Unfortunately There's a Debate Tonight
Plus: Columbia's outside agitators, E.U. antitrust crackdown prevails, and more...

What to watch for tonight: Hopefully, both candidates will appear cogent and awake, which will be a welcome change from last time.
That's not to say either is a great debater or speaker. It was back in 2019 that former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii)—then an actual Democrat vs. a Fox News talking head—forced Vice President Kamala Harris into a defensive crouch, saying Harris owed apologies to people who "suffered under [her] reign" as prosecutor, which Harris responded to ineptly.
Former President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has been on a tear lately, holding a press conference on Friday during which he…reminded voters of all the sexual assault and harassment allegations against him, which is seemingly not in his best interest. ("The former president also repeatedly implied he would not have assaulted two of his accusers due to their looks," read a clinical Associated Press write-up of the conference.)
Though the candidates are neck and neck in the polls, Trump has had a bad August. Harris, meanwhile, was able to ride a bit of Democratic National Convention news cycle momentum but is now concerned about the debate format.
"Kamala Harris had planned to object, fact-check and directly question Donald Trump while he was speaking during their debate next week," reports Politico. "But now, with rules just finalized to mute the candidates when their opponents speaks, campaign officials said Harris advisers are scrambling to rewrite their playbook."
As for the issues themselves…Harris, as of this week, has populated her website with actual policy positions. We'll see now whether she can actually answer for them.
Expect border issues to be front and center during this debate, specifically Harris' record as border czar. Her campaign—and an obsequious mainstream media—has downplayed her role, claiming actually she was in charge of tackling the deeper root causes, so none of the chaos is truly her fault. The Biden/Harris administration has seen a record influx of migrants at the southern border, which they attempted to crack down on via a June executive order that placed restrictions on asylum seekers.
Expect economic issues to be highlighted, too. Trump will most likely look to ding Harris on the rampant inflation that has the made cost of living far higher under the Biden administration. But they've both converged on a broader gospel of economic populism—neither is a fan of free markets, and both want certain types of protectionism and economic interventionism. (Trump's tariffs would cause certain economic ruin, if imposed; but, of course, tariffs are woefully unsexy, so we'll see how much airtime such things get tonight.)
Abortion, a topic Harris' campaign has attempted to ding Trump on, will also likely be emphasized, especially with Trump's recent vows to provide free in vitro fertilization to those who seek it and his opposition to Florida's more restrictive abortion laws. (Another area of slight convergence: Though Trump appointed conservatives to the Supreme Court who ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade and made Dobbs the law of the land, returning the issue to the states, he's not especially pro-life and tends to favor some lenience on first-trimester abortions.)
It remains to be seen whether Harris will embrace far-left economic policies—President Joe Biden's policies, just bigger—or whether she will try to downplay the economic populist agenda she's cobbled together. It remains to be seen whether Trump will be able to effectively sell himself as the candidate with working-class voters' best interests in mind vs. someone interested in petty ranting, settling scores, and putting his opponent down. Perhaps the most telling thing of all about tonight will be that the two politicians have less ideological distance between them than we might have hoped.
Scenes from New York: Readers of this newsletter will remember the scene at Columbia University's Hamilton Hall this past April, in which a mixture of anti-Israel students and outside agitators—full breakdown unknown—broke into and occupied the building. This week, Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg "announced the indictment of one of the most visible outsiders: James Carlson, a Brooklyn lawyer and activist, on charges of arson and criminal mischief," reports The New York Times. "Prosecutors said he ignited an Israeli flag with a lighter and destroyed a camera in jail. They say he also broke into a university building, for which he faces a separate case."
Carlson is 40 years old and "also among the anti-Israel protesters in January who wreaked havoc on the city by blocking traffic at the Holland Tunnel as well as the Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Williamsburg Bridges," a source told the New York Post. In San Francisco, back in 2005, he got in trouble with the law for marching against the Group of Eight (G8) summit (and capitalism writ large) and being part of a throng that ultimately cracked a cop's skull, nearly killing the man. He is the son of now-deceased millionaire ad execs and media reports claim that property records show him to be the owner of a posh multi-million-dollar Park Slope brownstone purchased in 2019.
I suppose sometimes your college-kid freedom fighters end up being middle-aged trust funders in the end; let's hope some consequences dissuade the man from continuing his illustrious rioting career.
QUICK HITS
- "This is the Harris-Walz media strategy in a nutshell: Avoid the press at all costs, even when asked questions that should be layups," argues The New Republic. "The Democratic ticket, or perhaps those who advise them, seem to believe that nothing good can come from talking to the media—that answering questions only invites negative coverage of pseudo-scandals (like [Minnesota Gov. Tim] Walz relatives endorsing Trump) instead of the real issues at stake in November. If this sounds familiar, it's because President Biden employed the same media strategy in his reelection campaign. That didn't work out so well for him—and it may not for Harris, either."
- Both Apple and Google just lost their court fights following European Union crackdowns on big tech companies. Google had challenged a fine for allegedly abusing its search engine dominance, while Ireland had given Apple preferential tax treatment that was undone by the courts.
- "The Miami-Dade Police Department has opened an investigation into Sunday's traffic incident that's raised concerns about police use of force after the MDPD released video showing [Tyreek] Hill, who is Black, being dragged from his car and forced face-down on the ground," reports Axios.
- The first private spacewalk is slated to happen over the next few days, courtesy of SpaceX and billionaire Jared Isaacman. It will occur as part of the Polaris Dawn mission, which took off from Florida early this morning.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hopefully, both candidates will appear cogent and awake, which will be a welcome change from last time.
Well, awake anyway. [inappropriate cackle]
If you hold your phone against your head, the Joy! will go directly into your aura.
Just saying.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy
Will Kamalala’s include a car, resort, and cruises full of propaganda?
You will be under her high heel and enjoy it.
You will have to be high to enjoy it
"Strength Through Joy"
But remember, only Trump uses scary Nazi images and references.
...saying Harris owed apologies to people who "suffered under [her] reign" as prosecutor, which Harris responded to ineptly.
Backpage has left the chat.
The former president also repeatedly implied he would not have assaulted two of his accusers due to their looks...
I don't want to live in a world where this is not a valid defense.
Is he wrong? The man has a track record of not pursuing women that name their cat vagina. That seems like a germane defense.
Wait, is naming cat vaginas a thing now?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-verdict-carroll-rape-case-b2335801.html
Actually, it's Vagina T Fireball. I guess that cat has a hot one.
A fast, hot pussy.
Sounds like an STD.
That and the fact there is zero evidence. The evidence Carrol did submit was a dress that came out nearly a decade after the claimed assault. The judge also allowed other women who had no evidence and hadn't been adjudication to testify against rules of procedure. And even then the jury agreed she wasn't raped but the judge said they could change the word rape to assault.
Her entire story was also lifted from one of her favorite TV shows at the time.
'Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii)—then an actual Democrat vs. a Fox News talking head'
Liz, do you really think Gabbard (and many others) shifted right? Or did Democrats go on a progressive binge and leave most moderates behind?
She wasn’t even really moderate - just sane
Getting added to a secret watch list by the current administration will force a sane person to rethink their "allies".
yes
But we have to elect Harris to make sure Trump does not use the legal system to harass and punish his political enemies.
The same political system being used to punish Trump and other enemies of the regime.
I really hope Trump takes the gloves off and actually goes after the democrats for all every legitimately illegal thing they’ve done.
Getting added to a secret watch list by the current administration will force a sane person to rethink their “allies”.
As minuscule as the chances of it happening are, a couple criminal sentences handed down at the DOJ are appropriate.
Literally zero probability of it happening during a Harris administration.
Funny Liz categorizes 'Fox news talking heads' in such away but never the left wing moderators.
