Tribal Sovereignty Saves a Homeless Shelter (For Now)
The Yakama Nation has won a temporary restraining order preventing the City of Toppenish, Washington, from closing its new cold weather shelter.

Happy Tuesday, and welcome to another edition of Rent Free. This week, we cover the battle between tribal government sovereignty and local land use law, the shortcomings of common antieviction policies, and a potential boom in modular housing construction.
Another Warming Center Goes to Court to Ensure It Can Open
Yet another homeless shelter has had to go to court to protect its ability to shelter people from the elements.
Last Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Mary K. Dimke issued a temporary restraining order preventing the city of Toppenish, Washington, from limiting the hours of operations of a cold weather shelter operated by the Yakama Nation tribal government in the town.
"We are thankful that the Court's decision allows us to continue providing heat and shelter for our unhoused Yakama Members, as well as anyone else who needs shelter services in our Yakama Reservation Community," Yakama Nation Tribal Council Chairman Gerald Lewis said in a statement to the Yakima Herald-Republic.
The Yakama Nation's plan to open a 50-bed shelter in a building owned by a local Toppenish nonprofit had been in the works since September.
You are reading Rent Free from Christian Britschgi and Reason. Get more of Christian's urban regulation, development, and zoning coverage.
The initial plan had been to open the shelter on November 20 and operate it 24 hours a day during the cold winter months, giving the homeless a place to sleep, get a meal, and wash their clothes.
In the months leading up to that open date, the Yakama Nation had met multiple times with city officials to outline their plans and address any of the city's concerns. According to court documents, the city didn't formally support or oppose the new shelter.
But a few days prior to the shelter's opening, Toppenish's city manager sent the nation a letter saying that city regulations prevented the warming center from operating for more than six hours a day.
In a response letter, the Yakama Nation told the city that its rights under an 1855 treaty with the federal government prevented the city from regulating its shelter. With temperatures dropping below freezing, the Yakama Nation went ahead with its planned 24-hour operations.
When the city continued to try to restrict the shelter's operations, the Yakama Nation sued in the U.S. District Court of Eastern Washington, demanding preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing Toppenish from regulating its shelter.
Limiting the shelter's operations to just six hours a day "directly threaten the health and safety of enrolled Yakama Members, and therefore threaten the political integrity, health, and welfare of the Yakama Nation," reads the lawsuit.
The city had been given until last Tuesday to respond to the nation's lawsuit. When it didn't, Judge Dimke issued a temporary restraining order that would allow the shelter to open for 24 hours.
In her decision, Dimke cited the below-freezing winter temperatures as evidence of irreparable harm that would result if the shelter weren't allowed to open all day. She demurred on granting more permanent injunctive relief until the city responded to the nation's lawsuit.
Local land use regulations often frustrate homeless shelters' ability to serve people in need.
Recently, Rent Free covered the case of Kalispell, Montana, attempting to shut down the local Flathead Warming Center right as it was about to open for its winter season. Earlier this month, the warming center won a preliminary injunction allowing it to open while its lawsuit against the city plays out.
Study Finds Landlords Mostly Evict Tenants Who Will Never Pay Them
A new working paper on residential evictions finds that the costs of eviction are high to a landlord, that landlords frequently offer temporarily delinquent renters forbearance agreements as a result, and that the most common tenant protection policies likely do little to ultimately prevent evictions.
The paper, authored by researchers at Yale University, New York University, and the University of Chicago and uploaded to the National Bureau of Economic Research website this month, found that an eviction typically costs a landlord two to three months' rent.
As a result "landlords usually allow tenants to default for multiple months before incurring the costs of eviction, and the majority of evictions involve tenants who are persistent non-payers," researchers wrote.
The implication of these findings, researchers argue, is that common tenant protections like short-term rental assistance, extended eviction proceedings, and increased eviction filing fees do little to alter a landlord's decision to pursue an eviction.
If a landlord expects a tenant is unlikely to ever pay rent again, they'll be unmoved by the government providing short-term rental aid and undaunted by the costs of a lengthy eviction process. Eventually, they're going to want their nonpaying tenant out.
On the flip side, if a landlord expects a tenant will return to paying rent, short-term rental aid or a yearlong eviction process is only a secondary deterrent to them pursuing an eviction. They were already willing to work out a deal.
Researchers argue that a primary effect of these tenant protection policies is to keep nonpaying tenants who'll eventually be evicted in a unit for longer.
Is a Modular Housing Boom on the Horizon?
Affordable, mass-produced modular housing that's snapped together onsite is a decades-old dream that always seems just out of reach. One of the nation's largest apartment builders might be making mass modular housing a reality. The Wall Street Journal reports:
Greystar Real Estate Partners on Monday is opening a six-building modular apartment complex, complete with a gym, amphitheater and bocce courts. It is Greystar's first U.S. project assembled using this alternative construction method, aiming to combat the chronic delays of traditional developments.
The new complex called "Ltd. Findlay" is located in Coraopolis, Pa., about 16 miles west of Pittsburgh. It is offering leases for 312 apartments, making it one of the largest multifamily modular projects in the U.S.
Ltd. Findlay is the first property developed at Greystar's modular factory in Knox, Pa. The developer has six more modular projects in its U.S. pipeline that will also be built at the Knox site.
