Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Media Criticism

The Viral Story About a Defendant Driving With a Suspended License Was Fake News

Corey Harris' case should never have been a national news story to begin with.

Billy Binion | 6.3.2024 4:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Judge Cedric Simpson (left) reacts during Corey Harris' (right) hearing | YouTube
Judge Cedric Simpson (left) reacts during Corey Harris' (right) hearing (YouTube)

A Michigan man swept the internet last week after a viral video showed him attending a court hearing via Zoom after he appeared to park his car. That quickly became a national story.

Should it have been?

The footage, which first made the rounds on social media, showed Corey Harris calling into a hearing before Judge J. Cedric Simpson of the Washtenaw County District Court. "I'm looking at his record. He doesn't have a license," Simpson says about a minute into the hearing. "He's suspended and he's just driving….I don't even know why he would do that." Harris' bond was promptly revoked and he was ordered to turn himself in to the local jail.

Neither of those repercussions would have anywhere near the lasting impact that the forthcoming news cycle did, which was deemed a significant enough event to merit coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, NBC, BBC, USA Today, and the New York Post, among other outlets. 

It turns out all those stories, however, were based on a falsehood. Harris never had a license.*

That's a good indication that this never should have been a national story to begin with, which would be true even if Harris had been driving on a suspended license. A man in Michigan driving allegedly when he wasn't supposed to is not newsworthy enough to deserve coverage in the most influential outlets in the U.S. (and beyond). Good for a social media laugh? Sure. Justifying its own news cycle? No.

That idea may seem weird in a media landscape where social media virality has for several years been seen as a metric for measuring newsworthiness. What that means in practice, though, is that some of the largest publications in the world—across the political spectrum—routinely blow up small stories that are of no import to society, simply because they may be good for clicks and shares. But while those stories may offer little to no benefit to readers, they do have real impacts on the people at the center of them, like Harris, because the internet never dies.

"Twitter isn't real life" has been a cliche for years now. The name of the platform has changed, but the core of that maxim has not. Harris knows that all too well now.

*CORRECTION: The original version of the piece mischaracterized the status of Harris' driver's license. For an update on this story, see "Viral Story About Bogus Viral Story Was Also Bogus."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Maryland Elementary School Tries To Force Students To Say The Pledge

Billy Binion is a reporter at Reason.

Media CriticismMediaSocial MediaTwitterMichiganCourtsDriving
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (67)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    It's really simple.
    If multiple named, reliable, verifiable sources are not cited, it is not a news story.
    It is an opinion piece by a biased propagandist.
    And no social media outlet is a reliable source.

    1. BigT   1 year ago

      What if you cited coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, NBC, BBC, USA Today, and the New York Post?

      Oh, those are not reliable sources.

    2. charliehall   1 year ago

      Most pro-Trump stories have no named reliable verifiable sources because they are full of falsehoods. They are written by biased propagandists. It really is that simple.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

        Lol. Wow, you’re a bitter little guy, chuckie.

        I bet you’re fun at parties.

  2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

    In a year, he's going to be laughing at it himself.

    As for news media digging into court records -- in what planet would anyone even think of that? Not only do most people (wrongly) think government is competent at least in such mundane bureaucratic tasks, the report was the same as kittens rescued from trees or a cop halting traffic to let a mama duck and ducklings waddle across a road.

    What's stupid is berating mainstream media for pushing such a story. A tempest over a tempest in a teacup.

    1. JohnZ   1 year ago

      Not really. It's just one more reason why people are leaving the MSM and going elsewhere for news and information.

      1. damikesc   1 year ago

        At least he did not stand out in public and have some Native American dude beating a drum in his face for no reason.

        THAT is what a national story looks like!

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

          The maga hat was clearly triggering. Have some compassion for the noble tribal elder!

  3. IceTrey   1 year ago

    The guy never said his license wasn't suspended.

    1. EdG   1 year ago

      Please share your inside source of information that proves "the guy" was permitted to speak at that point in the proceeding. TIA!!

  4. Chumby   1 year ago

    At least vax info was never misreported.

    1. Rick James   1 year ago

      Come on, it's not like masks are mere talismans!

      1. BigT   1 year ago

        Virtue signals.

