This Thanksgiving, Be Thankful for Free Markets
The Pilgrims learned this lesson the hard way. Fast forward 400 years, and many Americans have forgotten.

As we gather this Thanksgiving, it's easy to take abundance for granted.
Leftovers are practically guaranteed.
It wasn't always this way.
For most of history, there were no Thanksgiving feasts. Hunger, if not starvation, was the norm.
Today, supermarkets are stocked with exotic foods from all over the world. Most of it is more affordable than ever. Even after President Joe Biden's 8 percent inflation, Americans spend less than 12 percent of our income on food, half of what they spent 100 years ago.
Why?
Because free markets happened. Capitalism happened.
When there is rule of law and private property, and people feel secure that no thief or government will take their property, farmers find new ways to grow more on less land. Greedy entrepreneurs lower costs and deliver goods faster. Consumers have better options.
Yet today many Americans trash capitalism, demanding government "fixes" to make sure everyone gets equal amounts of this and that.
But it's in countries with the most government intervention where there are empty store shelves and hungrier people.
In socialist Venezuela, affordable food is hard to find.
In Cuba, government was going to make everything plentiful. But people suffered so much that, to prevent starvation, the Castros broke from communist principles and rented out state-owned land to private capitalists.
Millions still go hungry around the world. The cause is rarely drought or "income inequality" or colonialism, but government control. Corruption, tariffs, political self-dealing, and short-sighted regulations block food from reaching those who need it most.
This week, we celebrate the Pilgrims, who learned this lesson the hard way.
When they first landed in America, they tried communal living. The harvest was shared equally. That seemed fair.
But it failed miserably. A few Pilgrims worked hard, but others didn't, claiming "weakness and inability," as William Bradford, the governor of the colony, put it.
They nearly starved.
Desperate, Bradford tried another approach. "Every family," he wrote, "was assigned a parcel of land."
Private property! Capitalism! Suddenly, more pilgrims worked hard.
Of course they did. Now they got to keep what they made.
Bradford wrote, "It made all hands very industrious."
He spelled out the lesson: "The failure of this experiment of communal service, which was tried for several years, and by good and honest men proves the emptiness of the theory…taking away of private property, and the possession of it in community…would make a state happy and flourishing."
Fast forward 400 years, and many Americans have forgotten what Bradford learned.
I see why socialism is popular. The idea of one big, harmonious collective feels good.
But it brings disaster.
Family dinners already have plenty of disagreements—children fight; adults bicker. Imagine what that would be like among millions of strangers.
Collectivist systems encourage dependency, stifle initiative, and waste resources.
The same communal conceit that nearly starved the Pilgrims destroyed lives in the Soviet Union and led to mass starvation in China.
When everyone is forced into the same plan, most people will take as much as they can and produce as little as they can get away with.
Economists call it the "tragedy of the commons" referring to a common plot of land, controlled by, say, sheep owners. Each has an incentive to breed more sheep, which then eat the common's grass until all of it is gone, and everyone goes hungry.
Only when the commons is divided into private property does each owner agree to limit his herd's grazing so there will be enough for his sheep to eat tomorrow.
These same principles apply to many aspects of our lives: We thrive when individuals have a deed to their property and are confident that they can keep what they create. Then they create more.
That's what the Pilgrims learned: Incentives matter. Capitalist ownership is what creates American abundance.
Every Thanksgiving, I'm thankful for free markets and private property.
They are the ingredients of prosperity.
COPYRIGHT 2024 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Today’s meal will include a bounty from the land. For this, I am Thankful.
Hopefully you consumed a free range turducken. Btw, they just showed a six-legged bird on the sidelines of the Cowboy game and the announcer complained that they only got a “regular, four-legged bird” up in the press box.
There is free range turkey on the property. Sometimes ducks but no chickens as of late.
Already ate all the free range cats?!?
I’d like to see video of an illegal alien Haitian trying to catch a bobcat or lynx.
Got some tasty mountain lions in my neighborhood. (For real)
Free markets, you say? We should try that sometime.
Remember. Free markets to sophist libertarians means advantaged markets.
Free markets to right-wing wrong-nuts means always MORE tariff-taxes!!!
I could even see one of these sophist libertarians of which you speak seeking a subsidy to put bears in trunks.
If people won’t voluntarily keep bears in their trunks, the government will have to force it.
