6 States
Plus: Stormy's testimony, colleges posting bail, Optimus rising, RFK's brainworms, and more...

Your vote probably doesn't matter: "The titanic Biden-Trump election likely will be decided by roughly 6% of voters in just six states," reports Axios. The truly contested states in 2024 will probably be Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—same as the 2020 battlegrounds—with a possibly contested seventh state, North Carolina. And, within those six states, both campaigns are calculating that it's really only about 6 percent of voters who are truly fence-sitters.
New April polling "found [President Joe] Biden is ahead in just one of the seven states most likely to determine the outcome of his matchup with [former President] Donald Trump, leading Michigan by 2 percentage points," reports Bloomberg. "Biden trails the presumptive GOP nominee slightly in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and his deficit in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and North Carolina is larger." Political analysts believe that some of this is due to dismal views of the economy, which voters are more likely to pin on Biden. (For better or worse, people frequently blame economic woes on the sitting president. In Biden's case, given the massive COVID-era spending—which Trump also had a hand in—which massively spiked inflation, it arguably makes a bit more sense.)
"Education now transcends race as the best predictor of voting," Doug Sosnik, a senior adviser to former President Bill Clinton, told Axios. "People are increasingly choosing to live around others who share their values and beliefs, which has led to a homogenization of how communities vote."
It's going to be a very tight race, decided by a very small handful of voters.
Stormy takes the stand: This week, porn star Stormy Daniels, whose tryst with Trump (and pocketing of hush money payments) is central to the criminal trial against Trump, took the stand.
"The charges against Mr. Trump stem from her story of sex with him during that 2006 celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, a story she was shopping a decade later, in the closing days of the presidential campaign," reports The New York Times. "Mr. Trump's longtime lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, paid Ms. Daniels $130,000 in hush money before Election Day, and the former president is accused of falsifying business records to cover up reimbursements for Mr. Cohen."
As for the sex itself, Daniels' testimony seemed to be tinged with trauma rhetoric, claiming that even though she never said no outright, there was a "power imbalance" and implied that it was something less than consensual. "I was staring up at the ceiling, wondering how I got there," she said on the stand.
As for the hush money, Daniels claimed that "my motivation wasn't money," which is…a little confusing, given that she accepted a large sum in 2016. (The judge, once the jury was out of the room, said that Daniels might have "credibility issues.")
Scenes from New York: This is not only wrong on the merits, but also a terribly inappropriate soundbite coming from our esteemed governor, Kathy Hochul.
"Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word 'computer' is," - New York Governor Kathy Hochul, saying something that would get a Republican instantly cancelled, but it's (D)ifferent. pic.twitter.com/zcntbt8fKg
— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) May 7, 2024
QUICK HITS
- The U.S. pauses weapons shipments to Israel over the Rafah invasion.
- How the University of Southern California is trying to hold commencement festivities despite pro-Palestine protests.
- "Homeowners with mortgages hold just under $17 trillion in equity, a record high, per a report out this week," reports Axios. "A record $11 trillion of home equity is 'tappable,' meaning homeowners can borrow against it while still maintaining at least 20% equity in the house, per the report, which looks at data from March. About 48 million folks have access to tappable equity, with an average of $206,000 per mortgage holder."
- Literal brainworms: Long-shot presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has just revealed that, a little more than a decade ago, he began experiencing severe brain fogginess and memory loss that doctors ultimately attributed to a dead parasite in Kennedy's brain, which the presidential candidate says may have eaten a portion of it (!). Kennedy says there are no lingering effects from the parasite, and his spokeswoman said, when asked if his mental acuity was compromised from the health issue, "That is a hilarious suggestion, given the competition." (Kind of an amazing diss, if you ask me.)
- The college posted bail for its students?
Emerson College posted bail for its arrested students, asked that charges not be pressed, committed to not disciplining them, and offered summer housing until their legal issues are resolved.
Now President Jay Bernhardt is apologizing and setting up a bias response team. pic.twitter.com/RE8pxWu2Eu
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) May 7, 2024
- Inside some really egregious data manipulation:
To summarize, Zucman's "stunning graph" in the NYT is a result of two acts of data manipulation.
1. He suppresses the true effective tax rate on the rich over time by misallocating corporate tax incidence to them.
2. He simultaneously inflates the rate for the poor by excluding… pic.twitter.com/6IrbqtvNj9
— Phil Magness (@PhilWMagness) May 4, 2024
- Optimus (who is the robot, not the child, to be clear) progressing!
This was Optimus not long ago pic.twitter.com/nqlXuSYCkQ
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 7, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Your vote probably doesn't matter...
GASP!
Now it’s fortified!
It's a suitor!
I'm in that 6%. (Not gonna say which state, but it's one of the mentioned swing ones), and I have no affiliation with Trump or Biden. Thing is, even after all those qualifiers, my vote still doesn't matter.
