Mining Is Safer, Cleaner, and More Ethical in America. So Why Do Environmentalists Stand in the Way?
The U.S. now ranks second to last in the time it takes to develop a new mine—roughly 29 years. Only Zambia is worse.

People eagerly give money to rich environmental groups. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has $463 million in assets.
It claims it uses law "to confront the climate crisis."
What it really does is pay lawyers to torture people who try to do useful things.
Example: America needs minerals like copper and silver to make things. Even President Joe Biden made a speech saying America will need 400-600 percent more such minerals to make "solar panels, wind turbines, and so much more!"
An iPhone alone requires aluminum, iron, lithium, gold, copper.
But when investors dare try to dig up such minerals in America, the NRDC objects and uses political connections to stop them.
Twenty years ago, entrepreneurs tried to open a mine in Alaska. Before they even got the application in, the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) vetoed it.
Why? Because groups like the NRDC say the mine "would be a catastrophic threat to the wildlife and…fragile ecosystem."
They get their way because when Democrats run the EPA, they not only support NRDC's positions, they even hire NRDC employees.
The next Republican administration removed the EPA's veto. The Army Corps of Engineers then studied the mine and concluded that it wasn't an environmental threat.
So, is Pebble a bustling mine today? No.
Democrats got elected and vetoed it again.
Physicist Mark Mills wonders why anyone would try to open a mine in America today. "Why in the world would you put millions, maybe billions of dollars at risk, spending those decades to get a permit, knowing there's a very good chance they'll just cancel a permit? How in the world do you build mines in America knowing that that's the landscape you have?"
Well, you don't.
America now ranks second to last in the time it takes to develop a new mine—roughly 29 years. Only Zambia is worse.
"You start applying for permits," says Mills, "You're going to be waiting not months, not years, but decades!"
Waiting while the NRDC sues and runs frightening anti-mine ads, saying nature will be "destroyed by a 2,000-foot gaping hole in the ground!"
Mills points out their deceit. Today's mines disturb "a tiny infinitesimal pinprick in the landscape" and we do need to disturb the landscape a little, because "we need metals and materials and minerals to build everything that exists to make society possible!"
I confronted NRDC spokesman Bob Deans, saying the NRDC killing mines also kills people's opportunity. He responded that "clean" energy creates jobs.
"We created 50,000 new jobs in this country, putting up wind turbines, solar panels, building the next generation of energy efficient cars. This is where the future is!"
"But also, you need copper and gold," I point out.
"That's right," says Deans, "And we have to weigh those risks."
But the NRDC doesn't weigh the risks. They just oppose American mines.
I asked Deans, "Are there any mines that the NRDC doesn't complain about?
"Sure," he replied.
He said he'd send us some names. But he never did.
I asked again this month. Again, no names.
"Don't hold your breath," says Mills. "The mines that they implicitly support are in Africa."
"Implicitly" because they don't actually say mining should be done in poor countries.
"They don't say that," says Mills, "But the green movement has been perfectly happy outsourcing mining to disadvantaged countries where thousands of children in bare feet, working by hand with shovels, dig minerals out of the earth."
At least in America, children wouldn't be digging with their hands, advanced equipment would make mining safer, and our rules would reduce pollution. You'd think environmentalists would want more mining done in America.
"To have a sane world," says Mills, "we should be doing a lot more of it. Not all of it. But not none."
Allowing America to do more would definitely be good. Our future needs minerals.
"Society can't exist without mines," concludes Mills.
COPYRIGHT 2024 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In the way is where they always stand. When they aren't glueing themselves to the pavement or throwing soup on priceless works of art.
The profit motive harms the environment.
Making goods that only last a few years, if that, and are replaced at full inflationary cost make the rich richer.
Constantly supporting this cycle of greed and waste by taking raw materials from the earth is also more profitable than making products that last 30 years and are repaired through their life as necessary.
That’s why.
"... So Why Do Environmentalists Stand in the Way?"
Because the environ-whackos want all us peasants to live in caves,
drink from streams and eat moss while they reside in their mansions, drive around in their limousines as they eat caviar and drink champagne.
The environmental movement is filled with rich, clueless closet fascists who want to redistribute other peoples' money to the point we're all in poverty as they bring back the stone age.
Show me a "climate warrior," and I'll show you a fascist.
They have no imagination, no creativity, no talents or skills that society values, and no inclination to put in any of the hard work to be useful, so they destroy. It's all they know how to do. They want their participation trophy.
How dare you! "Work", "skills", "property", and "purpose" are all white patriarchal colonizer culture values, and therefore evil. Enlightened people embrace DEI, and dismiss materialism (except that cool beach house, the new Tesla, er, Rivian, and multiple jet trips to cool places).
Amd we allow them to live why?
2 reasons, I think.
They are largely working on a very shallow level of analysis and just react to things they have been trained to be opposed to.
They don't actually value human prosperity and advancement and see humanity as a problem.
Which is ironic, when you consider that the level of human prosperity is one of the most significant correlative characteristics of a society, to how environmentally friendly / conscious they generally are.
Environmentalism is a luxury for sure.
Same old same old!!! This shit has been around for DECADES!!!!
Bill McKibben is an un-reformed, 200-proof, human-hating asshole!
