Bullish on DOGE
Plus: ICC goes after Netanyahu, Biden's questionable competence, Gaetz's sexcapades, and more...

DOGE details: After a week of speculation, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy wrote in The Wall Street Journal of their plans for what the Department of Government Efficiency will actually look like.
"Most legal edicts aren't laws enacted by Congress but 'rules and regulations' promulgated by unelected bureaucrats—tens of thousands of them each year. Most government enforcement decisions and discretionary expenditures aren't made by the democratically elected president or even his political appointees but by millions of unelected, unappointed civil servants within government agencies who view themselves as immune from firing thanks to civil-service protections," they write. "This is antidemocratic and antithetical to the Founders' vision."
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Get your daily news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.
Basically, it won't be a separate agency, but rather a collection of people who get put at each agency to identify what needs to be cut. "DOGE will work with legal experts embedded in government agencies, aided by advanced technology, to apply these rulings to federal regulations enacted by such agencies," Ramaswamy and Musk write. "DOGE will present this list of regulations to President Trump, who can, by executive action, immediately pause the enforcement of those regulations and initiate the process for review and rescission." They'll identify the "minimum number of employees required" for each given agency to perform its "constitutionally permissible and statutorily mandated" function. A massive reduction in headcount looks likely.
This Milei-core buddy duo slashing the size of government amounts to a libertarian fantasy come true.
"When the president nullifies thousands of such regulations, critics will allege executive overreach," the two predict, having been around the block enough to know what the haters will say. "In fact, it will be correcting the executive overreach of thousands of regulations promulgated by administrative fiat that were never authorized by Congress."
Godspeed, fair kings.
Gaetzkeeping: Will we ever lay eyes on the House Ethics Committee's report into the many purported misdeeds (sexual and otherwise) of former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz?
Here's what happened. Gaetz attended a string of parties in 2017 in Orlando where there were drugs and escorts. He purportedly had sex with a 17-year-old—below Florida's age of consent, though all parties claim her age was not discussed—which at least one witness saw. He also allegedly paid for sex, though he frequently used other people to cover for him, as one does when, as a sitting member of Congress with an IQ above 70, one is buying sex from teenage prostitutes.
Naturally, President-elect Donald Trump saw the above laid out—as well as Gaetz's loyal harassing of people like former Rep. Liz Cheney (R–Wyo.)—and thought well, that man looks like a natural-born attorney general. So Gaetz will now be confirmed or rejected for that post, to lead the Department of Justice, and has accordingly resigned from the House in order to do so. Oh, and one very convenient side effect of resigning from the House: the Ethics Committee's report, which had been—for various procedural reasons—repeatedly stymied, will apparently no longer be released, per House Speaker Mike Johnson, as there is no reason to have an investigation on someone who is no longer a sitting representative.
Now, "Senators from both parties who would vet Mr. Gaetz for the position have asked to see the report," reports The New York Times. "Vice President-elect JD Vance and Mr. Gaetz were on Capitol Hill on Wednesday to meet with senators in hopes of smoothing his path to confirmation." Meanwhile, since information wants to be free, "an unidentified hacker has gained access to a computer file shared in a secure link among lawyers whose clients have given damaging testimony related to Matt Gaetz."
Wholly sidestepping whether or not Gaetz is a libertarian hero for flouting age-of-consent laws, information about his possible lawbreaking seems relevant to the senators who will be asked to vote to confirm him.
Rand Paul against mass deportations: "I'm not for really most presidential emergencies because they smack of martial rule…I'm not for the Army marching up and down our streets [to deport people]," said Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) to Newsmax of President-elect Donald Trump's immigration plan. "The American people will be behind him 100% if he goes immediately after the people that have committed crimes…let's go there and start there. There is to my mind some question of the housekeeper who's been here 30 years, and I don't see the military putting her in handcuffs and marching her down the street to an encampment.…There might be an in-between solution where, if they're already working productively, that we allow them to have a work permit. So I would expand, actually, a lot of work permits for people…I think us as conservatives who are supportive of Trump need to caution him about sending the Army into our cities."
I wonder if more legislators on the right will come out of the woodwork and start cautioning Trump to be careful about his deportation approach. Libertarian-leaning Republicans who aren't totally captured by MAGA (like Paul) are an endangered species but surely some number of conservatives agree that industrious people not consuming welfare who have shown themselves to be no threat at all to the safety of their communities deserve leniency and an easier pathway to citizenship.
Scenes from New York: A long read on the New York City Trump voter phenomenon.
QUICK HITS
- "The US Transportation Security Administration, the federal government entity that oversees Clear, has enacted stricter rules on it after a series of high-profile security lapses," reports Bloomberg. "As a result, the experience has gotten worse for many customers, some of whom have taken to social media to gripe about how Clear often ends up being slower than TSA PreCheck, the agency's cheaper and less flashy service. Now the TSA is rolling out its own facial-recognition technology, which could make Clear redundant." (Great, TSA in charge of biometric data.)
- "The International Criminal Court on Thursday issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and the former Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes in the Gaza Strip," reports The New York Times. "Karim Khan, the court's chief prosecutor, had requested the arrest warrants in May for the two Israelis, alongside three top Hamas officials. Israel has fiercely contested the court's allegations, which include the use of starvation as a weapon of war and 'intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population.'" Many Israelis—even those who oppose Netanyahu or believe he has erred—are highly critical of the ICC's actions on this front.
- Matt Yglesias, on Slow Boring, writes about how "urbanists, including YIMBYs, spend too much time entranced by nostalgia and Europhilia and not really confronting the reality that the increasingly affluent American population wants to live in big homes." He offers up a concept (amusingly similar to Le Corbusier's failed "towers in the park") of how this could look, specifically talking about what building high-rises for families might look like.
- Interesting:
From a piece I wrote on @PirateWires last month, super cool to see this actually starting to play out https://t.co/xQzloRgwF9 pic.twitter.com/7WtMfKwkD5
— Bridget (@bridge__harris) November 19, 2024
- A good point that we've oddly stopped talking about:
Is there any particular reason to assume Biden is competent to be president right now? It's a very difficult job. It's a dangerous world. Extremely high-stakes decisions in Ukraine. He should resign and let Harris serve out the last 2 months.https://t.co/02huFqQT3W pic.twitter.com/ZLWqcbkAYW
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 20, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...what the Department of Government Efficiency will actually look like.
They must use the stones to destroy the stones.
Is it too early to be getting my hopes up? I have been let down before.
It will almost certainly be disappointing. But how often is a disappointing effort at reduction worse than an effort at a massive increase?
Until you see the asteroid in the sky, it's too early to get your hope up.
never! as long as we hit the wire with the connecting hook at precisely 88mph the instant the lightning strikes the tower, everything will be fine.
So youre saying the only way to experience 1985 levels of fed govt regulation is time travel?
oooh maybe ... I do suffer from timeless optimism.
Like waiting in line at the DMV, but in reverse.
"...a libertarian fantasy come true."
Not to those who see government as the answer to every problem, most of which have been created by that same government.
The other side of the Gaetz claims JS and media is ignoring.
Meet the origination of the claims. Stephen Alford. Who tried to extort the Gaetz family for 25M over the claims.
https://www.newsweek.com/stephen-alford-sentenced-25m-gaetz-family-extortion-attempt-1736022
If they really want to release some reports, how about the ones from DoJ on why there were no charges filed?
I’m with MTG. If you want to release one. Release them all.
There is an advocacy here to violate institutional norms.
On top of that all the witnesses are colliding. Greenberg is paying the witnesses Liz mentions in the writeup, in jail over making similar claims against others.
Reason has a bad record of this advocacy. Calling Ford and Carrol credible. They simply want the continued abuse narrative more than they want evidence of an actual crime.
Mike will also be here shortly that not charging Gaetz after a 3 year investigation doesn't prove a crime wasn't committed. But he doesn't require evidence or proof of one, he knows it happened. Ask him.
Yes, I agree….EVERYONE gets to dance in the sunlight, if the Ethics Committee wants to play games with the ‘draft report’ they have had for 3 years.
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Let it ALL come out: The NDAs, the financial allegations, the sex allegations, dealings with Epstein and P Diddy, etc.
No problem.
Gaetz withdraws……
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/21/trump-ag-pick-matt-gaetz-says-hes-withdrawing.html
So is he going to be Senator Gaetz now?
Slime ball tactics of the media and left continue to work.
Will this go into the lexicon like Bork did?
Kash for AG!
Fuck, I’ll do it. If I do, it will be necessary to reopen GitMo to house the more dangerous democrats. Also, it will get real fucking bad for certain pedophiles. Especially the ones who brazenly post child porn links in comment sections of websites
Basically, it won't be a separate agency, but rather a collection of people who get put at each agency to identify what needs to be cut.
Deploy the zampolits!
Commissars for the Soviet!