That’s what fortification is for.
I'm also in one of those states and usually just vote for whoever is in the L line at the time. Unless something dramatic happens, I'm pretty sure I won't be doing that this time around.
Forget the whole thing. My usual go-to is telling my boss I am going out to vote, but meeting up with my chick for a nooner instead.
Nice!
I was in a swing state, and still voted L, for decades. I chose to vote for Trump on the outside chance that Hillary Clinton could be defeated, and not because I wanted to vote for Trump.
I chose to vote for Trump on the outside chance that Hillary Clinton could be defeated, and not because I wanted to vote for Trump.
Strategically and reluctantly?
Yes. And because the L's gave us Gary "I agree with 73% of what Bernie Sanders says" Johnson and Bill "I'm not a gun grabber anymore" Weld and I really couldn't support that ticket. I voted Trump instead of staying home.
You'd think that the Libertarian Party could find someone who doesn't spend time promoting the views of left wing statists like Sanders. They should expend energy promoting life, liberty and property in ways that affect people. Things like banning gas stoves, gasoline automobiles and petroleum pipe lines are stuff that people care about because they can feel the effects. But no, the Libertarians would rather show how much they are like Democrats and Republicans.
Why you need to join an activist group to find and pay for unfilled ballots for you to use.
"Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word 'computer' is," - New York Governor Kathy Hochul, saying something that would get a Republican instantly cancelled, but it's (D)ifferent. pic.twitter.com/zcntbt8fKg"
It's no wonder black people have no clue about getting a proper ID to vote.
...so we will take it away and use it for you.
Which is why there is no need for WIDESPRREAD voter fraud.
The titanic Biden-Trump election likely will be decided by roughly 6% of voters in just six states...
Can you imagine what campaigns would look like if electoral votes were assigned per district? Chaos.
Could you imagine the levels of fortification needed for that many districts?
It would take 36DD chess.
I haven't watched any of Stormy's movies, but isn't that what Alvin Bragg is currently doing?
Bow-chicka-bow-bow...
Probably be a lot cheaper. It would up the incentive to gerrymander districts even further than it already is. With the Court saying that it isn't their job to stop partisan gerrymandering, we'd end up with the presidency being decided by how state legislatures draw maps rather than how people actually vote.
Sounds like a good time to redraw the states.
Biden trails the presumptive GOP nominee slightly in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and his deficit in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and North Carolina is larger.
Is ballot harvesting legal in those states? If it is then these polls don't matter.
It's not like Pennsylvania had more votes cast than eligeable voters
Math is raciss!
You're right, they didn't:
https://www.vote.pa.gov/About-Elections/Pages/Fact-checking-PA-election-claims.aspx
Ah, a government "fact check". So reliable.
It doesn’t even answer the actual objection (that votes exceed number of registered/eligible voters). Instead, it plays with words and gives two different numbers: (1) total number of ballots cast and (2) total number of ballots cast for the presidential race. 2 should be less than 1 – and it is by about 30k. But neither of those numbers is the number of registered/eligible voters.
If I'm reading their data correctly, it equates to about a 75% turnout. That sounds absolutely massive, but maybe it wasn't. out of the norm. They show massive turnouts for all presidential elections, so maybe PA is always a show of fuckery, or maybe they all love doing their civic duty and voting.
The original source of the claim is Republican state Rep. Frank Ryan. Is he reliable? It is universally debunked online. Is there a deep dive defending this claim? I can't find one.
Ballot harvesting is illegal on Arizona despite multiple lawsuits by dems to make it legal.
But even then, with many examples of videos and testimony, state never pursues it. So in reality there is no law.
If you think that Motor-Voter was a bad idea, wait until they advocate registering with your mail-in vote.
esteemed governor, Kathy Hochul.
Really?
Proggies gotta signal fealty don't they.
Esteemed by who, is the operative question.
Whom.
Would you say I have a plethora of pinatas, Jefe?
I know it's not connected. I just had Three Amigos on my mind.
And here I thought it was esteamed, as in es a steaming pile of shit.
I'm sure she holds herself in high esteem.
I assume Liz was being sarcastic.
...though she never said no outright, there was a "power imbalance" and implied that it was something less than consensual.
A reminder that consent can be withdrawn at any time, even an entire presidential term later.
Actually 18 years later in this case.
If he'd knocked her up the kid would be an adult by now.
And able to vote.
Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word 'computer' is...
These Democratic politicians live in interesting bubbles.
Don't worry they are pretty good with the metric system
9mm
1 kilo
10 cc
10cc….
Obviously, I’m not in love.
I used to face hese guys in high school debate tournaments. They hosted one.
