Leave U.S. Steel Alone
Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, and J.D. Vance agree that U.S. Steel needs to be controlled from Washington. They are all wrong.

On Monday, Vice President Kamala Harris became the latest prominent political figure to agree that the federal government ought to block the sale of U.S. Steel to a Japanese competitor.
On Wednesday, reports surfaced that President Joe Biden is ready to do exactly that. Biden "is preparing to announce that he will formally block Nippon Steel's proposed $14.9 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel," The Washington Post reported, citing a number of anonymous sources.
If Biden moves to block Nippon's purchase, he'll likely be applauded by former president Donald Trump and Trump's running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance (R–Ohio), both of whom have called for the Biden administration to prevent the deal from going through. Vance has been particularly vocal about this issue since U.S. Steel announced that it would be acquired by Nippon Steel last year. (In a bit of circular authoritarian logic, he's even asked the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate whether the deal could be blocked because U.S. Steel's shareholders may not have been adequately scared of the federal government's ability to block the deal.)
In short, the four most prominent politicians in the country (sorry, Tim Walz) agree: U.S. Steel, a private company, should not be allowed to conduct a transaction with another private company unless the federal government agrees.
This is absurd—particularly because the deal is obviously in the best interest of U.S. Steel.
"We'll admit that the competition for the dumbest economic policy is fierce these days—with prices controls on food, a 10% across-the-board tariff, and national rent control on the table," opined The Wall Street Journal's editorial board this week. "But opposition to the Nippon deal deserves careful consideration for this distinct dishonor given the deal's manifest benefits and nonexistent harm."
Indeed, Nippon's plan to buy U.S. Steel gives the legacy steelmaker something that Trump's tariffs and Biden's blather about blue-collar jobs never could: A chance to actually become more competitive in the global marketplace. Among other things, Nippon has promised to invest $2.7 billion in revamping U.S. Steel's plants.
"Nippon Steel's investment would help revitalize U.S. steel manufacturing," the Journal notes. "But these days America appears to be led by a confederacy of economic dunces."
It's correct to assume incompetence rather than malice when government officials demonstrate economic illiteracy, but evidence suggests that's not the case here. Cleveland-Cliffs, an Ohio-based steelmaker (hence Vance's interest), lost out to Nippon in the bidding war to purchase U.S. Steel. Since then, it has been leading the effort to get the government to block the deal over completely imaginary national security concerns.
Unsurprisingly, Cleveland-Cliffs reportedly anticipates being able to buy U.S. Steel on the cheap if the deal with Nippon is blocked. The company's CEO, Lourenco Goncalves, argues that the Nippon deal should be blocked simply because "Japan is not a friend" of the United States.
What? This is naked cronyism wrapped in nonsensical xenophobia: Japan is one of America's closest allies, and the Biden administration has worked to tighten that bond.
The political opposition to the U.S. Steel/Nippon deal is a perfect example of why concentrating more economic power in Washington, D.C., is a terrible idea. Politicians seeking to create more opportunities for American workers should be celebrating this major foreign investment in domestic manufacturing. Instead, the levers of power are being manipulated by lobbyists and special interests to do the opposite—in pursuit of policies that will leave U.S. Steel and its employees worse off.
The executives and shareholders of U.S. Steel are the ones who have the best interests of U.S. Steel in mind. But if the Post's reporting is correct, the Biden administration is about to overrule their judgment in the interest of political pandering and crony capitalism. That's gross.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"US Steel must remain all-American to the end!"
Even if the end is next year.
Only State controlled companies should be barred,like China,Russia and Saudi Arabia
how is the NFL supposed to tweet about its Friday night game in Brazil?
The company's CEO, Lourenco Goncalves, argues that the Nippon deal should be blocked simply because "Japan is not a friend" of the United States.
So is this CEO a Brazilian?
Crony capitalism? It's just cronyism. Capitalism has nothing to do with it.
"Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, and J.D. Vance agree that U.S. Steel needs to be controlled from Washington."
The democrats and republicans can't control what goes on in DC.
So, how are they going to "control" a large corporation?
You familiar with Obamacare, Medicare, NASA and Boeing, Detroit bailouts ....?
Yeah, you know you know.
Trump has been given poor advice from RINOs and Vance knows better but doesn't want to disagree at this point.I wish he would have a heart to heart with The Don.
But what if Nippon puts that great steel industry expert, Hunter Biden, on its payroll as a high paid consultant?
GreaseOil the skids, so to speak?Japan is one of America's closest allies
Two points:
1): Governments (and consequentially, countries) live on the timescales that your friends become your enemies. It doesn't have to happen tomorrow, but to pretend that it will never happen is to stirp all agency from people and their decision makings.
2): Countries (and consequentially, governments) should NEVER outsource the making of durable goods (which is what US Steel does) when they don't have to, regardless of who benefits (friend or foe, in this case). The US, as a country, has the resources, manpower, and land to keep manufacturing here. That is sufficient reason to block the deal.
Countries (and consequentially, governments) should NEVER outsource the making of durable goods (which is what US Steel does) when they don’t have to, regardless of who benefits.
So every country needs to manufacturer its own airplanes? Please don't tell Boeing, they have enough problems.
International trade has driven increased prosperity for centuries.
So every country needs to manufacturer its own airplanes?
The US, as a country, has the resources, manpower, and land to keep manufacturing here.
Not every country is as lucky as the US, which is tough fucking titties for them, but we are lucky, and squandering that advantage is retarded.
So how will Biden stop the sale? Another unconstitutional executive action?
The 25th Amendment seems ripe for use.
Not gonna happen -
If she takes over, she will actually have policies; on the record and all that jazz.
Well that's some wild twisting of the actual subject.
Japan is trying to buy a US Steel Company NOT just the steel itself.
American's should own American companies. It's as simple as that.
The USA is not for Sale.
We are part of a Global Economy.
It’s September 5th, EST.
There's a difference between a Product and a piece of a nation.
The USA is not for Sale
That's not the same thing as private US companies being for sale. So much for all your liberty bullshit. No foreign capital investment permitted - and of course in the inevitable response, US investors would be prohibited by other countries from investing in their companies. Stock market crashes as foreign shareholders have to liquidate their holdings. US companies that would be solvent when partnering with a foreign firm that has some international commercial advantages over US firms go bankrupt. Or should the US government bail them out?
Telling shareholders or owners who they're allowed to sell to is not exactly a free market or capitalism.
Foreign countries do limit Americans from buying-up their nations natural resources. Because...... It's just like putting an entire nation up for sale. If Japan wants to sell their nation to the USA they can run the proper government channels to *end* their entire nation.
Nations do not exist on a free-market principle.
They get conquered and taken over.
Because only idiots or haters of their country want it "up for sale".
I actually agree that certain industries with national security implications remain in American hands. Steel is certainly one of them.