“Liz, do you really think Gabbard (and many others) shifted right?”
No, no, no, it’s Tulsi, Taibbi, Greenwald, Schellenberg, Weiss, etc who suddenly gave up a lifetime of anti-war activities, because they were bedazzled by the orange man.
Dick Cheney, Mitt Romney, Bolton, etc. had similar changes in character, but to the side of good.
Those 4 are true conservatives god dammit.
Raytheon approves this message.
War is soo gay.
Chase is war??
Not sure it is a commutative property, but it is hard to prove either way.
Sarc is going to pop a blood vessel.
Hopefully he doesn’t do that while burning someone’s steak. Hepatitis, anyone?
This is the state of the center-right these days. Remember, these are the same people who go on and on about how today's GOP is about identity and personality, and not about Ideas! or policies:
"You don't have to agree with Collin Allred on a single policy issue to grasp that a person like Ted Cruz cannot be trusted to defend the constitutional order."
What Allahpussy means here by "constitutional order" is, "anything that allows communism to happen at 40 mph rather than 100 mph."
What's particularly notable here is that these people are now openly dropping any pretense about being "the Remnant" who care more about promoting True and Honest Conservatism than simply "pwning the libs." Nick Catoggio, dumbshits like Patrick Frey and his ballwashers at Patterico, and hall monitors like Jonah Goldberg and Kevin Williamson are now admitting that it actually has nothing to do with policy, and everything to do with being the left's bottom bitches in the hopes they'll provide them with a few scraps from the political table. They mean "Country First" the same way the Red Guard did during the Cultural Revolution.
These guys are all prime example of what is wrong with Establishment Conservatism. It was pushed on the world by William F. Buckley and entailed the right making its peace with the Progressive Era and the managerial technocracy it gave rise to in the name of fighting the Soviets . I won't comment either way as to the advisability of that grand bargain at that time. I wasn't there to make that decision at that time. But, the Soviets were beaten more than thirty years ago. That was the time to return to America's foundations. But, establishment conservatism got their seat at the managerial-technocratic table. And they opted to continue their lucrative sinecures, trading perpetual war for a perpetual progressivism.
The rest of us were told we had to go along with it and STFD and STFU. These guys were the experts, donchaknow! Just ignore the perpetual failures.
They admittedly had a good racket going for a long time, and still do in some areas. They never had to actually deliver on anything they promised, because they could always say, "well, look, at least we're not Democrats! If you don't vote for us, the Democrats will take over and get 100% of what they want!"
Like the script in Casino goes, "If they hadn't been so greedy, they would have been harder to spot. But in the end, they're all greedy." Once the party's voters started realizing that the neocons weren't actually running things competently or advancing a conservative agenda while in power, the break started happening. First with Iraq--regardless of why the invasion happened, it would have been less politically toxic in the end if the administration hadn't tried to make it into a western liberal democracy, and treated it like Panama (go in and get out) rather than Afghanistan.
What really accelerated the break was the GOPe getting McCain the nomination in 2008, coupled with the bank bailout of TARP. The party not only nominated someone that the base really didn't like all that much due to his thirst for asspats from the Democratic media, it then facilitated a ransom payment to the banks to cover for their own malfeseance, instead of sending these assholes to prison for securities fraud. After that, in the wake of Obamacare passing, they nominated Romney, who had passed a version of that prior to the federal law coming into play.
The GOPe getting behind Jeb while the base was increasingly pissed off about immigration was the final straw.
Like I've mentioned before, the biggest issue with the GOPe and their mouthpieces like Jonah Goldberg is that they've always operated under a paradigm that assumed the left and the right shared the same values. It's why they were always going on about "well, just imagine if someone on the right did this!" every time the left gleefully ignored those boundaries to advance their own agenda. They never bothered trying to stop this from happening, they simply complained that it happened and moved on, accepting that the envelope had been moved further to the left and that was the new "normal". They never understood, or just simply ignored, the left's will to power and didn't have the stomach to act as a counter-revolutionary force at home. It's why they hold such a contradictory view about appealing to Reagan-era Americanism while denying that culture has any impact whatsoever on a nation's identity.
For the power brokers like the Cheneys or Bill Kristol, it was always for the purely venal purpose of using the Reagan movement to further enrich themselves, using American troops as meat shields to accomplish it.
They never understood, or just simply ignored, the left’s will to power and didn’t have the stomach to act as a counter-revolutionary force at home.
Or, as I suggested, they're fundamentally on the same side. Once you see the Buckleyan right as having fundamentally aligned itself with the ruling managerial technocracy, a lot more falls into place. Standing athwart history yelling stop (as opposed to, say, "This whole thing is a bloody disaster.") both fundamentally invests your audience in the managerial-technocratic status quo and pre-announces the whole project as an exercise in futility (inasmuch as it presupposes a directional history the world is evolving toward). In effect, it lulls an otherwise unwilling audience into broad compliance with the managerial technocracy. As I say above, you might be able to make the case that such a strategy was understandable in the face of the Soviet threat in the Cold War. But, of course, the Conservative Inc commentariat gained a lot of power, prestige and affluence playing that role. And has proven loathe to relinquish it in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet threat.
They’re all Russian assets! - jeff probably
To be fair, I took Liz to mean her recorded political affiliation, vs sentimental affiliation.
...campaign officials said Harris advisers are scrambling to rewrite their playbook.
Her campaign officials are saying this? I guess that's one way to have expectations go down harder than...
'"Kamala Harris had planned to object, fact-check and directly question Donald Trump while he was speaking during their debate next week," reports Politico.'
"Fact-check"? How? Using her awesome knowledge of economics, science, history, Venn diagrams?
In the first debate within the first 10 minutes Trump said "I don't know what he said and I don't think he does either." He will be able to do the same after her first word salad.
Bingo....exactly this. If Pres Trump does that, and it is obvious it was a total Kamala word salad, VP Harris is toast.
Let's just hope he follows that script.
That quote should go down in history like Reagan’s “there you go again” to Jimmy Carter in 1980. By itself, that comment regarding Biden sank Biden’s entire campaign and killed his political career. Someone should have called 911 after it as a murder happened.
There was the joke, after the debate, that Trump was going to be indicted on another charge in Georgia: abuse of a corpse.
Ukraine is a country in Europe. Russia is a much larger country next to it...
Press: Kamala's masterful knowledge of foreign policy! Sharpest Kamala ever!
Sharp as a ping pong ball.
Don't forget yellow skool busses.
Was about to ask who the least sharp on their feet politician out there was planning to do any of that.
She wanted to say "I am talking" incessantly like the catty bitch she was with Pence.
Trump might also want to mention he'd love to have more debates but she is not willing to do so.
How do you fact-check a fact-check in real time?
Usually this is just some bullshit bravado spin.
“They finally added an ‘Issues’ section to her website . . . Unfortunately for Harris, its release was undermined by a simple but telling error: The page’s source code revealed that parts of the platform were copied directly from Biden’s campaign page.”
But recycling is a left-wing virtue.
Is this like the plastic recycling. We send it from CA to China and it's considered recycled?
Well, 10% of the money gets recycled back to a US bank.
Does 10% of that still go to the Big Guy?
Yes. But no audit will ever find it.
With a large helping of diesel fuel added.
Plagiarizing the plageraizer. Check mate Donald.
8D chess.
Is that like DDDDDDDD? Oh, you said "chess".
The page’s source code revealed that parts of the platform were copied directly from Biden’s ..
Too fucking lazy to retype a few sentences?
The sqrsly campaign.
Tim the enchanter?
Does it still copy paste that garbage?
Unfortunately, yes.
Well, she is the same candidate, just with a reskin.