Bronx Science has produced the most Nobel laureates in science of any secondary school in the world. Bronx Science alumni have also won two Turing Awards, sometimes unofficially referred to as the Nobel Prize in computer science; six National Medals of Science, the nation’s highest scientific honor; and nine Pulitzer Prizes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronx_High_School_of_Science &
Then there’s
https://www.hsctbronx.org/
https://lehmancs.club/
https://www.bcc.cuny.edu/academics/academic-departments/mathematics-and-computer-science-department/student-activities/ &
https://www.fordham.edu/undergraduate-admission/majors-and-minors/computer-science/
Sheesh!
Yeah, but Jewish kids and Asian kids from the boroughs don't count.
Stated only half-facetiously.
And Stuyvesant High School (Bronx High School of Science's main competitor in New York) is second in Nobel Prizes. Thanks to DEI, those schools won't maintain their status.
These schools don't provide the best education, they are simply systems for having smart kids compete against each other for the "honor" of attending Ivy League colleges. My sons received much better educations from Lake Washington High School in Seattle than I ever got at Stuyvesant. Ivy League colleges have lost their luster so the incentive to go to the specialized New York high schools is not what it was.
The U.S. pauses weapons shipments to Israel over the Rafah invasion.
You know who else disarmed Jews?
Ok, I’m gonna break the rule, but it’s too good to pass up.
Biden is literally Hitler!
Gavin Newsome?
Soros?
Pharaoh?
The Spanish Inquisition? With their three strengths of cunning, surprise, and knowledge, as well as a love of silly outfits. With their four strengths…..
The thief of Baghdad?
The retirement of Sandy Koufax?
Bill Weld?
Wasn’t the 1st Impeachment for Trump about delaying arms deals to try to get a country to do what he wanted?
This is (D)ifferent.
It is, because Israel is committing literal genocide! - Herr Misek and Herr Misconstrueman
Mel Brooks?
Man, Biden is the most brutally open on-the-take President we've ever had.
Ukraine bribed him. Israel did not. Massive difference in treatment.
If only Israel had offered Biden a lifetime supply of ice cream...
"That is a hilarious suggestion, given the competition." (Kind of an amazing diss, if you ask me.)
Sounds great Liz! Whatever you say!
[Whispers] Let's ditch her and go to the movies.
Funny thing is, that whole RFK brain worm story made me think of the Futurama episode where Fry got brain worms that made him smart. Now I'm kind of curious if RFK's brain worm might have had a similar effect on him.
Sadly, it did not.
Fry got brain worms
Not that I would "other" sentient parasites, but they were intestinal worms.
I bow to your superior Futurama trivia knowledge. Truly, you are a man of culture.
*hangs head in shame*
Biden has had two brain anurisms. I'm surprised he can even function, strike that I don't think he does function
Biden is an excellent puppet. He's so life-like,
How the University of Southern California is trying to hold commencement festivities despite pro-Palestine protests.
Their only option is to drum up a new current thing real quick.
Drum up? Do you want another MAGA hat kid assaulting a proud Native person?
A record $11 trillion of home equity is 'tappable,' meaning homeowners can borrow against it while still maintaining at least 20% equity in the house...
I demand the government forgive my HELOC!
Do you know who else was tappable?
Sidney Sweeny?
Yo mama?
Everyone with dirt on Hillary?
(Maybe even double tappable)
Isn't it double tap to the chest and one to the head? Since Hillary has neither a heart nor a brain, this should not affect her.
Stormy D in 2006. Not so much now.
Certainly not E Jean Carroll, according to Trump.
Gene Kelly?
Shirley Temple?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3X4A9mI5bxw
I would expect SPB2 would give the same answer, but for different, sick reasons.
'Your vote probably doesn't matter: "The titanic Biden-Trump election likely will be decided by roughly 6% of voters in just six states," reports Axios. The truly contested states in 2024 will probably be Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—same as the 2020 battlegrounds—with a possibly contested seventh state, North Carolina. And, within those six states, both campaigns are calculating that it's really only about 6 percent of voters who are truly fence-sitters.'
Still time to pick up the kids and move.
Which is true only if the electorates in the other states vote as they are expected to do. So if they do not vote because their votes do not matter and it changes the result then the voters in those states who did vote will matter.
It is sort of true, but also not.
And that's why I vote LP. It matters but doesn't really is the LP in a nutshell.
Having Trump win the popular vote might do a good job of killng that popular vote compact.
They’d probably just kill themselves.
...he began experiencing severe brain fogginess and memory loss that doctors ultimately attributed to a dead parasite in Kennedy's brain, which the presidential candidate says may have eaten a portion of it (!).
That parasite? The DNC.
"That is a hilarious suggestion, given the competition."
God-DAMN.
Vote for me! I have 10% less brain damage!
Which is still 90% less brain damage than Joe Biden.
Emerson College posted bail for its arrested students, asked that charges not be pressed, committed to not disciplining them, and offered summer housing until their legal issues are resolved.
I'm sure there will be no negative consequences to this.
Not for the students, certainly.
