The Viral Story About a Defendant Driving With a Suspended License Was Fake News
Corey Harris' case should never have been a national news story to begin with.

A Michigan man swept the internet last week after a viral video showed him attending a court hearing via Zoom after he appeared to park his car. That quickly became a national story.
Should it have been?
The footage, which first made the rounds on social media, showed Corey Harris calling into a hearing before Judge J. Cedric Simpson of the Washtenaw County District Court. "I'm looking at his record. He doesn't have a license," Simpson says about a minute into the hearing. "He's suspended and he's just driving….I don't even know why he would do that." Harris' bond was promptly revoked and he was ordered to turn himself in to the local jail.
Neither of those repercussions would have anywhere near the lasting impact that the forthcoming news cycle did, which was deemed a significant enough event to merit coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, NBC, BBC, USA Today, and the New York Post, among other outlets.
It turns out all those stories, however, were based on a falsehood. Harris never had a license.*
That's a good indication that this never should have been a national story to begin with, which would be true even if Harris had been driving on a suspended license. A man in Michigan driving allegedly when he wasn't supposed to is not newsworthy enough to deserve coverage in the most influential outlets in the U.S. (and beyond). Good for a social media laugh? Sure. Justifying its own news cycle? No.
That idea may seem weird in a media landscape where social media virality has for several years been seen as a metric for measuring newsworthiness. What that means in practice, though, is that some of the largest publications in the world—across the political spectrum—routinely blow up small stories that are of no import to society, simply because they may be good for clicks and shares. But while those stories may offer little to no benefit to readers, they do have real impacts on the people at the center of them, like Harris, because the internet never dies.
"Twitter isn't real life" has been a cliche for years now. The name of the platform has changed, but the core of that maxim has not. Harris knows that all too well now.
*CORRECTION: The original version of the piece mischaracterized the status of Harris' driver's license. For an update on this story, see "Viral Story About Bogus Viral Story Was Also Bogus."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's really simple.
If multiple named, reliable, verifiable sources are not cited, it is not a news story.
It is an opinion piece by a biased propagandist.
And no social media outlet is a reliable source.
What if you cited coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, NBC, BBC, USA Today, and the New York Post?
Oh, those are not reliable sources.
Most pro-Trump stories have no named reliable verifiable sources because they are full of falsehoods. They are written by biased propagandists. It really is that simple.
Lol. Wow, you’re a bitter little guy, chuckie.
I bet you’re fun at parties.
In a year, he's going to be laughing at it himself.
As for news media digging into court records -- in what planet would anyone even think of that? Not only do most people (wrongly) think government is competent at least in such mundane bureaucratic tasks, the report was the same as kittens rescued from trees or a cop halting traffic to let a mama duck and ducklings waddle across a road.
What's stupid is berating mainstream media for pushing such a story. A tempest over a tempest in a teacup.
Not really. It's just one more reason why people are leaving the MSM and going elsewhere for news and information.
At least he did not stand out in public and have some Native American dude beating a drum in his face for no reason.
THAT is what a national story looks like!
The maga hat was clearly triggering. Have some compassion for the noble tribal elder!
The guy never said his license wasn't suspended.
Please share your inside source of information that proves "the guy" was permitted to speak at that point in the proceeding. TIA!!
At least vax info was never misreported.
Come on, it's not like masks are mere talismans!
Virtue signals.
This was not "fake" news, in that it actually happened. Now the reporters arguably got the crux of the story wrong by not properly following up and finding out about the government's clerical error, which is modern day journalists being lazy. A man being arrested for driving without a license because the government made a record keeping mistake should be newsworthy.
There was no clerical error. The license MAY have been reinstated years ago, but it WAS under suspension at the time of the hearing.
If you believe the link in this article, the license SHOULD have been reinstated years ago, but NEVER WAS. That being the case, the defendant IS guilty of driving on a suspended license. There is ZERO excuse for not KNOWING he had not received the MANDATORY paperwork lifting the suspension.
If you read the linked article in Detroit, it explains how complicated it is to resolve these issues. Non profits have needed to sprout up to help people in his situation. Everyone who saw the video thought Harris was stupid and lazy. This should give them pause in the future, but most won’t know.
It was ordered to be reinstated and Harris thought it was. In Michigan, this is administered by the Secretary of State’s office and they require you to go in and request reinstatement. One could be forgiven for knowing that a court order lifting the suspension would not, you know, lift the suspension, and that a separate step of requesting its reinstatement was needed. When attorneys who deal with this in Michigan complain about how insane and impenetrable the system is (for them), I rather suspect mere mortals have a pretty good excuse for not knowing how to navigate and fix the issue.
