60 Percent of Voters Want Kamala Harris To Abandon Bidenonomics
A new survey suggests that neither Harris nor Donald Trump have won over a majority of voters with their respective economic visions.

A new survey suggests that neither former President Donald Trump nor Vice President Kamala Harris has won over a majority of voters with their economic proposals. The results also suggest that most voters wish Harris would throw out her boss's policies altogether.
An August poll by the Financial Times and the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business gauged 1,001 registered voters' feelings about the top two presidential candidates and their respective handling of the economy in the next term. Of the respondents, 45 percent identified as or "leaned" Democrat, while 41 percent identified as or "leaned" Republican.
The Financial Times led its coverage by noting that Harris had notched a noticeable improvement over President Joe Biden. "More Americans trust Kamala Harris to handle the US economy than Donald Trump, according to a new poll that marks a sharp change in voter sentiment following President Joe Biden's withdrawal from the White House race," write Lauren Fedor and Eva Xiao.
Forty-one percent of surveyed voters prefer Trump as a steward of the economy, numbers identical to those captured in June and July and nearly unchanged since February. But 42 percent chose Harris, marking a distinct improvement over Biden, who only won over 35 percent of respondents in the July poll. (Biden withdrew from the race later that month.)
Notably, neither major party candidate got anywhere close to a majority, and 10 percent of respondents said they trusted neither candidate. The results also indicate that voters aren't even particularly confident in Harris's economic vision: 42 percent said that a Trump victory in November would leave them financially "better off," while only 33 percent said the same of Harris.
But perhaps the most jarring result is that six out of every 10 voters polled said Harris should scrap Bidenomics altogether, with 38 percent saying she should "take a completely different approach from Joe Biden's economic policies" and another 23 percent saying she should "make major changes."
"The poll is good news for previously-anxious Democrats, but their worries aren't over because voters still see themselves better off with Trump as president, and most voters think of their interests first and grand policy questions second," Erik Gordon, a professor at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, told the Financial Times.
No wonder: Consumer prices have gone up since Biden entered office in January 2021; in that time, the average family of four's monthly costs have gone up over $1,000, and mortgage rates are more than twice as high. Much of this owes to inflation, which despite cooling in recent months has dogged Biden for much of his presidency, reaching a 40-year high of 9.1 percent in July 2022.
While inflation is complex and its causes are multifaceted, government spending is a big driver, and in the first three years and five months of his term, Biden oversaw a $6 trillion increase to the debt held by the public, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
In fairness, it's not like Trump would be much better: In the same amount of time that Biden added $6 trillion to the publicly-held debt, Trump added $5.9 trillion. And the GOP's platform is full of measures like increasing tariffs and refusing to lay a glove on ballooning entitlements like Social Security and Medicare—policies that will only exacerbate inflation and push deficits further higher.
Still, Harris is unlikely to repudiate Biden's policies. "They've been aligned for the last three-and-a-half years. There's not been any daylight," White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Monday, regarding potential policy differences between Biden and Harris. "She's going to build on the successes that they've had."
And yet Harris may be able to escape the stigma of Bidenomics unscathed: A Morning Consult poll conducted in late July—just days after Biden left the race—found that voters didn't blame the vice president for inflation to the same extent as they had blamed Biden, with Harris enjoying an 8-point advantage over her boss.
Just as polling suggests that Americans largely favor free trade, a similar portion of voters wish for Harris to jettison the current administration's inflationary economic policies for something different. Sadly, no matter which major party's candidate wins in November, it's unlikely that the U.S. will get its fiscal house in order anytime soon.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Still, Harris is unlikely to repudiate Biden's policies.
Why not? Kamalamadingdong is like Trump in that neither one really has any core convictions.
First she was a cop, then she was all "defund the police", now she's a cop again.
First she wanted Medicare for All, now she says "Umm, maybe not".
First she wanted to throw potheads in jail, then she favored legal medical pot, then she wanted full legalization, but now she's a cop again so who knows what she will do with the War on Drugs now.