*Adds Emerson College to list of colleges to never hire graduates from*
Optimus (who is the robot, not the child, to be clear)
Both being true wouldn't surprise me.
If anyone was going to name their kid Optimus it would be Elon Musk.
But it doesn't have an X in it.
X can be his middle name. Not an initial for, say, "Xavier." Just the letter X. As in Optimus X Musk.
What a prime name.
Kind of an amazing diss, if you ask me.
Hardly. While I am sure he had it teed up or tattooed on his hand, in no way did he answer the question asked. Are we sure there no lingering effects?
I identify as living in a reality where RFK Jr. is dead and we have a brain parasite running the best third party campaign since Gary Johnson's brain parasite forgot what Aleppo was.
Single brain-organism cognition is just an artificial social construct, like sex and gender. It's time people stopped othering and dead naming various parasites and symbiotes like brain slugs, the Trill, Babel fish, midi-chlorians, the Klyntar, and the Tok'ra.
Dork.
Yes, ideas!
I, for one, welcome our new brain worm overlords.
This week, porn star Stormy Daniels, whose tryst with Trump (and pocketing of hush money payments) is central to the criminal trial against Trump, took the stand.
Actually, Trump is being tried for *checks notes* "falsifying business records to cover up reimbursements for Mr. Cohen." The porn star has zero to do with the charges. His lawyers should never allowed her to be called as a 'witness' because she wasn't a witness to anything.
Well, who are you to judge? It’s not like she was a former FEC election law expert witness
What’s a show trial without a show?
A kangaroo court?
Did Stormy do it with a kangaroo? That’s disgusting.
Well, kangaroos do have two members instead of just one as we do.
So Joeys that want to be Jills have to get mutilated twice?
Sort of. It’s two heads and one shaft.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsupial#Male
And female kangaroos have two vaginas, apparently.
Does this mean female kangaroo stand-up comedians spend twice as much time telling unfunny jokes about their vaginas?
It's amusing the amount of time and expense the city of New York is willing to put into what is entirely two stacked misdemeanors. Even if you believe everything they're charging, the crime is putting the wrong label for a payment onto a business record. 6 week trial, high profile witnesses, massive security considerations. Plus they're having to hold extra courtrooms empty so the media can watch on a monitor because they refuse to just let Court TV or someone stream it.
Is the crime commensurate to the level of state expenditure even if you believe everything about the prosecutor's case?
The recent flood of newcomers has boosted the fortunes of NYC to the point where they can easily afford to indulge in such luxuries.
It is not amusing that the DA is using a gazillion NY tax dollars to influence the 2024 election.
Also based on the prosecutions theory, trump decided to pay more taxes to do so, benefitting the state.
You do know Trumps lawyers objected to her being a witness, Merchan told the prosecution they had guard rails, then the prosecution ignored those rails, then Merchan blamed Trump's team for not objecting more.
What an absolute shit show. And all that after saying that the FEC guy couldn’t be a witness?
It’s almost like Merchan wants this to get overturned.
The Dems don't care if it gets overturned on appeal. The point of all this is to generate negative headlines about Trump, drain his cash, and prevent him from campaigning. The biggest goal of the trial, though, is to get an automatic guilty verdict so that the media can spend every second calling Trump a "convicted felon" through the election.
I strongly suspect that they highly overestimate the negative effects and highly underestimate the negative reaction many will have toward the tone-deaf Democrats stuck in their bubble.
You're probably right. I still think there will be an effect (small, but could be enough to swing the election to Biden, if the fortifications don't do that already) on uneducated voters. A percentage of them will decide not to vote Trump if they hear enough times that he's a "convicted felon."
Seriously, if Liz is going to get her Trump news from the NYT she's doing not only her readers but herself a disservice. With a single sentence she reveals the fact that she has absolutely no fucking clue what she's writing about.
Does not seem to be anything the judge is listening to the defense in regards to.
'As for the sex itself, Daniels' testimony seemed to be tinged with trauma rhetoric, claiming that even though she never said no outright, there was a "power imbalance" and implied that it was something less than consensual. "I was staring up at the ceiling, wondering how I got there," she said on the stand.'
I wonder what the Biden girls would say.
Dad stop!
Damn, dude.
I'm almost ashamed at how hard I laughed at that. Almost.
Thread winner.
I suppose that might be a normal thought for a porn star in a moment of sobriety.
The on-camera gang bangs never allowed adequate time for reflection.
Not to mention they're rarely sober during gang bangs. I'm guessing the cocaine budget is why so many pron flicks are so low budget.
“Credibility Issues”. Someone buy the judge a mirror.
What makes you think he will cast a reflection?
Fact Check: Did Stormy Daniels Wear Mushroom Dress to Donald Trump's Trial?
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-stormy-daniels-wear-mushroom-dress-donald-trumps-trial-1893233
Too good to be true?
#Tinymushroomshaped
You have a strange phallic fascination with mushrooms. You might want to go get that checked out.