But sure, capitalizing random words and engaging in categorical, overblown statements has convinced me that all that is wrong and it’s this guy’s fault entirely, not a broken and impenetrable system’s.
All hail government, provider of all that is good and wonderful and down with the individual, who should have known his rights exist only as license from the government.
So, in other words, what StevenF said was correct, you just don't like the way he said it because he used capital letters so attempt to ridicule him for it? Cool.
No, he was not correct at all. If a court says it's not suspended, it's not. It's a clerical matter that normally automatically happens. It didn't but that doesn't change his status - he had a valid license that was not suspended.
No he is not. A court ordered his license reinstated, so it was. It just wasn't updated on the Dept of State's side.
It literally is a clerical error.
What's even dumber, is that this "degenerate criminal zooms from behind the wheel on a suspended license" makes the reels 2-3 times a year.
Like 10 -15 years ago or so when we'd be treated to "Chinese man sues wife for ugly baby" a couple times a year.
Was that the woman who was impregnated by an ALIEN??
"Twitter isn't real life" has been a cliche for years now.
Still waiting for the links to Mastodon.
https://x.com/joinmastodon
people do that on a&e's Court Cam like every other episode
I must lead a charmed life, never heard of this “story” until now.
The MSM has a habit of inflammatory reporting. They had a great deal to with the George Fentanyl riots by inflaming the narrative and even lying.
So it's no surprise when the MSM decides to get involved with this one. I can't wait to hear what Whoopsie and her panel on the View have to say about this one. I would bet it would be a real winner.
Quit listening to it more than twenty five years ago.
The MSM is pure trash.
That bureaucratic inefficient government of lowest common denominator DEI hires at work.
"Oh, I forgot to check a box. My bad."
"Yea, of course you did someone we're paying you far more than you're worth because we're obligated to."
That's who you should be pissed at. The government employee who didn't do their retard-level basic job.
But while those stories may offer little to no benefit to readers, they do have real impacts on the people at the center of them, like Harris, because the internet never dies.
Who, at some point, had done something that warranted a suspension of his license. Let's not forget that. If decent people were decent people, this wouldn't have happened in the first place.
YES. I AM ABSOLUTELY ALLOCATING THIS GUY'S SHARE OF BLAME TO HIM.
Be better humans, avoid these kinds of things completely. It's not rocket science.
Let he who is without error cast the first stone:
You must be that man.
Not even close.
But that doesn't mean I'm wrong.
What do you have to do to get a suspended license in the first place? Whatever it is, DON'T DO THAT.
Why is that so difficult?
He got behind on child support, which he subsequently made up. Should that be a reason to suspend a license? What is the nexus to driving and how does suspending a license help get someone to pay up on child support?
Maybe don't get behind on your child support?
I mean, it's literally support for your children. Why would any parent ever get behind on that? If anything, suspending the license seems like kind of a light consequence for such a thing.
Maybe next time avoid all the clerical nonsense and just send him straight to jail.
Because child support is a joke and usually is way too much, plus life happens that sometimes people can't control.
When you lose your job because you cannot get to it, you've got an excuse for not paying child support - except it's likely the judge won't listen to it...
YES. I AM ABSOLUTELY ALLOCATING THIS GUY’S SHARE OF BLAME TO HIM.
What about, say, a guy who decides to cheat on his wife and sleep with a porn star. Hypothetically speaking, would that guy bear some share of blame even if that choice resulted in disproportionate consequences?
Is sleeping with a porn star illegal Jeff?
The punishment for sleeping with a porn star should just be crabs.
What about YOU?
Yes.
It was not newsworthy because he was driving on a suspended license, but because he made a video appearance in court while driving on a suspended license That is the sole thing that made it the type story which would attract attention.
The judge thought the guy was driving on a suspended license as he was reading the guy’s rap sheet. It was not unreasonable to rely on the judge rather than go to that jurisdiction and check the underlying records.
Also, it is fake news to call the video fake. It is the real video from the actual hearing where the judge relied on the rap sheet as judges do thousands of times a day.
Beside why should we believe you? You provided no proof like demand of others.
RickA, you are correct. The original story was just one of many non-critical storied that get in the news to add some flavor. That it was reported was not an error, not malicious, not "fake news". However, the stories we now see, like this one in Reason, ARE fake news in the sense that they use the innocuous and meaningless suspended license story as a springboard to make subtle digs at X and other social media. The storied bitching about "the story" have their own level of "fake" about them, not fake as related to facts, but fact as related to why they are written and the way they are written. As always, NONE of it is "news", it's ALL narrative.
