Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Israel

Chaos in Rafah

Plus: Airbnb ban has predictable consequences, AI nudify app, the death of swagger, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 5.7.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Palestinians in Gaza | Omar Ashtawy/APAImages / Polaris/Newscom
(Omar Ashtawy/APAImages / Polaris/Newscom)

Going into Rafah: "The Israeli military said on Tuesday that it had sent tanks into Rafah and established control over the Gaza side of the border crossing with Egypt, in what it called a limited operation aimed at destroying Hamas targets it says were used to attack Israeli soldiers," reports The New York Times. 

The day prior, Israeli authorities had warned Palestinians sheltering in Rafah to move elsewhere, saying an invasion was imminent after Hamas had launched rockets from Rafah that killed four Israeli soldiers. "A sense of panic coursed through Rafah, in southern Gaza, on Monday after Israel issued an evacuation order for parts of the city, which has become home to more than a million Palestinians seeking refuge from seven months of war," reports the Times.

"People dismantled their tents in the pouring rain. Prices for fuel and food skyrocketed. And some weighed the potential risk of staying against the dangers of travel through a war zone."

30 for 1: Right before the invasion started, Hamas claims it agreed to a ceasefire, which was brokered by Egypt and Qatar. But an Israeli official claims that the ceasefire agreed to by Hamas did not include terms that Israel had also agreed to. One major sticking point: "Israel insists on a temporary cease-fire, saying it will keep fighting afterward with the eventual aim of toppling Hamas's rule in Gaza," reports the Times. "Hamas demands a permanent cease-fire and vows to remain in power there."

There are also important basics missing from the ceasefire agreement. "The proposed agreement would also ensure the release of Israeli captives in Gaza as well as an unspecified number of Palestinians held in Israeli jails," reports Al Jazeera. Throughout the proposed deal, Hamas wants a massively imbalanced number of prisoners released back to Gaza. For example: "Hamas shall release all living Israeli captives, including civilian women and children (under the age of 19 who are not soldiers). In return, Israel shall release 30 children and women for every Israeli detainee released, based on lists provided by Hamas, in order of detention." (Emphasis mine.)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that negotiations can continue, but that the ceasefire agreed to by Hamas is "far from Israel's basic requirements." The ground offensive in Rafah is less extensive than the Israeli military had initially advertised. Hamas still called it a "dangerous escalation."

Trump is down: Former President Donald Trump has been threatened by the judge presiding over his criminal hush-money trial with jail time if he violates a gag order that was put in place. But Trump wouldn't necessarily mind jail too much, he claims.

"Frankly our Constitution is much more important than jail," Trump said to the press assembled in the courthouse, per Politico. "It's not even close. I'll do that sacrifice any day."

The gag order means Trump can't comment on witnesses and jurors; he already violated the gag order and received $10,000 in fines (add it to his tab). Now, Trump—who believes the New York case is quite a legal stretch (which isn't totally off base, as Jacob Sullum writes)—and a nasty form of political persecution (again, not totally wrong), seems pretty fine with being the martyr.

"The liberal judge in New York just threatened to THROW ME IN JAIL," Team Trump wrote in a fundraising email. "They want me in HANDCUFFS."


Scenes from New York: As I previously reported, Airbnb was essentially banned in the city (and the city has contracted with lower-priced hotels to serve as migrant shelters, at taxpayers' expense). Look what happened to hotel prices (I believe the poster filtered for Marriott):

this is lunacy pic.twitter.com/WdgyUIAeHi

— Phillip Jackson (@philwinkle) May 6, 2024

For more background on NYC and Airbnb:

Let's do a quick dissection of New York City's incredibly shortsighted, frankly quite stupid new Airbnb regulations which punish hosts, travelers, and the platform itself.

— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) September 6, 2023


QUICK HITS

  • Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) just announced that he is running for reelection. Note that he is 82 years old, so if he gets elected this time around, he may be serving until he's 88.
  • About 10 years ago, NASA gave Boeing $4.2 billion to work on a "commercial crew" transportation system; SpaceX got $2.6 billion. "With Boeing's Starliner spacecraft finally due to take flight this week with astronauts on board, we know the extent of the loss, both in time and money," reports Ars Technica. "[SpaceX's] Crew Dragon vehicle has flown thirteen public and private missions to orbit. Because of this success, Dragon will end up flying 14 operational missions to the station for NASA, earning a tidy fee each time, compared to just six for Starliner. Through last year, Boeing has taken $1.5 billion in charges due to delays and overruns with its spacecraft development."
  • This feels like the darkest future:

New from 404 Media: Pornhub's top adult content creator is promoting an AI nonconsensual 'nudify' app. Pornhub told us product placement is allowed if the creator indicates the video is sponsored (we didn't see such a label). https://t.co/zxtHtgaHyW

— Joseph Cox (@josephfcox) May 6, 2024

  • "Millennials and Gen Z have been bred like human veal by their Boomer and Gen X parents who made sure their kids were constantly being surveilled and optimized for success in SATs, sports and entry into the Establishment pipeline," Reason's Nick Gillespie told Politico's Jack Shafer for a piece on whether the media industry is losing its swagger. "Can we be surprised that such a system has produced generations of journalists who endlessly describe anything they disagree with as misinformation and want to control and regulate everything like the room temperature in an after-school enrichment program?"
  • Stunning press dishonesty:

Compare the Kahn quote to how Froomkin summarizes it https://t.co/xzNIn0FxZb

— Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) May 6, 2024

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Rent Free Q&A: Bryan Caplan on Build, Baby, Build

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

IsraelPalestineWarMiddle EastNew York CityNew YorkAirBnbDonald TrumpPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (464)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The Israeli military said on Tuesday that it had sent tanks into Rafah...

    All because the NYPD took down those tent cities.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      From the Rafah to the sea……

    2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      Now Israel can proceed to crush and utterly defeat Hamas. In order for an enduring peace to occur, Hamas must be seen as crushed and utterly defeated within the arab world.

      My only complaint is that Israel needs to kill more Hamas members faster.

      1. Anomalous   1 year ago

        Hamas delenda est.

      2. B G   1 year ago

        The biggest problem that Israel has in that regard is that it might not be possible to really take down Hamas without hitting Tehran, which is something that even Joe Biden might notice if it were to happen.

        It would be interesting to see how the Arab world would react if someone could actually take down the theocracy in Iran without destroying the secular and functional parts of the government.

        1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          Israel absolutely will be hitting Tehran.

          1. B G   1 year ago

            As long as the theocracy is in power there, some kind of confrontation with the west seems nearly inevitable.

            The problem for at least 20 years now is that the general population there probably isn't interested in fighting for the mullahs but are facing enough loyal "revolutionary guards" to have to take that stand at gunpoint. They'd also probably be more willing to fight Israelis than Americans but that would require us to put bodies in harm's way on purpose.

            Best case could be something like "Gulf War 1" but maybe with a more hopeful aftermath, if we were to leave the place in the hands of the secular government (which should get more secular quickly if the remaining regime doesn't keep up with the theocracy's policy of disqualifying candidates who are viewed as "too moderate"), assuming we could leave it mostly intact.

            Worst case would be to do something like what Obama did to Libya, destroying the entire authority structure from high altitude without any intention of restoring order.

    3. Bill Falcon   1 year ago

      Boeing and ULA (which includes the MIC biggest grifter Lockmart) scrubbed the launch of Starliner. If Congress wasn't bought off by the MIC, the Feds would sue Boeing for the $4B..7 years late? Is the Atlas rocket even safe (it hasn't been used to launch a man in space since it's earlier version in 1963 for the last flight of the Mercury program!

      1. B G   1 year ago

        As far as I know, a large portion of the people left in the aerospace industry who have prior experience with human space flight are at ULA.

        The thing that would worry me the most about being an astronaut on the ULA launch vehicle would be that LMT has a strong hand in that organization as well.

        Any launch that's scrubbed in that situation would be due to some safety concern (the last time the suits pushed up hard and forced engineers to give a buy-in on a questionable situation was also the last time the Shuttle Challenger lifted off from KSC).

        I'd personally be more afraid to fly on the SpaceX vehicle that NASA has chosen to go with for the bulk of its upcoming human launches. They probably don't tell the astronauts riding up in the Dragon capsule that one of the ways that Elon's company saves money is to not hire engineers with any significant experience. That's a drop in the ocean compared to the cost reduction that SpaceX gets by not having to build its vehicles to some government spec (which usually includes specifying the use of LH2 propellant rather than the Kerosene that SpaceX uses in order to reduce the "environmental impact" of each launch).

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The day prior, Israeli authorities had warned Palestinians sheltering in Rafah to move elsewhere...

    "Go be human shields somewhere else."

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      A genocide.
      Remember when the Nazis warned Auschwitz prisoners to leave?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Waiting for both Misek and Miscontrueman to comment.

        1. B G   1 year ago

          Misek probably thinks he has a notarized copy of the memo that Herr Commandant posted on the bulletin board in the rec room for the "honored guests" at the Auschwitz Resort and Spa.

          The problem is that all those Jews were so greedy they couldn't walk away from the complementary massage and aromatherapy treatments they had booked later that day so they were still there when the cosmic wormhole opened up and they all got quantum tunneled to some beach in the Carribean where nobody thought that the sudden appearance of 10 million people (who definitely weren't killed at the camps, despite never having been seen alive again anywhere else ever again) was noteworthy

  3. Randy Sax   1 year ago

    Is it sad that I recognized the girl in the porn tweet before I read the caption?

    1. R Mac   1 year ago

      Ginger porn? I don’t know if sad is the word I’d use.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Pornhub? What's that?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Nice try.

    3. Beezard   1 year ago

      It took me a sec, but I’m used to seeing her with elf ears or in a little red riding hood outfit or some shit. …I mean that time autocorrect accidentally typed “Sweetie Fox” in the search engine instead of “sweet and sour sauce recipe. This damned buggy Autocorrect.

  4. JesseAz   1 year ago

    #ChemJeff Files.

    chemjeff
    @chemjeff
    Hey! Chunky style milk is my idea! And I have former college roommates who can vouch for ne!

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Are you stalking creamjeff? Are you going to dox him?
      Asking for paranoid jeff

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      HOW DARE YOU!

    3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      STALKER!!!
      It's stalking to repost someone's tweets here. Just ask sarcasmic.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        It is amazing how many dems he was retreating. Even fucking Katie Hill. But not a Democrat.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I mean, seriously, no libertarian, much less a conservative, retweets fucking Sulu and his nonsense.

          1. Pepin the short   1 year ago

            Unsurprising but hilarious. George Takei.

