$7.5 Billion in Government Cash Only Built 8 E.V. Chargers in 2.5 Years
While the private sector builds hundreds of public chargers, the government spends billions of dollars for just a handful of charging stations.

In 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act included $7.5 billion to build 500,000 public charging stations for electric vehicles (E.V.s) across the country in an effort to boost a switch to the use of clean energy.
As Reason reported in December, not one charger funded by the program had yet come online. Now, six months later, the number of functional charging stations has ticked up to eight.
That news comes from an Autoweek article earlier this month. In March, The Washington Post reported that only seven were built; a charging station in Bradford, Vermont, opened in April, containing four E.V. fast chargers. Public chargers are either Level 2, which use alternating current electricity and take several hours to fully charge an all-electric vehicle from empty, or Direct Current Fast Charging (DCFC) superchargers, which use direct current and can charge in less than an hour.
Why so little progress? Alexander Laska of the center-left Third Way think tank told Autoweek's Jim Motavalli that the federal cash "comes with dozens of rules and requirements around everything from reliability to interoperability, to where stations can be located, to what certifications the workers installing the chargers need to have." Laska says the regulations "are largely a good thing—we want drivers to have a seamless, convenient, reliable charging experience—but navigating all of that does add to the timeline."
A spokesperson with the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program, which administers $5 billion of the $7.5 billion total, further told Motavalli that the delay is because "we want to get it right."
Thankfully, federal grants aren't the only way to build out charging infrastructure.
"US drivers welcomed almost 1,100 new public, fast-charging stations in the second half of 2023, a 16% increase," Bloomberg's Kyle Stock reported in January. And not just in big cities or progressive enclaves: Deep-red Idaho "switched on 12 new [DCFCs] between July and December," while "Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee welcomed 56 new fast-charging stations in the second half of 2023, an infrastructure increase of one-third."
While Stock notes that $5 billion of federal money is expected to roll out soon, "the vast majority of chargers added in the US last year were bets by for-profit companies on the future of battery-powered driving."
The most prominent company by far is Tesla, whose network of Superchargers includes over 57,000 DCFC chargers around the world and generated an estimated $1.74 billion of revenue in 2023 alone. Just in the fourth quarter of 2023, the company built 357 new stations, accounting for 3,783 charging ports.
Around two-thirds of all public chargers in the U.S. are manufactured for Teslas, but the company has also expanded its network for its competitors to use: In the 2025 model year, most major automakers' E.V.s will use the same charge port as Teslas and be able to access the Supercharger network.
Rivian, a Tesla competitor, is also building out its own DCFC network: In February 2024, it counted 400 chargers in 67 locations, with plans to expand further, and just like with Tesla's Superchargers, Rivian plans to make its chargers accessible to other models.
In fairness, both Tesla and Rivian have benefited from government handouts: State and local governments in Georgia promised Rivian a raft of incentives worth up to $1.5 billion. And Tesla has received at least $2.8 billion in federal, state, and local subsidies over the years, despite CEO Elon Musk's professed distaste for government intervention in the economy. In fact, Politico found in February that Tesla was the single largest recipient of funds disbursed by the federal NEVI program, winning "almost 13 percent of all EV charging awards from the law, earning it a total of more than $17 million in infrastructure grants."
But those companies still provide the best template for expanding access to public chargers.
While proponents of the federal regulations may defend the amount of red tape involved in the federal program, with demands on where a charging station can be placed and the types of licenses people need to build one, the fact is that the private sector is already building out a nationwide E.V. charging network that will be available to most drivers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I have a question about EVs. Do you think we can repurpose one of these new fangled superchargers and turn it into an electric chair? I know of a very special person convicted of 34 felony counts that may need one.
Those are DC, not AC. While I imagine DC can still kill someone, AC is more effective (as Thomas Edison once demonstrated with an elephant)
DC is just as effective
No, it's really really not. AC is better at arcing and jumping air gaps, especially at higher frequencies than DC.
If you were going to build an electric chair, you'd NEVER use DC.
I know of a very special person convicted of 34 felony counts that may need one.
Really? You're so well adjusted that you think Trump deserve the death penalty?
You might have noticed he's a troll.
Tee hee! It's fun to gloat over the outcome of a show trial, isn't it? After all, it's not like your comrades will ever turn on you and have you murdered for their entertainment, is it?
The only good thing about Stalin and Mao is that they both killed a hell of a lot of communists.
-jcr
Congratulations! You've been successfully trolled.
Kill yourself faggot
Congratulations! You've also been successfully trolled.
Let’s try it out on you first.
At a lunch & learn presentation today, I learned that my company has designed and installed over 1000 EV charging stations in the past 4 years.
Huh.
Harnessing the Power of the Pervfect Pelvic Thrusts of Spermy Daniels would be FAR more efficient! PLEASE, for the Sake of The ENVIRONMENT, cuntsult Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer AND Queen Spermy Daniels (Our Queen, Who Art Drenched in Vaseline), for details on this latest-and-greatest en-tittle-mint "green" program!
Government spending on "infrastructure" is a scam.
And Sharknado Warmunism is what covers it up when the same weather as is now, always has been, and ever shall be wrecks everything over and over, requiring more funding of political soft machines over and over.
Can someone please provide a translation of this?
