Republicans Upset by Trump's Conviction Should Embrace Criminal Justice Reform
The MAGA movement has suddenly discovered the evils of politicized prosecutions, inequities in the justice system, and fear of police abuse.

As a general rule in politics and public policy, I'd suggest applying one's principles as consistently as possible. It's hard to be taken seriously if, say, you want the feds to prosecute your political opponents on some ill-defined charges—and then complain about the "weaponization" of the justice system when you or your allies are in the dock. Just saying.
One of my oft-stated warnings for those, on the Left or Right, who advocate for new laws, more regulation, and broader powers for police agencies: First consider how these powers might be wielded in the hands of your enemies. Many "well-intentioned" laws have been twisted in ways that the authors never envisioned. Sometimes the reasons are nefarious, other times the result of bureaucratic inertia.
During the 1980s War on Drugs, the U.S. Department of Justice created civil asset forfeiture laws that empowered the government to grab the property of drug cartels. It quickly became a means for police agencies to steal cars and cash from ordinary Americans, many of whom had never been convicted of or accused of a crime. The criminal justice reform movement has been trying to reform those and other unjust laws for years, but governments are amazingly resistant to change.
But perhaps that movement is ready to welcome a large group of Americans who previously had shown little interest in the inner workings of the justice system. Now that former President Donald Trump is a convicted felon—and faces other state and federal charges in a variety of prosecutions—the Make America Great Again movement has suddenly discovered the evils of politicized prosecutions, inequities in the justice system, and fear of police abuse. MAGA hasn't gotten the requisite takeaways yet, so I'm spelling it out for them.
Before Trump showed up on the political scene, the nation was heading toward a new consensus about the criminal justice system. The forfeiture issue had become a bipartisan concern given its abuses. Liberal groups had long complained about police abuse, but prominent conservatives also came to realize that bad policing costs taxpayers a lot of money and undermines good policing. Incarceration levels and costs soared, which provided impetus for change.
However, Trump's 2016 election polarized the electorate. The excesses of Black Lives Matter and "defund the police" hardened the battle lines, especially after protests and riots following George Floyd's death in Minneapolis. COVID-19 struck and crime rates increased. Conservatives went all in on "backing the badge." We found ourselves in the same old place, with little room for bipartisan anything.
Trump made matters worse with his rhetoric. There was the time he joked to a crowd of police officers that they shouldn't protect suspects' heads when putting them in squad cars. He denies it now, but Trump seemed to encourage crowds to chant "lock her up" referring to Hillary Clinton. It's hard to keep track of the number of officials MAGA supporters have wanted to lock up, with U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's (R–Ga.) comments to Anthony Fauci the latest example.
The Mueller report "shows Mr. Trump trying to wield the power of law enforcement to target a political rival, a step that no president since Richard M. Nixon is known to have taken," The New York Times summarized. But that was then and this is now. With Trump feeling the sting of a jury (albeit after a local prosecution rather than a federal one) maybe his minions will rethink their inconsistency. Hope springs eternal.
The antidote to an allegedly political prosecution is to limit the ability of prosecutors to take novel and politicized readings of relevant statutes. The goal is to reduce their power so they can't do this to anyone, but Trump and his supporters just don't want it happening to them.
"Time for Red State AGs and DAs to get busy," posted U.S. Rep. Mike Collins (R–Ga.) on X, per an ABC News report. It pointed to other Trump supporters, including conservative commentator Charlie Kirk who called on Republicans to "indict the left" and Donald Trump Jr., who called on Republicans to "fight fire with fire." It's almost as if they only care about justice when they are on the receiving end of it.
A recent Reason column lamented the dissipation of justice reform in some Red States: "Claiming to be responding to rising crime and the excesses of progressive reformers, several Republican-controlled state legislatures have not only reversed progress but also rolled back key reforms: increasing prison sentences, limiting parole and probation, restricting charities that pay bail for offenders, curtailing the discretion of local district attorneys and gutting civilian police oversight boards."