A look back at the actions Obama and Hillary took to embolden and strengthen Russia.
https://justthenews.com/government/security/hldthe-obama-biden-clinton-nuclear-giveaway-russia-decade-ago-about-bite
Speaking of "unqualified"...
https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2024/11/19/the-least-qualified-nominee-for-office-ever-n4934439
Let's review [Obama's] oh-so-impressive CV at the time he first applied for the job of Leader of the Free World:
Two years doing corporate research and at the New York Public Interest Research Group
Several years as a community organizer with a church-based group, the Developing Communities Project
"Summer associate" (whatever that is) at the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin
Twelve years as "senior lecturer" at the University of Chicago Law School (a part-time position)
Eight years as Illinois State Senator (classified as a “full-time lite” position by the National Conference of State Legislatures)
Four years as the junior U.S. senator from Illinois, two of which were spent running for president
Has Ivy League degrees
Wrote a book about himself
Gave a really good speech once
Identifies as black.
That's it. That's all it took to convince my lefty coworkers that Obama was qualified to leverage the mighty leviathan of the U.S. federal apparatus. His executive resume was so thin that at one point, Obama declared that running his own campaign had provided him with executive experience. Talk about on-the-job learning.
Now the lefties and their establishment Republican allies are wailing and gnashing their teeth that Trump AG nominee Matt Gaetz is "unqualified." It's true that the man is relatively young, at 42 years of age. He earned his Juris Doctor from the William & Mary Law School in 2007 and was admitted to the Florida Bar in 2008. He spent several years as an attorney with a Florida law firm before he was elected to serve in the Florida House in 2010. After seven years of service there, he put in seven more years in the U.S. House. Speaker Mike Johnson says he's known as "one of the most intelligent members of Congress.”
Obama was extremely unqualified to be President. And he wasn't above using skullduggery to get into office.
For his first run as Illinois State Senator, he challenged the signatures of every other candidate in the Democratic primary, including the incumbent. He won those cases and became the only Democratic candidate in the primary in a very Democratic district, thus guaranteeing him the seat.
https://www.westernjournal.com/flashback-1996-obama-challenged-signatures-get-primary-opponents-thrown-off-ballot/
Then, when running for the US Senate, the Obama campaign moved to have the divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, unsealed so as to embarrass Ryan and knock him off the ballot. Obama was successful and sent the Illinois GOP into a tailspin from which it still hasn't recovered. And it wasn't Obama's first time doing this shit either.
https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/08/01/obamas_signature_move_unsealing_private_records-n972537
Obama, IMHO, is about as nasty as they come for politicians.
Imagine if it turned out that he was involved in this whole Russiagate thing.
Jack Ryan was tall, handsome, Catholic
Except for the catholic part, sounds like sarcs kind of enemy. Wait. Probably hates the catholic part too.
You forgot all the years Obama was trained and groomed by whatever star chamber has been running the country, and the world, since the turn of the century (at least).
Scott pressler goes to Bucks County, home of the county that tried to count illegal votes, and told them to their face he will spend the next 3 years there to replace them in the next election.
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1859276862272483645
What a fascist.
Wait until Republicans find out he’s gay!
So you're saying Scott Presler will be the Libertarian nominee for President in 2028?
If the fake Libertarians don’t Chase him away.
I'd vote for him. He seems to actually understand that politics is a street fight, and anything goes.
So much easier to kneecap Marxist scum like that.
Stop paying attention to Nate silver.
And Matty Yglesias as well for that matter. The man's a total retard.
Why? Do you really believe Biden is competent and has been President in action for the past 10 months? He is President in appearance and reading teleprompters. Unless he is jacked on stimulants, he comes across as "an old man with a poor memory."
It could also be a diabolical plot…..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM1-0_cve1o&t=45s
Leading Report
@LeadingReport
BREAKING: Biden State Department tells Ukraine they can keep $4.65B in taxpayer money they originally were supposed to pay back, per Rep. Matt Rosendale.
It’s spare change, really.
Just the bar tab.
Yeah, I kinda support helping Ukraine not get swarmed by Putin's Russia. But shoveling cash into Zelensky and his cronies' pockets is not the way.
Big Z has a nice new Egyptian house thanks to us.
The corruption of UKR is absolutely disgusting. RUS can have them.
How have you supported them?
Do you think Biden also stands by the windows in the Oval Office everyday and flips off the world?
The blowback from this proxy military adventure could be substantial. The “all-in” hohols are delusional. Expect domestic terror here within the decade.
A massive reduction in headcount looks likely.
Decentralizing the departments throughout the nation might do that for them. WHO WANTS TO MOVE TO BUTTE JUST TO WORK IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR???
Me! Two hour drive to Big Sky, sign me up.
Yes. Getting loads of government workers out of D.C. can only be a good thing. Put the USDA HQ in Omaha, put HHS is Detroit... there's almost no reason why most agencies need thousands of employees to be present full-time in D.C.
Exactly. Put the agencies where most of the people they serve are. BIA and BIE should be in Farmington, New Mexico (as an example).
Cocktail parties?
Disagree. It may alter the mindset of the bureaucrats (less DC coastal elite) for a time but it would entrench them further into America. It's why the Pentagon has different parts of programs spread across the country; makes it harder to kill when 100 Congreeman need those jobs in their districts vs 1 or 2. And there is no guarantee that the DC coastal elite minset won't infect the locals.
Give the devil a ride and he's gonna wanna drive.
Correct, and make sure many of those offices are in red strongholds. This will rapidly reduce the number of democrats employed by the federal government. Further reducing democrat power, and therefore democrat treason.
Gaetz attended a string of parties in 2017 in Orlando where there were drugs and escorts.
I wanted Hunter for attorney general but I guess we'll settle for this.
I wanted Hunter for cruise director.
Like Trump said, Hunter would be great to party with.
Shuffleboard at 10 AM, pegging at 11.
Or I guess not.
"Most legal edicts aren't laws enacted by Congress but 'rules and regulations' promulgated by unelected bureaucrats—tens of thousands of them each year. Most government enforcement decisions and discretionary expenditures aren't made by the democratically elected president or even his political appointees but by millions of unelected, unappointed civil servants within government agencies who view themselves as immune from firing thanks to civil-service protections," they write. "This is antidemocratic and antithetical to the Founders' vision."
The institutions jeffsarc was saying need to be protected in the other thread.
Jeffsarc would push back against ANYTHING Trump promoted, no matter how libertarian or beneficial the proposal would be.
They'd both praise the same proposal coming from a democrat. Thats the tell.
How dare you!
Jeff and whitemikesalad are the 2 most libertarian commenters at Reason. That is what Sarc stated as he was leaving the commentariat forever. 4 years ago. Before he came the next week.
Regardless, only a true Team Red hack could believe that DOGE is remotely a libertarian policy change.
They would rather be wrong than look like Trump supporters.
Only problem with what you say is that I've challenged Jesse and the rest of the losers with thousands of bookmarks to provide just one comment of mine where I praise any policy or proposal from a Democrat, and they have failed. Why? Because such comments don't actually exist. You think they do because your retarded binary-thinking brain translates criticism of Trump into praise for Democrats, but that's not what the words actually say.
On the other hand I've given Trump plenty of credit where it was due. The opportunity doesn't happen often, but when it does I do. You think that never happens because when you look at such comments your retarded binary-thinking brain translates them into blank space, because such comments can't exist in your tribal mind.
Look at you try to parse it to a small specific example of a specific policy because you know we have your general comments and statements. Posts like crying about lost of trust in institutions, Biden recognizing the constitution, support of their lawfare, saying we need to raise taxes to fight the deficit, etc etc.
This is another Jeff trick where you try to temper general claims into a small specific demand that you then claim disproves all the other general comments given.
You're not intelligent enough for rhetorical tricks sarc.
Alcoholism has taken it’s toll on Sarc faster than diabetes has on Pedo Jeffy. I also suspect Sarc is older than Jeffy. Who I picture as a slightly effeminate, morbidly obese dork.
Whereas Sarc is just Rickety Cricket from ‘Sunny’.
https://www.watchmojo.com/articles/top-10-worst-things-that-have-happened-to-cricket-on-it-s-always-sunny
For one, you excused biden's policy of holding of documents, while attacking trump for the same thing.
Not one example out of the thousands and thousands of comments that he’s bookmarked over the years. Not a one.
Doubles down despite his rhetorical trick is called out.
Find one policy Trump has written any of us support. Just one.
Has to be a policy he wrote.
It's not a rhetorical trick. It's a demand for evidence from my accuser.
Turning the burden of proof doesn't change the fact that you've got absolutely nothing to back up your claims, because they're all lies.
Youre changing what my charge is to be about specific policy, not general behaviors.
You’re too dishonest to realize it. Now cite the Trump written policy I support. I demand the same requirement you are making.
I’ve challenged Jesse and the rest of the losers with thousands of bookmarks to provide just one comment of mine where I praise any policy or proposal from a Democrat, and they have failed. Why? Because such comments don’t actually exist.