It has a thing for Hunter's dick pics as well.
Almost a fetish.
ME?
Republicans were holding up Hunter Biden dick pics in Congress for members to ogle.
You’re the one bringing it up here, so obviously you have a phallic fetish.
As an observer of politics.
I just wish the Senate had gotten to investigate Hunter Biden so I could have seen the two girly-boy Senators from South Carolina slobber over Hunter's dick pics.
You’re an observer of something, but it ain’t politics. It’s more like just dicks.
He's also an observer of the thing he linked to that got his original handle banned.
You obviously did not see the talk show where Stormy described Donnie's as "tiny mushroom shaped" and then chose a lookalike from a tray of sample mushrooms.
I think it was on Kimmel's show.
Did you short DJT last month like you wanted to? LOL
No. The 400% interest rate saved me.
Shorts began furiously covering at $22.
Meanwhile, Donny pocketed another 1.2 billion. LOL
He got $1.2 billion in locked up stock.
He could have paid his bail if he had gotten cash.
And you got nothing.
Quick google…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ji8i7Wy4mo
Skip to 8:50 for the mushrooms. The "I laid there and prayed for death" comment was funny.
Jimmy, after displaying the mushroom “Let’s put it back in there”
Stormy “No, please don’t say 'put it back in.'”
Kimmel and Adam Corolla were great on the Man Show. Stormy would have been a perfect guest for them.
Zicke Zacke Zicke Zacke Hoi Hoi Hoi!
Now those are ideas!
Have you and sarc ever considered joining MENSA?
You mean NAMBLA
Maybe they can all get a three for one deal there on membership with Jeffy.
Finally found a video sarc will watch and it is about Trumps dick.
Porn stars lack credibility, but are more credible than Jimmy Kimmel.
What about game show hosts who have declared bankruptcy a half a dozen times?
Ideas!, not people.
What percentage of his businesses went bankrupt?
Weird seeing a libertarian complain about natural economic actions.
Not a libertarian
Porn stars have more personal integrity and self worth than Jimmy Kimmel.
"In Biden's case, given the massive COVID-era spending—which Trump also had a hand in"
The actual COVID-related spending in 2020, yeah Trump had something to do with that. But the $6T or so that Biden admin ran up since then was nothing to do with Trump: American Rescue Plan $1.9T, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act $1.2T, Inflation Reduction Act $0.9T, Chips Act $300B, ...
Donnie = CARES Act was $2.1 trillion, PPP at $800 billion and Coronavirus Response Act $900 billion was more than Joe spent.
Infrastructure was a bill that lingered over - not really virus related.
Dude, Trump didn’t sign the CARES Act. Biden did. Just as Obama signed TARP. That’s the narrative now. Don’t you know anything? When facts conflict with the narrative, the facts are lies.
And just what party was in charge of the House in both cases?
Republicans have no history of fiscal integrity you idiot.
See the Bushpigs in 2003-2007 when they controlled the Senate, House and executive branch.
Same with 2017-2019.
Democrats suck too. You're the party lackey and you know it.
And you dodged the question instead of answering it.
They pretend that Republicans didn’t enthusiastically signed the legislation with much fanfare, and instead pretend that in both cases presidential vetoes were overridden by Democrats.
“Who signed the bills?”
“Democrats wrote them!”
“Ok, well that’s what Congress does. Who signed the bills?”
“Democrats had a veto-proof majority!”
“Ok, did the president veto the legislation?”
“Democrats wrote it!”
“Can you tell me who signed it?”
“Democrats wrote it! Democrats wrote it! Democrats wrote it! Democrats wrote it! You’re a Democrat! You support Democrats! Democrats wrote it! Democrats wrote it! Democraaaaaaaaaaaaaaats!"
I just find it amusing you and shrike can't figure out the role of Congress nor admit the role states played in shut downs.
If you look at moments of fiscal sanity, it's usually a republican controlled House.
It’s only ever been a Republican controlled House that has even hinted at fiscal responsibility in my 40+ years on earth.
It's astonishing that this has to be repeated nearly every single day.
Memory of a goldfish.
I wish I was astonished at how Trump’s Deranged Supporters have no idea that Congress' job is to write laws, that Trump did not veto this legislation, that Trump demanded his name on the checks, and that his only complaint was that the checks weren’t big enough. But I’m not astonished at all. That would require them having a grip on reality.
""and that his only complaint was that the checks weren’t big enough.""
So your saying Trump wanted to help people out during the pandemic more than Congress.
Worst Hitler ever.
I'm saying the idiots who refuse to acknowledge Trump's role are delusional.
Trump mishandled spending DURING the early phases of a pandemic that was being called an apocalypse. Biden wasted money AFTER the pandemic was shown to be a mild flu.
That goes against the narrative that Trump was forced into signing the bill by a veto-proof majority. You make it seem like he did it willingly. That's blasphemy in these parts.
