Secret Service Director Receives Bipartisan Condemnation in Oversight Hearing
While there was some political grandstanding among members of Congress, the bipartisan demand for answers was refreshing.

On Monday, Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle appeared before the House Oversight Committee, a little over a week after the attempted assassination against former President Donald Trump.
While there was certainly some partisan grandstanding, both Republican and Democratic representatives took Cheatle to task over the blatant security failure.
On July 13, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks fired multiple shots as Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania; a bullet grazed Trump's ear, two other attendees were wounded, and a former Buffalo fire chief, Corey Comperatore, was killed while shielding his wife and two daughters. Crooks had climbed onto the roof of a nearby building and perched on his stomach with a semiautomatic rifle; a Secret Service sniper shot and killed Crooks a few seconds after the shooting started.
In the ensuing days, details came out that looked even worse for the Secret Service. Rallygoers had identified Crooks to law enforcement as a suspicious person more than an hour before the shooting, and Secret Service snipers spotted him on the roof 20 minutes before he started firing. Cheatle claimed that agents were not posted on top of that building because its "sloped roof" presented a "safety factor," but she gave no explanation for why the building was not included in the Secret Service's security perimeter (nor how a 20-year-old with no tactical training was able to traverse the dangerous roof without issue). The Washington Post reported over the weekend that the agency had previously denied Trump's requests for additional security personnel.
"It was unacceptable," Cheatle told ABC News's Pierre Thomas on July 15. "And it's something that shouldn't happen again….The buck stops with me."
But in Monday's hearing, Cheatle gave noncommittal answers, noting that she did not have full information or was "still verifying timelines." She noted that she was waiting on "a full and complete report of exactly what happened," hopefully within 60 days, before she could address specific shortcomings or plans of action.
Members of Congress were not impressed.
"You're full of shit today," Rep. Nancy Mace (R–S.C.) told Cheatle, prompting calls from other committee members to "maintain decorum." Mace charged that the Secret Service had not provided any information the committee had requested—including a list of "all law enforcement personnel" present at the rally, audio and video recordings, and internal memos—despite being asked on July 15.
"You are being dishonest here with this committee," Mace continued. "We haven't gotten a single document or piece of information or data from you or your agency in [relation] to the rally, that we have asked you for."
"You've answered more questions with an ABC reporter than you have with members of Congress," Chairman James Comer (R–Ky.) noted before Mace began. "We have a lot more questions, the American people are demanding that we get answers to those questions, and that's what the purpose of this hearing is today. I strongly implore you to answer those questions."
And it wasn't just Republicans who took issue with Cheatle's testimony.
"[There are] elections happening across the country in about 100 days," noted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.). "The notion of a report coming out in 60 days, when the threat environment is so high in the United States, irrespective of party, is not acceptable….It has been 10 days since an assassination attempt on a former president of the United States; regardless of party, there need to be answers."
Cheatle noted that the rally stage was about 200 yards from the building where Crooks fired from. "The individual used an AR-15 in order to act out his assassination attempt," Ocasio-Cortez said. "An AR-15 has a range of about 400–600 yards. My question is, why is the Secret Service protective perimeter shorter than [the range of] one of the most popular semiautomatic weapons in the United States?"
"There are a number of weapons out there with a number of ranges," Cheatle responded. "A perimeter was established, and even though there were buildings that were outside of that perimeter—it wasn't just that building, there were a number of buildings in the area—there was overwatch that was created to help mitigate some of those buildings."
Despite Cheatle's unwillingness to give specifics, the hearing did glean some useful admissions: For example, Cheatle admitted to Mace that the events in Pennsylvania were "preventable" and constituted a "colossal failure."
This is not to say that no members of Congress used the opportunity to grandstand. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D–Mich.) used her allotted time to inveigh against "assault weapons," comparing the shooting in Pennsylvania to mass shootings in other parts of the country. "We just can't continue to allow this to happen," Tlaib said, calling on Congress to pass gun control legislation—even though the gun was purchased legally more than a decade ago, when the shooter was in elementary school.
Moments later, Rep. Tim Burchett (R–Tenn.) suggested that Cheatle only got her job because she was a woman: Referring to the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) framework that emphasizes considering applicants of diverse backgrounds, Burchett called Cheatle "a DEI horror story."
