Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Venezuela

Maduro's Tightening Grip

Plus: NYC's crazy rent control, goths under attack in El Paso, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 8.9.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Venezuelan protesters demonstrating after election | David Canales/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
(David Canales/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

What's happening in Venezuela? Following Venezuela's presidential election a week and a half ago, President Nicolás Maduro's camp—which the opposition says was squarely defeated, a fact backed up by substantial documentation—has yet to release the results it promised to prove its claimed "victory."

"At CNN's request, several experts analyzed the results offered by both the government-aligned National Electoral Council of Venezuela (CNE) and the opposition platform Comando Con Venezuela," reports the outlet. "The experts conclude that the numbers that appear to portray Maduro as the winner are statistically improbable. Data released by the team of opposition presidential candidate Edmundo González Urrutia match 'mathematically and statistically,' the experts say." (This point was also made by guests Daniel Di Martino and César Báez on an episode of my show, Just Asking Questions, that will be released next week.)

In response to his defeat, Maduro has not only refused to release the results his team promised but has also ordered internet providers to block access to X for the next 10 days. Venezuelan activists who want the rest of the world to see Maduro's profound corruption, are issuing messages of resistance: "Use X. Download VPN. Share posts on X. Communicate on Whatsapp. Don't leave chats," writes journalist Orlando Avendaño (in Spanish) on X. "Let us overcome the totalitarian siege. Today more than ever, to succeed, it is essential to be informed."

Maduro is also rounding up journalists, activists, and politicians who oppose him. (A tactic he has used before.) María Oropeza, an organizer for the opposition campaign, was detained on Tuesday. Venezuela's Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar, or its counterintelligence military agency, posted a menacing video to its official Instagram showing Oropeza being rounded up and thrown in prison. Her mother, meanwhile, is pleading for information about her daughter's location.

She's not the only one. Opponents of the regime keep getting disappeared. Over 22 people have been killed so far in demonstrations since the election results were announced, and an estimated 2,000 people have been jailed.

Yet some leftists in the West keep covering for Maduro, even as the regime shows exactly who they are and the extent to which they will go to remain in power—even when that contradicts the overwhelming will of the people. Eighty-one percent of voters made their way to the polls, possibly emboldened by hopes that the opposition could be successful in unseating the tyrant Maduro.


Scenes from New York: I woke up mad about rent control.

Can you imagine paying $87.25 per month for rent, while the apartments above/below you go for $3,800, $4,800, & $5,200 (for the very top floor)? This is a particularly egregious example, but holy shit. New York's rent control laws are a BIG part of why this city is so expensive. https://t.co/QkJgwxHviE

— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) August 9, 2024


QUICK HITS

  • One big ask for regular readers of Roundup: Please give my show, cohosted with Zach Weissmueller, a watch/listen. It can be on your morning commute. It can be while you're vacuuming your house. It can be while you're suffering through a run. We're really proud of our most recent episode with Nate Silver, the guy who founded FiveThirtyEight and just wrote On the Edge, a book about risk taking in all its forms. Also: send me a DM with guest suggestions, if you have 'em. We live to serve.

  • "Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City President Jeffrey Schmid signaled he's not ready to support a reduction in interest rates with inflation above target and the labor market still healthy despite some cooling," reports Bloomberg.
  • Cringe political headlines from The New York Times: "Harris Used to Worry About Laughing. Now Joy Is Fueling Her Campaign."
  • "Retailers are fueling a summer rush of imports to the United States this year as companies guard against a potential strike by port workers and ongoing shipping disruptions from attacks in the Red Sea ahead of a shortened holiday shopping season," reports Reuters.
  • A public middle school in El Paso, Texas, has chosen to ban wearing all-black clothing, saying that it is "associated with depression and mental health issues."
  • Yes:

Do people who tweet like this prefer to live in a monarchy? I wouldn't find these tweets odd in Syria or Saudi Arabia. Kind of odd in a country born on dissent and debate. https://t.co/xrbn630UVR

— Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) August 9, 2024

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: California's Unions Lost Their Long Battle Against Uber and Lyft

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

VenezuelaNicolas MaduroCorruptionElectionsVotingSocialismAuthoritarianismCampaigns/ElectionsPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (293)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    Jeff's favored authoritarian government.

    UK begins arrests of Britons whi dare stand up to the immigration desired of the Labour party.

    They continue to threaten online posts. They have been clearing out jails to make room to arrest protestors. 26 have now been arrested including a sentence of 26 months for someone, checks notes, who shouted at the police.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-authorities-now-arresting-people-posting-inaccurate-information-social-media

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

      Well what do you expect from a dictator like Maduro?

      Oh.

      1. Ron   10 months ago

        and Maduro learned his techniques from U.S. democrats

    2. Nardz   10 months ago

      https://x.com/upstatefederlst/status/1821776012499193928?t=u0YiaWQtsSQihsPbla0QaQ&s=19

      They just cancelled a 3 day concert in Vienna because they were worried about more little girls getting murdered by Middle Easterners.

      "@Anna_Soubry
      UPDATE: Is it just me but suddenly it feels like we’ve got our country back?
      Swift effective action from Govt & police working in mutual respect
      Racism & thuggery called out in peaceful protest that united communities
      Like the grown ups are back
      Safe"

      [Anna Soubry is a former MP, minister, prosecutor, reporter, and anchor]

    3. Nardz   10 months ago

      https://x.com/Babygravy9/status/1821868045213544767?t=QzDixbraz5_3tvJyVdh8Ug&s=19

      Today's headline from The Scotsman, courtesy of Scotland's former first minister Humza Yousaf. Preserving freedom of speech and thought for ordinary people makes Elon Musk "one of the most dangerous men on the planet." The battlelines have never been more clearly drawn.

      [Pic]

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        "Resistance is futile!"

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    ...President Nicolás Maduro's camp—which the opposition says was squarely defeated, a fact backed up by substantial documentation—has yet to release the results it promised to prove its claimed "victory."

    Anti-commies know how to effectively stop the steal.

    1. Nardz   10 months ago

      https://x.com/VDAREJamesK/status/1821911841536406002?t=CVcXJMFeI705wGqvEIvF7w&s=19

      Again, no cause has been more justified by history than Rhodesia. Zimbabwe collapsed more completely than Ian Smith could have ever predicted. Yet there are no second thoughts, because ruining a functional society was the whole point.

      [Screenshot]

    2. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   10 months ago

      "Fortifications still under construction."

  3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    This is why Kamala avoids public speaking.

    https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1821638330435445144

    KAMALA HARRIS: "We believe in the collective!"

    1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

      Resistance is futile.

    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      Socialists of America couldn't be happier.

      DSA
      @DemSocialists
      Harris choosing Walz as a running mate has shown the world that DSA and our allies on the left are a force that cannot be ignored. Through collective action, DSA and the US left more broadly have made it clear that change is needed. DSA members organized in our workplaces and unions to realign the labor movement to support Palestinian liberation.

      1. Idaho-Bob   10 months ago

        DSA members organized in our workplaces and unions to realign the labor movement to support Palestinian liberation.

        This is their priority?

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          It's not a priority, it's just a lever.

          The priority is implementing communism.

          1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

            Yep. It fits into their oppressor/oppressed worldview. Also, you’d be surprised just how inherently antisemitic socialists can be, so any means of destroying the Jews looks attractive to them.

            1. Overt   10 months ago

              The key is definitely the Oppressor/Oppressed. If there is a potential for social chaos, they want to turn it into a reality. The revolution can only happen during times of social upheaval.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

                If there is a potential for social chaos, they want to turn it into a reality. The revolution can only happen during times of social upheaval.

                Yep, that’s exactly how their dialectic works. Act provocatively against the supposed “oppressor,” provoke the reaction you want, and then claim you’re oppressed. The Dennis the Peasant character in Monty Python and the Holy Grail pretty much embodied it.

                It really only gets shut down when they aren’t tolerated.

