University of Maryland Sued for Canceling Student 'Expressive Activity' on October 7
The university caved to pressure to target pro-Palestine events.

The University of Maryland is now facing a lawsuit after unilaterally canceling all student expressive activities planned for October 7. The move came after the university received "numerous calls" expressing outrage over events organized by campus pro-Palestine groups to mark the anniversary of Hamas' massacre of more than 1,000 Israeli civilians last year.
"Given the overwhelming outreach, from multiple perspectives, I requested a routine and targeted safety assessment for this day to understand the risks and safety measures associated with planned events," University of Maryland President Darryll J. Pines wrote in a statement earlier this month. While Pines noted that there was "no immediate or active threat," he still decided to "host only university-sponsored events that promote reflection on this day," with all other "expressive events" canceled.
But Pines' decision hardly had the effect of suppressing dissent. Less than two weeks after his announcement, the University of Maryland Students for Justice in Palestine (UMD-SJP) chapter filed a lawsuit against the university, arguing that Pines' cancellation of all student expressive activities on October 7 would be an obvious violation of their First Amendment rights.
"On one day next month, no student-selected speakers will be allowed to present at any of the [University System of Maryland] campuses, serving more than 150,000 students—a prior restraint so sweeping only a cataclysm could justify it," the lawsuit reads. "The First Amendment does not allow campus officials to establish free expression-black-out days, even on occasions that may be emotional or politically polarizing."
According to the suit, UMD-SJP had sought to make a reservation in July to use a university green space to "hold a vigil commemorating the thousands of lives lost since the initiation of Israel's current attack on Gaza." However, during a meeting on August 19, the university's president and vice president told the group that they "had been receiving pressure from groups inside and outside of the University to cancel UMD-SJP's reservation, but that they were committed to protecting the free speech of students," according to the suit.
After that meeting, calls to suppress student speech increased, including an online petition with more than 27,000 signatures that argued that allowing UMD-SJP's event to go forward would be like "granting permission to white supremacists to burn a cross on campus on the day commemorating the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr." By September 1, the administration's expression-protecting stance had eroded, and Pines announced that all expressive activities would be banned for the day.
In an amicus brief in support of the lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and the Knight Foundation pointed out how absurd Pines' attempt to stifle all student speech for one day is.
"The University cannot seriously purport to ban every single expressive event that might take place throughout the University of Maryland system on that day: every concert, dance, play, poetry reading, art exhibition, debate, fundraiser, club meeting, protest, etc. taking place across its campuses—even for a single day," the brief reads. "Such a ban would be impossible to enforce and would amount practically to a total shutdown of the university's core functions. Plainly, the University means to restrict expressive events about Israel and Palestine on October 7, and will enforce its ban on "expressive events" with that priority, on those contents, in mind."
"That the University's censorship applies to a single, uniquely resonant day only highlights the problem," the brief continues. "By silencing speech at its most salient moment, the restriction directly contravenes the public interest in robust, uninhibited debate. Blessing such a restriction would get the First Amendment precisely backwards."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Such a ban would be impossible to enforce and would amount practically to a total shutdown of the university's core functions.
Teaching?
ps
Go Terps!
"Teaching?"
Social indoctrination via federal grants.
Teaching, education... pfffft.
.
Potatoe - Potatoe
College Park has a substantial Jewish student body and presence (iirc, their student union is on-campus), so it is not a surprise this free speech activity is being cancelled.
If the raghead cancers are anything like the ones at ucla, their "protest" includes keeping jews from attending class and threatening them
I suspect that the University of Maryland Students for Justice in Palestine considers beating up any Jew they find to be free speech.
It would be funny if they got the shit kicked out of them by the Jewish kids.
Your speech is violence, their violence is speech.
Let the protests happen. All attendees will receive a free pager.
Mostly peaceful expressive activities.
Should have just given all the mostly peaceful attendees free pagers.
Funny how the left wets their pants when THEIR speech is restricted but rejoices whenever they stop conservative speech on campus.
Rights for me but not for thee.
They could just intensely apply the rules on them.
Instead of letting their freak flags fly.
A protest on Oct 7th gets called "pro-Palestine" instead of "anti-Israel"?
Universities are backed into a corner on this stuff. Theoretically, free-speech absolutism sounds good, but a university would be destroyed if they tried it.
The online petition isn't wrong. It WOULD be like "granting permission to white supremacists to burn a cross on campus on the day commemorating the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr". They would just have to call it a "pro-Caucasian" event.