JD Vance Tries to Tether Harris to Biden
The most Politico of Politico headlines in recent memory.
...specifically Harris' record as border czar.
Slander! Libel!
Kamala the Terrible.
"kamala" is the Finnish word for "horrible."
I think Kammy used to say, "Is you finish yet?"
But only in the appropriate racial context.
I think she would say, "Do you want to finish on my face or in my mouth?"
This is fun, from Stephen Green at PJM shows us media chemjeffery in action:
Harris support rises among some likely voters: POLL
if you thought they meant that's what happened in the latest poll... Well, you just might be a Sarcasmic.
"As previously reported, Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump by a slight 4 percentage points, 50-46%, among all adults and registered voters alike, and by 6 points, 52-46%, among likely voters in the latest ABC News/Ipsos poll. While those numbers are virtually identical, closer assessment shows movement to Harris in some groups when comparing all adults with likely voters -- notably, those younger than 40, younger women in particular and Black people.
"As previously reported" is doing an unconscionable amount of work in that sentence. ABC did not conduct "a new poll — though they are pretending — but a reanalysis of an old poll." The data comes from a poll "taken between August 23, the night Kamala Harris spoke at the Democratic National Convention, and — through the four days of post-convention media afterglow — August 27."
In other words, ABC News cherry-picked some data from an older poll taken during the height of DNC Kamalajoymania and reran it yesterday as fresh news.
In other words, ABC News cherry-picked some data…
That’s called “lying”. Maybe Harris will prosecute ABC for misinformation.
They put margins of errors on them to let us know they are very scientific. When they are off by 5 times the MOE, not their fault.
Think that's bad? Muir is one of the debate moderators and has 100% positive coverage of Kamala on his show.
100% positive coverage is a democrat prerequisite to be a debate moderator.
'Expect border issues to be front and center during this debate, specifically Harris' record as border czar.'
Fake news! Not only was Harris never tasked with border issues, there has never actually been a border.
"Some people did some things, er, drew some lines..."
Borders are just lines on a map.
But they've both converged on a broader gospel of economic populism...
Someone was copying the other's paper on this though, so who knows if it's genuine.
The oracle continues to prophesy.
TheBabylonBee two days ago: The Associated Press today:
It must be tough to come up with good satire these days that doesn’t just become reality shortly thereafter.
Same with conspiracies.
You can't make this upApparently you can.
It remains to be seen whether Trump will be able to effectively sell himself as the candidate with working-class voters' best interests in mind vs. someone interested in petty ranting, settling scores, and putting his opponent down.
At this point either one of these rallies me equally.
Cute and punny.
Honestly, though, I think that Ms Wolfe is selling a false choice here. There is no reason Trump can't appear to be "Pro Working Class" while also putting Harris down. I think too many in the political-horse-race club seem to think that getting in the mud is always bad for candidates. But part of Trump's appeal was showing that he would fight for people that feel they have been taking it on the chin the last decade or two.
After decades of watching the manufactured opposition to the DNC in the form of the GOPe who always retreated after finger wagging from the NYT, good to see someone not care.
Yeah, haven't Democrats consistently dismissed the contingent of working class types who enjoy ranting, settling scores, and putting opponents down? You know, Deplorables.
It's why they're so intent on forcing you to shut up at the point of a gun if you resist them and their stupid political theology.
Like beer spokes-trans-models?
It doesn't hurt that Trump is actually pretty funny.
'This week, Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg "announced the indictment of one of the most visible outsiders: James Carlson, a Brooklyn lawyer and activist, on charges of arson and criminal mischief," reports The New York Times. "Prosecutors said he ignited an Israeli flag with a lighter and destroyed a camera in jail. They say he also broke into a university building, for which he faces a separate case."'
Yeah, but did he file false expense reports or some other truly heinous crime?
Prosecutors said he ignited an Israeli flag with a lighter
A crucifix in a jar of urine is high art, but burning a lgbtqq2+/Israeli/Ukraine flag? That’s blasphemy.
As far as I'm aware the piss crucifix was bought and paid for by the artist and was his property to store how he wants. This guy stole the flag he burnt.
So yeah a thief is worse than a shitty artist.
The Piss Christ artist was given a grant for it from the National Endowment for the Arts.
It won a prize, he didn't get a grant to make it. The problem is the government giving out art prizes and grants at all, not the specifics of Piss Christ.
It also got a grant.
The problem is the hypocrisy and double standards we’re seeing around religious imagery. Piss Christ got a grant but leave tire marks on a LGBTQQ2SMAP+ flag crosswalk and it’s a big fine or prison.
I support the NAP, but I also see provocations that might deserve a punch in the mouth.
All depends on the current hierarchy of where one falls on the scale of oppression. I am told that Christian nationalist are the gravest threat to our "D"emocracy, so they cannot ever be victims or be considered to even take offense.
But is an Islamist extremist shoots up a concert, don't talk about it because Christians are worse.
Well, Serano got a grant. The grant is the problem, not what he did with it (and I think the grant was after photographing piss christ. In any case, I'm pretty sure he could have taken a pic of a plastic crucifix in a jar of piss without it).
I think the people still freaking out 40 years later about a silly photo by an artist who got a modest grant from the NEA and the people who think skidmarks on a fucking crosswalk is a major crime are all being fucking idiots and I agree are motivated by similar impulses. But I don't think it's the best example to point out the hypocrisy you are talking about as the events are 40 years apart and cultural norms have changed a lot.
One was rewarded by the state. The other is charged by the state. Not exactly the same.
“and cultural norms have changed a lot.”
But only the names of the gods and the affiliation of the inquisitors have changed. The culture's underlying motives and impulses are all still right there.
Yeah, pretty much.
And this won't fix everything, of course, but a good start would be not to have government endorsing or funding any kind of art project. Particularly not ones that promote one side of an actively contentious political issue.
If you own the flag, you're free to burn it. If you don't, you're not.
The wealthy Jew is so cheap he wouldn't burn his own Israeli flag.
The biggest search engine monopoly on planet earth is openly admitting it rigs its algorithms to benefit Kamala
Can we take any more Joy?
obvious to everyone one but sarc. His primary citation.
Have you asked alexa who to vote for yet?
I did but she told me she already returned my mail-in ballot.
https://babylonbee.com/news/amazon-says-error-caused-alexa-to-say-if-you-vote-for-trump-i-will-kill-you-in-your-sleep
I won't let that snoopy bitch in my house.
We have some, I regularly ask it questions like "Alexa, where can I buy rat poison and baby food?" or "Alexa, how much lye is needed to fully dissolve a human corpse?" or "Alexa, how many did Satchel Paige strike out last night?"
Sometimes I say "Alexa" then turn up talk radio.
Once again, O'Keefe shows how easy it is to get Silicon Valley tech bros to vomit up their secrets by the clever use of Grindr and Tinder.
They’re too desperate to get laid.
Isn't this the same story Liz reported at Reason?:
Harris' Deceptive Ad Scandal
https://reason.com/2024/08/14/harris-deceptive-ad-scandal/
That's the Harris campaign placing deceptive ads with Google, nothing to do with rigging algorithms.
Nope. This is a whole new little ad scandal as per Google growth strategist Dakota Leazer, in undercover footage: “Leazer reveals that Google has been actively coordinating with the Kamala Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine advertisements to favor her in the 2024 election.”
The video is right there. Give it a watch.
Oh dear, is this another guy mouthing off on a date secret camera video?
It seems the same to me. He hints at other stuff, but the only specific claim is about the ads which seems pretty dubious given the previous reports.
Google is no doubt biased but I give this guy a 0 credibility score.
Why?
Why would the Google growth strategist lie about it on a date?