    4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      I love the sight of cyberstalking in the morning.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Not like I signed up to Truth Social to stalk him.

  5. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    'nudify' app.

    If you don’t know what tits look like by now, you have problems that can’t be solved.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      "If you've seen one, you want to see them all." -my grandma

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Finally, those Xray glasses I bought when I was 10 will work!

      1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

        Pffft. Let me know when your sea monkeys build a castle.

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          South Park did it, South Park did it.

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Imagine the existential dread of people, especially people of the opposite sex, being able to see you naked anywhere, any time, and simply not wanting to. The horror!

    4. Super Scary   1 year ago

      I can't define them, but I know them when I see them.

  6. JesseAz   1 year ago

    More and more deep blue areas are protesting thr costs of illegal immigration.

    https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/hundreds-protest-massachusetts-illegal-immigration-policies

    The protest comes after Democratic Gov. Maura Healey signed a bill earlier in the week that sets a nine-month limit on how long families can live in the state's emergency shelters while also approving a plan that would bring total shelter system spending to $826 million for the current fiscal year.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Are they talking about border walls yet?

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        The amazing thing about leftists is they can hold two different contradictory beliefs. So border security is still racist.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Musta learned how to do that at some elite college.

        2. Ajsloss   1 year ago

          The amazing thing about leftists is they can hold two different contradictory beliefs.

          I believe Orwell called it doublethink.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Orwell also intended 1984 to be a warning, not a guidebook.

        3. Incunabulum   1 year ago

          Border wall at Mexico is racist.

          Border wall around my gated community is fine.

      2. B G   1 year ago

        If they are, it'll be to wall off TX, FL, and AZ to keep the immigration contained within the border states.

        California is about the only blue state where the presence of illegal immigrants isn't seen as a problem; it's been unavoidable for longer than anyone can remember and the local economy in L.A. probably couldn't function if half the workers in the service sector were actually US citizens.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      They wanted to virtue signal and be sanctuary cities, counties, and states. Now they’re bitching that they actually have to live up to their promises and not just virtue signal so they can look righteous in the eyes of the Woke elite priesthood.

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      I mean, 12 bucks for 3 tacos? Rip off!

    4. Bill Falcon   1 year ago

      Gaza is about 40% bigger in land mass than Martha's Vinyard. 3M folks live in Gaza...so at least 1M illegals can live on MV right? What a racist the Mass gov is..welcome all immigrants Mass. Heck at least a few thousand can live on the Obama compound or the Jamie Diamond or Bill Ackerman's compound.

  7. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    Hamas still called it a "dangerous escalation."

    It's hard to escalate from murder, rape, and pillaging on unarmed civilians.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      It's a paraphrase of the woody Allen line, tragedy is when hamas stubs their toe, it's comedy when they rape Jewish children

      1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        There are more attractive children to rape.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      If this is a “dangerous escalation”, then what the fuck was October 7?

      1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        A measured response to colonial oppression. /Columbia campers

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      I can think of a few ways to escalate from there, but logistics would probably be an issue. And where would we even get 10 Godzillas?

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        "And where would we even get 10 Godzillas?"

        Central casting?
        A.I.?
        CGI?
        Any left wing committee?

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Chris Christie and Prtizker with a cameo by lizzo is about 12.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            They raised the Richter Scale?

      2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        The BET Hip Hop Awards?

  8. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    n return, Israel shall release 30 children and women for every Israeli detainee released, based on lists provided by Hamas, in order of detention.”

    I’m getting the feeling that Hamas thinks Palestinian lives are worth less than Israeli lives.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      At least go for three fifths?

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        Cut off a leg and an arm before release?

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      I thought those people were better at bargaining.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        They like to haggle.

        1. Ska   1 year ago

          Negotiating with Israelis - set asking price at 190% of what you want, settle at 90-100% of what you want. If you can.

  9. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

    “Millennials and Gen Z have been bred like human veal by their Boomer and Gen X parents who made sure their kids were constantly being surveilled and optimized for success in SATs, sports and entry into the Establishment pipeline,” Reason’s Nick Gillespie

    Can we at least get a “Some” at the beginning of this bullshit line?

    1. Zeb   1 year ago

      People really love overgeneralizing about generational cohorts.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Including beltway libertarians. Which should tell you something.

      2. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        People really love overgeneralizing about generational cohorts.

        Sounds like what every opponent of Gillespie's leather jacket would say.

      3. Rocinante   1 year ago

        I hate it when everyone generalizes all the time.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Who doesn’t?

        2. Anomalous   1 year ago

          Generalizations are always wrong.

      4. ducksalad   1 year ago

        Some people really love overgeneralizing, Mr. Veal Boy.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          Mr. Veal Boy?

    2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      How 'bout a "Most"?

  10. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Its not just Trump Merchan doesn’t want to hear speak. Merchan has disallowed former FEC commissioner from discussing how they choose if expenses are personal or campaign related.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/2993414/when-the-judge-gags-a-key-witness-for-trumps-defense/

    The Trump defense plans to call Smith as a witness. Not because he has any personal knowledge of the Trump transaction but because he understands, and has enforced, the campaign law that Bragg’s prosecutors appear to be planning to use against Trump. But Merchan has forbidden Smith from testifying about most of the issues involved in the case.
    .
    Among the things Smith might be able to testify about is the novelty of the current Trump prosecution. Merchan will not allow it. “Defendant seeks to elicit from Smith, among other things, that at the time Cohen paid Daniels, there had never been a case in which anyone had been convicted of a federal campaign finance law violation for the making of ‘hush money payments,’” Merchan wrote. Smith might also be asked about “the facts surrounding the trial of former U.S. Senator and presidential candidate John Edwards, his subsequent acquittal, and that the case was heavily criticized.” Merchan will not allow it.
    .
    Other things Smith might be able to testify about are the FEC’s decision to dismiss a complaint against Trump for this very matter and the Justice Department’s decision not to prosecute Trump for the same set of actions. But Merchan said Smith cannot say a word about those matters. “That the FEC dismissed the complaint against defendant and the DOJ decided against prosecuting defendant for potential FECA violations are probative of nothing,” Merchan wrote on March 18. “These matters are therefore irrelevant and defendant is precluded from eliciting testimony or introducing evidence or both.”

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Kangaroo court show trial.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Kangaroo with Carmen Miranda fruit salad head gear. And a banana in its pocket.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      Well just look at Trump playing the victim.

      — Jeffsarc

    3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      If Merchan and Engoron don't end up in jail after all this then there is no justice.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Ironically they have the Qualified Immunity Jack Smith and Biden are stripping from Trump.

      2. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

        I would accept swinging from a lamppost as well.

    4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      This is enough to make Joseph Stalin blush, even from the grave.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        The new normal is to have the judge disallow all evidence that helps the defense.

        1. HorseConch   1 year ago

          Look at how hard they have been pushing the narrative that he's a monster because he's been indicted for a shitload of charges. No innocent until proven guilty if you are accused of bullshit.

        2. Incunabulum   1 year ago

          Honestly, that's pretty normal for judges.

          If you get to court and you have the right skin color you're just going to be let go. If you have the wrong one you're going to jail no matter what.

        3. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          Allowing defendants to present evidence is white supremacy.

    5. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      Judge Merchan will soon move to put POTUS Trump in jail for contempt. Just watch.

    6. Anomalous   1 year ago

      Kafka would be shaking his head saying what the fuck.

    7. DesigNate   1 year ago

      I’d be tempted to say something about (redacted), but we all know that New York (redacted) and (redacted) are thin skinned vile fucks who wouldn’t hesitate to come after me.

    8. B G   1 year ago

      Is there any chance that the judge is trying to taint the case intentionally to guarantee the appeal because he has a strong suspicion that at least half of the jurors lied about being able to consider the evidence in an impartial manner?

      It's got to be a fairly low probability to pick 12 random people off the street in Manhattan and end up with one of them not hating trump.

  11. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

    Hamas wrote a one sided agreement then called it a cease fire.

    It's funny you would think if the goal was genocide Isreal wouldn't be warning people to leave.

    1. BigT   1 year ago

      You can tell how much they value their own people when they offered to trade one Jewish hostage for every THIRTY Palestinians.

      1. B G   1 year ago

        Returning hostages is no major sacrifice for Hamas. When they're re-armed and ready to re-initiate hostilities, they'll just go take some more since the ICC (and UN Human Rights Commission) only considers war crimes to be wrong if they're committed by Israel, and they know that they'll face little to no international criticism (and many on the western left will even excuse behavior that they claim to consider beyond the pale)

        Aggression against Israel gets some kind of a pass from the crowd who's pretending to be outraged over what they've been working for decades to be able to call a "genocide". Possibly because it's coming from groups with a history of deliberately and frequently committing violence against civilians, and the left's solution to "reduce terrorism" is to capitulate pre-emptively and spare the terrorists the need to even make a threat (not comprehending that they're still coming, they'll just then ask for more).

  12. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Chaos in Rafa, sky-high rents in Manhattan, AI titties on your phone, and whiny young people in elitist enclaves.

    Meanwhile, 99% of people in 99% of America go on with their lives, feeling relatively happy and productive. What would the news (and narratives) look like if we ignored all the special people?

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Meanwhile, 99% of people in 99% of America go on with their lives

      Except for the 99% that died with/from covid. Seen any death counters on the news lately?

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "Meanwhile, 99% of people in 99% of America go on with their lives, feeling relatively happy and productive."

      Or they would if inflation wasn't killing them, and Disney and the Department of Education would stop trying to castrate their kids.

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        Those are bigger issues, but the retards in charge don't seem to grasp it while howling about how great things are.

  13. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Economy is so great under Biden banks are near the tipping point of failing.

    According to recent reports, hundreds of banks face the potential of failing just like Republic First Bancorp.
    .
    Consulting firm Klaros Group analyzed roughly 4,000 U.S. banks and found that the banks face a threat of losses due to "secular changes in social patterns accelerated by the COVID pandemic (such as work-from-home, which has materially impacted demand for office space) and to the impacts of higher interest rates and related inflation."

    https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/finance/wkd-bidenomics-tips-more-stressed-us-banks-warning-zone-economy-slows

  14. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

    It's all shrimp and grits. Get over it.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Does anyone have any idea wtf she meant?

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

        It's a popular dish.

        Unlike her.

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

        What I find hilarious is that it was an answer to a question about what some people who belong to her party are calling genocide.

        Genocide?
        Shrimp and Grits!

      3. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

        I thought this shit was fucking hilarious. Harris is walking out of a restaurant with a bag of food and a dude asks about Hamas.

        It was a "gotcha" question and she knew it.