So I can easily see KamKam going either way, either throwing Biden under the bus and saying "he was too centrist, let's go full-on progressive", or I can see her saying "Bidenomics was about right because Trump is just too extreeeeeme". Who knows?
It’ll be the first one.
First one what?
Yeah, you hate Trump because he doesn’t believe in anything.
You’re so tiresome.
Every poll I've seen since Harris coronation oversamples Democrats. It's a real headscratcher.
Prove it. Provide links to the sample breakdowns or hush up.
>>a similar portion of voters wish for Harris to jettison the current administration's inflationary economic policies for something different
something even more communist?
Ha! You little weirdos always going on about communist this and communist that without even knowing what communism is. You're sad little couch humpers.
"60 Percent of Voters Want Kamala Harris To Abandon Bidenonomics.'
Oh, come on now.
Who doesn't like inflation, higher taxes and unemployment?
Like Democrats worry about any of those things. What really matters is unlimited unemployment checks, eviction bans, and magical student loan cancellation.
Yep. If she wins, look for a $1000 monthly check in the mail for each member of your household. And if you’re from one of team blue’s favorite identity groups, you’ll get a $2000 check each month.
What's the current inflation rate? When did taxes go up? What's the current unemployment rate? Either pony up some proof of your wild claims or hush up.
I have to wonder how many of the people surveyed could really even fix on what is Biden economic policy and how it might differ from Trump's. What I do see is that the economy seems relatively good. Inflation is going in the right direction, down. News from the stock market was pretty scary last week but it appears more a correction that a precursor to recession. At this point I rather leave it in Harris's hands and count on a Republican controlled Senate to check her on spending. Trump took the good economy he was handed and ran it into a recession. He did it once and I suspect he could do it again.
D-
Trump "ran it into a recession"?
Trump made states shut down? Blue states for over a year?
You realize THAT is the extent of the "recession", right?
Trumps made numerous economic errors in his Presidency. Signed an unneeded tax cut, instituted poorly designed tariffs, and finally provided no real leadership in the pandemic. Mostly he was just hoping the Covid19 would go away. There is nothing to suggest he will do anything more that trash the economy as second time.
You’re extra retarded today.
“Tax cuts bad!”
The 2017 cut was bad. It was unnecessary as the economy was humming along well, the tax cut required borrowing increasing the debt and it failed to do what Republicans said it would do create jobs. The 2017 Tax Cut was primarily a giveaway to the wealth Republican donors.
Dude, all tax cuts are good. Doesn’t matter if they aren’t accompanied by cuts in spending.
Look at it this way. Republicans cut taxes which resulted in less revenue. But Democrats wouldn’t let them cut spending. The delta between spending and revenue created an increase in the budget deficit. But it wasn’t the fault of the Republicans. It was all the fault of the Democrats.
Put it into a family perspective. Husband quits a side hustle that was earning extra cash, but the wife refuses to quit buying bullshit at the Dollar Store. The result is that the household budget goes negative. Who is to blame? Dude for cutting income, or the bitch for spending money? Obviously it’s all the bitch’s fault.
^ Look at the two retards here.
Totes libertarian Sarc advocating for higher federal taxes.
Pour Sarc. Probably about a quart every day.
More like refuses to quit buying bullshit at Sephora and Whole Foods.
Don't forget signing the CARES Act which set the stage for inflation by dramatically increasing the money supply while the supply of goods and services was being cut due to lockdowns.
Oh yeah, presidents are only responsible for signing laws when their party wrote the law and they don't face a veto-proof majority. Hurr durr.
You are a complete idiot. There is no such thing as an unneeded tax cut. We should repeal the 16th amendment, and cut government. Starve the beast.
You realize Red State GDPs fell by more than Blue State GDPs, right? Or are you just pulling phony claims out of your butt?
Parody.
