The Cutting Edge
Plus: The Federal Reserve cut interest rates, Congress still isn't cutting spending, and more....

The Federal Reserve on Wednesday cut its short-term interest rate for the first time in four years—a sign that the central bank no longer views inflation as the economy's primary challenge.
The Fed's Open Market Committee approved a cut of 50 basis points (a 0.5 percent reduction in interest rates). In a statement, the committee said that the move was made due to "greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2 percent, and judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance."
"After four years of upheaval, the U.S. now seems to have low inflation, low unemployment, and solid economic growth," concluded The Wall Street Journal's Greg Ip, who applauded the Fed's move. The stock market seemed similarly pleased by the change.
The rate cut should mean some relief for consumers looking to make big purchases. Rates for mortgages, car loans, and other forms of borrowing are determined, in part, by the Fed's target rates. Lower mortgage rates could indirectly help bring more supply to the housing market, which is good news for prospective buyers, The Washington Post reported.
With unemployment ticking upward in recent months—it has been at least 4 percent since May—an interest rate cut could also be viewed as the Federal Reserve pivoting away from a sole focus on getting inflation under control. After all, the Fed has a dual mandate to keep both inflation and unemployment low. But Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell seemed to downplay that in his remarks on Wednesday, saying that the job market is "in solid condition. And our intention with our policy move today is to keep it there."
Claiming credit? President Joe Biden (remember him?) is "is set to declare on Thursday that the economy has finally reached a turning point he has long sought," reports The New York Times. It's a turning point that may have arrived sooner if Biden's policies hadn't contributed to the recent period of inflation.
On the flip side, former President Donald Trump appears likely to cast the Fed's move as a worrying sign of a wobbling recovery—or as part of a conspiracy against him, naturally. "To cut it by that much, assuming they're not just playing politics, the economy would be very bad," Trump said Wednesday, according to Reuters.
No cuts here. The House of Representatives voted Wednesday to block a bill that would avert a government shutdown when the fiscal year ends on September 30.
Like in every other year, Congress has to pass a new budget (or a continuing resolution) by the dawn of the new fiscal year on October 1. And just like happens in almost every year, lawmakers have failed to do that. The razor-thin Republican majority in the House means that Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) has to keep his entire caucus in line—yes, it's okay to laugh—or get bipartisan support for any spending bill.
In this case, he got neither. Democrats nearly unanimously opposed the continuing resolution that would have funded the government through March 28, and 14 Republicans voted "no" for good measure. The main objection to the bill had nothing to do with the federal budget and was mostly about language that would require proof of citizenship as part of voter registration processes in the states. However, existing federal laws already prohibit noncitizens from voting, and despite claims made by former President Donald Trump (and others), election data show that noncitizens are not committing rampant voter fraud.
Wait, why is Congress putting a hot-button election policy issue into a spending bill? Good question! That's the real story here, and one that reveals a major reason why Congress can't seem to budget well.
Regardless of whether you view the voting measure as essential or silly and redundant, it should obviously pass or fail on its own. Bundling it into the continuing resolution was meant to tempt right-wing Republicans into voting for the bill, even though they want to see spending cuts that were not included.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) laid out the "insincere and unserious" process during a speech on the House floor Wednesday. (He voted "present" on the continuing resolution.)
Today we will vote on a continuing resolution that will fund all of government in one bill and doesn't cut one penny.
I spoke on the House floor this morning to urge my colleagues not to participate in this unserious and insincere political theater. pic.twitter.com/ir0AaZSm4Y
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) September 18, 2024
Congress should stop playing games and start getting serious about budgeting better.
More explosions in Lebanon: Hezbollah militants in Lebanon were targeted in a second wave of attacks on Wednesday, as hand-held radios and walkie-talkies detonated. At least 20 were killed and more than 450 were injured, according to The New York Times.
Israel has not claimed credit for the attacks in Lebanon, but the Pentagon is reportedly preparing for a possible Israeli ground invasion of its northern neighbor. Yoav Gallant, Israel's defense minister, seemed to suggest as much on Wednesday. "The center of gravity is moving from Gaza to the north through the diversion of resources and forces," he said. "We are opening a new phase in the war."
Scenes from Virginia: Hung Cao, the Republican challenging two-term Sen. Tim Kaine (D–Va.) in the blue-ish state this November, is reportedly handing out some unusual campaign swag:
Sen. Rick Scott is hanging out with Va. GOP Senate nominee Hung Cao today. Polls show Ds looking pretty strong there
Cao says polls showing Harris up in Virginia are off, calls it a toss up state and says Northern Virginia is going to surprise people. And he's handing out these pic.twitter.com/p2CJhT5B2N
— Burgess Everett (@burgessev) September 11, 2024
Cao is running an unorthodox campaign, even by the too-online standards of the contemporary GOP. And he seems to struggle with geography. But at least he's got a sense of humor—and I'll admit to chuckling every time I see a "Farmers for Hung Cao" sign along the side of the road.
QUICK HITS
- The FBI believes Iranian hackers were behind the theft of emails from former President Donald Trump's campaign.
- Three things to know about Sean "Diddy" Comb's sex-trafficking indictment.
- While campaigning in New York on Wednesday, Trump proposed capping credit card interest rates at "around 10 percent." Worth noting: The president does not have the power to control credit card interest rates. And if such a law was passed, it would likely prevent low-income Americans from qualifying for credit cards, hurting the very people it is meant to help.
- New data suggest overdose deaths are finally on the decline.
- Shameless plug: Check out the latest episode of Reason's Why We Can't Have Nice Things podcast, which dropped this morning.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A few years ago, I ran into Kamala at a party. I occasionally halve my standards and will hook up with a 4 or a 5. And that is what happened that evening.
Here’s the thing though. In person, she’s ugly. Really ugly. In fact, she’s so ugly that when I was fucking her in the ass, I thought she was giving me a blowjob.