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

          ""“Madam Vice President, Hamas says it accepted—,” a reporter began as Harris exited Joe Louis Southern Kitchen in Detroit, Mich.

          “Shrimp and grits,” Harris, 59, interjected with a grin as she pointed to her bag. “You wanted to know.”""

          A question about a proposed ceasefire is a very valid question to someone who may become president.

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            A question about a proposed ceasefire is a very valid question to someone who may become president.

            It's not the question, it's the situation. If she would've ignored the question entirely, nobody would care. She said something snarky, and it's a national crisis.

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              She said something snarky unserious and stupid, and it’s a national crisis.

            2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

              I was responding to you flagging the question as a "gotcha" question.

              People on the campaign trail will get asked questions wherever they are. Nothing wrong with the venue, nothing wrong with the question. If you don't like being asked questions about current world affairs, especially those affecting domestic issues, get out of politics

              1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

                I forget who the politician was, but he was asked a question about *insert issue here* in public, and he randomly answered "The Lakers in 6"; referring to the NBA finals at the time.

                I get it, you don't agree, but telling the press to fuck off is hysterical.

          2. Zeb   1 year ago

            Yeah, but she knows that there is no answer she can give that will be to her advantage.

      4. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        She should have acted like the Chicago mayor and run away

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Never in my life have I ever seen a Chicago mayor run so fast from the press. Even Lightfoot would’ve stayed and answered questions.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Frankly our Constitution is much more important than jail...

    I don't know how much more of a martyr they can set him up to be.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Death penalty?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Room 101?

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      I mean they are already discussing the Kennedy solution.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Publicly. The FBI didn't have as big of balls back in '63 and '68.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I fear that if they went with that solution, they might just trigger a civil war. Of course, it seems the progressives want that with their current posturing. They need to keep in mind that they need to be careful of what they wish for. They might just get it, and not how they wanted it.

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            The progs think the military and all of the gov't agents will side with them.

            Progs - "We have nukes, tanks, and F-16's. Do you really think your AR-15 matters?"

            Us - "We know where you live."

            1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

              Do you really think your AR-15 matters?

              Us: Obviously, my AR-15 fell off the boat that one time, but if it doesn't matter, why are you trying to take it from me?

              1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

                Progs have terminal cognitive dissonance.

            2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

              The progs think the military and all of the gov’t agents will side with them.

              Most of them would. Soldiers and cops want to be on the winning side when the music stops.

              1. BigT   1 year ago

                Whatever side the military supported would ‘win’ but the right is much better prepared for the decade of guerrilla warfare that follows.

      2. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Leading to the implementation of the final solution.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Does this mean we have to start the Final Countdown?

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            If you include Musk in the basket of deplorables, it's not inconceivable they could make it to Venus.

        2. Zeb   1 year ago

          I've always wanted to start a flooring installation business called "The Vinyl Solution".

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            Great name for a high end turntable.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Look what happened to hotel prices...

    Government-enforced lack of competition can't possibly explain this!

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      I'm just glad we now have proof that importing and subsidizing millions of illegal immigrants has no effect on markets.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        What about the food truck market?

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Have yet to see food truck prices come down.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            According to Lizzie Warren, that means the food truck operators are just greedy bastards.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              How did they form evil corporations so quickly?

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                Help from tax funded NGOs?

  17. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    Scenes from New York:

    They always try to paint themselves as anti-racists, inclusive, etc. But in truth they are often low-life racists, who backpedal when the mask slips...

    ‘I Misspoke’: NY Gov. Kathy Hochul Apologizes After Claiming ‘Black Kids’ in the Bronx ‘Don’t Even Know What the Word Computer Is’

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      Imagine if Trump said that. I doubt any dem would have labeled it as "misspoke".

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Trump is too busy invoking Hitler by saying Gestapo.

        https://apnews.com/article/trump-gestapo-biden-nazi-germany-campaign-rhetoric-531691ce92cafc18c810c75740802883

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          It gets better:

          Trump’s unfounded comparison to Nazi-era tactics comes as he denies and tries to deflect from the charges against him — most notably his effort to overturn Biden’s 2020 victory, before a mob of Trump supporters attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

          1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

            It is really out of bounds to compare a sitting President's administration to the Nazi regime*.

            *Unless it is a Democrat and the President is a Republican.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          "He's invoking fascism by complaining about it"

      2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        But Hochul means well
        *eyeroll*

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      Here’s the video:

      https://twitter.com/GOP_is_Gutless/status/1787827675135967276

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        The great white saviors will lead the darkies forward.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      That's OK. Hochul doesn't know what a Becky is.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      In a similar vein:

      Democrat Representative Said “Women Can’t Have Guns Because Safeties Are Too Complicated”

      In a recent debate over Safe Storage laws, a Democratic State Legislature member from Minnesota, Rep. Kaohly Vang Her (DFL), made a statement that has sparked controversy and disbelief among many. Her assertion that women should not have firearms because they might struggle with operating the safeties has ignited a fierce debate about gender stereotypes, firearms competency, and individual rights.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Note that he is 82 years old, so if he gets elected this time around, he may be serving until he's 88.

    To be fair, a Democratic Socialist isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer regardless of age.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      But Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson says "I Agree With 73% of What Bernie Sanders Says".

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Aleppo.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Careful now, square/ circle will get mad at you for that.

  19. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    "Monday after Israel issued an evacuation order for parts of the city,"

    I would think that if one were genociding a people, giving them warning to evacuate before you kill them is a poor strategy.

    WORST. GENOCIDE. EVER.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Is it because they are trying to do it on the cheap?

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The best yesterday was the left and media declaring Israel was forcing northern Gaza into famine and starvation after Hamas blew up the gates Israel was using to deliver food.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        "They made me do it!"

        1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

          Sounds like the classic child/wife abuser = they made me do it

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Funny you should compare Hamas to child and wife abusers.

  20. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    "People dismantled their tents in the pouring rain. Prices for fuel and food skyrocketed. And some weighed the potential risk of staying against the dangers of travel through a war zone."

    And that's the news today from Columbia University.

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      And that’s the news today from Columbia University.

      Genuine LOL. Thanks.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      Ha

  21. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...Dragon will end up flying 14 operational missions to the station for NASA, earning a tidy fee each time, compared to just six for Starliner.

    I think I'd skip those six flights anyway.

    1. R Mac   1 year ago

      We’ve reached the point you should probably keep any criticism of Boeing to yourself.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        12 new whistleblowers are now on suicide or random health problems watch.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        You might accidentally shoot yourself in the back of the head. Twice.

        1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          Dangerous alt-right MAGAs eating bananas lead to that awful slipping accident. Our thoughts and prayers.

      3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        I didn’t realize that the Clintons were invested in Boeing until whistleblowers started dropping like flies.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      You never know when a door plug might just blow open into space.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      "Out of an abundance of caution," Boeing says its historic Starliner launch has been postponed, citing an issue with the oxygen relief valve on the Atlas V rocket's upper stage. It was expected to launch tonight at 10:34 p.m. ET. TechCrunch reports:

  22. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    "[SpaceX's] Crew Dragon vehicle has flown thirteen public and private missions to orbit. Because of this success, Dragon will end up flying 14 operational missions to the station for NASA, earning a tidy fee each time, compared to just six for Starliner. Through last year, Boeing has taken $1.5 billion in charges due to delays and overruns with its spacecraft development."

    BUT MUSK!!!!

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      SpaceX has now flown 200 successful missions in a row, using the most complex rockets in history, without losing a payload due to a rocket malfunction.
      This is a record unparalleled in the launch business. Nobody else is even remotely close to that, and nobody else has flown orbital reusable rockets either.

      But congress continues to plow billions into Boeing.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        OK, Musk and MIC graft.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        But congress continues to plow billions into Boeing.

        Because the left are desperate for another corporation to come up with a working rocket system, so that the feds can finally put a leash on Elon for not going along in lockstep with their march towards the communist utopia.

        Kyrsten Sinema, a Senator who voted with the Dems 95% of the time, got completely exiled from the party for opposing the filibuster and the Green New Deal. Meanwhile, Bernie talks a good game about being an "independent," but he'll dutifully vote for anything the Dems put in front of him.

      3. R Mac   1 year ago

        “ Too many non-technical managers at Boeing.”

        https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1787531120852312388

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          Elon Musk

          @elonmusk
          ·
          19h
          How do they even get any work done with so many whistles being blown!?

        2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Too many non-technical female managers at Boeing

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Gwynne Shotwell, Chief operating officer of SpaceX, on the other hand, is a technical female manager. She’s an engineer and knows her physics.

        3. JesseAz   1 year ago

          DEI managers make things so much more effective.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            Fortunately the tide is starting to turn.

            https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mit-scraps-diversity-statements-in-faculty-hiring-process-after-discovering-they-don-t-work/ar-BB1lRFgL

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Statements. Just means removing it publicly.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                The fact that they felt the need to make the statement is still a start.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      I thought I remember hearing that Musk's Falcon rockets are putting up something like 80-85% of the government's satellites now.

      That's a big reason the government hasn't tried to take him out yet; they can't federalize SpaceX without confirming that they are, in fact, marxists, and subsequently losing their capability of putting shit in space. Musk would just liquidate everything and tell the feds "good luck replacing your dying satellite constellations."

  23. Nobartium   1 year ago

    How does that app not obviously violate copyright?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Are your tits trade-marked?

      1. Ska   1 year ago

        Yes, and they're spectacular.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          Fabulous.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          +1 Teri Hatcher

          1. mulched   1 year ago

            +2 Teri Hatcher

    2. ducksalad   1 year ago

      Derivative works are fair use.

      1. Nobartium   1 year ago

        I fail to see how that is derivative.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          If you painted tits on the Mona Lisa, it would be derivative. But you can’t sell it.

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            Excuse my nitpicking, but bad example. Mona Lisa is public domain.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              It is pubic domain after porn hub gets done with it.

            2. Ajsloss   1 year ago

              Fine. How about Marge Simpson?

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                Dude, keep your special fantasies to yourself.

              2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                Rule 34.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        No. No they're not.

        Copyright protection is available for various types of creative works, including what are known as derivative works. A derivative work is based on a work that has already been copyrighted. The new work arises—or derives—from the previous work.

        If you own the copyright to a work, you need to be aware that you also have rights to derivative works. If you're considering incorporating someone else's work into your new work, you need to be aware that you may be violating the copyright to the original work.

        There are two ways that derivative rights are protected under copyright law.

        First, the derivative work has protection under the copyright of the original work. Copyright protection for the owner of the original copyright extends to derivative works. This means that the copyright owner of the original work also owns the rights to derivative works. Therefore, the owner of the copyright to the original work may bring a copyright infringement lawsuit against someone who creates a derivative work without permission.