For a different view of tariffs among other things.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/big-question-how-are-ukraine-stakeholders-cia-us-intel-community-going-stop-donald-trump
With the 2024 election rapidly coming, it is worth revisiting the actual tariff outcome to American consumers in order to dispel the popular myths about tariffs raising prices here at home.
CPA – […] Since the Section 301 tariffs were imposed, the share of imports from China has steadily declined from 21.6% in 2017 the year prior to the tariffs to 16.5%, a decline of 5.1%. No other country has lost as much share of total U.S. import penetration over the past five years.
In terms of total import value, Mexico gained the most from the tariffs, adding $110.8 billion. Vietnam gained the second most in import value by $78.4 billion and by far gained the most of total share of U.S. imports. In 2017, Vietnam accounted for about 2% of U.S. imports at $46.5 billion. In 2022, the U.S. imported $127.5 billion in goods from Vietnam, and the share of the total nearly doubled to 3.9%. Other countries in Southeast Asia such as Thailand, Cambodia, and Indonesia all saw significant increases in their value of imports by the U.S. (read more)
This might be the cited data you want to bookmark for later reference.
It was the Fourth Quarter of 2019…..
Right before the pandemic would hit a few months later, despite two years of doomsayer predictions from Wall Street’s professional punditry, all of them said Trump’s 2017 steel and aluminum tariffs on China, Canada and the EU would create massive inflation – it just wasn’t happening!
Overall, year-over-year inflation was hovering around 1.7 percent [Table-A BLS]; yup, that was our inflation rate. The rate in the latter half of 2019 was firmed up with less month-over-month fluctuation, and the rate basically remained consistent. [See Below] The U.S. economy was on a smooth glide path, strong, stable, and Main Street was growing with MAGAnomics at work.
A couple of important points.
First, unleashing the energy sector to drive down overall costs to consumers, and industry outputs was a key part of President Trump’s America First MAGAnomic initiative. Lower energy prices help the worker economy, middle class and average American more than any other sector.
Which brings us to the second important point. Notice how food prices had very low year-over-year inflation – 0.5 percent. That is a combination of two key issues: low energy costs, and the fracturing of Big Ag’s hold on the farm production and the export dynamic:
(BLS) […] The index for food at home declined for the third month in a row, falling 0.2 percent. The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs decreased 0.7 percent in August as the index for eggs fell 2.6 percent. The index for fruits and vegetables, which rose in July, fell 0.5 percent in August; the index for fresh fruits declined 1.4 percent, but the index for fresh vegetables rose 0.4 percent. The index for cereals and bakery products fell 0.3 percent in August after rising 0.3 percent in July. (link)
For the previous twenty years, food prices had been increasingly controlled by Big Ag, and not by normal supply and demand. The commodity market became a ‘controlled market’. U.S. food outputs (farm production) was controlled and exported to keep the U.S. consumer paying optimal prices.
President Trump’s trade reset was disrupting this process. As farm products were less exported, the cost of the food in our supermarket became reconnected to a ‘more normal’ supply and demand cycle. Food prices dropped, and our pantry costs were lowered.
Nobody really knows what her policies are, as they have yet to be stated.
Harris will not give any interviews or press conferences, but based on the past few years, I assume her policies will be similar to those of Biden's current handlers. Her webpage doesn't have any policy positions. Her spokespersons aren't really clear on her policies either.
She did, at a rally, endorse Trump's proposal to cease taxing tips, so there is that. Biden said he agrees with that as well, but since they actually instructed the IRS to crack down on unreported tips, I suspect neither are serious about their 180 flip on taxes. She also now agrees the border is not closed but pretends she has had no control over that issue over the past 3 years
Newsweek did a glowing tongue-bath article on Harris. She refused to be interviewed for the piece, but that didn't stop them from praising her achievements. From what I've seen, her top 3 achievements are 1) First VP to visit a Planned Parenthood clinic; 2) had the most tie-breaking votes in the Senate; and 3) I can't remember what #3 was but it must have been amazing.
