The National Debt Is Making Us Poorer
The average American will lose between $5,000 and $14,000 annually by 2054 due to the burden of the growing national debt.

Many Americans are unhappy about years of higher-than-normal inflation that have sapped buying power and reduced standards of living.
Now, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) demonstrates that a difficult culprit will make you feel poorer over the next few decades: The nearly $35 trillion (and growing) national debt.
At its current trajectory, the rising national debt—and the increasing burden of making interest payments on it—will reduce Americans' future income growth by 12 percent over the next 30 years, the CBO projects in a new report. That means the average person will earn about $5,000 less annually than they would in a scenario where the debt was not growing.
"This is the result of crowding out, whereby a higher national debt reduces private investment and slows income growth," explain the number crunchers at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), a nonprofit that advocates for reducing the federal deficit. "With additional debt, income growth would slow further."
If the national debt grows faster than the CBO currently expects—something that could happen due to wars, pandemics, or simply because lawmakers in Washington can't cure their addiction to borrowing—the average person could miss out on $14,000 annually in future income gains that won't materialize, the CRFB predicts.
That crowding-out effect is a serious threat to future economic growth. There are a finite number of dollars in the economy in any given year, and each dollar that has to be taxed away to make an interest payment on the debt is a dollar that cannot be invested, spent, or paid to an employee.
The costs of rising debt can be a bit difficult to understand because we don't see reductions in potential earnings as obviously as we see price increases at the grocery store. Still, the effect is pretty similar. Americans' experience with inflation in recent years is helpful in understanding how the cost of the national debt depresses living standards.
In the CBO's baseline model, average earnings are expected to climb from about $84,000 this year to $123,000 in 2054, 30 years from now. That sounds great, except for the fact that average earnings would have climbed to about $128,000 by 2054 in a scenario where the national debt was stable and not growing.
To someone living in 2054, that $5,000 won't feel real because it never existed. But it would have existed, if not for the poor decisions by federal officials in the 2010s and 2020s.
Or think about it like this. If a politician in 2054 proposed a tax increase that drained $5,000 from the average earner's paycheck, he or she should expect a loud, negative backlash. But by hiking the national debt to its current levels—and by having no plan to stabilize or reduce the debt over the long term—politicians today are doing exactly that to Americans living 30 years from now. This is a hidden tax increase on the future.
It's a bit like how wages have increased dramatically in recent years, but people feel worse off because inflation has undermined (or canceled out) those increases. Anyone who has lived through the early 2020s knows that the amount of money you earn can increase even as your standard of living decreases—and the national debt will create a similar dynamic over the next few decades.
Any estimates like this should be taken with a grain of salt since the future is inevitably unpredictable, but the economic fundamentals underpinning the CBO's projections should be taken seriously. The national debt will soon eclipse $35 trillion, and the days of pretending that endless borrowing has no consequences are behind us.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So keep voting for the subhuman progressives.
It's reluctantly and strategically making us poorer.
A decision to do so again will be made in November, also reluctantly and strategically.
The United States is a late stage welfare empire. The average American is a net tax consumer and not producer. The only way to sustain this has been to increase the money supply with the consequence of escalating price increases. Biden issued sanctions have boomeranged, creating cracks in the dollar being the reserve currency and the petrodollar. A sudden, massive collapse is at least possible.
Yeap. And we get almost nothing here about the costs of welfare as they advocate bringing in more immigrants who utilize even more welfare.
But it’s a jobs program for private security firms. Private profits, public charge
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/cost-to-provide-security-for-homeless-and-migrants-rises-from-400-000-to-3-million/ar-BB1mNq2V
Why do they need millions in security? Are there that many hateful racists that keep attacking them?
shakedowns from the coyote cartels looking for a percentage of the under the table paychecks or UBI that Denver hands out.
A sudden, massive collapse is
at least possibleprobable.I wonder how long before a certain prolifically posting pedophile chimes in to insist that this all Trump’s fault, and not really happening. Then something about ‘spitting tabacky’.