            2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

              At this point, anyone who considers him/her/itself a Jew, and also votes for Democrats, is a retard.

              1. R Mac   10 months ago

                I believe the term you’re looking for is useful idiots.

    3. Eeyore   10 months ago

      You will be assimilated.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      Politico:

      Harris’ last formal television sit-down interview was on June 24, when she joined MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” to mark the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision that ended federal protections for abortion. Three days later, she appeared on CNN and spoke one-on-one with anchor ANDERSON COOPER less than an hour after Biden’s disastrous debate performance, acknowledging that “it was a slow start” but confidently suggesting that the country should assess his performance in the office over three and a half years, not “90 minutes on a debate stage.”

      For a vice president who arguably damaged herself most gravely with her June 2021 interview with “NBC Nightly News” anchor LESTER HOLT, Harris’ determined on-air defense of Biden three years later — which she came up with independent of the campaign team — offered a template Biden and others would use to try to stop the political bleeding. While Biden’s closest aides also viewed that interview as a true show of loyalty, some in Harris’ orbit saw her confident and forceful responses to Cooper as proof of how far she’s come.

      Ever since Biden passed Harris the baton, news organizations have been pushing the vice president’s team for a sit-down interview. According to two people familiar with the campaign’s thinking, there are ongoing discussions about a joint interview with Harris and Walz prior to the convention, which begins on Aug. 19 in Chicago. But on the whole, Harris’ top communications aides are deeply skeptical, as Biden’s inner circle was, that doing big interviews with major TV networks or national newspapers offer much real upside when it comes to reaching swing voters.

      One longtime Harris ally suggested to West Wing Playbook that Harris could hold off on big interviews until after Labor Day. “There’s really no need,” the person said. “The voters that she needs are at the local level. They’re not reading the national press.”

      Walz, whose viral cable TV appearances helped propel him onto the ticket, could be deployed on television more liberally than Harris in the coming months, the two people said. But it’s also quite possible both candidates will focus much of their media outreach on podcasts, influencers and other platforms outside the traditional news media.

      So far, Harris’ rally speeches, delivered via teleprompter, have been well received. And she has routinely interacted with the reporters that travel with her — but on her terms. She often visits with the press pool seated at the back of her plane (something Biden did just twice in more than three years), but speaking only off the record. And when she has chosen to comment on the record on something in the news, Harris has spoken to the pool on the tarmac, making statements but not taking questions.

      “What is the incentive for her [to take more questions]?” said another person close to the campaign who was granted anonymity to share how Harris’ team views the matter. “She’s getting out exactly the message she wants to get out.”

      1. Super Scary   10 months ago

        "“What is the incentive for her [to take more questions]?” said another person close to the campaign who was granted anonymity to share how Harris’ team views the matter. “She’s getting out exactly the message she wants to get out.”"

        And that message...is? She's not an old white man?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

          "SHE'S A DEMOCRAT!!!"

          In 2024, brand is all that matters.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

          She's a black woman. At least now she is, before she was Indian.

      2. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

        Would it be better to have a press conference and just make things up. Like crowd size and helicopter crashes. Or to just skip press conferences?

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          Are you admitting that your fellow lefty can't even handle softball questions from her political allies in the media?

          1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

            No. What I am asking is does it matter if Harris has a press conference when Trump's press conferences are nothing but the ravings of a senile old man. If Trump was actually answering questions, then Harris would be feeling pressure. Right now, Harris gets more than enough out of a Trump press conference.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

              "Vote for the non-entity!"

            2. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

              Mod4ever is totally not a Democrat. He just uses all of their talking points and supports Democrats exclusively.

              1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

                Are they Democrat's talking points or just obvious to all? Do you think that presser helped Trump?

                1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

                  What I am asking is does it matter if Harris has a press conference when Trump’s press conferences are nothing but the ravings of a senile old man.

                  That is a Dem talking point. And to portray Trump as senile after you and the other Dems spent 4 years gaslighting about how Biden was mentally sharp and just had a stutter, or a cold, etc. is rich. It's almost as though you and the other Dems will just say whatever you think you can get away with to help Dems gain more power. But I forgot. You're a moderate and totally not in the tank for the Democrats.

    5. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      Townhall.com:

      "Vice President Kamala Harris, prone to word salads and gaffes, has devised a plan to keep that from happening again: memorize the speech and recite it over and over again.
      Critics pointed out that Harris is using the same speech for several different events, proving she is incapable of speaking without a script or teleprompter in front of her.

      On Tuesday, Harris’ speech in Philadephia was nearly identical to the speech she gave last month in Wilmington, Delaware, when she first addressed campaign headquarters.

      Watch below:

      https://twitter.com/i/status/1821705423713386750

      Kamala Harris is TOTALLY incapable of speaking without a script.

      This is pathetic

      Every “speech” she gives is just a rerun of the first.

    6. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      If you can stand 2.5 minutes of listening to her babble...

      https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1821961263515120108

      Team Trump releases a brutal montage of Kamala Harris without her script

      This is why they're hiding her

  4. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    Can you imagine paying $87.25 per month for rent, while the apartments above/below you go for $3,800, $4,800, & $5,200 (for the very top floor)?

    It's mostly the apartment thing I can't envision.

    1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      Yeah, it’s too noisy if you aren’t on the top floor.

      1. Yuno Hoo   10 months ago

        Water from above is also a thing.

        1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

          That’s not water…

      2. Dillinger   10 months ago

        >>too noisy if you aren’t on the top floor.

        Flesh is Burning is my favorite of their songs.

    2. Nardz   10 months ago

      https://x.com/MedGold_/status/1821902448471970102?t=S4mmi8vAHmHUOzAIb09_Yg&s=19

      I won’t share it, but the video of the black man stabbing a white man while he’s asleep in a laundromat will be tossed into the dustbin with millions of other ‘black people doing whatever they want’ videos that happen every single day. No one will know his name or the victim’s name. He won’t go to jail. He will be violent again. And it will receive zero media coverage. Because he’s black.

    3. Longtobefree   10 months ago

      Actually, I CAN imagine paying $87.25 per month for rent.
      Doesn't that prove rent control works?

      1. Idaho-Bob   10 months ago

        What is the tax liability on that unit?

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      What's the difference between a rent-controlled NYC apartment and a prison cell?

      1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

        The locks on a cell work?

  5. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    GARM, which colluded with advertisers to bankrupt conservative sites, breaks up just a week after X begins a lawsuit.

    The cockroaches will survive. They will rebrand and continue.

    https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/advertiser-coalition-discontinuing-activities-two-days-after-x-antitrust-suit

    1. Overt   10 months ago

      The big power of the lawsuit is that it ignited a coverage storm that the media cannot hide. Musk and others have been grumbling about this cartel for months, and the media largely ignored it. But as soon as he filed suit, it turned this into a culture war. The media was mobilized to defend their honor, and this led to all the twitterati activists jumping in to pile on…and that in turn created pushback.

      This suit will likely go away, but in its place there are now letter-writing campaigns, and boycotts of advertisers whose activist marketing departments had joined GARM. There are now executive teams in companies learning about their membership in an anti-conservative conspiracy for the first time, and they are going to have to decide if alienating half the population is worth their time. Likely if they were told at all, it was sold to them as a risk-mitigation strategy ("We don't want to advertise next to KKK articles, do we?") but when they realize that they are part of attempts to silence even moderately conservative-friendly platforms, it will change.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        Musk and others have been grumbling about this cartel for months, and the media largely ignored it. But as soon as he filed suit, it turned this into a culture war. The media was mobilized to defend their honor, and this led to all the twitterati activists jumping in to pile on…and that in turn created pushback.

        It's important to keep in mind here that it only went as far as it did because Musk is a member of the elite mafia himself. All the stuff going on at the top is really just a low-grade civil war between guys like him and Peter Thiel, and the champagne marxists like the Rockefellers, Bill and Melinda Gates (yeah, I know they're divorced, but she kept the name so I'm tying them together), Soros, Mackenzie Scott, Reid Hoffman, Larry Fink, etc.

