Trump's Defiance of an Assassin's Bullet Reaffirmed Populist Appeal
Can the candidate turn crowd-pleasing nostrums into a program that will do more good than harm?

Famously molding the Republican Party in his populist image, Donald Trump's defining reach-the-people moment undoubtedly came with his response to the attempted assassination at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. He rose to his feet to pump his fist, prompting the crowd to break into a chant of "USA! USA!" The moment was captured in images, including iconic photos by A.P. photographer Evan Vucci that recorded blood streaming down the former president's face as the stars and stripes flew above.
It was strong stuff that likely cemented the once and, perhaps, future president's bond with voters often left cold by the old, small-government-ish GOP. The new version of the party is a very different organization, but it was changing long before the bloody day in Pennsylvania.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Populist Platform for the Republican Party
The 2024 Republican Platform is dedicated "to the forgotten men and women of America." Trump has used the term since his 2016 campaign and it's been adopted by his party as it becomes a vehicle for the candidate. The phrase is borrowed from a 1932 speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt, another wealthy man who morphed his party—Democrats, then—in a populist direction. He championed a large, activist government building an economy "from the bottom up" in an appeal to the working class.
FDR, in turn, repurposed the phrase from William Graham Sumner, a classical liberal whose "forgotten man" was "the simple, honest laborer, ready to earn his living by productive work" and who is forced by "the reformer, social speculator and philanthropist" to support those who "live at the expense of those who labor and produce." Unlike FDR, Sumner preferred a limited state that leaves people alone.
Trump's GOP splits the difference between FDR and Sumner, promising to "protect Social Security and Medicare with no cuts," but also "large tax cuts for workers, and no tax on tips!" Unlike Sumner, who saw protective tariffs "delivering every man over to be plundered by his neighbor," Trump advocates "baseline Tariffs on Foreign-made goods" to "protect American workers and farmers from unfair trade."
"That this 'forgotten' American could be used both to uphold and to dismantle liberalism suggests that this American political identity has never been especially fixed: Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative, but populist above all," Yale history professor Beverly Gage wrote in 2016.
In a document that mentions "workers" 15 times in 16 pages, the 2024 GOP Platform promises to "restore Prosperity, ensure Economic Security, and build a brighter future for American Workers and their families" with favorable trade rules, taxes, and immigration restrictions. The last Republican platform in 2016 also invoked "workers." But that document focused more on Sumnerian critiques of licensing, compelled union membership, and binding regulations that stand in the way of a free economy in which workers benefit. The Trump-era version explicitly puts workers at the forefront as beneficiaries of policies that are sometimes liberating and other times intrusive.
Changing Parties and Shifting Voters
This transformation has been noticed by voters who shift allegiances accordingly. Previously GOP-aligned businesspeople become Democrats, while blue-collar employees defy union leaders to vote Republican.
"Over time, we did see white working-class voters continue to move away from the Democrats. In some ways, Obama's 2008 election was a high point. Ever since then, they've been bleeding white working-class voters. That's really why Trump got elected," political scientist Ruy Teixeira, who once predicted The Emerging Democratic Majority, told NPR in 2022. "But I think what's underscored the potential overall class problem for the Democrats is the movement of nonwhite working-class voters away from the Democrats in recent period of time, particularly Hispanic working-class voters."
That shift marks a significant transformation of both major political parties.
"The ongoing development of the Democratic Party as a party not of labor but of socioeconomic elites, and the ongoing development of the Republican Party as a party not of business but of working class social conservatives represents a major, perhaps the major, American political development of the twenty-first century," according to a 2023 paper by Tufts University's Eitan Hersh and Sarang Shah of the University of California at Berkeley.
Championing populism won Donald Trump control of the Republican Party and seems to have kept him more than competitive in his 2024 effort to regain the White House—with a strong assist from Democrats' unsuccessful efforts to conceal Joe Biden's declining mental and physical health from the public. But finding that populism has been a winning strategy for winning political office isn't the same as saying it's a recipe for liberty and prosperity. Bad policy can be popular and still bad, often because it's less about analyzing problems and proposing solutions than about exploiting desires and animosities.