This is not the appropriate test, instead it is a dodge trying to create a defensible position. The correct test is to apply the same standards using the same principles to all parties. We've provided thousands of examples of sarc failing this test, including today.
Riiight.
Except that I don’t reflexively push back on everything Trump proposes (I like this DOGE idea for example), and I’ve never praised any proposal from a Democrat because they haven’t proposed anything worth praising.
You go around calling people liars, telling them what they think, and then calling them liars when they say you’re wrong. If the people you go around attacking actually thought those things, why do they never defend them? Did you ever wonder about that?
Then why have you supported raising taxes to “fix” the deficit.
Why did you support both impeachment and all but 1 lawfare.
Why did and do you support j6 convictions.
Why do you push false dem narratives.
Why do you rarely criticize democrats at all.
You ignore your own behaviors and the vast majority of posts. Even in articles critical of dems you dont criticize them, you rush in to throw shit at conservatives. Deflection from criticism. Want me to go back through the last 10 articles critical of a Democrat and post your comments again?
*sigh*
One of these days you'll say something with a grain of truth in it. Just one little grain. You've got to screw up sometime.
Dude, they've got links and can quote your exact words; words that you'll, of course, deny you actually meant what you actually wrote.
Your consistent mockery and misrepresentation of conservative positions and the corresponding lack for progressive positions tells the real story.
For fuck's sake, you called Jeffy and whitemikesalad the most libertarian commenters on Reason. Jeffy is a vocal supporter of critical race theory and came up with the bears in trunks metaphor to defend his claim that being unvaccinated was a violation of the NAP. whitemikesalad is an idiot $0.50 shill.
Trolls gotta troll, troll, troll.
Your consistent mockery and misrepresentation of conservative positions and the corresponding lack for progressive positions tells the real story.
Mockery yes. Misrepresentation, no. And I attack progressive positions plenty. It's just that those comments go ignored because they don't fit the narrative, like articles from Reason critical of Biden.
You made this claim the other day when you stated the vast majority of your posts attacked the left. This is a lie. I don’t know who you are tricking accept yourself.
This is easily seen by just looking at YOUR posts in any dem critical article.
I’m making the offer. Do you want me to post?
You’re so deluded.
I can even specifically search for the last 10 Biden articles. Want to make a bet that you have fatlr more comments attacking conservatives or your enemies? Bet I don't even find more than 1 comment from you reluctantly admitting the criticism is slightly valid.
In fact you have FAR more posts saying democrats have good intentions than you do criticism of them. Another defense of Democrats. Because you attribute any conservative policy to being immoral, racist or xenophobic.
Yes, Sarc, your comments are chock full of misrepresentation. And show us where you actually attack progressive positions without claiming "boaf sidez" at the same time.
So is that a yes you do? I mean you want the truth.
I'm not so sure he can handle the truth. Might send him back inside a bottle of Boone's Farm again.
Except that I don’t reflexively push back on everything Trump proposes
Again, not the correct test.
You go around calling people liars,
I have no problem calling people who lie liars.
telling them what they think
For example, this is a lie. I point out when people use principles to criticize something when the same principle should lead them to criticize something that in reality they defend, minimize, or ignore. You pretend this is "telling them what they think" because you're trying to recover a shred of credibility and the truth won't help.
If the people you go around attacking actually thought those things, why do they never defend them?
They're smart enough to know it would cost them credibility. The framework I use is no different than pointing out someone is racist because they are outraged by an act by one ethnic group they accept from others. They don't have to come out in favor of the act by others for the conclusion to be supported. No one has a problem with this framework in this context, yet you want to pretend it is illegitimate solely because it is applied to you.
Did you ever wonder about that?
There's no need to wonder since the reason is obvious. Your entire purpose here is attacking the right and using consistent standards and principles would make you vastly less effective. So you claim the analysis itself is invalid hoping some small portion of the audience will fall for it and you can remain effective with them.
Oh, I see. You judge what people think based not upon what they say and do, but upon what they don't say and do. You come up with imaginary explanations, and call people liars when they disagree. And you truly believe you're right because what you feel is the only explanation for them not saying something or not doing something.
In other words, you're scum like Jesse.
It's revealing you can't directly refute anything I said so you resort to word vomit. What I wrote everyone does to some degree.
For example yesterday you criticized Trump supporters by claiming they WOULD accept a protest threatening immigrants if done by other Trump supporters. That hasn't happened, but you feel comfortable asserting this conclusion based on nothing at all and thereby implying their own criticism of left wingers similarly doing this in Jewish neighborhoods was illegitimate.
But today you claim that applying the principles you use in your own judgements to groups or events you wish we would not apply them to is creating "imaginary explanations".
If imaginary explanations are so wrong as you say above why did you use them yesterday to attack Trump supporters? And in particular note that what you did unequivocally fits this definition while what I did clearly does not. If these are fair standards for you to expect why do you literally never apply them to yourself or left wingers?
If you have trouble figuring it out just ask anyone. They all know.
He's scum because he called you out on what you actually do here. You claim "boaf sidez" whenever and wherever possible to deflect from what anyone on the Democrats' side like Jeffy and Mike do here.
Him and Jeff were calling me garbage in the other thread lol. Just like they did yesterday.
Yet hours later they claim moral high ground.
I point out when people use principles to criticize something when the same principle should lead them to criticize something that in reality they defend, minimize, or ignore.
But you don't know what the *actual* principle is. You ASSUME that you do, and you project that assumption onto people. And it certainly seems as though once you have that assumption in your head, it stays there and can't be changed even by direct evidence from the people you are challenging.
Your entire schtick is to pretend to be outraged by people who don't live up to the principles that you project onto them. It's just trolling.
But you don’t know what the *actual* principle is.
Of course I do, just like a construction engineer looking at a house already built can understand the frame. If I was actually wrong you would express that at the time. But in reality you can't so you try to circle back later and claim I was wrong when the specifics aren't handy for people to judge for themselves. That's why I point out your failures when you make them.
No you don't.
If I was actually wrong you would express that at the time.
I don't know what to express at the time according to your standards, because I cannot read your mind to know what is the caricature or principle that you expect me to conform to.
Jeff and him try this rhetorical sleight of hand often.
Sure they agree with the general narratives of the dem. But they wont ever support a specific direct policy in total, so ignore their general support.
WTF is "the general narratives of the dem"? I support objective reality even if it is a Democrat that observes that objective reality. Do you?
This is like when you and your team criticized Chase Oliver for wearing masks VOLUNTARILY during a pandemic, because according to your team, no one should ever validate what any Democrat says even if it happens to be right.
You guys remind me of the typical backbencher in a legislative body. You'll hem and haw while nitpicking little shit, but when it comes time to put up or shut up, you do neither while whining that the "mean girls" are treating you badly.
Poor sarc.
'Meanwhile, since information wants to be free, "an unidentified hacker has gained access to a computer file shared in a secure link among lawyers whose clients have given damaging testimony related to Matt Gaetz."'
If the 'hacker' accessed the secure serves where sealed court records are stored, then a lot more information is out there and it constitutes a serious data breach where PII of thousands of people are endangered.
Since no such alarm has been raised, it seems far more likely that a partisan employee provided copies of the files or provided the access to the 'hacker' for the express purpose of downloaded these records and only these records.
Expect the investigation, if there is one, to quickly find nothing of interest.
So far the investigation seems to have been "I sent an email to the account used to do the hack, but got no response."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hacker-got-damaging-sealed-testimony-against-matt-gaetz-attorney-says/ar-AA1unCDW
"I have not been able to identify the person who downloaded the files, but I have contacted the email address provided, asking the person to identify him or herself, instructing that their access is not authorized, and telling them that they should destroy the materials they downloaded," Wermuth wrote. "My email was returned because the email address was not found."
Joornalism!
Well, they're still very much looking into finding the Supreme Court Dobbs decision leaker, and whoever left that baggie of cocaine at the White House.
Right?
Who is Joe Biden?
Joe Biden himself couldn't answer that question.
The president's wife, according to him.
Who is the asshole who tried to force me to take an experimental drug?
If you would’ve taken it voluntarily, there would’ve been no need to force you.
If only I could have won victory over myself; and learned to love Big Brother.
Some old man that flights of stairs like assaulting.
Is this like a John Galt thing?
Corn Pop's worst nightmare?
What is Aleppo?
...information about his possible lawbreaking seems relevant to the senators who will be asked to vote to confirm him.
I would hate to see a lawbreaker in a federal government.
Then don't look.
"libertarian hero for flouting age-of-consent laws"
WTH Liz?
Pedos everywhere cry huzzah! "We're libertarian heros! We're not sexually abusing children...We're flouting age-of-consent laws!"
Also funny that the same organization writing articles about repealing licensing laws/requirements is claiming that political appointments are "not qualified." (And as others have noted, have not posted a list of "requirements.")
Reason, are you saying that Gaetz needs an AG license if he wants this job?
