Congressional Republicans Launch 'Fishing Expedition' Against Progressive, Jewish, and Palestinian Nonprofits
The House Oversight and Education committees are investigating the sources of “malign influence” behind campus protests. They’re using tactics Republicans used to hate.

Remember when Republicans were against using the tax cops to go after political opponents? Well, they seem to have changed their minds.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R–Ky.) has made no secret of his desire to use finance laws against left-leaning activists. A few months ago, he complained that the IRS was going too easy on progressive nonprofits. Now he's found another angle of attack: insinuating that these organizations are part of an anti-Israel conspiracy.
Comer and House Education Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (R–N.C.) are "investigating the sources of funding and financing for groups who are organizing, leading, and participating in pro-Hamas, antisemitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American protests" on college campuses, they announced in a Tuesday letter.
"This investigation relates both to malign influence on college campuses and to the national security implications of such influence on faculty and student organizations," Comer and Foxx wrote.
Foxx objected when the shoe was on the other foot. In 2013, it was revealed that the IRS had been placing extra scrutiny on nonprofits whose paperwork included terms such as tea party and patriot. Foxx wrote an op-ed criticizing the "outrageous" demands for information that IRS investigators had made.
"The problem at the IRS is with more than the search terms it used. Whether conservative or liberal, targeting Americans is wrong," she stated. "The deeper problem is that government's taxing arm ever came to consider itself the arbiter of what constitutes legitimate free speech in the first place."
Asked about Foxx's earlier statements, her spokesman Alex Ives wrote to Reason that "what you are positing amounts to false equivalencies on many levels." He stated that Foxx was seeking to "ensure groups do not have financial ties to designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations," without citing specific examples.
"Do groups on campuses have a right to free speech? Of course," Ives said. "Do they have a right to have their ties to foreign financiers connected to terror organizations to go unscrutinized? Of course not."
The letter from Foxx and Comer demands that the Department of the Treasury provide all Suspicious Activity Reports, or bulletins on potential tax evasion and money laundering, for 20 different organizations. The list includes Students for Justice in Palestine and its sponsor, the WESPAC Foundation. It also names off-campus Muslim and Palestinian-American groups, Jewish peace movements, and many organizations that are not primarily focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
"This is part of a broader effort to demonize parts of the tax-exempt sector that a part of the Republican Party views as a key target in the war on woke," says Lara Friedman, president of the nonprofit Foundation for Middle East Peace, which has been tracking Congress' stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. "If you make this about supposedly fighting antisemitism, you bring parts of the Democratic Party with you."
Many of the groups listed are big names in progressive philanthropy: George Soros' Open Society Foundations, the Pritzker family's Libra Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Rockefeller organization gave several hundreds of thousands of dollars to Jewish Voice for Peace; another Jewish group for Palestinian rights called IfNotNow; the Adalah Justice Project, a Palestinian-American rights group; and Palestine Legal, a legal aid service for pro-Palestinian advocates in America.
"The RBF has had no direct involvement in the campus protests nor have we earmarked funds for them," Rockefeller Brothers Fund spokeswoman Sarah Edkins said in a statement last week. "Some RBF grantees have provided training, messaging, and/or legal support to student protest leaders. The Fund does not direct the activities of any grantee organizations."
Edkins added that the fund "respects Israel's right to exist and supports the right to self-determination for both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples."
The Open Society Foundations also gave several hundreds of thousands of dollars to Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow, according to Rolling Stone. The grant-making network told Politico that it "has funded a broad spectrum of US groups that have advocated for the rights of Palestinians and Israelis and for peaceful resolution to the conflict in Israel."
It's not clear why the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Libra Foundation wound up on the list. Last week, Politico named them as supporters of pro-Palestinian protests, because of their donations to the Tides Foundation, a clearinghouse for progressive groups that funds Jewish Voice for Peace, IfNotNow, Adalah, and Palestine Legal. But the Gates and Libra donations were earmarked for other causes.
Jewish Voice for Peace says that the congressional letter is "inaccurate, dangerous and a desperate attempt by right-wing legislators to criminalize public protest. These legislators are falsely and libelously smearing tens of thousands of students as antisemitic, simply because they are protesting the use of their tuition dollars in the massacres of Palestinian families."
Two of the groups listed in the letter, American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, also offered statements to Reason. The Libra Foundation declined to comment, and the Gates Foundation pointed to its comments to Politico. None of the other groups responded to emails asking for comment.