So, granted, there's no evidence whatsoever that Trump and MAGA want to reform the justice system and consistently address their concerns about the Trump prosecution. They seek revenge following the travails of their Dear Leader. But there's always time to learn the right lessons. When they do, I'll be the first one to welcome them into the criminal justice reform fold.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Given that "criminal justice reform" has come to mean "Do not incarcerate anybody except those in disfavor by the elites" --- fuck that.
Tried that. It does not work.
We need to increase malicious prosecution laws in states to cover residents being charged out of state.
I've got a nice simple fix: Get rid of all government prosecutors.
That's it. Keep government laws, courts, police, all that trash. But only allow victims or their guardians / heirs to prosecute.
For an additional fix, loser pays. All costs associated with the crime and trial, including travel expenses, investigators, lost wages, everything.
Don't let those motherfuckers define words for you. There are lots of ways criminals justice could be reformed, some bad, some good.
Tons of ways it CAN be done.
The way it IS done, though, has been a fiasco.
I do not trust them to do better in the future.
Well, the way it HAS BEEN done in recent years is. Mostly. Yes, we shouldn't just go along with whatever people are calling "criminal justice reform". But neither should we dismiss the concept because some people have been doing dumb shit.
Yep.
I agree that your wealth should not determine if you stay in pre-trial detention. But liberals went too far. I agree that if you are released and then commit another crime, then your cashless bail is revoked and you are no longer eligible for cashless bail. If you physically assault someone, you would not be eligible.
Something that separates me from the left is I still support the victim.
Criminal justice should also mean locking up violent repeat offenders ie: rapists, murderers, violent thugs, car jackers, (oops...car jackers should be executed immediately upon capture), child molesters, pedophiles and other un sociable trash.
Street gangs need to get the same treatment as Melei in El Salvadore has done by imprisoning 200,000 cartel gang bangers and .
We need to do the same here. Build a massive prison for the gangs.
Bukele in El Salvador.
Yes. People whine about "over-incarceration", but we are UNDER-incarcerating. We have hundreds of thousands of career thugs who should be in prison but aren't.
Do you know who else incarcerated the unfavored?
Sheriff Rosco P. Coaltrane?
Lenin , Trotsky, Stalin, Mao , Castro, Justin Trudeau,....
Pol Pott took the easy way and murdered his political enemies, not that the democrats wouldn't do the same if they could get away with it.
Pretty much every government in the world?
Also, shouldn't progressives and Reason Libertarians who are gung-ho for criminal justice reform be outraged over Trump's prosecution?
Because neither group really is.
They're too busy whining about Hunter Biden's gun charges. The difference is that Biden committed an actual crime.
I don't agree with the law that Biden was charged under, but, it is an ACTUAL law.
And it is an actual law the Left was in full favor of for its chilling effect on gun ownership until it was used against a scion of one of their elites.
And its going to be hilarious watching the appeals. Apparently Hunter's legal team is going to try to attack the constitutionality of the 4473 - and its going to be a mindfuck if the crack-addict son of the worst president in my lifetime (and lord knows there is some serious competition for that title - Nixon on) is able to get the 4473 struck down and actually end up increasing freedom in the country.
I hope Hunter takes it to SCOTUS and wins.
He will be pardoned well before the appeal is actually ever in a court.
Probably
He’ll be pardoned immediately after the election.
Ditto. I'd be thrilled if Hunter got some gun control laws overturned.
Plenty of prosecutors charged young, poor black men from the ghetto with what Hunter Biden was convicted of.
""prosecutors charged young, poor black men from the ghetto""
Isn't that why gun control was introduced in the first place? To do that.
Like the ones in Chicago who just happened to be holding a gun when it went off and killed a rival gang member or an innocent child.
Chicago year to date
Shot and killed: 204
Shot and wounded:991
Total shot: 1195
Total homicides: 237
Stats courtesy Hey Jackass/ Illustrating Chicago Values
Which is a good reason why other young black men in the ghetto who aren't involved in organized crime might also want to be armed.
I'm strongly in favor of gang members getting shot.
or an innocent child.
They need better training.