Populism Is a Muddle, Not a Program
"Populism is a political ideology that positions 'the people' as a morally just, good group in society, in contrast with other people who are elitist and out of touch with society," Georgetown University's Gábor Scheiring clarified last month. It's a grab bag of fears and resentments rather than a program.
"Populism isn't a Right-wing or Left-wing ideology. Populism isn't an ideology at all…It's about feelings, not ideas," P.J. O'Rourke wrote for the Cato Institute in 2021. "Populism isn't conservative or liberal, Republican or Democratic. But it is both MAGA and BLM, both QAnon and Antifa — AOC in a Boogaloo Boys Hawaiian shirt."
He pointed to the Greenback Party, which favored inflation in the late 19th century, and the explicit racism and economic interventionism of later populists as crowd-pleasing idiocy that won support.
"Populism is a muddle — a political, economic, and moral dog's breakfast," O'Rourke, who called out modern populism in both major parties, added.
Promising to give goodies to favored factions and to crush perceived enemies has proven a popular—and populist—strategy, but that doesn't make it well-considered, consistent, or fundamentally good. The current GOP platform exemplifies that, with vows to maintain expensive entitlements and cut taxes both. One or the other might be doable, but not both—but, boy, are they winners with voters.
Donald Trump has remade his political party and won new voters with a populist message. His tough and defiant response to an assassin's bullet most likely reaffirmed his appeal to many Americans. But the test will come after the election that he seems poised to win. Then we can see if he can turn crowd-pleasing nostrums into a program that will do more good than harm.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“It’s a grab bag of fears and resentments rather than a program.”
“Populism isn’t an ideology at all…It’s about feelings, not ideas”
Can we cut the shit? Are the major traditional parties not peddling “fears and resentments” and dressing them up to be “a program”? Didn’t we just spend 4 years blaming all the countries problems on the unvaxxed and ultra-MAGA republicans? Didn’t we just spend 4 years going over how not being on board with the party in power represents a threat to democracy?
The only “idea” or “plan” the major establishment parties represent are more power and money for themselves, and demonizing some other.
Lets not take the strategy from the left and go with “the people who dont agree with me are being DEFENSIVE, and REACTIONARY!” They are rejecting their overlords who have been shown to be corrupt and incompetent. I cant think of a better “idea” or “plan”
You know what the plan or "program" for most people with cancer is?....Beat cancer. Then you can figure out the next step after.
Libertarians for planned economies!
Libertarians for an elite oligarchy that just happen to be globalist and credentialed.
“It’s a grab bag of fears and resentments rather than a program.”
and then Mike Parsons proceeds to demonstrate that this claim is true
Just shocked you didn’t find a way to scream end of democracy, project 2025, Trump is hitler today.
I guess the safest leftist talking point at the moment is screaming populism will end the world.
We get it. You believe in a strong authoritariajz globalist, one size fits all system of control over those dumb people. If only those people would shut up and vote how you want them to.
Your view of people being told what to do and how to act isnt libertarian.
Youre not elite. Youre actually quite dumb. Conned into believing if you agree with the credentialed globalist it makes you intelligent. It does not.
Radical individualists for the elites!
Didn’t we just spend 4 years blaming all the countries problems on the unvaxxed and ultra-MAGA republicans?
Nope. It was 7 years.
exactly – and otherwise he nailed the glaring unobserved populism of the current mouthpieces for globalist elitism. And what is climate alarmism but just another incarnation of populism targeted at people who adore scienticians like Bill Nye because they feel smarter after watching him.
Outside of that, however - I gotta say the article wasnt too bad in tone or condemnation TDS.
Tuccile has been crying in his soy milk for 36 hours straight
Nardz, it’s soy juice. There is no soy ‘milk’ because there is no soy titty, now is there? Of course, saying ‘soy juice’ makes you want to throw up a little in your mouth.
Tucille is a regime cuck spewing regime speak. Their words have no meaning.