        Musk bankrolling Gina Carano's lawsuit against The Rat, and Thiel bankrolling Hulk Hogan's suit against Gawker all those years ago, are really skirmishes between the left and right wings of the elite.

        1. Overt   10 months ago

          Absolutely. However, Musk had a come-to-jesus moment when his oldest kid went woke, commie and trans. He legitimately believes that the woke mind virus will be very, very bad for civilization and has made destroying it one of his many priorities.

          Certainly, those of us who are not elite can pine for a day when Elites have much less power over us. However, in the power-struggles between them, Musk (to me) is preferable to many alternatives.

          Put another way, there are a set of Elites who want to be at the top of a more or less capitalist society. And there are Elites who are on a mission to fundamentally transform the nature of our society into a benevolent authoritarian, totalitarian society where we are cared for like babies.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

            'Put another way, there are a set of Elites who want to be at the top of a more or less capitalist society. And there are Elites who are on a mission to fundamentally transform the nature of our society into a benevolent authoritarian, totalitarian society where we are cared for like babies.'

            I wonder if these opponents share a common root. Did the hyper-consumer movement post WWII that targeted kids as customers inspire social forces to seek perpetual childhood? So while free enterprise fans raked in dollars, nanny socialists saw advantages in the promise of caring for people who don't want to grow up.

            1. Overt   10 months ago

              I think that these people are control freaks. Every successful entrepreneur I have ever met was absolutely convinced that they knew what was best for any decision, big or small. And if they didn't know the answer now, they just needed more data and could tell you the right choice.

              Free enterprise is messy and chaotic and full of people making "stupid" choices. They get fat. They see people buy crude things and live in trailer parks and waste their lives on frivolous pursuits. People choosing to be unhealthy are wastes, in their eyes.

              These people see an enterprise fail in a cycle of creative destruction and they see that as waste- if that company had just done what these other guys do, everything would have been fine. They see food surpluses as waste. They see a vibrant dynamic society as a bunch of people who aren't doing things THE RIGHT WAY.

              No matter how benevolent they are, the Gates' of the world think they know better than you. And they delude themselves by thinking that if they just narrow your scope enough, and restrict you enough, and move you around to the right parts of the chess board, then you will freely choose to do what they knew you should do all along.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

                Yeah, these guys make it blatantly obvious how much of a god complex they have. That's not good for any society because they're ultimately only human, and more likely than not to actually fuck things up because they AREN'T God.

                1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                  I can only imagine that when you have enough power or money, the bulk of humanity fall into just two categories of threats or potential fuckpuppets. Come to think of it, that lines up pretty well with the ancient Greek concept of a god...

            2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

              I wonder if these opponents share a common root. Did the hyper-consumer movement post WWII that targeted kids as customers inspire social forces to seek perpetual childhood?

              I think the culture of youth worship that manifested itself in the 60s certainly contributed to it. How often have Gen-Xers and even Millennials accused Boomers of having a form of Peter Pan syndrome, until it got to a point where the Boomers simply stopped acting like it only because they couldn't handle it physically anymore? It's not really an accident that savings rates dropped below double digits in the mid-1980s, when the oldest Boomers were in the prime of their earning power, and haven't recovered since.

  6. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    What is with Democrats and their actions to avoid FOIA?

    Dustin Grage
    @GrageDustin
    For everyone getting their FOIA requests in for oppo on Kamala Harris’s new VP pick.

    Remember to also make requests for Walz’s alias that he used throughout the pandemic “Tim Mankato.”

    His administration oversaw and allowed the largest pandemic fraud in the country.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

      Assuming Democrats always have something to hide, and what they're hiding is bad, should be SOP. They wouldn't go out of their way to obfuscate everything they do otherwise.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   10 months ago

      His administration oversaw and allowed the largest pandemic fraud in the country.

      No, he played his part but the largest fraud was the 5-7 federal covid bills. The entire covid response was fraud. Trillions flushed down the toilet and what did we get for that; funding baristas to stay home (and then protest/burn cities) and the retardation of entire generation of children.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    Please give my show, cohosted with Zach Weissmueller, a watch/listen.

    I admit it never occurred to me that it could be an audio listen.

    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

      I'd do it for Liz, but Zach is bad for my blood pressure.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        You said the word blood. Are you Hitler?!?

        1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

          SarcjeffJeffsarc - "That checks out".

    2. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

      I can't stand to just sit and listen to podcasts, or watch the talking heads that speak the podcast. The only time I can is when driving, and I don't have hour long commutes.

      I can read a whole lost faster than I can listen, and I can skin, go forwards and backwards, and search text.

      But most of all, almost every podcast I have tried to listen to, or read a transcript of, could be boiled down to one tenth its size. I'm quite happy reading a book for several hours, or working out problems for hours on end. But podcasts, whether oral, video, or transcript, are like driving around in first gear. No matter how much you mash the accelerator, you're stuck in first gear, my brain starts to wander, and pretty soon I've stopped it and found something more productive to do.

      It's one thing to have people debating each other. You can learn from that. But an interview, even a contentious one? No, the interviewers spend most of their time trying to understand the points made by their subject. "But isn't that ..." "Do you mean ..."

      No thanks.

      1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

        I almost always watch YouTube videos on 1.5 times speed, and read the captions. Everyone seems to talk too slow with a lot of filler words.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        I’ve found that, unless I’m on a road trip, 15 minutes is about the extent of what I can stand before I lose interest. One of the reasons I like the Joe Rogan clips on YouTube is that they’re usually only about 4-7 minutes long, but from what I understand his podcast goes on for about an hour or more. Joe’s entertaining, but I’m not listening to that shit for an hour.

        James Lindsay has the same problem in that his deep dives can get very repetitive. His shorter 10-minute clips are a lot easier to digest. I do think he realizes this to some extent because he’s broken up his analyses of the works of Marcuse, Freire, Gayle Rubin, etc. into multi-part videos, but even those can be pretty exhausting to listen to.

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Rogan is usually 2 to 3 hours.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

            Jesus. I guess if you look at it as a couple of guys hanging out at a barbeque and bullshitting, that makes sense, but that is a fucking long time to listen to that.

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              He does a good job of switching topics every 20 or 30 minutes.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

                I can listen to some Rogan interview-shows while I do other things, like chores in my garage. But only about 1 in 3 shows catch my attention enough.

                1. Overt   10 months ago

                  See I can't do this. My wife always did homework and now does office work with the TV on. I cannot do that...If the TV is on, I am not getting any other work done.

                2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                  I'm like 1 in 8. But always listen to Protect Our Parks.

                3. R Mac   10 months ago

                  I skip all the mma guys and most of the comedians. I usually try to listen to episodes with people I’m not familiar with. I rarely make it through the whole episode.

                  1. R Mac   10 months ago

                    I’d also recommend Michael Malice’s Your Welcome.

                    1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

                      The recent one with Kurt Metzger was rather entertaining.

            2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

              It's a conversation with an interesting person, not a lecture or monologue.

              They switch topics, opine, change their minds, tell jokes, tease, talk about unrelated things like childhood, friends, or that time they got hammered and did something dumb, share insights, etc.

              Sometimes if what they are talking about doesn't interest me I'll skip ahead 15 minutes and the conversation has usually shifted to something that does.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

                Every guest needs to bring up bears when they go on Rogan. His ruminations on them are always so fucking funny, and he can't help himself when the subject comes up.

        2. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

          “but from what I understand his podcast goes on for about an hour or more. ”

          Its like 3 hours. His kind of podcast and those like it, I find myself liking when I have a bunch of work to do in the shop or grass to cut etc. I have to be pretty interested in the guest though, otherwise I cant do it.