Or at least a masters in Attorney Generaling.
Wouldn't that be Attorneying General?
Well done, sir or ma'am
Yeah. I'm about as individual/private property rights minimal government libertarian as one can get, but I'll be damned if protecting children from sexual predators isn't one of the few things a minimal government shouldn't be doing.
I'm not for really most presidential emergencies because they smack of martial rule…
Get a load of this cuck. Complaining about this kind of thing is for when your party isn't the one wielding power.
Israel has fiercely contested the court's allegations, which include the use of starvation as a weapon of war and 'intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population.'" Many Israelis—even those who oppose Netanyahu or believe he has erred—are highly critical of the ICC's actions on this front.
Israel provides the majority of sustenance to Gaza. Believe the average is 1500 calories a day for every Palestinian. Hamas steals this aid and resells and controls it.
This claim is nonsensical.
You mean the recent looting of aid wasn't just a mostly peaceful protest.
Maybe if UNRWA wasn't a Hamas front (with UNRWA employees being Hamas and part of these thefts) and let IDF protect the convoys, food would reach the people...?
"Making matters worse, the UN demands Israel ensure the aid isn't stolen but also won't allow Israel to provide armed security to protect the aid. Then, the UN accuses Israel failing to allow the delivery of aid to Gaza civilians. "
https://x.com/daniel_c_roth/status/1858881454714884278
Daniel Roth
@daniel_c_roth
Follow-up: UN won't accept security from Israel but still blames Israel when supplies get looted. How do you square that circle?
UNRWA
@UNRWA
A joint 109-truck
@UN
convoy carrying food supplies to people in #Gaza was violently looted on 16 November. The vast majority of the trucks, 97 in total, were lost and drivers were forced at gunpoint to unload aid.
Due to critical shortages of flour, all eight UN-supported bakeries in Deir al Balah and Khan Younis have been operating at diminished capacity for weeks. Many have been forced to shut down entirely.
Without immediate intervention, severe food shortages are set to worsen, further endangering the lives of over 2 million people who depend on humanitarian aid to survive.
The Israeli authorities continue to disregard their legal obligations under international law to ensure the population's basic needs are met and to facilitate the safe delivery of aid. Such responsibilities continue when trucks enter the #GazaStrip, until people are reached with essential assistance.
I have to figure that the US contractors who were killed with missiles a while back were in on the looting. NPR allowed the father of one guy to mewl about his dead son immediately afterward, but then even they dropped it. The lefty media would never drop anything as juicy as Americans killed by Israelis unless they were told to by their CIA handlers.
The arrest warrants are a moral travesty, and rooted in antisemitism.
It says a lot when Lapid, Gantz, Barak and Eisenkot (all who loathe Bibi) all say it is bullshit, and antisemitic.
BTW...the average is 3,000 kCal daily per gaza resident, based on the amount of aid shipped in.
Is that the Israeli funded portion or total of all aid?
Granted it is starvation levels if under 10k if they have a lot of jeffs there.
Isn't Israel not a member of the ICC, so that they don't have any actual jurisdiction here? Or am I thinking of the USA and/or another BS international court / legal entity?
Israel is not a member of the ICC, and thus the ICC does not have jurisdiction over things that happen in Israel
However, the so-called State of Palestine did ratify the ICC, and accordingly the ICC claims it has jurisdiction over Gaza.
Correct Israel isn't a signatory, but any member state is obligated to arrest Bibi if he steps into their jurisdiction. Of course a member state can ignore that (see recent Putin visit to Mongolia) and I think all you get is a stern letter. The ICC is a complete circle jerk of worthless bureaucrats.
Basically, the entire idea of global cooperative agreements are nothing more than circle jerks. It's been the same since Japan walked out of the League of Nations after they got scolded for invading China.
Agreed.
Yeah, but the global socialist-media industrial complex manipulates people through feelings, not sense.
I wonder if more legislators on the right will come out of the woodwork and start cautioning Trump to be careful about his deportation approach.
Hopefully they do it by insulting him and making him an enemy right out of the gate. That always works.
Be fair. The New Democrats have become the party of the elites, and the snooty (ex?)GOP clique does not want to be left out.
industrious people not consuming welfare who have shown themselves to be no threat at all to the safety of their communities deserve leniency and an easier pathway to citizenship.
Costs aren't just welfare, they also include medical and education costs. Quit minimizing the problem.
Everybody pays property taxes, directly or indirectly through rent and shopping.
Every worker pays payroll taxes.
Quit ignoring the other side of the equation.
"Every worker pays payroll taxes."
Not when they are paid cash under the table...
And how does the employer account for those expenses? Sooner or later it has to be accounted for, and taxes will be paid, sooner or later.
Um no. As long as we still have cash neither the dollars in or the dollars out end up on the books. It's not difficult.
It's revealing you have to pretend those are being ignored to make your point. Do you not have any true points to make?
It's revealing that you have to ignore what I point out is being ignored, in order to not make any points yourself.
It’s revealing that you have to ignore what I point out is being ignored,
But of course it isn’t ignored. Those are natural flows of being “industrious” which includes earnings and everything paid from those earnings.
Illegals are net negative to taxation. Immigrants in general are slightly negative. When you factor costs against tax revenue.
Poor citizens are also net negative. Apparently being an immigrant isn't quite so important a differentiation.
Yes. They are. Don’t see how calling citizens out makes a positive argument to import more net negative taxpayers. It is actually a very weak argument. But it seems to be a common justification when you can’t prove an actual benefit.
Import more poverty at taxpayer expense isn’t a libertarian argument at all.
I'm good with ending all forms of welfare. Citizen or immigrant. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> I’m good with ending all forms of welfare. Citizen or immigrant or corporate. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
FIFY
Brit Out
British state media confirms ‘Storm Shadow’ strike deep inside Russia
London allegedly follows Washington in allowing Kiev to use Western long-range weapons against Russian territories.
Rapefugees running amok, Bidenflation there too, prime minister revolving door. But handing out missiles to bandera dictators seems like a priority.
WWIII will distract people from domestic issues.
My team good guys. Other team bad guys. Me root for my team.
Piping Up
Germany knew in advance about Nord Stream attack – media
Berlin had been warned about an upcoming Ukrainian attack on the Nord Stream pipelines but dismissed those reports, Der Spiegel has said.
One would think Berlin could have apprehended those two drunk fisherman beforehand.
Now we have Denmark capturing a Chinese liner accused of cutting cables. The detaining the ship is obviously revenge and shouldn't be tolerated according to some.
CIA supported Ukraine saboteurs also went after Black Sea pipelines to Hungary and Turkey, also NATO members. NATO should have attacked Ukraine for terrorism against Germany, attempted terrorism against Budapest, and attempted terrorism against Ankara.
Finally, the truth is coming to the surface.
Sure but by that same logic NATO should have attacked Russia before Crimea was even annexed when they murdered Litvinenko and Sturgess or the poisoning of the Skripals and Rowley in England.
Not at all, sarc.
How so? Murdering a British citizen on British soil by the hands of FSB agents is an act of war.
Your comments look like stuff sarc posts. That’s how so.
Lmao, I'll need to start drinking to achieve his level.
Nope, just pointing out the Russian government murdered an innocent British mum with a nerve agent, committing a terrorist act. Let alone the rest of their terrorist acts on NATO soil. Why are you so upset at that?
Those are not acts of war. I think you have the ability to be dumber than sarc if you did consume as much alcohol as he does.
I don't think that's possible. Sarc is about as dumb as they come, booklicking Jeffy and White Mike consistently.
LMAO Chumbucket, terrorism isn't an act of war... LOL that is the stupidest thing I've heard on this board in awhile.
But too be fair I do skip over the Misek posts so may not be a complete sample.
Sarc 2, an individual murder isn’t an act of war unless it would be something like a leader or an heir to leadership (q.v., what Gavrilo Princip did though it was stupid of Vienna to have done so). If that were the case, then CIA activities would compel the world to go to war with the US.
Things like the Zimmermann telegram and Pearl Harbor are acts of war.
I did the research and easily found that the pipeline was only 300 ft below the surface where it was sabotaged. It would not have taken some elite underwater demo squad to blow it. There are 1000s of rig divers all over the world who engage in more dangerous work.
The CIAs insistence that Ukraine couldn't have done it is enough to convince me they did and the CIA greenlit it.
The vassals don't have the balls to stand up to their feudal lord.
Huh? Are the Chinese building artificial islands in the Baltic Sea?
It is an attack on foreign infrastructure. Common tactics.
https://apnews.com/article/matsu-taiwan-internet-cables-cut-china-65f10f5f73a346fa788436366d7a7c70
https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/18/europe/undersea-cable-disrupted-germany-finland-intl/index.html
2nd link is new one.
Someone also recommended the book "Unrestricted Warfare" by the Chinese PLA. It's 25 years old but apparently still quite valid. (I haven't had a chance to start reading it yet.)
