Milei Shuts Down Argentina's Tax Agency
AFIP is an "unnecessary bureaucracy" that stifles economic freedom, says Milei's government.

Argentine President Javier Milei announced plans to shut down the country's tax collection agency, a bold step in his ongoing effort to slash government spending and bureaucracy.
On Monday, presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni confirmed that the Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos (AFIP), Argentina's tax bureau, will "cease to exist." It will be replaced by a newly formed agency, the Agencia de Recaudación y Control Aduanero (ARCA), which will assume some of its functions.
"Throughout its existence, this agency has functioned as a political cash box and, as we all know, many Argentines have been subjected to absolutely immoral persecutions," Adorni's statement reads. "No State bureaucrat should be delegated the power to tell an Argentinean what to do with his property."
The closure of AFIP is framed as "essential to dismantle the unnecessary bureaucracy that has hindered the economic and commercial freedom of Argentines." ARCA, the new agency, will embody a "simple, more efficient, less costly, and less bureaucratic" approach to tax collection and customs control.
ARCA "aims to reduce the State, eliminate unnecessary positions, professionalize the agency, dismantle corrupt networks, and improve the efficiency of revenue collection and customs control by removing privileges of the past and optimizing public management," the statement continues.
According to Bloomberg Línea, 80 percent of AFIP's 2024 budget was allocated for salary payments. With the restructuring, a significant reduction in staff is anticipated, including the termination of over 3,000 AFIP agents who were "irregularly hired" by the previous administration.
The changes will also slash "higher-level positions by 45 percent and lower-level positions by 30 percent," while also reducing senior officials' salaries. Overall, the measures are expected to "result in budgetary savings of around [6.4 million dollars] per year," the statement added.
The overhaul is a cornerstone of Milei's broader strategy to curtail Argentina's fiscal deficit and shrink the size of its government, which he blames for fueling the country's crippling inflation. Since taking office in December, Milei has implemented a series of dramatic reforms, including cutting state subsidies, devaluing the currency, and closing several other state-run institutions.
In one of his early proposals, Milei introduced a 351-page bill containing 644 articles aimed at simplifying, digitalizing, and de-bureaucratizing government processes. The bill sought "to promote transparency and due administrative process…to obtain efficient regulations for market competitiveness, job creation, and everything that contributes to raising the standard of living of citizens."
Dissolving AFIP is one more step in that direction.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can’t we hire this guy?
OK, but what he's trying to do is reduce the amount of statism in Argentina to what we have in the USA. The reason he sounds so radical is because they have so much more statism in Argentina.
According to data I found on the intertubes, Argentina spent ~37% of it's GDP on government and the USA spent ~34%. Not a huge difference. Interested in other metrics you may be aware of.
Is that federal only, or does it include state and local?
Government debt in the USA is over 100% of GDP but it's only 50% in Argentina. The preamble of the Argentina Constitution says that the country exists for the benefit of all those who wish to dwell there rather than for the benefit of citizens. You can stay there as long as you want without worrying about the government deporting you.
He's got my vote
"Can’t we hire this guy?"
Right? I've loved reading about what he's done, and in only a few months! Pretty soon we'll start seeing the results and, even though the short term will be chaotic and difficult, I hope they see it through. The success of such a radical change in governing approach could lead to imitation. We can only hope.
Why? 6.4 million dollars was the punchline. That’s the equivalent of a toilet over here.
"U.S. TO IMPORT FREEDOM FROM ARGENTINA"
It's on Substack so it must be true?
https://open.substack.com/pub/michael796/p/us-to-import-freedom-from-argentina substack
You gotta give credit to Milei, he's at least trying to be the guy he ran as.
Could you imagine if a President tried this with the IRS? Wall to wall coverage on MSNBC about the end of America.
I'm actually shocked the mad lad did something that dramatic. The FVEYs are going to shove a color revolution up his ass if he doesn't watch out.
I am actually worried for his safety.
I actually really dig this approach. The whole "Repeal and Replace".