        Second, the derivative work itself has copyright protection. The creator of the derivative work owns the copyright to the derivative work. This can either be the creator of the original work, or someone else who has obtained a derivative work license from the holder of the original copyright.

        [legalzoom.com]

        1. ducksalad   1 year ago

          You know, after reviewing the law, it appears you’re partially right. The work has to be “transformative” not merely derivative, and that would depend on the amount of new material.

          So, if she was already down to a thong and your AI removed it, that would be a copyright violation.

          But if applied to that Mormon librarian, I think we could dismiss the face and hands as incidental minor elements.

  24. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Pornhub's top adult content creator is promoting an AI nonconsensual 'nudify' app.

    Skynet is going to be pissed when it discovers Pr0nhub so showing naked pics of it.

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      So, if I were to happen to come across a picture of Miley Cyrus naked, would I have to get Miley Stewart or Hannah Montana’s consent before viewing? How do I know?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        As if there weren’t enough of those out there already.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          Right and as a libertarian obviously my primary concern is with avoiding IP theft from fictional characters.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    "Can we be surprised that such a system has produced generations of journalists who endlessly describe anything they disagree with as misinformation and want to control and regulate everything like the room temperature in an after-school enrichment program?"

    Politico can't print that!

  26. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

    Wow trump is not totally wrong about his case being political persecution.

    Liz he is 100% correct on that. If you think these cases have any legitimacy you are either evil, retarded, or both

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The documents case is also falling apart. Sullum won't mention that though. Who cares how much the state does wrong in that case.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        It's not like the doj admitted in court to tampering with evidence

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          This is why Jack Smith was livid when the case moved out of D.C. to a federal court in Florida. This judge has no qualms exposing the bad acts of his team.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      Julie Kelly is a great follow on this topic. The shit she’s posting is insane.

      https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1787840308320891106

    3. Foo_dd   1 year ago

      the charges that seem legit are the election interference ones. but nobody is going to notice them thanks to the combination of the wait to bring those charges and the obviously bogus nonsense going on in NY. it is almost like this NY DA wants Trump to win..... it neuters the impact of any charges that may be legit and sets trump as the martyr he wants to play.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        They don't even "seem" legit. They seem clownish when you tell people he was interfering in an election by petitioning the courts, just like Gore did.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          I want to say they are the most absurd of all. But the DC insurrection stuff and the New York trials are probably just as nuts. And maybe the documents too, given recent news on that front.

        2. Foo_dd   1 year ago

          he did a whole lot more than petition the courts. (of course, you know that.)

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Be specific. Such as?

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              Tweets! Mean tweets.

              1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                I'll take "shit i never said" for $200.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Thats my complaint. You haven't said anything of value.

                  1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                    and you have?

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Yes. Go read the comments. Precedence. Evidence in indictment.

                      Want to try again?

          2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            "he did a whole lot more than petition the courts. (of course, you know that.)"

            No I don't.
            And you don't either, or you would have said why.

            1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

              "No I don’t."

              liar. even if you don't think he was wrong, you know there was more than sending lawyers to court.

              1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                WHY!? Why? why why why why why? WHY?

                It's always fucking hints and allusions with you. You refuse to actually say why, because you have absolutely nothing.

                You have to imply because you have nothing real.

                1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                  why, why ,why....why why why..... can't you just admit that you are full of shit? it is absolutely impossible that anyone paying enough attention to feel the need to comment would be ignorant of the fact that he did more than just send some lawyers to court.

                  you
                  are
                  a
                  liar

                  1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                    What more did Trump do? Be specific. You haven't given any answers to JesseAz or Mother's Lament as to what exactly Trump did. Tell us, if you're so wise.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        How are those charges legit? You have the 1960 Hawaii precedent. Active lawsuits were still going when the alternate electors were selected. They even had public statements at the time the electors were for if a court over ruled elections.

        1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

          he wasn't calling for a recount on a tight result, he was calling for the results to be completely ignored. anyone not playing stupid partisan games can see what happened there at least warrants some careful consideration. (which is why his only defense there is to try and claim a sitting president must be completely above the law.)

          but, like i said, it does not really matter anymore. the strained logic to use a minor campaign finance violation, that the fed already passed on, to manufacture multiple felonies is enough that nobody takes any of the charges seriously.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            I notice your replies are bereft of any facts.

            The results can be ignored if the elections were fraudulent. Multiple courts have noted the illegal election changes. New elections can be rerun when the estimated fraudulent ballots outnumber a winning margin. There was a case literally this year of a court overturning an election due to ballot harvesting.

            So do you have anything not soaked in a narrative bereft of facts?

            Examples of evidence Jack Smith put in his indictment: speeches, petitions, meeting with lawyers.

            Fuck off with your state loving narrative.

            1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

              this was all done in plain view, and if you don't know the facts it is because you are deliberately ignoring them..... and nothing i say is going to break through your BS and lies. (like you bringing up court cases that had absolutely nothing to do with Trump's loss and acting like all of his challenges had not failed prior to Jan 6th.)

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                So you got nothing.

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                What was done in plain view? What was illegal? What facts am I ignoring?

                You have yet to give a solitary fact.

                1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                  neither have you, outside a separate court case about a separate election.

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    I have given multiple facts. You just ignore them.

                    Hawaii 1960 precedent.
                    Illegal election changes.
                    Examples of evidence Jack Smith is using in his claims.

                    I can't provide evidence against your bald assertion as I don't know what your assertion is retard. Other than Trump guilty.

                    Youre the one who made the claim regarding credibility.

                    1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                      "Hawaii 1960 precedent."

                      so, nothing to do with 2020, in any way.

                      "Illegal election changes."

                      so, nothing to do with the outcome.

                      "Examples of evidence Jack Smith is using in his claims. "

                      you mean the part where this was all done in the open....;. just like i fucking said? that trumps own public statements can be used in an indictment doesn't help your narrative as much as your dumb ass thinks.

                      "I can’t provide evidence against your bald assertion as I don’t know what your assertion is retard."

                      considering you just pointed out that the indictment used trumps own words against him, you know exactly what the fuck i am talking about. you are just too stupid to know that "they used my guy's speeches as evidence" isn't a very good defense of what he did.

                      "Other than Trump guilty."

                      i said they were legit. i made no claim on how they would ultimately be decided.

                    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Foo, are you proving to be retarded?

                      1960 100% applies to 2020 as precedent. An alternate set of electors as the court cases were pushed through.

                      Thanks for showing youre an idiot though.

                    3. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                      "An alternate set of electors as the court cases were pushed through. "

                      he continued to push for the alternate electors AFTER THE COURT CASES WERE ALL OVER. there was NOTHING pushing through the courts that would have seated the alternates instead. and yet they continued to push that plan. the issue wasn't naming the fake electors, it was planning to use them AFTER all the court cases had failed. which is absolutely nothing like 1960. when the results went to JFK, nobody was trying to insist they use the Nikon electors instead. it is absolutely absurd that you can't recognize the difference.

            2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

              Fuck off with your state loving narrative.

              It's Orange Man Bad, and nothing more.

              1. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                only to the cult of the brain dead. any thing less than wishing trump would bust a nut in your mouth is "orange man bad" to you ass clowns.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Still nothing but narratives. What facts?

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    IT IS KNOWN!

                  2. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                    the facts you try to deflect from by pointing to a separate court case over a separate election...... while trying to ignore that trump had his days in court and lost..... and STILL tried to overturn the election results. YOUR narrative being that what he did should be legal if the results were still in question while ignoring that those questions had already been legally settled....... a narrative you have to spin because you know what he did, and you know it can only be portrayed as legal by ignoring the facts and deflecting with unrelated BS.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      I utilize that as an example against your retarded narrative.

                      Ballot harvesting was one of the primary issues trump brought to courts and he was dismissed. This despite having video and affidavits.

                      Now we have a court finally interested who overturned an election with the same fucking evidence.

                      Your initial claim is Trump is guilty of something because courts chose to ignore. Yet here we have a case where courts didn't ignore and overturned results.

                      Do you realize how retarded you look?

                    2. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                      "Now we have a court finally interested who overturned an election with the same fucking evidence"

                      i would be interested in how you think the "SAME FUCKING EVIDENCE" was used to prove something in a completely separate election. (especially considering that court ruling was not even in one of the states trump contested the results in.)

                      "Your initial claim is Trump is guilty of something because courts chose to ignore."

                      my claim was that the charges seemed legit. Trump, like anyone else, gets to have his day in court...... but the charges are reasonable. i know blind partisan hacks have a hard time understanding nuance like that. you can't understand anything beyond blind worship or hate.

                      as for the courts... all 60 or or so..... "choosing" to ignore the evidence.... maybe the evidence was not as good as your narrative wants to pretend. fact is that many of the claims made.... and repeated by you guys..... was complete garbage that the lawyers never actually submitted in court because they knew it was garbage and would mean immediately being disbarred. (something most of you clowns don't even know.... what they were saying in the courtroom did not match the press conference claims.)

                      "Do you realize how retarded you look?"

                      your the one who thinks evidence in a separate case in a separate state over a separate election proves something that not one trump lawyer could prove in 60 tries.

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Okay. Got it. Your fucking retarded.

                      Having video of ballot harvesting in 2020 is nothing like having evidence of ballot harvesting in 2024.

                      God damn youre dumb.

                    4. Foo_dd   1 year ago

                      i can't help it if you don't know what "exactly the same" means.

                      your also a liar. the narrative back then was fake ballots, and trying to get mail in ballots thrown out. none of the 60 cases trump brought even mentioned ballot harvesting, let alone provided any evidence of it..... that ALL came from stupid fucks like you watching you tube and thinking you saw something that was actually nothing. (with a little bit of you stupid fucks not knowing that what Rudy said at the press conferences was not what he said in court, as i was saying.)

      3. R Mac   1 year ago

        No they’re bullshit too.

  27. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    Dan Froomkin seems like a mendacious bastard.

  28. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Surprised there was no mention of NYC cops deciding to arrest 1000 palestine protestors to protect rich people in awful costumes at the Gala. After letting universities be overrun for weeks.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      That's (D)ifferent.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      At this point anyone denying that we have a multi-tier justice system is dumb as a rock.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        And anyone unhappy about that is not a progressive Democrat, i.e. "good person".

  29. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    "The liberal judge in New York just threatened to THROW ME IN JAIL," Team Trump wrote in a fundraising email. "They want me in HANDCUFFS."

    And also in a cart on the way to the guillotine. While Hillary knits and cackles.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      At least the rest of us will be eating cake bugs.