“At its extreme, green ideology expresses itself in utter contempt for humanity. Reviewing Bill McKibben’s The End of Nature in the Los Angeles Times, National Park Service research biologist David M. Graber concluded with this stunning passage: ‘Human happiness, and certainly human fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn’t true. Somewhere along the lineat about a billion years ago, maybe half thatwe quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth. It is cosmically unlikely that the developed world will choose to end its orgy of fossil-energy consumption, and the Third World its suicidal consumption of landscape. Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.’
“It is hard to take such notions seriously without sounding like a bit of a kook yourself. But there they arecalmly expressed in the pages of a major, mainstream, Establishment newspaper by an employee of the federal government. When it is acceptable to say such things in polite intellectual company, when feel-good environmentalists tolerate the totalitarians in their midst, when sophisticates greet the likes of Graber with indulgent nods and smiles rather than arguments and outrage, we are one step further down another bloody road to someone’s imagined Eden. All the greens need is an opportunity and a Lenin.”
From “Free Minds & Free Markets”, Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, 1993, which is a compilation of 25 years of articles from Reason magazine, this one being “The Green Road to Serfdom”, April 1990, by Virginia I. Postrel.
Mining Gets the Shaft
What a lode.
The Seven Dwarfs do SNOT deserve Heaven!!! NO DEI for THEM!!! They deserve to DIE, snot DEI, for their perverse EXCLUSION of The Mother Earth, and Her Deeply Hurt GAIA FEELZ!!!
(I am the Sole Channel to Mother Earth's Deep FEELZ!!! All Hail MEEEE!!!)
They are just concerned that children in Africa won't have labor.
As you know, this is not about mining or the environment. It is about power.
If a country existed that put rights first, e.g., right to property, mining would need only the owner's permission, as long as it didn't encroach on neighbors.
Instead, the worldwide political paradigm is deadly threat, fraud, NOT reason, rights, choice. It's authority worship, i.e., "The Most Dangerous Superstition" (Larken Rose).
Why block mining in the US?
1. Mining is icky, everyone knows that.
2. NIMBY
3. Virtue signaling feels so much better when the target is closer to home.
4. Easier to participate in protests when they are a short drive from campus.
5. Like, native Americans are against the mine, and, like, native Americans are so cool and, like, in touch with nature and stuff, and, like, I want to be cool too, and, like, follow my native brothers and sisters, so, like, we shouldn't have a mine and stuff.
6. Miners did not go to college, they drive pickups, and like guns. Why should we let them have jobs?
7. Mining companies probably donated to Trump.
8. Other nations don't allow the freedom to get away with this bullshit.
9. People in other nations don't accept the guilt trip regarding mining and would tell them to go jump in a lake. Preferably a deep, dark cold quarry.
Oh, that's easy. It's the fundamental difference between Environmentalism and Environmentalists.
Environmentalism is something everyone can, should, and for the most part does get behind. Clean air, clean water, effective use of natural resources - what's not to like. I like environmentalism, you like environmentalism, I'll bet everyone here likes environmentalism.
Environmentalists, however, are - with no hyperbole - a gaia cult. And there is no reasoning with a cultist. Most cults of this fashion (see also: LGBT pedo and BLM) operate from a singular Pro-Cult vs Anti-Cult mindset. It's a form of Critical Theory, and why cult leaders almost always invariably love Marxism. It stokes and preys on an immediate and existential fear, insists on "othering" anyone not 100% in lockstep with the views, it embraces cognitive dissonance when provable facts conflict with their dogma, and usually the folks running things care less about the cause and more about exploiting it for power, money, fame, and idolatry. And the cult's goals have nothing to do with environmentalism, and everything to do with with themselves. Everything from virtue signaling to profiteering.
Environmentalists, however, are – with no hyperbole – a gaia cult.
*ding ding ding!* We have a winner!
Mining Is Safer, Cleaner, and More Ethical in America. So Why Do Environmentalists Stand in the Way?
Because they're anti-human assholes?
You're almost there; try arrogant anti-human assholes.
What about: stupid, arrogant, anti-human assholes?
Missiles in the air.
Basically every night for the last 1000 days...
Not at all related, but something that needs national attention.
Basically a cop shot a baby in Independence Missouri
https://www.kshb.com/news/crime/spokesperson-police-shooting-reported-in-independence
The mother apparently had a knife and was acting distraught, but apparently the cop decided to shoot them both
It was two weeks ago, so I'm in the clear minting my "How do you stop a baby from getting stabbed to death? You shoot it!" dead baby joke, right?
Or am I infringing on the clump of cells' right not to be the punchline of a joke two weeks after it's dead?
" Why Do Environmentalists Stand in the Way?"
Because their goal isn't protecting the environment. Their goal isn't clean energy.
Their goal is deindustrialization and no energy.
So if it isn't the environmental groups getting in the way, it's some politician putting a stop to it because the other Party is in favor of it. Just ask the Biden Administration.
What Climate Crisis?
As long as the weather changes there's a crisis?
And people thought Hitlers excuses for genocide were stupid.
Be careful what kind of 'faith' (UN-founded) BS you buy into.
There is no significant Crisis in the Climate. It didn't happen as predicted in 1990,91,92,93,94,95 etc, etc, etc,... Here it is 50-years later... "The Science" has proven to be BS, after BS, after BS, year after year yet "believers" just keep buying the BS.