But Joe is a well meaning old man with bad memory.
Anyone paying attention knew it wasn't an apocalypse by April 2020. Pretty much as soon as that cruise ship data came out and the first studies looking for antibodies were done.
Except everyone acknowledges his role while you dismiss the role of Congress.
The checks helped to enable the continuation of lockdowns, etc. If people had felt more pain from the idiotic policies, they would have demanded change.
The checks were described as "stimulus" which was absurd. The economy didn't need stimulus, it needed the boot off its neck.
Sarc, your acronym for TDS because youre upset you have actually TDS will never be a thing. Worse than attempting to make fetch happen.
Literally nobody here says he didn’t sign it, so no, it’s not “the narrative”. Goddamn man.
And per the usual leftist media, specific ambiguity, "wet roads cause rain" retcon, Trump laid out a bunch of money to combat a virus in the two weeks when even the highly-educated-but-still-exceedingly-stupid-and-even-more-dishonest portion of the population was convinced we were going to have walls of bodies 10 ft. high surrounding every hospital, while Biden, OTOH, laid out a bunch of money to fix the closures and disruptions caused by the highly-educated-but-still-exceedingly-stupid-and-even-more-dishonest people before he took office.
I'm still unvaccinated because I thought Trump was a dishonest moral idiot for laying out federal funds for the shot but, in the vein of actual, good faith "two weeks" and "amnesty", to act like Trump is every bit as guilty as Biden and/or the DNC is a far more dishonest and immoral false equivalence in a distinctly TDS fashion.
we were going to have walls of bodies 10 ft. high surrounding every hospital
And we didn't! Proof positive that two weeks slowed the spread!
No silly, it was the magical paper masks.
Considering that we learned just two weeks beforehand that borders are just imaginary social constructs and walls can be overcome by any Mexican with a ladder, I didn't see what the big deal was.
If it even happened, there wasn’t “power imbalance”. Trump was not her boos, employer, teacher, jailer, or any of the other situations that create “power imbalances”. She was porn star, he was a rich guy that she just met at a golf tournament schmooze event. She could’ve walked away instead of going back to his room. Allegedly.
Poor womenz in the porn industry have no agency , doncha know.
Poorwomenzin the porn industryhave no agency , doncha know.FTFY.
THIS IS WHAT PROGRESSIVES AND ESPECIALLY "POUNDMETOO" FEMINISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE
Including all the bog standard "Columbus proved the Earth was flat and the great warrior/leader Joan of Arc was executed for wearing men's clothes." useful idiots widens that circle considerably.
the only reason a porn star hangs out at any public function is to hook up for fame or fortune
Yep, same reason C-list actresses and Instathots go "yachting," in the hopes that they'll find some rich guy who will allow them to latch on--like what happened with Markle and Prince Harry.
People are increasingly choosing to live around others who share their values and beliefs, which has led to a homogenization of how communities vote.
White People culturally appropriating Chinatown and Little Italy and Greektowns ideas?
What about DiVeRsItY?
Sounds like they need 10,000 Haitians imported.
People are increasingly choosing to live around others who share their values and beliefs, which has led to a homogenization of how communities vote.
That isn't a problem, unless you view diversity as a requirement for a fulfilling life.
It's also destroys the argument against gerrymandering, because, as I've said before, it only works when people who live in a given area are already going to vote a specific way.
The fact that about 6% of the people will decide the Presidency is a feature of the partisan divide we face. We are divided into tribes and must vote our tribe no matter what. Look at the Republicans who feel Trump is awful but still feel they have to vote for him because of party loyalty. One could say the same for President Biden, but you don't hear the level of visceral disgust Republican express just before saying they will vote for Trump anyway.
Biden was the default Democrat in 2020. No one ever really liked him. But Bernie wasn't acceptable thus Sleepy Joe got the nod once all the other moderates dropped out.
Get real. Biden was selected by the DNC over Sanders and Gabbard as they could control him.
More likely selected by the CIA.
‘moderates’?? Who Dey in the Donkey klan?
According to plug - Warren, Bloomberg, Klobuchar, Harris, and Buttigeg apparently.
Don't have the cites at the moment but there were many elections in U.S. history where 6% or less of the voters in a state or handful of states made the difference.
Without a national vote winner take all system, it is inevitable this will happen not infrequently.
1960 Illinois, or should I say Crook County.
if states like California would apportion their electoral votes per the votes instead of winner take all, outcomes would be different.
Would that not be true if all states did this? Would that not be an election by popular vote. Be careful here because Democrats have won the popular vote every Presidential election since 1992 except for 2004.
Most states have a mix. A handful to winner of the state and the rest are proportionally awarded.
As far as I know, only two states, ME and NE, don't apportion all electoral votes to the state's popular vote winner.
Look at the Republicans who feel Trump is awful but still feel they have to vote for him because of party loyalty.