          Agreed on Lindsay. He’s doing god’s work and is spot on (and has been ahead of the curve on most culture war stuff) but his stuff gets repetitive, even if he is completely correct and its important

          Just about anyone that has Douglas Murray on ill watch the whole thing, love that dude

          1. Dillinger   10 months ago

            >>Agreed on Lindsay.
            yep.
            >>Douglas Murray on ill watch the whole thing
            yep.

        3. Sometimes a Great Notion   10 months ago

          I use the clips as preview for whether I want to listen/watch. If it's an engaging conversation about a subject I am interested in or am completely ignorant; I'll tune in to most of it.

          Good for rainy days, along with a long drive.

      3. Zeb   10 months ago

        This is why I'm very selective about podcasts I listen to. If there is someone who I'm very interested in who is good at explaining what they mean I often find it pretty engaging and like the long form. But a lot do end up being too slow and pointless to bother with.

      4. Overt   10 months ago

        Yes the podcasts I have tended to listen to are ones where they are actually more presenting an audio book. The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire is a great one, and the What is Money: John Sayer series is another one.

        Most other podcasts, as you say, are either so repetitive as to lose my interest or so extemporaneous that they have no point unless it is people screaming at each other.

        1. R Mac   10 months ago

          If you like history check out Marty Made. The Explorers Podcast is also interesting.

      5. Ron   10 months ago

        Your comment is so on point i've come to the same conclusion for radio talk shows, so often they uselessly blabber on and i yell at the radio get to the f'n point

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          That was one of the advantages of talk radio, is that there was typically a producer in the back booth to keep the actual host on task instead of going off on random tangents or beating a dead horse. Podcasts often don't have that kind of structure in place.

      6. Minadin   10 months ago

        I 'watch' on YouTube while I'm doing house chores, which makes it more like an audio podcast. Beats listening to talk radio, anyway.

  8. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    What's happening in Venezuela? Following Venezuela's presidential election a week and a half ago, President Nicolás Maduro's camp—which the opposition says was squarely defeated, a fact backed up by substantial documentation—has yet to release the results it promised to prove its claimed "victory."

    Has he even started arresting people for demanding the government held election materials? Amateur.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      The experts conclude that the numbers that appear to portray Maduro as the winner are statistically improbable. Data released by the team of opposition presidential candidate Edmundo González Urrutia match 'mathematically and statistically,' the experts say."

      Cmon man. We all know statistical analysis is fake. Only government held materials is valid. Ask jeffsarc.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        What are these "materials" you speak of? I have been told that ultimate authority, including election results, comes from press releases.

      2. Super Scary   10 months ago

        "The experts conclude that the numbers that appear to portray Maduro as the winner are statistically improbable."

        How does he feel about mail in ballots?

    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      In response to his defeat, Maduro has not only refused to release the results his team promised but has also ordered internet providers to block access to X for the next 10 days.

      Pfft. He forgot YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, etc. Fucking amateur.

      1. Ajsloss   10 months ago

        And *you* forgot mastodon. Who is the fucking amateur now?

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Everyone forgets mastodon.

          1. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

            Even ENB?

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              Who?

              1. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

                He's on first.

                1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

                  What?

                  1. Its_Not_Inevitable   10 months ago

                    I don't know.

                    1. Dillinger   10 months ago

                      third base!

        2. Jerry B.   10 months ago

          Master Don? That the MAGA Channel?

    3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      "Use X. Download VPN. Share posts on X. Communicate on Whatsapp. Don't leave chats," writes journalist Orlando Avendaño (in Spanish) on X.

      Ha. Proof these are fight right insurrectionists. Trust the government. They said the elections were clean.

      Wonder if the idiots here pushing 2020 narratives realize they were on the side Maduro has taken in 2020. Probably not.

      1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

        Do you realize you are on the same side Hillary was in 2016?

        1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

          No grasshopper, he is not.

          1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

            Oh, the facts are different between the 2 elections or something?

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              Please. Explain why you think the issues are the same.

              I’ll even simplify it for you.

              Unelected offices and parties have an incentive for electoral corruption to retain power. Most of the GoP didnt even like Trump outside of the voter for sure not the political establishment.

              We saw active election boards and The Resistance fight against Trump. We see government threatening any request to look into elections they fortified. When did Trump have the backing to fortify an election.

              This is pretty retarded both sides.

              1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                "Woosh" is the term I believe the kids use in these situations.

                1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                  What a stunning defense of your bald assertion lol.

                  You said something stupid and apparently now realize it so you look around seeing how to back out and mimic sarc.

                  Good job buddy.

                  1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                    Here, try again. You said, "Wonder if the idiots here pushing 2020 narratives realize they were on the side Maduro has taken in 2020."

                    I said, "Do you realize you are on the same side Hillary was in 2016?"
                    Think about it.

                    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      My comment above shows how I’ve thought about it. Your deflections show you have not.

                      Simple questions.

                      What did Hillary blame? Answer. Russians and Comey.

                      What similarities were there in 2016 to 2020 or Venezuela. Answer. None.

                      2020 irregularities.

                      Late night shift in vote totals.
                      Vote by mail.
                      Partisan admittance to fortifying elections.
                      Criminal threats of investigating votes.

                      2016:
                      Mostly in person votes.
                      No late night shifts.
                      Nobody even questioned illegal votes.
                      No criminal threats for recounts or any questions.

                      Your assertion is not just bald but fucking retarded.

                      If you disagree, fucking defend it. You refuse to do so.

                      What 2016 irregularities are you or Hillary claiming? She didn’t claim that. Trump didn’t threaten her for questioning anything. He never disallowed investigations.

                      So prove you aren’t just being retarded and defend your fucking retarded assertion.

                      Lol.

                    2. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                      If you disagree, fucking defend it. You refuse to do so.

                      I don't disagree. So what does Maduro have to do with 2020?

                    3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      Did sarc hack your account? There are a half dozen examples in this very thread.

              2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

                Comments I made elsewhere back in 2016:

                Fears of a Trump dictatorship are overblown. We have a dictator with a pen and a phone now, and GOP in Congress will do nothing simply because of the color of his skin.

                If HRC wins, they will do nothing because of her sex, and she will continue in the same vein as Obama, and by her own admission will appoint SC Justices who will gut 2nd Amendment.

                Let's say Trump wins. A GOP Congress, who for the most part hate him, will have no qualms about cutting him off at the knees--he's a rich white man. At least we can be pretty sure about his SC appointments and secure in the knowledge that the rest of the government is not about to let him go off the deep end.

                The point is that they GOP establishment hates him because they are the establishment (simi lar to Cruz only far more so). Dems hate him because they are Dems.

                1. Ersatz   10 months ago

                  Fears of a Trump dictatorship are NOT overblown....
                  they are delusional.... full stop!

            2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

              Of course not. But Jesse isn’t honest enough to admit it.

              1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                Maybe you can explain retard. Or should I google it?

                1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                  The drunk troll doesn't care. He probably doesn't even know what is being talked about.

                  1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                    It ain't me, dumbass.

                    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      I’m now thinking you're socking as yourself to formulate a defense.

                      You’ve said this shit dozens of times.

                    2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      Not me. I’ve got no patience for idiots who are detached from reality. Just keep arguing against the imaginary voices in your head. It's what you do best. I won't interfere.

                    3. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

                      As I've said before, you and whoever is spoofing you sound identical now.

                      This is your opportunity to retire.

              2. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

                Quick, find a Bastiat quote!

                1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                  Definitely don't read the essay the quote is pulled from!

            3. Nardz   10 months ago

              The facts are different because of reality, you pathetic faggot tumor

              1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                That was my point, professor.

                1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                  Lol. Sure it was. Thats why sarc defended it and everyone else called you out.

                  1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                    OH MY GOD

        2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Where did I say russia stole the Venezuelan election?

        3. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

          "Do you realize you are on the same side Hillary was in 2016?"

          Don't you guys usually emphasize "Hillary conceded right away!"

          1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

            You're the one emphasizing that Hillary conceded. I'll just add that Trump and Maduro didn't.