I’ll get a copy.
What amuses me is China isn’t even hiding the purpose of a lot of their actions. Even on trade they admitted the cheap subsidized manufacturing is to cripple the US manufacturing base. They are open about it. Unfortunately CEOs seem have to forgotten the costs of supply chain disruption despite seeing the continued costs of it since covid.
Take a look at the delays on 2025 toyotas due to manufacturing disruption regarding parts.
Unfortunately CEOs seem have to forgotten the costs of supply chain disruption despite seeing the continued costs of it since covid.
They haven't forgotten. They've been getting paid off to allow it, just like the politicians of both parties that sold this country out to them.
I'll say it again, Nixon opening relations with China was the worst strategic mistake in the country's history.
Blinken Plinkin’
Outgoing United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, in one of his few and likely the final actions regarding Venezuela, recognizes Edmundo González, now exiled in Spain, as the rightful President of Venezuela
This comes 6 months after the fraudulent elections in Venezuela, where the Chavista Regime, having clearly broken the Barbados Agreement that it signed, clearly rigged the electoral process, provoking the anger and frustration of even its regional allies, such as Brazil and Colombia.
- Bellum Acta
Stopped clock moment.
How dare democrats become election denialists.
Now doing shit for laughs--and maximum global instability.
“Hey, that looks like what we did. Yeah, definitely cheating.”
Late night counts.
Arresting those looking to investigate.
Common voting metrics invalid.
Nothing to see there.
LOL, yeah, that'll show 'em. What a bunch of useless poodles we have for "experts" and "leaders."
JFC Liz, that’s NOT “what happened”. Read Mollie Hemingway’s piece in the Federalist.
What happened was a former county tax accessor MG hung out with met “the victim” on a sugar daddy site, and was busted for this and other crimes, asked Gaetz for help in getting out of trouble, and he refused. The guy then had the “sugar baby” and her roommate (“the witness”) make the allegation (he is their source of legal funding for their legal troubles), just like they had also done to one of local election opponents, and someone else he got cross with.
The DOJ would not touch this with a 10ft pole for fear of being laughed out of court
Everybody hates Gaetz in the Congress, probably for good reason considering his propensity to burn bridges, but this shot is laughably corrupt and you shouldn’t be spreading it
I'd welcome a Sullum article on this. He likes to trot out lots of references, some even relevant, and it would be interesting to see what he leaves out and what he considers important.
Sullum did his article a few days ago. He left everything out known and cited in the Federalist piece.
That was subpar even for Sullum. Most of his deep dives are much more detailed. That's what I'd like to see. I don't think he dares do it.
I find his deep dives are always one sided like he is cribbing from Vox.
We had to link to the Federalist article in the comments. A not so uncommon activity here.
I'm waiting for sullum to use sarc as a reference
Mike Laursen would reference his own socks for cites. So plausible JS:dr cites a sarc post.
Mike Laursen 3 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
White Knight pointed out, correctly, that you are very logical, but quite unaware that you often engage in not seeking out information that goes against your narratives, garbage-in/garbage-out logic, and not checking your conclusions for basic sanity. You should have listened to White Knight.
ducksalad 2 weeks ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Actually, Chumpy, one thing I do have in common with Mike Laursen is that I think ENB is generally on the right side of things. Her main issue isn’t my main issue but when she weighs in on other stuff it’s usually pretty good.
He can't help it.
HO2 shed moments here in the comments.
This, incidentally, is also how we know Dicksalad is White Mike. Who the fuck else would say he has something in common with Mike Laursen and praise ENB with his nose so far up her butt, he can see daylight?
It is an article of faith at Reason that lawfare is totally cool if the victim is on their enemies list (see Trump, J6 protesters, Mackey etc.). The view is shared by every Reason editor including the beloved Liz. Not a single one has said a word about J6 protesters serving prison time for parading on public property. Not one. Reason has deemed Gaetz to be unqualified because he is not sufficiently entrenched in the deep state. But fake sex charges are low hanging fruit that provide cover for radical statists like Sullum. The facts are irrelevant.
Now the TSA is rolling out its own facial-recognition technology, which could make Clear redundant.
You won't be able to board if you're carrying more than 3.4 ounces of fluid in your face.
Does that include botox? Asking for a former Speaker.
The International Criminal Court on Thursday issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu...
Lol.
Did anybody Nazi this coming?
Muslim Nazi charges Israelis. Totally legit.
Meanwhile, in Amsterdam...
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/11/20/why-they-refuse-to-see-jews-as-victims/
It was the speed with which the racism fearmongers became racism deniers that was most unnerving. Virtually overnight, as men whose only crime was their Jewishness were still being patched up in Amsterdam hospitals, the preening racism denouncers of what passes for the Euro-left were saying this wasn’t racism. The very people who see racism everywhere could not see it here, in the broken teeth, black eyes and bloodied faces of Israelis who became the prey of a self-described Jew hunt earlier this month in Amsterdam. Confronted with beaten, bruised Jews, they said, for the first time I can remember, ‘Maybe it wasn’t a hate crime. Maybe it was something else.’
It has been extraordinary. The people who wring their hands over the racial microaggression of asking a woman in African garb ‘Where are you from?’ were positively blasé about the racial macroaggression of a mob smashing in a man’s face because he ‘helped a Jew’. The people who cry ‘Islamophobia!’ when a schoolkid lightly scuffs a page of the Koran struggled to see the Judeaophobia in a gang of self-styled Jew-hunters accosting men and asking them: ‘Are you Yehudi? Are you Jewish?’ The people who madly insist that every tabloid piss-take of Meghan Markle is an act of unforgivable ‘racist bullying’ refused to accept that ‘Jew hunters’ on mopeds who fired fireworks at Israelis might have been racist bullies.
And in this retelling, in this ruthless confiscation of the rights of victimhood from the Israelis battered for being Israelis, the ‘Jew hunt’ came to be reimagined as ‘street justice’. That’s how one left-wing commentator in the UK referred to the hunting and assaulting of the visiting fans – these ‘notoriously thuggish’ football followers started a fight in the Dutch capital and ‘the street justice [was] swift’.
Yes, some Maccabi fans behaved badly, as do fans of virtually every club in Europe. But this neither excuses nor even explains the ‘Jew hunt’ organised by gangs of mostly Arab men. To all who take morality seriously, there can be no causal link between idiot behaviour by a few Israeli fans and the pursuit of ‘Yehudi’ through the streets of a city for a videoed beating. This is my question for those describing the invective and violence visited on random Israelis as ‘street justice’ for what other Israelis did hours earlier – if some black football fans behaved badly would it be understandable if white-supremacist thugs then went on a ‘n***er hunt’? A simple yes or no will do.
It's sad that there are so few honest voices in media I knew who wrote that before I looked.
Thousands of left-media voices produce zero honest articles so a niche tech magazine fills the void.
"produce zero honest articles"
Have you been to a journalism department (or just any college campus) since 1950?
Not a surprise that alt-right commenters here are completely in synch with the Wolfe/Reason/NYT tools. Supporting genocide and the total destruction of AMERICAN credibility in the world.
I'm not a fan of Judge Napolitano but at least he's a 'libertarian' and has a better take (with his guest Jeffrey Sachs) on the Netanyahu arrest warrant than any clown (commenter or author) at this genocidal shit-rag.
JewFree has spoken.
...the reality that the increasingly affluent American population wants to live in big homes.
Next you'll be telling me they don't really want to eat bugs.
You will own nothing and you will be happy.
Or else.
This is just persuasion! - Jeff.
It's meant to encourage, not force... - Also Jeff
Nobody needs more than 5 rooms. Fucking kulaks.
5 rooms? Look at the Lord of the Manor over here.
He should resign and let Harris serve out the last 2 months.
Yeah, like she's any more competent for the job.
Even with her black girl powerups she couldn't beat the mini-boss, Trump, even once. Why would anyone assume she can defeat the final boss, Putin?
Sure, but we'd get the first black, Indian lady president title out of the way without having to bear the cost of her policies.
Don't be so sure...Special K has 59 days to fuck things up even more.
58. 1 day at least to get an official portrait and new letterhead printed; making it once less day then Biden who is more than capable of fucking things up even more.
Like it matters.
What difference at this point does it make?
I've been asking for months why Biden wasn't 25th Amendmented. Never have gotten an answer.
He’s sharp as ever!
That's 100% true.
And safe and effective.
No side effects.
Because the GOPe and the Democrats didn't want to explain how he became president in the first place.
Per jeff, there was never any evidence of Biden’s decline. None.
1. “clap for that, you stupid bastards”
2. “Dogface pony soldier”
3. Challenging a voter to push-up contest
4. Falling up the stairs of AF1
5. Falling down various other places
6. Wandering aimlessly onstage after speeches
7. Reading stage directions during speeches
8. The Hur report declaring him incompetent in the documents case
Nothing to see here, move along… but then Joe bombed the debate with trump, showing terrible polls, and all of a sudden his decline was OBVIOUS.