There are many reasons he might lie; to impress a date for one. But that’s not why I doubt his story. I doubt his story for the following reasons:
1 He says that Google was making the ads look like official news stories. This story was widely publicized that it was the Kamala campaign that did this. Google just displayed the ads.
2 He gives no specifics other than the above which seemingly he gets wrong.
3 He contradicts himself. He says Google has Dem bias, but then says they would do anything for a profit.
4. He also attributes this plan to billionaires and Facebook, which his job at Google would give him no insight.
5 He said Google admitted it. So lets just accept what Google admitted and forget about the shady guy on hidden camera that may be nothing more than a peon for Google. What has Google admitted?
"Trump's tariffs would cause certain economic ruin, if imposed; but,"
Nothing like what Harris's 25% tax on unrealized gains would do.
Broooo. You don't even have 100 million. -NPCs
Just wait for a couple of years of 1000% inflation.
Great. Then we get to tell Zimbabwe to hold our beer.
I bought a couple of the ZW$100 BILLION notes just for grins, think I paid like $6.95. Only currency I ever saw with an expiration date 6 months after the printed date.
I'm no fan of tariffs but the Koch/Reason obsession with them has reached the absurd. To claim that tariffs will cause certain economic ruin while ignoring price controls, a 28% corporate tax, and "wealth" taxes on unrealized gains is nonsensical.
Because Koch would rather produce items overseas in shithole countries then pocket the huge profit than produce here and reap a smaller profit.
Is the cheap foreign shit even more cost effective when you have to replace it every year?
It is to the manufacturer. You, the consumer, not so much.
Perhaps the most telling thing of all about tonight will be that the two politicians have less ideological distance between them than we might have hoped.
Unfortunately neither can be counted on to exact vengeance on our would-be covid overlords, which is this voter's single issue.
No amnesty!
Never forgive. Never forget.
Prosecutors said he ignited an Israeli flag with a lighter and destroyed a camera in jail.
He smuggled a flag, a lighter and a camera into prison???
Extra space in his, uhm, body cavity.
Nature's pocket
He hid them under his tiny hat.
Hey Rocky, watch me pull a flag, lighter, and camera out of my hat.
“Aw, that trick never works.”
Who needs clarifying commas?
Pandas.
'The Democratic ticket, or perhaps those who advise them, seem to believe that nothing good can come from talking to the media'
Let's clarify. I am sure the DNC wants to avoid probing questions from people (whoever they might be) who might use factual knowledge to challenge candidates' claims and proposals. But the past years have proven that "media" don't indulge such traitorous impulses.
I suppose sometimes your college-kid freedom fighters end up being middle-aged trust funders in the end...
As long as there's a trust fund somewhere in the mix.
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
The US has no functional president and has not had one for months, and it's barely noticeable and barely matters because there's a permanent unelected machine that runs the government.
The Kennedy assassination and Watergate were both part of the same coup.
In his memoirs, Chuck Colson of Watergate fame said that Jimmy Carter told him with tears in his eyes that "they" wouldn't let him do anything he had planned to do as president before his election.
As charming as he was, and as much as I hate to admit it, Reagan was probably an establishment man, and the rest up to Trump certainly were.
I think it was Tucker who mentioned all the Naval Intelligence connections to Watergate including Bernstein. If someone digs into the narrative it is clear it was another deep state coup.
And the CIA connections too.
First they got rid of Spiro Agnew on a dubious testimony of a guy who said he gave him a bribe, and replaced him with Deep State puppet Gerald Ford.
Then when Nixon started digging deeper into the military contracts – bang – Watergate. Which was peanuts compared to what Clinton, Bush and Obama did.
Reagan wouldn't have even sniffed the White House if he wasn't tied to them to a certain extent. But remember that he wasn't fully a member of the club--the Buckley wing of the party thought they'd nerfed him in 1976 with their support of Ford, because they didn't expect someone of his age to continue pursuing the presidency.
When they realized they couldn't stop him from getting the nomination in 1980, they convinced him to take on one of his biggest center-right critics, Bush, as VP, the same way the GOPe convinced Trump to take on Pence. Bush was there to ensure Reagan didn't wander too far into the conservative populism that made him so popular, and that any American patriotism he expressed in speeches was done within the framework of "the US as the home of globalist democracy" rather than the unique culture and character that made the country what it was. That's how the 1986 amnesty ultimately happened, and why New World Order, End of History globalism became the establishment's new religion after the Warsaw Pact and Soviet Union collapsed.
I highly suspect the reason the party establishment allowed Goldwater to be nominated in 1964 was because they knew there was no way in hell a Republican was going to beat LBJ in the wake of Kennedy's assassination, and decided to use him as a sacrificial lamb in an effort to nip the growing populism of the party's voters in the bud.
"When they realized they couldn’t stop him from getting the nomination in 1980, they convinced him to take on one of his biggest center-right critics, Bush, as VP"
That makes a lot of sense.
It’s why the neocons were always going on about the “three-legged stool” of Reagan-era conservatism, and their pathetic worship of politics as an amiable exercise rather than a street fight. The implication was that they were still the ones in charge of the party and that it would fall apart without them, regardless of whether Reagan actually delivered what he promised or not.
Their manic opposition to the Soviet Union was, in hindsight, clearly more about simply having an international bete noir to rail against to justify increased military spending, rather than opposition to communism itself. That’s why they so readily surrendered to cultural marxism here in the US, allowed it to become the de facto worldview of the globalist west, and uncritically quote marxist pundits if they’re complaining about Trump.
No it doesn’t
Your analysis, no offense, bless your heart, is one of the worst most error-filled piles of crap I’ve seen.
I’m not sure how old you are, but I know if you were alive you weren’t paying any attention.
“The Buckley Wing”?!? Reagan WAS the Buckley wing. WFB was far from an establishment Republican. He championed Goldwater and Reagan against the Rockefeller wing of Keynesians and libertines.
Honestly, you sound like a 30-something who thinks Buckley is synonymous with TNR’s Never-Trumpism if 2016. The National Review of 2016 is not the magazine he ran in the 1960s-1980s. It was the insurgency, not the establishment.
Ditto for Reagan and Bush Sr. Bush Sr didn’t keep Reagan on any reservation, he had no role in the administration.
Just awful, ahistorical stupidity
There's literally nothing ahistorical about it. The Buckleyites were terrified of Reagan and pushed Ford in 1976 and then Bush or Anderson in 1980.
National Review was never an "insurgency". It was started by a guy who marginalized social conservatives and American populists in favor of softer Yankees and midwesterners.
And stating that the ex-head of the CIA "had no role" in the administration is laughable on its face. His faction fully took over the fucking party in January 1989.
Back when john was still commenting here, he made the observation that the Regime’s greatest fear was that Trump would end up proving that it doesn’t actually matter who’s in charge at the top, because the government is going to continue operating regardless.
What seems to have happened is that the Regime saw that they could manipulate the system whether a Republican or Democrat was President, it was just easier to do so with the latter as a figurehead. Hence, you have puddingbrain Biden as “Chief Executive” at the moment, to be closely followed by Kacklin’ Kammy, of whom the press noted up until July 2024 had several problems regarding staff management, public communication, and general competency that showed she wasn’t up to snuff for the big chair.
They know it doesn't matter who's at the top as long as they can keep the march towards the global managerial technocracy moving apace. The center-right realizes this too, which is why they’ve now abandoned any pretense of pretending to care about “issues” and are openly admitting the tribalism they always possessed, but decried in the people who weren’t letting them run the show as controlled opposition anymore.
"Back when john was still commenting here"
He left but we still have sarcjeff.
Part of me honestly wonders if he was caught up in the January 6 fracas because he stopped commenting here shortly afterwards.
I think he stopped just after the election in November.