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              Hillary has said as recently as last year that the election was stolen lol.

              Trump left office just as every other president before him dumbass. The dems literally threatened criminal prosecutions for questioning the results.

              What the fuck is wrong with you?

              A phone call to concede is not part of political handover of power. What the actual fuck. Lol.

              1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                I give up.

                1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

                  As you should.

                  1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

                    Yeah, you can lead a horse to water...

                    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      You never even pulled out water lol.

                      Maybe try to form a cogent argument or explain your intention with the original one.

                      Because to everyone it appears to be a bland both sides without any thought.

            2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

              If by conceded you mean inspired the surveillance state to take down Trump from the inside, like good "sophisticated" establishment types should, then sure.

              1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                She also ran a multu month campaign to pressure electoral college voters to switch their votes.

                1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

                  A lot of folks were still planning on how to make her President a year after the loss through impeachment, some sort of altruistic move by Pence to step down, Speaker Paul Ryan would become president, and he also would bow to the righteousness of Hillary, Name Hillary as VP, then step down to make Hillary President.

                  https://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-president-lawrence-lessig-post-686077

                  How Hillary Clinton Still Can, and Should, Become President After the Trump-Russia Investigation
                  Published Oct 16, 2017

                  1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

                    I noticed that in that article is a link:

                    "Related: Hillary Clinton losing to Trump was like Jesus's crucifixion"

                    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

                      Even more evidence those retards don't even know what's in the Bible.

                  2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

                    Wow, talk about retard political fantasy fair tales. But totally not election denial or sedition.

              2. R Mac   10 months ago

                Yeah, running a coup attempt is pretty fucking far from simply conceding.

    4. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      She's not the only one. Opponents of the regime keep getting disappeared. Over 22 people have been killed so far in demonstrations since the election results were announced, and an estimated 2,000 people have been jailed.

      Finally. Better than Garland. He only got around 1700 with all the jailing.

      1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

        Venezuelans doing the work Americans won’t do.

    5. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      On trumped-up charges?

  9. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

    "At CNN's request, several experts analyzed the results offered by both the government-aligned National Electoral Council of Venezuela (CNE) and the opposition platform Comando Con Venezuela,"

    CNN already putting 1000% more into investigating this election than they did in 2020, but about the same amount they did in 2016 in the US

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      But still about the same level of desire to overturn the results (except for 2016).

      1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        But they can make hay on this knowing full well that anything they might shake loose accidentally will have absolutely 0 impact on Madura. They sure didn't want to accidentally uncover something in 2020 that would have exposed depths of the "fortification".

    2. Moonrocks   10 months ago

      It's crazy how election denialism is suddenly in vogue again.

  10. Ajsloss   10 months ago

    Now Joy Is Fueling Her Campaign.

    Maybe she can send some of that joy to the hospitals in Gaza. They’ve got to be close to running out of fuel by now.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      She probably means Joy Reid.

      1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        Send that Joy to Gaza yesterday

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

          Wearing some kind of rainbow-feminist T-shirt.

        2. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   10 months ago

          Hasn't Gaza suffered enough?

      2. damikesc   10 months ago

        Could've meant the drug "joy" from the decidedly meh game "We Happy Few"

    2. NoVaNick   10 months ago

      The fact that the NYT and other prog media are jizzing themselves over Harris’ VP pick speaks volumes, and it ain’t going to make her happy that he’s stealing all the limelight.

      1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        And they can then pivot directly to articles like:

        "Why white men get more favorable media coverage than women of color: The struggle continues"

        Its a self sustaining economy of shitlibbery and critical race theory.

      2. Overt   10 months ago

        What do you mean? There is not a single article being written right now that wasn't pushed by her and the DNC. All these articles are focusing on Walz because they have figured out that people pay attention for about three days before their mind is made up. And if all people hear is article after article about how Walz is like the best dad ever, then they won't hear about his cities burning and his socialist bonafides. This is all going to plan.

        All they need to do is impart one marketing message: "We are more likable than Trump".

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

          Actually, all they need to do is not say anything about policy or plans. Most voters are now making choices against what they don't like. If Harris says nothing, more people will not get upset with her.

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   10 months ago

            Worked for Basement Bunker Biden.

    3. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   10 months ago

      Is "Joy" a euphemism? Her campaign is fueled by "cult-like fervor", aka Joy.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        With so much "joy" forming a cult-like following, I'm reminded of this show I watched as a much younger man.

        https://buffy.fandom.com/wiki/Jasmine

        Jasmine appeared before the rest of Angel's crew, turning them into her followers and announcing that, despite the great evil done in her name, her plan was to bring world peace and the elimination of evil, starting in Los Angeles. However, Jasmine's peace came at a high price. One drawback was that Jasmine needed to devour a certain number of humans to maintain her force, with that number growing as her power and influence grew.

        Jasmine's mind control virtually eliminated free will from the world, with everyone unable to do much of anything except praise and serve Jasmine all day, until Fred saw Jasmine's true form — that of a decaying, maggot-infested dead vessel.

        1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   10 months ago

          Angel isn't that old.

          Apt analogy though.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

            Its run ended 20 years ago.

  11. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

    "The New York Times: "Harris Used to Worry About Laughing. Now Joy Is Fueling Her Campaign."

    Its got that "Biden was always self conscious about his stutter" vibes

    1. NoVaNick   10 months ago

      And millions of wine moms are now cruising Home Depot aisles looking for a hookup.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Hole Depot is one hell of an accurate mistype.

        Nooo. You fixed it.

        1. Overt   10 months ago

          It was Johnesque.

        2. Dillinger   10 months ago

          >>Hole Depot

          knew a chick in college ...

          1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

            Still have her number? Sarc needs some help.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

              Some help?

              1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                Was being nice.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

      Along with 'he's got a cold'.

      1. Super Scary   10 months ago

        Or "he was just looking for a chair!"

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   10 months ago

          Jackie was sitting in it.

  12. Yuno Hoo   10 months ago

    A public middle school in El Paso, Texas, has chosen to ban wearing all-black clothing, saying that it is "associated with depression and mental health issues."

    Perhaps the school will mandate wearing light blue pantsuits, saying they are "associated with joy."

    1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      What percentage of black is acceptable? Like 13%?

      1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        "13%, maximum!"

        - standard planned parenthood worker

      2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        1% more than whatever a black conservative has if conservative. 1% less than whatever percent kamala is if democrat.

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

      Plum is the new black.

    3. Anomalous   10 months ago

      I see a red shirt and I want to dye it black.

      1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

        I love it.

        1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

          Curse you! Now I can't get the song out of my head.

          1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

            (I also curse Reason's random placement of responses)

    4. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

      Antifarts hardest hit.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      Are they also going to teach Venn diagrams?

    6. Vernon Depner   10 months ago

      School uniforms solve these problems. There's way too much "expression" going on in schools.

  13. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

    Use X. (Formerly Twitter) Download VPN. Share posts on X. (Formerly Twitter)

    FTFY

    1. Super Scary   10 months ago

      I'm going to stick with Twitter (Currently X).

      1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

        I approve this message.

        1. Ersatz   10 months ago

          I've always thought Twitter was a stupid name.

          1. Dillinger   10 months ago

            uch and those fucking bird chirps from everyone's phones when it was new ...

      2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        Ah, much like "It's smaller on the outside."

  14. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

    The Global Alliance for Responsible Media is 'discontinuing' after Elon Musk's X filed an antitrust lawsuit against it

    They claim it's because they don't have the funds to fight the antitrust lawsuit, whereas it is actually because they are guilty as sin and know what they did was highly illegal.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      Documents already showed it was partisan and collusive. They are fucked. The head guys emails already got leaked and that was before Elon got access to any discovery.

      1. Overt   10 months ago

        As I noted above- the discovery is what is so important here. As with the Twitter Files, X has the ability to get the extreme partisanship into the public. They will not get much from GARM, but they will absolutely mobilize boycotts.