Unlike conventional on-site construction, modular homes are assembled in a factory, transported to the final building site and then stacked on top of each other like jumbo Lego blocks. Proponents say this type of building can be completed faster using fewer workers and with materials that can be purchased at a bulk discount, which can reduce overall costs.
You can read some of Rent Free's past coverage of the ups and downs of the manufactured housing industry here.
Quick Links
- More New Jersey communities have joined a lawsuit challenging a new state law that requires them to zone for an additional 85,000 affordable housing units over the next 10 years.
- Washington, D.C.'s Department of Transportation is finalizing rules that would make permanent the district's temporary, pandemic-era Streatery Program.
- Texas is building gobs of housing, but not enough to prevent its housing shortage from getting worse, according to a recent report.
- New York's pending City of Yes zoning reforms are considered a good "first step" by reform advocates, but it also falls short of what other cities with less steep housing crises have already done.
- Speaking of, New York Sen. Zellnor Myrie (D–Brooklyn) officially announced his plans to run for New York City mayor on an aggressively pro-YIMBY (yes in my backyard) platform today. His Rebuild NYC plan calls for getting New York City to start building at the rates of Tokyo, or at least Jersey City, through a mix of upzoning, building code reforms, and affordable housing mandates.
- Where could the federal government actually build "freedom cities"?
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
what kind of monsters would close a cold-weather shelter in December?
How many homeless people have you taken in?
so, you are the monster?
I'm not sure that's fair and a more nuance discussion. I've in the last 4 years been gifted the pleasure of having a warming shelter pop up in my neighborhood and while the idea of not letting people freeze to death is great, but bringing in folks who leave needles on the ground, punch each other in the face to earn beer monies, yell and accost people walking by, stealing and then being forced through an emergency ordinance to be taxed for continued operation of the shelter in what was a quiet well-kept area can make a person ok with closing this type of hostile takeover situation. Possibly before it opens maybe these councils and cities better map out the cause and effects, rather than the people affected by them be the "monsters".
this example is a 50-bed place run by a non-profit on reservation lands so yes closed by monsters ... but in general while I'm not 8 lines worth of worked up about it I am not a fan of the Dallas Urban Outdoorsmen either
Apparently the community is just fine with the shelter existing. It's someone else intervening to decide how fine it is.
(D)a kind that actually hates poor people.
His Rebuild NYC plan calls for getting New York City to start building…..
Those better be union jobs.
Where could the federal government actually build "freedom cities"?
How much freedom would be in a government built city?
Affordable, mass-produced modular housing that's snapped together onsite is a decades-old dream that always seems just out of reach. One of the nation's largest apartment builders might be making mass modular housing a reality. The Wall Street Journal reports:
That's because affordable, mass-produced modular housing that's "snapped together" is a lot like bitcoin-as-currency, self-driving cars, drone delivery and a dozen other things I can't think of at the moment. It's because snap-together modular housing is often as expensive if not more than traditional housing. A good example is the 'shipping container home' craze that kind of burned itself out a few years ago.
Turns out, that taking a metal box and making it livable is a rather costly and expensive operation, whereas just pouring a concrete slab, standing up some 2x4 framing, shoving some insulation in and nailing up sheetrock is actually pretty cheap.
If you click on the link I embedded, it's an architect explaining why shipping container homes are a scam, and she takes an aside to talk about how architects are overly obsessed with 'modularity'- and even she herself hasn't been immune to the idea.
Interesting link. Everything she mentions is things I already suspected, but it's a good video for those who haven't put much thought into it.
These are unclear.
Is that Texas the state, and New York City the city, which are doing the building, or is it private housing developments?
It's all part of Reason not really giving a shit about libertarianism, individualism, the private sector, etc. There's a huge difference, but it's invisible in almost everything published here.
They want more housing fast for their beloved "immigrants".
Texas is building gobs of housing, but not enough to prevent its housing shortage from getting worse, according to a recent report.
I wonder what might be causing this situation? *scratches chin*
You know who else proposed a massive urban building spree?
"In a response letter, the Yakama Nation told the city that its rights under an 1855 treaty with the federal government prevented the city from regulating its shelter. "
Has any member of that tribe googled the percentage of treaties the US actually kept?
The Document Cloud links to the lawsuit filings return 404 errors.
"Tribal Sovereignty" is a very, very double-edged sword.
Yea, you're spiking the football now - but let me be the first to inform you that Tribal Courts, who have jurisdiction over civil/criminal disputes on Tribal Lands, are notoriously WGAF.
I have seen it in everything from petty larceny to horrific child abuse/neglect. Now, I don't know much about this particular tribe or how it runs its vagrant shelters, so I won't cast aspersions - I'll just point out that if anything untoward or objectionable happens in them, the victims might not have much recourse against it.
an eviction typically costs a landlord two to three months' rent.
That's why the landlord should file an action for unpaid rent and, once they secure a judgment, ask the court to start garnishing the deadbeats until the debt is satisfied.
Affordable, mass-produced modular housing that's snapped together onsite is a decades-old dream that always seems just out of reach.
FFS, it's easy.
http://totalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/What-is-a-Shipping-Container-Yard.jpeg
Now say, "You will live in the pod, and you will love it," comrade.
🖕