It's amazing to me that the media has practically forgotten about Biden. He had only a couple of "events" last week before heading back to the beach; one was hosting a sports team, the other a phone call. He did have one soft-ball pre-recorded interview in which he accused Trump of being KKK and almost encouraging someone to take another shot at him.
Until 3 weeks ago, everyone agreed that Harris lacks intelligence and was too unpopular to be a serious contender for President. Suddenly the media is declaring her the most amazing candidate ever to be a Democrat nominee for President. Her well-known cackle and word-salad comments are now described as "joy". Harris participated in no primaries and no one voted for her as Democrat Presidential nominee, but instead she has been crowned and the media just cheers.
Is anyone really going to fall for this and vote for her?
I remember when Harris was Joe’s anti impeachment insurance. Like a month ago.
They’re hoping she can just win on “Joy”, like Obama did with “Hope and Change”. So don’t expect to hear much of anything from her except “I can feel the joy!”
Yes, democrats. The really dumb ones, and the really Marxist true believers. I have a Cousin who is the former, and an aunt who is the latter.
Interesting how Lancaster leaves out that nowhere does the poll define the term "Bidenomics," let alone ask in which direction respondents would like Harris to depart from it.
And it's especially interesting he doesn't mention the fact that more respondents considered "large corporations taking advantage of inflation" to be responsible for price rises than "Democratic policies."
Typical Reason dishonesty.
Kamala has policies?
Did she put some on her website over the weekend?
Wait, I'm being told she has "joy."
That's what she gave to Willie.
Well, if I were her I would make sure I had insurance policies.
Oh, goodie! Another opinion poll blah blah blah voters want mumble mumble mumble. I suppose that polls come out every week and since there's no real news and no real debates about real issues going on the pundits have to comment about what some pollster thinks some people think. Change a few words in the questions asked and the results shift ten points either way. There has never been an opinion poll in history that reliably predicted the outcome of an election, but that doesn't prevent advertisers from relying on advertising or politicians from relying on opinion polls. Fourteen percent in this poll appear to be the "swing voters" and it's probably even narrower in the battleground states, but millions of dollars will be spent by the parties trying to react to the most recent polls and swing the balance with no evidence whatsoever that it will help them win in November.
Is this poll assuming that the average voter is in any way capable of analyzing an "economic vision?"
STOP SPENDING!!!
It’s actually nice to see the majority of people aren’t buying into the MMT BS.
Next up they just might learn that in the USA the ‘government’ is NOT suppose to be planning the economy.
What percentage of Americans don't understand that tariffs on Chinese goods are taxes on them, not on China?
I'd guess the number is depressingly low, and even lower for Trump supporters.
Well, you just do what the ZeroHedge people do - if tariffs mean that consumers shift their purchases to other countries, then the consumers aren't taxed by the tariffs you see! Trump Wins and SUCK IT, LOLBERTARIAN LOSERS!
But, of course, what this means is, the consumers are paying more, because the tariffs caused them to shift their consumption to a higher-priced source of the same good (or a substitute). How do I know it's higher-priced? Because if it wasn't, then consumers would have picked that source even without tariffs.
So EITHER the consumers are harmed by paying more via tariffs, or they are harmed by paying more from an alternate higher-priced source. But in Trump World (and also in Biden World), this is considered a win! Yay for harming consumers by forcing them to become more 'patriotic' by not buying crap from CHAY-NA!
But, of course, what this means is, the consumers are paying more, because the tariffs caused them to shift their consumption to a higher-priced source of the same good (or a substitute). How do I know it’s higher-priced? Because if it wasn’t, then consumers would have picked that source even without tariffs.
Good observation.
The point of protectionist tariffs is not revenue. The point is to change behavior. Ideally protectionist tariffs bring in no revenue at all by changing how the supply chain works. Thing is, if that other way was cheaper people would have already used it.
So no matter how you slice it, protectionist tariffs increase prices, even for people who avoid the tariffs.
You're wrong. They are not "taxes on them".