        1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

          It's important that X and Rumble convince the judges to go ahead despite The World Federation of Advertisers ending GARM.

          They have to make the rubble bounce to scare off others doing this shit.

          1. Overt   10 months ago

            If companies legitimately think they will get the same reaction as Bud Light, it will do more damage to any future advertising consortium than X's lawsuit will. Tactically, the case against GARM is strong, but the case against individual advertisers is harder to make. In cases where they have actual emails from advertisers (Like Dunkin Donuts), they can probably paint them as active conspirators. But again, they have to show not only that DD dislikes Conservative messages, but that they engaged in anti-trust activities to push that. It is a LONG row to hoe, and I don't think they will prevail.

            Strategically, though, getting these emails out there showing advertiser's active contempt for half of the country is far, far more damaging to this censorious movement.

    2. Ajsloss   10 months ago

      after Elon Musk’s X

      Is that formerly Twitter?

      1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

        I really, really, wish people would stop deadnaming X.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

          Look, it's really hard for some people. Imagine what you would do if your hippie friend Moonbeam showed up one Saturday with a brown shirt and funny mustache and demanded you call him Adolf.

  15. NoVaNick   10 months ago

    Maduro is just being neighborly.

    1. Dillinger   10 months ago

      +1 Stolen Venezuela.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    "Harris Used to Worry About Laughing. Now Joy Is Fueling Her Campaign."

    Legalize whatever they have her on.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      Is it the same stuff they gave Joe with before press conferences? If so, they may need to cut back on the dose.

  17. Overt   10 months ago

    "Madam VP is not to be played with!"

    The Democrats are playing this very shrewdly. They intentionally waited until after the GOP Convention so that Biden's abdication would reset the news cycle, and an opportunity for the GOP to really make a case against the new candidate had passed.

    The GOP has 3 months to convince enough people that Harris is as bad as Clinton or 2024 Biden. That is a tall order, when every media enterprise is lined up against him, and Harris is playing coy on any extemporaneous appearance. Tim Walz- for all his faults- is actually helping her. We have half a dozen articles about him on this site, which isn't great for Walz. But for Kamela, every moment not showing clips of her cackling, petty, vacuous performances is a victory. All she has to do is run out the clock.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      The media is busy slobbering over them including how fashionable every day man Waltz dresses. It is sickening to watch.

      Still no policies on their website.

      1. NoVaNick   10 months ago

        At some point though, they will realize that they are not voting for Walz, but Kamala. Also, someone will bring up the fact that it took a white man to make her electable.

        1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

          She is not electable.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

            But most supporters are not voting for Harris. They are voting for a nebulous Democrat entity.

          2. Vernon Depner   10 months ago

            Neither is Trump, but one of them is going to be elected.

      2. Overt   10 months ago

        Again, that doesn't matter.

        They aren't there to win you over. They lost in 2016 because kids didn't want to vote for Hillary, and some swing voters hated Hillary more than they disliked Trump.

        Now Trump has that problem. He is a known quantity- and he has 3 months to convince the public that he is still better than Kamala. And that will not be easy with the lockstep PR that the media has demonstrated.

        1. NoVaNick   10 months ago

          The polls are back to where they were before the infamous debate- a tie. I would not be too worried about anything yet since it’s only the media who, so far, are so excited all because of a boring, and frankly annoying, white guy from Minnesota. This is Trump’s to lose.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

            Also, remember that no one wants to be seen as racist/sexist, so they tell pollsters that they like Cackles.
            Further, no one wants to be seen as a MAGA red-neck, so they tell pollsters they don't like Trump.
            When that ballot is in front of them, we get the revealed preference.

            1. rbike   10 months ago

              I was called by a pollster recently. I answered the question would I vote for Kamala? My answered was "No, she is a god dam fucking communist." Same answer for any of the Democrats I was asked about.

          2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

            In 2020 Joe was up 7 at this point.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

          A century of coopting media (and academia and Hollywood) finally pays off.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        Media is just following Harris lead, figuratively sucking Walz dick.

    2. n00bdragon   10 months ago

      Harris has been convincing everyone how bad she is for years. Up until 5 minutes ago even Democrats hated her.

      Honestly, if the GOP can't come up with anything to argue against her that's entirely on them.

      1. Overt   10 months ago

        The people who will decide this election are:

        1) Youths and minorities who reliably vote democrat *IF* they can be bothered to vote.
        2) Centrist wishy-washers who don't pay attention to politics.

        #1 have no disagreement with any Harris policy, and the "Rock Concert" rallies are 100% targeted at getting these people to feel FOMO about not being part of a movement. (And also, since 2016, the Democratic party can increasingly get their vote anyway through harvesting.)

        #2 are Trump's only hope, and reaching them through the MSM firewall is nearly impossible. It took 4 years and a bad debate to finally crater Biden.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    A public middle school in El Paso, Texas, has chosen to ban wearing all-black clothing, saying that it is "associated with depression and mental health issues."

    Wearing all black in Texas heat would be depressing and you'd have to be crazy.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      Honestly they are ust as tired of Raiders fans as the rest of us are.

      1. Dillinger   10 months ago

        in Texas the Raiders are Red.

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

      Worn loosely, dark clothing is cooler. I learned that from reading Jurassic Park. Plus, the Bedouin are probably not wrong.

      1. Ajsloss   10 months ago

        I learned that from reading Jurassic Park.

        Trust The Science! 🙂

        1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

          I was just being honest about my source, but Crichton did a shitload of research for that book. He was an MD and a published medical researcher. He is one of a number of science fiction writers that I would trust over career scientists. They tend not to have an agenda to promote. The comment in the book, delivered by Ian Malcolm, correctly references black body radiation just like Overt does below.

          Science! springs from credentialism, not creativity.

      2. Ron   10 months ago

        actually light colored clothing loosely reflects more heat away and interesting the full clothing keeps you cooler since when you sweat it doesn't immeditately dry off like it would with shorts on

        1. Overt   10 months ago

          There are interesting studies on this. The ones I have seen are somewhat inconclusive. It is noteworthy that while many bedouins wear dark clothes, there are still many desert tribes that wear light clothing.

          That said, loose clothing allows for both wicking of sweat when it comes in contact with the skin, and air circulation, which helps with evaporative cooling. Dark clothing also allows more blackbody radiation from your body. It also tends (depending on the material) to absorb more of the sun’s thermal radiation, which then can be dissipated by air circulation. You are basically wearing your own sun-shade.

          The general rule is that when worn tightly, light clothing is better, but when loose and with any amount of breeze, dark loose clothing works better. But again, there are lots and lots of variables here.

    3. Jerry B.   10 months ago

      Aspiring Johnny Cash imitators hardest hit.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

        One piece at a time.

  19. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

    "Do people who tweet like this prefer to live in a monarchy? I wouldn’t find these tweets odd in Syria or Saudi Arabia. Kind of odd in a country born on dissent and debate."

    ...yes, of course they do.

    All of the policies socialist want are assuming they will always be in control and the power of govt will just be used to fulfill their wishlists and never against them.

    They would vote Stalin in tomorrow if they had the chance.

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

      Most people don't know, and refuse to believe, that FDR had man crushes on Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin at one point or another.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

        It was mutual for Stalin. FDR and Churchill were the only leaders he respected. Churchill was the only one of them willing to relinquish power. FDR died, but the executive power he established has not diminished since. Eisenhower did try to warn us...

        1. Nardz   10 months ago

          Stalin didn’t have a crush on FDR, he realized FDR was a weak piece of shit who had a crush on him so he could get whatever he wanted.
          FDR tried to ingratiate himself with Stalin by acting like a teen girl and making jokes on Churchill.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

            Yeah, FDR thought Stalin was like the crytpo-commies in his administration, in that he could charm Stalin into going along with the US.