  5. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

    This was not "fake" news, in that it actually happened. Now the reporters arguably got the crux of the story wrong by not properly following up and finding out about the government's clerical error, which is modern day journalists being lazy. A man being arrested for driving without a license because the government made a record keeping mistake should be newsworthy.

    1. StevenF   1 year ago

      There was no clerical error. The license MAY have been reinstated years ago, but it WAS under suspension at the time of the hearing.
      If you believe the link in this article, the license SHOULD have been reinstated years ago, but NEVER WAS. That being the case, the defendant IS guilty of driving on a suspended license. There is ZERO excuse for not KNOWING he had not received the MANDATORY paperwork lifting the suspension.

      1. gabrielkunkel   1 year ago

        If you read the linked article in Detroit, it explains how complicated it is to resolve these issues. Non profits have needed to sprout up to help people in his situation. Everyone who saw the video thought Harris was stupid and lazy. This should give them pause in the future, but most won’t know.

      2. Untermensch   1 year ago

        It was ordered to be reinstated and Harris thought it was. In Michigan, this is administered by the Secretary of State’s office and they require you to go in and request reinstatement. One could be forgiven for knowing that a court order lifting the suspension would not, you know, lift the suspension, and that a separate step of requesting its reinstatement was needed. When attorneys who deal with this in Michigan complain about how insane and impenetrable the system is (for them), I rather suspect mere mortals have a pretty good excuse for not knowing how to navigate and fix the issue.

        But sure, capitalizing random words and engaging in categorical, overblown statements has convinced me that all that is wrong and it’s this guy’s fault entirely, not a broken and impenetrable system’s.

        All hail government, provider of all that is good and wonderful and down with the individual, who should have known his rights exist only as license from the government.

        1. David Perry   1 year ago

          So, in other words, what StevenF said was correct, you just don't like the way he said it because he used capital letters so attempt to ridicule him for it? Cool.

          1. Patrick Henry, the 2nd   1 year ago

            No, he was not correct at all. If a court says it's not suspended, it's not. It's a clerical matter that normally automatically happens. It didn't but that doesn't change his status - he had a valid license that was not suspended.

      3. Patrick Henry, the 2nd   1 year ago

        No he is not. A court ordered his license reinstated, so it was. It just wasn't updated on the Dept of State's side.

        It literally is a clerical error.

  6. Pablo long cock   1 year ago

    What's even dumber, is that this "degenerate criminal zooms from behind the wheel on a suspended license" makes the reels 2-3 times a year.

    1. Pablo long cock   1 year ago

      Like 10 -15 years ago or so when we'd be treated to "Chinese man sues wife for ugly baby" a couple times a year.

      1. JohnZ   1 year ago

        Was that the woman who was impregnated by an ALIEN??

  7. Rick James   1 year ago

    "Twitter isn't real life" has been a cliche for years now.

    Still waiting for the links to Mastodon.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

      https://x.com/joinmastodon

  8. Dillinger   1 year ago

    people do that on a&e's Court Cam like every other episode

  9. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    I must lead a charmed life, never heard of this “story” until now.

  10. JohnZ   1 year ago

    The MSM has a habit of inflammatory reporting. They had a great deal to with the George Fentanyl riots by inflaming the narrative and even lying.
    So it's no surprise when the MSM decides to get involved with this one. I can't wait to hear what Whoopsie and her panel on the View have to say about this one. I would bet it would be a real winner.
    Quit listening to it more than twenty five years ago.
    The MSM is pure trash.

  11. AT   1 year ago

    That bureaucratic inefficient government of lowest common denominator DEI hires at work.

    "Oh, I forgot to check a box. My bad."
    "Yea, of course you did someone we're paying you far more than you're worth because we're obligated to."

    That's who you should be pissed at. The government employee who didn't do their retard-level basic job.

    But while those stories may offer little to no benefit to readers, they do have real impacts on the people at the center of them, like Harris, because the internet never dies.

    Who, at some point, had done something that warranted a suspension of his license. Let's not forget that. If decent people were decent people, this wouldn't have happened in the first place.

    YES. I AM ABSOLUTELY ALLOCATING THIS GUY'S SHARE OF BLAME TO HIM.

    Be better humans, avoid these kinds of things completely. It's not rocket science.