I later figured that out during the ass-to-mouth finale. Had to shower a few times afterwards - the amount of shit that comes out of her mouth was as much as from her butt and my dick wasn’t any cleaner. Hence the need for multiple showers.
Inside the beltway scoop: she loves it when you stuff the box. Erections matter.
Can’t be real. Kamalala is a 2 at best.
Unless you have a "weird" fetish for cackling and Venn diagrams.
And turkey necks.
Your completely plausible account only confirms what we already knew. Kamala exists only to bring joy to the world.
It was a costume party and I was dressed as Willie Brown. At the end of the escapade, I left with a brown willie.
...a sign that the central bank no longer views inflation as the economy's primary challenge.
Biden's going to win reelection!
Buttplug: "See? See? I told you Bidenomics works!"
Well, in a sense, he will. Kamala will be in charge just as much as Joe is.
“Biden’s going to win reelection!”
No way this is related to the election. Nope. Can't be. Not possible.
The House of Representatives voted Wednesday to block a bill that would avert a government shutdown when the fiscal year ends on September 30.
The fucking teases.
Regardless of whether you view the voting measure as essential or silly and redundant, it should obviously pass or fail on its own.
One giant omnibus bill a year that includes everything. Let's gooooo.
Hezbollah militants in Lebanon were targeted in a second wave of attacks on Wednesday, as hand-held radios and walkie-talkies detonated.
Genocide on free speech. Or maybe outdated tech.
What’s gonna blow up next? Vacuum tube radios? Black and white televisions?
Smoke signals.
Maybe next time, the government agents that did this will telegraph their next move beforehand.
Dangit, I always stick my Mr. Microphone in the wrong place...
are we still doing phrasing here?
Crystal sets.
Carrier pigeons.
[Fingers crossed in fervent hope of people getting derezzed by Laserdiscs]
Seriously, if this happens, I promise the fickle anachronistic future-history tech Gods that I won’t say another word about our current future lacking jetpacks.
It's the Middle East. Clay tablets.
Bad dates?
Every guy that goes to a hospital to be treated for pager and walkie talkie explosions is another name Mossad can add to its Iranian operator list.
> Every guy that goes to a hospital to be treated for pager and walkie talkie explosions is another name Mossad can add to its Iranian operator list.
Hmm. So, you know, for a fact then, that their communications devices were smart bombs and only exploded when held by verified Hezbollah militants?
Seems to me, while perhaps clever, this explosive delivery method is a bit indiscriminate. Sort of like how antipersonnel landmines don’t care who or what steps on them, I doubt these bomb-laced comms devices care who is holding them or near them when they are triggered.
Are you being an idiot deliberately?
1. Hezbollah passed them out to their operatives, because phones can be tracked, even flip phones, so just like dealers in the 90's they used pagers. And who the fuck is going to use a pager if they don't have to?
Do you think the wife and kids would play with Daddy's Hezbollah pager instead of a smartphone?
> Are you being an idiot deliberately?
Bwahahahahaa
> 1. Hezbollah passed them out to their operatives...
And you have the magical knowledge to know, for absolute fact, that only Hezbollah militants received these comms devices?
Wow. And you think I'm being an idiot?
On that note, anyone seen Misek today? Or is convalescing with his fellow Jihadis?
Paging Mr. Sinwar? Mr. Nasrallah? Dickweed Khamenei?
Mossad Agent Moti Rola is my fave meme so far.
I snickered at several of the ones with guesses at the final message on the pagers.
"Shalom, goat fucker"
Now they need to sabotage the goats.
...I'll admit to chuckling every time I see a "Farmers for Hung Cao" sign along the side of the road.
Bull.
Well, it sure isn’t an ox.
Nobody has a beef with that.
That pin slogan, "I want my senator to be Hung", works on at least three different level levels.
Can you clarify? Asking for a Presidential candidate. Maybe both.
“I want my senator to be Hung” like a horse.
“I want my senator to be Hung” by the neck.
“I want my senator to be Hung” Cao.
Mid thigh, knee, ankleFarm animal, neck, person. Of course.
He should have changed his name to ‘Well Hung Cao’, to pull the childless cat lady vote.
With my two, there’s only one meaning that counts, and it has something to do with a tall tree.
"See! The GOP is always trying to lynch someone!"
He would never steer you wrong.
Udder nonsense.
That’s bovinary thinking.
Nice.
The town drunk will try to milk that for a while.
Hung Cao is certainly not milquetoast.
"the U.S. now seems to have low inflation, low unemployment, and solid economic growth"
Serious question: If it ain't broke, why "fix" it (by cutting interest rates)?
Because they're lying about all 3 metrics.
Sure, except for the fact that unemployment is at 4%, inflation is at 2.3%, GDP is growing at over 2%, and the S&P is up almost 20% on the year.
Exactly which metric is bad?
As-if anyone needs to ask. 33% of the US population is out of work yet 4% unemployment (only accounts for 'willing' to work), GDP includes Gov-Spending which government doesn't yield any "Product" at all.
The more time that goes by the more Cooked-Books are being used. Only a downright moron follows the pitched 'Gov' Stats in contrast to basic math and un-related stats.
He doesn’t care. Nelson is a lying democrat propagandist who is here to push The Narrrative.
Wanting balanced budgets and sane fiscal policies doesn't make me a Democrat, nor does opposing the modern-day GOP with their cultural coercion and moral self-rightousness.
There's a word for someone who believes that the government should stay out of people's lives for anything that doesn't impact other people, while supporting free markets and fiscal responsibility. It's why I'm here.
Democrats want to tax a lot and spend more. Republicans want to not tax a lot, and still spend. Neither of them are responsible, neither of them are worthy of our trust in regards to our tax dollars, and none of them are looking out for my best interest.
Remember when the GOP stood for balanced budgets, fiscal responsibility, individual freedom, and smaller government? I miss those days.
Wanting balanced budgets and sane fiscal policies doesn’t make me a Democrat
Except you don’t want those things. You want to preach the good news of the Democrats for 50 cents a post.
nor does opposing the modern-day GOP with their cultural coercion and moral self-rightousness.