I doubt even Hank fully understands his own gibbering.
How much of the money has been spent is the question I haven't seen answered.
Not $7.5 billion. The only spending so far has been for the 8 completed chargers.
By the time they get the rest built, cars will run off plasma, and fly.
Nah, give the progressives what they demand and cars will be powered by 1-2 horsepower.
Cars? No one will be able to own a car, and won't need one, when all the trains are ready.
1 horsepower horse
...instead of fry?
See: https://www.topgear.com/car-news/mythbusting-evs/mythbusting-world-evs-are-electric-cars-susceptible-catching-fire
Nothing left to cut.
7.5 billion could have purchased 150,000 gas-powered SUVs at 50K a pop, and provided safe, comfortable transportation to 150,000 families in need. Instead of 8 charging stations for virtue signaling yuppies.
Those SUV’s could be laid for by confiscating wealth from affluent democrats. Which shouldn’t be a problem, as they’re always insisting they be allowed to take money like that.
It was part of an infrastructure bill which passed both houses of Congress, wasn't it? Last time I checked, one of them had a Republican majority.
Ah, yes: The vote was 69–30 in the Senate on August 10, 2021, and 228–206 in the House on November 5, 2021.
Congress probably shouldn't be passing such laws, but it was a bipartisan effort which did so, so don't act so shocked.
"$7.5 Billion in Government Cash Only Built 8 E.V. Chargers in 2.5 Years."
I was reading in the Kiplinger Letter, a weekly financial newsletter India could surpass China as the leading economic titan in the world if it were not for India's rampant corruption.
Now an argument can be made the US is on the same level of corruption as India if not more so.
Note to foreign readers: By "corruption," American looters mean what the other half of the entrenched Kleptocracy did first.
No, not really, you senile old fuck.
All I've seen is typical government inefficiency, but if you have some evidence of corruption, please do share it with the authorities.
How many hookers and how much blow did they get for that 7.5 billion of the taxpayers' money?
-jcr
Chase will fix this!
If you enjoyed gas rationing while Tricky Nignew was carpet-bombing Cambodia, you'll LOVE electric power rationing while econazi scientist-impersonators are banning all access to energy. Look at Ecuador, the nation run entirely by the U.S. government's Drug Enforcement Administration. They have blackouts every week on average. Dollarizing and turning the economy over to the DEA did for Ecuador what it done for Haiti.
You know what I find hilarious?
Under the expert guidance of our LGBT pedo twink paternity leave Secretary of Transportation, there have been BOTH more Boeing incidents AND train wrecks than EV chargers built. (And an almost 40% ratio of bridge collapses to EV chargers!)
When questioned, the limp-wristed sissy likely child molester commented, “I’ve taken great strides in spreading awareness in my role as Secretary of the Trans community. Now, if you’ll excuse me, Hamas has invited me to kick off their Queers for Palestine event in Gaza at the top of the Al-Ghifari Tower. The invitation actually said something different, but I’m sure that was just a translation thing.”
Of you go then, Mayor Pete. Don’t worry about the carbon footprint of your jet to Palestine – totally worth it this time.
Dude. You gave a 'legal' pass to STEAL $7.5B on BS excuses.
What the F did you think 'armed-robbers' was going to do.
'Guns' don't make charging stations so the only reason 'Guns' were involved was to get away with STEALING.
Working with the Federal Government on infrastructure projects is a regular part of my job. On my current project, the Feds have assigned something like 30 different project managers, none of home is actually responsible for completing the project, and none of whom can answer simple questions like, "is this running on-time? How's the budget?"
By making dozens of supernumeraries responsible for the project, nobody is responsible.
WTH?
How has Rivian and Tesla figured out how to navigate the regulatory red tape to build EV chargers, and the Federal Government has not?
Titanic deck chairs:
There is no foreseen power source, nor grid to deliver it to provide for anything like the mandated number of EVs and it's going to absolutely require outlawing workable vehicles to get acceptance of EVs.
They suck on many, many levels and they do as a result of basic physics.
I’ll be honest, I’m surprised they have even done 8, my guess would have been lower
Does that $7.5 billion include building nuclear power stations to power the chargers? Because in the current political and regulatory environment, any project that relies on electric power being available whenever needed and does not include an expansion of 24-hour-a-day generation capacity is doomed in the long run - and also either a fraud, or the opiate dream of innumerate minds.
Dude. Didn’t you hear? Power comes from the outlet ???? lol..
So unless that outlet puffs a smoke; it's all pollution free! /s
The real question should be: how much of that $7.5 billion will actually go to building EV charging stations? How much of that $7.5 billion will be siphoned off by the bureaucracy itself for its own benefit. How much of that money will be funneled into the coffers of cronies and campaign donors? The prevailing attitude in the public sector is "if we fritter away the money, we'll just go get some more."
Note to all criminals: Put down your guns and start an organization that specializes in altruistic ideals whether it be for charities, religion or anything to "help the environment."
You'll make a fortune, never see prison and will live longer.
I hope the author of this article Joe Lancaster didn't write the headline and subhead, because they're both false. There has been $7.5 billion BUDGETED for chargers. The $7.5 billion has not been SPENT. The only spending was for the handful that have been completed. And having done Federal contract work myself, even that may not be factual, as the government isn't on anyone's list of speediest payers.