YOU HEAR THAT PLEBES?
Renounce your whiteness, then hush up and eat your bugs and transition your kids and get rid of your gas powered freedom mobile, we can’t have your grab bag of populist notions interfering with our stewardship.
One is left to wonder why appealing to the populace, called 'Populism', is a bad thing in a representative Democracy.
One might just as easily say that's 'doing their fucking job'.
Now, if they are like FDR and simply say they are for the little guy while actively lying and making their lives worse, sure, call them out for that.
As much as I might dislike the Democrats and Republicans, they should both listen to their fucking voters desires right? Democrats and Republicans both claim that's what they are doing, but neither of them actually do and I think that's pretty damn clear which also happens to be the appeal of Trump to a whole lot of people.
Weirdly, I don't think anyone really believes Biden is actually listening to his voters. He is far more like FDR than Trump is, in that he claims to listen to them but frequently does the opposite of what they actually want. That may be a good thing to me, because I happen to think they are retarded, but why the fuck would you vote for Biden if you're actually a far left Marxist? What is the appeal there when he consistently sides with the richest of the rich doner class types?
As for Trump, it seems to me that Republicans are mad at him for not doing that. He already is one of those 'richest of the rich donor types' only he cut out the middle man and decided to run for office himself. That takes some brass balls right there.
...
...was never more so than in the Trump presidency. Reason writers have lamented the passing of such an entity since...forever. Maybe most of the problem is mistaking rhetoric for action. When it came to actually getting things done, Trump achieved what pro-GOP opinion leaders have been opining on or promising for decades. It's as if all that promising was previously taken as a done deal, but now that it's done, you're pretending like it still needs doing and is no longer in the offing!
The author claims that Trump is a populist and then writes hundreds of words explaining that populism is not in fact a unified governing philosophy and no one even knows exactly what it is. The alternative he offers is small government Republicans which mostly exist only in his imagination. Instead of trashing Trump with a meaningless pejorative, populism, I'm much more interested his policy track record which as I recall looked a lot like peace and prosperity.
Don't forget the unending warcrimes of mean tweets and rude remarks about journalists thet straight up lied about him.
2Chili pines for the good old days of the Goldwater Administration.
If only.
Trump achieved what pro-GOP opinion leaders have been opining on or promising for decades.
Spending trillions to fund lockdowns?
And he did nothing else. We get it.
Perfection is not the enemy of good. Dem governors had no say. Congress has no say. We get it.
Are you expecting another pandemic? Why laser like focus on a one time global event and ignoring the entire time preceding it?
Eunuchs hate virility
Spending trillions to fund lockdowns?
The horse is dead, and irrelevant.
Not to TDS-addled shit-piles.
Sure, and by the 2020 election he was the clear choice on turning down the COVID hysteria and getting back to work. I think that matters.
Corporate media says populism is a dirty word so it has to be bad. Power of the people is the opposite of control by the elite, so it is bad.
Amazing to see.
I think an honest read of this article shows it leaves this idea as an open question. If not for a history of obvious implication towards Trump and the GOP in general I'd say it was muted w.r.t. that.
"Can the candidate turn crowd-pleasing nostrums into a program that will do more good than harm?"
Well, he did the first time.
^this^ is what I was thinking!
The headlines posted by the legacy media were beyond ludicrous. Entirely and deliberately leaving out the gunshots and the bullet that grazed trump's ear.
They have no shame and they don't care what you think of them.
CNN, MSNBC, N.Y. Times and WaPo are useless rubbish as bad as any super market tabloid. Even worse, people actually believe that crap.
populism won Donald Trump control of the Republican Party and seems to have kept him more than competitive in his 2024 effort to regain the White House—with a strong assist from Democrats' unsuccessful efforts to conceal Joe Biden's declining mental and physical health from the public
I'd prefer how I imagine Molly Hemingway would put that....
....with a strong assist from journalists and other Democrats' unsuccessful efforts to conceal Joe Biden's declining mental and physical health from the public
"Trump injured by an unknown object after disturbance and popping sounds at rally." Those are actual reports (combined from various sources.)