    2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      That would be Kamala doing the cackling.

      1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

        In between gulps of shrimp & grits, no doubt.

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      I'm waiting for them to put him on a little TV like they did to the Red SUV guy.

  30. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Stunning press dishonesty'

    Not again!

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Classic symptom of early-stage TDS: Ted Cruz Comes Out Against Liberal Democratic Values

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      I'm shocked...shocked...

  31. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Who will be dumb enough to become Donald Trump's vice president?
    The position of Trump's vice president brings with it the kind of job safety only found among nervous snake handlers and crash-test dummies.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/05/05/trump-vp-running-mate-2024-election/73558485007/

    Down-Lo Bro emerges as favorite to wear the Miss Trump crown! Doug Burgham slated for Miss Congeniality.

    Mike Pence last seen crying in the bathroom.

    Follow The Buttplug on YouTube for updates! Make sure to subscribe!

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      TTTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRUUUUUUMMMMMPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!

      What else you got?

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Hey. He also had his standard racism.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      And while you’re at it, please enlighten all of us as to why you have a “2” after your name. And no bullshit about loosing a password.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Read my blog, you dicksuck.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Gross, pedo.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Your blog doesn’t explain why you have that “2” after your name. Care to enlighten the commentariat as to why, Plugazoid?

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Plus the high risk of child prom on his blog.

          2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            I heard he somehow mysteriously forgot his password for a website he trolled every day, and it had nothing to do with getting permabanned by Reason for posting child pornography links.

            1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

              permabanned by Reason

              Hey dumbass, you know Reason scans these posts?

              Yet somehow they let me post with essentially the same user name. They even referenced me by name on the old Twitter.

              1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                essentially the same user name.

                Lol.
                I'm saving that one.

              2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Yet somehow they let me post with essentially the same user name.

                Why, because you promised to be a good boy and not post that crap again, but still had to use a different email address and put the "2" on the end with the original name permabanned?

              3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                Yes, they scan these posts. That’s how they permabanned your old moniker in the first place, dingbat.

        3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Read my blog, you dicksuck.

          LOL, no thanks, we don't need our ISP going on a law enforcement pedo monitoring list.

    3. R Mac   1 year ago

      I didn’t know they allowed child porn on YouTube, pedo?

  32. Randy Sax   1 year ago

    Much of Trump's current campaign is "they cheated, we won last time" and "all this lawfare is election interference". I don't see much in the way of policy. Lets say Trump does win the white house in November. What does the second Trump presidency actually look like?

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      More tariffs, lots of name-calling, bigger deficits, more Aborto-Freaks appointed to the judiciary.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        “Aborto-freaks” sounds more like the people who want abortion up until the Magic Birth Canal Fairy does her work.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Are Aborto-Freaks the ones who butcher babies or the ones against that?

    2. Think It Through   1 year ago

      From what I read, kind of a combo of The Handmaid's Tale and The Third Reich with The Road. So I hear.

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        Don't forget Roots.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        So should I invest in cattle car stocks again in anticipation of demand skyrocketing?

    3. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Nonstop pussy grabbing?

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        One can hope.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Yeah, you can hope it's actual pussy.

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            There’s nothing wrong with ladydick!
            /jeff

            1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

              If you're grabbing for one and coming up with the other... oh wait, Crocodile Dundee already did that.

              1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

                Btw, that scene was cut out when I saw this movie recently.
                But there is a scene later on where he is at a party and does it again to a woman. That scene was not cutout and the joke failed because you didn’t see the pretext. Funny that scene where he grabs the woman in the crotch stayed but the scene where he does it to the trans is cut.

                1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

                  I was watching Joe Dirt on Comedy Central and, of course, they bleeped out when Joe said that thing the trans killer (Buffalo Bob) was doing with the dog was "a little fruity". But they let the oil rig guy call Joe a "queer", as in "you probably liked J.R., you queer."

                  So, you can derogatorily refer to a man as a queer, but you can't say that a man in makeup sucking face with a dog is fruity.

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

      He has released a number of plans.

      https://www.boundless.com/blog/trump-immigration-plan-2024-election/

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/05/trump-ukraine-secret-plan/

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        And much of leftist media is stating it is the Heritage plan. They can’t stop freaking out about it.

        https://democrats.org/news/fact-check-donald-trump-is-running-on-the-project-2025-agenda/

      2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        He has released a number of plans.

        AND MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THEM!

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Shrike, why did you skip over the link about bank failures. Youre an economy guy. Just curious.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Puzzling, isn't it.

          2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            Bank failures? what bank failures?

            Oh, the measly little THREE of them in his entire term?

            #GETYOURBLACKASS-BACK TO 2008.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Oh. So the other couple hundred at similar risks to the ones that failed... must not be real. We are in the greatest economy of your lifetime after all.

    5. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Do you really think Trump’s Deranged Supporters give a flying fuck about policy? They could care less. They just want a political strongman who hates the same people they hate.

      If they cared about policy then they'd credit Biden for continuing and expanding upon the tariffs they so vehemently defended.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        This looks really retarded after I just posted a subset of his plans. Why are all your thoughts based around your ignorance?

        What's Joe's plan?

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Do you really think Joe's Deranged Supporter gives a flying fuck about policy?
          He could care less. He just admires a political strongman who destroys the people he hates.

      2. R Mac   1 year ago

        It’s funny how dumb you make yourself look by muting people that contradict your narrative before you spew it.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          For Sarckles:

          JesseAz 30 mins ago
          He has released a number of plans.

          https://www.boundless.com/blog/trump-immigration-plan-2024-election/

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/05/trump-ukraine-secret-plan/

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            Hatred for immigrants vermin poisoning the blood of the nation, check.
            Hatred for Ukraine because of the connection to Biden, check.

            Any more hate-based policies?

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Weren't you just saying that "Do you really think Trump’s Deranged Supporters give a flying fuck about policy?"

              You're honestly amazing.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                I said they want someone who hates the same people they hate. So you confirm that by bragging about him hating the same people you hate. And then double-down with a sarcastic personal attack against someone you hate. So much hate. Must be exhausting.

                1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

                  ""So much hate. Must be exhausting.""

                  Can't be as exhausting as the hate after Trump won.
                  Never seen such tantrum throwing in my life.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    HE DIDN'T WIN! THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN! YOU VOTED FOR BIDEN! YOU'VE GOT TDS! AAAUUUGGGHHH!

                    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                      All caps now. Nice.

                    2. R Mac   1 year ago

                      It’s a whole new level of broken when you start mocking your own tribe.

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      He went full sqrsly!

                    4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      Channeling Sqrlsy, Sarc?

            2. R Mac   1 year ago

              Hey look, sarc’s back to supporting the MIC proxy war with our tax dollars!

              I suspected he was full of shit when he pretended he doesn’t support it.

            3. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Look at the little leftist shit continue with arguments around morality. A common tactic used by retards to not discuss reality.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Look, Buttplug's buttboy showed up.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Hilarious how the same people who accuse Trump critics of TDS are sooooooo offended when it's thrown back at them.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Now tell us that you are equally skeptical of Biden and all his deranged supporters.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              What deranged supporters? His approval numbers are in the tank. Even NPR has stopped defending the guy.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                Luke Skywaker.

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                Weird. When I go to articles here about Biden I see no criticisms of him from you and always trying to deflect to Trump.

          2. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Lol!

            Look how pissed you get when called put for being a leftist or having TDS. You cry about it all the time. Yet for years called people you hate trump cultists or forever trumpers.

            Youre so mad about it you are trying and failing at rebranding TDS.

            The fucking lack of self realization is off the charts.

      4. DesigNate   1 year ago

        The only time they’ve said anything bad about Biden’s tariffs was when they were more protectionist than retaliatory.

        People don’t want to discuss his policies, they just want to throw around words like racist, xenophobe, and bigot.

    6. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Simply not being Joe Biden may be sufficient, now that we’ve had 4 years of Papa Joe. Simply not being Hillary Clinton was enough to get his win the first time.

      Pretty much the only good thing we got from Biden is no more mean tweets.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        I understand that. I was asking more about policy after victory.

        Immigration reform - check
        Saber rattling at China/Russia/North Korea - check
        ATF reform?
        FBI reform?
        Social security changes?
        Energy policy?

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

          Energy Policy?

          Sleepy Joe has us more energy independent than ever.

          #JoeKnowsEnergy

          (seriously, Fatass Donnie and Old Joe are both idiots on energy. The private sector got this)

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            It’s those greedy oil companies raised the price of gas for no reason

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Do you know how retarded that comment reads?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Unfortunately, I don’t think he does as he posted it. But, if we know anything, it’s that Turd is a lying retard.

          3. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Amazing how you credit Joe despite his actions on energy.

          4. CE   1 year ago

            Yeah, rig count is up.
            But "rig count" shouldn't include the number of precincts where the vote is rigged.

        2. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Look at the Heritage 2025 plan. Seems to be what he is using as a basis. But he has openly said what he will attempt for federal employees. Why Joe is rushing to add more protections to that group.

        3. CE   1 year ago

          Trump ain't changing Social Security. Old people are his base.

        4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          Stop doing many of the stupid things Joe's been doing?

          Stop excusing student loans.
          Stop inviting the world to our border.
          Stop bringing illegal aliens in by the planeload.
          Stop hampering Border Patrol.
          Stop catch&release.
          Stop shutting down drilling leases.
          Stop funding wars around the world.
          Stop inserting US troops into wars around the world.
          Stop subsidizing "green energy" (Infrastructure Act).
          Stop subsidizing wealthy companies like Intel (CHIPS Act).

    7. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      What does the second Trump presidency actually look like?

      Much like the first but with fewer fucks given.

      So, better than what we have now.

    8. CE   1 year ago

      Trump doesn't need a platform. His platform is to remove the incompetents at all levels of the Biden Administration.

    9. Incunabulum   1 year ago

      Probably much like the first.

      Some deregulation, a lot of backstabbing because he appoints swamp creatures to drain the swamp, and a lot of deep-state interference.

  33. Think It Through   1 year ago

    Anyone care to explain what a "nudify app" is or does? The blurb does not explain.

    Asking for, uh, a friend.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      It’s probably a reactionary response to the “modesty app” created by 4channers that took the body tats, facial piercings, and slutty clothes off of the pics of Instathots and put them in traditional clothes and without any of the trauma-induced body modifications.

      Which is going to be interesting, because the internet for over 25 years was already notorious for "pornifying" pictures anyway, especially of little kids, by photoshopping faces and putting them on nude models. How do you think Buttplug was able to link that here before his account was banned?