"AMP looks forward to demonstrating in any jurisdiction that it operates wholly within the laws of the United States, compliant with all laws and regulations governing U.S. nonprofit entities," the organization's attorney Christina Jump says. "AMP operates completely within the United States, raises funds completely within the United States, and utilizes those donations completely within the United States to support its mission of educating American Muslims and the American public on the rich history and culture of Palestine."
Edward Ahmed Mitchell, deputy director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, says that the letter "reads like a bad impersonation of Joseph McCarthy. Instead of advancing the goals of a foreign government by pursuing witch hunts against the American people, Rep. Foxx, Rep. Comer and other genocide-enablers in Congress should focus on washing the blood of over 30,000 slaughtered Palestinian civilians off their hands."
Republicans are not the only ones trying to bring the U.S. tax code into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In New York, some Democrats are trying to strip away nonprofit status from organizations that operate in Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territories. New York–based nonprofits have raised money to buy drones for settler militias and to maintain a military academy in a West Bank settlement.
The House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing in November 2023 on the "nexus" between campus protests and "terror financing." Soon after, the House passed a bill allowing the secretary of the treasury to shut down nonprofits based on vague insinuations of terrorist support. Last week, 15 Republican senators called on the IRS to revoke the nonprofit status of any organization that supported Students for Justice in Palestine.
Friedman, the Foundation for Middle East Peace president, believes that the congressional letter is more likely to have a "chilling effect" on nonprofits than to turn up any real evidence of illegal activity.
"It's partly a fishing expedition," she says. "And by lodging an accusation, they hope to paint a picture in the mind of the public."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is there a difference between nonprofits that are just campaign finance, and nonprofits that are subsidizing illegal activity like property damage and blocking traffic?
If I recall, the IRS under Obama was weaponizing audits to search for any evidence of misappropriated funds, and using the process as the punishments on conservative political organizations. That’s different than noticing g that a substantial number of people who are arrested at colleges are not students and are being funded by certain groups.
I’m not saying Congress is right to investigate or that this isn’t driven by political bias, but it’s also far from an apples to apples comparison. Many of these campus protest and anti war protests are violating laws, destroying property, infringing on the rights and free movement of others.
And as an aside, it was explicitly proven that the IRS was explicitly searching for groups to target based on political leanings, and not any sort of behavior. Maybe this is a similar witch hunt, or maybe there actually a behavior or certain groups at, say, UCLA and Columbia which raises questions about the legitimacy of these groups. Are they interested in protesting or in rioting and disruption?
If you fund-raise for a protest, don’t you want that protest to be carried out legally and not destructive?
If you fund-raise for a protest, don’t you want that protest to be carried out legally and not destructive?
Depends on what your true goals are.
It is a repeated pattern of Soros and leftist funded groups. Social disorder is the actual goal. And they don't even really hide that fact. They continuously discuss tearing down the capitalist system to implement their socialist systems.
Soros is a fan of a particular kind of socialism.
And Republicans a different kind.
But I guess it's all (R)elative.
If those guys had an ounce of honesty they'd say "touche".
Like you even know what honesty is.
This from the king of apples to fighter jets comparisons, and Mr. "boaf sides" only when a Democrat is caught doing something shitty.
It’s all (R)elative.
You mean (D)ifferent, right?
Nothing wrong with things being relative unless you actually want it to be (D)ifferent.
You’re like a retarded dog with a bone, aren’t you Sarc?
Post the (L)ist
And once again, Drunky showcases his democrat dumbassery.
And Republicans a different kind.
Do tell. What would that be?
A theocratic socialism. Duh.
#NotAllRepublicans
(Leadership is happy with good old fashioned socialism as long as they get to play controlled opposition though)
#itdoesntfuckingmatter
What kind?
Once again, this is the magazine that voiced the notion that Antifa is more of an idea than an organization because they don't carry membership cards or elect a leadership.
Like the Weather Underground, or any other mildly-retarded-or-better, violent political activist organization took roll call and checked IDs before setting shit on fire, tearing it down, or blowing it up.
You're too intelligent and too honest to be engaging them at their level.
And the bundy ranch people had it comming
The premise seems rather petti.
Principals, not principles.
Do you believe it’s impossible to draw a principled distinction between investigating the Tea Party movement and the campus anti war movement? Are these things entirely equal and opposite with no consistent principled differences?