Which ones? [bites apple]
Are these the same partisan-or-die racists that supported Obama in unprecedented numbers and then turned around and voted for Trump over HRC? The same partisan-or-die minorities and immigrants (racist too no less) that polls indicate are turning towards Trump in numbers previously unseen?
It's not like Republicans have a catch phrase like "vote blue no matter who." Now THAT is blind team loyalty.
Vote red unless you’re dead? (then you’ll vote blue multiple times)
Bill Barr and Chris Sununu have both heavily criticized Trump and called for a different Republican nominee, and both have said they will vote for Trump in 2024.
Trump's reply on Truth or X to Barr's endorsement was priceless, though!
One could say the same for President Biden, but you don’t hear the level of visceral disgust Republican express just before saying they will vote for Trump anyway.
Biden voters aren’t allowed to voice their visceral disgust for Biden.
It's total bullshi, anyway, because his voters are saying he supports genocide at this very moment. This is just typical M4E misdirection in support of his leftist allies.
To the contrary. They are tasked with deflecting.
Biden's cognitive issues become Trump's conative issues talking points.
Are you saying you hear visceral disgust on the left before saying they will vote for Biden anyway?
Cite?
I don't believe you. I haven't seen or heard that anywhere.
There is visceral hate out there (especially places like Reddit) because he hasn’t nuked Israel yet, figuratively or literally. But they’ll still vote for him because “Trump is a Nazi”, said completely unironically.
"I was staring up at the ceiling, wondering how I got there," she said on the stand.
Pretty easy, whore--you agreed to get paid to have sex with a celebrity. Just like your real job, but not on camera.
The amusing part is that porn stars will often hook on the side to make extra money.
some people want to hook up with porn stars because they think they would be great in bed but it sounds like Stormy was a dead fish in the sack
Being on the cock while off the clock is a bad combo.
A good reason to hook up with a random porn star you meet at an event is because “they let you do it.” And she did. Predictable. Boring. Whore.
So are you all agreeing that Trump did commit adultery with Stormy, because he said it never happened.
Who fucking cares? I wasn't there, so I have no idea what happened. And I'm not interested in finding out.
I'm mocking her emotive testimony. What your side believes is immaterial.
Stop pretending that you're debating evangelicals. These are either libertarians, pragmatists, or loyalists. None of which care that he definitely fucked that nasty whore.
I don't really care if he did or didn't. I do find it funny that you're all upset about him doing so. Why do you care?
Also, you comment that Trump said he didn't, in order to impugn his honesty (which, like most politicians, he doesn't have much of), but don't seem to care that Stormy herself claimed, in 2018, that she never had sex with him. This was after years of claiming she did, and before again claiming she did after she said she didn't.
Was she lying then, or lying now ?
Yes
"So are you all agreeing that Trump did commit adultery with Stormy"
Chemjeff tries to do this here too. Concern troll like this place is Christianity Today; "A thrice-divorced billionaire politician might have committed adultery, you should be outraged."
That little kid in the picture is meeting his future boss.
People that argue against doing away with the Electoral College usually express fear that a popular vote for President would just mean 'big states' or 'big cities' would dominate. (They really worry about how heavily Democrat urban areas are, rather than caring so much about geography.)
But we really should think about how we ended up with the current sorting of urban vs. rural being blue vs. red. The GOP base shifted to the South and rural areas outside of the South because of the ability to gerrymander legislative districts to enhance the voting power of rural areas and because of the Electoral Votes of states being winner-take-all. (Except for Nebraska and Maine.) It is better to have your voters spread out in more districts and states where they can reliably win by 5-10% than to have them concentrated in fewer districts and states that they can win by 20% or more.
It is easier to obtain an Electoral College majority, Senate majority, and House majority if your voters are geographically spread out in suburbs, exurbs, and rural areas than when they are concentrated heavily in cities. Republican strategists all the way back to the Nixon era and especially through the Reagan era and into the 90s figured out that appealing to the social/religious conservatives outside of the big cities was a quicker path to getting a majority where it mattered - in Congress, state legislatures, and the Electoral College. That is why the GOP Presidential nominee has gotten more votes than the Democrat only once since 1988. Think about that. There are people that are old enough to be the President that have only had the Republican pull in more votes than the Democrat once during their lifetime.
It is fundamentally against the idea of representative government for some voters to have more influence than others with their votes. "One man, one vote" wasn't the law of the land until Reynolds v. Sims, decided in 1964. SCOTUS in that case ruled that legislative districts (for states as well as for the House) had to be roughly equal in population, or else it would violate Equal Protection. The equal representation of states in the Senate, and extra 2 electoral votes each state gets regardless of population means that some voters will always count more in the federal government than others. I can only think that people would think this to be a good plan if it is their vote counting for more or their party getting the advantage.