Possibly even transitioning bear cubs.
I'm thankful for:
JD Vance always being wrong.
Tariffs being the only economic variable.
Deep state bureaucrats being praised and protected against firings.
Open borders into a welfare state.
Criticism of any non long term D.C. worker being selected to a cabinet.
GMO turducken.
Mike coming back.
Sarc alternate dictionary of definitions.
That democrats did it first.
I'm thankful for the alphabet agencies and all they did in 2020 to try to keep the world safe for corporatism, war and censorship.
The LP nominating an unserious, narrative following, knee-bending, virtue signaling, closet progressive to represent the Libertarian movement.
Closet progressive? I thought Chase was out.
I’m thankful for shrill democrats making public assholes of themselves today. Constantly reminding American citizens what they’re really all about.
Cutting yourself off from family and refusing to eat with them because they don't subscribe to your beliefs totally doesn't say "cult".
Here’s another gem…..
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2024/11/28/watch-pro-palestinian-protesters-disrupt-macys-thanksgiving-parade/
So, when they're glued to the pavement, do they leave them there? I mean, that's what they should do. Leave them there until they have the huevos to set themselves free. Meanwhile don't let anyone near them to help, and arrest them as soon as they've freed themselves.
Stupidity should hurt.
Officer Byrd, sarcs favorite officer, is thankful for everyone including government paying him for blindly shooting babbit.
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
NEW: Records show fatally shooting Trump rioter Ashli Babbitt has been lucrative for USCP Capt. Byrd who several mos later was offered $36k retention bonus, per a USCP memo, ten times the $3k offered other officers. Byrd, who had severe debt, also raked in $164k from CrowdFunding
He is especially thankful to Reason for ignoring his actions.
Precisely so.
As I've noted before, in the USSR, a small amount of agricultural land - about 5% - was in private hands. It produced 50% of USSR's agricultural products.
I wondered about the size of the original Plymouth Colony. I've read research suggesting that up to about 120 people, a commune system can work but above that, people don't know each other well enough, it's harder to use family/friend influence on "defectors", it becomes difficult to allocate resources centrally, etc.
And lo! very rapidly the colony exceeded 120: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_Colony
Not surprising therefore that their collectivism failed.
"Not surprising therefore that their collectivism failed."
Thanksgiving commemorates the giving of food to the starving colonists by the Indians. How do we account for the success of the collectivism of the Indians? There were millions more than the 120 mentioned in the research you've come across. And they had more than enough food to feed themselves and the pilgrims as well.
They (Native Americans) lived in SMALL tribes and clans, were everyone knew everyone! SRG2's comments are correct! See "Dunbar's Number" at about 150... Try to co-ordinate a MUCH LARGER-than-that number of humans, without power devolved down to small groups (think families and disciplined-by-the-markets corporations), and ye are BEGGING for arrogant power-hungry autocrats and parasites, including lazy parasites, to run the show!
"Dunbar's Number" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number
Not sure where I got my 120 from! But it was deffo 120. Dunbar's number seems to have somewhat more evidence.
120, 150, not much difference there... Psychology and anthropology aren't exactly mathematically precise fields of endeavor...
Happy Thanksgiving!!!!
"They (Native Americans) lived in SMALL tribes and clans"
They were organized into federations of nations which were vastly larger than the bands or clans you refer to. Benjamin Franklin was so impressed by their organization that they served as an inspiration for the formation of the US. The American Revolution was all about rejecting the autocrats and parasites of England and adopting a more decentralized form of social organization, inspired at least in part by the Iroquois confederacy. I don't see how Dunbar's number or the forced communization of the Bolsheviks has any relevance to the origins or thanksgiving, except maybe to memory hole the role of the collectivist yet successful natives.
See https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1250858801/reasonmagazinea-20/ The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity ... A long book, but I read it pretty much cover to cover. Human history is WAAAAY complex, but... When power pigs got too powerful, people have repeatedly rebelled, and moved back to "more power to the locals"!!! All across the planet, and space and time! But yes, you are correct about the Iroquois confederacy and Ben Franklin! The secret magic ***IS*** to combine local autonomy AND central organization!
Notice that the brains of humans (and many-many other animals) reserve SOME central decisions for the brain... When to fight, and when to flee, comes to mind... But the brain does NOT tell each and every body cell how many molecules of sugar to shove into the Krebb's cycle! TOO MUCH central power is WAAAAY too much!!!!