The only thing this debate can do is show how incompetent Harris is. She'll spout word salads, cackle, forget things she was briefed on just an hour before, and generally look like a deer caught in headlights.
Their actual claimed policies are meaningless. Harris's sole real policy is to break current society as much as possible, because that's what successful leaders do. How many issues has she copied from Trump now, three? Blaming current tariffs on Trump after Biden has kept them going for 3.5 years and raised them is silly.
What really ought to be at issue in all these actions is the President having such power. No one wants to talk about that elephant in the room.
Harris will accuse Trump of racism, the same way she did to Pence.
I'll bet you a beer.
And no matter what happens, 80% of our "media" will gush about Kamala's brilliant performance. Maddow will probably orgasm on camera.
"Maddow will probably orgasm on camera."
Well thanks for that.
She will be faking it - - - - - - - -
I thought that was already the 'free' square on the bingo card - or is it 'Harris calls Trump a Convicted Felon' instead?
She did it to Biden also, so he can just respond "Thanks, but I already have a VP chosen"
Jeffs unbiased AP digs into how Kamalas choice of doritos connects her with voters.
https://apnews.com/article/harris-doritos-collard-greens-root-beer-food-82956ec65fcf24e6c57712716845d2af?utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
Doritos are expensive. That's rich people food.
Especially a small bag at a gas station. I've got Kroger/Smith's chips on MY shelf...
Vote for Kamala and she'll get you those Doritos! Everyone will be filthy rich!
Chips I had with lunch are Clover Valley tortilla chips.
Don't get me started on the shrinkflation.
I WAS IN THE POOL!
Watching her eat a $6 - 0.5oz bag of chips isn't helping me identify.
The Democratic ticket, or perhaps those who advise them, seem to believe that nothing good can come from talking to the media...
That only works out for a weak candidate if she doesn't have a debate with her actual opponent.
'Both Apple and Google just lost their court fights following European Union crackdowns on big tech companies.'
Haha, "court", haha. Unless you mean the inner circle of nobles clustered around some deranged monarch.
Biden administration is using rarely used pathways to stop Trump from firing DoJ employees if he wins. Deep state must be unburdened.
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/biden-administration-busy-trump-proofing-doj-independent-watchdog-warns
Democracy's last stand, with Biden as Custer.
The Battle of the Little Big Ten Percent.
""Kamala Harris had planned to object, fact-check and directly question Donald Trump while he was speaking during their debate next week," reports Politico. "But now, with rules just finalized to mute the candidates when their opponents speaks, campaign officials said Harris advisers are scrambling to rewrite their playbook.""
Of course, this is bullshit. Harris would have complained regardless. If the mic had been open, she would have complained that evil Trump was talking over her and mansplaining all the time. THE ENTIRE GOAL of the Harris campaign is to set expectations so low that so long as she doesn't shit the bed, everyone will declare that "The final doubts are erased, this is a person who can competently be president!"
The Harris plan is to let the media carry her to victory. She will be a petulant whiner and complainer throughout the debate, and the media will run with any storyline that her handlers provide. If Trump is polite, she will have cowed him into submission. If (more likely) he is his typical Trumpish self, they will talk about that serial abuser and how he treats women.
On the other side, all the sycophantic media is laying the groundwork for "Trump is as mentally incompetent as Biden." Boehm has been flogging that horse for the past week. If he shows any sign of fatigue, the headlines will write themselves.
The only thing Harris has going against her in this debate is herself. Just as Biden put forward a performance that couldn't be whitewashed by a protective media, Kamala could do the same. I think this is unlikely because her staff have done the same analysis and she will be there to play it safe. She will make statements that are vague and she will try to call out a bunch of factoids that the press will happily back up, with the overall goal of playing prevent defense.
“The final doubts are erased, this is a person who can competently be president!”
I have to agree that Kammy can be just as good a figurehead dummy as Joe. And probably easier on the White House maid service and laundry.
Does that include mysterious white stains on blue dresses?
the questions to Kamala will include the answer in the question as they always do for democrats while the questions for Trump will be full of accusations of criminality and racism
You're also going to see the moderators keep following up with Trump's answers saying he didn't address the question. In some cases it will be true (he did misdirect his answers to other talking points in the CNN debate), but you won't see ABC do the same when Kamala dodges the question and answers with some word salad.
I do wonder if ABC will go so far as to have the moderators "fact check" Trump during the debate. Probably.
The Miami-Dade Police Department has opened an investigation into Sunday's traffic incident that's raised concerns about police use of force...
I blame Scottie Scheffler.
Poncharella was just pregame helping Reek conjure up his next TD celebration.
Thank god the cops where latino's...if they had been white I am sure the pre-election riots would be kicking off right about now...
Tyreek is black? No shit?
The first private spacewalk is slated to happen over the next few days...
Away from prying eyes.
In 2019 Kamala advocated for paying for gender surgery for illegal immigrants.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/09/politics/kfile-harris-pledged-support-in-2019-to-cut-ice-funding-and-provide-transgender-surgery-to-detained-migrants/index.html
Nothing that happened before 2020 can be used - - - - - - - -
Think they are actually using July 2024 for that date.
Not even the deport-them-all folks would do that to illegal aliens!
I had to read that section of the article forward and backward to find out this was true.
This is far, far, far worse than kids in cages.
Mutilating illegal aliens?
You don't have to support welfare benefits, voting rights, or a path to citizenship for them for you to oppose this.
You only need to be HUMAN.
Dubya did not advocate this.
Obama did not advocate this.
Trump did not advocate this.
Brandon did not advocate this.
Only Cuntala the 'Ho advocated this!
Matt Walsh got Robin DAngelo yo pay reparations to his producer while filming his new movie.
https://nypost.com/2024/09/08/us-news/white-fragility-author-robin-diangelo-gets-tricked-into-paying-reparations-to-matt-walshs-producer-in-am-i-racist-documentary/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
I'm surprised DiAngelo didn't rifle through the wallets and purses of all the white people nearby.
Before/after of headline changes to WaPo article based on her high turnover rate. She is now a tough prosecutor.
https://x.com/albertemartinez/status/1832063479785599058
May she be unburden by what once was.
The people featured are something else. DiAngelo is the big fish that he landed, but this caught my eye from the Daily Mail article on it.
They see wilting liberals kick Walsh out of a 'Grieving White Privilege' workshop, and a fancy dinner party where rich white women pay handsomely to hear their black host declare: 'This country is not worth saving.'
Walsh presents his DEI consultant subjects as charlatans.
The workshop host, Breeshia Wade, charged him $30,000 for the session.
DiAngelo showed up for $15,000.
I highlighted that part because it's an elegant demonstration of what the left actually believes, and why their appeals to "unity" and "America" are always outright lies.
The people who aren't on their side are America. Their side is Not America. And it's important to remember that as the current polarization continues apace.
Breeshia Wade's worldview, incidentally, is as follows, from her own website:
But Breeshia Wade encourages those who are not Black to consider how their own unexplored grief amplifies the suffering of Black people.
This is the mania of the marxist left--"If you're not falling in with our phony baloney framing of ________, you're oppressing other people."
"The people who aren’t on their side are America. Their side is Not America. And it’s important to remember that as the current polarization continues apace."
Not just "Not America" but Hate America.
The country is worth saving. People like Breeshia Wade and the people who are her allies are not.
Harris, meanwhile, was able to ride a
bit of Democratic National Convention news cyclefull court propaganda blitz momentum but is now concerned about the debate format."The Biden/Harris administration has seen a record influx of migrants at the southern border"
Possibly related observation: Koch-funded libertarians wanted Biden/Harris to win.
Sandra...how does the election look to you today? who wins?
What do you think the debate will be like tonite?
After Biden's debate performance ultimately led to him quitting in shame, I don't expect anything nearly as game-changing this time. (The media will probably declare Harris won the debate no matter what happens.)