Without the equal representation of the Senate, the Electoral College, and gerrymandering, there is no reason why the partisan divide would be so dramatically aligned according to urban vs. rural residency. There would be no reason for the Presidential election to come down to such a small slice of the country's voters. In fact, there would be less of a reason for there to be as strong of a partisan divide. If people didn't live in communities so cleanly divided by party, they would know more people with different political views. They would be friends with, work with, go to church with, more people with different political views. Such people might actually be interested in trying to persuade each other or even in changing their minds than in battling a hated enemy come Election Day.
It is fundamentally against the idea of representative government for some voters to have more influence than others with their votes.
I hear this line a lot, and it’s complete bullshit spouted by sour grapes leftists who are pissed that they can’t cram their agenda down the entire nation’s throat. Wyoming does not have more influence with their votes than California, no matter what people try to claim. The only metric that matters is 3 < 54. If these people had managed to turn Texas blue in the last 20 years, this complaint would never be asserted.
If people didn’t live in communities so cleanly divided by party, they would know more people with different political views.
You mean like Michelle Koskinski and her fretting after she found out that she lived in the same community as people who didn’t share the same political ideology as her?
They would be friends with, work with, go to church with, more people with different political views. Such people might actually be interested in trying to persuade each other or even in changing their minds than in battling a hated enemy come Election Day.
Ah, yes, the neo-Maoist “unity-criticism-unity” tactic at play again.
If people would only do what they were supposed to do, the government wouldn’t have to force them
/ an actual jeffy statement.
The funny thing being, Republicans tend to live in areas that are politically heterodox, with relatively small GOP majorities. Democrats more tend to clump into extreme one party dominant areas. There is very little gerrymandering actually required if districts follow local community borders. It actually requires gerrymandering to make urban areas even somewhat heterodox.
There is a good deal of gerrymandering required to create majority-minority districts, which the Left had been insisting upon, which also tends to concentrate Democrat voters.
What you are leaving out is that the states were (and in theory still sort of are) sovereign entities who entered into a federation on the conditions that each state still got to have significant influence. That's why the Senate and EC are as they are (and the Senate only half way since the 17th amendment). If you want more democracy, shrink the federal government and return more power and control to the states.
I’d love to know how many voters would actually switch between R and D vs how many plan to vote but could be discouraged vs how many don’t plan to vote but could be encouraged vs will definitely vote but have to be sweet talked into not voting for green or libertarian.
Which of these scenarios is 6% covering?
I used to be the last category, but the trump enthusiasts have thoroughly discouraged me since my trump 2020 vote and I am now a non voter that could not be persuaded to vote.
Edit: fuck you faggot.
That's about where I'm at. Though I gave up on voting before 2020 (being off the voter rolls is great, I don't get constant mailers and phone calls in election years anymore).
I could be totally wrong, but my guess is that swing voters that would actually switch between R and D are either crazy or are among those lucky people who actually don't care about politics at all and don't give it much thought.
I think that a casual look at the candidates reveals that voters don't think much about politics.
"but the trump enthusiasts have thoroughly discouraged me since my trump 2020 vote and I am now a non voter that could not be persuaded to vote."
If you find a bunch of loudmouth hillbillies and their car-salesman candidate are too declassee to vote for, you deserve another Biden term.
SIL sent me this. Says it was meant as satire, but seems to be a documentary now.
"You know...For Palestine.."
https://twitter.com/askdani__real/status/1787484353057960161?s=46
Maricopa county board of supervisors is out on the field, stretching and practicing so they're ready for the big game in November. They've had 2 wins and are going for a third.
“It’s going to be a very tight race, decided by a very small handful of voters.”
This is just silly! I couldn’t find any evidence from any of the last dozen Presidential elections that the outcome did not hinge on a few thousand votes in a few key districts in a few key states. Your vote doesn’t count for much more important reasons than that: it doesn’t count because during every Presidential election at least 45% of the eligible voters are faced with a choice between a Democrat and a Republican nominee who have a chance to win; third party candidates who have NO chance to win; and staying home and throwing your vote away.
"a terribly inappropriate soundbite coming from our esteemed governor"
Taking into account the possibility that this is a sarcastic expression ... NO one could possibly "esteem" Hochul on any terms! The people who elected her do not have the tools to esteem anyone; and the rest of us certainly know better.
It never even crossed my mind that it wasn't sarcasm.
But I think you underestimate people's depravity with NO one could possibly “esteem” Hochul on any terms!
I disagree. I think that Hochul would make a fine scarecrow.
So you, like, "esteem" scarecrows?
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump had a brainworm too. He is literally so impulsive that the judge in his court case had to threaten to jail him to stop him from interrupting the proceedings. Even if he's innocent and the case is BS, which is likely at least partially true, that isn't a justification. Most innocent people maintain enough composure in the courtroom to avoid being held in contempt even once. Forget about whether Trump committed a felony or not, that level of impulsivity shows he is simply unfit for office.