Oklahoma Opens Office of Religious Liberty and Patriotism
The taxpayer-funded office will investigate cases where religious freedom is trampled on while the state implements biblical study into the curriculum.

On Tuesday, Ryan Walters, Oklahoma's State Superintendent of Public Instruction, announced the creation of an Office of Religious Liberty and Patriotism at the Oklahoma Department of Education. Advertised as a way to protect freedom of religion, this office will impose Orwellian-like practices that trample individual choice and religious freedom.
The taxpayer-funded office will be tasked with promoting religious liberty and patriotism in Oklahoma by protecting "parents, teachers, and students' abilities to practice their religion freely in all aspects" and will also "oversee the investigation of abuses to individual religious freedom or displays of patriotism," per a press release from Walters.
Oklahoma's Department of Education has a history of ignoring the separation of church and state in public schools. Last year, a high school classroom in Skiatook removed a prominent display of John 3:16 after the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF)—an organization that advocates for atheists, agnostics, and nontheists—filed a complaint on behalf of community members.
In July, Walters unveiled guidelines for how to teach the Bible in Oklahoma schools after he had ordered the inclusion of the Bible in History curriculums just the month prior. "Every teacher, every classroom in the state will have a Bible in the classroom and will be teaching from the Bible in the classroom," Walters stated in June.
By September, during an Oklahoma State Board of Education meeting, Walters had requested a total of $6 million to purchase the 55,000 Bibles needed for Oklahoma schools. At the time, the only biblical texts that met Walters' criteria were King James Version Bibles that included the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, and U.S. Bill of Rights. The Bible was also required to "be bound in leather or leather-like material."
According to Oklahoma Watch, only two Bibles fit the original requirements by the Oklahoma Department of Education, both of which had been endorsed by the Trump family and one of which Donald Trump received compensation for his endorsement.
By October, thanks to a flood of criticism, new guidelines were released that eased the narrow requirements and allowed copies of American founding documents to be provided separately from the Bible.
Walters has called public schools "ground zero for the erosion of religious liberty across our country," and claims that this "directly correlates with declining academic outcomes in our public schools."
In the announcement, Walters also revealed that the Office of Religious Liberty and Patriotism was designed to align with Trump's "Freedom to Pray" initiative and to ensure "that both student and teacher's rights to prayer are protected and upheld."
Superintendent Walters' stated goal of promoting religious freedom runs contrary to the mandate of Bibles in public schools. Instead of advancing religious liberty, as the Office of Religious Liberty and Patriotism claims it will likely promote more religious intervention and state endorsement of certain religious expressions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
End all tax money going to the Education Industrial Complex.
I know, I know. Make actual school choice a thing and expand charter schools then parents can pick schools most closely aligned with their values.
Wait wait, I know what's coming next:
"The state imposing Christianity on schools is no different than the state imposing DEI on the schools. Same same. Therefore I win and you lose."
Democrats did it first, that makes it ok.
Ideas™ !
Yup. And everyone else knows where you stand on rapists masturbating on their victims.
ETA: OMG! A non-sequitor to a non-sequitor!
Film at 11.
ETA2: Can't resist, this is too much fun. Hey, jeffsarc, why don't you rebut the comparison instead of just pretend you know better than everybody else? Prove your smarts.
Christianity isn't racist, protects children, and promotes personal responsibility.
I'd argue it is way better than DEI in schools.
If I had kids in school and had to choose, they'd get whatever Christianity was being forced on them all day long before they'd get a shred of woke bullshit.
Yes, nothing promotes personal responsibility like having someone else die for your sins.
You need to put a sarc tag after your post otherwise people might think you're not joking.
Or one can be consistent and oppose both.
Just sayin'.
That's a fine goal. But pretending one side doesn't exist is not a path forward.
End all government schools.
If we're going to have a separation of church and state, let's have a separation of education and state as well. You cannot trust the state to educate you, the same way you can't trust the state to specify your religion.
And that's the problem with public schools. There is no way to give a child a good education without presenting controversial material. Books and lesson materials have to be ABOUT something. You can't teach reading from a random text generator.
And that’s the problem with public schools. There is no way to give a child a good education without presenting controversial material.
Presenting controversial material is not a problem. It is part of the POINT of a quality education. Education is not supposed to be just creating clones who can memorize facts. Education should be about developing strong critical thinking skills. And a student will never develop strong critical thinking skills if they are never presented anything outside of their comfort zone.