Still, it's encouraging to see lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognizing the enormous failure that took place last weekend, when law enforcement agents allowed an identified suspicious person to shimmy up to the top of a building with a long-range rifle and take multiple shots at a former president and major-party candidate.
In a letter released after the hearing, Comer and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D–Md.)—respectively the committee's chairman and ranking member—called on Cheatle to resign. The lawmakers charged that in her testimony, she had "failed to provide answers to basic questions regarding that stunning operational failure and to reassure the American people that the Secret Service has learned its lessons and begun to correct its systemic blunders and failures."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another board in the conspiracy scaffold: No audio recordings of the SS radio chatter.
Biden quit only after the assassination failed.
Now he’s too feeble to keep the story straight.
According to the war criminal bibi, Israel is “Americas greatest ally”. What America is he referring to?
The one that despises Nazis. Nazis like you Obergruppenfuhrer Misek.
You mean the America that advocates and funds the holocaust in Gaza that Israel is on trial for committing, has been ruled to stop, and to leave the occupied Palestinian Territories and to pay reparations?
Is that the America you think bibi the Israeli war criminal is referring to?
the bread is stale and nobody goes to the circus anymore it's all animal cruelty and weirdos.
Everyone needs to face reality - there is no accountability in the alphabet agencies. Congress will not get answers and neither will we. We can speculate, and maybe puzzle together some of the answers, but that's it.
One of the things that’s struck me recently is how all these bureaucrats have two bosses. The Prez appoints them, the Senate confirms them, yet when the shit hits the fan, Congress grills them … and nothing. Is the Prez their boss or not? If they have to answer to Congress, why doesn’t Congress fire their ass when they hem and haw?
Face it. The Prez is a useless middle man for all these agencies. Their heads come up with budget figures, give them to the President, he gives them to Congress, and Congress approves them. The Prez doesn’t dream up those figures, not for thousands of agencies, the agency heads do.
Get rid of the middle man. Congress has to confirm their appointments, so why not call that the interview that it is? If they screw up, Congress calls them in for a chit chat, why not let Congress threaten them with firing? Put some teeth in those hearings.
Even in military affairs, Congress has to approve all senior (flag rank?) promotions, they have to approve Joint Chiefs of Staff appointments, fleet admirals, NATO chiefs, all that shit. Don't they? Maybe I'm wrong. What the hell does the President add to it?
Nothing. He’s a damned useless third party.
The truth is that huge swaths of the permanent bureaucracy aren't answerable, practically, to anyone. For all the scare tactics around a "unitary executive", that's just the basics that we used to be taught in middle high-school civics - the president is the head of the executive branch and the bureaucracy is supposed to implement his directives. I get that that risks some degree of Congressional accountability. But, that's supposed to be managed through control of the purse strings and the drafting of laws, rather than reliance on administrative fiat. The better solution isn't to deal the president out of it, but to eliminate the administrative state.
Trump actually pointed this out. Biden never fired anyone.
Trump may be firing happy but at least he was involved.
So we're what, over 24 hours in and no one has even seen the President yet? Does this seem at all strange to anyone?
Huh, the President's brother released a statement saying he wants to enjoy "whatever time [Biden] has left" now that he's leaving office. Who talks like that if he's tanned, rested and ready for another four years of the presidency?
Yeah I noticed. I'm old enough to remember LBJ making a solemn address to the nation when he chickened out. Biden sends a memo? Did a guy with a syringe help him sign it? Is he one of the .02 of the population who actually died from Covid? This shit is getting weirder with every passing day and nobody is even talking about it?
Will they attempt to use his corpse as a puppet for the last few months of his term, without telling anybody?
He’s recovering from COVID and I would assume has doctor’s orders for strict bed rest so no photo opportunities. At his age, even if he’s been vaccinated, it’s a good idea. If we don't see him for another week, then I'll worry.
Using "his corpse as a puppet" would be no different from that past 3.5 years; just business as usual.
Have you ever tried telling a cop something? They never fking listen.
But this one's a head of security for a soft drinks and potato chip company.
Snipers don't go for Pepsi bottles. It's the oil cans they're after. Learned that from a Steve Martin documentary.
It wouldn't be a Reason article without some republican bashing. Rep. Burchett correctly identified this a consequence of DEI but Reason apparently doesn't want to hear it. Since when are libertarians for government mandated gender and race discrimination in hiring?