"FBI confirms incident at Trump rally was assassination attempt" -- that was reported yesterday, as if we were still wondering.
Is the woman in front a secret service agent?
The one adjusting her sunglasses? Sadly, yes.
(D)iversity! It wouldn't be Equitable if she weren't Included!
A far cry from Clint Eastwood. Or Rene Russo.
I've watched the videos from the assassination attempt several times. I noticed how out of place the female SS agents seemed. The video of the SS putting Trump in the SUV were telling. The female agents seemed not to know what to do. At one point you see one of them repeatedly trying to return her handgun back to its holster, but couldn't find it. There is another one in a different video who's walking around with her gun at the ready, flagging civilians. This was after Trump was secured in the vehicle. Lastly, did anyone else notice that every single female SS agent was overweight? Shouldn't physical fitness be a must if you are going to be working bodyguard duty for the President (or former President) in the Secret Service?
Then I hear the head of the SS instituted a quota system to try to get 30+% female representation in the SS. I wonder if standards were lowered to try to achieve that stupid goal. Just kidding, you know they had to lower standards to try to get to that goal, just as military, police, and firefighters have done so. Diversity is our strength. Strength and mission readiness certainly isn't our strength now.
According to one report I saw the agents on duty were less experienced substitutes - presumably desk bound duties. Trump’s regular security detail allegedly had been on duty continuously for weeks and were temporarily rotated out for rest and personal time.
Another report claims that more experienced agents were diverted to handle security for an event featuring Jill Biden.
It must have been really difficult to vomit out the most inane partisan take about the assassination attempt at Trump's life... but Toosilly managed!
Sullum hasn't spoken yet.
Can Tuccille become other than a TDS-addled slimy pile of shit? Fuck off and die, asshole.
It was his Teddy Roosevelt moment. Trump saying “Fight, fight, fight” was very historically reminiscent of “You can’t kill this Bull Moose!”
“It was strong stuff that likely cemented the once and, perhaps, future president’s bond with voters often left cold by the old, small-government-ish GOP”
Just stop. This delusion that the Pre-Trump Republican Party was a small government-ish party has no basis in reality yet you guys keep repeating it. If the GOP was actually a small government party before Trump there wouldn’t had been the need for a Tea Party Movement.
Words from the neocons mean more than actions from anyone else. A perfect foil against the dems to allow the dems to keep marching left.
Just stop. This delusion that the Pre-Trump Republican Party was a small government-ish party has no basis in reality yet you guys keep repeating it
Reason writers long for the Pre-Trump Republican Party for the same reason the fucking Democrats do: before Trump the GOP was the go along to get along, rolling over, controlled opposition to the American Left and their batshit economic policies and social agendas.
Well it was fun while it lasted. After this weekend, it looks like the uni-party might be put back on hold for a couple years, assholes.
It’s like they forgot the entirety of both Bush administrations and Nixon to boot.
Wait, you mean the Tea Party wasn't a bunch of racists formed against Obama? Have we been lied to?
Holy fuck! Cannon just DISMISSED the documents case. Says Jack Smith is not a legitimate prosecutor.
Great. More jeff and sarc freakouts.
Don’t worry, I’m already popping the popcorn.
as precious as the tears of allah !
TDS-addled shits' tears are wonderful to behold!
not only that!...
MSNBC yanks anti-Trump 'Morning Joe' off air following assassination attempt
...for today...
If they're retooling the show maybe they should replace those two clowns with one bigger one... .Bill O'Reilly. Now THAT would be a paradigm shift!
Typical J.D. typically wrong.
J.D. did you ever think that it might be the Liberal Socialist take over of the Democrat Party that's causing the changes?
small-government-ish GOP
The same GOP you yourself have been BOWF SIDEZ!ing for the last 16 yrs.? You are become the abyss.
