Is America's Blank Check for Israel Ending?
President Biden is holding up a shipment of 3,500 bombs to Israel, after months of resisting any conditions on U.S. aid to Israel.

President Joe Biden is holding up a shipment of 3,500 guided bombs to Israel after U.S.-backed negotiations for a ceasefire and an exchange of captives with Gaza broke down. It's the most significant exercise of U.S. leverage over Israel in a long time—and comes after Biden spent months resisting the idea of any limits on how the Israeli military could use American taxpayer aid.
For months, leaks had been coming out of the White House about how frustrated Biden was with the Israeli war effort. At the same time, the Biden administration pushed through weapons shipments to Israel without notifying Congress, reallocated weapons from Ukraine to Israel, rejected any conditions on that aid, and worked to pass several billion dollars in additional funding for Israel.
Last month, the Biden administration was considering cutting off U.S. aid to Israel's Netzah Yehuda Battalion over alleged human rights abuses, including the death of a Palestinian-American retiree in their custody. Under pressure from Israel and Republican leadership, the administration walked back the decision.
This week's Israeli offensive into Rafah, a town in the southern Gaza Strip where around a million Palestinians are sheltering, seems to have changed things. Politico reported on Tuesday morning the Biden administration held up a load of Joint Direct Attack Munitions and Small Diameter Bombs—which was ready for shipment to Israel—in order to send a political message.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin confirmed today that the administration was "reviewing some near-term security assistance shipments in the context of unfolding events in Rafah."
Biden has advised Israel not to invade Rafah without protecting the civilian population. He drew a vague, confusingly-worded red line in a March interview with MSNBC.
"The defense of Israel is still critical, so there's no red line I'm gonna cut off all weapons so they don't have the Iron Dome [missile defense system] to protect them," he said in response to a question about Rafah. "But there's red lines that, if he crosses and they continue—you cannot have 30,000 more Palestinians dead as a consequence of going after—there's other ways to deal, to get to, to deal with, the, with the trauma caused by Hamas."
The Israeli army began its invasion of Rafah after talks with Hamas, which is still holding around a hundred Israeli hostages from the October 7 attacks, broke down. CIA Director Bill Burns was in Egypt supervising the talks.
Hamas had announced on Monday that it had accepted an Egyptian-Qatari proposal to exchange hostages for a ceasefire, under terms similar but not identical to a deal Israel agreed to last month. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the new terms were unacceptable to Israel and the army would go into Rafah directly to retrieve the hostages instead.
Along with any concern with Palestinian lives, Biden might be driven by the sense that his plans to end the war were frustrated and Netanyahu is trying to stick the blame on the Biden administration. After talks broke down, Israeli officials told Axios that they felt like "Israel got played" by the Biden administration. A senior U.S. official responded that "there have been no surprises" from the Americans.
Cutting off the flow of free bombs is a signal that, rather than preferring that Israel do more to protect Palestinian civilians, Washington actually wants the war to end soon.
Still, the Biden administration has been keen to keep any decision-making inside the White House and out of the public's hands. The U.S. State Department was scheduled to report to Congress today on whether the Israeli military complies with international law.
Like the shipment of bombs, that report has been delayed. Biden, it seems, is not ready to share the concerns that drove his decision-making with the public.
CORRECTION: This article originally misstated the CIA director's name.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is America's Blank Check for Israel Ending?
Hopefully. And if Joe "I Am a Zionist" Biden surprisingly contributes to such a change, I'll give him credit.
Those campus "protests" must be working.
Better than your "brain" is working.
If so, it's about time.
I am wondering when the impeachment will happen.
Trump was impeached by somebody THINKING he did it.
Didn’t we impeach a guy for doing something like this ?
No.
The inquiry reported that Trump withheld military aid[a] and an invitation to the White House from Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy …..
You assume Biden’s motives are pure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump#:~:text=The%20first%20impeachment%20of%20President,on%20both%20articles%20of%20impeachment.
Yeah. Withholding weapons because you didn't get dirt on your political opponent Joe Biden is exactly like withholding weapons that are used to kill civilians.
I’m all in favor of cutting off arms shipments.