Reason bashes everyone, including libertarians. They've already started on Harris. They did Obama because he was president. They did Biden because he was president. They did Romney because he was running. They did Trump, well, because he's toxic. They've already done JD Vance, and they'll bash whoever Harris chooses as her VP president. They're anti-administration and don't assume the Republicans are being singled out unless you enjoy feeling sorry for yourself.
GFY
Reads like a new 50 center; shows up to post narratives.
It has been 10 days since an assassination attempt on a former president of the United States; regardless of party, there need to be answers.
Did anyone fact check her to point out it’s only been 9 days? We can’t keep letting this gross misinformation go unchecked.
The question in my mind is did the USSS 'accidentally on purpose' let Thomas Crooks take 8 shots at President Trump. It sure looks that way, given the incredible number of errors and their severity. And no daily investigation updates, combined with a strangely incurious MSM. This lady wanted to wait 60 days for a report to be generated to do anything? AYFKM?
Mayorkas tried to cover for her but I'm going to predict she's toast. When you lose Raskin and AOC even the View wackos and Morning Joe won't defend you. I watched a lot of the hearing and it was brutal.
Given the treatment of RFK Jr., I wouldn't be surprised at all if it was "accidentally on purpose" or worse. I might be inclined to believe the "failure" claim if the alphabet agencies were utterly upfront and forthcoming to a fault in the wake of it. But, what we see here is a long line of obvious and egregious deviations from basic procedures answered with a lot of handwaving and "silence peasants". If they weren't tangentially in on it, they're sure as hell doing an awfully good imitation of a regime that was.
They don't even try anymore.
Is the number 8 shots? I haven't even heard confirmation on how many rounds Crooks got off. I assume it's at least 3 (and wonder which one took the bullet that clipped Trump)
I do think the reps were being unprofessional and grandstanding in pushing for some information that can only be revealed in a closed session. That said, she had less information to share than anyone could find on twitter and she outright lied on multiple points.
I liked when MTG stunned her by asking for the name of the female in charge of the operation. Sounds like MTG has the name already, but the director gives a bs response
The simple answer is that the Secret Service has been degrading in quality for quite some time, becoming more and more lax. However, it has never come to a head before now due to a combination of luck, reputation, and having just that much manpower to brute force through their sloppiness.
The only thing that could realistically be accused of active misdeeds are the reductions in manpower, which might be penny-pinching. However, without the excessive people, it made the holes that much bigger.
A DEI hire that suddenly everyone is running from now that the consequences show up. How surprising.
Yeah, but Cheatle only checks two diversity boxes (female-ish, and stupid). In today’s competitive DEI world, you need at least 3 or 4 to get anywhere. Just look at the retard diversity muppet in Biden’s press room.
Breaking. Biden (allegedly) calls into the... Kamala campaign and pledges full support.
Of what value is support from a dementia patient ?
Dementia patient or deep fake. A story is being written. How will it end?
I honestly don't want to go down a rabbit hole and I'm not sure I have enough tinfoil in the house to make another hat. But. Every time I'm told to accept incompetence instead of animus it turns out my lying eyes were right all along. This assassination attempt has a strong stink of a well organised, but poorly executed, deep state operation. As we have seen for the last eight years the regime will stop at nothing to stop Trump. Anybody who doesn't acknowledge that assassination was on the table at least as a contingency just hasn't been paying attention.
You’re not the only one:
https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/16/bidens-team-deliberately-kneecapped-trumps-security-to-allow-an-assassination-attempt/
They kept the rooftop open, watched the shooter, kept Trump on the stage, and didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot. And we’re supposed to believe it was an innocent oopsie?
Occam's razor tells me they deliberately "let it happen."
And then this director's dissembling just adds to the suspicions; they no doubt did this to "save Democrat-cy."
I never used to be a conspiracy theorist, in fact always thought such people were just plain crazy; however, when you find that you're living in a banana republic, it's only sane to believe your lying eyes.
She noted that she was waiting on "a full and complete report of exactly what happened," hopefully within 60 days, before she could address specific shortcomings or plans of action.
Anyone want to bet that the answer will be more funding?
And more DEI!
Of course. Women are more in tune to potential threats from men, and would never have left the rooftop undefended.
Good thing AOC wouldn't stand for that. This sloppiness puts all candidates in danger, not just Trump.