How about a Back-the-Badge group having a pro-police event commemorating the Rodney King beating in LA?
If a university allowed either of those, we all know that violent riots would destroy the campus.
It might look like when a university sportsball team wins a championship.
The online petition isn’t wrong. It WOULD be like “granting permission to white supremacists to burn a cross on campus on the day commemorating the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr”.
The problem is that so-called 'hate speech' rules enable some hate speech while silencing other 'hate speech' and the establishment is caught between those nonsense categories.
For example, the Ku Klux Klan would not be allowed to hold such a rally because of 'hate speech' but terrorists are allowed to hold their rallies despite calling for the extermination of Jews. Pretty sure the KKK likes black people more than Palestinians like Jews, which is scary if you think about it.
It boils down to the state is quite happy to let people they agree with engage in 'hate speech'. It isn't 'free speech absolutism' that's the problem.
True. I should have been clearer. Through decades of highly selective support of "free-ish" speech, universities built the walls and painted the floor that created the corner they are now stuck in.
Pretty sure the KKK likes black people more than Palestinians like Jews, which is scary if you think about it.
From a different vantage point, where maybe someone grew up with more overt racism or otherwise objectively rejected the last 50+ yrs. constant of "RAYCISS!!!" brainwashing, this is normal or obvious rather than scary.
There is no Constitutional guarantee that students will get to organize events on campus, public property or, especially, private property. There is no Constitutional guarantee that ANYONE can organize events except on private property with the permission of the owner of the property. You are guaranteed the right to peaceably assemble but that guarantee does not include a particular time or place. You are guaranteed the right to freely associate and to hold and express your opinions, but no guarantee that anyone else will want to associate with you or hear your opinions. Institutions of higher learning should not stifle opinions, especially unfavored opinions but not favored ones, but unless they are governmental agencies, they should be free to do so. It would be interesting to see what the basis for the lawsuit is. If the university is under no contractual or legal obligation to provide students with a venue for their protest, what is the cause of action?
Let the proto-terrorists speak. It is actually better to let the retardation be on full display.
Not really clear to me what constitutes an "expressive event" here. Emma and the ACLU would have us believe that the planned event was no different than ordinary student activities. But apparently the university had scheduled events for that particular day and this group sought to reserve a space which would have put the university in the position of officially sanctioning their event. The article does not mention any other student groups that may have attempted to reserve university property on that day. I assume that these students would be free to gather anywhere on campus and chant about the river to the sea. Nothing described here prevents that. The decision only says that the university will only devote resources to to university sponsored events. I don't see a problem with that.
If you really want to help the Palestinian cause, go there.
Wearing your LGBT pride colors.
Rooftop parties are big in Gaza. Or at least they were, when they had rooftops.
You know what, I had a whole thing I was going to say here – but honestly, I’m over it.
Let them have their Nazi rally. They’ll all be in one place. And they like jihadis so much, they probably won’t pay any mind to the guy who walks in with a backpack that he leaves in a place that’ll achieve maximum effect. These tent-living hobgoblins won’t even notice until it does the very thing they’re there supporting.
Make Hamas real for them. They clearly want it.
Why does "expressive activity" sound like something toddlers do in daycare and not something adults in institutions of higher learning should be doing?
Student free speech is ,yes, an important tradition.
Having objected to restrictions on speech I've agreed with over the years, I'm forced of course to also stand up for these people, even though their cause is bullshit.
I wholeheartedly endorse their right to free expression. I also think they should not be given any special protection.
Speech is an awesome right and an awesome responsibility. If they find that their provocation gets their a$$es kicked it may be a valuable life lesson.
I have a very different view of this. Universities do not exist for protest and political activism. Universities exist for research, education, and real learning. Protests and political activism disrupt the underlying function and purpose of universities and rob the students who are there to study and learn of the very experience they are paying for. In other words, allowing this nonsense is, in fact, a total breach of contract with both the majority of the student body and the taxpayers who fund the institution. These are academic institutions, and the appropriate place for students to engage with these ideas is in classroom discussions and their papers. You know, because that's why they are there. The universities aren't caving to the demand that these be canceled. Instead, they've stopped caving to the demand that a small minority of students be able to disrupt the universities' actual mission and the academic experience of the majority of students who are there to actually study and learn rather than scream with ignorant, impotent rage because they think they already know everything they need to know. If they want to protest, they can take it off campus.