Let’s talk cultural coercion:
You’re gaslighting gay kids to think that they’re the wrong sex and get castrated.
You’re charging political opponents with novel “crimes” in order to fix an election.
You’re demanding speech censorship of people who disagree with you.
You’re collapsing economies based on the absolute worst case prognostications of climate hucksters.
You forced millions to inject themselves with an experiment or lose their jobs.
You’re telling millions of young children in schools that they’re evil by nature because slavery was once a thing.
It’s not that the modern-day GOP is self-righteous. It’s that you guys are evil.
Kamala needs all the help she can get.
Except that the economy is still in total ruin thanks to Biden. It’s all an elaborate lie by Democrats. They hide the truth, just like the election, and more recently in Springfield. Democrats in government lie, the media runs with it, and stupid people believe the lies. The truth is that the election was stolen by Democrats, Haitians are stealing and eating pets while Democrats deny it, and the economy is that of a third world nation because of Democrats. Everything is a plot by Democrats.
Now you’re getting it, tardo. Took you long enough to start believing your lying eyes.
Who has gotten the lion's share of the jobs under Biden-Harris: Citizens or non-citizens?
Citizens of course. Immigrants are all welfare leaches who don’t work, remember?
Hey more strawman arguments. Good work buddy. You're totally not a broken joke.
Literally no one here said that about legal immigrants but that won't stop Sarcasmic lying about it, because if he didn't he wouldn't have an argument at all.
Literally you, Jesse, and the rest of the retard brigade say exactly that everytime I say more immigrants should be allowed to work.
Cite one time?
Look. We are sorry you are too stupid and too dishonest to realize mass illegal immigration into a welfare state assumes a cost. Something you continue to deny in your ignorance.
We get it. You’re a retarded open borders Democrat.
Also the work permit is especially hilarious. 1.5m open jobs. 6M illegals. 2% of Pennsylvania illegals signed up when offered permits. Those on temporary visas like Haitians, who have permits, continue to have high unemployment rates.
It is almost like importing low skilled labor doesn’t magically create jobs at a 1 for 1 rate. But again. You’re too stupid to understand this.
Now that is a strawman, because I’ve never said immigration doesn’t come with a cost. Then you wrap it up with binary thinking, because anyone who isn’t on your team is defending the other team. Bravo.
Then you edit the post after I reply.
By the way, are you using... government numbers?
Aren't you the one who says only Democrats use government numbers because government numbers are all Democrat lies?
“Now that is a strawman”
No. No it isn’t, retard. I've never once seen you accede that mass illegal immigration has any downsides. But plenty of the opposite.
I have many times. The fact that you ignore the comments and won’t bookmark them doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Just makes you a liar, as always.
No. You haven't. Another lie.
Jesse: How dare you contradict my strawman! You're lying!
Now just full retard. Earlier than usual. Good work buddy.
They weren't bookmarked because they don't exist. They don’t exist because you're a fucking liar.
Provide a link and prove you're not a fucking liar... or better yet, tell us all right now what the actual costs of mass uncontrolled immigration are to Americans/
I'll bookmark that.
I have him muted but must be Sarc.
Ok Sarc, explain to me why an illegal border crosser is a citzen while someone has to wait years, get a lawyer, pay over 10k to become a citizen. Yes, I know people who have.
No-one is against legal immigration except you projecting your values on to others. Legal immigration is great because it allows a country to import skills they need or grow a population at a certain rate. Illegal immigrant those people who no ties to the country.
Counter: 2
Incorrectly used: 2
There is zero binary thinking in that post lol.
Look sarc. We get it. You prefer ignorance. TPS is an example of the policy you wany with work permits. They still have a high cost, negative. They don’t have full employment. This doesn’t matter to you. You believe in your ignorance that jobs magically appear as soon as someone crosses a border.
And yes. You constantly deny costs. How many times have you called CIS wrong and racist?
Even here your idiocy that if given work permits it would solve the issue despite having a subset of immigrants with work permits still producing a cost. This isn’t even considering cost shifts of immigrant workers pushing citizens to welfare.
None of your ideas are based on logic or facts. Pure feelings. Actual binary thinking that all immigration is good. You offer nothing.
You are disconnected from reality, bub.
Nuh uh screams sarc.
Sarc, usually when someone wants to formulate an intelligent argument they will find evidence to buttress their argument.
In your case those in TPS is an emulation of what you propose. That class of immigrants is high cost and doesn't have full employment despite having work permits.
Yet your argument is extending work permits to 6M illegals will solve the issue. Despite the subclass that falls into your argument refuting your beliefs.
It is amazing watching your cognitive bias in action.
When Jesse says “your argument” or “you propose” what follows is always a strawman concocted from his vivid imagination. Completely detached from reality.
How is it not your argument?
Please explain.
Binary thinking.
Give an example then, you lying little fuck. My brother and sister are immigrants to America, fuckhead.
And people complain that tax, regulation and insurance free illegals are taking jobs away because they are cheaper to employ than citizens. Never that they're "lazy".
Literally nobody here has ever argued that and I know you know that.
Oh wait, I get it. Your two little twisted brain cells are trying to equate people complaining that illegals are getting free food, housing, health, entertainment and $2k a month, as complaining that they're "lazy".
You're a real piece of work.
Even if they make the same pay they are cost beneficial to a company due to regulatory advantage, such as not being included in ACA regulations for tax purposes.
My brother and sister are immigrants to America, fuckhead.
I’ve got black friends, that proves I’m not racist!
Good for your brother and sister. If they're anything like you then this country is worse off with them here.
I’ve got black friends, that proves I’m not racist!
That actually does, wokie. Why would a person who hates someone for the color of their skin, be their friend.
Fucking retard.
You just have nothing but your demented crutch of conflating illegal and legal immigration, because you know that your actual stance is indefensible and motivated solely by your instinct to cover for the Democrats.