Get a load of the guy that forgot Jackie! Is she here?
Helmut Kohl as well.
The wheel chair guy asking him to stand.
Those are fighting words. Prepare to settle your differences with pants shitting Biden (D) at the bottle box!
Is there any particular reason to assume Biden is competent to be president right now? It's a very difficult job. It's a dangerous world. Extremely high-stakes decisions in Ukraine. He should resign and let Harris serve out the last 2 months.
No way his ego lets him step down.
Or Jill's.
Ego and a desire for revenge is all that keeps Joe alive.
And an almost fanatical devotion to his children... He still needs to pardon Hunter.
There’s still time for another dozen home refi’s.
Release the JFK File, Epstein List, UFO/UAP Files and now the Gaetz Report!
Release. It. All.
If Gaetz is innocent the truth will come out when we are allowed to examine the sources, like with what happened with the Steele Report and the Senate Report on Russiagate. They will no longer be able to smear via innuendo and strategic leaks.
If he isn’t, then fuck him.
Keeping it under wraps is not a good look.
It needs to be released and people need to be allowed to make their own decisions.
But what if people draw the wrong conclusions?
Reeducation camps.
Agreed. Let’s have the most transparent government since Obama. I haven’t checked the news since 2008, but I assume that’s how it went. Right?
Obama is to transparency as __________ is to __________.
Ummm, Obama is to transparency as Earth-based Human Skeptic is to racist?
a. jeff, logic
b. sarc, sobriety
c. trueman, tether to reality
d. shrike, functioning mental faculties
e. mikesalad, platonic attitude to ENB.
f. Misek, Righteous Among the Nations
g. JD Vance, not being wrong
"transparent... since Obama"
What's the penalty for a President secretly employing the Director of the FBI, the Deputy Director of the FBI, the Chief of the Counterespionage Section of the FBI, the Director of the CIA, the Director of National Intelligence, and members of the Justice Department and the State Department to gather dirt on members of the opposition political party in an effort to ensure his former Secretary of State wins the Presidency?
Obama’s FBI used a bogus file of fiction bought by Hillary’s campaign to mislead a judge so it could spy on the nominee for the other party and then pressure a probe after GOP victory, but this isn’t a scandal about the corruption of Democrats or DOJ because shut up bot.
See my comment about Obama above. This was definitely in character and habit for Obama himself. The Clinton campaign created the document with his approval. I've long come to the conclusion that Obama and the Clintons (Bill and Hillary, moreso Hillary) run the Democratic Party for their own benefit.
Taxpayers funded Laken Riley's murderer's trip from NYC to Atlanta, after having put him up at the Roosevelt Hotel for a while.
-------------------
Illegal alien Jose Ibarra has been convicted of murdering 22-year-old Georgia nursing student Laken Riley.
In September 2022, Ibarra illegally crossed over the United States-Mexico border through El Paso, Texas. He was subsequently released into the country on parole "due to detention capacity" at the border town's Central Processing Center.
On the second day of testimony, Ibarra's former roommate revealed that the 26-year-old Venezuelan national had taken a taxpayer-funded trip to Georgia, where he ultimately murdered Riley in the college town of Athens.
Rosbeli Flores-Bello, the state's 11th witness, testified that after Iberra illegally entered the United States, he stayed at New York City's once-luxury Roosevelt Hotel, which was transformed into a migrant-processing hub, on the taxpayer's dime before flying on a "humanitarian flight" from Manhattan to Atlanta in September 2023.
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, whose three daughters attended UGA, issued a statement reacting to Ibarra's guilty verdict. "This criminal should never have been to enter our country, and he certainly should not have been allowed to stay after shamelessly breaking our laws," the Republican governor said. "Open borders failed Laken Riley."
According to court documents, Ibarra's brother, Diego Ibarra, whom he lived with, has ties to a violent Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, known for taking over apartment complexes and terrorizing residents in Aurora, Colorado. Diego Ibarra, who worked briefly in a UGA cafeteria prior to his arrest, is facing federal green card fraud charges. When police questioned him, he presented a false ID that showed two different birthdates. Currently incarcerated for forging the green cards, Diego Ibarra was called to testify Tuesday against his brother. On the witness stand, he wiped away tears with his orange prison jumpsuit.
In August 2023, the New York Police Department (NYPD) arrested Jose Ibarra, also a suspected gang member of the Tren de Aragua crime syndicate. At the time, he was charged with "acting in a manner to injure a child less than 17" and a motor vehicle license violation, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) confirmed to Fox News. However, he was released by the NYPD before immigration officers could file a detainer to initiate deportation proceedings.
Is the death penalty an option?
Soros DA overseeing the case says no.
Western Judicial District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez only sought a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
Georgia is a death penalty state. However, Gonzalez said she did not think that pursuing the death penalty was in the interest of "justice."
"Our utmost duty is to ensure that justice is served and that the victim's family is an integral part of the deliberation process. We understand that there will be those outside this office who will disagree with our decision and seek to exploit this case for political gain. However, the integrity of our judicial process and the pursuit of justice must always transcend political considerations," Gonzalez said, according to local WRDW-TV.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2024/11/20/laken-riley-verdict-n2648030#google_vignette
I'm on the fence about the death penalty, but if what the media has portrayed (and that's a big if, I grant you) as the facts of the case, this one pretty much called for the death penalty. I can only think she avoided the death penalty because she was playing politics.
For whom?
Gaetz- there are two salient facts. First, the authorities (whoever that was) determined there was insufficient evidence to convict and chose not to prosecute. Therefore, what you call "information" and confidently state, "here's what happened...", is not credible until it has been tested in a court of law with cross-examination, evidence, etc. Second, the voters in Florida, having complete access to this data, returned him to his seat several times. That's how it's supposed to work in a democracy. If every politician was disqualified over rumor and innuendo, we'd all get our wish and have no government at all, cuz there'd be no one left to serve.
Bottom line, leave this crap to the tabloids and focus on the merits of the person, which we will hopefully learn during the confirmation hearings.
It is just weird. Reason in the past has defended confidentiality of grand juries, understanding the potential for abuse of one sided claims.
Yet in this instance they ignore the DoJ dismissal and refusing to charge while supporting the release of essentially a political grand jury document.
Perhaps they can find a Fulton Co., GA DA who will bring charges?
UK is looking to issue summons to Musk for testimony about letting people have free speech on X. Doubt he actually goes.
To be arrested like Pavol Durev? Not a chance. Zoom call or have them come to the US to explain free speech.
Lol, sometimes I think he's secretly working for MAGA.
Fetterman Says Trans Rep. Can Use HIS Bathroom
Now he has 2 months to install the pee cam.
I didn't realize Fetterman was half Japanese.
Like I pointed out the other day, Tim McBride is in this position because he's a ward of the Bidens. Beau called him "a member of the family," which should raise some eyebrows considering how fucked up they are (maybe Beau's skeleton was getting blown by a tranny, it would certainly explain why his wife hooked up with Hunter within 48 hours of Beau being put in the ground).
He was an average theater kid-type of femmy gay guy until he trooned out in 2014 after it turned into a progressive fashion statement. He's where he's at because the Bidens put him there.
Weird.
Nonono... JD Vance is the weird one.
But is there a Tampon dispenser?
If Gaetz broke the law he should be charged. If he didn't, the Justice Department should stop insinuating he did. Neither of those two things are currently happening.
He’s just a well-meaning young man with a faulty libido.
Which law? The law against (far)right politics? The law against not supporting the GOP machine? Other?
I skipped the ICC story since it is referred to as the International Clown Court.
Nobody likes scary clowns.
Pittsburgh likes Killer Clowns from Outer Space. I think they also like Styx.
wrong river.
The yinzers too drunk on Rolling Rock waving their horrible hankies to know the difference.
it's the grand illusion.
It was the best of times.
...to be a blue collar man.
oh mama, I'm in fear for my life ...
Rolling Rock? IC Light
You disrespect the Terrible Towel at your own peril, lol!
RR is/was from Latrobe, in yinzer country.
The nasty napkin is like a localized face diaper for the beer belly brigades.
Yeah, but I always hear about IC as the stereotypical low-brow beer in the 'burgh for Stillers fans.
I know Cowher intentionally left an IC in the mini fridge for Tomlin when Cowher retired as HC.
I've never had IC as I haven't lived in Pittsburgh since I was a small child. RR is actually not a bad beer, though. Yuengling, too, but that's made in the eastern part of the state.
Yuengling brewed in PA is a not so well kept secret compared to how it was. I’m told they have several breweries elsewhere now. Maybe more of an Eagles fan beer…discounting malt liquor. Who the fuck boos Santa Claus?
This Milei-core buddy duo slashing the size of government amounts to a libertarian fantasy come true.
...
Godspeed, fair kings.
Indeed.