A number of programs to put gun-toting criminals in federal prison for a long time were successful, but discontinued because almost everyone they locked up was the wrong skin color.
wikipedia:
Project Exile is a federal program started in Richmond, Virginia, in 1997. Project Exile shifted the prosecution of illegal technical gun possession offenses to federal court, where they carried a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in federal prison under the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, rather than in state court. Note that federal law (18 U.S. Code § 922(g) & 924) provides for a penalty of ten years in federal prison for being a “prohibited person”, i.e., a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, as well as for falsifying information in order to obtain one, or furnishing a gun to a convicted felon.
The program has since been copied by several other cities, sometimes under other names. In Atlanta, for example, the program was known as FACE 5 (Firearms in Atlanta Can Equal 5 years in federal prison). While many have discontinued or modified their programs, Project Exile is still in effect in Rochester, New York.
Project Exile was opposed by some gun-rights groups and some black leaders, the latter saying that it disproportionately affected African Americans.
Hunter Biden was convicted of violating a law that others have been sent to prison for violating. Whether that law is constitutional is a debated question. I don't think it is, but that's just me.
Donald Trump was convicted of violating a frankenlaw charge uniquely crafted to be a weapon against him, with a mad prosecutor and judge screaming to the jury "He's guilty Igor! He's guilty!"
Those halcyon days of when Trump was on the senate floor grandstanding about the draconian punishments for possessing small amounts of certain drugs.
Donald Trump tough on crime. Reminds me of the time when Trump led the senate foreign relations committee in calling for the invasion of Iraq.
What about the time that Putin felt so emboldened by having his friend Trump in the White House that he invaded the Ukraine?
Or what about the time then President Obama sent a chewish woman, Victoria Nudelman to Ukraine to help stir up the Maiden, which led to the take over by neo-nazis, which then led to the murder of more than 12,000 ethnic Russians in the Donbass.
The Republicans should embrace Criminal Justice Reform. To be fair (even though I despise him), Donald Trump did address it somewhat when he was president. Of course he could have done much more. Conversely, the Biden Regime is lead by one of the worse examples and excuse of a human who authored or promoted some of the most egregious laws in the history of the country. Couple this with a terrible VP who has a horrific record.
Donald Trump was defined as a target and the Biden Regime has worked backwards to devise a crime that can be charged. They have twisted and contorted laws and abused common sense to such a degree that it is blatantly obvious this is politically motivated.
I hate being forced to defend Donald Trump, but while I despise him and would never vote for him, I find the Biden Regime much more dangerous to my personal liberties and the country. The Biden Regime more directly embodies what the left accuses Donald Trump of than Donald Trump does.
It almost to the point that whatever the left accused Trump of, the left is guilty of already.
So you say all that and still won't vote for Trump? Even if it's a vote against the Biden Crime Family?
I honestly can't understand people like you.
I can understand him. I live in California. Doesn't matter who I vote for, the Dem will get the electoral college votes. This election will be the first I can remember voting for any mainstream candidate, and it will be Trump just to boost his tally. I used to vote LP regardless, even Johnson+Weld, just to help them get ballot access. Not this time.
Even someone who lives in a swing state has very little chance of being an important vote.
Disagree there too. Then even if he wins, we will hear that he really didn't win & we need to abolish the EC. Every vote is important in this one. A statement needs to be sent.
Yes, that's why I said I will vote for Trump. But it's also why I said I understand not voting for Trump when it makes no difference in who gets elected. It sends its own message -- if the GOP wants more votes, pick better candidates.
Yeah. But Uomo isn't. He was the one I was originally talking to.
>>To be fair (even though I despise him)
tough work dealing with that ^^, Sisyphus ...
You are correct. The Biden administration is one of the most dangerous administrations to ever take power. It is filled with Obama hold overs and Clintonites all of them Marxists.
America could not withstand another four more years of Obama calling the shots. There won't be anything remaining.
Fuck you, Greenhat.
There is no “reform” on earth that would stop what they are doing as it is already criminal, illegal and constitution smashing and you know it! The Merrick Garland and Alvin Bragg clown shows are already stopped by a myriad of rules and regulations and they don’t give a fuck. They are lawless.
This is like saying Stalin could never have held a show trial if only the Soviet Union had fixed it’s laws around the courts.
