British Man Convicted of Criminal Charges for Praying Silently Near Abortion Clinic
British law allows local governments to enact absurdly censorious orders limiting "anti-social" behavior.

In Britain, it can be a crime to think the wrong thoughts in the wrong place. It sounds absurd—not to mention Orwellian—but a handful of people have been arrested or charged in the country simply for praying silently near abortion clinics.
This month, a British man was convicted of criminal charges for praying silently near an abortion clinic. The man, Adam Smith-Connor did not attempt to harass, intimidate, or interact in any way with those entering the clinic. Instead, he wordlessly prayed with his head bowed slightly. He wasn't even on clinic property—he was outside the sightline of the clinic itself, according to the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a religious freedom group.
As a result, Smith-Connor was questioned by police and later charged with violating a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO), a broad censorship order enabled by the 2014 Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act. Under this law, local authorities can obtain special status for some public places, allowing them to ban a huge range of conduct. In the name of limiting "anti-social behavior," British towns have obtained PSPOs to ban the homeless from sleeping outside or to ban swearing.
Several cities have used this law to place "buffer zones" around local abortion clinics. The PSPO in Smith-Connor's case not only banned "intimidating or harassing" those working at or seeking services from the clinic but also barred individuals from engaging in "prayer," "[sprinkling] holy water on the ground," and "[crossing] themselves."
Smith-Connor violated this order in November 2022. He was convicted, and sentenced earlier this month to a "conditional discharge"—similar to probation—and ordered to pay approximately $11,709 in prosecution fees, according to the ADF.
The court's reasoning betrayed the absurdly censorious nature of the local law. "In its decision, the court reasoned that his prayer amounted to 'disapproval of abortion' because at one point his head was seen slightly bowed and his hands were clasped," according to the ADF.
"He was capable of being seen, he was engaged in prayer and it would have been perceptible to an observer," said Judge Orla Austin, The Telegraph reported. "He said he would not be looking at anyone so he could not breach their privacy but I find his presence and the circumstances could cause detrimental impact."
Smith-Connor is far from the first Briton to face legal consequences for silent prayer near an abortion clinic. In 2022, a woman in Birmingham, England was arrested for praying silently outside an abortion clinic. That same year, a priest was criminally charged for holding a sign reading "Praying for Freedom of Speech" near an abortion clinic, even though his sign had nothing to do with abortion rights.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tampon Tim gizzed his panties when he saw this verdict.
And then probably listed them on buymypanties.com.
British towns have obtained PSPOs to ban the homeless from sleeping outside
So, the law's not all bad.
This is what you get when you do not have constitutionally enumerated rights.
Instead, they have Parliamentary Supremacy. That means the British Parliament can do whatever it wants. Any rights the British People have are simply by the grace of Parliament. I prefer our Bill of Rights, rather the grace of Congress or any State legislature.
"British Man Convicted of Criminal Charges for Praying Silently Near Abortion Clinic. British law allows local governments to enact absurdly censorious orders limiting "anti-social" behavior."
1. Napoleon couldn't conquer Great Britain.
Hitler couldn't conquer Great Britain.
Stalin couldn't conquer Great Britain.
Instead, the leftist vermin there has turned the once proud and free island into a politically correct gulag.
2. Aren't you glad we won our independence from those hypersensitive sissies in GB?
The tree of liberty needs refreshing from time to time.
At this point Nauru could conquer Great Britain.
Maybe recently, but England has been conquered so many times in its history that it's largely bred a population that is used to be lorded over (literally).
It's why they have no rights. They are an occupied people. The only difference now that instead of Norman feudal lords, it's "elites"
And that's actually been true for a while. It's one of the reasons they had an empire in the first place, they had millions of men that could be forced into their armies and navies with little or no opposition or consequences if their lives were lost. (Not unlike Russia in that regard)
Not unlike most of the world, I think.
Point of order - Islam did conquer Great Britain.
Just saying, in case that might be related.
The British government is fucking evil.
Or a goal to obtain if you're Jeff.
True.
Just ask the Irish.
He was also behind a tree when he prayed. The fine for the "offense" is 1k, town spent 90k enforcing it.
He should have said he just dosed off.
No
If only someone had written a novel warning us - - - - - - - - -
To be fair, when Orwell conceived of INGSOC, there's no way he could have thought it would apply to English Socialists.
Cs Lewis that hediois strength
How will the British state protect people from those who pray secretly though?
Who knew that freedom of speech would need to extend to not saying fuck all?
"All Public Spaces are Public, Except Some Public Spaces are Less Public"
Napoleon the Pig
No constitution in England
No 1st amendment
The whining is amazing
People who want to control others constantly complaining
Totally. These assholes wanna control what other people think silently to themselves.
Oh, that’s not what you’re talking about, is it?
Idiot.
“The court’s reasoning betrayed the absurdly censorious nature of the local law. “In its decision, the court reasoned that his prayer amounted to ‘disapproval of abortion’ because at one point his head was seen slightly bowed and his hands were clasped,””
Progressive 1st Commandment: “Thou shalt not blaspheme against the most holy sacrament of abortion, even in your heart.”
The abortion clinic is their holy church.
Citing the Alliance Defending Freedom as a source? Isn’t that a hate crime in progressive circles?
but I find his presence and the circumstances could cause detrimental impact.
Democrats rapidly taking notes.
Whatever happened to Speaker's Corner ?
Has anyone been imprisoned for recalling Stanley Kubrick's oracular depiction of the Labour Establishment turning into an social control cult in A Clockwork Orange ?