            Stalin was a fucking gangster who methodically and ruthlessly took down one of the most charismatic demagogues of the early communist movement. FDR was an idiot to think someone like that could be charmed by obsequiousness.

          2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

            Stalin didn’t have a crush on FDR, he realized FDR was a weak piece of shit who had a crush on him so he could get whatever he wanted.

            Those things are not mutually exclusive. From his own writings, Stalin was willing to negotiate with FDR and once FDR was gone, he considered nobody worthy of consideration. Churchill rightfully conceded his position when his party lost and Truman was a runner-up.

      2. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        FDR, like all the nanny state wannabes that have ever been, was drooling over the ability to have the govt tell its citizens to STFU and do what we tell you, or else.

        And of course, we saw this just 5 minutes ago with the COVID regime.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        Have you seen photos of Eleanor?

  20. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

    Do people who tweet like this prefer to live in a monarchy? I wouldn't find these tweets odd in Syria or Saudi Arabia. Kind of odd in a country born on dissent and debate.

    Chicks shouldn’t be running for office or voting.

    1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

      Between politics, journalism, and now entertainment and video games, one thing is very clear:

      When chicks are in charge, it goes to complete shit.

      You can pretty much know ahead of time how bad a project will turn out by looking at the M:F ratio, and how big the group is into DEI.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        I wonder what their M:F ratio would look like if they planned a mission to colonize Mars.

        1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

          oh ya, forgot to add the secret service to that, haha

  21. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

    "Joan Baez is selling limited edition portraits to support Harris’ campaign. Here’s how to buy one"
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/joan-baez-is-selling-limited-edition-portraits-to-support-harris-campaign-here-s-how-to-buy-one/ar-AA1oi9Wi?ocid=BingNewsSerp

    Is this to benefit Baez, Harris, or Baez' agent?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      Did Hunter paint the portraits?

  22. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

    Series of short clips of Oceania's inner party bragging about how evil they are:

    In a newly discovered Zoom recording, the Biden/Harris team reveals how they manipulated voters to think Biden's mental decline was "disinformation".

    Biden/Harris digital director Rob Flaherty says the DNC created a program to detect, track, and censor what it deemed "misinformation" (like Biden's mental decline). He calls it "critical" and "one of the more important decisions" made by the party in recent years.

    Emails show Flaherty carrying out the (supposedly) counter-misinformation program in the White House, pushing Facebook to censor Tucker Carlson for correctly saying the COVID-19 vaccine didn't stop transmission, and Tomi Lahren for her strong "my body, my choice" stance.

    Despite leading the Biden White House's efforts to censor "misinformation", when asked under oath, to define "misinformation", Flaherty refused.

    But in the Zoom call, Flaherty said "misinformation narratives" include "conversation online about corruption or mental fitness...or [Biden's] record on the Crime Bill"—effectively defining "misinformation" as anything that the Biden team found inconvenient.

    Becca Rinkevich, Biden's Rapid Response Director (later WH Deputy Director of Digital Strategy), also classified talk of Biden's mental decline as "disinformation"—"disinformation around his mental acuity".

    The Biden/Harris team microtargeted voters exposed to the "disinformation" (aka reality) of Biden's mental decline. They used psychographic targeting, a tactic that Cambridge Analytica was highly scrutinized for after the 2016 election.

    RINKEVICH: "We targeted folks based on online behavioral cues, building out personas, based on the type of content they were consuming, what they were searching, the kinds of websites they were visiting so that we could target folks in real-time as they were exposed to that disinformation."

    If you typed the words "Biden" + "senile" in a search bar, you'd be shown short videos of Biden speaking clearly. Upon hearing this, MSNBC's Chris Hayes exclaimed, "Wow."

    Biden's team also deployed an army of online influencers to fight "disinformation". When asked for an example of "disinformation" countered with this "digital organizing," Flaherty's example of such "disinformation" was the "question about [Biden's] mental fitness".

    Joining Flaherty & Rinkevich on Zoom, was the DNC Counter-Disinformation Program creator and lead analyst, Tim Durigan. His reports, according to Flaherty, "went to the highest levels of the [Biden] campaign".

    #TwitterFiles show Durigan tried to censor many posts, including a video mashup of Biden coughing posted by
    @JackPosobiec
    . He failed in the 1 instance. But it seems other such efforts were successful. Acc. to Lie Detectives he also "cultivated ties" with Google & Facebook.

    The Zoom host asks about the "big problem" of "true misinformation". Durigan says it's a "huge problem" & wants social media to suppress "true misinformation" to promote "authoritative" news sources like NYT. Big Tech's done that since '18, but apparently not enough for Tim.

    A month later, the "really authoritative" NYT celebrated the Biden/Harris team and called concerns about Biden's mental health, "baseless rumors" and "misinformation" from "right-wing influencers."

    But the Biden team didn't just get the media to forward their deception, they changed real votes. According to Rinkevich, "concern around [Biden's] mental acuity in particular went down by 8 points over the course of our campaign," resulting in "about 200K" votes for Biden.

    To put things in perspective, Biden won by fewer than 200K votes in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, & Wisconsin ***combined***

    Today, Rinkevich runs the Institute of Rebooting Social Media @ Harvard; Durigan leads DNC disinfo analysis; & Flaherty is Deputy Campaign Manager, overseeing digital ads & social for Kamala Harris despite her past criticism of the intrusive data collection he exploits.

    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

      "But the Biden team didn’t just get the media to forward their deception, they changed real votes. According to Rinkevich, “concern around [Biden’s] mental acuity in particular went down by 8 points over the course of our campaign,” resulting in “about 200K” votes for Biden."

      If you go back in the archives you'll see Chemjeff doing exactly that during the time period.

      1. BYODB   10 months ago


        Biden’s team also deployed an army of online influencers to fight “disinformation”.

        Coincidence?

    2. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      No widespread corruption.

    3. Super Scary   10 months ago

      So I had to look it up. Apparently, misinformation is just being wrong about something and disinformation is being intentionally wrong about something. It really seems like these people use those words interchangeably.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        The way it seems to be defined by the media is "misinformation" is information that Democrats disagree with, but can't really disprove (e.g., someone's stated opinion), while "disinformation" is any material that is verifiably true, but damning to the Party.

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      But how many average people, let alone Democrats, can now remember the "Joe is Great" narrative from June?

  23. Rick James   10 months ago

    A letter sent to parents by Charles Middle School principal Nick DeSantis stated that the clothing is "associated with depression and mental health issues."

    DeSantis... I knew it...

  24. Rick James   10 months ago

    Cringe political headlines from The New York Times: "Harris Used to Worry About Laughing. Now Joy Is Fueling Her Campaign."

    Seattle Times used "joy" in a headline about Harris. The media is in full propaganda mode. They literally received these talking points from the Harris campaign.

    1. NoVaNick   10 months ago

      Yep. Joy will only get you so far though…

      1. Ajsloss   10 months ago

        Hope and Change took the White House.

        1. HorseConch   10 months ago

          He also wasn't the incumbent running against an old, crooked war hawk during a financial crisis. As much as they want to present her as a fresh face, everyone that is fed up with what they've lived through know she has been the VP through all of it.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

            Weird.

          2. HorseConch   10 months ago

            He was running against the old war hawk, not the incumbent dealing with the shit he just caused.

          3. BYODB   10 months ago

            I'm not so sure about that. Now that Biden is fully beneath the bus, they can blame him for anything they like.

            1. HorseConch   10 months ago

              That will work well with the diehards, but do you think everyone else shaking their head about how shitty things are don't consider her involved?

              1. BYODB   10 months ago

                I mean, I can't stand her but personally I'd be forced to note the Vice President doesn't actually matter or hold much power in particular so...I'm not sure even I would consider her 'involved'.

                One doesn't need to dislike her for what she did as Vice President. All the shit she did before then is a perfectly good reason to dislike her.

      2. Ron   10 months ago

        Her laughter is the new "let them eat"

    2. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

      Is there any way to use campaign finance laws against them?