Yes!!! I am glad you finally get it!
Like teaching ONLY woke pronouns, transgender mutilation, white privilege, anti-racism racism ...
So glad you finally see the light!
Glad we can agree on something.
So you can only teach about Communism using a leather-bound copy of Das Kapital?
The proper solution, strangely never mentioned in a libertarian article devoted to free minds and free markets, is a free market in education. Get rid of government control of schools, at the very least; but that's going to be hard to do as long as government is paying for them too.
On the other hand, it makes me laugh that the article never once mentions the left wing woke religions of CRT, DEI, transgender mutilation, personal pronouns, men in women's sports and locker rooms and bathrooms, yet gets its panties in a twist over Bibles in classrooms.
Fire KMW.
Get out of DC and NYC.
Mention liberty in every single article.
That would explain why Reason never talks about charter schools. I mean, check this out. I did a search and there were only 1321 results. That's the same as completely ignoring a free market in education.
https://reason.com/search/charter%20schools/
You can spout off about what has burdened you all you want.
I am talking about this very article. I actually read it. You apparently didn't, or didn't remember it, or decided it was better to change the subject.
You’re offended that the article did not go off on a tangent about non-government schools and instead stuck to the actual subject, and you’re telling me I’m burdened? Lying and accusing someone of doing what you are doing while you are doing it is a favorite dishonest tactic of Jesse’s. I can see you’ve been taking notes. No wonder you defend him. You look up to him.
Nope.
The point of responding to a comment is to add to the conversation, to rebut the comment, to add content, but it must be related to the comment o have any meaning. Otherwise, it's a new topic in the wrong place.
Your comment had no bearing on what I wrote. It is in the wrong place. If you want to start your own comment thread, start a new top-level comment; don't hijack someone else's comment and then whine when you get called out on it,
Oh look, here comes the comment police. Are you related to the grammar police?
Oh look, the change-the-subject police!
the article never once mentions the left wing woke religions of CRT, DEI, transgender mutilation, personal pronouns, men in women’s sports and locker rooms and bathrooms, yet gets its panties in a twist over Bibles in classrooms.
Maybe because the article was about an action by the Oklahoma Superintendent, and he didn’t do any of those things.
Just like you, in your comment, never once mentioned the October 7 Attack, the persecution of the Uighurs, or the missing POWs from the Vietnam War, yet you get your panties in a twist over a Reason article.
Perhaps you are incapable of seeing the resemblance to religion of all those topics, even though you quoted my reference to them as woke religions.
If you want to say those are not woke religions, say so. Don't feign ignorance in the hopes of looking wise like Kamala.
Perhaps you are deliberately trying to shoe-horn your pet grievances into the ill-fitting container of 'religion' in order to construct a bad-faith bothsidesism.
So, SGT, if there’s an article against CRT and DEI being pushed in public schools, are you going to call them out for failing to mention mandated Bibles in Oklahoma?
I’m not going to accuse you of hypocrisy in advance. We’ll wait for such an article and then see what you do.
This hypocrisy test doesn't apply to the rest of us, because we aren't claiming that every single article about some misconduct must find some analogous mirror-image misconduct of the opposing party and discuss it. That's your standard, not ours. Some us aren't hard wired to map every issue onto the US two-party divide.
Woke shit in schools has been going on for a decade or more. Oklahoma just started their version. Louisiana has something similar going on, but I don't recall any Reason article on it.
When a herd of elephants has been tramping all over everything for a decade, the sudden emergence of one or two anthills is not nearly as alarming.
Accusation, insinuation, you'll call it whatever you want and still be wrong.
Oh, so you're saying that DEI is old news, while this Bible thing is new. And then complaining that a current events magazine focuses on the latter.
Yes, dearie. When was the last time Bible thumpers tried forcing every school nationwide to study the Bible?
Or do you think a decade of elephants in every school is less alarming that two anthills showing up in the last year or two?
That doesn't mean pushing Christianity into schools is acceptable either. I have a feeling that what they're actually trying to do is less objectionable than how it is framed here, but I don't want the state forcing all its schools to post the 10 commandments or scripture.
Because of the importance of the Bible in the history of Western civilization, it can be argued that Biblical literacy should be a part of public education. Unfortunately, Christian conservatives would never tolerate a scholarly presentation of the Bible in schools. They would insist their religious interpretation of it be part of the lessons.