You’re such a loser scumbag. We’re all glad you’re a democrat, and not a real libertarian. As you make a great ambassador for the statists.
It would be nice if you could, for a change, answer the question asked and not just Kamala the answer.
Stupid, rhetorical questions get stupid, rhetorical answers.
You don’t have any real answers you stupid cunt.
Illegals aren’t immigrants you drunk bitch.
And government or private sector?
The economy's doing so great they have to do a massive rate cut two months before the election.
A half a percent is hardly "massive," nor is it a surprise because they've been talking about it for months.
Except they're talking about dropping it as low as 3.4% by the end of next year. This is going to send housing prices on another rocket ride.
A half percent rate cut IS a big cut dumbass.
Hey, would you like to have Trump call you every week and tell you how you are fucking up?
Again, sarc never defends democrats. He is an economics genius. Never accepts government manipulation as truth.
Listen to sarc. He is the head of the Ministry of Truth.
Binary thinking is binary.
And the counter starts here as you learned a new term yesterday. And already using it incorrectly.
Counter: 1
I’ve been using that term for years to describe retards like you, retard. Go ahead, count how many times you show that you don’t understand what it means, failed gaslighter.
LOL
What he just said was a twofer, right?
LOL.
LOL
You’ve never used it before. And you managed to fuck that up, and ‘gaslight’ too.
Drunk imbecile.
You’re a party shill, Sarckles. Just embrace it like Jeffy does.
Meanwhile, we have many store and restaurant chains filing for bankruptcy, a seeming slowdown in construction and construction services. Those may be lagging indicators, but it does not look like signs of an especially healthy economy.
Buy your Cheesy Poofs from Costco.
In the 55-gallon drum Jeffy Special size?
Not everyone has a home loading dock and forklift.
Jeffy got the government to pay for his forklift as a mobility device.
Here’s an old picture of Jeffy, before hi more recent weight gain.
https://www.google.com/imgres?q=stanley%20thornton%20adult%20baby&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi2-prod.mirror.co.uk%2Fincoming%2Farticle769203.ece%2FALTERNATES%2Fs1200b%2FStanley%2520Thronton%2520the%252031-year-old%2520baby&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mirror.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld-news%2Fthe-31-year-old-man-who-lives-as-an-adult-769289&docid=6aUcvIhRPRlBUM&tbnid=Obwj7iyDIoIVUM&vet=12ahUKEwjpnPnzx9CIAxUuADQIHb1PDGUQM3oECBcQAA..i&w=1200&h=900&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwjpnPnzx9CIAxUuADQIHb1PDGUQM3oECBcQAA
Can't be. Mom doesn't have a black eye.
With a straw!
Look. Who are you going to trust? Your eyes or a government who on a monthly basis is caught lying about economic indicators.
Every month new jobs numbers are touted, lauded by the media as proof of the great job the government is doing.
Then quietly a few weeks later those numbers almost always get adjusted down by 10, 15, 20%...
It's the sign of a changing economy. People's habits changed during the lockdowns, and what you're observing is, as you said, a lagging indicator. People don't go out as much anymore and buy more online. You're seeing the fallout from that.
Lol. Did Jen Psaki tell you this? It isn't the 20% increase in costs? It isn't the record debt? It isn't increasing rent and energy costs. It isn't record 401k loans or pull outs.
It is covid stopped people from eating out.
Fucking hilarious.
Do you deny that habits changed as a result of the lockdowns, or are you engaging in the fallacy of relative privation?
Are you denying that price has an impact on buying decisions?
Of course not.
I’m saying that when people were locked in their homes, and dining rooms were forced to be closed, people got out of the habit of eating out in restaurants.
I’m saying that when people were locked in their homes, and stores were forced to be closed, people got out of the habit of going to brick and mortar stores.
As a result of this restaurants and stores are closing. I'm not saying it's the sole factor, but I do think it's the main one.
Are you telling me that I’m wrong, or are you engaging in one of Jesse’s favorite fallacies?
No. I'm sure the government forbidding people from going to restaurants or non-mega corporation retail stores has an impact.
I'm ALSO saying that a major jump in prices (when grocery prices skyrocket, so do the prices of restaurants) is an equally massive cause of the problem.
Fair enough.
Address the comment dummy.
It didn’t change enough to contribute to the economic issues.
For example. Eating at home would save households money. Yet we have record credit card debt. Explain.
Fallacy it is.
But?
Lol. You make a retarded assertion then refuse to back it up.
Anecdotally, sure COVID kept me and mine from going out as much as we used to. But as soon as COVID-shutdowns were lifted, we went right back to our old habits, especially frequenting those places that had tried hard to stay open and/or that re-opened quickest, tipping a bit more generously in gratitude.
But when prices started jumping, decisions were made and we consciously avoided going out quite as much, and skipping favorite places in favor of cheaper seatings, or skipping the normal bar tab. By 2023, when prices started approaching 2x what they had been in early 2020, going out to eat pretty much came to a halt. I can honestly say that Mrs O and I have not been “out to eat” since June, and even that was only because it was our anniversary.
Anecdotally, almost everyone I know got into the habit of cooking more and buying stuff online, and it stuck.
Is this another of your illegal immigrant hunter bumper stickers stories?
Put it this way--I can go out and buy a New York Strip dinner for about $75 (or more). Or, I can buy a strip loin from Costco for $175, cut up about 10 or so, add a handful of veggies, and I've got ten dinners for about $20 each.
The math always wins. Shit, I can't even go to IHOP anymore without spending $60 for the family.
Construction industry is slowing down however this may just be your typical lull before a major election. About a month after the election people will say screw it we need these projects unless the present administration says lets do a ton of stupid shit before the inaguration
"Meanwhile, we have many store and restaurant chains filing for bankruptcy"
Thay's the sign of a health capitalist market. In a competitive business environment, businesses will fail on a regular basis as their competitors address customer needs and steal their market share.