I still think Harris is being underestimated by the analysts calling the election a tossup. Still expect her to retain all the states Biden won in 2020, or at worst let 1 or 2 smaller ones slip away which would still result in a narrow Democratic victory.
Agree = (The media will probably declare Harris won the debate no matter what happens.)
I'll check back in a few weeks. I appreciated the detailed explanation you gave while back (months back), which is why I periodically check in to see what you think.
Sandra…how does the election look to you today? who wins?
Oh, Jesus. You probably pay to have your horoscope read or astrology done or whatever too don’t you?
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii)—then an actual Democrat vs. a Fox News talking head
Does this aside go the other way? Are Cheney, Christie, Kizinger also not real conservatives? May confuse sarc.
Former President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has been on a tear lately, holding a press conference on Friday during which he…reminded voters of all the sexual assault and harassment allegations against him
Or... and hear me out, reminding voters of DoJ lawfare against him and the baselessness of the cases with no actual evidence.
They hate that he's able to be the victim. The fact that they made one of the least sympathetic figures in American politics into a sympathetic figure is an indictment that even Kamala should have been smart enough to figure out.
(Trump's tariffs would cause certain economic ruin, if imposed; but, of course, tariffs are woefully unsexy, so we'll see how much airtime such things get tonight.)
Buden-Harris called for even bugger tariffs. Weird that got left out. But I know. Koch owes China a great debt. Which cares they aren't actual free market actors and their theft and such costs are 10x greater than the tariffs. Those costs are fine.
Protective tariffs are the equivalent of a government imposing an embargo against its own people, which if done to another country is an act of war. Doesn’t matter if it’s Republicans or Democrats.
Now it’s your turn, tariff lover. If you possess a shred of honesty (which you do not) then you’ll say that Biden-Harris did a great job in continuing and expanding upon Trump’s tariffs. I condemned them for it (which you did not bookmark because that would be honest and go against your false narrative that I never criticize Democrats), but you were silent. An honest defender of tariffs would have said that was great. Let’s see you do it. Praise Biden-Harris for trade policies you defended under Trump. Policies you still defend, when Trump calls for them. Be honest. I don’t think you can. In fact I know you can’t. That’s because you judge everything based upon who, not what. And of course because you're a lying sack of shit.
It amuses me to no end how many times I have to tell you which tariffs I defend, retaliatory ones. Like when Trump got China to Crack down on theft.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/us-china-trade-deal-intellectual-property-protection-benefits-beijing.html
This has to be the 10th time I’ve told you this. It was just a year ago you thought all tariffs were protective. Then you were unable to tell us which administration used zero tariffs.
How many times do I have to tell you I don’t like protective tariffs but have no problems with retaliatory? Because the theft you applaud is many times greater than the tariffs themselves and got action against that higher cost.
On top of that the tariffs you constantly cry about are 1/3rd of the costs of spending on illegal immigrants you constantly cheer.
You’re just so dishonest and dumb. Amuses me to no end sarc.
Even after giving you this link foe the 10th time you’ll be back here with the same lie.
You’ll also only continue to scream about tariffs while ignoring higher cost abuses to citizens whether it be regulatory policy or spending on illegal citizens. Because you’re a dumb unserious person whose only concern is defending democrats against Trump possibly winning.
You’re pathetic buddy. Lol.
. I condemned them for it (which you did not bookmark because that would be honest and go against your false narrative that I never criticize Democrats),
This is a lie. You brought up Trump instead as you always do. Rushing yo divert any criticism of Democrats. Lol.
How many times have I told you to limit your lies and false premises to one or two if you want me to respond? You put me into a position where I must break down your post sentence by tedious sentence, refuting all your lies and false premises, so my failure to address them isn’t taken as implicit agreement.
Why don’t you try again? But shorter. With fewer lies and false premises.
What lies? Lol. You keep screaming this whenever I give you factual information and even include links. Meanwhile you provide only baseless assertions.
Glad we could have this talk for the 10th time. Tomorrow you can make the same claims despite me being clear yet again and providing links.
Working out well for you buddy. You're so well respected here.
I knew you couldn't do it.
Do what? You didn't make any claims but bald assertions above. What is there to refute? You make unfounded baseless claims even when provided direct reputation against your claims.
You're a clown.
And a master debater. Or something like that.
He’s certainly not a cunning linguist.
Sarcasmic. You are the liar here, and not a very good one, but let's give you a chance to explain yourself.
Why don't you tell us what Jesse has lied about.
He doesn't have time to list them all obviously.
Basically. I’d have to go over your posts sentence by sentence, sometimes breaking individual sentences down because you often pack multiple lies into one.
Now if you could limit yourself to just a few sentences then I might respond.
You could just mute him, instead.
So much time responding. So little time pointing out the lies. Lol.
It's always like that. The second you challenge him to provide even a shred of evidence he won't.
As I’ve been saying, if he limits his lies and false premises to one or two per post, then I’ll address them. But when he puts a dozen or more into a post then I’m not going to break it down sentence by sentence. He’s not worth the effort. Neither are you.
Point out one or two lies. Or read the refutation of my views you lied about yet again. Even gave you a link. Repeated refutation of your bald assertions. Which you call lies. Lol.
which tariffs I defend, retaliatory ones.
Here's a retaliatory tariff for you, Jesse. Let's see you praise it without reservation.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/05/14/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-action-to-protect-american-workers-and-businesses-from-chinas-unfair-trade-practices/
Has Jesse ever once praised any tariff here, Lying Jeffy?
Embargo ≠ tariffs
There is a lot of "you"s in this post.
Good point.
But hypocrisy was always his strong suit.
Difference is that my "you" statements are invitations for him to tell the truth, while his "you" statements are invitations for me to refute his lies.
Bullshit.
Difference is sarcasmic is allowed to say “you” and you aren’t. It’s not that fucking hard. The sarc style guide is only for his enemies.
To be fair, Sarcasmic is as self aware as a goldfish.
It’s [D]ifferent when sarc does it.
Buddy boy pal of mine! You've got an open invitation from practically everybody here to tell the truth. Exceptions being jeffy and Sarc's Pedo Boy Two.
I've never seen anyone whine and complain about victimization more than you. Butplug is undoubtedly the dumbest guy posting here, but even he doesn't play the victim card as you do.
Sarc is a classic elementary school bully type. The second someone punches back he starts crying that he's the victim.
Did this make sense to you?
Meanwhile, my local college just sent out a blast email making excuses and new promises for their new food service contractor. Last year they dumped Sodexo (sure, not the greatest, but...) in favor of a new-age "inspirational" supplier, with all sorts of greenie imaging. After just a couple of weeks, the campus reaction has been (1) yuck! and (2) intestinal disorders.
Of course, the email fulfills the primary coddling strategy by leading with a promise of "safety". No word yet on how a bit of dysentery is just part of a more authentic and sustainable low-tech life.
Food poisoning is equity.
What's up, Peanuts?
Hey, I was busy yesterday. Wingnut.com was going crazy about the MIGRANTS BEHEADING AND EATING OUR PET CATS AND RABBITS! fake news.
Did Jesse and Mother Lament take the bait - so to speak?
I’ll bite.
How is it fake, Shrike?
The videos of them cleaning and cooking seagulls and a park goose were deepfakes? Haitians don’t eat dogmeat?
Or did CNN tell you it was fAkE?
Those immigrants probably never heard of GEICO either. They're practically cavemen.
You're actually defending this? Lol.
No, dipshit. I'm making a joke and pointing out how your ilk views immigrants as subhuman.
Oh. You’re shit at being funny like you are life. Got it. Apologies.
That was mature.
