Tennessee Woman's 'Fuck Em' Both 2024' Sign Is Protected Speech, Rules District Court
The town of Lakeland will have to refund Julie Pereira $688 in fines and fees and pay her $1 in nominal damages for violating her First Amendment rights.

A federal judge has ruled a Tennessee woman can't be fined for saying what we're all thinking, even if it's in the form of a yard sign.
This past week, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee ruled that the town of Lakeland, Tennessee, violated resident Julie Pereira's First Amendment rights when it fined her for placing a "Fuck Em' [sic] Both 2024" sign in her yard.
According to her First Amendment lawsuit filed last month, Pereira's sign "simply and cogently" expressed her own opinion that neither major party candidate was an acceptable choice for president. A Lakeland code enforcement official disagreed, slapping Pereira with daily fines of $50 for violating the city's prohibition on "obscene" signs.
The city only stopped fining Pereira after she covered the u on her sign with tape. By that point, she'd wracked up $688 in fines and other fees because of her sign.
But, unwilling to either pay those fees or dilute the "potency" of her message, Pereira sued the city of Lakeland for violating her First Amendment rights.
"In the interest of protecting not only my rights, but all citizens in the state of Tennessee this case has been taken to the next level because of its constitutional impacts," she wrote on Facebook, per the New York Post's reporting.
In a brief, three-page ruling, the U.S. district court agreed with Pereira. The court barred the city from taking any further enforcement action over her sign and instructed the city to reimburse Pereira for the fines she'd paid, plus $31,000 in attorneys fees, and $1 in nominal damages for having her constitutional rights violated.
Few local governments would try to police someone's political speech, however profane, if it was expressed on social media or in a newspaper. Yard signs are a different story, however.
Governments are much more willing to regulate owners who are trying to add an expressive element to their own properties, be it a colorful political sign or a fun mural on the side of a local business.
Pereira's victory is a reminder that signs are still speech and that freedom only works if you have a space to use it.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Where can I get one of those signs ? Lol.
Where can I get a tee shirt to go with my “Literally Anybody Else 2024” tee shirt?
ETA: Oh. Right here. Restores my faith in America.
https://tshirtatlowprice.com/products/fuck-em-both-24-america-can-do-better-than-this-t-shirt/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/25/texas-name-change-election-candidate
My first thought also.
Yes! I want one! Or ten!
$30,000 in legal fees, $1 for the plaintiff
But hey, she “won”.
That’s about the only kind of win you can hope for.
I guess I can keep my "Fuck Joe Biden and Whitmer sign in the front window.
Please keep your Whitmer fucking Joe Biden sign in the backyard though.
If only Sugarfree were still around.
I guess the city fucked itself.
what we’re all thinking
Does this “we” include Stormy Daniels, Ashley Biden, and Tara Reade? Or is thinking of these women when uttering a message like this too crude even for locker room talk?
Note: E. Jean Carroll intentionally omitted.
E. Jean Carrol: “Rape is sexy.”
She said that on CNN.
“I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait,” Trump said. “When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.”
Sounds like they were made for each other. Too bad for her that in her younger days, she looked like the wife he said was "boring".
Just wondering how this is legally different from the Biden administration having social media shut down speech.
Other then the whole monetary fines thing, of course.
How the f*ck can this cost $31,000 in legal fees? And probably another $31K on the town's side.
At $150 an hour (which would be a bit below average for competent attorneys in my area), that's only 200 hours of work or so. 5 person-weeks of work to take and win a case with constitutional implications. That's astonishingly quick and easy.
Mind you, it shouldn't have required more than 1 attorney-hour because as soon as the city's counsel saw this situation, he/she should have told the city government that they were absolutely going to lose and that they should immediately reverse course and apologize.
he/she should have told the city government that they were absolutely going to lose and that they should immediately reverse course and apologize.
Government isn't limited by things like life and death. They can appeal and countersue for like literally ever.
And they have to. The alternative is admitting to being wrong, and that it so much worse than anything else out there.
There's nothing people in power fear more than honesty and the truth.
$150 / hr? Not a chance.
For a little local matter - $350/hr
When the Rams settled with the city of St. Louis over the improper location, the lawyers got like $230 million. Not even going to trial
Federal courts have expensive fees. Lawyers have expensive fees. It adds up quickly.
Anyone with that sticker would be attacked and cornered by the Trump faithful in the comments for being a leftist. Because anyone who criticizes Trump, directly or indirectly, is a leftist who needs to be destroyed.
Attack!!!!!!!!!!
Have you ever had an original thought?
'Fuck Em' Both 2024′
Clearly she's a leftist progressive.
Jesus, just stop with the sarcasmins!
Was a jury involved? $1 seems a bit less than a jury would have imposed.
Or is this a case of f*ck the 7th Amendment?
content warning/NSFW/content warning/NSFW/content warning/NSFW:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdS0c-_-Q6s
That's all she asked for. It was to make a point, not personal enrichment.
Well, here is a tiny bit of good news.
US troops withdraw from first base in Niger
https://thehill.com/newsletters/defense-national-security/4760924-us-troops-withdraw-from-first-base-in-niger/
I'm not sure why US soldiers were in Niger in the first place. Glad that they are coming home.
You like Houthis attacking US shipping, and beating back the US navy? We were in Niger to address that. Now the Russians will help the Houthis directly attack US flagged ships. Nice.
I don't want the US to be in Niger either. There are no good choices.
???
The Houthis are in Yemen, on the Arabian Sea, so all shipping through the Suez Canal must pass within a few miles. Niger is not only most of the way across Africa from Yemen, it's a landlocked country. Whatever the reason for the US military support of Niger, it wasn't concern about shipping being attacked from several hundred miles inland.
I would assume it has to do with Islamic extremism in west Africa. But I would assume we had better relations with Liberia or Nigeria. Perhaps a favor to the French or mitigating the Libya clusterfuck?
Yes, so great that now that we are gone, Niger is free to sell their yellowcake uranium to the Iranians. If it doesn't warm your heart now, just wait to the Iranians shoot off a bomb.
So here we go, the official RNC platform.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4760251-read-rnc-panel-approved-trump-centric-platform/
Item #1: SEAL THE BORDER, AND STOP THE MIGRANT INVASION
Item #2: CARRY OUT THE LARGEST DEPORTATION OPERATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY
You can't pretend that Republicans don't want mass deportations anymore.
Who was pretending?
Who’s complaining?
Yeah, I don't get it. We've had the largest number of illegal crossings in the history of the solar system, which will require a huge deportation effort to set that right. Like, Obama-levels of deportation.
Mass deportations....like Pres Obama did?
They never once pretended otherwise.
A mass deportation is an unfortunate necessity.
" for saying what we're all thinking,"
Speak for yourself, asshole.
They need to prosecute the code enforcer guy. 18 USC 242.
This is NOT a victory, it was a judges SCAM. The award should have been at least 250K. They knew or should have known that 1A was being violated and they had to have legal training regarding 1A.
The $1 is a slap in the face to ALL citizens, it states to the Government Agents that they are immune and that there is NO cost to violating 1A at any time.
The only way to stop government from violating rights is to make sure they can no longer fund doing so. 250K is a minimum, 5 millions is actually reasonable