If businesses aren't going bankrupt, it is an indication of poor or no innovation in the market. Think about MySpace or Radio Shack or Sears as examples of businesses that used to dominate the market, but failed to adjust and went belly-up.
If it is broke, just manipulate the gov statistics.
Are you questioning your betters?
Yuno hoo, If it’s a serious question:
"Serious question: If it ain’t broke, why “fix” it (by cutting interest rates)?"
The economy responds to the Fed rate. Raise it and the economy cools (inflation comes down, unemployment goes up). If you leave it high, you trigger a recession.
Lowering the Fed rate spurs the economy. Unemployment goes down, but inflation goes up.
The goal is to balance it with rate changes (up or down, depending on the metrics). Ideally you want unemployment around 4% (full employment) and inflation between 2% and 2.5%.
The X factor is the stock market. It likes stability, and prefers lower interest rates (cheaper to borrow money), but what it wants most is dependability. If rates go up or go down, but it is telegraphed in the months ahead of the Fed meeting, businesses are generally happy. Sudden or unexpected moves, even if it is for lowered interest rates, makes businesses nervous and they pull back, negatively impacting the economy (in terms of GDP growth).
The impressive thing about what’s happening now is that there should have been a recession. The eye of the needle they had to thread to lower inflation without tipping over into a recession was miniscule. Somehow they managed it.
The FBI believes Iranian hackers were behind the theft of emails from former President Donald Trump's campaign.
I'm okay with the deep state making Iran our new boogeyman.
As long as Iran makes the Deep State our new boogeyman too, I approve.
Has the FBI told us which country is behind all the fake bomb threats in Springfield. they are claiming they came form outside the country then they also know who did it, why won't they tell us, who are thy protecting
I'm curious when we will have intel agencies spying on her for receiving stolen info from an enemy country.
I've seen it reported that the Kamala campaign refused to use any of the hacked info on Trump. I'm guessing it's either not much of consequence, or if it is something major, Kamala will use it as an October surprise a week or two before the election.
And if such a law was passed, it would likely prevent low-income Americans from qualifying for credit cards, hurting the very people it is meant to help.
Well then I will issue an EO to issue Trump Card's to every American. Elected me please, I'll give you cash whatever you want. Just elect me. Otherwise the Dems will meddle in the economy and destroy the country with their wasteful spending.
And if such a law was passed, it would likely prevent low-income Americans from qualifying for credit cards..
How else can you prevent low income Americans from drowning in debt?
Yeah. Really don't get this. The high default group is subsidized by those who pay their bills. Eric seems to be arguing for cost transfers.
If your financial plan is to borrow money at 23 percent you are destined for bankruptcy unless you are expecting a guaranteed windfall in the near future and frankly a 10 percent rate probably wouldn't change that very much. Still a dumb idea and I wish Trump would stop this stupid pandering. He looks as bad as Harris.
Don’t give them any credit.
The government trying to protect people from their own decisions has harmful effects on those people, to no intelligent persons surprise.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
- C.S. Lewis
Any bets on when the Harris campaign is going to pick this one up?
actually poor people shouldn't be using credit cards its to easy to screw up and go into greater debt. However for years i din't have one and at one point thought i would have to look for work out of town which meant staying at hotels while looking ,the only problem is hotels will only take credit cards.
its a dam if you do and dam if you don't
That should be up to them and their needs and of course the credit card company.
I personally waited till I was about a year from buying my first house before getting one. Got a small limit $500 card and paid it off every month, only using it on a few purchases a month and never took it out with me when I was going to a bar. But I also had parents that drilled in to me from a very early age, save your money/delay instant gratification and live within my means.
I use credit cards where cards are the only practical way to pay because they have better fraud protections and aren't tied directly to your bank account, and never for credit. And with some cards, they also pay you to use it if you pay it off every month.
This is what I do now. I was terrible with credit when I was young but finally figured it out. I pay almost all my bills with credit card but never carry a balance.
That's the way to build a fantastic credit score. I haven't been under 800 since my 20s because my mom explained that the only way to build your credit score was to be seen by the credit bureaus paying everything off on time. Buy with a credit card and pay it off every month and never, ever spend more than you can pay off. If some months you only charge $20, that's fine. It's the "pay it all off" part that matters.
How about a card that connects directly to the central bank that just prints new money anytime anybody needs to make a payment? Equity.
Damn fine idea but just so a greenback is printed- don't want to piss off the cotton and ink industry.
At this point requiring that a physical bill is printed might be considered as big of a burden as the gold standard. "We can't possibly be expected to keep a sheet of actual paper somewhere can we?" Better write it into law that it has to be a $1 bill otherwise they will just print a handfull of billion dollar bills every day
…as hand-held radios and walkie-talkies detonated.
I’ll be right back, I’m going to mail a Mr. Microphone to Rashida Tlaib.
The Bee:
Rashida Tlaib Uninjured After Her Pager Mysteriously Explodes
You could take out half the squad with a Princess Phone
I had to google what Mr. Microphone is.
I think I remember seeing one or two in the 90s. If I were a kid in the late 70s, though, it would certainly have been on my Christmas wish list.
...Trump proposed capping credit card interest rates at "around 10 percent."
Nothing bad ever comes from cheap money.
Or artificial market rates, for that matter.
Nope, nothing bad at all ...
"The House of Representatives voted Wednesday to block a bill that would avert a government shutdown when the fiscal year ends on September 30."
But mostly the Democrats. Very few Republicans voted against the bill.
If Democrats control the House, blame Democrats. If Republicans control the House, blame Democrats. Whatever it is, blame Democrats.
Why no, actually Sarcasmic swears he's not a Democrat. It's only a coincidence that criticism of the party enrages him.
Maybe he's trying to impress that chubby purple-haired barista at the coffee shop.
Someone needs to tell Sarc that that barista is actually a dude.
That’s non-binary thinking.
White Mike is now Purple Mike?
Where is White Mike these days?
Mike took time off to transition and will soon be known as White Nolan Michelle.
