Middle Eastern and Arab affairs, signals a willingness to engage in serious negotiations over the region.
As a congressional staffer, Patel had helped write the "Nunes memo," a report by Rep. Devin Nunes (R–Calif.) claiming that the FBI had improperly spied on a Trump campaign staffer during an investigation into Russian influence. Nunes and Patel were particularly focused on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, which provides secret warrants for wiretapping suspected spies.
Although the FISA court was set up in the 1970s to restrain government power, it has become a "kangaroo court with a rubber stamp," in the words of NSA whistleblower Russ Tice; FISA judges have approved around 99 percent of all government requests. In 2011, the court secretly and massively expanded the NSA's ability to spy on Americans.
"Unfortunately, when you have the police officers, the cops in this country, break the law, we can't rely on themselves to police themselves. That is a communist form of police representation," Patel told Fox News in December 2023. "What we have to have done is for Congress to put forth a bill that put in cops from Congress in the FISA process at the FISA court limiting their abuse of this power."
In his book, Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy, Patel calls for the FISA court to include "standing public defenders who act as advocates for the accused," to collect written transcripts of all its proceedings, and to have "nonpartisan national security lawyers who report directly to the White House or the attorney general" randomly check search warrants.
Patel also wants to impose much greater congressional oversight on the FBI in general, and to close down the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, sending agents to work in field offices instead.
Perhaps the best clue to Patel's approach is how disturbed the FBI brass is about his ascendancy. "People are tired of the politics on both sides inside the FBI is what I've heard, and they are worried this is going to be more infighting and more of a distraction," former FBI hostage rescue agent Rob D'Amico told MSNBC after Patel's nomination. "It's a frustration inside the FBI with how hyper-partisan our politics have become, and this nomination is the latest example of that," D'Amico added.
Boulos, meanwhile, serves as a bridge to Middle Eastern factions that Washington normally doesn't talk to. The father-in-law of Tiffany Trump, he was born in Lebanon and has extensive political and business connections there. However, his political career "does not exactly indicate a firm commitment to either side in Lebanese or regional politics," writes Aron Lund of the nonprofit The Century Foundation.
Lebanese politics is complicated. The Boulos family have been key fundraisers for the Free Patriotic Movement, a Christian party that was historically allied with the Iranian-backed party Hezbollah but might break that alliance soon. Boulos himself reportedly turned away from the Free Patriotic Movement due to a factional dispute, then flirted with the Lebanese Forces, a rival Christian party that opposes Hezbollah and was historically aligned with Israel. Later, Boulos settled on the Marada Movement, another Christian ally of Hezbollah.
The twists and turns of Boulos' political history might actually turn out to be a diplomatic asset. Anonymous sources told Reuters that Boulos "has been in touch with interlocutors across Lebanon's multipolar political world," including the Lebanese Forces and Marada leader Suleiman Frangieh. These kinds of contacts are especially important as the Trump administration tries to maintain a fragile Lebanese-Israeli ceasefire.
And leaders in other Arab countries also see Boulos as a bridge to Washington. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas reached out to the Trump campaign through Boulos in September 2024. Boulos "conveyed Mr. Trump's desire to end wars around the world, including in the Gaza Strip," according to The New York Times. Back then, Boulos told The Times that it was a "purely personal" meeting and he was not speaking for the campaign. With his official adviser role, Boulos now can speak for Trump.
Personnel is policy, as they say, and Trump's staffing picks send a lot of mixed messages. For example, while his chosen National Security Adviser Michael Waltz wants to overthrow the Syrian government, his chosen Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has met with the Syrian leadership and said that they are "not an enemy of the United States." But at the very least, picking Patel and Boulos shows that Trump is not completely married to the national security politics that have dominated Washington since 9/11.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>Personnel is policy, as they say, and Trump's staffing picks send a lot of mixed messages.
you prefer a comment section who agree with everything you say?
Why does racist Trump like Indian dudes so much?
Go back to R Mac....LOL. What's the meaning behind the new screen name?
It’s from The Most Extreme Elimination Challenge.
Is it as extreme as getting on sarcs list?
No clue as Sarc still hasn’t posted the list (as far as I know).
Yes.
MXC is a strange old Japanese gameshow dubbed over with all sorts of English puns and innuendo.
If you've seen Wipeout, it is basically that with Man Show or Mystery Science Theater style commentary and voice over work.
I figure the greater the caterwauling and crying from libs, the better the pick is. There is a LOT of caterwauling, crying, whining and pissing and moaning from the entrenched DC-based libs over Kash Patel appointment.