Seriously, this is the same, retarded
don’t ask questions, just consume product and then get excited for next products'ignore my previous statements and anachronistic mirrored projection bullshit and accept my current anachronistic mirrored projection bullshit' that ENB pulls. Where GOPers have a nostalgically, inaccurate conception of the 50s but we need to make sure that they don’t enact or repeal laws to turn it back to the 50s-era Christian Utopia that you just said didn’t exist.I almost feel sorry for the people you’ve swindled to pay you to tilt at your own windmills.
A populist, anti-establishment re-alignment was inevitable. The dominant class in the West, including America, is not the bourgeoisie. It's been the managerial technocracy for a long, long, time. And their dominance has been secured, politically, through an alliance, not with the working class, but with the underclass. Increasingly, the post-bourgeois proletariat and the bourgeois remnant have aligned interests. And those interests are at odds with those of the dominant managerial technocracy. Put simply, the managerial technocracy has an impressively long record of abject failure with little consequence to them for said failures.
The 1933 Ladies' Home Journal article noted: But Hitler without the mass is nothing, he is pushed along from below. The frustrations he expresses surge toward a new Germany, whose device is not the black eagle but the under dog rampant...
Tucille is a blithering idiot.
Apparently, Reason has re-discovered the unprincipled politicians who pander to the crowds and has baptized them "Populists".
Pandering and Populism are synonyms.
When Reason re-discovers mirrors, they will recognize their pandering to progressives. I wonder what they will call that "discovery".
Looters are like dogs. Walking your dog past less fortunate dogs penned in yards, observe that they notice only one another. Human pedestrians are like wraiths to them. So unwashed populi bark and snarl at the other pack of po-pos clumsily initiating force the WRONG way. Both collectives agree the initiation of force is the Supreme Ideal, but to each its own form of coercion is "the" correct one. Removing women's rights from the LP platform has attracted the more superstitious mob to what was once the proud voice of Libertarian Reason. Libertarians like Tuccille are now the new wraiths.
I find it hilarious that the American Left has a problem with “populism” now that it applies to DJT.
They had no problem with it all when it elevated a psychotic Marxist from Vermont into a presidential primary, or put “The Squad” on the cover of Rolling Stone.
Probably because populism did none of those things.
Bernie and the squad are the product of wealthy socialists.
Not the people.
Populism Is a Muddle, Not a Program
Populism isn't supposed to be a program. It's a sentiment.
Libertarianism, for instance, isn't a program, it's a set of guiding principles.
Anne McCormick also noted in 1933 that "This was his constituency: dispossessed who hated capitalists, hated Jews because they prospered, hated socialists because they governed." Ironically, it was Herbert Hoover's prohibitionist fanaticism exported to favor French and British over German pharma corporations that empowered Christian National Socialism. Here it was the Nixon-Reagan-Biden sequel banning everything everywhere except gin and cigarettes. South America's economies collapsed by 1992, refugees fled.
Wring your hands about populism all you want; totalitarian globalism is the real threat.
Populism may or may not work out well for the country. But the ruling class’s long-desired one-world government globalism is GUARANTEED permanent technocratic human slavery for all but the Anointed Global Elites.
(OK, fine, and maybe a few perks for their most loyal and high-ranking acolytes, as long as those acolytes shut up and do exactly what they’re told, and believe what they’re told, with unquestioning obedience… even the stuff that contradicts what they were told, nay, *demanded* to believe… just yesterday!)
So, between the stupid buffoonish a-hole and the boot stomping on a human face forever, I guess give me the crass, gormless oaf (Would’ve preferred to vote Libertarian, but Chase Oliver is just a Xiden clone with maybe less gun-grabbing; and RFK-Jr is just a gun grabbing climate cultist typical lefty who apparently thinks that ONLY vaccine companies are the problem).
* Edited to add: Give me the *ORANGE* crass, gormless oaf because without the “orange” qualifier, I guess that describes both of them at this point!
* Edited a second time: Forgot Xiden is orange now too. Give me the orange crass, gormless oaf who got shot last Friday.
Saturday.
Hank got a new handle?
Trump's Defiance of an Assassin's Bullet
How DARE he!
That photo is badass. That alone should move polls 5-10 points
Can the candidate turn crowd-pleasing nostrums into a program that will do more good than harm?