Interestingly, Mike did once say something nice about Trump so if he…if she donates to Act Blue and becomes contestant number 3 we can rest assured that the narrative from the pro assassinate Trump crowd would be that she can be labeled as a conservative.
Nah, Mike will always be a liberal. People don't just throw their beliefs out the window just because one guy screwed them over. Ideals have a stickiness that's stronger than duct tape.
Nolan Michelle once ran as a libertarian. So maybe she’ll be labeled as that if she goes all Act Blue donor. Or the current agenda to mislabel her as conservative will continue.
If it was largely Democrats who voted against the bill, should they not be taking credit for blocking the bill, as that seems to have been their intent?
Why should they not get credit (or blame, depending on whether you see it as a good or bad act) for achieving their goal?
I'm just waiting for Sarc to blame Trump, somehow, for this bill not passing.
Shocking. Another false strawman.
That's not a strawman, because it's not an argument. If you want to see a strawman, look in the mirror.
You're arguing that people are unfairly blaming the Democrats for everything, you little retard.
I’m not entirely convinced that you even read your own posts.
He’s as bad at reading his own posts as Shrike is at reading his own links.
Sarc doesn't read his citations either. Why he switched to only citing Google.com.
An observation is not an argument, retard. Three of you idiots not understanding what a strawman argument is doesn't make me the one who is wrong.
You mean your lie.
But please tell us how your repeated lie is not you making an argument.
It wasn't an "observation" because you made it up. To be fair I guess I should have called it a lie, instead of an argument.
He used it to dismiss someone else's argument. It is an argument. That was the purpose.
How many thousands of times have you guys said that Trump and the GOP were not responsible for anything that happened while Democrats controlled the House?
Then Jerry blames Democrats for something that happened while Republicans control the House.
The observation is that Democrats get the blame no matter who controls the House.
And that you guys will attack anyone who points it out.
A lot of the word “you” in that post.
Literally zero.
That's your binary thinking strawman.
Well, we did gaslight him.
Key words missing in your statement, you little weasel. Here, let me add it for you.
Trump and the GOP were not responsible for anything that the Democrats did while the Democrats controlled the House
You always try to trick people with toddler-tier sophistry.
Bull. That’s a straw man so large, I can see it from NE Illinois.
You're not making an argument? So you're just lying about your opponents arguments without using it as an argument? Lol.
Ignoring comments with "you" in them.
DEMOCRATS SAVED THE FILIBUSTER ! - Sarc
Every Democrat voted to get rid of it, but former Democrats Synema and Manchin who are still in their caucus voted with every Republican to save it.
Recall a piece of legislation where one Republican voted for it and the rest against it. White Mike exclaimed Bipartisan support!
I recall this thing called The CARES Act that passed a Democrat controlled House with a veto-proof majority that included almost all Republican members, yet the retard brigade still blames Democrats and attacks anyone who says Trump and the GOP bear just as much responsibility.
Then they blame Democrats for what happens in House when it's controlled by Republicans?
Sure.
That's not what I've seen. What I've seen is you & yours bring CARES act up time and time again as 'proof' that Trump supported it since he signed it AND that means he wanted inflationary spending. And then people say "Yeah, he signed it, but only because it was a veto-proof majority behind it. Signing it doesn't mean anything in that context."
At this point both arguments are unconvincing. We don't *know* if Trump would have actually vetoed it if there had been less support. OTOH, while I would have preferred the theater of an actual veto, there's sound reasoning that leans to "reluctantly and strategically" signing the bill.
Honestly there are days when I want to put you AND jesse on mute rather than have to wade through another metric shit-ton of "my daddy can beat up your daddy" and "you're so stupid...".
But I hate to do that, reserving that gesture for the incomprehensible shitposters (sqrlsy, libtrans) and the simply repugnant (mises).
For the spending bills after CARES we do know he would have vetoed the bills if not having an overwhelming majority as he stated so each time.
More lies since you appare try aren't making arguments according to you.
Post the list of the “retard brigade”
Biden..."is set to declare on Thursday that the economy has finally reached a turning point he has long sought,"
That's like what, the 1400th time by now that he's fixed the economy?
Probably wakes up, sees that it's 80 degrees and sunny, figures that's weird weather for late January 2021 in D.C. and then goes about fixing the economy... every morning.
Unfortunately, that turns takes folks right to an apartment complex in Aurora.
Oh bohem you lie so much in such a short space. Can you take a long walk off a short pier?
Or give some semblance of the fed shouldn't exist? Or mention that Arizona recently found people signing up illegals to vote?
As I said yesterday, Boehm is never not retarded.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/az-admits-nearly-100000-voters-incorrectly-listed-voter-rolls-amid
And the SoS wants to ignore the issue this year.
Democrats sued to end an Arizona law that required the state AG to check citizenship databases against those who voted in state elections. Wonder why.
Bohem is the difinition of controlled oposition
Thomas Massie, that third rate grandstander is still in office? I thought we primaried his ass?
Whatever, if people start listening to him we'll just say his tie looks too "Stars and Bars" and have keyboard cat play him off.
The FBI believes Iranian hackers were behind the theft of emails from former President Donald Trump's campaign.
But they know it was the Democrats.
Did reason finally can Liz for being too libritarian and honest about her bias?
She's on sabbatical until November is safely tucked away.
Urinalism has no place for folks like her.
'The rate cut should mean some relief for consumers looking to make big purchases.'
Like the Federal government?
However, existing federal laws already prohibit noncitizens from voting,
Thay check box ensures it. And those threats for people who they to match voter rolls to citizenship. I mean let's just ignore democrats continue to sue ant state trying to confirm citizenship, even confirming after someone has voted.
You're a joke Boehm.
There are laws against murder. They still happen.
Hey, there is no proven widespread fraud if you never check for fraud!
Just like there is no widespread peeding on the highway if you never use radar and only measure skid marks on deadly crashes
'Lower mortgage rates could indirectly help bring more supply to the housing market'
Umm, sure. Just like unconstrained immigration can indirectly help raise wages, right?