I agree with you - either they both should be fine, or they both should be unacceptable.
Gee, an article about religion in public schools does not mention topics that have nothing to do with religion in public schools. It's an outrage!
Thank you Stupid Government Tricks for your wonderful, insightful, apt, and pointed comment.
The author fails to mention the decades long libertarian position of school choice, probably because Trump is calling it a civil right, and the staff has TDS. Note he impugns Trump for compensation received from endorsing a bible (shocking, a celebrity makes money from an endorsement) but Trump had nothing to do with the Oklahoma law, he’s not in office and doesn’t live there.
$6 million questionably bought because government schools exist, vs. huge amounts spent on DEI and other indoctrination shows Reason’s and the author’s priorities.
I second your motions. You should be writing for Reason. And just ignore the trolls. You can leave more gems in other articles’ comment sections that way.
Note he impugns Trump for compensation received from endorsing a bible (shocking, a celebrity makes money from an endorsement)
That's not the issue. The issue is that the regulations in Oklahoma were written in such a way that only two Bibles in print could possibly have met the regulatory standards - and guess what, one of them was the Trump Bible. That is corrupt no matter how you look at it.
When everyone opened up offices and hired officers of Diversity, Inclusion and Equity and the Jo Jorgensen/CATO/Beltway libertarian wing of Reason agreed to disagree, nodded its head, raised its fist and said, "Right on, man", we're supposed get all indignant when they open up another religious office?
It will get shut down when Mohammad wants to talk about the Koran.
I'm sure the Church of Satan is already planning its attack.
Drag queen story hour coming to Oklahoma?
So, which right-wing influencer was the one who first claimed that CRT and DEI are 'religions'? Was it James Lindsay? I am betting it was James Lindsay.
Jeff, you wish to distinguish between religions and other ideologies that propose an unfalsifiable theory of everything. Perhaps you think the dividing line is belief in a divine being. And the dictionary definition backs you up.
But if we're considering the intentions behind the establishment clause, I think CRT in its maxed-out form is the exactly kind of thing that shouldn't be "established" by the state. The point of the clause was to avoid the civil discord caused by forcing people into situations where they have to mouth things that make them feel like they've violated their conscience. A belief that race is as pervasive as God and explains everything looks and smells like a religion and a lot of people don't want to be forced to acknowledge it.
So to that extent, SGT has a point. But of course you're right that Reason can and should complain about mandated Bible study without mentioning CRT. In fact they should specifically leave it out if people are going to say two wrongs makes a right.
My point and several others' point is the hypocrisy of treating woke religion so lightly for the last many years, then suddenly freaking out over one state doing something stupid which the courts will almost certainly shut down, as they are already doing to Louisiana.
That's my comparison to elephants and anthills.
That's the reason to get government out of schools, which used to be a libertarian thing, but which gets no mention here.
The worst thing about stuffing kids with religion is hat some might thin evolution a fraud; oh boo hoo, they won't be biologists. Even flat earthers only hurt themselves. Both will probably learn the truth when they grow up AND THERE WILL BE NO LONG TERM HARM.
Contrast that with irreversible transgender mutilation among children who are otherwise presumed to be incapable of making informed decisions about sex, smoking, drinking, drugs, and guns.
One is far more dangerous to society and children than the other. To concentrate on the less dangerous one, which is on a much smaller scale, is hypocrisy.
woke religion
It's not a religion.
It's a cult. It's arguable that it is religious in nature.
What is the distinction between religion and ideology?
If I took the supernatural out of the equation but taught the remainder of the Gospels in class, would would that pass the "not a religion" test?
I would say yes, but, as I said above, conservative Christians would never tolerate that.
It would be hypocrisy if Reason had treated woke religion lightly. But that’s just not an accurate accusation. Some links below (one per post to get past the comment screen.)