But it’s also obvious that Biden has an overwhelming political need to please two incompatible factions of the Democratic party on the Gaza issue, and he (or whoever makes his decisions now) is fully aware that this move will repair some of his political credit with the antiwar faction.
It’s down to “knowingly benefit” vs “intentionally benefit” and given how little concern for civilians Biden showed when gleefully supporting the Iraq War, I’m inclined to believe the political benefit was his *sole* motivation.
One quibble: there is no panties faction in the DNC, there’s only antiwar-we-don’t-like people (and even then only some of the time).
I watch all this gleefully as it is fracturing the Democrat party badly.
Hopefully this will also affect the Republican party as well.
There is nothing either democratic or republican about either party.
Youre not a bright one are you Ed.
….withholding weapons that are used to kill civilians.
Are we sending non-lethal weapons to Israel?
I make no assumptions. You asked whether Trump had been impeached for something similar and the answer is no.
https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres755/BILLS-116hres755enr.pdf
Full on ignorant aren't you shrike.
See the articles of impeachment here:
https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres755/BILLS-116hres755enr.pdf
Can you explain why, SRG2?
Yes - see posted links above.
Very much did.
However, I think I might root for Biden here.
If the President is now able to just choose to ignore the laws passed by Congress, then future Presidents have that power.
Destroying a lot of the bills Biden is so proud of would be amusing and fun.
>President Biden is holding up a shipment of 3,500 bombs to Israel, after months of resisting any conditions on U.S. aid to Israel.
This shipment was congressionally authorized. So . . . when is the Biden impeachment.
I am shock the media is not demanding it.
They are waiting for Biden to die so they can have the first posthumous impeachment.
The way Biden is failing, it could be any day now.
>the Biden administration held up a load of Joint Direct Attack Munitions and Small Diameter Bombs
In other words, the Biden administration withheld the precision weapons needed to minimize collateral damage. Thus helping Hamas' strategy of ensuring maximum Palestinian collateral deaths to get international pressure on Israel to allow Hamas to continue to kill Israelis.
Israel doesn't want weapons to minimize collateral damage.
>you cannot have 30,000 more Palestinians dead as a consequence of going after—there's other ways to deal, to get to, to deal with, the, with the trauma caused by Hamas."
How many civilians did we kill in Afghanistan and Iraq in response to 9/11?
How many innocent people around the world have died because of Washington's aggressive foreign policy failures?
>The Israeli army began its invasion of Rafah after talks with Hamas, which is still holding around a hundred Israeli hostages from the October 7 attacks, broke down. CIA Director Bill Barr was in Egypt supervising the talks.
We'll fail to mention who the recalcitrant party is.
We'll fail to mention that Hamas refuses to return the hostages unless they get 30 Palestinian terrorists back for everyone - and that they're gonna be giving some of their hostages back dead.
Jewish tradition holds that recovering a dead hostage is a worthwhile goal. They even have teams that go in with tweezers and baggies after a bombing to collect pieces of bodies.
>under terms similar but not identical
Oho! The antisemitism leaks out around the lies you are telling here. Its disgusting. Petti, you don't have to support the US providing support to Israel. You do, if you are a decent human being, need to stop lying to protect Hamas.
Meanwhile Israel stabs America in the back whenever they feel like it.
Such as when?
If you're going to bring up the USS Liberty as your only example . . .
>Washington actually wants the war to end soon.
Funny how they don't want that for Ukraine.
Why?
Well, the Ukraine war allows them to funnel money to themselves and protecting Hamas gets them the Michigan votes.
Unlike Ukraine, the Biden crime family wasn’t laundering money in Israel.
Biden knows that the fastest way to end a war is to surrender. Ask the Afghans who helped the US and were left behind for the Taliban to capture.
The fundamental principle of tribal warfare is "women and children first", that is kill women and children first. Dead children don't grow up to seek revenge and dead women don't give birth to children that will grow up to seek revenge.
For Hamas, this is a tribal war, for Israel it isn't. Only one side attempts to limit the deaths of civilians. Only one side measures their success by body count, either their enemy's civilians or their own. Biden chose the side waging tribal warfare.
Tribal warfare doesn't kill women and children.
They take and rape the women, keep them as slaves, raise the youngest kids as their own and kill the older ones.