'Like in every other year, Congress has to pass a new budget (or a continuing resolution) by the dawn of the new fiscal year on October 1. And just like happens in almost every year, lawmakers have failed to do that.'
How about a new budget process? We hold a general, nation-wide vote, and let citizens approve the proposed budget (or not). Oh, and only people who pay taxes are eligible.
"...Oh, and only people who pay taxes are eligible."
No representation without taxation!
'Israel has not claimed credit for the attacks in Lebanon, but the Pentagon is reportedly preparing for a possible Israeli ground invasion of its northern neighbor.'
Why a ground war? If the Mossad has spiked more devices, they can finish off Hezbollah by remote control.
I can only imagine what those guys are thinking every time they pick up their remote controls.
Hezbollah will be pushed to positions north of the Litani river. That is what this is about. They will move north or die in place.
'The FBI believes Iranian hackers were behind the theft of emails from former President Donald Trump's campaign.'
Geez, when even the Iranians don't like you, I guess you might be Hitler.
Teamsters in a post on X tell us they can't figure out who their union wants to endorse. Posts polls. People have questions why majority support isn't the answer.
https://x.com/Teamsters/status/1836463348269092918
This is the first time they haven't endorsed someone. Turns out this time is (D)ifferent.
After reviewing six months of nationwide member polling and wrapping up nearly a year of rank-and-file roundtable interviews with all major candidates for the presidency, the union was left with few commitments on top Teamsters issues from either former President Donald Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris—and found no definitive support among members for either party’s nominee.
The union’s extensive member polling showed no majority support for Vice President Harris and no universal support among the membership for President Trump.
https://teamster.org/2024/09/teamsters-no-endorsement-for-u-s-president/
Whoops. Not meant as a reply.
The Teamsters leadership knows their rank and file overwhelmingly support Trump, but they know if they endorse Trump, they’ll be subject to the knives of every Democrat and every other union out there. One could say they’re afraid of what those folks might do to them.
What a change from four years ago, when their membership overwhelmingly supported FJB.
What changed?
Reality.
Can only piss on someone for so long while telling them it is raining. Unless that someone is sarc.
Probably have a giant inflatable rat in front of Teamsters headquarters.
No widespread support…
(So, majority support is enough to endorse Harris, but universal support is required to endorse Trump? Gotcha.)
It was nearly 2-1 support for Trump (61-34%)
That’s not widespread support, just like there are no widespread voting irregularities
Wow. they moved the goalposts within the one sentence!
This is the first time they haven’t endorsed someone. Turns out this time is (D)ifferent.
First time since 1996. That year, I suspect they were pissed about Clinton signing off on NAFTA, but unions are strictly Dem lobbying operations and that was mainly to send a message to their allies.
"Harris deflects on reparations in interview"
https://www.pressreader.com/usa/san-francisco-chronicle-late-edition/20240919/281668260369212
When you've lost the Chron...
She grew up with a lawn…
...in a town...
https://babylonbee.com/news/i-was-born-into-a-middle-class-family-explains-wife-when-husband-asks-why-the-car-is-on-fire
SAVANNAH, GA — A local man was left completely stumped while questioning his wife about an issue with one of the family's vehicles, having apparently been caught off guard by his wife's insightful and engaging response.
Trent Colson explained that he had arrived at the park to meet his wife and kids, only to find his wife's car on fire in the parking lot, prompting him to rush to make sure she and the couple's children were safe and find out what had happened.
"I was born into a middle class family," his wife, Beth, began. "Where I come from, car fires are the very least of concerns. What is far more important is putting food on the table, keeping the lights on, and knowing your family has a safe home. It is these things that people across this country are focused on, not a vehicle engulfed in flames in the driveway."
Trent later said that he was left off-balance by his wife's articulate and nuanced answer. "I hadn't ever really thought about it that way," he said. "While I was caring so much about learning why the car was on fire, I was completely ignoring the fact that she was born into a middle-class family. That answer blew me away. It changed everything. I saw the situation in a completely different light."
At publishing time, following Beth's widely praised response to his question, Trent had reportedly left the conversation with a newfound respect for his wife and was completely unconcerned about the flaming vehicle in the parking lot.
"When you’ve lost the Chron…"
I just call up my guy.
language that would require proof of citizenship as part of voter registration processes in the states. However, existing federal laws already prohibit noncitizens from voting
You realize these are two different things and the talking point "it's already against the law" won't hunt?
Noncitizens being barred from voting is the end goal. Requiring proof of citizenship is a proactive enforcement measure, to make sure that occurs. Two different things.
By their logic, background checks for gun sales are not needed, since it is already against the law for prohibited persons from attempting to procure a firearm.
And it's already a felony to knowingly (or should have known) provide a firearm to a prohibited person.
Two assassination attempts on the leading opposition candidate for President, and we still do not know diddly-shit about the shooters. The FBI (and DOJ) are on the case, with the full support of the AG, is what we are told.
Does anyone seriously think we will have answers before 11/5?
I do not, and the intelligence community has been gunning for Pres Trump (pun intended) since day 1. I also think that there will be at least 1-2 more attempts; the IC are invested in seeing Pres Trump not win. Now the question is, will the USS just 'accidentally on purpose' look the other way when some other asshole loser takes his shot.
You should ask poster Nelson and his ilk the belief from that group is it’s disgruntled republicans and internal strife in the party. At least that’s the current talking point circulating so to answer your question we have the answers no need for more investigation.
Since the information we have indicate it was a pro-gun conservative (first shooter) and a disgruntled Trump voter (second shooter) that tried to kill him, the obvious conclusion is that conservatives are the ones willing to try to take out Trump.
Don't get me wrong. I'm absolutely certain there are far-left wingnuts that would love to take a shot at him, too. It's just that the ones who have actually done it so far have been conservatives.
The key to victory for Team Trump: Let Kamala speak (incessantly).
