FCC Will Cap the Cost of Prison Phone Calls
The move would lower the per-minute cost precipitously and allow inmates to better keep in touch with friends and family.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted this week to lower the cost of keeping in touch with the incarcerated.
"The Federal Communications Commission today voted to end exorbitant phone and video call rates that have burdened incarcerated people and their families for decades," the agency announced in a Thursday press release. "The new call rates will be $0.06 per minute for prisons and large jails, $0.07 for medium jails, $0.09 for small jails, and $0.12 for very small jails, and as low as $0.11/minute for video calls—with a requirement that per-minute rates be offered." As a result, "the cost of a 15-minute phone call will drop to $0.90 from as much as $11.35 in large jails and, in small jails, to $1.35 from $12.10."
This affects more than just phone calls: "The new rules also, for the first time, address the exorbitant cost of video visitation calls, dropping those prices to less than a quarter of current prices and requiring per-minute rate options based on consumers' actual usage," per the announcement.
The FCC's three Democratic commissioners voted to approve the rules, as did Republican Commissioner Nathan Simington; Commissioner Brendan Carr, the remaining Republican, voted to approve the order in part and to concur in part.
In January 2023, President Joe Biden signed the Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act into law. The act clarified the FCC's authority to regulate the rates of in-state calls from prisons, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in 2017 that under existing law, the agency could only regulate calls that crossed state lines.
Many of the over 1.2 million Americans incarcerated at any given time depend upon prison calls to maintain ties to friends and family. "Research shows frequent phone calls to family members increase jail safety, promote positive mental health outcomes, and help maintain connections with loved ones," wrote Nicole Loonstyn and Alice Galley of the Urban Institute in 2023.
Part of the reason is distance: "A majority of parents in both State (62%) and Federal (84%) prison were held more than 100 miles from their last place of residence," according to a 2000 report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. When a loved one is incarcerated too far away, it's much easier to just pick up the phone.
But all too often, prison officials leverage their position to take advantage of desperate families. In a 2022 survey of four states, Peter Wagner and Wanda Bertram of the Prison Policy Initiative found that some prisons and jails charged as much as $8 for a 20-minute video call.
Earlier this year, two lawsuits accused Michigan sheriff's offices of banning in-person jail visits and forcing families to use phone calls and video chats, starting at $10 for a 25-minute video call. According to the lawsuits, the technology companies facilitating the calls enticed officials with over $200,000 per year, plus a 20 percent monthly commission from call revenue.
A 2015 Prison Policy Initiative report found that the trend of banning in-person contact in favor of video visitation was on the rise in county jails, where the majority of inmates have yet to be convicted of a crime and whose families are more likely to live locally.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Suddenly, and without explanation, phone service in jails is unreliable.
Suddenly, and without explanation, federal intervention into the market price of a thing is good.
What market? These were government-created and maintained monopolies owned by rent-seekers, often put in place through payments to the state, not anything at all like a functioning market.
Unlike many of the "monopolies" the government seeks to punish, this is a monopoly in the purest sense. Prisoners are allowed exactly two choices: use the service supplied by one government chosen vendor, or use nothing at all. A choice between using a vastly over-priced state service vs. using nothing at all is hardly a free market. Just to make it worse, vendors are not only allowed to set their own prices, they're allowed to offer "commissions" to those choosing the vendor. I'd love to hear an explanation of how that is anything other than a legalized kickback.
This seems like a very strange thing for the FCC to be regulating.
Might just be me.
Imagine how strange it is for a libertarian magazine to be celebrating it. I guess we could call this the 3rd amendment of the telephone system or something.
a libertarian magazine
What's that one out of the UK that actually seems to discuss libertarian issues? Because Reason sure as fuck isn't libertarian.
Every time I hear this kind of crap I find myself wondering if these commenters are reading the same thing I am. Especially since so many of these commenters seem to be excusing or endorsing expansions of state power.
What's so strange about applauding one branch of government limiting another branch's abuse of power? Last I heard, libertarians considered checks and balances features, not bugs.
Good for the Bidens
Shouldn't the FCC only have a say in interstate phone calls?
Good for FCC. We want prisoner to be rehabilitated and to rejoin family and friends. Keeping the line of communication open is critical and here I think in societies interest as a whole. It a little thing that will help.
If it’s a good thing, it should be free!
Or possibly mandatory phone calls would be better.
What kind of libertarian supports any price controls?
If calls are expensive, perhaps the government mandates paid eavesdroppers to make sure there's nothing illegal being discussed.
Or perhaps the government prisons dish out monopolies.
Whatever the cause, rest assured government is behind it, and that makes this article extremely stupid and useless.
Joe! Why didn't you try to find out why calls are expensive?
You're no libertarian. You're not even a reporter. You're a copy paster at best.
If only Ron DeSantis had banned the prison system from enacting a ban on masks!
If you can't bust the government-mandated monopoly, price controls are the next-best thing.
The kind of libertarian whose head isn't so far up their ass that they can't see that these "services" are monopolies approved and enforced by the state. Also, the kind that hears that the very state actors who dole out monopoly privileges get "commissions" from the monopolists and can't quite see this as anything other than a nominally legal kickback.
There's no "perhaps" about it. I don't see anything "stupid" about celebrating when one branch of government curbs abuses by another branch. I thought checks and balances were a good thing.
Good policy but I'm not sure why the FCC has jurisdiction to make this call. Seems like something the legislature should be forced to decide.
Maybe the FCC could ban rent increases to $55 for former convicts.
No, this is stupid. Inmates should always have available the means to communicate with their families. 24/7, free of charge. Part of the legitimate cost of housing our wards of the State under 8A. And we’re tech enough now that it can and should include videoconferencing.
That said – as I’ve mentioned before when I talk of prison reform – these should be one-way incoming calls only. If the families want to talk to the inmates – and there IS an approved caller list, which the callers have to apply and be approved to be on – they can call them, not the other way around. Inmates can receive calls, but the only outgoing call an inmate can make is to his attorney, and then it's a pre-recorded message for the attorney to arrange a jail visit.
And inmates have zero privacy in those calls. They’re recorded and screened by prison staff.
Then stick a tablet behind some plexiglass built into the cell, and let the cons Facetime as much as they want with whoever’s allowed/wants to call them. (Also gives them access to unlimited library and educational materials.) Seems a very easy concession and accommodation given we’re leaving them in that cell 24/7/365 until their sentence is up.
Inmate Dad would be able to watch his son’s baseball game live. Inmate Husband would be able to enjoy a meal at the same time as his wife. Inmate Son could virtually attend his mother’s funeral. Virtual Christmas morning. Appeal/Parole hearings are a cinch. There is NO reason we should be denying inmates this, when the tech is so available and so cheap and so easy these days.
BUT – this ONLY works if we accept ALL the prison reform. Which, again, means they go into a cell (one thoroughly re-imagined from the gray bar hotel we think of currently) and they don’t come out of it until their release/parole date. Try to adapt this to the current prison system, and it’ll just be abused/exploited in dangerous ways. And that’s no good.