It's a good book and I've read it too. The authors are critical of using Dunbar's number to put forward arguments like SRG2 is doing.
Available for free here:
http://library.lol/main/F567E6E14F95A114FB313F03536A053C
" The secret magic ***IS*** to combine local autonomy AND central organization!"
Or alternate between the two according to season, purpose, or other conditions. (As the good book says.)
"When power pigs got too powerful, people have repeatedly rebelled,"
I'd argue instead that when the pigs no longer are able to satisfy the needs of the populace, their days are numbered. There's nothing in the world as powerful as an empty stomach when it comes to motivating rebellion.
The rulers have lost the "Mandate of Heaven", as the ancient Chinese used to say...
More straight to your claims or questions, Dunbar's number is VERY relevant to Big-Government welfare and socialism!!! When I know 150 of my neighbors, I know who does, and who does NOT, deserve my charitable contributions!!! Guy or gal's house burns down, through no fault of their own, I will donate!!! Asshole REFUSES to work, drinks beer all day, plays LOUD music at all hours? NONE of my money for him!!! (OK then MAYBE charity should be decided locally, by local givers? Just maybe?)
Under All-is-for-the-Hive Government Almighty, there IS no such thing ass an "undeserving poor person"!!! Because centralized Government Almighty can NOT keep track of more than 150 people, per Dunbar's Number!!! Kinda simple, actually...
Centralized authorities don't need to keep track of people. They simply give each person a number, whether it's a SS number, a bank account or IP address. Government and marketeers often use zip codes to judge an individual's value to society or worthiness as customer.
And it doesn't work! Government Almighty has spent $BILLIONS$ on poverty "fixes", for many decades, but for lack of "discrimination" (yes, I know, BAD word!) between the deserving and the undeserving poor, we STILL have oodles and boodles of poverty! Why should a poor young woman NOT have a child out of wedlock, if Government Almighty will pay for her children, and get her OUT of underneath her oppressive Mom? Or from underneath her Mom-Dad if she is REALLY-really lucky? ... Government Almighty charity, unlike private charity, destroys families!
"And it doesn't work! "
But it does work. The expanding, continued and uninterrupted existence of government is testament. Decades of dole have kept the poor fed and satisfied and free of pesky thoughts of getting together and doing something about it. Before welfare we had Hoovervilles, large accumulations of desperate people who were such a threat to the status quo that the army had to be called to destroy the settlements, and brutalize and disperse the needy citizens.
It doesn't work in Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Russia, or other places. It only BARELY works here, a LITTLE bit, and blow-back from illegal-sub-humans-hating conservatives who CONSTANTLY harp on the SUPPOSED vast welfare checks going to said illegal sub-humans... And pending trade wars... Are ALL large built upon hatred of the "welfare mooches", which would NOT be here if Government Almighty would just STOP making our charity choices for us!
The peoples of Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Russia, and other places can NOT manage to overthrow their obviously deficient, too-large Governments Almighty, which CLAIM to be SOOO concerned about their poor, suffering citizens. Going further in that (their) direction will be a large mistake!
And a root cause IS "Dunbar's Number", whereby centralized bureaucrats have their 150 numbers taken up in their heads by their bosses (politicians) and co-workers, and NOT by the recipients of public charity! HOW can I track which welfare mooch is deserving, and which is not, when central-government politics eats up all of my brain-space?
Also USA poor people are PREVENTED from working, by Government Almighty licensing laws! Let alone illegal sub-humans NOT being
allowed to work!
"Also USA poor people are PREVENTED from working,"
They are prevented from working legally, yet they work nevertheless in what is called the grey or informal economy, outside government purview and taxation for the most part.
Statistics on the informal economy are unreliable by virtue of the subject, yet they can provide a tentative picture of its relevance. For example, informal employment makes up 58.7% of non-agricultural employment in Middle East – North Africa, 64.6% in Latin America, 79.4% in Asia, and 80.4% in sub-Saharan Africa.[29] If agricultural employment is included, the percentages rise, in some countries like India and many sub-Saharan African countries beyond 90%. Estimates for developed countries are around 15%.[4] In recent surveys, the informal economy in many regions has declined over the past 20 years to 2014. In Africa, the share of the informal economy has decreased to an estimate of around 40% of the economy.[30]
Even in the most oppressive regimes there are black markets. In Democratic Kampuchea under Pol Pot there was brisk trade in rice, tins of condensed milk, and fountain pens. (Any self respecting cadre had to have a fountain pen in his shirt pocket - for display as much as for writing.)