Patel must be perfect for the job.
Sure, if you think someone who still believes in QAnon is in touch with reality. Unless you want to make the argument that QAnon isn’t complete insanity.
They’re more in touch with reality than you are, Nelson.
The conveyor of donations to act blue = conservatives talks about qanon lol.
No, the conveyor of “people who espouse conservative beliefs are conservatives” is talking about the absolutely batshit crazy QAnon conspiracy theory.
You are the one who seems to think tiny donations to a get-out-the-vote group (not ActBlue) somehow has more relevance than the reported ideology of the shooters. It’s an absolutely insane analysis, but that’s on-brand for you, Jesse. And your paleocon pals like ITL, for that matter.
This article doesn’t exist.
— sarc
That fucker acts as if we criticize everything from Reason and don’t acknowledge the good stuff. I mean the ratio right now is probably 95-5 bad-good, but it doesn’t change the fact that Sarc is an asshole.
It is a 5 year old strawman from him and Mike. For the years they've been told it is a strawman.
"Massad Boulos, who has been tapped to be senior adviser on Middle Eastern and Arab affairs, signals a willingness to engage in serious negotiations over the region."
There seems to be a continuing blind spot amongst reputedly libertarian commentators that favors "negotiations" over "war." Although I certainly prefer negotiations to endless warfare, the United States government should not be engaging in either warfare OR negotiations! If an organized foreign entity is attacking the United States, military action to destroy that entity is appropriate. Once the entity's military capacity has been destroyed, the appropriate next step is to return our forces back home to a national defense posture, not to occupation of foreign regions around the world forever. Negotiating with or, god forbid, "rebuilding" the region, should be strictly forbidden! The United States has NO "vital national interests" that need protecting diplomatically or militarily outside our national borders - zero, zip, nada! Although there is a legitimate role for our fleets to patrol around the world, it should be strictly limited to maintaining the capability to launch an effective counterattack against any entity that attacks the United States of America.
Complete isolationism is as flawed a policy as ideological wars and endlessly occupying foreign countries. We need a global military presence for a variety of reasons, including the ability to respond to military strikes against us. But deployment of large groups of forces and matériel should require Congressional approval.
Understand that this differs significantly from military aid to allies. That should be not be interfered with, especially if that ally is fighting for their existence against an invader. Helping an ally defend themselves against aggression, whether it’s Ukraine or Israel, should always be an interest of the United States.
Then we need to be very careful about who we consider our allies. What has Ukraine done for US interests lately? Are they even really allies in any meaningful sense?
Playing devil's advocate here, it's not so much that Ukraine is our ally as it is that they are a convenient pawn in trying to frustrate Putin's imperial aspirations. Either way it's a bad idea. If Ukraine or Isreal, for example, need weapons, American weapons manufacturers should be free to sell them to other nations (as long as they don't sell actual American military secrets or secret technology) on whatever terms they find profitable.
“ What has Ukraine done for US interests lately?”
Alliances aren’t transactional. They are aligning yourself with countries that share values and priorities. Russia is absolutely an enemy, and an authoritarian invader. Ukraine shares our values and aligns itself with the Western world.
“ Are they even really allies in any meaningful sense?”
Yes. This has been another episode of Simple Answers to Stupid Questions.
Isn't it good that Trump be advised by all sides on an issue? If not, you'd be complaining that he surrounds himself with yes-men.
Well, it WOULD be if Trump were capable of rationally considering different options and going forward with the best of them in an effective manner. Since he is NOT capable of that, it's all just chaos.
Kash's extreme words have disqualified him as a serious person. Yes, the FBI is corrupt and as are many courts, but the solution is not to appoint an extremist hot head. This is serious business and requires a person with integrity who will command the respect of the Center. A bomb thrower is the wrong person. Kash Patel has merely promised to make the FBI into a tool to only go after Trump's political opponents with no regard to the law. His ilk will further polarize the country and bring discredit to the Trump Administration.
Actually no. Some sides are dead wrong. What a President needs is level head people with a good back ground. If the questioning of policies is among credible advisers, that is beneficial, but adding an extremist like Kash Patel, or RFK, Jr is a very, very bad idea.
"He filled his administration with figures who wanted a return to the heady old days after 9/11, when every problem in the world had a U.S. military solution. "
Return? Those foreign policy picks are indeed awful, but they're not a "return" to anything. They're awful because they're more of the same thing we've had nonstop since long before 9/11.