"I'm not for really most presidential emergencies because they smack of martial rule…I'm not for the Army marching up and down our streets [to deport people]," said Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) to Newsmax of President-elect Donald Trump's immigration plan. "The American people will be behind him 100% if he goes immediately after the people that have committed crimes…let's go there and start there. There is to my mind some question of the housekeeper who's been here 30 years, and I don't see the military putting her in handcuffs and marching her down the street to an encampment.…There might be an in-between solution where, if they're already working productively, that we allow them to have a work permit. So I would expand, actually, a lot of work permits for people…I think us as conservatives who are supportive of Trump need to caution him about sending the Army into our cities."
If the Trump defenders didn't hate Rand and consider him a leftist before, they sure do now.
Do you honestly think that? I'm not trying to start a spat or insult you or anything, do you actually think there is a significant percent of Trump supporters that hate Rand and consider him a leftist? I think that statement is nonsense.
I said Trump defenders, not supporters. I draw a distinction between the two. His supporters retain the ability to have rational thought. His defenders are completely delusional and go into histrionics whenever Dear Leader is criticized. You know who they are.
And when this doesn't happen, you will claim you preempted it by having made this idiotic post.
This.
Despite many of those he is targeting having already made comments in the thread.
If you want to play with the terminology, then sure, there are some absolute batshit Trumpers.
I think the term "Trump defenders" is too broad to communicate that point.
If someone says "Trump hates black people" and if I say "No, he doesn't", does that make me a "Trump defender"?
If someone says “Trump hates black people” and if I say “No, he doesn’t”, does that make me a “Trump defender”?
histrionics: exaggerated dramatic behavior designed to attract attention.
You decide.
Yes. The is a good adjective for your first post.
Quit picking on retards.
It's not Sarc's fault his Mom drank.
If someone says “Trump hates black people” and if I say “No, he doesn’t”
It makes you a fascist white-supremacist, is what I've learned.
You must have learned that from valiant strawman slayers like Jesse and the Canadian.
Why yes, we do frequently slay your strawmen. Thanks for finally acknowledging that, Drunky.
Sarc is finally showing some honesty. Yesterday he also said my mother was proud of me. Now admits we slay his strawman arguments.
Has he turned a corner?
"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules…that would have gotten you labeled a radical 50 years ago, a liberal 25 years ago, and a racist today." [Thomas Sowell]
You seem to have bought enough straw commodities. Personally, I like taking a flamethrower to your strawmen.
Almost half of the electorate and a significant majority of the government wants to see the President-elect entering prison rather than the White House. Trump needs defending.
That being said, Rand Paul is a fucking national treasure.
Has ANYONE in the comments attacked Rand Paul? I haven't seen one comment calling him a "leftist" as sarc claims.
Define Trump defender? Is it someone who calls out the bullshit lawfare against him you support? The ones who laugh at the Hitler Trump comparisons you make?
Anyone who recognizes that sarc is a lying pile of steaming lefty shit.
You say the same thing about John Stossel... despite all contrary evidence.
Paul is commenting on the extremes, which is not shocking for him.
Hopefully, the first wave will be the low-hanging fruit.
- known criminals;
- the 1.4 million asylum seekers given deportation orders after they did not receive asylum;
- detain and deport each illegal at the courthouse when the deportation order is issued.
I seriously doubt Holman is going after "the housekeeper who's been here 30 years," instead looking at the illegals sucking resources out of cities. Get them out of the community centers and hotels and give them back to the legal residents.
How is your strawman accusation working? See a lot of outrage?
In fact Rand is saying what all your enemies here have stated. Focus on the criminals.
Man you look retarded.
ICC goes after Netanyahu
Reason finally throws misek his bone.
Don't leave out J(ew)free and misconstrueman.
I predict DOGE will turn out to be smoke and mirrors, and the federal budget will grow every year of the Trump administration.
I think this is when you’re supposed to ignore his record and focus on what he says, instead of the usual ignore what he says and focus on his record.
Retard or autistic?
I’ve known smarter autistic people, therefore, I’d say Sarc’s a retard.
Do you really think Biden has anything to do with running the Executive Office? Or ever did?
Uh… Liz…
Libertarian-leaning Republicans who aren’t totally captured by MAGA (like Paul) are an endangered species
…
This Milei-core buddy duo slashing the size of government amounts to a libertarian fantasy come true.
Rumors of the demise of non-MAGA-captured, libertarian-leaning Republicans has been *GREATLY* exaggerated.
As you should know, just because the DNC and Neocons say, “You’re either for us or against us.” and someone replies “OK, I choose Trump.” does not mean that they are MAGA-captured and/or not a libertarian-leaning Republican.
I can't help but wonder if DOGE will investigate all those "missing" billions of dollars, or will it become just another bureaucracy trying to explain its existence 50 years down the line?
"..."The American people will be behind him 100% if he goes immediately after the people that have committed crimes…let's go there and start there."..."
Here illegally? You have committed a crime; out!
"Is there any particular reason to assume Biden is competent to be president right now? It's a very difficult job. It's a dangerous world. Extremely high-stakes decisions in Ukraine. He should resign and let Harris serve out the last 2 months."
You imagine Cackles to be an improvement?
A good point that we've oddly stopped talking about...
@LizWolfe....Young lady, are you serious? There have been many people talking about Brain-Damaged Biden's cognitive problems during the 2020 election.
Did they stop talking, or were you not really listening? It is a fair question.
During the election, sure. How much have you heard since? Thus, "stopped talking about".
In other news....RUS launched single ICBM at UKR, the day after Pres Putin announced a policy change vis a vis use of nukes. This was an unmistakable message to America and NATO. I just want to point out that American troops must be used to enable and provide guidance info for ATACMS missiles. We are in combat now.
When does the Congress start talking about the likelihood of US getting dragged directly into conflict with RUS.
When does the War Powers Act apply?
Who is acting in the stead of the demented (supposed) POTUS? Why has A25 not been initiated?
I can only hope that Putin is in contact with Trump and Trump has made clear he does not want war.
Trump opposes any sort of EV mandate, and there is good reason to think he has popular support for that position:
"Ford, facing economic headwinds and weak EV sales, to cut 4,000 jobs in Europe"
[...]
"FRANKFURT, Germany -- Ford Motor Co. says it will reduce its workforce by 4,000 in Europe and the U.K. by the end of 2027, citing headwinds from the economy and pressure from increased competition and weaker than expected sales of electric cars...."
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/ford-facing-economic-headwinds-weak-ev-sales-cut-116073628#:~:text=Ford%20is%20cutting%20its%20workforce%20by%204%2C000%20in,increased%20competition%20and%20weaker-than-expected%20sales%20of%20electric%20cars
To continue a thread from yesterday:
People who write for a living and even more specifically, the people who edit dictionaries have a duty to protect the language. They are clearly shirking their duty.
“Man” has historically meant “all people” and only ever meant “male” in context where sex is significant. “She is the chairman,” is perfectly understandable even out of context and poses no issue for translation. It is a woke power play to claim it is in any way problematic. Whereas, “She is the chair,” is nonsense without context and untranslatable.
Academia, and by proxy, journalism, has been compromised by people with an agenda. And they continue to win bigly when people fail to protest.
everything not specifically right-wing will eventually be left-wing. ~~ Rush (icr if he was quoting someone else)
It's variously credited to John O'Sullivan of NR and Robert Conquest.
gracias.
People who write for a living and even more specifically, the people who edit dictionaries have a duty to protect the language.
Maybe in France. English dictionaries reflect how words are used, not the other way around.
Sarc’s right this time.
Lexicographer’s jobs are descriptive, not prescriptive.
Sadly, that's how the left wins sometimes, but simply fucking up words from their long-time well-understood meanings into some Humpty Dumpty "words mean what I say they mean" crap.
As an example I argued with a friend a few months back...
The Arctic Ocean Could Be 'Ice-Free' Within the Decade, Researchers Warn
Now, I'm not here to argue about global warming, or climate alarmism, or any of that.
I just want to point out that when you get to redefine terms to not mean what the reasonable reader might think, you can always be right:
The study defines "ice-free" as when the Arctic Ocean has less than 1 million square kilometers, or 386,000 square miles, of ice.
I mean, I could sell ice cream and advertise it as "turd free", but define "turd free" as contains less than one dog turd per 5 gallons of ice cream. But defining it that way sure doesn't seem like I'd be truthful or accurate.
I'm sure that there is some agreement among the artic researchers that 1Msqkm is a critical level, but here's a good time for scientists to make up a term or to use a more accurate term like "Critically low" or "Below the 1Msqkm threshold" or "Lowest ever recorded." Even "below one gargleflop, where a gargleflop is the level of ice scientists believe is a critical threshold for [reasons]". Maybe even "Oh God Oh God we're all gonna die!"
But not "ice-free"! That means something already, something which is not 1Msqkm of ice!