No.
Can SRG post more intelligently than turd?
No.
>>In some ways, Obama's 2008 election was a high point.
struggling to find one.
Kept McCain away from the nuclear codes.
Populism is offering the voters what they are asking for (which is why populism is so concerning to the globalist elites who have their own plans they want to implement.)
When Trump first ran in 2016, someone polled likely voters what their top issue was. Out of the top 50 responses, "climate change" didn't make the list. Illegal immigration/border security was the top issue, but no other candidates were making it the centerpiece of their campaign.
"the old, small-government-ish GOP."
The previous two GOP nominees were Mitt Romney and John McCain. The GOP establishment's preferred candidate in 2016 was Jeb Bush. The old GOP was about war and aristocracy. "Small government" was relegated to people like Ron Paul who was booed at debates.
If the GOP has taken a populist turn, it might be worth examining that the GOP has been polluted for decades by elites without a clue what normal life is like, and makes no effort to care. Trump doesn't either, but at least pretends to understand that it's a problem.
FDR's forgotten man was the guy looking for something for nothing and expected the government to get it for him. His programs were designed to grow that demographic to ensure New Deal Dems were never turned out of office.
The real forgotten man is the sucker who is tasked with paying for it.
I don't care about the populism. It didn't earn him my vote the last time, or the time before that.
He has three months to give me a real, legitimate, articulate, specific plan to dragnet this nation and punt its illegals out the door, ideally with some kind of tracking implant that'll go off if they try to recross the border again. I want to know how he's going to do it, and have the opportunity to consider whether it'll work.
I'm not asking for perfect - but there's a plan that could reduce the illegal alien population in this nation by 70-85%, and it's feasible, then he'll get my vote. And I've even stopped caring if it's 100% humane.
Like, a tax-credit bounty for Americans - all the way to zero burden - who provide verified information that leads to captured illegals. Pit the Americans against the illegals, and reward the Americans for their efforts.
Like, rounding said illegals up and stuffing them in shipping containers to be parachuted over the furthest and/or inhospitable parts of their COO's to frustrate any attempt at a trek back. None of this temporary housing nonsense. You're caught, you're verified illegal, you're packed into a C-5 Galaxy and air-dropped somewhere over the Amazon Jungle.
Like, immediately terminating all open immigration court cases - flat denial of all of them. And shutter all the immigration courts until the situation is back under control and the border is secured.
I don't care if I see 1,000,000 new photos that remind me of Elian Gonzalez. I don't care anymore. This isn't a careful surgery in a sterile room anymore. This is old sawbones field triage. If you gotta amputate to excise the illegals, amputate away.
Can the candidate turn crowd-pleasing nostrums into a program that will do more good than harm?
spoiler alert: no.
Can the candidate turn crowd-pleasing nostrums into a program that will do more good than harm?
He did before.
The first Trump presidency was one of peace and prosperity.
No matter how much you pretend that's not so, you want it back too.
Love the Lou Costello impersonator SS Agent
Biden claimed that he would unite the country with his words and then with his actions went out of his way to foster disunity and attack his political opposition and anyone who voted against him and made their opinions known.
I'm not claiming that Trump will unite the country, but as a person how has not and will not vote for Trump don't see Trump as the person causing disunity.
I see in Trump a person who was cherry picked to lose in 2016 so Hillary Clinton would have an easy election. Their plan failed and Trump won. Trump was handled with kid-gloves until he had secured the nomination and since then he has been vilified.
Trump often does not help himself, but the endless attacks have been astounding. It is obvious that the democrat ruling elitists are pulling out all the stops and playing ever dirty trick. Twisting and perverting laws, distorting and lying to get their way.
Trump claims that there is a witch hunt and even though he might be paranoid at times, essentially he is correct. Based on the behavior of the democrat ruling elitists, corporate media, and aspects of the government agencies it is no surprise that "conspiracy theories" are popping up. Some of the "conspiracy theories" have been proven either true or partially true, so lack of confidence is only natural.