https://reason.com/2024/10/16/dei-new-york-times-michigan-university-students/
"University of Michigan Spent $250 Million on DEI, Made Students Unhappier"
https://reason.com/2024/10/10/fema-should-stick-to-disaster-recovery-and-quit-social-engineering/
"FEMA Should Stick to Disaster Recovery and Quit Social Engineering"
https://reason.com/2024/06/04/harvard-to-stop-requiring-dei-statements-for-many-faculty-positions/
"Harvard To Stop Requiring DEI Statements for Many Faculty Positions"
https://reason.com/2024/04/17/nprs-uri-berliner-has-shown-that-dei-is-about-punishing-heresy/
"NPR's Uri Berliner Has Shown That DEI Is About Punishing Heresy"
https://reason.com/2024/01/06/the-conformity-gauntlet/
"Universities Use DEI Statements To Enforce Groupthink"
https://reason.com/2023/07/06/this-80-year-old-supreme-court-case-offers-hope-for-teachers-who-think-dei-has-gone-too-far/
"This 80-Year-Old Supreme Court Case Offers Hope for Teachers Who Think DEI Has Gone Too Far"
https://reason.com/podcast/2024/10/30/musa-al-gharbi-how-woke-elites-became-out-of-touch/
"Musa al-Gharbi: How Woke Elites Became Out of Touch"
https://reason.com/2024/10/01/corey-deangelis-school-choice-gay-cancel-culture/
"The Firing of School Choice Advocate Corey DeAngelis Is Classic Cancel Culture"
https://reason.com/podcast/2024/09/19/erika-sanzi-what-are-schools-really-teaching/
"Erika Sanzi: What Are Schools Really Teaching?"
https://reason.com/podcast/2024/08/14/charles-gasparino-woke-hypocrisy-is-hurting-businesses/
"Charles Gasparino: 'Woke' Hypocrisy Is Hurting Businesses"
Sarc is right in this context. The Reason comment board standard is, apparently:
– If an issue makes Team Blue look bad, Reason should write an article condemning Team Blue.
– If an issue makes Team Red look bad, Reason should write an article that gently castigates Team Red, while pointing out how Team Blue is still worse.
– No article that criticizes Team Red alone shall ever be written.
I also guarantee that in the comments to those articles that you linked above, there isn't a single one that said "oh yeah, Reason? Why aren't you talking about the Christian fundamentalists indoctrinating kids in Oklahoma? Huh????"
The article you are commenting on seems to violate your third rule. It's only in the comment section that the whataboutism is strong.
Shocking that the Christians of Oklahoma feel the typical public school teacher is qualified to teach the kids about their religion. I've had one ordained pastor of a large church tell me that discussion of Heaven and Hell was "above his pay grade." I can just imagine what Suzy Teacherunion has to say about it.
How is that guy a pastor? The proper answer to that is to say ultimate judgement is God's domain. That sounds like the guy just wants to avoid any accountability for being a shepherd to his flock and following scripture.
I'm not even religious, but I hate people who claim the label of a religion they refuse to actually follow. My respect for the devout does not extend to grifters and snakes.
Teaching about the Bible and teaching religion are two different things. No, I don't expect public school teachers to understand that.
These people in Oklahoma don't want to teach 'about' the bible. They want to proselytize and, if not convert kids, make the kids who do not share their particular brand of Christianity so uncomfortable that their parents take them out of school. That way, they can turn public school kids into 'Good Christians'.
I agree. It's the Christians who make it impossible to teach about the Bible in public schools, because they would not tolerate a scholarly presentation.
Yes. A literary study is going to examine the motives of the author for including particular passages and leaving out others, point out how different narrators see the same events in different ways, give some background about when the versions we currently read were finalized, and possibly ask students to write criticisms or identify weaknesses.
Not gonna fly.
Welcome to Oklahoma – We do edyookashun proper like. Boomer!! Sooner!!
A brief history lesson, as much for me as for thee: Among the women murdered by the witch hunters of Salem, Mass., was one who flouted the local compulsory church attendance statute. [I've always wondered why church attendance would ever need to be compulsory if it's so good for you--eating fresh, ripe fruit has never been compulsory in my lifetime.] What does religious freedom even mean if children of any or no faith aren't free from the compulsory religious teaching of others? Ya'll really hate Sharia law, right? So why use it as a template for Southern Baptist law?
You can tell he's an intern. Poor sentence structure, lots of baiting, and disregard of logic. Nowhere does Kevin say "Nay' or "YaY" for religious freedom but he does say "taxpayer funded" (does he want religous groups funding it !!!) and puts a shade on Biblical (of course he lowercases,how juvenille) study in schools
As I was saying to someone just today, you cannot argue with someone who won't show their first principles -- or who maybe has none
There is not a binary choice between DEI and Christianity in schools.
Pure anti-Libertarianism from our intern: Does he live in Oklahoma?I bet he doesn't.Does he think the big bad Feds should step in to force them to do or not do whatever? Of course he does. So what is even remotely Libertarian about our intern.