Both movements are a threat to the people in power.
Both movements are popular with one tribe while abhorred by the other.
Both movements are deeply emotional for the people involved.
Both tribes want to shut down movements associated with the other tribe.
I see a lot of tribalism. One is right and the other is wrong, depends on which side you're on.
So no.
You see no difference between groups who riot and Tea Party protests that cleaned up after themselves.
https://i2i.org/how-much-trash-a-political-rally-leaves-for-others-to-clean-up-tells-you-something-doesnt-it/
Got it.
Principles indeed.
Really? The amount of trash left behind? That's how you are measuring intent?
Conservatives have just been raised by people who demand you clean up after yourself. Liberals leave places trashed no matter what they are doing. Camping sites where they haven't protested anything aren't cleaned up. Hotel Rooms they use look like a tornado blew through. They aren't clean people.
It's REALLY funny when they leave environmental protests trashing the place.
It is ironic, that's for sure.
Damn right. It just makes more moderates walk away from them marginalizing their ideas.
...yet they have all of the media behind them and tons of government funding. They've convinced huge swaths of youth in schools that the environment is THE issue.
I have never seen moderates much upset about it.
Moderates, it seems, aren't worth the tiniest sliver of a shit in the grand scheme of things.
The TPUSA is largely a grassroots group that wants to improve the country. All these Pro Hamas groups are are pro terror Marxist scum trying to bring down the country and funded by dark mo ey from people like Soros.
Case closed.
If one was to ask the other side of the aisle they'd say TPUSA is the terrorists. They'd be able to point to all sorts of stuff that they would assure you are proof of terrorism.
Why should I believe you over them?
I think it's all (R)elative.
ha!
Stop replying to your sock puppet.
I'm sure you meant (R)elated, right? Nothing wrong with relevant.
Relative. Not relevant.
I just think there might be a principled stance someone could walk that doesn’t tread along tribal lines.
Donating to political campaigns = no problem.
Funding protestors = no problem.
Donating to charitable causes = no problem.
Funding riots = problem.
Is there room to insert some objective criteria, here?
Now do J6.
Now do the FBI.
Do you believe I’ve ever said anything defending the J6 rioters?
Then investigating conservative organizations connected to J6 was cool? Just checking.
Investigate? Abso-fucking-lutely. If they planned in advance to riot, disrupt, cause property damage, attack people, that’s criminal activity. And there were assaults and property damage that actually happened on the day.
Do I think that these are all inherently the same thing as an insurrection? Fuck no. But crimes were committed, the NAP was not respected. Send the rioters to jail for rioting. But it’s not like someone was funding them and providing them with vital supplies, they had fucking flagpoles and no guns. Not like the campus protests where they’re getting tents, food, medical supplies, etc. for days on end.
Did you think this was going to be some kind of gotcha? Is it impossible to imagine setting an objective standard that works on the left and the right?
“Then investigating conservative organizations connected to J6 was cool?”
Definitely! If, and it’s a big if, if they were suspected of inciting the riot.
But that’s not what your DNC Stasi did, is it, Sarcasmic? They used J6 as an excuse to round up the Democratic party’s political opponents who weren’t even peripherally connected.
And I know that you know this.
Anyways, if they were actually interested in investigating who incited the J6 riot, they could start at their DC office and Quantico and then have a chat with Madame Speaker.
"Now do J6."
A mostly peaceful protest that the Left has held up as their Reichstag fire for years.
I doubt anyone seeking funding says, "We plan to set shit on fire and overturn cars" on the application form.
The NDN Colective found that out the hard way when they wanted to protest Trump coming to Mount Rushmore for the 4th of July. An Antifa group "joined" their protest. When the NDN protestors pulled the two rental vans into a trafic blocking position to protest something the Antifa folks got out the knives and flattened all four tires on both vans. Not what NDN was expecting.
Then it turned into a fucking mess with cops in riot gear and tow trucks showing up. After the cops arrested everyone that resisted the tow trucks had to drag the vehicles 90 degrees to line them up for towing. Fucked up the rims and likely cause damage to the suspension.
I doubt the NDN Collective will EVER let strangers join up with one of their protests ever again. I suspect the deposits on those vans was lost and then some for the damages done.
That seems very “Frog and Scorpion” to me.
They should, then, have no problem nor difficulty demonstrating that they had nothing to do with it.