Don't forget the cheesy poofs.
The collapse is inevitable I think, but the sudden part I agree is only probable. In fact, I'd argue the collapse has begun.
I’ll just leave this here. Yellen, the most incompetent fed chair now the incompetent treasury secretary. Coined the term “Transitory”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/louisiana-sen-john-kennedy-accuses-janet-yellen-of-giving-economy-sugar-high-to-help-biden-win/ar-BB1nDMu7
Democrats really love useless, over educated morons.
They love bureaucrats and central planners.
I have an aunt who was an english professor in southern California before she retired. She is the epitome of an over educated useless person. She also reveres the democrat party, and everything they hold sacred. She even considers Joe Bidem to be ‘so smart’. Something she actually said when i was fixing a stupid thing she did to her computer, as she watched him on TV.
There is no reasoning with these people. Just shove them aside and take over. While there is still a constitutional republic left.
The Biden Administration -- incompetence all the way down.
Biden, Harris, Yellen, Buttigieg.... does he have any competent appointees?
Jared Bernstein makes all of them look like nuclear physicists.
I think KJP is kinda cute as she flounders around in the press room.
https://babylonbee.com/news/white-house-claims-your-inability-to-afford-groceries-is-misinformation
'The average American will lose between $5,000 and $14,000 annually by 2054 due to the burden of the growing national debt.'
By "average American" do you mean the idiots who actually pay taxes but don't have a big enough investment portfolio to net positive gains? Well, serves them right.
Just look at the current and future vision for our most progressive state, California. In that social justice paradise, the overlords live a privileged lifestyle in exchange for watching over the peasantry, who in turn never have to worry about supporting themselves.
The secret is to make yourself not poor.
You.. can be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes! You can be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes! You say.. “Steve.. how can I be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes?” First.. get a million dollars. Now.. you say, “Steve.. what do I say to the tax man when he comes to my door and says, ‘You.. have never paid taxes’?” Two simple words. Two simple words in the English language: “I forgot!”
Coming soon, “free” high-speed rail to deliver looters to the shopping district.
"Coming soon, “free” high-speed rail"
Sooner, war with Russia and China. The easiest way to cancel the debt. The US is already attacking Russia with high tech weaponry. It will be a lot more consequential than the $5,000 you expected to have in 2054 but didn't actually get.
China has been dumping its US T bonds and buying gold. India is recalling its foreign gold reserves. The non-golden billions learned from Biden sanctions not to keep western assets. They are adjusting.
A war with China means Chinese goods stop being imported, which could cripple the economy. Unskilled people sitting at home collecting a check won’t suddenly show up at factories for $9/hour and magically develop a work ethic.
The high tech “smart” artillery shells delivered to Kiev are being jammed by Russians. The F35? It has been crashing itself. It just needs that many billions of dollars software upgrade and all will be fine. I’m sure. Houthis keep downing Reaper drones. China and Russia likely can fare even better. The US doesn’t seem to have a foil to hypersonic, carrier sinking missiles that Russia and likely China have. A direct war with both creates many fronts against a nation that lost to the Taliban. It also may bring North Korea into the mix rolling into South Korea. Biden really could lose Taiwan, South Korea, western Europe all in one conflict. Petrodollar and reserve currency could be dragged down that drain.
The US is cosplaying the Austro Hungarian empire. A July Ultimatum type event would continue on that path.
This is ignoring that nuclear nations have never faced off directly with consequences of that never tested.
We seem to be on the path to war against Russia and China. We've been attacking Russia for some time now, and retaliation is all but certain. Who do you think paid for all those tents that American students pitched on campuses? Who is organizing the mass protests? Who is arming and encouraging groups like the Party of God in Lebanon?