If nothing else, using this term with an asterisk for the redefinition sets up the now almost certain-to-occur scenario where in 2030 (the year in which the scientists are predicting "ice-free(*)" Arctic) someone will visit the Arctic and say "Hey, remember when the scientists said the Artic would be ice-free? Well, I'm standing here on part of a huge ice pack, which I'm told is almost one million square kilometers of ice! Looks like they were wrong again!"
To be fair, I still call jeffsarc fact free despite 1 every 10k comments maybe having an actual fact in them.
To be fair, that's a ratio of 1:10,000, which means the noise far outweighs the signal. It's not even "stopped clock" territory. "Fact free" fits them perfectly.
There is supposed to be a descriptor indicating slang and misuse of a word. Common misuse is not equivalent to common use.
When "figurative" is listed as a definition for "literal" without such a descriptor, simply because idiots insist on commonly misusing it, the editors have literally failed all speakers of English.
When “figurative” is listed as a definition for “literal” without such a descriptor, simply because idiots insist on commonly misusing it, the editors have literally failed all speakers of English.
Their job is to keep track of how words are used, not to tell people how to use them. I understand where you’re coming from, but again that’s not the job of the people who write dictionaries. And I’m sure there are words you use that had totally different meanings a generation or two ago. Take “gay” for example. Flintstones weren’t inviting you to have a homosexual old time. Tolkien’s hobbits weren’t sucking each others dicks. But that’s what the word means now.
“Man” has historically meant “all people” and only ever meant “male” in context where sex is significant.
Yes, exactly.
‘Man’ has always meant human being in English.
In old and middle English males were ‘weremen’ (you see this preserved in ‘werewolf’) and females were ‘wifmen’ (wif is preserved in wife). Wif “female” + man “human being”. ‘Were’ has since been dropped by male writers and wifmen evolved to ‘wimmen’ which became ‘woman’.
So calling a woman a ‘chairman’ is grammatically correct. ‘Chairperson’, on the other hand is modern PC nonsense based on a lack of understanding of the language and its history.
People who write for a living and even more specifically, the people who edit dictionaries have a duty to protect the language. They are clearly shirking their duty.
In turn, if you pull a Stooksberry and kibosh the "Trump KOs DOE With Folding Chair" headline I would be derelict in my duty as a American, to preserve freedom and American culture, and as a Dad, to extoll the virtues of physical culture and preserve the right to puns, if I failed to suplex your cervical vertebrae into your pelvis.
That said, yes, journalism could use more choke slams, folding chairs, and suplexes.
And if I were in charge, I would just keep using those terms as non-gender specific. But I'm not in charge and if a usage becomes common, it eventually becomes what the word means whether I like it or not.
This works fine for every day to day interaction, but is destructive of legal frameworks as scalia used to point out often.
>>"This is antidemocratic and antithetical to the Founders' vision."
it's like everything I've thought since the 80s expressed very loudly by two people who can maybe do something ... edge of my fucking seat.
>>A good point that we've oddly stopped talking about:
yes and no. is Wondertool KH going to swoop in from Wailea and tell Blinken & Co. to knock it off?
>>Oh, and one very convenient side effect of resigning from the House:
how does Senator Gaetz sound?
>> "an unidentified hacker has gained access to a computer file shared in a secure link among lawyers whose clients have given damaging testimony related to Matt Gaetz."
lol are you in the market for a bridge?
>>many customers ... have taken to social media to gripe about how Clear often ends up being slower than TSA PreCheck
I knew I was right to say no to that salesman
>>The International Criminal Court on Thursday issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and the former Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant
are there international constables to serve international arrest warrants?
misek/trueman will volunteer to serve it.
Just after enormous Jew-beating riots in the Netherlands. Everything is coming up roses for JFree, Mtrueman and Misek.
"This Milei-core buddy duo slashing the size of government amounts to a libertarian fantasy come true."
My, my, my. You've certainly changed your tune from, "It's a nice job, if you can get it."
I'm at the point where I simply do not believe any sex-related accusations against any famous person. none. They are all lies.
Kinda bucking the trend by declaring yourself to be a Democrat *now*.
Every time they try to take down a man it's always sex, sex, sex. A guy has to be completely asexual from birth or he's in big trouble.
even if they're all true so what? people say "we're not looking for priests ..." but priests don't even live up to the stereotype anymore.
You really can't hate the media enough...
Stupid headlines...more like "Democracy works as advertised, majority of voters get their choice".
You could reverse the rural for urban and D for R and write pretty much the exact same sort of article (differing on the specific complaints), but no one in the MSM would run such an article, and certainly would never put "Democracy dies in darkness for urban Americans" headline on it.
Opinion: Democracy dies in darkness for rural Americans
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-democracy-dies-in-darkness-for-rural-americans/ar-AA1urZnz
November’s election results were heartbreaking to me and so many rural Democrats who were working hard to help our communities...I live in a town in the rural county where I was born. I returned after being gone for 26 years and was stunned at my community’s decline. In 2016, I ran as a Democrat in my rural district. I narrowly lost in the 2016 Trump landslide. Since then, I have connected with thousands of rural people across the country to better understand why people no longer trust either party and opt to vote for Trump Republicans, and what happened to the once dominant Democratic Party.
Currently, Trump Republicans control many state and local offices in rural counties. According to recent research, up to 58 percent of offices go unchallenged, and in rural places that number is even higher. Democrats are afraid to put up a yard sign and it is very challenging to get people to run. The lack of representation is alarming.
"...The lack of representation is alarming..."
The guy misspelled "satisfying".
Someone at Comcast has decided that unhinged lefty content doesn't draw eyes:
"Comcast to spin off its cable channels, including MSNBC and CNBC, into separate company"
[...]
"
Comcast is planning to spin off most of its cable television networks, including MSNBC and CNBC, into a separate publicly traded company, according to executives with knowledge of the plan.
The spinoff is expected to be formally announced on Wednesday..."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/19/media/comcast-nbcuniversal-cable-spinoff-msnbc/index.html
https://x.com/mattgaetz/status/1859649045553402285
fell on the sword. shoulda kept the teenager off it.
He'll be appointed senator from Florida and people's heads will explode
love it. doubleplus thumb emojis
Said a couple of days ago "I don’t see him getting through confirmation hearings, and he has resigned his House seat. Seems like maybe he was rope-a-doped to the sidelines, while Trump can say “Hey I nominated you, like I said I would…it’s not my fault you screwed up your confirmation. And it’s too bad DeSantis has already filled your House seat…What will you do next? “.
[I know now that the House seat is filled by special election, not Gov. appointment, though.]
Well now this Trump term equals Biden's number of nominees who didn't go through. Biden went 22 for 23. So far Trump is 0 for 1.
I think the strategy should be every time they force a nominee out, replace that nominee with someone even more unhinged. Alex Jones, Mel Gibson, Nick Fuentes, Marjorie Taylor Greene, etc.
When a vtuber becomes the next Attorney General, maybe folks will take the hint and let the incoming President appoint who he wants.
Nick Fuentes was pro Democrat at the end.
Nick Fuentes' belief system is whatever draws the most attention to Nick Fuentes at the moment.
Nick Fuentes is either a fed or fed-adjacent.
Ken Paxton.
On the twetfth day of Christmas, Reason gave to me:
Twelve Kamala hummers coming.
Eleven Act Blue snipers sniping.
Ten illegal hordes now boarding.
Nine fake ladies prancing.
Ate illegals’ beagles.
Seven turduckens a-plucking.
Sex workers twerking-jerking.
OR-ANGE MAN BAD
Four squawking birds.
JD Vance is wrong.
Two sheriff’s tariffs.
And a Robby Soave with his perfect hair.
The removal of three from jd Vance is wrong was very clever.
There were several like that in version 1.0 and I didn’t think it worked well (Abolish everything was #2). Chumby is better than that and was able to play with 6 & 8 for some leeway. Also spelled 12th wrong. 11 may be better without “eleven.”
Bravo! I'll raise my glass of HO2 to that!
A glass of H02 really helps the digestive process after eating a natural turducken!
Gaetz withdraws from being considered as Atty Genl. He and Beavis have a new gig molesting the pre-pubescent on Only Fans.
Maybe we can get the tranny luggage thief back.
He'll take the job in the bag.
> He purportedly had sex with a 17-year-old—below Florida’s age of consent, though all parties claim her age was not discussed—which at least one witness saw.
But… 12-year-olds can consent to sex organ reassingment treatments??
Not “purportedly” but akschually.
"This Milei-core buddy duo slashing the size of government amounts to a libertarian fantasy come true."
the comment you made about RFK Jr on Monday is germane to these two as well: "He gets a few things right, but he consistently muddles the details and blames the wrong culprits."
if I trusted these guys to cut the RIGHT stuff, select the correct size, identify the correct roles & missions, I'd say "godspeed fair kings" as well. but I don't believe for a minute that they can accurately identify fat vs. bone. I fully expect them to get a few things right, muddle the details, and blame the wrong culprits.