"When the NDN protestors pulled the two rental vans into a traffic blocking position" they had already crossed the line themselves. You do realize that, right? After that it was just a matter of degree.
Well, we just learned from Sarcasmic that the campus pro-Hamas movement, despite being funded by Soros and the Qatari royal family, is... wait for it... here it comes... "a threat to the people in power".
Bwahahahahahahaha... Sarc's been reading the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, again. "Jews run the world!"
You couldn't invent Sarcasmic if you tried.
But that's not all, there's even more: "Both movements are popular with one tribe while abhorred by the other"
Sarcasmic thinks protesting unfair taxation and wiping out the Jews from the river to the sea is same-same. Morally equivalent... or at least he wants you to think they are.
But he's not done: "I see a lot of tribalism."
I BET YOU DO!
Probably because you're the Blue Tribe's medicine man. "Everywhere I look from the flap of my teepee I see injuns".
That was such a huge self-own. Absolutely no awareness of what he said.
There are 2 principles here:
A) Foreign influence. Seems like you used to be against and aghast at that. We know that money is coming in to finance legal and illegal activity from the Gulf States.
2) Taxpayer money. Are tax exempt orgs financing partisan or even illegal activity? And how much taxpayer money is being funneled thru NGOs to these clowns?
Foreign influence. Seems like you used to be against and aghast at that.
Not sure what argument I never made that you are arguing against.
Are tax exempt orgs financing partisan or even illegal activity?
Last I checked, in a free country with presumption of innocence the government is supposed to start with actual illegal activity. You know, like criminal investigations. Start with a crime and work backwards. Not fishing expeditions by tax agents against people over their political beliefs.
For one.... you have accused Russia of helping Trump. Defending the prosecutions of the dozen or so Russians who bought ads on Facebook.
And second, you only seem to care about crimes for one side. You often ran to deflect from BLM riots then demanded 20 year sentences for J6.
I think being a hypocrite is his kink.
We haven’t had presumption of innocence for most non-politically connected people in a good long while (at least not in the court of public opinion).
Yeah I'm much more concerned with NGOs getting taxpayer money whatever their political affiliation.
Okay. Here was sarc regarding J6 protestors facing 20 years.
sarcasmic 2 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Charges of trespassing, vandalism and interfering with government business are sufficient. No need to add political crimes to the list.
But once again assaults, vandalism, etc is fine for leftist protests.
Mostly peaceful protests.
Being pro Trump is a capital offense to Sarc. Even worse than the bartender watering down his bottom shelf liquor.
OH NOES, ANOTHER FISHING EXPEDITION!
Folks high on their perch will carp about this.
They did it first so it's ok?
When did you complain about it during the Tea Party?
Principles right?
Different, because reasons.
(D)ifferent, because (R)easons.
Nice.
He did complain about it under Obama, TBF.
"Wet Roads Cause Rain, Jewish Civilians Being Slaughtered and Kidnapped Trigger Anti-Jewish Protests, and Boat Full Of Fish Triggers Fishing Expedition" - Matthew "How Retarded Can I Make Myself Look?" Petti
Right-wing bigots gonna bigot.
And continue to get their asses kicked by their betters in the culture war.
Carry on, clingers.
Were you occasionally sober, you might recognize yourself for the bigoted clown that you are. Carry on, Reverend.
He has to be some right-winger astroturfing to make the left look bad.
No, Artie really is that insufferable.
Didn’t he slither in here with the Volokh crowd?
Funny how the prior fishing expeditions were ignored if not praised but suddenly there is a problem because the people that use violence as speech are targeted and Mathew doesn't like his friends being held responsible for their actions.
They should stick to investigating the weaponization of government, censorship and covid insanity.
>>Remember when Republicans were against using the tax cops to go after political opponents?
the chick on the Daily Show is awful have you thought about replacing her?
I don't care who gives what to whom as long as the money doesn't come from the taxpayers.
End all subsidies and foreign aid would be a step in the right direction for DC, but we all know that won't happen.
'Remember when Republicans were against using the tax cops to go after political opponents? Well, they seem to have changed their minds.'
And remember when Democrats ranted about Big Money in politics?
Yup, it's a shit sandwich, but until both parties annihilate each other, we are better off if one prevents the other from domination.
Far better would be to stop voting for both sides. Doesn't matter which one is in charge, it's a shit sandwich for everyone.