Thanks, that was interesting!!!
OK, that's something I didn't expect to see today, an exchange between an antisemitic retard, a sock, and a shit-eating squirrel.
Their system was not collectivism. The Pilgrims themselves were basically indentured servants. The land itself was owned by the investors of the Plymouth Colony of Virginia (bad guy Roberto Gorges and his son Ferdinando) - exclusively in roughly New England, in competition with the Dutch and the London Company of Virginia from NY to NC. That was renamed the Council of New England just before the Pilgrims landed but that had nothing to do with Pilgrims. The Pilgrims were told they would receive 100 acres each at the end of seven years if they survived but until then they are an indentured servant. A tenant on the land lord's land.
Their trip and provisions and annual supply ship (and presumably some land payment kickback to the Plymouth Colony) were financed by the Merchant Adventurers (bad guy Thomas Weston) - who required that the Pilgrims pay interest and a % of profits. Since food production doesn't generate profits, they were the ones who objected to those colonists growing food (often women and children) while others were failing to find gold. Again - not collectivism.
Early on - the Plymouth Colony was obviously a disaster since they were a bunch of city dwellers who knew nothing about either farming or North America. Which is why they died in large numbers. But the two absentee big shots thought that failure was because the Pilgrims were religious and had families and hence were lazy. So in 1622, they sent a new colony up north a bit (called Wessagusset) composed entirely of men who would find furs, gold, or at least chop down a lot of trees for resale. That colony didn't grow their own food. They stole it from the nearby Indians and started a war. Which pulled the Pilgrims in as well. They quickly decided that Wessagusett was a dead colony - and would be merged with Plymouth since the Pilgrims had no interest in fighting a second war at Wessagusett.
THAT is the specific impetus for allocating one acre to each person - in violation of the terms of their contract - done in 1623. But they also realized that there would be no more supply ships coming from the Merchant Adventurers so they were now on their own and just hoping to survive until the indenture ended. Again - no collectivism. Just a story of crappy absentee landlords and their greed and stupidity.
In 1623, the supply ships did stop and the London based companies pretty much ceased to operate. In 1627, the indenture was completed and the survivors got their 100 acres. Colonization from that point was via the Massachusetts Company and the Plymouth Company lost its land charter in 1635
This hoary horseshit story about Pilgrim collectivism and 'free markets' was invented in 1968 by Henry Hazlitt and was first told in The Freeman And repeated ad nauseum since then
The first Thanksgiving was truly in the fall of 1621 and its story in Of Plimouth Plantation is similar to the traditional tale with Pilgrims and Indians sharing a harvest. Though it didn't have a name until much later
And the reason the Pilgrims story becomes part of American mythology is because the manuscript that described the Plymouth experience (and the first Thanksgiving) was rediscovered (coincidentally) in the late 1840's. Which was EXACTLY the time when the South (Jamestown/Virginia) and the North (Plymouth/New England) needed competing origin stories.
I'm more thankful for colonization being as successful as it was.
Also, be grateful you don't live in some socialist paradise like Cuba, North Korea or Venezuela...at least not yet.
Big Man Trump will get us to a Socialist Utopia of LARGER always LARGER Government Almighty, in the Sacred Name of Tariff-Taxes and Big, Bold, Beautiful WALLS!
Free trade isn’t free unless it’s perfectly equal and fair. That means systems of law must be the same and neither party has any comparative advantage. If that impossible scenario is not met then your government must bless you with protective tariffs that must raise prices and cause inflation if they are to be effective. By effective I mean create jobs. That’s because the true purpose of trade is jobs, not consumption. That’s why Reason and stupid libertarians are always wrong about trade. They think it’s about consumption and low prices. It’s not. It’s about jobs, high wages, and sticking it to foreigners.
Sarc's thankful for the ability to troll and the proliferation of hard iced teas.
I hope nobody has to suffer through a thanksgiving dinner with him at the table.
Unless there's turkey infused vodka and cranberry flavored gin he's probably not interested.
Wild Turkey.