They are taxes they pay on Chinese goods.
JUST like the taxes they pay on US goods.
I swear if you aren't trying to deceive something you'd have nothing to say.
Pedant. Pedant. Pedant pedant pedant pedant pedaaaaaaaaaant, pedadidadant.
apologies to Henry Mancini
Instead of "on", what about "paid by"?
95% of voters want Kamala Harris to establish a policy position.
99% of voters want her to not sound like a gibbering retard whenever she opens her mouth.
This is an example people actually submitting to be gaslit. Maybe there’s a term for it. Whatever it is, it describes the modern American left.
I remember this hilarious fact check a few years ago that claimed Biden saying “end of quote” in a statement wasn’t him reading off a teleprompter. Why, he was merely quoting someone else. They carried on this unfathomable self deception on Biden for the better part of 3 years. They KNEW Biden was a human vegetable. They knew him slurring random nonsensical words, wandering off the stage, misnaming people right front of his eyes, and stumbling on stairs had only one explanation.
But they couldn’t have the right win. So they desperately clung onto the narrative that plain view evidence of Biden’s decline was “cheap fake” by the right. As recently as this summer, they were telling us that Biden was sharp as a tack.
Chemjeff says his lefty friends are excited about Kamala. Of course they are. Because even though every evidence suggests that she’s a garden variety leftist who won’t stray far from Bidenomics, they HAVE to delude themselves into believing that Kamala is a dramatic departure from the stale Joe Biden, a fresh face. She’s joyful! She’s vivacious! She has a great idea about not taxing tips that even MAGA supports! Her commie VP is America’s aw shucks dad!
Why do they bother positing “she should break away from Biden”? They know she won’t. But they have to believe in the fantasy that she will.
Vice President Kamala Harris is part of the Biden regime. She as Vice President sits as the tie casting vote in the senate and I believe that she has cast the most tie-breaking votes in history.
Vice President Kamala Harris has a political past and political record. She however does not have any official positions that would allow an independent such as myself to read. There appears to be a concerted effort to obfuscate her positions so she can pretend to hold many different positions depending on the audience.
I am not in favor of another Trump presidency, but honestly I fear a Kamala Harris presidency much more. I simply can't stomach either of these fools so will vote for someone else who admittedly will not win.
How foolish can voters be to believe that Vice President Kamala Harris will be any different from her positions from her previous presidential campaign or while she has been Vice President? The voters are being propagandized to a extreme degree.
My advice is for voters to pick a third party candidate of their choice and skip both major party candidates. The only thing that will save our representative democracy is fracture both the Democrat and Republican parties into multiple smaller parties.
Our representative democracy will not be saved by an anti-democratically anointed "Manchurian Candidate" who 6 weeks ago led the unfavorable race and now is the darling of the sycophantic and fawning corporate propaganda machine.
I may be repulsed by Former President Donald Trump, however if he was elected, the corporate propaganda machine would keep him in check with a constant barrage of attacks of which a few might actually be true, but like before were often dishonest reporting or outright fabrications or lies.
As the current evidence of the corporate propaganda machine gaslighting the voters, it is evident that the corporate propaganda machine will continue their sycophantic propaganda in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris and bury any unfavorable news. This is a much more dangerous scenario for personal liberties, but isn't that the point for Marxists where equal opportunity is disfavored in favor of equal outcomes (except the leaders get more of course). Less for thee and more for me.
"...My advice is for voters to pick a third party candidate of their choice and skip both major party candidates..."
Yes, let TDS-addled shits scare you into voting for those who will never be elected, rather than voting for the best of the two realistic candidates, and one who, by any measure, is the best POTUS the US has had for 100 years.
FOAD, UGD.
"60 Percent of Voters Want Kamala Harris To Abandon Bidenonomics"
That's got to be at least 50% higher than the columnists at Reason.
If a representative number of voters were given a choice, for the job Kamala is best qualified, that is, as President or as a Walmart greeter, the voters would choose the later.