US Watchdog Says 12% of US Aid to Ukraine in 2nd Quarter 'Delinquent or Unaccounted For'
Some 12% of US security aid provided to Ukraine from January 1 through March 31 was delinquent or unaccounted for, the US Defense Department Inspector General said.
- Russia Today
Due to Bidenflation, now 12% for the big guy?
Russia Today
And unlike Hamas reports 20B Children killed by IDF and 7... no 6 min. before every hospital in Gaza catches fire for lack of infrastructure. Does Russia inflate the number to make the US/Ukraine look more inept and defeated, deflate the number to make them look like a US-backed threat, or just report the numbers as they hear them because that's really easy and does both?
It don't understand anything any longer in 2024.
Jewish groups are funding pro Palestinian protests.
Democrats (who have the larger share of the Jewish vote and who collaborate seamlessly in the current administration) are loudly pro Palestinian and antisemitic. Republicans and conservatives are supporting a war begun by a KGB operative and cheering when the Russians are planting hammer and sickle flags next to the bodies of white, Christian Europeans. I swear, nothing makes logical sense any longer, or my analytical skills are declining with age.
"Republicans and conservatives are supporting a war begun by a KGB operative and cheering when the Russians are planting hammer and sickle flags next to the bodies of white, Christian Europeans."
Not sure how you get that from "We've spent numerous billions of dollars on this with no oversight for a country long known for corruption. We should stop funding it" but you do you.
Well, the same Republicans are adamant about funding Israel's fight against Hamas (despite theoretically Israel having plenty of resources) but against funding Ukraine in its defense of Europe from a hostile invader. Even that argument is logical (the US population, even more so those in Congress and the media and the executive branch, have more historical and familial ties to Israel than to Ukraine). However, there are plenty of vocal Republicans who are clearly on Team Russia and go beyond merely stating that the US should not fund Ukraine. They excuse any Russian behavior and even make it clear they would rejoice at a Russian victory. These are the same people who also support Israel vocally. Which makes no sense since during the Cold War, Israel was more often than not on NATO's side, and an adversary of the Soviet Union, which supported the various Palestinian factions.
"Well, the same Republicans are adamant about funding Israel’s fight against Hamas (despite theoretically Israel having plenty of resources) but against funding Ukraine in its defense of Europe from a hostile invader."
Israel is a useful country. Ukraine is not. Hate to break it to you, foreign aid should be based SOLELY on the benefit to the USA. We owe nobody anything.
"However, there are plenty of vocal Republicans who are clearly on Team Russia and go beyond merely stating that the US should not fund Ukraine. They excuse any Russian behavior and even make it clear they would rejoice at a Russian victory. "
This is where evidence would be presented.
I, uh, note it was not.
There is a reason.
I do not care who wins that war. "We" are funding Ukraine because they bribed our President through his son. That is the ONLY reason the spigot never got turned off.
Your way of thinking ignores that there are hundreds of other countries on this planet. One US-centric theory was that Covid was a plot to allow mail in ballots in the US presidential election, while ignoring the disruption to the hundreds of other countries. The Ukraine theory you propose also ignores NATO's incentives and the dozens of other countries that support Ukraine financially and militarily. I doubt the Europeans doing it to protect Hunter Biden, as opposed to their very survival. (Sovietic troops already went through Europe during WW2, and to quote an old man from Central Europe "we're not too eager to invite them back any time soon"). As an American, you really cannot fathom the horror regular Europeans still have at the imagery of Soviet troops rolling in with their hammer and sickle banners and Lenin busts. To an American, the closest thing would be to see military aged males rolling into your town in Toyota pickup trucks waving huge ISIS flags.
As for Israel's usefulness to the US, aside from familial and religious ties, it's not as strong or strategically placed as Saudi Arabia, for example. It's a great ally, don't get me wrong, and was a faithful ally of the US during the Cold War. But today, Ukraine is arguably just as important geopolitically as a buffer, protecting from total annihilation the civilized world and the closest societies (in terms of culture and political system) to the American one.
HaHaHa. No it's not funded by foreign terrorists groups. It's funded by the US Government and their Commie-Indoctrination department.
NGO are government funded, so they do the bidding of the government.
It's all about Trump. These groups/organizations the Republicans are going after are just warming up for what they will do if Trump is sworn in as the next President of the U.S.A. next January.
The idea is to weaken them if not take some out of action, so that America won't go through 2020 riots again after Trump is sworn in, albeit at a much more destructive level.