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      It's essentially an automated version of "Deepfake" nudes that have 'plagued' sites like Mr. Skin/Celebrity skin since the earliest days.

      Whereas someone *used* to have to photoshop [insert female actresses headshot here] onto a [insert porn star's body here]. Now, AI can comb the internet for various nudes and nude composites and manipulate photoshop itself based on what it has collected.

      It is however, still unclear on how, exactly, the AI defines what a woman is.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Could be more fun if the AI editing can effectively remove the clothing while maintaining the same body.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          I was speaking more generally. The idea isn’t new. There are dozens if not hundreds of them. The ‘feature’ you indicate is almost certainly included in several. They don’t work on magic, i.e., if you’ve got a tattoo or birthmark somewhere naughty and you don’t post pictures of it, all the nudify apps are going to generate nudes that are obviously fake to anyone who knows you have the tattoo/birthmark.

          I don’t work on the dev team of any of them but am aware that, as indicated, since the early days of photoshop, the idea of digitally stitching together various parts of nudes into one whole nude has been a thing and, true to AI form, once you’ve got enough material for the abstract model, the pose is a bit immaterial.

          IMO, the nude augmented reality, a.k.a. instagram filters, will be far more fun if anyone ever gets one effectively into a marketplace. Would really add a punch to those Zoom meetings where you’re speaking and have to picture everyone naked to make yourself less nervous.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Or more, um, stimulating when all the people on the Zoom call can be turned into hotties in real time.

          2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            No nudie filter needed with Jeff Tubin on the zoom call.

            1. Zeb   1 year ago

              There's another market opportunity. A filter that hides nudity so you can jack it during meetings without anyone noticing.

              1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

                He's just shucking an ear of corn...

                1. Zeb   1 year ago

                  I saw a pretty funny video a while ago where someone had taken porn video and put cartoon stuff over all the naughty bits.

                  1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

                    I saw that movie. I think it was called Heavy Metal.

                    Good soundtrack.

                2. R Mac   1 year ago

                  Lol

  34. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    U.S. Oil and Gas Production Continues to Shatter Records
    ....
    By Robert Rapier - May 05, 2024, 10:00 AM CDT
    U.S. oil production is 1.4% higher than last year's record pace.
    U.S. natural gas production is 1.1% higher than a year ago.
    Elevated crude oil prices are expected to support continued production growth

    https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/US-Oil-and-Gas-Production-Continues-to-Shatter-Records.html

    #USA-kicking-ass

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Is this increase on federal lands using leases Joe signed? Just curious.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        NO ONE KNOWS OIL AND GAS LIKE SLEEPY JOE DOES!

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Nice, full on total derangement there. Love the all caps, Pluggo. They fit you well.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            It is a parody of Fatass Donnie, you idiot.

            He has said he is the world's leading expert on everything - biotech, pharma, defense, taxes, etc etc etc..

            #DonnieFull of Shit

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Right. Its just you, you lying retarded moron.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          So Buttplug, seeing as this is only happening because the courts overthrew Biden's bans on drilling and some of the pipelines, shouldn't you be praising the judges instead?

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            It's happening because of production on private land. The president has influence over new production on federal land. That's it as far as I can tell. As discussed below that is a fraction of a fraction. Unless you're a math-challenged right-winger, in which case it's a UGE amount.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Notice that sarc isn't attacking shrikes attempt at crediting Joe for energy oracle's Joe can't directly effect, instead sarc claims it is those pointing this out to shrike that are wrong. Lol.

        3. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

          ""The United States has been an annual net total energy exporter since 2019""

          Biden keeping the path Trump helped put us on?

          https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/us-energy-facts/imports-and-exports.php#:~:text=U.S.%20total%20energy%20imports%20increased%20slightly%20in%202022%E2%80%94from,65%25%E2%80%94and%20for%20about%2027%25%20of%20total%20energy%20exports.

          1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

            I have no problem giving Biden some credit about oil production.

            Actually, I would like to give him every bit of perceived credit and wave it in front of his anti-oil voters. Here is your green energy President smucks.

            1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

              I'm pro alt-energy.

              But energy demand is just growing faster than alt is. We have to have both.

              I agree with Obama - natural gas is the bridge fuel for decades.

              1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

                I'm pro energy.

                Especially when demand grows. Keep every existing power plant open while adding alt. Solar and wind will probably never cut it on its own. Oil and gas is still the bridge to future power sources. Natural gas will only suppliment.

            2. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Except you can't give him credit as without the courts production on federal lands would be down. Likewise his administration has blocked creation of new refineries with excess costs and regulations. Everything he has done has been to reduce energy.

              Just because the markets expand in spite of him doesn't mean he deserves any credit.

              1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

                Oil and gas production is a tricky mess in the US.

                You get more when the price is higher because some wells are harder to extract from than others. They come back online when a barrel of oil is $40-$60-$90... whatever makes them profitable.

                But that's a losing game. When Saudi was flooding the market a decade ago oil got below $60 a barrel. Post pandemic, it has been between $80 and $120. Non-profitable wells at $50-60 are profitable at $80 and VERY worth opening at $100.

                So the US is a net exporter because worldwide supplies are down (oil is fungible, price is globally affected) while marginally productive wells on current leases are worth tapping again.

                Of course, if you keep signalling that you're shutting down the oil industry, stopping leases, increasing regulations, and generally saying there's no future for oil companies, you'll get a lot less investment. So oil companies will pump what they've got, but won't invest in new production because they can't justify the cost and risk if they can't be exploiting the new find in a decade or two.

                So, without the exploration and without more wells coming online that are productive at a reasonable price, oil prices will never come down below a certain level. The CAN'T, because low-productivity wells will run at a loss so go offline until the next spike in prices.

        4. JesseAz   1 year ago

          So that is a yes? Or is it a no?

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      So, um, Plugazoid, how much of this is from new leases on federal lands?

    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Your "facts" don't promote the right-wing narrative, so they're wrong.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Fake News OilPrice.com is funded by George Soros.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        White knighting the Pedo is not a good look on you.

      3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Your “facts” don’t promote the right-wing narrative, so they’re wrong.

        Hey Sarckles!

        Speaking of people with narratives... True or false?

        This is only happening because judges threw out multiple bans against pipelines and drilling on public lands made by Biden's executive orders.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          You’re talking about a fraction of a fraction of total production. The percentage of total production on public land is not much, and you're talking about a fraction of that. Why don’t you look up some hard numbers instead of relying upon far-right talking points.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Banning drilling on all public land is "a fraction of a fraction of total production"?

            Are you fucking high? A quarter of all crude oil and more than a tenth of all natural gas was produced on territory owned by the federal government in 2021.

            That's not a fraction of a fraction by any metric.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Here: https://usafacts.org/articles/how-much-oil-and-gas-comes-from-federal-territory/

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                You're unwittingly confirming my point.

                1. R Mac   1 year ago

                  25% and 10% are “a fraction of a fraction”?

                  So we can ad “fraction” to the list of words sarc doesn’t understand.

                2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                  One quarter of every barrel is a fraction of a fraction. You're a real spectacle, Sarckles.

            2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              What was banned was new leases, not existing production.

              So the relevant question is how many new leases were stopped, and how much would they have produced?

              What fraction of the 1/4 of total crude production and what fraction of the 1/10 of total natural gas production does that amount to?

              If you look at it honestly then it is a fraction of a fraction.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                By the way, this is a defense of math. Not a defense of Biden. Unless you’re one of those who think math itself is leftist. There are a lot of them out there. They know who they are.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Are you retarded? Shrike is literally crediting Biden for it and you attack those who show him that credit is wrong.

                  You have serious fucking issues.

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                So you admit shrike was wrong as you defend him. Lol.

                And attack those who have been pointing this out for 4 years.

                Seriously man. What odd behavior.

          2. JesseAz   1 year ago

            So you agree shrikes narrative of crediting Joe is wrong, yet you defend his narrative. What odd behavior.

      4. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Sarc, why are you dishonestly condoning shrikes strawman creation? Oh. Because youre a dishonest fuck lol.

      5. DesigNate   1 year ago

        When we discussed this earlier this year I linked how a lot of that increase is due to increased efficiencies, which is something Biden has 0 control over.

    4. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      Yet, gas prices up over 50% since January 2021.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Demand.

        You know it is a thing, right?

        Demand cratered when Fatass Donnie was POTUS. Then prices crashed.

        And all of MAGA America thinks that was his policy lowering gas prices.

        No, it was the shit economy.

        1. Nobartium   1 year ago

          Mean tweets and cheap gas!

          Fuck your shares!

        2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

          The only shit economy you can point to under Trump is the pandemic years.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            The only shit economy you can point to under Trump is the pandemic years.

            One year to be precise.

            Donnie's first three years were average at best. Joe's first three years had higher GDP and better jobs numbers.

            So take out the Covid year - nothing special left.

            1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

              Joe's first three year was covid recovery.

            2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

              ""Donnie’s first three years were average at best.""

              Trump had a better GDP average than Obama.

            3. JesseAz   1 year ago

              You really are a dumbfuck aren't you shrike. Most of the GDP growth under Joe is returning to pre covid production and government spending.

              You can't help yourself.

              1. DesigNate   1 year ago

                Worse than that, many sectors have just now recovered to where they were in 2019.

                God he is such a demshill.

  35. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

    Scenes from New York: As I previously reported, Airbnb was essentially banned in the city (and the city has contracted with lower-priced hotels to serve as migrant shelters, at taxpayers' expense). Look what happened to hotel prices (I believe the poster filtered for Marriott):

    No offense, but why should I care if hotel prices in one of the most expensive neighborhoods in the country, in one of the biggest tourist-trap areas of New York City, has nightly hotel costs at nearly $1K a night? That isn't going to affect me one iota, and the people staying in those places can likely afford it anyway.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Because now regular tourists have been priced out of a chance to get mugged on the subway?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Exponential cultural enrichment!

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      I know many people who come to NYC to visit. None of them pay that much for a hotel room.

      1. rbike   1 year ago

        I stayed in Newark. 15-30 minutes to NYC.

  36. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    spiked.com

    "I thought we had decided, as a society, that women should be free to breastfeed without being gawped at by blokes? That mums should have the right to nurse, wherever they might find themselves, without being irked by dickheads? Well, it seems we’ve changed our minds. It seems we’ve instituted a new rule: that a man’s ‘right’ to hang around feeding mothers counts for more than a mother’s right to feed in peace. And you’ll never guess which ideology is responsible for this trouncing of nursing mums’ dignity? Yep, the trans ideology.