This article is so stupid and fatuous.
"This article is so stupid and fatuous."
I can't remember the last time they had an article that wasn't stupid & fatuous.
"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." Joe Stalin
Three felonies A Day/ Harvey Silverglate...read that book and take heed.
"Show me the man - and I will convict him without even having to show you the crime."
Beria was a piker.
“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”
Just another article blaming the GOP for X.
Exactly.
The title should read:
"You know those ideas that are correct on leftist signs at riots that are, strangely, accurate in terms of justice/philosophy but no leftist actually believes in and more often than not will just take a real politik position on said issues to lawfare their opponents into nothingness? Yeah... fuck those evil Republicans for actually wanting to do what the sign says. What assholes."
What reform other than not letting crooked leftists be involved with the courts would have impacted his case?
Fuck off you vile proggy cunt. How exactly would any reform stop a rigged political prosecution or two?
>”Republicans Upset by Trump’s Conviction Should Embrace Criminal Justice Reform
The MAGA movement has suddenly discovered the evils of politicized prosecutions, inequities in the justice system, and fear of police abuse.”
Let me see if I have this straight, Greenhut.
The answer to a prosecutor abusing process, acting unethically, colluding with a judge that empowers him – the answer to that is *stop arresting and prosecuting people accused of crimes*?
Because that’s what CJR is today. Look at every place that has implemented it – NY (the place where the Trump prosecution was dreamed up), Chicago, etc. All places where people accused of violent crimes run free. Because their DA’s are CJR advocates.
CJR, Greenhut, IS PRECISELY WHAT GOT US THE TRUMP TRIALS!
Not just Chitown but every other democrat run city with many being so bad, no one in their right mind should go anywhere near them.
Oakland, Ca. is so bad, contractors refuse to work on the streets, repairing pot holes for fear of the crime.
A) First Step Act
B) Reason should embrace not supporting political prosecutions.
^THIS +1000000000000000
"but Trump and his supporters just don't want it happening to them."
Oh; so Greenhut thinks Hillary Clinton was prosecuted or what?
Greenhut is a disingenuous shill for the InterNational Socialist Party.
But criminal justice reform really isn't, and never has been, about cases like this. This is a completely different fish. "Reform" doesn't begin to encompass it.
In other news, Hey ladies, if you don't like being raped, maybe pick better sexual partners.
""So, granted, there's no evidence whatsoever that Trump and MAGA want to reform the justice system""
The first step act isn't evidence of such?
What killed the consensus of CJR was when we learned that what the left meant by "reform" was not only refusing to prosecute criminals but also vigorously prosecuting victims who had the gall to defend themselves and their communities from those criminals.
Yeah, it's not like Trump is the only one: Ross Ulbricht, Julian Assange, Douglass Mackey, Daniel Penny. They will prosecute whomever they like if they consider it politically advantageous while at the same time touting "criminal justice reform." By that they mean not prosecuting people for whom it would be politically disadvantageous (eg, the guy Daniel Penny restrained and accidentally killed).
Everything is being done in service of power. Principles have left the building.
Oh there are principles behind it.
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
^THIS +10000000000
9) Indoctrinate Identity Politics – Divide the people by being sure a persons sex and color are more important factors than anything else but pump BS propaganda labeling it ending racism and sexism.
It’s all just a consequence of letting [WE] gangs use ‘Gov-Guns’ to STEAL and ENSLAVE those ‘icky’ people. (i.e. Unlimited Democracy)
It's Marx (perhaps Hegel more specifically)... society makes man makes society makes man...
And they believe they have "awakened" to the knowledge of being man in this cycle who can now purposefully control the next iteration of society so they can then, through that, create the next form of man... eventually making socialist man and bringing about the end of history.
The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all
capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production
in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling
class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of
despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of
bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear
economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the
movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old
social order,12 and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising
the mode of production.
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.13
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty
generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all
rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and
rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by
means of a national bank with State capital and an
exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and
transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production
owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of
waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in
accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of
industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Marxists Internet Archive
Chapter II: Proletarians and Communists
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing
industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between
town and country by a more equable distribution of the
populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools.
Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form.
Combination of education with industrial production,
&c, &c.
"Reforming" an environment like this would be like filling the potholes on the road to the concentration camp. Like putting safety instructions on the electric torture machine for John Galt. Like an easier-to-use query program for a database of federal spending entries. Like a price list for officials' bribes. Like an ombudsman's office for targets of drone strikes.
"Look at what she was wearing. She was asking for it."
I don't understand why this magazine can't muster a full-throated unapologetic condemnation of the abuses of the people currently in power. It's not like this is a Democratic or Progressive magazine.
Alvin Bragg is in favor of what you call "criminal justice reform" and yet he's the one (among others) who did this. For once you should take these people to task without a single "but Trump" to be heard.
Liberals were big on restoring the rights of felons. I guess they are going to put that off for a while.
Over 1,000 people were murdered in New York while Fat Alvin was going after Trump.
It’s not like this is a Democratic or Progressive magazine.
Uh...you must be new here.
""The Mueller report "shows Mr. Trump trying to wield the power of law enforcement to target a political rival, a step that no president since Richard M. Nixon is known to have taken,"""
Trying? You give credit for Trump trying but won't callout people who actually did?
Fascism is always descending upon Trump, but landing on Biden.
Leftard Self-Projection; It's really all the left has.
I remember Nixon's "White House enemies list" it was quite the satirical jab with bumper stickers stating" I made the White House Enemies list".
Halderman, Erlichman, Mitchel and Dean
It follows a pattern if you dig what I mean
And what are we left with now?
Bumper stickers that say "Free The Watergate 500"
Spy movies with the same name with casts of thousands....
"Watergate Blues/ Gil Scott-heron
As I've long said: If Trump was a fraction of the fascist some claim he is, they'd be too scared to call him a fascist.
Kangaroo courts are already illegal; didn't stop this group of TDS-addled assholes.
The MAGA movement has suddenly discovered the evils of politicized prosecutions, inequities in the justice system, and fear of police abuse.
Wait, when did “we’re jailing too many black people” morph into, “You see, we go after our political opposition and act like a banana republic!”
Trump’s conviction isn’t about reforming the rules, it’s about getting rid of corrupt prosecutors and judges breaking the rules. This was about a justice system not following its own rules. So I guess by reform, you mean get a bunch of people together and march on the Capitol?
Yeah I'm struck by the way Greenhut clumsily conflates two different issues. Political prosecutions cannot be fixed by lowering mandatory sentences or ending civil forfeiture. For instance Hilary Clinton committed documented federal crimes up to and including destroying evidence under subpoena. She walked away uncharged. Trump allegedly didn't return disputed presidential records and he's charged with multiple felonies. Exactly what statutes or policies can be reformed to prevent obvious lawfare on the part of the ruling executive? And Trump is supposed to apologise for saying "lock her up" even though he had the power to do so for four years but chose not to? If the issue is criminal justice reform I would point out , like many before me, that a golden bipartisan opportunity was pissed away by outfits like Reason when they openly supported the criminality of BLM and Antifa and campaigned for Soros prosecutors. Greenhut owns a lot more of this shit than Trump.
"It's hard to be taken seriously if ..."
Apparently American politicians do NOT find it difficult to get elected and re-elected while failing to apply their political and policy principles consistently. Just sayin' ...
There's a sharp difference between the conviction of Donald Trump and the conviction of Hunter Biden.
Elie Honig said that “no state prosecutor – in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere – has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything. None. Ever.”
Plenty of prosecutors charged young, poor black men from the ghetto with what Hunter Biden was convicted of.
Including the current Vice President.
"First consider how these powers might be wielded in the hands of your enemies."
Far from worrying about misuse of the laws and regulations they implement, they relish abuse at the hands of their enemies. If they were serious about policy and law, they might worry about such things; but since they gain power from escalating polarization and strife they are quite happy to throw their friends under the bus and cry "Foul!" as needed.
Meanwhile in GA.