Let us assume as true what another commenter said — “that the SS snipers were aware of the shooter and had him in their sights before he fired, but they did not shoot him first because they were trying to identify whether or not he was a threat.” In that situation the prudent thing to do — and as soon as the Secret Service noticed the gunman — would have been to whiz Trump away. Why take a chance? The Secret Service should err on the side of caution.
Yeah, there might be justification to not shoot at that point but at there was no justification to leaving the principal exposed at that point.
That and a flanking action should have been implemented before he had his rifle out. I've seen better security tactics from dive bar bouncers. I've had some encounters with secret service. I've seen them very quickly identify and shut down even the vaguest hints of anything threatening.
This was an intentional failing. It's impossible to believe that sworn agents on the ground could have acted so incompetently without direction
Intentional failing = "accidentally on purpose"
Yes, it does seem so, vs the clown car theory.
"You're full of shit today," Rep. Nancy Mace (R–S.C.) told Cheatle, prompting calls from other committee members to "maintain decorum."
See? Those deplorable crude MAGAs don't know how to do Democracy! like civilized people. Elites know how to fuck over entire nations and always look superior. The peasants just lose their shit and start hurling insults at their betters.
Paging Rev. Kirkland
her main duty was to help stage manage Joe Biden and keep his cognitive decline out of the public eye. That's no longer needed.
...Crooks fired multiple shots as Trump spoke....
Kind of odd that nine days later, we still don't know exactly how many shots he fired, or where they landed, or how they match up to the audio that was broadcast nationwide. Nor do we know how many shots the sniper(s) fired, and how many struck Crooks, or if any other shots were fired by law enforcement.
To me it sounded like a burst of 3 shots, then a burst of 5 shots that sounded different. On the day of the shooting I assumed Crooks fired 3 shots (which tracks with 3 spectators being hit, 1 possibly by the same bullet that grazed Trump's ear), and law enforcement/SS snipers fired 5 shots to "neutralize" him.
But I've since read that Crooks fired 8 shots, or 7 shots, or "as many as 8 shots," and that it took 26 seconds for him to be neutralized, when it seemed much faster than that live. The assumption now seems to be that one sniper fired one shot (which is enough), but 2 sniper teams had a view of him (although 1 team may have had to contend with a tree in their sightline).
Some radio recordings from the Secret Service on the day of the event might clear up some of those questions. If there were any:
https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/22/secret-service-director-claims-there-are-no-recordings-of-radio-traffic-from-trump-assassination-attempt/
Apparently, law enforcement fired 2 shots:
1 from a sniper with an obscured view, that killed Crooks.
1 from local law enforcement, that missed (no surprise there).
https://www.foxnews.com/us/sniper-killed-would-be-trump-assassin-one-million-shot-source
The Secret Service sniper who killed Crooks could only see Crooks’ gun scope and the top of his eye and forehead because the lip of the roof was blocking the sniper’s view.
To me it sounded like 8 shots, nothing at all like a burst, then one louder shot, presumably snipers shooting at the same time after the shooter stopped shooting because Trump was down.
I went back and listened to the video again.
There were 3 shots initially in 3 seconds, then a short break (2 seconds) and then 4 or 5 more shots in 3 seconds (maybe including return fire from law enforcement that missed?)
Then 15 seconds after the first shot a single shot was heard, which seems to be the SS sniper shot, because they took Trump away after that. I don't know where the "26 seconds" reported comes from.
Saw an audio analysis that I'll post later. 3 shots from the first location 5 from the second location 1 final shot from a third location. First 3 probably Crooks. The last probably the SS sniper. The other five unknown but probably fired from the ground. All of the shots within 15 seconds.
When you lose AOC...
She was pretty responsible. Her motion to impeach Justices Thomas and Alito was futile unless the Democrats regain control of the House. Thomas certainly deserves an impeachment inquiry. Alito seems a big stretch.
GFY Proggy swine
Hey Syd, where are you getting your talking points? How much do they pay you to come around and post the bullshit?
Had he used a hunting rifle and not an "assault weapon", he probably would have succeeded. The bullet wouldn't have been affected by the wind so much.
Agreed; a basic Savage bolt action with a 4-14 X 50 scope would have been much more effective for such a purpose, than the average AR. Add a tripod and it would have been difficult to miss at that range.