The debate was a wash (as I predicted). It did not alter the dynamics of the race. All it shows is the more Kamala speaks, the more her support gently erodes.
The election is close. I stated way back when, it will come down to AZ, GA and WI. Looks like GA is now locked down. AZ is a toss-up, and WI is within MoE. I think Kamala wins WI (with judicial help from WI-SC).
PA is lost to Kamala. Her stance on fracking hurt her. The recent ballot decision by PA-SC hurts her.
Right now, it is Kamala's race to lose, and she will as she talks more and more. Pres Trump appears to be on track for a narrow EC victory.
Trump would have done much better in the debate if he could have just ignored the barbs. And between now and election day he needs to try hard to keep in on the rails--making up random tax code changes is not a good plan.
This was the risk of nominating him in the first place. He's old as shit, and was never particularly focused in debate settings even in 2016.
The GOP really needed to put a Gen-Xer on the line. Vance is far more agile and more effective at calling out the media on their bullshit, but he's not running for President. It says how bad a candidate Harris really is, that Trump remains within striking distance of her to begin with.
Well, he *won* the nomination in primaries.
Harris won Arizona way back in 2020. The state has the mother of all fortifications: the GOP has around a 5% statewide registration advantage and by 2025, it will have gone blue for President and have two Democratic Senators and a Democratic Governor.
A lot of that GOP advantage went to shit after McCain died. Most of the party's success in the 21st century there was due to his political machine getting votes locked in across the board for years. It's not an accident that the Dems' ballot harvesting found its first success there in 2018.
>>Hezbollah militants in Lebanon were targeted in a second wave of attacks on Wednesday
stretching way back to my vacation Bible school days but I'm relatively certain the lesson here is don't be a baby killing rapist terrorist.
language that would require proof of citizenship as part of voter registration processes in the states
Can you imagine being opposed to such a straightforward commensense measure? Why would you oppose such a thing? There's only one reason.
hey now people who don't exist contribute to the economy too.
>>Va. GOP Senate nominee Hung Cao
are there out-of-state donation rules? I want one of those pins.
>>the Pentagon is reportedly preparing for a possible Israeli ground invasion of its northern neighbor.
we're helping Hizbollah or we're setting up a defensive perimeter to defend Canada?
>>New data suggest overdose deaths are finally on the decline.
ya everyone's terrified to do blow or drop ecstasy anymore lol.
>>The FBI believes Iranian hackers were behind the theft of emails from former President Donald Trump's campaign.
you have a defining line on when and when not to believe Flowers By Irene?
is the Jets defense overrated? are the Pats running backs underrated? can Kansas State's new QB complete a forward pass before October?
>>Three things to know about Sean "Diddy" Comb's sex-trafficking indictment.
wake me when he fesses to Tupac.
Wake me up before you gogo
Gogo was a very competent assassin, who almost managed to beat/kill Beatrix. I don't think anyone's likely to be able to wake her now though.
Like I said in the ENB thread on him, I honestly think he got pinched because the feds know that he's got a ton of dirt on highly connected people. He's as dirty as Epstein was, and he'll have to make a deal to NOT squeal if he doesn't want his guards "falling asleep" and the cell cameras conveniently losing power before he "hangs himself."
>>he’ll have to make a deal to NOT squeal
word is he offered $50mil cash bail & it wasn't enough
>>Worth noting: The president does not have the power to control credit card interest rates.
the current Mummy-In-Chief had the power to control social media sites.
Headline: "Fed Attempts To Gin Economy For Kamala"
My World Stock Market Index Fund is up 2% today. Just in case you weren't paying attention to what an awful, corrupt and destructive thing the Federal Reserve System is.
How on Earth are people okay with giving someone (anyone much less an unelected someone) that much power? Ridiculous that making a few thousand dollars in one day without any effort at all could make me so upset.
a money's not real argument from the money's not real FED. love it.
Don't know at what point to extract some "profits," since obviously the temporarily non-useless savings accounts are going away very soon.
I suppose going full on Ron Paultism and buying a bunch of gold and silver with the proceeds is a possibility. But I don't have any kids and am reaching the "too old to care" stage of my life...
Edited to put quotes around the word "profit."
Consider investing in toilet paper. Remember last time there was a shortage? The shelves were wiped clean.
>>Don’t know at what point to extract some “profits,”
the forever mystery.
"My World Stock Market Index Fund is up 2% today"
And the S&P is up almost 20% in 2024, even with the higher Fed rate. Businesses like stability and consistency. We've had almost four years of it. While cheaper borrowing costs are beneficial, a predictable market environment is the key to being able to make profits.
There's nothing surprising or nefarious about any of this. It's literally the definition of a well-functioning economy.
The REAL question is.......
What kind of a USA do we live in when the 'Feds' are setting [Na]tional mandated interest rates and fake-$fiat$-bills?
Funny the nation existed from 1787 till 1907 just FINE.
Till New York City Banks ran a corruption scheme and weren't held liable for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907
"The panic was triggered by the failed attempt in October 1907 to corner the market on stock of the United Copper Company. When the bid failed, banks that had lent money to the cornering scheme suffered runs"
So instead of the government ensuring JUSTICE on those banks/bankers as it should have been they decided to setup a [Na]tional SCAM Bank of their own.
"The Federal Reserve System, created in 1913, was supposed to ensure the nation’s economic stability by controlling the money supply. But the still-new institution’s policies in the 1920s not only failed to stop the Great Depression but actually may have helped to cause it."
“There was a drastic 67 percent increase in the money supply between 1921 and 1929,”
"Creating the Fed didn't solve the nation's economic problems. In fact, a few decades after the Fed was created, its policies made the Great Depression"
And the constant Depression, Recession, Inflation, etc, etc, etc continues to go on - and on - and on ever since.
Stupid. Absolutely Stupid. Everything Democrats sold their Fake-$Fiat$ bank scam as a fix for has literally shown itself to make worse.
As it is with every 'fix' they have pitched ever since.
The kind of stupid that can't even LEARN from after-effect.