Do you think yourself a mature person? I treat you with the level of respect you deserve. Lol.
*listens to the mating call of the Reason right-wing commentariat loser*
“tu quoque! tu quoque!”
*watches as it flies away in triumph, knowing it has impressed a mate by calling the enemy a hypocrite*
Got enough straw there, dudette?
Still don't know what tu quoque means, huh?
Admit it. You fuck these up on purpose, right?
I don't think it is on purpose. He is just really stupid. And even when you give him a learning opportunity he refuses to do so.
*watches in curious disgust as Reason right-wing commentariat loser engages in three-way with Reason right-wing commentariat loser lovers impressed by the mating call*
Screams everyone else is right wing, cries like a bitch for pointing out how he defends democrats. Lol.
Bookmarking this one for next time you cry about being called a leftist.
"watches in curious disgust"
Like your ex-wife and the judge?
“That was mature.”
Remember when Hamas apologist sarcasmic posted this?
“Whoof Whoof Whoof. Go chase cars on the highway.”
Yeah. He is basically Hitler with his dehumanizing language.
So, yes. You are defending this, because pointing out makes people look anti immigrant.
Why on earth would someone push that story if not to claim that all immigrants are subhuman cavemen who do not belong in society?
No one said they’re “subhuman cavemen”, Sarckles. Just you and your tower of straw.
To be honest, I do consider catching and eating other people's pets, including "wild" animals in city parks, to be a bit crude, and not just "the rich differences of other cultures".
Likewise, but only Sarc used those actual terms he’s now trying to cram in the mouths of everyone else here.
Who said the word all besides your strawman?
Lol
No, Migrants Are Not Eating People’s Cats in Ohio
The viral right-wing smear campaign against Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, is — not surprisingly — baseless
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/haitian-migrants-not-eating-cats-ohio-1235098109/
Rolling Stone > Bratfart
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Oh. If the liberal rag Rolling Stones says it, means the videos aren’t true. Lol. God damn man.
Isn’t this the rag that had pedophiles on its staff?
Here is discussions of citizens from the town buddy.
https://nypost.com/2024/09/09/us-news/all-about-viral-claims-of-haitian-migrants-eating-pets-in-springfield-ohio/
Unlike you Fake News Trump QAnon nutjobs Rolling Stone confirms with a primary source:
https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/springfield-police-say-no-reports-of-pets-stolen-after-viral-social-media-post/3WSIZQNHQVE4NP4TS5BVHBB2PY/
This is the same media saying no, Venezuelan gangs on video raiding apartments wasn't happening right?
Don't believe your lying eyes, Jesse. The Rolling Stone reliably told Shrike it was fake.
It’s the same media that’s in total denial of anything going on in Springfield, Ohio. Why don’t you look for the people complaining about this at the city council meetings? I trust them far more than those rags or you, Bushpig.
turd, the shit-stain of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"...Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)..."
Yet one more lie from the steaming pile of TDS-addled shit turd.
Sarc, this is how you point out lies.
Another, No this isn't happening "news" story.
At least not yet. Give it 6 months for the official "yeah it happened but it's old news and we memory-holed it".
Then "At this point, what difference does it make" and/or "some people did some things".
So you’re using a left wing apologist rag as your defense? Pathetic, Stupid Pedo Bushpig.
"Rolling Stone > Bratfart"
Remember when RS invented a horrifying rape story at UVa based on...absolutely nothing?
Yup, they have credibility to spare...
“Bratfart”.
Haha. I didn’t think you could possibly top “Dickless Cheney” but you did!
You so clever!
On Monday, social media was flooded with posts from prominent conservative lawmakers and commentators claiming Haitian migrants in the town of Springfield, Ohio, were brutalizing and consuming local cats and ducks.
...
The viral allegation is baseless, and the Springfield Police Division told the Springfield News-Sun on Monday that they have received no reports of pets being stolen and eaten.
Link to police included.
This is just more Fake News.
HUNTERBIDENSLAPTOP! BENGHAZI! SLOPPY PULLOUT!
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"...This is just more Fake News. HUNTERBIDENSLAPTOP! BENGHAZI! SLOPPY PULLOUT!"
All of which are true. turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides
"BENGHAZI! SLOPPY PULLOUT!"
Naming these events in all-caps make them fake news... how?
The first is an incident where 4 guys were killed, and another guy almost lost an arm. The second is where 13 Americans and over 100 Afghans were killed, during the surrender of an entire country and untold $ of weapons and material to the most brutal thugs this side of Hamas.
Never change, dipshit, never change.
They are ginned-up fake controversies.
Reagan lets 241 US Marines die in a terrorist attack - no big deal.
Hil-Dog has four embassy officials killed in terrorist attack OMG! OMG!
both of them fall in the "tough shit" category.
Hunters dick pics? You nutjobs howled about those.
The Sloppy Pullout was minor too but it was sloppy and half Donnie's fault for letting 5000 Taliban criminals out.
Shrike knows because democrats said it never happened.
All those citizens testifying to government are liars. Trust only the government.
But shrike isn't a fascist.
Exactly, but Shrike is a Bushpig.
No one denies that Benghazi and the Sloppy Pullout occurred. Or that the Dick Pics and Laptop existed.
But you nutjobs falsely extrapolated your made up bullshit in each case.
You wanted to impeach Biden for Hunters dick pics? That is ALL YOU HAD! The goober from KY (Comer) looked at the emails for FOUR fucking years and found nothing.
And now you crow with false pride that HUNTERS LAPTOP WAS REAL!!!!!!
So what? It is real. You got some dick pics. Good for you.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
You denied the laptop for the longest time, SPBushpig. I believe the claim was something, something, dick pics, something?
Liar.
I joked about the stupid fucking vague e-mails.
BIG GUY 10%.
what a fucking joke to think that had any meaning.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
You
Are
So
Full
Of
Shit
Keep sucking that Biden dick.
"falsely extrapolated your made up bullshit"
What was falsely extrapolated about Benghazi?
Did the complete lack of support for that mission result in the death of Stevens, Smith, Doherty, and Woods?
What is false about an entire country being surrendered to the taliban along with all the US weapons and equipment. The original plan was to maintain our embassy in Afghanistan, what happened to that?
What is false about any of this, dipshit?
Sorta like "Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)"; turd hopes his outright lies get accepted as factual if the slimy pile TDS-addled lefty shit repeats them often enough (IN ALL CAPS, sometimes).
He is a fucking asswipe, ain't he?
“No one denies that Benghazi and the Sloppy Pullout occurred. Or that the Dick Pics and Laptop existed.”
You just did above and do right here every day.
“You wanted to impeach Biden for Hunters dick pics? That is ALL YOU HAD!”
No. That’s all YOU had.
Because you were trying to pretend the bank records, the 200 bank issued Suspicious Activity reports, Wire transfers from China listing Joe Bidens home address, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners he said he didn’t meet, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners advertising Joe as “The Brand”, the “big guy” and “the chairman”, the two whistleblowers testimonies, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe bragging about the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor, email showing Joe’s VP office helping Hunter directly, and Hunter’s statements about having to give his father half his income, all confirmed by the laptop… didn’t exist.
You denied it, you lying POS
"They are ginned-up fake controversies."
Biden's humiliating Afghanistan exit was far more real than the SECOND INSURRECTION BY RIGHTWING EXTREMISTS you warned us would happen on 9 / 18 / 2021.
Wrong place
SECOND INSURRECTION BY RIGHTWING EXTREMISTS
How many times was AOC killed during that one?
turd, the TDS-addled shitstain of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Ginned up fake controversies = real-life fuckups by your team that make them look bad.
“Reagan lets 241 US Marines die in a terrorist attack – no big deal.”