    1. BigT   1 year ago

      Let he who is without error cast the first stone:

      You must be that man.

      1. AT   1 year ago

        Not even close.

        But that doesn't mean I'm wrong.

        What do you have to do to get a suspended license in the first place? Whatever it is, DON'T DO THAT.

        Why is that so difficult?

        1. Untermensch   1 year ago

          He got behind on child support, which he subsequently made up. Should that be a reason to suspend a license? What is the nexus to driving and how does suspending a license help get someone to pay up on child support?

          1. AT   1 year ago

            Maybe don't get behind on your child support?

            I mean, it's literally support for your children. Why would any parent ever get behind on that? If anything, suspending the license seems like kind of a light consequence for such a thing.

            Maybe next time avoid all the clerical nonsense and just send him straight to jail.

            1. Patrick Henry, the 2nd   1 year ago

              Because child support is a joke and usually is way too much, plus life happens that sometimes people can't control.

          2. markm23   1 year ago

            When you lose your job because you cannot get to it, you've got an excuse for not paying child support - except it's likely the judge won't listen to it...

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      YES. I AM ABSOLUTELY ALLOCATING THIS GUY’S SHARE OF BLAME TO HIM.

      What about, say, a guy who decides to cheat on his wife and sleep with a porn star. Hypothetically speaking, would that guy bear some share of blame even if that choice resulted in disproportionate consequences?

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

        Is sleeping with a porn star illegal Jeff?

        1. Lester75   1 year ago

          The punishment for sleeping with a porn star should just be crabs.

      2. StevenF   1 year ago

        What about YOU?

      3. AT   1 year ago

        Yes.

  12. RickAbrams   1 year ago

    It was not newsworthy because he was driving on a suspended license, but because he made a video appearance in court while driving on a suspended license That is the sole thing that made it the type story which would attract attention.

    The judge thought the guy was driving on a suspended license as he was reading the guy’s rap sheet. It was not unreasonable to rely on the judge rather than go to that jurisdiction and check the underlying records.

    Also, it is fake news to call the video fake. It is the real video from the actual hearing where the judge relied on the rap sheet as judges do thousands of times a day.

    Beside why should we believe you? You provided no proof like demand of others.

    1. jimntempe   1 year ago

      RickA, you are correct. The original story was just one of many non-critical storied that get in the news to add some flavor. That it was reported was not an error, not malicious, not "fake news". However, the stories we now see, like this one in Reason, ARE fake news in the sense that they use the innocuous and meaningless suspended license story as a springboard to make subtle digs at X and other social media. The storied bitching about "the story" have their own level of "fake" about them, not fake as related to facts, but fact as related to why they are written and the way they are written. As always, NONE of it is "news", it's ALL narrative.

    2. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

      "It was not unreasonable to rely on the judge rather than go to that jurisdiction and check the underlying records."

      What happened to "if your mother says she loves you, check it out?"

  13. Chumby   1 year ago

    Now do climate change.

    1. VULGAR MADMAN   1 year ago

      I want to see Billy boy talk about the Steele Dossier.

      1. BigT   1 year ago

        Wuhan flu?

        1. Chumby   1 year ago

          The murdering fire extinguisher.

    2. charliehall   1 year ago

      It is happening. Next story.

      1. Chumby   1 year ago

        It has always been happening. No taxes nor restrictions needed.

  14. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

    According to an article linked by Reason, the guy's license had been suspended until 2022, when he got a court order requiring that the license be reinstated. For some reason the order was never carried out. He was pulled over (this year?) and charged with driving on a suspended license, and when he zoomed the court from a car he was arrested for violating conditions of pretrial release.

  15. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    A clerical error you say? Sounds like 34 felonies for the clerk.

    1. Grifhunter   1 year ago

      Won the webz today.

    2. charliehall   1 year ago

      Trump could have beaten the rap by claiming that the falsified documents were indeed clerical errors. But he would have perjured himself under cross examination. Trump is such a sociopath that he can't avoid committing crimes!

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

        You’re boring.

        In November you’ll be boring and sad. Haha.

  16. charliehall   1 year ago

    "only registering as suspended due to a clerical error"

    This is a serious issue. I knew someone who was charged with driving using a suspended license -- the person whose license was actually suspended had the same name and a birthdate only a day or two apart. Maybe not national news media but we need to get our databases to be accurate.