“”The meeting between Judge Ural Glanville, Fulton County prosecutors, Copeland and Copeland’s attorney has become the catalyst of a tense situation in the case. Lawyers representing the six co-defendants standing trial in the YSL case have accused the judge and prosecutors from Willis’ office of witness tampering and coercion during the meeting that defense counsels were not made aware of.
And after attorney Brian Steel, who is representing rapper Young Thug in the trial, revealed what happened in the judge’s chambers, Glanville held Steel in contempt and sentenced him to 20 days behind bars on Monday.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/fani-willis-witness-says-her-office-told-him-he-could-lie-in-court/ar-BB1oaZUk?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=cfc466077486483d990aabf882132cf0&ei=57
Yeah another Fani RICO prosecution but this time her victim is a black rapper. Another insane shit show that can only be stopped by a competent judge. Sadly there isn't one present in the courtroom.
If I were a district attorney or a state’s attorney, I would prosecute Democrats for felonies, regardless of collateral damage, regardless of the evidence, regardless of the law, regardless of Brady v. Maryland, regardless of the United States Constitution.
If I were a cop investigating a crime, my reaction would depend on if the suspect is a Democrat or a Republican.
If a Republican, I would do my best to destroy any evidence showing guilt, by hook or by crook.
If a Democrat, I would do my best to destroy any evidence showing innocence, by hook or by crook.
We are at war.
The rules have changed.
I wish it were not that way, but it is.
The rules have changed.
Do you remember Maraxus?
Because I will never forget Maraxus.
https://www.quora.com/Is-Trump-correct-when-he-said-that-The-answer-is-you-have-no-choice-because-they-re-doing-it-to-us-in-response-to-an-interviewers-question-about-locking-up-his-enemies-Will-Americas-prisons-become-Trumps-Gulags-of/answer/Michael-Ejercito
***START QUOTE***
You’ve asserted that public officials must be held to a higher moral standard than the rest of humanity. First, I’d like to know why that is the case.
She did uphold the law. She was arrested, went to court, pled guilty to the charges (i.e. she accepted responsibility for her actions), and was punished accordingly. She could have pulled a Perry and attempted to use her position to get out of the DUI charge, but instead she had enough integrity to accept responsility for her actions.
See, when we elect a district attorney, we trust them to do one thing: prosecute crimes. So long as they prosecute crimes, and do that properly and well, they’re doing what we asked them to. They are doing the bare minimum of what we expect from them- correctly using the powers of their office to perform the assigned duty. Driving drunk may reflect poorly on the DA’s character and mean they should not have been elected… but it doesn’t mean they have failed to do the actual job the public trusted them to do. We didn’t elect this DA to be sober, we elected them to prosecute cases.
Seriously, she made a bad decision and followed it up by doing the right thing. What’s blowing my fucking mind is apparently we have shitheads on this board that are attempting to justify Rick “The Dick” Perry making a blatant attempt to shove a shill appointee into one of the few effective anti-corruption enforcement agencies in the state of Texas.
Plus, if you actually read my arguments (which I doubt), you would have to notice that IT DOES NOT MATTER whether Lehmberg has lots of integrity or no integrity. Perry is not being charged with “thinking Lehmberg has no integrity.” He is being charged with misusing the power of his office and threatening to misuse taxpayer money, in order to coerce an elected official into acting in a certain way.
It DOES NOT MATTER that you think Perry was justified in doing so because this particular elected official was dishonorable and inferior. It is not Perry’s place to hire or fire Lehmberg, and it is not his place to threaten to defund a law enforcement operation in an attempt to blackmail her into resigning against her will.
Your appeals to “common sense” do not impress me. Give me a good reason why a moral failing, which incidentally has nothing to do with investigating corruption, should automatically disqualify a person from holding office. You assert without cause that this is the case. Please provide evidence that Lehmberg’s DUI has harmed the PIU’s integrity in any way. If you can’t do this without repeating some version of your “DUIs are rly bad guys” silliness, then maybe you should just go away.