Hey FBI? Fuck you, we are shutting the doors. We are replacing you with the US Investigation Bureau, USIB. And if you would like, all of you are welcome to interview for a position in the new entity, though it will employ about 1/10th the people. Good luck and may fortune ever be in your favor.
So, "Federal Administration of Public Revenues" changes to "Customs Collection and Control Agency". Are they going to run the country on customs duties?
Argentina has high export taxes that farmers pay when they sell beef.
“Throughout its existence, this agency has functioned as a political cash box and, as we all know, many Argentines have been subjected to absolutely immoral persecutions,” Adorni’s statement reads. “No State bureaucrat should be delegated the power to tell an Argentinean what to do with his property.”
Sounds really familiar.
End the IRS instead of what Biden-Harris did by adding more staff.
The US can't totally eliminate the IRS, but it could reduce it significantly by employing a national sales tax instead of an income tax.
Plus, the taxpayers' privacy would be more protected, and the Treasury's coffers would be filling up faster.
The US doesn't need 87,000-armed tax agents looking over our shoulders.
Consumption taxes DO NOT preserve privacy, since anything you do which generates income comes under their purview. This is why so many jurisdictions monitor yard sales and flea markets.
If you limit consumption taxes to retail sales, then you need more nosiness as to who is buying from whom. If it’s not retail when a steel company buys iron ore, is it retail when they buy computers for their workers? Is it retail when a railroad buys steel rails?
The tax rate required to match current spending (40% of GDP) is way too high to be supported. Most EU VAT rates are above 20%, and they still have to add other taxes.
No one’s going to accept paying 25% tax on cars, and houses are right out. And as soon as you start exempting those big ticket items, you jack the rate up on what's left.
But of course, the answer is to NOT support current spending levels.
Fine with me. But no one ever mentions that. They just claim switching to some other alternate tax would be fairer or more efficient or some such. Sure, the IRS is inefficient. But more or less efficient compared to the sales tax bureau? No one ever discusses that.
For an example of one simple thing which most people never consider: Almost all prices incur fractional sales taxes, and almost all stores round up taxes because the customers are going to pay it one way or another. Now I had originally thought that governments don't really care. Just show us how much you sold last month, pay us 7.5%.
But that's not the case. Some, possibly all, governments say if the receipt shows 28 cents of tax was charged, they want all 28 cents, even if the individual items, added fractionally, would only come to 26.5 cents.
In other words, all those tax collectors insist on the right to look at every single receipt. I doubt they do, but it's just another example of government holding a hammer over everyone's head with the very explicit threat that they can bring it down at any time for any reason.
There didn't used to be sales taxes on homes. Then some cities added a 1% tax, which grew to a 2% tax, which in a few places is now a 3% tax. They don't always call it a sales tax, they call it transfer tax, or even a transfer fee if the local state construction forbids news taxes without a vote. This isn't a tax, it is a 3% dick in the ass.
Just the tip.
When we bought our first house back in 2017, we used a portion of a 401K for the down payment. We were completely mislead by the company holding it as to the penalties. They claimed the taxes were already factored in. And they never sent the appropriate tax forms to be filed afterwards, anyway.
I’m not looking for anything like that because my naive ass thinks I should be getting a tax break on it. Long story short, IRS hits us the next year for $8000 we didn’t have, all for luxury of using our own savings to buy a house. Up til then I only knew the comptrollers and IRS were evil in theory.
87k useless eaters.
“it could reduce it significantly by employing a national sales tax”
I favor the opposite approach. Because sales taxes are regressive and make it harder to rise out of poverty, I think a flat tax on income would be the better solution. No exemptions, a minimum amount before the tax kicks in, and no differentiation between earned and unearned income. The investor class (which, FWIW, is me) has gotten a sweet deal but it hurts those who live off paychecks.
Sales taxes are only regressive on necessities like groceries and clothing but those are untaxed in many states. Rich people pay sales tax on luxuries like cars and boats but poor people don't pay taxes because they don't buy luxuries.