His family all left him. Couldn't afford a half million dollar air bnb this year.
Today Sarc is most grateful to the dive bar that opened at 6 am.
One thing I’m thankful for is a robust constitution that protects us from presidents like Obama, Trump, Biden, Trump etc by making it difficult for them to accomplish their goals. Congress keeps concentrating power into the executive branch, diluting those protections, but it hasn’t yet succeeded in turning the president into a king. I’m thankful for that, and for your and the other Trump defenders’ inevitable disappointment.
See that you didn’t have just mashed potatoes or just stuffing and instead had a healthy serving of boaf sidez.
Sarc has likely go ble duo a lot of wild turkey already.
"but it hasn’t yet succeeded in turning the president into a king."
Good thing the Biden junta didn't use executive orders, the FBI as their own Stasi, ditch the primaries or try to imprison the other claimants to the throne.
You have to trust in the sacred Democrat run institutions. Just ask sarc.
"Free trade isn't free unless it's perfectly equal and fair"
It's not clear to me what that comment has to do with what John Stossel wrote. But ...
In a perfect world we might have perfectly free trade. In the meantime, freerer trade is better than not-so-free trade and much better than unfree trade.
In our imperfect world where perfectly free trade is thwarted by governments everywhere, we have to make the best of what is possible ... while separately working to try to make more things possible.
" ... the true purpose of trade is jobs, not consumption."
There's no dichotomy between jobs and consumption - it's not an either/or propsition. [Free] trade is more about increasing wealth and the benefits increased wealth brings to society. Wealth, in turn, makes it possible to address other benefits to society.
As with any human endeavor, the results of trade may not necessarily be all on the benefit side of the ledger, but I believe that the net effect of trade - even not-so-free trade - is positive.
"Reason and stupid libertarians are always wrong about trade. They think it’s about consumption and low prices. It’s not. It’s about jobs, high wages, and sticking it to foreigners."
I'm not sure what gives you that idea, much less the idea that you can speak for people you've never met and know nothing about, but I can tell you your statement is wrong.
I conside myself much more Libertarian than anything else. Your words do not come close to describing my thoughts/beliefs ... nor those of any genuine Libertarian I've ever met or read.
What's astonishing to me is that you (and some others here) claim to have identified the beliefs of people about whom you clearly know nothing - about whom you have no way of knowing their beliefs.
I suppose it's easier to assign bogus beliefs to others, so you (and others here) can then attack those falsely assigned beliefs - with often adhominem attacks - instead of addressing the information you actually have.
I don't think any humans are right all the time, and many are often wrong. But if you want to find fault with a specific statement, or a group of statements (such as a blog post), your comments would be more defensible and applicable, if you stuck to addressing the statements made by the author you want to criticize.
JEP41, shit's Thanksgiving, so I will TRY to be generous, and speculate that MAYBE you've not been exposed to just HOW much of a trash-heap of garbage that has been piled up here in Reason comments by vile and vapid, empty-headed spouters of grade-school insults! Hang out some, and ye will see!
Meanwhile...
Hordes of small-minded “conservatives” here on these comment pages are intellectually, morally, and spiritually bankrupt! For lack of ANY factual or logical and benevolent-minded response, they variously resort to endlessly repeated lies, grade-school-level vapid insults, and even stoop so low as to encourage the smarter and more benevolent posters to commit suicide! They are indeed vapid and vile vipers!
I for one can’t STAND the idea that a casual reader here of a libertarian news and commenting site would read the vapid and vile comments, and conclude, “Oh, so THAT’s what libertarians are all about!” No, it’s just that REAL libertarians (and VERY few others) still believe in free speech, so the troglodytes come HERE, where their vile lies & vapid insults will NOT be taken down!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Instead of KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., we’d be better off VOTING for these kinds of people! But we will NOT, ’cause they Hurt Our Precious Baby Feelings, by giving tribalism and do-gooder derogation the disrespect that they (we self-righteous tribalists) SOOO thoroughly deserve!
Google Poe’s Law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
Thus, I cuntclude that Dear Leader TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer should be appointed and anointed ass EMPEROR-GOD TO BEYOND INFINITY AND INFINSHITTY!!!!
The drunkard think's he's being funny by saying a bunch of shit that nobody has said, because imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
What he doesn't know encompasses way more than what he does.