Ron Paul states this very reason why: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/great-ukraine-robbery-not-over-yet-ron-paul
>Like the shipment of bombs, that report has been delayed. Biden, it seems, is not ready to share the concerns that drove his decision-making with the public.
Likley because the State Department couldn’t find enough of a wedge to say that Israel is breaking ‘international law’. Likely the SD report says that Israel is not only complying with international standards (that we don’t apply to the Russians or Chinese or . . . really, anyone else) *BETTER* than the United States has ever done in its whole history.
When a report is delayed you know its because its embarrassing for the regime.
American officials just cannot seem to control themselves from meddling in the cesspools of billions of people around the globe. Israel is well within justifiable behavior in trying to eliminate Hamas from Gaza as a condition of ending the war. On the other hand, there is no American defense security need for us to arm and support Israel during any of this. If Israel wants to buy arms from American arms manufacturers, let them. No matter how disgustingly our government officials behave it never seems to occur to American citizens to question the meddling, even as the Federal government drifts ever closer to bankruptcy and even after multiple serial international military and political disasters over the last several decades.
…. after multiple serial international military and political disasters over the last several decades.
Biden had his finger in many of those.
I agree but Israel has very strong lobbyists in Washington as well as owning and controlling the mainstream media. besides, who knows what the zionists have on every politician, after all what was Jeffery Epstein doing? he worked for the MOSSADD and his job was to honeytrap politicians, media types, business people and even sports figures so they could later on be blackmailed into supporting whatever Israel wishes.
Epstein didn't work for Mossad and the 'zionists' - are they in the room with us now, John?
Strange things to withhold, considering that JDAMs are very accurate and you don’t need to drop a bunch of iron bombs with less accuracy when one JDAM will take out the target with less collateral damage.
Actual encouragement for them to drop a nuke.
Nukes are so cool!! Especially in a strip of land the size of Raleigh NC and a country the size of New Jersey!! And bonus points for nuclear fallout on Egypt and Jordan!!
That’s not where I was headed with this, but you do you.
Not if you need votes from the Hamas sympathizers and donors in your own party.
I'd give the regime some grace if they weren't the ones initially demanding this be passed now, all other concerns be damned.
Who else would Hamas supporters vote for? Trump? Kennedy?
And Trump would be way more militant than Biden.
“Is America’s Blank Check for Israel Ending?”
No.
Purely symbolic move, purely for domestic political consumption. I predict it will be cleared up almost immediately – if it hasn’t already -by the US announcing Israel promised privately to follow conditions on usage of the weapons, with no such announcement from the Israelis themselves.
The blank check may not be ending but soon will bounce higher than one of Elon Musks Space X rockets.
What's going to happen when the entire system collapses? Then what?
Jews might need to reconsider their affiliation with the Democrats. They HATE you.
Always have, they’re just being more open about it now.
The question you should be asking is: Is the Biden Administration now actively siding with the same terrorists that openly scream Death to America?
First the access to the $10B for Tehran - which is Hamas' financier. Then another $9B to "Gaza" - which means straight to Hamas. Now this.
Washington actually wants the war to end soon.
Or, their flipping to Team Babies In Ovens is evidence that they VERY MUCH want the war to continue. Rather than Israel stamping out "Palestine" for good and bringing the war to and end, this guarantees that it continues playing out. In the meantime, left-wing progressive neonazis continue wreaking havoc, the American dollar continues to devalue, and political points are scored by pandering to Marxists for siding with the "oppressed" terrorists.
Then again, it could also just be the Biden Administration obeying its Chinese masters, who's doing their Iranian buddies a solid.
Why not both?
White people need to let POC work their own shit out.
We can only hope so. Israel has been a vampire parasite on the neck of the American people for far too long. It's time to stop it and that goes for ALL U.S. foreign aid everywhere. Time to end it. We cannot afford it any longer as America is broke and bankrupted from it. America is not Israel's bitch. No more wars in the middle east, no more Americans being sacrificed on the alter of zionism. No more trillions of dollars wasted in needless, useless wars and disastrous foreign policies.
It's time to put the Israeli lobby in their place.
Congress is a disgrace with their latest attempt at criminalizing free speech especially over Israel. This is just another example as to who runs congress. I don't have to spell it out as everyone knows this but is too afraid to talk about for fear of being attacked.