After Wrongful Diagnosis, Texas CPS Took This Baby Away
Thankfully, a judge reunited the Boatright family last week.

Last year, on Christmas Eve, Jacqueline Morales Boatright gave birth to a daughter, Evelyn. It was a traumatic experience; Jacqueline had an emergency C-section, and Evelyn was born with bruises and swelling. But the baby pulled through, and Jacqueline and her husband Juan took Evelyn back to their Fort Worth, Texas, home.
Unfortunately, the Boatrights returned to the hospital—a different one—six weeks later, after baby Evelyn developed some strange twitches and started to vomit. The worried parents brought her to the emergency room at Cook Children's Medical Center. Doctors examined Evelyn and took her for testing. Significantly, they noted in her record that she bore no signs of abuse or neglect.
The hospital ordered an MRI and an X-ray. The MRI came back with signs of small brain bleeding, and the X-ray showed an old partial rib fracture that was mostly healed. This led the radiologist to immediately classify Evelyn as a suspected victim of child abuse, even though her injuries were well explained by the circumstances of her birth.
"It seems [the radiologist] never even inquired about the circumstances of her birth or other possible explanations," Jeremy Newman, vice president at the Family Freedom Project (FFP), which became invovled in the case, tells Reason.
Instead, the state's child protective services agency, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), ordered the parents to leave the hospital and placed the baby in foster care.
"It took two minutes, 120 seconds, for someone who never met me to determine I can't take care of my daughter," said Juan Boatright.
The Boatrights were given state-appointed lawyers. The lawyers asked the associate judge assigned to the case to provide them with a medical expert to go over the test results as well as the birth circumstances, and provide a second opinion. When this request was denied, the Boatrights' relatives sold their cars to hire an expert of their own, according to Newman.
This expert, a child abuse pediatrician named Dr. Marcus DeGraw, testified that child abuse should be a diagnosis of exclusion. That is, only after medical experts have ruled out everything else—illness, accidents, congenital issues and, of course traumatic birth—should child abuse be considered the explanation.
In this case, the hospital seemed to have started with the diagnosis of child abuse and never considered other possibilities, says Bradley Scalise, Jacqueline's court-appointed attorney.
DFPS declined to comment.
"CPS cases are confidential, per state statute," says Tiffani Butler, a DFPS media specialist.
Despite the testimony of DeGraw, the judge ruled that the Boatrights had abused their baby and she must be kept in foster care.
The Boatrights immediately asked for a new hearing. Unfortunately, the judge decided to recuse herself, and the case went nowhere.
But just last week, the Boatrights finally secured a hearing in front of a third judge. Retired District Judge Randy Catterton heard from the case worker and two doctors on behalf of Cook Children's Medical Center; he also heard from the Boatright's three experts who each said that child abuse was, in fact, not the only potential cause of Evelyn's injuries. One of these experts testified that the baby's rib fracture is found in only 0.05 percent of abuse cases but is a common birth injury.
The judge did not even wait for final arguments before ruling that Evelyn should be returned to her parents immediately.
Over the past year, the Boatrights were allowed to see their baby just one or two hours per week under strict supervision. Even after Evelyn was finally moved out of foster care and into the home of a family member—an aunt—the Boatrights were not allowed to visit her there; they could only visit with their baby at a third-party location.
On November 14, when Evelyn was finally allowed to return home, she leapt into her parents' arms.
The family is looking forward to spending Christmas, and Evelyn's first birthday, together.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I despise governments and bureaucrats. I despise government bureaucrats most of all. A bunch of damned third parties whose only goals are to expand their budgets, subordinates, and regulations, and never ever do anything which might let a peasant win or put their bureaucracy in a bad light.
As usual I'm left to wonder how these assholes sleep at night. Stealing people's babies? Really? These people are beneath contempt.
As C.S. Lewis sort of said, these people will never face any crisis of conscience because they believe they are doing the right thing.
CPS has way to much power.
I'd like to see some real (ie, non-government) statistics on how many children suffer from parental abuse and how many from foster parent abuse, particularly how much of the abuse CPS prevented and created.
Never gonna happen. Worse than national-level crime data, the people who would compile child abuse data would be the ones who would be on the hook for it.
This has been shown multiple times in multiple places. Chicago Public Schools and the Department of Child and Family Services repeatedly go through bouts of child abuse cover ups that would've shuttered any Catholic Church or non-profit, but which quietly get swept aside because it's the government doing it.
Just as the right and wrong of police violence can't be decided without knowing the race of everyone involved, the right and wrong of children being taken from their parents can't be decided without knowing the immigration status of everyone involved.
Or if they are democrats or not.
A major problem that is prominent in the public sector is a lack of accountability and responsibility. Immunity creates impunity. It is the immunity part of the equation that must be addressed.
Or as I like to say ...
When authority exceeds accountability, you have corruption.
When accountability exceeds authority, you have scapegoats.
The third judge set the boat right.