I for one think that Sarc's funny as all git-out, because he apes SOOOO well, twat sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds really-actually seem to think (OK, well, with a WEE tad of exaggeration), but they're not honest enough to say outright!
Scott Adams (think "Dilbert") used to use that sort of humor a lot, before he got cancelled... What would they say if they were honest about themselves and their so-called "thinking"?
Hey JEP41, Schlepping Towards TotalShitarian Gomorrah...
"...beliefs of people about whom you clearly know nothing..."
Day after day after day after day, "Libertarians" (who are actually, feebly trying to wear sheep's clothing, while inwardly, not very secretly at all, they are ravening sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds, power pigs, authorShitarians, and totalShitarians) spew ALL SORTS of vile shit here every day!!! Do you NOT think that your mere-mortal fellow humanoids can READ the vile posts of these power pigs, and finger out, exactly TWAT they are all about? Do YOU in Your Magnificunt SuperiorShitty somehow KNOW that the power pigs do SNOT mean twat they write? Where did Ye buy Your PervFected Mind-Reading Tinfoil Hate-Hat, and what is the going price? Is regular calibration part of the deal?
I take it you're working off the stuffed shit you had for dinner.
Anyone who doesn’t like capitalism should be required to do without it.
"Capitalism" is a bad word, implying that it's an "ism" like any other. It is not! I prefer "free market" or "letting individuals make their own choices". Too long? How about "freedom in buying and selling"? Still too long? "Economic freedom?" "Government Almighty FUCK RIGHT OFF; Ye do SNOT know better than I do, what I want to buy and sell!!!!"
Capitalism is what naturally arises in a system of property rights and contract enforcement.
"...property rights and contract enforcement..."
Ha! A totes rotten and twatten deal!!! If we had REALLY equal rights, we'd ALL have "equal access" to Spermy Daniels, and cuntract enforcement!!! And Dear Leader TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer adamantly REFUSES to share and share alike!!!!
#ShareSpermyDanielsAlreadyBeforeTitsTooLate
Since it's an annual Thanksgiving tradition at Reason to run this historically illiterate Stossel column, it's become my annual tradition to post this response to it: https://c4ss.org/content/22792
"A Left Anarchist Think Tank and Media Center"
lol
Also, why is it "historically illiterate"?
"For most of history, there were no Thanksgiving feasts. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_harvest_festivals
Okay, you're right there. Harvest festivals are at least 10,000 years old as documented at Catalhoyuk and Karahan Tepe.
He means white people history.
Stuff like this is why there was a landslide victory.
"Happy Thanksgiving to all, including to the Radical Left Lunatics who have worked so hard to destroy our Country, but who have miserably failed, and will always fail, because their ideas and policies are so hopelessly bad that the great people of our Nation just gave a landslide victory to those who want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Don’t worry, our Country will soon be respected, productive, fair, and strong, and you will be, more than ever before, proud to be an American!"
We wish you a Jewish Christmas
We wish you a Jewish Christmas
We wish you a Jewish Christmas
And Hanukkah too.
You shoor do hate them Jooz.
One-third of Jewish-American teens say they 'sympathise' with Hamas, Israeli government poll shows. We radical left lunatics are in good company.
Teenagers always show good judgment.
Teenager's judgement is probably on a par with that of adults. The sympathy for Hamas is more likely down to their compassion, rebelliousness and willingness to take risks. That's what separates them from adults, who, like Mother's Lament (Salt farmer), are all to willing to fall in line with whatever hateful propaganda the authority figures are promoting.
One third of Jew hating Americans make up their own statistics.
Tomorrow marks 10 months since Reason announced that you have to pay them to state your opinion. Everyone here has "temporary" privileges.
So will they ever cash this threat?
Given how the election went, it should have happened 3 weeks ago.
My guess: Koch will just kill the site.
I don’t think us free accounts cost Reason any money or other resources; we correct the errors in the articles. It isn’t like we cost them $150B/year and are murdering, raping, and trafficking thousands. We know Reason would oppose that.
If they banned all the free accounts from posting the comments section would be a ghost town. Then there'd be evidence if just how few think this place is worth a paltry $20. anymore.
Don’t poke the bear in the trunk.
Sshhhhhh!
Sure thankful for Stossell!!!
Did you pay your 80% Nazi-Tax on that Corn! /s