      1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        Ya, I dont know what amount her coverage is worth, but I can tell you its a large order of magnitude away from the 200k stormy got to keep her trap shut.

        Id wager Kamala has probably gotten what would cost billions of dollars in airtime in this widespread PR campaign they have going for her.

        1. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

          Maybe there are some district attorneys willing to make this case against these media companies.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

            New lawfare rules apply.

    3. Ron   10 months ago

      total gaslighting, it is not cackling from not knowing what to do but laughter from joy

    4. Super Scary   10 months ago

      Live, laugh, love.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

      Hey, I'd be joyful, too, if I knew the mass media were serving as my in-kind shills.

  25. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/09/another-day-another-fact-free-anti-trump-smear-from-the-axis/#more-130814

    One can safely add Yahoo! and the Los Angeles Times to the massive list of media organs that are ethically estopped from calling Donald Trump a habitual liar, since they habitually lie about him.

    The most recent example comes from the Times uncritically and deceptively reporting on a series of hyper-partisan, hysterical rants by LGTBQ+ Democrats in San Francisco (well, its San Francisco). Yahoo! then circulated the propaganda under its own banner online. Like the good little Axis of Unethical Conduct members they are, the LA Times and Yahoo! dutifully reported pure Trump Derangement fiction as news, and it was biased, dishonest, unethical journalism from the headline to the finish.

    Which, ironically, is not news either. This is how the news media has been operating where Trump is involved for ten years. This is how it plans on winning the Presidency for the Democrats again.

    The headline is “‘Our lives are on the line’: Why many LGBTQ+ people hope for a Harris win.” Not one LGBTQ+ American’s “life is on the line” in this election by any stretch of the imagination. Trump does not oppose gay rights or same sex marriage. He has made it clear that he believes in treating such citizens as anyone else should be treated. Believing, as most conservatives, Republicans and people who haven’t been brainwashed or bullied do, that LGBTQ+ lifestyle propaganda does not belong in public school classes does not endanger LGBTQ+ rights or lives.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      'Believing, as most conservatives, Republicans and people who haven’t been brainwashed or bullied do, that LGBTQ+ lifestyle propaganda does not belong in public school classes does not endanger LGBTQ+ rights or lives.'

      Yeah, but without K-12 indoctrination, where will the next LGBTQXYZ123 generation come from?

    2. Super Scary   10 months ago

      "The headline is “‘Our lives are on the line’: Why many LGBTQ+ people hope for a Harris win.”"

      How are any of them even left after Trump rounded them all up in 2016? It was literally the first thing he did!

      1. HorseConch   10 months ago

        The news cycle has gotten so short that nobody remembers the last time Trump was President or that Kamala is currently VP.

  26. Jerry B.   10 months ago

    “Maduro has not only refused to release the results his team promised but has also ordered internet providers to block access to X for the next 10 days…”

    So, a Democrat.

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

    'Scenes from New York: I woke up mad about rent control.'

    Just imagine how happy you would be if everyone in NYC paid $87.50 a month.

  28. Yuno Hoo   10 months ago

    "HopeJoy is not a strategy."

  29. Longtobefree   10 months ago

    "What's happening in Venezuela?"

    They are welcoming a team of 7 Harris-Walz staffers who are there to take notes. That's what is happening.

  30. Dillinger   10 months ago

    I miss Unicorn Abattoir. and long live Jerry Garcia.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   10 months ago

      If I were an eagle, I'd dress like a unicorn for you.

      1. Dillinger   10 months ago

        still funny four hours later.

  31. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>”Harris Used to Worry About Laughing. Now Joy Is Fueling Her Campaign.”

    New York Times used to worry about subscriptions …

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      Special subscription offers now for Childless Cat Ladies...

  32. Rick James   10 months ago

    Today's media coverage of our big candidates:

    Harris:

    A win for the Harris-Walz ticket would also mean the country’s first Native American female governor

    Trump recommits to a Sept. 10 debate and lashes out at Harris at news conference

    There's a hot new Harris-Walz fashion accessory, and the NRA is not amused

    Trump:

    Trump’s focus on Georgia election board raises fears for November vote

    Trump heads to Montana in a bid to oust Sen. Tester after failing to topple the Democrat in 2018

    Trump recommits to a Sept. 10 debate and lashes out at Harris at news conference

    And last but not least, the leader of the free world and current sitting president, Biden:

    ctrl-f Biden 0/0

  33. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>Please give my show, cohosted with Zach Weissmueller, a watch/listen.

    "How Likely is a Kamala Harris Presidency?" has so many flaws in the premise alone I'm terrified of what's inside.

  34. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>A public middle school in El Paso, Texas, has chosen to ban wearing all-black clothing

    Radiohead on line 2 ...

  35. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>I woke up mad about rent control.

    exponentially easier on you to post only when you're happy about NYC.

  36. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>What's happening in Venezuela?

    the long game in live time.

  37. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

    Is it just me, or does the fact that Progressive Insurance is running radio ads wherein a “normal” couch is the primary feature strike anyone as some sort of subtle Vance dig?

  38. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>Do people who tweet like this prefer to live in a monarchy? ... Kind of odd in a country born on dissent and debate.

    chicks ... cannot hold the smoke ... that's what it is.

  39. NoVaNick   10 months ago

    Let’s think about the reality of a Harris/Walz administration, if they also have majorities in both houses:
    -higher taxes, but not really on “the rich”. They’ll pass a tax on carbon, raising gas prices for sure, also tax other things they don’t like (guns, ammo, tobacco/vapes)
    -end of ICE cars within five years, to go with the higher gas tax to nudge us along. The price of EVs will continue to rise because of regulations and demand, so most people will hold onto their old jalopies, resulting in worse air quality.
    -end of gas stoves, heat, etc. so if you live in a cold place, your electric bill will go way up in the winter.
    -complete ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored vapes, and ultimately prohibition for anyone born after a certain year (several towns in Massachusetts are already doing this)

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

      More to the point, the end of the filibuster, which will give them license to shove through whatever they want.

      This is why I said yesterday that these two idiots are going to provoke a civil war, because they aren't used to running shit in an political environment where their party isn't 100% in control. They're going to end up pissing off enough red states with their bullshit that something will inevitably kick off, and once that happens you can't pull back from the brink anymore.

      Both Walz and Harris have made public statements that make it very clear they believe that they can enact anything they wish with impunity. When they try to impose federal mandates to allow child mutilation, suppression of political opposition online, and open borders, red states will end up drawing a line and saying, "Stop, or we're gone." And given their authoritarian impulses, like an abusive spouse they won't be able to help themselves in trying to force those states not to leave.

      1. NoVaNick   10 months ago

        The SCOTUS might stand in the way of some of their agenda, if they don’t destroy it first.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          That's the whole point of getting rid of the filibuster, to pass a law increasing the number of Supreme Court justices.

  40. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

    It looks like the presidential (and whatever those other elected officials are called) race has been framed as the Democratic Party vs. Trump. On one side, both the political establishment and their dedicated minions don't care much about who the figurehead might be. On the other side, the establishment and the people disagree about their candidate. And both sides see benefits in making the election all about Trump.

    1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

      In this Presidential election it seems the way to go is to have attention focused on your opponent. Trump benefitted when the focus was on Biden and Harris benefits when the focus is on Trump. This is not a good way to run an election. John McCain said his opponent was a good man with whom he disagreed. John lost and politicians learned. Now you opponent is not someone you disagree with but rather someone who will bring about the end of the world.

      1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

        John McCain was an idiot.

        1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

          I doubt that. He was however, naive enough to think that he could be gracious and civil.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

            Having your ass kissed by the media for being a "maverick" against the GOP will give that false impression. I'm sure he was the only one who was surprised that they turned their guns on him full blast when he became the nominee.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Supreme Court Said States Can't Discriminate in Alcohol Sales. They're Doing It Anyway.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.24.2025 7:00 AM

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!