  17. Davedave   1 year ago

    All very well, except the licence was still suspended - albeit perhaps due to administrative issues - and what's more the perp _knew_ it was suspended, because he had been stopped, arrested, and charged, and that's why he was appearing before a judge. It's the unimaginable idiocy that is newsworthy, and the clerical error supposedly responsible for the licence still being suspended is uninteresting.

    So, as usual, Reason lies to make up the story it wants to report instead of the one that actually happened. The irony...

    1. Patrick Henry, the 2nd   1 year ago

      No it was not. A court ordered it reinstated, to that instantly mean it was no longer suspended. Just because that was never reported to the Dept of State doesn't change the fact that wasn't suspended. Had he known sooner, he would've fixed it before he was stopped and arrested and charged. He didn't, and regardless now the he did, he was ready to prove it. But the judge didn't wait to listen.

      Anybody who thinks he is in the wrong has never been on the side of the government screwing you over, and would be just as pissed at the situation.

  18. Dan S.   1 year ago

    So was that remote court hearing about the suspended license, or wasn't it? If it was, then being seen driving on the Zoom connection was extremely foolish, even if the suspension was a mistake. Perhaps to the point of being newsworthy.

    Of course, suspending peoples' driver licenses for reasons that have nothing to do with their driving records is extremely foolish in itself, but all states must now do this, or risk losing lots of Federal aid. If there is a renewed push to change that now, then some good will have come out of this incident, but I don't expect it.

  19. JohnZ   1 year ago

    Just so you will know to stay away from Chicago and Illinois entirely, they passed a get out of jail free law:
    https://cwbchicago.com/2024/06/fairness-and-equity-illinois-drivers-can-get-3-unpaid-tickets-a-year-before-license-suspension-under-newly-passed-law.html

  20. YuckFou   1 year ago

    When the media was savaging Sarah Palin, how many of you morons actually thought Tina Fay's line "I can see Russia from my front door" was what Palin said?

    All anybody remembers anymore is the lie.

  21. John F. Carr   1 year ago

    I knew a guy who faced a driving on a suspended license charge. He was eligible for reinstatement but had not gone through all the proper procedures. The judge dropped the charges after he went through the proper procedures (paid off the DMV). He was indisputably guilty and a sympathetic judge gave him a break because the system has real crimes to deal with. Another judge in another state could have found him guilty and suspended his license some more.

    1. Davedave   1 year ago

      The perp in this case might have been given more of a break if he hadn’t appeared in front of the judge, on Zoom, on charges of driving with a suspended licence _while driving_. A criminal mastermind, he ain’t.

      Really, it's not that hard. Wait a minute to answer the call, or pull over (and change seats), or let his passenger drive the last hundred yards. Or, say it's a RHD car and he's a passenger, and at least give the judge a chance to give him a break.

      1. Patrick Henry, the 2nd   1 year ago

        OR he did nothing wrong. Yes actually, that's the correct answer.

  22. David Perry   1 year ago

    Wow, Reason jumps in the wayback machine to roughly 1998 and realizes that national stories get made out of clickbait. They do realize this kind of 'news' happened even before social media, right?

    And funnily enough, the guys license actually was indeed suspended at the time, regardless of protestations about how complex the Michigan system is?

  23. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

    Would it be possible for the judge who ordered the license reinstated, back in 2022, to conduct an investigation to find out how his/her order was thwarted, and maybe even consider some punishment?

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      Steve Lehto explains why Billy is slightly incorrect in his take here:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PBy9P5CuBs

      Overall, I feel sorry for the guy, if he thought his license was unsuspended, but wasn't informed of the rest of the procedural steps he needed to take. And I have no idea why we are suspending people's DL's for 'failure to pay child support'. Seems like a counterproductive way to facilitate a situation where he *could* pay child support.

  24. rswallen   1 year ago

    The story continues: the Judge says the person in the video never possessed a license in the first place.
    https://dailycaller.com/2024/06/05/corey-harris-case-driving-suspended-license/

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

The Tax Bill Rewards States for Higher Rates of Food Stamp Fraud

Eric Boehm | 7.2.2025 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!