"Biden really could lose Taiwan, South Korea, western Europe all in one conflict. "
I doubt that would happen under Biden's watch. He's got less than a year to go. It might though, given the war time boost presidential candidates can expect. Expect no better under Trump. He styles himself as non-interventionist when addressing the rubes, but in front of an audience with money to spend, it's a different story.
"Donald Trump suggested during a fundraising event that he would have bombed Moscow in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and attacked Beijing if China invaded Taiwan on his watch, according to a Washington Post report. "
I thought Biden might have an opportunity to lessen tensions. Iranian elections are scheduled for the end of the month, and sealing a peace deal in Israel could perhaps sway Iran's public to a more US friendly 'moderate' candidate. It's not clear if Biden has any desire to pursue this opening.
Trump is like a woman - pay more attention to the actions than the vocalizations. Should it be that way? No, but it has been. No Crimea. No Maidan. No Chechnya. No Georgia. He was potus for 4 years which provided a track record of what could follow - no escalation and finalized the end of the Afghanistan debacle that Biden championed, voted for, and helped manage for 8 years as VP. What is the payoff for losing wars with Russia and China? For the average American. I get that the policy hacks and the MIC act like accountants in a company that want the accounting department to be 100% of the payroll. But there’s no upside for the rest and perhaps not even them ruling over a nuclear wasteland.
The 2020 domestic protests were organized by allies of Team Biden. I don’t have the “it was the joos” 2024 scorecard. I get that the planet is mostly siding with the Palestinians. But there certainly could he formal, clandestine backing.
Iran likely won’t warm to the US until it gets out of the ME as a political player. Then a generation to pass afterwards. They still remember the US backed Shah.
"He was potus for 4 years which provided a track record of what could follow – no escalation and finalized the end of the Afghanistan debacle that Biden championed, voted for, and helped manage for 8 years as VP."
I don't share your rosy view of Trump. He didn't pull out of Afghanistan, Syria or Iraq. Plus his shameful meddling in Yemen. His idea to bring stability to the Middle East by negotiating over the heads of the Palestinians has shown itself to be the catastrophe I suspected all along, and even modest advances were squandered by lack of follow through, as in North Korea. I don't expect much different at all from Trump. Maybe a face to face meeting with deferential and battle scarred Hamas leaders could turn his head, given his susceptibility to personal chemistry. It's a very slim reed, though.
"The 2020 domestic protests were organized by allies of Team Biden."
This is 2024 and the domestic protests are anti-Biden. Russia and China have a great interest in fomenting them. It's a good idea for them to keep the nation occupied with internal squabbles and the leaders worried about their personal careers.
"What is the payoff for losing wars with Russia and China? For the average American. "
I don't think the American planners of the next war can conceive of losing the war. That would require sober, level headed reflection. And the average American doesn't mean shit to them. Just someone to be duped into cheering along the MIC and the war mongers. Just look at how they've conned the supposedly libertarian audience here into urging on the genocide in Gaza.
"Iran likely won’t warm to the US until it gets out of the ME as a political player. "
We'll see what happens. I still think an opportunity exists, and it's up to the US to see if it can be exploited. A couple months back, the CIA chief, whom I've heard multiple and various sources claim to be the administration's canniest and most capable diplomat, was in Doha discussing and approving Iran's retaliation to the attack on the embassy in Syria. So in some sense, warmer relations have already been started.
Trump negotiated the exit from Afghanistan that one of the biggest supporters of the campaign extended so he could get a 9/11 photo op. The Taliban had other ideas. There was some military free-styling in Syria iirc. Trumps non-intervention record was worlds better than Biden, Obama, or W Bush. He also didn’t starve half a million like Albright-Clinton. Gulf War 1.0 was possibly avoidable by not giving Saddam a free hand so Bush 1 lower in the rankings too. Grenada and Lebanon were minor for Reagan; folks can argue about stuff in Latin America as well as continuing the Carter-Brzizinski doctrine in Afghanistan. Ronnie arguably the underdog in that debate. Carter had the failed Iran rescue mission as well as his Afghanistan meddling so he’s out. Maybe Ford is a contender.