And as for The Hammer, that’s true. He did get his conviction overturned by the Texas Supreme Court, an elected body that consists almost entirely of conservative Republicans. They didn’t think DeLay actually did all that stuff, and Texas doesn’t really have much in the way of campaign finance laws anyway. It makes no matter, though. He was still a cancerous growth on Congress’ asscheek, begging for a public fall from grace. And when he got convicted the first time around, we as a nation are better off for it. Ronnie Earle did humanity a favor when he realized that DeLay broke campaign finance laws, and he did us an even greater one when he got DeLay convicted. Whether or not “justice” was actually served against him isn’t so important. The fact that he no longer holds office though? That’s very important.
Of course! And the people on the Travis Commissioner’s Court would have tossed Lehmberg out on her ass a long time ago. They’re not doing it because there are, frankly, more important things at stake. In a state like Texas where the GOP has historically run roughshod over the Dems, they cannot afford to lose powerful positions like this. Considering the number of cases coming out of the PIU, including, incidentally, a Perry-allied ex-official who channeled millions of dollars to some of his big contributors, the Travis DA’s office has more influence than just about any Democrat in the state. If Perry didn’t have the right to appoint her replacement, and he almost assuredly would have appointed a fairly right-wing replacement, I’m sure the Travis County Dems would like to tell Lehmberg to take a short walk off a long pier. Unhappily, there are more important considerations at hand.
***END QUOTE***
Back in 2014, this was an extremely fringe belief. There was no way Maraxus’s ideals could become mainstream.
Now it is clear that the Democratic Party adopted Maraxus’s ideals.
The Democratic Party is the party of Maraxus, now.
In the animated series Gargoyles, there is a character called Demona, whose schtick was vengeance against those who hurt her and her kind.
To deal with Maraxus, we must become the party of Demona!
For this is war.
Doing the unjust things they do sounds more like capitulation than war.
How so?
>>Republicans Upset by Trump's Conviction
nobody's "upset" by T's conviction bro it's a fucking joke & will be dealt with ... go outside, take a walk in the sun or something
Apples and oranges.
>>>When they do, I'll be the first one to welcome them into the criminal justice reform fold.
oh fucking lol this turned into a lay down your arms screed.
No, hope does not spring eternal. You say these events are leading some Republicans to be concerned about criminal justice reform. Very true. There's just one massive problem: how did these events come to be? A large number of Democrats stopped caring about criminal justice reform.
People respond to action, not words. Prosecuting the left in a similar fashion is the short term pain needed for long term change. Republicans have not always paid lip service to criminal justice reform, but they have always been more closely aligned on the issue than Democrats.
If given the opportunity to do anything they like, Democrats will increase the size of government. Republicans will decrease it. Never forget that when you start the "both sides" nonsense.
Trump's conviction in a Marxist run kangaroo court, prosecuted by Obongo's personal picks of Marxists Bragg, James and Willis. Oh, and Merchan as well.
Bathhouse Barry said he would radically alter America and he did. The real America no longer exists. The Democrats are changing it into a Marxist state filled with fear and loathing, where anyone can be convicted of any sort of crime at any time and sent to the gulags for "re-education" as one democrat politician stated.
"Criminal justice reform" isn't about justice or second chances. It's about telling people it's not their fault if they choose to become criminals and injure or steal from others. It's about noticing that certain favored demographics were over-represented in prison, and, rather than trying to understand or improve the underlying conditions for why that happened, just giving them a free pass to continue to be criminals.
The whole point is to make objective laws and their enforcement into subjective rules for the oppressors running the government. Since rich white men were presumed to benefit from the previously more objective justice system, "criminal justice reform" would cut them no slack, and instead seek to over-prosecute and over-penalize for the sake of "equity."
Stop letting them define all the words!
I hope more people on the right do embrace real criminal justice reform because the left (both the voters and their politicians) have abandoned it.
The MAGA movement has suddenly discovered the evils of politicized prosecutions, inequities in the justice system, and fear of police abuse.
You failed to provide any evidence that your premise is true.
Pretty clear you missed the primary reason why they're upset about his conviction.
1. Take a respected custom, reasonable policy, or desirable reform
2. Poison it
3. Weaponize it
4. Wave its stiffened carcass in the air as a banner, while demanding compliance