That's not what a regressive tax is.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regressivetax.asp
"A regressive tax is one in which low-income owners pay a larger percentage of income than middle- and high-income earners. The tax burden decreases with regressive taxes as income rises. This is in contrast to a progressive tax that takes a larger percentage from high-income earners.
Common forms of regressive tax include sales tax, excise tax, and payroll tax."
I'm just curious if they have enough other employment in the country for all these people he is firing to have jobs.
Food trucks!
About 27 million people in Argentina are poor and 15% of those are mired in “destitution,” meaning they cannot adequately cover their food needs, according to the study released over the weekend.
The UCA’s social debt observatory is considered an independent and prestigious research space whose reports on poverty cover a larger geographical area than those conducted by Argentina’s national statistics agency, INDEC. It also applies a methodology that addresses the problem with a more multidimensional approach and its findings are seldom questioned by politicians and economists.
According to the center’s latest report, the increase in poverty levels in January was partly due to the devaluation of the Argentine peso applied by the Milei government shortly after taking office on Dec. 10. This resulted in an increase in the price of the country's basic basket — which includes food, services and non-food goods — and the basic food basket.
About 27 million people in Argentina are poor and 15% of those are mired in “destitution,” meaning they cannot adequately cover their food needs, according to the study released over the weekend.
So what you're saying is that your side decimated the country's economy so badly that it's going to take Milei several years to dig them out of it?
I didn't hear a "side" in her post. Presenting basic facts is just that. Everyone knows there will be upheaval in the short term, and price spikes shouldn't surprise anyone. If they see it through, those will ease as they shift from the more corrupt system to the new one.
She didn't present "facts". Anything named "social debt observatory" ran by a Catholic university is a political machine drive by leftists.
No, that isn't stereotyping at all.
Do you have anything to back up your accusation of bias? Or, as usual, did you pull it out if your ass?
The UCA’s social debt observatory is considered an independent and prestigious research space...
By whom? The UCA?
That's baloney!, the Argentine Peso had already been devaluated by the previous administration. The official exchange rate was 1/3 of the actual exchange rate a.k.a "blue dollar" in Dec when Milei took office. All he did was bring the official exchange rate to what the real one was. Learn your facts and stop spreading misinformation, also for your info poverty was already at nearly 50% before he even became president so trying to pin it on him is just bs. It's zoocialism that ruined Argentina, not Milei.
If DAP couldn't lie, she'd have nothing to post.
I didn't read her post as saying that Milei caused the poverty. Quite the opposite, I think. Argentina had a large segment of their population living in poverty before Milei took over.
Employed as 'armed-theft' robbers?
THAT career ending would be a plus even if it caused higher unemployment.
good for him. taxation is theft.
In fairness, Argentina still has taxes and will still have an agency to collect them. All Milei really did was fire the current crop of thieves and replace them with a hopefully-less-corrupt set of thieves.
cool. taxation remains theft and efforts to lessen corruption abound.
It wouldn’t be theft if “taxes” were collected as a voluntary fee in exchange for getting to vote in Our Democracy (TM) – it’s never been clear to me why “destitute” Americans should have an equal vote to confiscate my earnings for their own unearned support.
I mean of course ... but I suppose "America" can also mean the right to not earn a living and not contribute to paying off 17% of the debt with our tax revenues and still get to vote
A *Constitutional* USA never enumerated any Gov-Gun power for wealth distribution.
The lawless D.C. is where everything needs to be fixed.
This is the way. We need 535 guys like him in congress.
If anything goes wrong there will be entire libraries of new books written on the dangers of Libertarianism. Along side such volumes as, "Yes people starve to death under socialism, and why that is a good thing."
It's a sad day in American history when the United States is behind Argentina in the field of liberty ...
Milei 2024!
Can any bureaucracy really be unnecessary?
"No State bureaucrat should be delegated the power to tell an Argentinean what to do with his property."
Sounds like a fascist to me.
No joke. That's how bad the left self-projects.
"Elect Hitler II for MORE [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] but your guys are the Nazi's!"