Moscow and Washington had continuous direct discussions following the Cuban missile crisis. Well, up until Biden. There are still behind-the-scenes feelers. Not a surprise backroom talks occur with Iran. Crap, recently had a friend in Moscow check with the FSB on a passport. People talk. Regardless, the Iranian on the street will take a generation of non-meddling to warm to the US.
Chumby strongly supports not sending any foreign aid anywhere ever. Let the locals figure out their issues. If citizens want to GoFundTheME, they should have a free hand to do so. Leave the government and coerced taxpayer out of it.
"The Taliban had other ideas. "
They kept to the agreement with the US. Taliban militants stood shoulder to shoulder providing security at the airport as it suffered the terror attack. Not a Taliban attack but an ISIS attack. Obama, Trump or Biden made no such arrangements with ISIS (or the Afghan government.)
Maybe 100,000 starved to death in Yemen under Trump's watch while Trump encouraged it. It's a shameful record and totally Trump's responsibility. Congress attempted to alleviate the situation, and Trump vetoed. We see the consequences today as Yemen militia's stymie the navy's efforts to clear the seaways. I agree that Trump may be better than others, but that's damning with faint praise and I don't trust him.
I thought the relations with Russia took a significant turn for the worse under Clinton (expanding NATO) and Bush II (pulling out of various treaties.)
it was reported that the mastermind behind the airport attack was one of the +/- 500 prisoners previously held at Bagram. Biden abandoned the base and the prison at midnight on July 4. Didn’t tell the local Karzai folks nor the allies. The prisoners vanished into the population. Macron and Merkel later skewered the guy that gropes kids in the press. The UK parliament condemned him.
The video I saw showed US military providing security at the airport. There is an investigation whether the US fired into the crowd. Think it might be CNN doing the look; maybe a stopped clock situation. Either way, botcher Joe should have had all personnel out of there by the original deadline and not the unilateral extension he later imposed. Even as it was developing, he was taking a nap at Camp David.
Bush could talk with Putin. Clinton expanding NAFO after the commitment to never go east of the DDR was bad. They asked to join after the fall of the CCCP and Clinton gave them the Heisman. Biden backing the nazi-adjacent banderas in Kiev including supporting them pulling out of Minsk, providing material that has been targeting civilians plus at least ignoring the acts of terrorism if not blessing, encouraging, or participating in them far worse. All at the net positive taxpayer expense, more borrowing and printing, and inching towards globohomo nuclear war.
"Biden backing the nazi-adjacent banderas in Kiev including supporting them pulling out of Minsk, "
It's not just Biden, it's practically the entire US congress. And sending them billions of dollars. Not to mention the same bunch, Trump included, backing the genocide in Gaza with even more enthusiasm. Trump has even told financial backers, the backers who matter most, that he would bomb Moscow and Beijing in order to protect Ukraine and Taiwan.
"Didn’t tell the local Karzai folks nor the allies. The prisoners vanished into the population."
They are a side show. The question is, did they tell the Taliban? The withdrawal agreement was with the Taliban, not ISIS, not the Afghan government, not the allies.
"Either way, botcher Joe should have had all personnel out of there by the original deadline and not the unilateral extension he later imposed."
In an ideal world, Trump should have withdrawn the troops, just as he promised. I suspect he didn't because he wanted to be re-elected and knew that any withdrawal would have inevitable, unavoidable hitches like the airport bombing, (sorry, that's the price of being on the losing side or a war,) he would be blamed and his re-election chances would be lessened. Kudos to Biden for having the stones to withdraw them. The notion that ISIS, enraged over a delay in the US withdrawal, decided to perpetrate a terror attack on the US, is silly.
And by "soon" you mean maybe sometime in the next 60 years, based on progress so far.
And by "free" you mean another 300 billion over budget or so.
You know, I always wondered about the trains in Atlas Shrugged. I figured it was due to having been written in the 50's when maybe trains were still a part of everyday travel for more people.