"It was not unreasonable to rely on the judge rather than go to that jurisdiction and check the underlying records."
What happened to "if your mother says she loves you, check it out?"
Now do climate change.
I want to see Billy boy talk about the Steele Dossier.
Wuhan flu?
The murdering fire extinguisher.
It is happening. Next story.
It has always been happening. No taxes nor restrictions needed.
According to an article linked by Reason, the guy's license had been suspended until 2022, when he got a court order requiring that the license be reinstated. For some reason the order was never carried out. He was pulled over (this year?) and charged with driving on a suspended license, and when he zoomed the court from a car he was arrested for violating conditions of pretrial release.
A clerical error you say? Sounds like 34 felonies for the clerk.
Won the webz today.
Trump could have beaten the rap by claiming that the falsified documents were indeed clerical errors. But he would have perjured himself under cross examination. Trump is such a sociopath that he can't avoid committing crimes!
You’re boring.
In November you’ll be boring and sad. Haha.
"only registering as suspended due to a clerical error"
This is a serious issue. I knew someone who was charged with driving using a suspended license -- the person whose license was actually suspended had the same name and a birthdate only a day or two apart. Maybe not national news media but we need to get our databases to be accurate.
All very well, except the licence was still suspended - albeit perhaps due to administrative issues - and what's more the perp _knew_ it was suspended, because he had been stopped, arrested, and charged, and that's why he was appearing before a judge. It's the unimaginable idiocy that is newsworthy, and the clerical error supposedly responsible for the licence still being suspended is uninteresting.
So, as usual, Reason lies to make up the story it wants to report instead of the one that actually happened. The irony...
No it was not. A court ordered it reinstated, to that instantly mean it was no longer suspended. Just because that was never reported to the Dept of State doesn't change the fact that wasn't suspended. Had he known sooner, he would've fixed it before he was stopped and arrested and charged. He didn't, and regardless now the he did, he was ready to prove it. But the judge didn't wait to listen.
Anybody who thinks he is in the wrong has never been on the side of the government screwing you over, and would be just as pissed at the situation.
So was that remote court hearing about the suspended license, or wasn't it? If it was, then being seen driving on the Zoom connection was extremely foolish, even if the suspension was a mistake. Perhaps to the point of being newsworthy.
Of course, suspending peoples' driver licenses for reasons that have nothing to do with their driving records is extremely foolish in itself, but all states must now do this, or risk losing lots of Federal aid. If there is a renewed push to change that now, then some good will have come out of this incident, but I don't expect it.
Just so you will know to stay away from Chicago and Illinois entirely, they passed a get out of jail free law:
https://cwbchicago.com/2024/06/fairness-and-equity-illinois-drivers-can-get-3-unpaid-tickets-a-year-before-license-suspension-under-newly-passed-law.html
When the media was savaging Sarah Palin, how many of you morons actually thought Tina Fay's line "I can see Russia from my front door" was what Palin said?
All anybody remembers anymore is the lie.
I knew a guy who faced a driving on a suspended license charge. He was eligible for reinstatement but had not gone through all the proper procedures. The judge dropped the charges after he went through the proper procedures (paid off the DMV). He was indisputably guilty and a sympathetic judge gave him a break because the system has real crimes to deal with. Another judge in another state could have found him guilty and suspended his license some more.
The perp in this case might have been given more of a break if he hadn’t appeared in front of the judge, on Zoom, on charges of driving with a suspended licence _while driving_. A criminal mastermind, he ain’t.
Really, it's not that hard. Wait a minute to answer the call, or pull over (and change seats), or let his passenger drive the last hundred yards. Or, say it's a RHD car and he's a passenger, and at least give the judge a chance to give him a break.
OR he did nothing wrong. Yes actually, that's the correct answer.
Wow, Reason jumps in the wayback machine to roughly 1998 and realizes that national stories get made out of clickbait. They do realize this kind of 'news' happened even before social media, right?
And funnily enough, the guys license actually was indeed suspended at the time, regardless of protestations about how complex the Michigan system is?
Would it be possible for the judge who ordered the license reinstated, back in 2022, to conduct an investigation to find out how his/her order was thwarted, and maybe even consider some punishment?
Steve Lehto explains why Billy is slightly incorrect in his take here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PBy9P5CuBs
Overall, I feel sorry for the guy, if he thought his license was unsuspended, but wasn't informed of the rest of the procedural steps he needed to take. And I have no idea why we are suspending people's DL's for 'failure to pay child support'. Seems like a counterproductive way to facilitate a situation where he *could* pay child support.
The story continues: the Judge says the person in the video never possessed a license in the first place.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/06/05/corey-harris-case-driving-suspended-license/