    "Not content with sauntering into women’s sports or sitting balls-out in women’s changing rooms, now it seems some ‘transwomen’ – ie, fellas – want the right to mingle in breastfeeding circles. This is the news that La Leche League GB (LLLGB), the British wing of the world’s largest breastfeeding charity, is under pressure to allow ‘transwomen’ – again, fellas – to use its services. This could possibly mean that at one of their breastfeeding support groups, where new mums gather to discuss their nursing struggles, there could be a big bloke in a dress moaning about his dry-ass nipples and lack of lactation. Honestly, it’s the last thing a new mum needs.

    "It is the board of directors of La Leche League that is insisting the British division of its charity take the knee to the gender cult. It will surprise not one living soul that the board is based in the US. According to the Telegraph, they’ve instructed LLLGB that their services ‘cannot be single sex’ and they must agree to offer advice on ‘male lactation’. Perhaps they must also agree that 2 + 2 = 5. Worse, LLL’s American bosses have reportedly said the term ‘mother’ can be a ‘roadblock’ in certain discussions around breastfeeding and that questioning gender ideology is ‘harmful’.

    "This is proper lunacy, isn’t it?

    "I don’t know if this counts as ‘harmful’ but someone needs to say it: men can’t breastfeed. Sure, they can undergo hormonal procedures that mimic, to a degree, the process of lactation. But what comes out ain’t ‘mother’s milk’, and everyone knows it. Worse, most of these men tend to be on estrogen and other supplements, to aid their ‘gender transition’. So there’s no telling what medical residues might lurk in whatever gunk comes from their ‘breasts’. Nothing better captures the neo-misogyny of the woke era than the fact that mums who feed their babies formula milk are condemned while men who foist druggy secretions on mewling infants are celebrated. Women who do their best are damned, while men who do the worst are cheered – it’s Sexism 101.

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Fuck ’em AFAICT. La Leche is responsible for the bullshit that brought about Pete Buttigieg and his husband shirtless with a newborn that neither of them gave birth to in order to encourage “bonding through skin-to-skin contact”.

      A retard fight where the only people to lose are women in the post internet era who can’t figure out how to do, or not to do, what women have been doing since before apes descended from trees.

      To be clear: Yeah, I defend a mother's right to privacy but, again AFAICT, that's not synonymous with LLLGB and LLLGB is largely responsible for these particular chickens coming home to roost.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Hey, if trannies can chest feed in public, can their "baby" be a 40 year old midget with a two day beard?

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "Perhaps they must also agree that 2 + 2 = 5"

      I'll never understand how that idea got any form of traction whatsoever. It really felt like it was a "Let's see what we can get them to repeat this time!" experiment.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Lying Jeffy fell for it.

  37. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Goddamnit, the news is boring without the fake impeachment and the stupid Hunter Biden Penis fake scandal.

    When are wingnuts going to gin up a new fake scandal?

    #HunterBidenManWhore

    #SLOPPY-PULLOUT!

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      When you stop posting fake news?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Is Bill Gates still implanting micro-chips in everyone to control the population?

        ZeroHead and Gateway Pundit haven't mentioned him lately.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Is he, Plugly?

          He's been advocating so much creepy shit lately, that one would no longer surprise me. You sure do love the psychopaths, huh.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            Link?

            I'm not up to date on the crazy-ass wingnut sites anymore.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Hey, you're the source, so I'm asking you.

            2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

              “ZeroHead and Gateway Pundit haven’t mentioned him lately.”

              “I’m not up to date on the crazy-ass wingnut sites anymore.”

              Really low effort trolling.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                Turd lies constantly.

  38. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    Compare the Kahn quote to how Froomkin summarizes it

    Journalists work for the Party.

  39. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

    So apparently journoscum Michelle Kosinski had a dinner with some “friends of friends” who were conservative. Showing the hilarious lack of self-awareness endemic white female leftists, she was shocked at how “normal” and successful they were–educated people with Ivy League degrees and businesses.

    She’s doing some cope-worthy middle school “MAGAts triggered” nonsense on Twatter now that her story went viral, but she’s right to be afraid–she might be starting to realize that when the road war kicks off, it’s not going to be some easily fooled farm-dwelling hee-haw out in the sticks that she has to worry about. It’s that the knife sliding into her and her husband’s ribs is likely going to come from someone in her own socio-economic class. A delicious irony for a champagne socialist who loves to throw her social status in the faces of people who don't follow her political ideology.

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Has anyone ever asked her what is evil about making America great?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        "It means Make America White Again, duh-doy!"

    2. CE   1 year ago

      Some of her less-discerning friends have friends who are... gasp... Republicans?

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      it’s not going to be some easily fooled farm-dwelling hee-haw out in the sticks that she has to worry about.

      Just wait until she finds out that the President’s son knocked up a stripper while he was cheating on his wife with his dead brother’s widow and struggling with addiction... and; between his sister’s journal detailing how Dad used to shower with her and Dad himself saying things like “the problem with China, Japan, and India is that they’re all xenophobic”, the rest of the family isn’t much better.

      There are people married to their own siblings (in Congress even) that don’t check off as many White Trash checkboxes as irrefutably and overtly shamefully as the Bidens.

  40. R Mac   1 year ago

    Missed it at the time but he reposted in response to McArdle asking why Reason is so hostile to the LP. Always makes me smile when the commentariat gets a mention.

    Fine, I'll do an effortpost on Reason magazine. Here are the facts:

    1) Anecdotally, on both social media posts and in their own comment threads, Reason is regularly attacked and ratioed by their own readers.

    2) Reason journalists support Democrats disproportionately. In 2020, Reason tallied their journalists votes. The results were:

    Jorgensen: 10
    Biden: 6
    Trump: 1

    Libertarians can always come up with a reason that one candidate is the "lesser evil", but this is way off from how libertarians voted nationwide.

    3) Reason magazine has 51,000 paying subscribers who pay $15-$20/year. At $15 for 11 copies of a print magazine, it's unclear that this is even a break-even price for distribution, let alone labor. Their 2022 tax filings report $1,043,588 in program revenues, which matches this.

    4) Reason's tax filings report $13,980,606 in contributions and grants for 2022. Reason is receiving 14 times as much in donations as it is in revenue. Libertarians understand that incentives matter. Reason is incentivized to follow donors, not readers, because that's where the money comes from.

    5) Just a few of the donors contribute outsize amounts. Across 20 years of donations, just 4 donors have contributed 62% of all revenues. DonorsTrust is #4 and excluding them wouldn't change the overall picture.

    The simplest combination of these facts is that Reason exists not to serve a libertarian audience, but for a donor class to push their preferred stories onto libertarians. This donor class is substantially more culturally progressive, egalitarian, globalist, and neoliberal than the libertarian base.

    I'm not making a claim that Reason journalists themselves are told to write certain stories, or that Reason journalists are liars. All that needs to happen is the donors pick the right editor, who then goes out and hires journalists with biases preferred by donors.

    tl;dr - Reason is out-of-touch with libertarians because it's paid to be that way.

    https://twitter.com/jeremykauffman/status/1742572253215175033

    1. R Mac   1 year ago

      The post he was responding to:

      Who would like to help me do research/report on why certain Reason reporters are so hostile to the Libertarian Party? Is it their donors? Their incentives? Granted, there are some "very fine people" at Reason, but the hate bias is obvious.

      https://twitter.com/angela4LNCChair/status/1787661128442536055

      1. ducksalad   1 year ago

        Well, it's not just Reason reporters. Lots of long-term Libertarian Party members are unhappy with the current leadership.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          And lots of us were unhappy with the previous leadership and their support for cultural Marxism.

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

            So things haven't changed all that much over the decades? 1 side claiming to speak for libertarians while the other side is just garbage is their MO.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          Well this is terrible.

          https://twitter.com/LPMisesCaucus/status/1787901993274548594

          1. ducksalad   1 year ago

            It's excellent *IF*

            - the LP nominee has been decided by that time and gets to participate also.

            - the moderator gives all participants comparable chances to speak.

            - Trump actually shows up, or at least is on live video. Live video might be better since the moderator can put him on mute if he declines to let the others talk.

            I can easily see Trump making some demand like a solo appearance, in which case it's back to just McArdle selling the party to Republicans.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              No it’s not.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Live video might be better since the moderator can put him on mute

              Ducksalad swears he's a libertarian.

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Jorgensen: 10

      Consistent with libertarian views.

      You got nothing.

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

        59%.
        Isn’t that a F if we were grading?

        1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

          Only if someone is bound by the white supremacy of the traditional grading scale. Do better.

          1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

            Good one.

          2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

            No, that is the collectivist way of scoring. Back in my traditional school, we each received a grade for our individual work.

      2. R Mac   1 year ago

        I’m not surprised this is your retarded takeaway.

    3. Think It Through   1 year ago

      This is how you do persuasion.

      At least, for those who operate in the realm of logic, not the REEE REEEE REEE RACISTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT persuasion of campus protesters and the like.

    4. CE   1 year ago

      Instead of "pro-freedom" think "pro-corporate freedom" and you'll get the picture. Gun manufacturers, vaccine manufacturers, etc.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Gun manufacturers,

        Phbbbt. LOL. Gun manufacturers is the *one* market they aren’t “pro-corporate freedom” for.

        Not that they’re anti-2A, but for all the “Rah! Rah! Rah! F.I.R.E.!” pieces and all the ads-as-content they publish, never once have they published anything distinctly pro-gun corporation and they frequently Defense Distributed and all manner of futurist-y, libertarian-ish “Decentralize gun culture!” pieces.

        The closest you get to them defending gun manufacturers was the topics covering credit cards making specific merchant category codes for gun shops and, even then, that was more about defending mom-and-pop gun stores over big box and had nothing to do with manufacturers that you can’t just call up and give your credit card number to.

    5. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Great post.

  41. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Overheard 2020:

    Dude, they found dick pics on Hunter Biden's laptop.

    ---Nooo!

    Yes, and the fake news media would not report on the story. No shit.

    --- The fake news media wouldn't run with the dick pics? right before the election?

    No, they didn't. It's proof dude.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Did you deliberately decide to go full retard today, or did something upset you?

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        We broke him a few weeks back. Plus all his pro Joe narratives are collapsing outside of sarc.

    2. CE   1 year ago

      The NY Post reported the story. And was blocked by social media companies as misinformation.

  42. Marshal   1 year ago

    On what basis does Hamas object to escalations? Wasn’t intentionally murdering infants an escalation?

  43. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>”Hamas demands a permanent cease-fire and vows to remain in power there.”

    October 5 2023 is gone.