Glad you’re stretching back to 1983 for your both sides-ing, but of course this was a horrendous fuckup on the part of the Reagan admin, which we paid for later.
I wonder if we are ever going to pay for Obama/Biden’s fuckups?
Do you ever wonder if Joe’s cowardice in AFG emboldened Putin to invade Ukraine, or Hamas to massacre Jews last year? In Butplug world there is no connection between events, they just happen in disintegrated chunks that coincide with US Presidential terms.
Fuck the Middle East. That's my plan.
There won't be peace there until the Sun implodes into a dwarf.
Now, when busted for his continued lying, he attempts deflection, the asshole.
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
“Fuck the Middle East. That’s my plan.”
Can you and sarc get together and google the word "plan" please?
And yet he's so detailed when he's abducting children.
“Fuck the Middle East.”
A Billy Milano fan, I see.
"half Donnie’s fault for letting 5000 Taliban criminals out."
Yes, the Abbey Gate suicide bomber was actually released when Trump let the Taliban overrun the prison where he was held - oh wait, this happened during Joe's pullout.
We are still awaiting the release of SPB's head from his ass.
Don't hold your breath.
“Hil-Dog has four embassy officials killed”
It’s not surprising that your factual knowledge of this event comes up short. You truly are the dumbest of the dumbfucks posting here. In a forum that includes sarcjeff, windycity "attorney" and mtrueman, that's an achievement.
Didn't Obama send a guy to jail over a "movie" that nobody saw that he and Hillary blamed the entire incident on despite zero evidence existing of it even being seen by a single person involved
Fake news!!!
How is it fake, Shrike?
"Were they carrying membership cards? QED." - Elizabeth Nolan Brown
Fair.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
I just hope Trump doesn’t try to pedestal a Gov-Gun THEFT agenda.
The lefts does nothing but peddles Constitutionally-Illegal MORE THEFT agenda’s.
Don’t need anymore than one P.O.S. criminal-mentality promising gangland politics.
"DOJ Backs Tenants in Case Alleging Price-Fixing by Big Landlords and a Real Estate Tech Company"
[...]
"The U.S. Department of Justice late Wednesday stepped into a massive antitrust lawsuit filed by dozens of tenants who are accusing a tech company’s apartment software of helping landlords collude to inflate rents..."
https://www.propublica.org/article/doj-backs-tenants-price-fixing-case-big-landlords-real-estate-tech
Actually, no. They have a DB showing the rents of what other, similar units are getting.
Pretty sure there's an A1 angle in there.
Wonder what they think of used car dealers and the NADA book.
They could just do what my landlords used to do. Mindlessly raise the rent 20% every year until I move out. They now know how much the unit is worth. Whatever they were asking for minus the cost to move.
Kinda like how the rental unit was priced when the landlord bought it: The highest price the seller could get.
Providing better information to consumers and then pricing rents after interpreting said information is price-fixing something something.
Cackle and deflect.
Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii)—then an actual Democrat vs. a Fox News talking head....
I'm not sure what the "actual" is about. Gabbard quite publicly dropped her affiliation with the Democrats and became an independent (remember when Reason used to like those?). Of course, I'd ask exactly what positions has Gabbard actually changed that she's now just a "Fox News talking head" (By the way, does that moniker now apply to Kennedy? Kmele Foster? Matt Welch?). You might want to excuse yourself to the ladies, room, Liz. Your mask seems to be slipping.
Tulsi found herself a nice gig at Russia Today. Nothing screams DONNIE CULT like a few million rubles from Pappy Vlad.
More lies from turd. turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
So, Russian Collusion: Part 896. You know, shreike, that's f**king moronic, even for you. And, considering that she's a currently serving Army reserve officer, vile.
It is pathetic, even for Shrike. Ever since the Open Society shit canned him, he’s been going further and further into total retardity.
She was vocal in support of Russian ally Assad and his cleansing of Syria - even backing him up that his enemies were the real terrorists. Vlad appreciated her support of Assad in defiance of NATO.
She is now firmly in the anti-NATO Russian camp.
turd, the shit-stain of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
"the 80's called for their foreign policy back"
-Tulsi Gabbard
No, you're just now a Bushpig chicken-hawk.
She is now firmly in the anti-NATO Russian camp.
You can be anti-NATO without being pro-Putin, but of course a neocon bushpig warmonger like you wouldn't admit that.
Say, what's it like hanging out with Dick Cheney now? Whatever you do, don't go hunting with him.
Remember when he claimed he hated them before asking Dick to treat him the way he treats 4 year old boys?
Indeed, Trump’s cozy relationship with Russia was proven conclusively when he was caught on a hot mic describing his increased flexibility after the election.
that fucking reset button T carried over there & embarrassed himself with too what a maroon.
"The 80's called and want their foreign policy back"
That was DJT right?
Just how fucking stupid can you get?
>>Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii)—then an actual Democrat vs. a Fox News talking head
meow.
"Alright ladies, grease up and get out there fightin'"
The judeocidal terror supporting hamassholes at Columbia are at it again. And the other Ivies as well. What a loathesome lot of people.
Came to read AT's vigorous defense of the cops. Nothing - disappointed...
>>reminded voters of all the sexual assault and harassment allegations against him, which is seemingly not in his best interest.
tell your readers you don't get T w/o telling them.
>>a clinical Associated Press write-up
does not exist if written this century.
>>"This is the Harris-Walz media strategy in a nutshell: Avoid the press at all costs, even when asked questions that should be layups," argues The New Republic.
the entire paragraph after this ^ is so stupid I can't imagine New Republic is being truthful in naivete and not gaslighting the fuck out of their 73 readers
>>Trump has had a bad August
not August anymore.
What was so bad about August? Did somebody try to kill him or something?
no it was a staged stunt
/actual liberals out there who believe this
can't write has had a bad August in September. not if an editor is around anyway
the world feels a little cleaner with the Cheneys unmasked.
it's because President Biden employed the same media strategy in his reelection campaign. That didn't work out so well for him
????
Seems to have actually worked out pretty well for him. But, of course, if your primary concern in a Presidential election is the outcome of a candidate's media strategy for themselves or their campaign, you're leaning pretty hard on the Statism to begin with.
>>Alvin Bragg ... James Carlson, a Brooklyn lawyer and activist ... charges of arson and criminal mischief ... he ignited an Israeli flag with a lighter and destroyed a camera in jail.
James was killing it until he broke government property.
>>The first private spacewalk is slated to happen over the next few days
~Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
~~I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Would it now be named LR?
good question.
reminded voters of all the sexual assault and harassment allegations against him, which is seemingly not in his best interest.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe polls have shown that each progressively ramped up prosecution of Trump actually helped him with voters, not hurt him, because voters can see right through this shit.
The Biden/Harris regime provides reeducation materials for J6 prisoners to prevent any backsliding.
https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1833232980401394016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1833232980401394016%7Ctwgr%5E3540de17ca7803f972ec77bc9682b832221358c2%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frevolver.news%2Fnewsfeed%2F
"read a clinical Associated Press write-up of the conference"
Same AP that completely misquoted JD Vance intentionally?
DID YOU HEAR WHAT TRUMP SAID?!?!?!?!
I'll watch the debate tonight simply because I need a few laughs.
Harris, as of this week, has populated her website with actual policy positions. We'll see now whether she can actually answer for them.
ha ha. Imagine thinking that she is somehow in charge of her campaign or her administration's plans and positions . Lol. LMAO even.
"Harris, as of this week, has populated her website with actual policy positions."
I've read them. in detail. repeatedly. they are not, as you claim, "policy positions". they are vague platitudes. & many of those don't hold up to even casual scrutiny. claiming CTC and EITC to be tax cuts rather than subsidy programs administered via taxation authorities is quite the stretch.