Review: Is Fallout Actually a Good Game-to-TV Crossover?
Staying true to the game, producers of the Amazon show even leave room for side quests and open-ended exploration.

Settings and storylines that make for good gameplay rarely lend themselves to compelling plots and filmable universes. So it's pretty amazing that Amazon's new Fallout series manages to be faithful to the aesthetics and vibe of the video games on which it's based while also working as a fun and enjoyable (albeit gruesome and bizarre) action-adventure show.
The show, like the games, is set in a nuke-ravaged wasteland formerly known as the United States, where 1950s camp bleeds into Wild West gunslinging and ultraviolent post-apocalyptic gore-horror. The plot follows the intersecting stories of Lucy, a "vault-dweller" who leaves her intergenerational fallout shelter to search for her kidnapped father, Maximus, an ambitious "squire" out to make a name for himself in a militaristic order of religious knights, and "the ghoul," a radiation-ravaged ex-human blessed/cursed with an extra-long life span.
All these characters are on a mission, and the show definitely has a story to tell. The series nevertheless leaves enough room for the side quests and open-ended exploration that help make the game experience so rich.
The one real let-down is the show's big reveal, involving an incredibly silly, borderline nonsensical capitalist conspiracy. It's a testament to the show's other strengths that this too can be mostly absorbed and dismissed with an eye roll.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Goggins made the series.
100%
Never played the game.
TV series is solid, not spectacular.
The girl is good.
Walton Goggins phones it in, but he's still the man.
Maximus is an awful character played by an awful actor who ruins every scene he's in.
I think that's a pretty solid summation.
No, it isn’t.
The completely unnecessary tranny is especially stupid.
The mascot for vault tec turning into a ghoul with super powers, also especially stupid. (I thought the slow mo targeting was enabled by interfacing with the pip boy).
Evil capitalists plotting to destroy the world so they can conduct scientific/sociologic experiments on the population, moronic.
The 3 converging plotlines…
Everything about it was terrible except for the girl and the sets.
No idea why the hard on for goggins. His acting is just as bad as everyone else’s. Those guys above must have been the shield fanboys.
Fuck off, Jeff. Go be an cunt with someone elses nick.
It’s really funny to watch you get angry at being impersonated. Really really really funny.
Especially because it’s hard to tell the difference.
Isn't one of the core concepts of the game series how laughably evil Vault Tec is?
Yes. Pretty much every vault is a science experiment using the inhabitants as test subjects. I think the only exception is Vault 76, which was mentioned in Fallout 3 and then used for the MMO.
In the games, there were a few "control" vaults, like the protagonists' vaults from Fallout 1 and 3, and the source of Vault City in 2. So it makes sense.
The issue I have with this explanation is that with this explanation, we should have more mostly-functional vaults with rational systems of government rather than what we see in the games, where the vast majority are some absurd experiment that resulted in everyone dying in horrible ways.
The Vault 31-33 idea is a clever one (and arguably not evil at all), and this would fit the idea of Vault 11 too, and maybe 34 and 21 (okay I like New Vegas). How could this possibly result in Vault 19, which was designed to maximize paranoia?
Starting w/ F3, yes. In F1 and F2 they were pretty generic.
Still a lot better than this season of The Boys.
Well, the thing is that Vault-Tec has been comically evil since the very first game. Most of the experiments in the vaults are absurd, mustache twisting evil, and fail predictably and spectacularly, and wouldn't even work as experiments because there's no one left to catalogue their results.
The idea that they are supposed to be prototypes for the best society created by idle rich idiots gives an actual motivation behind the vaults and some overarching reason behind the madness. Whether you prefer it over the just "evil for the sake of evil" of the original is a matter of taste.
And I do think that the Brotherhood plot was well integrated into the search for dad story, while the Ghoul's plot was to act as a monkey wrench in both of these. The only things that I really disliked was the ridiculous scenario in the finale that enabled the dad to leave and the fact that the brotherhood and NCR didn't even try to negotiate. While it was a good dramatic scene over how war never changes, it didn't make much sense in-story as the NCR would have been far better off talking it out, making Moldaver's last stand seem ridiculous.
I've been playing the Fallout games for years, definitely one of the best video game franchises out there. I thoroughly enjoyed the first season of the show, though I'm not sure about where they're taking things with Vault Tec and the war.
As bad as Amazon's LOTR series was (it was so bad I can't remember the name and don't care to look it up), I was a bit wary about this one, but while there were a few 'agenda' things worked into the Fallout show, they were subtle enough to be easily ignored.
It's amazing what happens when you have good writers that understand storytelling. Lucy is a relatable heroine without being a ridiculously overpowered 'girl boss'. The male characters are allowed to have their own strengths and weaknesses without being reduced to two dimensions.
She's a bit of a Mary Sue, but they explain that in the first episode. She's also hopelessly naive and physically weaker than most of the other characters she meets.
Maximus isn’t Lacy’s father. Maximus is indeed a squire who wants to be a knight (or becomes one?). Played by a black guy. Not related to Lucy at all, about her same age.
Lucy’s father is Hank, played by Kyle MacLachlan.
ETA: Oh. Maybe that sentence simply calls for semi-colons. As written, it says Maximus is her father.
It is certainly a poorly constructed sentence and an appalling use of comas.
When Hank was in suspended animation for whatever number of decades, I wonder whether that counts as a coma.
Yeah, I thought that too the first time I read it. She looks nothing like Maximus. She does look sort of look like Kyle MacLachlan, but in a less punchable sort of way.
This sums up the game franchise and the show:
https://youtu.be/zEqkkOmJG8s
It ain't perfect, but it's pretty darn good.
Fallout 2 is best fallout.
New Vegas
I will fight you on this.
Oh, that's easy - no, no it is not.
Everyone in the show is a moron acting moronically and things just happen.
Well that was also true of Lost, and that show was pretty good (at first anyway.)
It's woke, it's broke.
Describing something as "woke" is no more descriptive than calling it "cliche". It's a lazy shorthand that means nothing. Give some description.
1) Female lead. No. Yea, you can be a chick in Fallout. Its primary audience was not one.
2) Deviating significantly from the established plot in order to resonate with current social mentality.
3) The whole show had disregarded canon and lore to try and serve something beyond a very particular fanbase (see also: Star Wars).
4) You can appeal to a fanbase, or you can try wide-market DEI appeal. Don't do the latter.