    1. CE   1 year ago

      Hamas could have had a permanent ceasefire at any time, by meeting just two perfectly reasonable conditions:

      1. Release all of the hostages.
      2. Turn over anyone who participated in or helped plan the attack of October 7th to face justice for their horrific crimes.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        reasonable.

      2. ducksalad   1 year ago

        Challenge: name and quote link for an Israeli cabinet minister with a relevant portfolio who has made that offer.

        Maybe I missed it, all the quotes I’ve seen are no *permanent* ceasefire as long as Hamas exists in any form. Which isn’t a totally unreasonable position given that it’s a war and what happened in October. Total and unconditional surrender followed by occupation at discretion has plenty of precedents.

        However, I’m tired of the “generous offer” lie. Say what the real position is and stop making stuff up.

        1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

          Yoav Gallant:
          https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/gallant-in-message-to-hamas-terrorists-surrender-or-die/

          Give it a read, and more importantly, stop defending Hamas.

  44. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>nonconsensual "nudify" app

    this doesn't sound consensual.

  45. CE   1 year ago

    So Gillespie blames overprotective parents who want their kids to grow up to be productive adults for someone turning them into commie activists? I think he's looking in the wrong direction. Becoming a productive adult is viewed as oppression.

  46. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Reason's Nick Gillespie told Politico's Jack Shafer for a piece on whether the media industry is losing its swagger.

    you'd think of everyone the uber-smart and ever-so-better Jornolists wouldn't not ruin their power ... they're so much better and smarter than everyone else and all ... but here we are

  47. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>”With Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft finally due to take flight this week with astronauts on board, we know the extent of the loss, both in time and money,” reports Ars Technica.

    good G*d what about the astronauts on board?!?!?!

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Probably all white guys, so no big loss.

    2. Zeb   1 year ago

      Maybe Elon should start making passenger aircraft and put Boeing out of its misery.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        I started reading this and thought you were going to say “Maybe Elon should start making passenger spacecraft rescue ships to save all the Boeing astronauts floating around in space.”

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          either or

        2. Stuck in California   1 year ago

          That's a good idea.

          I mean, I've had Jebadiah Kerman floating around in orbit since he ran out of fuel in like 2013. Still haven't figured out how to get him back.

  48. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Airbnb was essentially banned in the city ... Look what happened to hotel prices

    schadenfreude watching mass leftist policies in action ... mho

  49. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) just announced that he is running for reelection.

    nursing home bedsores are horrible.

  50. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    ICYMI:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68947042

    Speaking to a predominantly Asian-American audience at a campaign fundraising event on Wednesday evening, Mr Biden said that the US election this November was about "freedom, America and democracy".

    "Why? Because we welcome immigrants," he added. "Think about it. Why is China stalling so badly economically? Why is Japan having trouble. Why is Russia? Why is India? Because they're xenophobic. They don't want immigrants."

    Tokyo was not amused. Japan’s embassy in Washington said “the comments were not based on an accurate understanding of Japan's policies.”

    New Delhi wasn’t impressed either. India’s Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said India was open to people “who have a claim to come to India” and highlighted its strong economy.

    1. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "Subrahmanyam Jaishankar "

      Gesundheit.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      Adults. Back. In. Charge.

    3. mtrueman   1 year ago

      "They don’t want immigrants."

      Young Japanese women want exciting careers in the cities such as Tokyo, Yokohama and Saga.

      Marriages registered between Japanese husbands and foreign Asian wives first exceeded those between Japanese wives and Western husbands in 1975,1 and then increased further, peaking in 2006 (32,038 couples, 4.4% of all registered marriages in Japan). Despite shrinking since then, the number remains high. In 2020, the number was a third of the peak year, but it still accounted for 2.0 per cent of all marriages registered in Japan (11,473 couples).

      In traditional East Asian paternalism, the first son inherits ancestral assets, typically land, and his wife is responsible for taking care of his elderly parents. In recent decades, fewer people wish to inherit these rural lands; however, the care of elderly parents has remained the responsibility of the son's wife. Men, such as first sons of rural farmers, have thus had difficulty finding wives; subsequently, they looked to other, poorer parts of Asia whose women are seen as good caretakers, contrasting spoiled, overly educated co-ethnic women.

  51. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    Of course it's California and of course it's a union thing.

    Much as I hate self-checkout, this seems like yet another fascist economics position for the state.

    -----------

    "Self-checkout machines could be removed from grocery and drug stores

    A new bill being considered by California lawmakers would impose conditions on stores wanting to use automated rather than manual checkouts

    Stores could be forced to remove self-checkout counters in California under proposed new rules.

    A new bill being considered by state lawmakers on Monday would prohibit grocery and drug stores from using the kiosks unless they meet a series of strict criteria.

    The proposal, which has the support of the UFCW union, comes amidst a huge backlash driven widescale shoplifting, fed-up customers who hate using the machines and staff fearful of losing jobs.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/self-checkout-backlash-continues-as-machines-could-be-banned-under-proposed-new-state-law/ar-BB1lUMxK?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=0501f063fb7c4380860de9024e2a5f85&ei=15

    1. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "A new bill being considered by state lawmakers on Monday would prohibit grocery and drug stores from using the kiosks unless they meet a series of strict criteria."

      That criteria being that you need at least one Californian senator, mayor or congressman to own a franchise location.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Or Governor, like Panera Bread...

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      A new bill being considered by state lawmakers on Monday would prohibit grocery and drug stores from using the kiosks allowing customers from selecting their own items of the shelf without a paid professional shopper assisting them unless they meet a series of strict criteria

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Consider that a lot of these are already being removed voluntarily due to theft. The Dems are basically admitting that their voters are too developmentally stunted to not steal shit and need to be forced to go through a checkout line so they can be stopped at the door.

  52. Jerry B.   1 year ago

    Don’t worry about the Times not pushing the DNC narrative. The Washington Post has already picked up those cudgels.

  53. Incunabulum   1 year ago

    >Note that he is 82 years old, so if he gets elected this time around, he may be serving until he's 88.

    Either somebody can't count or somebody knows something about how long Sanders has left to live.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      How's that again? Senators serve 6 year terms.

  54. Incunabulum   1 year ago

    Is it ‘non-consensual nudity’ if its just faking it? No one’s seeing your actual tits. It’d be like calling a doodle by someone imagining what you look like naked ‘non-consensual nudity’.

    Are we going to call photoshopping someone's head onto a naked body 'non-consensual nudity' too?

    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

      I recommend, for now at least, that you stick to nudifying the dead. You can't libel, defame or slander the dead, so nudifying them shouldn't be a problem.

    2. ducksalad   1 year ago

      If the result was (a) distributed, and (b) good enough to fool viewers, there's a case for libel, e g. putting someone in a false light as someone who does nude modeling.

      Viewing it on your own phone doesn't seem functionally different from imagining someone unclothed, which has been legal and tolerated for at least 100,000 years.

      1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        We don't know when humans started wearing clothing.

  55. mtrueman   1 year ago

    "called a limited operation aimed at destroying Hamas targets it says were used to attack Israeli soldiers," reports The New York Times. "

    We should have learned by now to be skeptical of Israeli propaganda and their American mouth pieces.

    Ori Goldberg, an Israeli political commentator, says the current ceasefire proposal on the table has been agreed by both sides, but Israeli officials are backtracking to stall for time.

    “Based on Israel’s record in these affairs in past wars, this is last-minute posturing. This is an attempt to appear tough and also an attempt to appease Netanyahu’s base, the right-wing elements inside Israel,” he told Al Jazeera.

    But the fact that an Israeli delegation is now in Cairo for talks shows it has “little manoeuvrability left”.

    “I think it’s been made very clear to Netanyahu that he stands to pay a very, very significant personal price if something doesn’t happen very soon,” said Goldberg. “The Israeli-American relationship is probably the worst its ever been.

    “There is no victory in this [for Israel]. None of the goals set out have been met. The management of the war has been catastrophic to say the least.”

    It seems clear that Israel has been posturing since the Iranian attack. The incursion into Rafah doesn't seem to be about destroying Hamas, freeing the hostages or clearing the enclave of Palestinians. Bibi has long been promising an invasion of Rafah, and to appease the god botherers on his right, this is what he comes up with. More show than go.

    "30 for 1"

    I'm surprised to see that Jews have been devalued to such an extent. A few years back, Bibi established a rate of 1000 Palestinians to 1 Jew. Now the exchange rate is 30 to 1?

    1. ducksalad   1 year ago

      In case you weren't just being snarky on the ratio, it has little to do with perceived worth. It's roughly set at a fraction of the prisoners held by each side.

      It was 1000 to 1 when Hamas only held one prisoner to trade and Israel had several thousand.

      1. mtrueman   1 year ago

        " It’s roughly set at a fraction of the prisoners held by each side. "

        I'm not sure. Israel has a history going back to the 1980s of releasing large numbers of prisoners, over 1000, for a handful of Israelis. Or even one. There's also a history of releasing hundreds of Palestinian prisoners without receiving any Israelis in exchange.

        That takes us up to Oct, 2023, when Hamas and other militant groups seized some 240 hostages and returned them to Gaza. Israel until then had some 5000 Palestinians in prison, and this was doubled to 10000 as Israel took Palestinians who were in Israel on work visas and put them in prison, though their fate isn't entirely clear.

        In November, Israel released 240 Palestinian prisoners, 107 of whom were between 14 and 17 years old, and three-quarters of whom had not been convicted of a crime, although some were awaiting trial in a military court. In exchange, Hamas released 105 civilians, which included 81 people from Israel, 23 Thais and one Filipino.

        I'm not sure the exchange rate comes from the number of prisoners held by each side. There is also the invocation of the Hannibal Directive, since Oct. 2023. "The kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces." This would support the view of the Israeli government's cheapening of Israeli (and presumably anyone else in the region) lives. It accounts for the Israeli military's shooting to death of two half naked, unarmed escaped Israeli hostages in Gaza speaking Hebrew and waving a white flag. I'm not sure how the Hannibal Directive influences the exchange rate, but it must cheapen Israeli lives to some degree.

        1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

          You don't have any understanding on how war works. There's nothing wrong with taking as many POWs as possible.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

My City Just Voted for Socialism

Liz Wolfe | 6.25.2025 9:33 AM

Crossing the U.S. Border? Keep Your Electronic Devices Safe from Searches.

J.D. Tuccille | 6.25.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: What Could Go Wrong?

Charles Oliver | 6.25.2025 4:00 AM

The Rationale for Deporting Mahmoud Khalil Is Alarmingly Vague and Broad

Jacob Sullum | 6.25.2025 12:01 AM

Capping Student Loans Won't Destroy Medical Schools

Emma Camp | 6.24.2025 5:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!