I was juandering when you were going to chime in.
Was busy listening to an ACDC song about this.
That is valuable baby bonding time lost.
Beware of people who think they are doing the "right thing" for others. That crusader mentality coupled with minding other peoples' business is a dangerous mix.
My wife and I were licensed foster care in our state. We went through 3 months of training, 3 hours per week that we paid for. We spent a year as support where we would take in children on short term basis. This was either emergency situations or relieving other foster parents. We had kids in the house for about a third of the time. We had 2 hours notice for our first foster kids. I had to run out and buy a bed and other items so the kids would have a place to sleep. I still see one of them as we are friends with his adopted parents. We had kids as young as 7 days to 11 years old. For two weeks, we were given exemption to take 4 kids instead of our typical maximum of 2. There were a lot of rules. But,
I think it would be pretty easy for someone with bad intentions to get away with abuse. I was not impressed with the social workers. And my wife got one of the drivers fired for being reckless. One reason we are out of it is it was the risk that something could go wrong and we would suffer for it
You're a better person than most.
Do they have a GoFundMe?
"It seems [the radiologist] never even inquired about the circumstances of her birth or other possible explanations," Jeremy Newman
Why would they? Had it turned out there was abuse, and the radtech didn't report it, said tech would be in some real hot water. (In fact, I'm willing to bet that said reporting is mandatory under state/federal guidelines.)
America made it very clear that they wanted an overly-bureaucratic government-involved health care industry that practices defensive medicine in order to avoid lawsuits.
Don't you DARE complain about the bureaucracy that you asked for. You wanted a special interests guided public health care system? THIS IS WHAT THAT IS.
DFPS declined to comment.
And they won't. Ever. You can interview them, depose them, put them on the stand - their answer will always be the same: "We took the appropriate steps as defined by our state/federal-mandated requirements."
CPS (DFPS) are the absolute scum of the earth. They are unthinking automatons who don't care even slightly for children, families, or anything else. They are NPCs who do as their programming dictates, and if you don't like it - tough. Because they're the government, and they're here to help.
Over the past year, the Boatrights were allowed to see their baby just one or two hours per week under strict supervision.
Now, ask yourself if you think that family will ever trust the public health care system ever again.
And maybe learn something from them, before it happens to you. Or, worse, as you continue to support/defend it in the name of progressivism.
Last time I had an X-ray at a hospital, I didn't even meet the Rad tech who 'read' the x-ray. Let alone had them ask me questions.
Of course it was the same in this case. HOWEVER, the doctor who looked at the x-ray made the final determination and that ultimately went on record.
3 points to note that the story largely omits and that completely rectify the story even potentially with McGraw’s “child abuse should be a diagnosis of exclusion” criteria, and only makes things worse. Points that Reason presumably leaves out to generate clickbait in their typical fashion:
1. Where were the medical records in all of this? It’s convenient to say the Radiologist didn’t inquire about the birth before making a diagnosis but it’s not the radiologist’s job to track down potentially non-existent records. I understand the Boatrights went to a different hospital and may or may not have taken their records with them, but that doesn’t address or fix anything. To suggest, systemically, that doctors rely on the hearsay of laymen to make a (mis)diagnosis is pretty much guaranteed to make the problem worse, not better, in several/all dimensions.
2. What was the actual/ultimate diagnosis or treatment? Because as it stands/as told, the baby was twitching and vomiting, the baby was removed from the parent’s custody, whatever was causing the twitching and vomiting cleared up and/or didn’t kill the baby and/or was otherwise effectively treated. I completely agree that ‘electromagnetic fields from living under power lines’ is junk science but the facts on the ground don’t refute the removal of the baby as effective treatment even for the condition of living under power lines.
3. In line with the above, still in line with McGraw’s guidance and not making the situation one, single iota better: If the “two weeks” in 2020 taught us anything, it’s that a team of doctors under the gun about making a diagnosis will ab-so-fucking-lutely not just take the child out of parents’ custody because they think it’s being abused but will look the parents straight in the eye and tell them they’re taking the baby away because they don’t stand 6 ft. apart and wear masks to keep the EM fields from the power lines from making their baby sick. Even "two weeks" aside, FFS, we had an entire *field* of medicine founded practically overnight, faster than it normally takes to get a lifesaving drug approved even in a fairly 'fast track' regulatory regime, on the idea of cutting off kid's genitals turns them into the opposite sex.
I has a case eerily similar to this in a different state. CPS, instead of bearing a burden of proof, treats its position as the presumption after unilaterally removing children from a home. Unfortunately, judges tend to agree and rarely press back against unaided claims and sloppy casework.
If there's anyone with experience or resources to help change CPS authority in the courts, I'd appreciate recommendations and any help.
The thing to look at here is how DFPS gets to hide behind the wall of "privacy". There needs to be an external review board where "privacy" cannot be used.
Does the law require the judge to weigh the harms of removing a kid from birth parents' care?