These days, though, I realize trains are simply the fascination of central planners and a way to control travel. If you can only go where the trains take you, well, that's it then.
Those idiots that can barely afford groceries and live paycheck. How dare they not invest!
Not everyone is lucky to have an investment portfolio. I do agree a lot of idiots don't even put matching into their 401k
It will only make us poorer if we choose to remain enslaved to the previous generations debts. That is merely a choice and a poor one at that.
The other option is the most ancient one of all. Jubilee. Which was precisely the way of freeing the living generation from the debt of a dead/dying generation. Where govt debt was precisely the debt to be written. It dates back to the very first legal code - the Sumerian Urukagina. Where the Sumerian word for freedom - ama-gi (the Sumerian characters crash the post) - is first etched into clay. Where it was so successful that the Hebrews adopted the idea and put it into their bible as a commandment from God (vs the original Sumerian idea which was a decision of a new govt).
unfortunately we have another written law -- section 4 of the 14th Amendment:
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Indeed. So Thomas Jefferson was wrong - I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self evident, ‘that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living’ that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it.
The dead will soon control the US and the living will merely be the servants of the dead.
All the government needed to do was stop spending--yet they don't. Just forgiving the debt isn't gonna do squat.
And just so you know, Semites like the Hebrews predated Sumer--if anything, Sumer took jubilee from them, not the other way around.
No they didn't. The Sumerian law codes that describe the Jubilee (debt forgiveness or tabula rasa) equivalent still exist today in the form of stone tablets. Dating back to pre-Abraham not post-Leviticus. They were carved in stone or on clay - and stuck in a public place so everyone could see the announcement. Debt forgiveness has to be very public when one of the consequences is emancipation from debt slavery.
Not a detailed commandment from a Levitical God that is then completely ignored in its implementation from then on. Even the Talmud (written long after the Bible) only has two very indirect mentions of a possible Jubilee implementation - both of which occur around the Babylonian exile. 500 BCE not 2400 BCE. When it couldn't have actually occurred since the 10 lost tribes were lost by then.
Oh - and forgiving the debt is precisely what stops the spending. Because it forces govt to work on a time-labor system not a cash-debt system - for awhile at least. Similar to nightwatchman or militia system. If something is important, people will contribute their time to making it happen and those who contribute their time will be the ones who decide what needs doing.
And what made the national debt?
ILLEGAL (UN-Constitutional) [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] by an 87% margin.
…only 13% was Constitutional.
A small price to pay for equity, amiright?
Small for some, huge for others. That's how we equity.
The debt directly contributes to inflation as well, by allowing massive spending on things no one would buy with their own money.
All debt does that not just govt debt. How much would house prices drop if mortgage debt didn't have all the subsidies that govt provides either its borrowers or issuers? Much of which are the consequence of HAVING a large base of 'risk-free collateral' (read govt debt) at the base of that mortgage debt pyramid. Housing is much of what drives inflation.
Look at you. Still ignorant to the fact SALT was capped and most dont itemize their mortgage interest anymore. But still using that talking point.
Private debt is taken out by the people who have to pay it back, to buy things they want (before they can afford them). It drives prices up somewhat of course.
“Public” debt is taken out by people who don’t have to pay it back, in exchange for political support from the people the debt benefits, to buy things that apparently no one wants to buy if they have to pay for it themselves.
Private debt is taken out by the people who have to pay it back
Until they get bailed out and the terms of debt repayment is transferred to the public. See 2008 (as merely one of dozens of examples in the lat couple decades).
That doesn't take anything away from his point.
Let's see house prices are location, cost to build, and cost of workers. Yeah all those govt subsiders that cause the prices to skyrocket.
You left out how much cheaper a mortagage would be without property taxes and insurance. You do realize the govt realizes the value of a home every year so they can collect on that sweet sweet dollars.
Ugh, I unmuted you for your dumb take.