Brickbat: Close Enough for the Feds

Federal agents arrested Penny McCarthy at gunpoint outside her home in Phoenix. They insisted that she was Carole Anne Rozak, a fugitive wanted on a 1999 warrant for probation violation in Oklahoma. At first, the U.S. Marshals Service said McCarthy's fingerprints matched Rozak's, but they later admitted the prints did not match, and a judge dropped all charges against McCarthy. A Phoenix TV station reports that the Marshals Service blamed a glitch for the initial fingerprint misidentification. In later court filings the service said that Rozak had stolen McCarthy's maiden name, blaming the mix-up on that. But McCarthy said they have refused to provide her with any information that links Rozak to her identity. "I no longer trust the people who govern me," she said.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"I no longer trust the people who govern me" - The beginning of wisdom.
Agreed! However, alas, also...
“I no longer trust vaccines, people who don't support the Theory of the Stolen Erections, or ANYONE who displays the hallmarks of the Wrong Tribe.” – and - “I no longer trust people who don't fastidiously use preferred pronouns." - The mid-points of tribes-based insanity.
My mistrust in the people who govern me is based on on rational thinking and the foundation of decades of experience. On the other hand, mistrust because a person who governs told you to mistrust, ei. Trump, is beyond irrational, It's plain old loopy.
If I follow you correctly, mistrust Trump because a HUGE portion of his appeal is to appeal to your paranoia and fear of the non-Trumpists!!! FEAR the non-Trump tribe(s) (He commands!). Dems often do likewise, to be sure...
So I agree! Trump and the likes of Trump grab us right in our pussy-grabbers! He appeals to our pussy-grabbers which want to "make the libs cry"! So Trump's followers are pussy-grabbers, and Trump is a pussy-grabber (bad enough) but also a pussy-grabber-grabber (deliberately taking advantage of, milking, our urges to pussy-grab), which is FAR worse!
Dude... you just made Justin Bieber burst into tears! Are you proud of yourself?
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/20/entertainment/justin-bieber-donald-trump-asap-rocky-trnd/index.html
Justin Bieber: I appreciate Trump helping A$AP Rocky, but ‘can you also let those kids out of cages?’
I'm an old fart and barely know who Justin is... I will let ALL (Zero) of MY caged kids OUT of their cages to make shit up to him, though!
So if someone declared the winner of an election tells me to trust the resulting men with guns, and I obey... that's NOT loopy?
She should never have trusted them in the first place.
EEOC Attempts to make “misgendering” a thoughtcrime. Gorsuch gave an inch in Bostock and the fanatically LGBTQ+ dogmatic Biden Administration attempts to take a mile.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4240719-the-eeoc-is-trying-to-make-misgendering-a-thought-crime/
““Harassment,” according to this guidance, includes epithets and physical assault as well as “intentional and repeated use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with the individual’s gender identity (misgendering).” Also included as a form of harassment is “the denial of access to a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility consistent with the individual’s gender identity.”
So, what about employers and employees who are not willing to abandon traditional religious beliefs grounded in biological reality in order to adopt “preferred pronouns”? The guidance is unforgiving: “Employers do not (and cannot) provide Title VII religious accommodations for behavior that is considered harassment.””
Employers will just need to build 57 different kinds of bathrooms! Problem solved! You're welcome!
There are religious beliefs regarding pronouns? It's not in my Bible, what Bible do you use?
It is in your Bible. The biblical text is covered under lying. If you force me under color of law to call some deranged purple-haired skirt-wearing male "she", it is a falsehood.
If I can tell that the due in a dress is a due in a dress, then saying that he's a she is bearing false witness, isn't it?
Yes.
Now imagine playing this insanity game under oath.
Just as with the latest rules from the education department, this seems more likely handing a weapon to use against those they do not like then actually protecting anyone. I can imagine it going something like this, someone that the looney does not like accidently says he or she and instead of just ignoring this or mentioning their pronoun they will file a complaint and HR of course will come down on them with a hammer leading to any normal person just not speaking up in any conversation.
The fix to this is to file a complaint against the looneys every chance you get and I mean ever chance. Same with college campus kangaroo courts, every time you have an interaction with a female file a complaint and if either of these don’t take it as seriously as with the looneys then file a complaint with the Feds until the whole thing comes crashing down…this is how they took down PC the first time around in the 90s. The militant Fems got all upset that so many men filed complaints when it was only supposed to be for them to use but they could not stop them so they dropped it.
To paraphrase one of my favorite Malcom episodes you can’t beat the system but you sure can break it.
https://youtu.be/30IMVEztHDM?t=219
"If I can tell that the due in a dress is a due in a dress..."
Sew then WHO should we be paying our dues too, if snot too the due in the addressed, messed dress?
MY DRESS IS A MESS!!! WHO ken wee BLAME?!?!?
"It is in your Bible."
Yer Bible tells ye the below, so OBEY!!!!
God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!! Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10). Therefore, ALL must have done at least one thing bad, since they’d be righteous, had they never done anything bad. Well, maybe they haven’t actually DONE evil, maybe they THOUGHT something bad (Matt. 5:28, thoughts can be sins). In any case, they must’ve broken SOME commandment, in thinking or acting, or else they'd be righteous. James 2:10 tells us that if we've broken ANY commandment, we broke them ALL. Now we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it (Matt. 5:17). So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything. And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses! There’s working on Sunday. There’s also making sacrifices to, or worshipping, the wrong God (Exodus 22:20, Deut. 17:2-5), or even showing contempt for the Lord’s priests or judges (Deut. 17:12). All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses. OK, so now we’re finally there... God’s Word COMMANDS us such that we’ve got to kill EVERYBODY!!!
(I am still looking for that special exception clause for me & my friends & family… I am sure that I will find it soon!)
Don’t forget… The above ALSO applies to Sacred Fartilized Egg Smells!!!
The entry point to the above-listed Deep Biblical Analysis is…
No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10).
That means that NOT EVEN THE SACRED FARTILIZED EGG SMELLS are righteous! NO exception was listed for egg smells, fartuses, etc.! And if you follow the rest of the Biblical-literalness LOGICAL argument laid out above, then the Bible actually commands us to KILL said Sacred Fartilized Egg Smells!!!
WHERE are the Biblical literalists when we desperately NEED them?!?!
Locals-quality police work at federal prices.
Not even locals quality. That's closer to Keystone Cops level police work at federal prices.
At first, the U.S. Marshals Service said McCarthy's fingerprints matched Rozak's, but they later admitted the prints did not match, and a judge dropped all charges against McCarthy.
Just more proof that anatomy is junk science. - Reason
Penny oughtta be glad she doesn't live in Charleston. So far four minions are dead trying to serve a warrant saying the Second Amendment is dead. Nobody admits knowing what judge signed the warrant that began the carnage, much less why. If it turns out some scofflaw busted for twigs and seeds in the Bush Administration--hence branded a felon--tried to vote or own a gun, THAT explanation for initiating the use of force will never (you can bet) see the light of day.
They're never going to admit they used some half baked age progression software and surveillance tools. She'll settle for a decent chunk of taxpayer money and probably find the lady first.
And why tf are they wasting resources on a 25yo warrant for not reporting to her PO?
The marshalls and anyone else involved in this fuck up must be quaking in their boots
Shirley they will all be fired, at least…
At first, the U.S. Marshals Service said McCarthy's fingerprints matched Rozak's, but they later admitted the prints did not match, and a judge dropped all charges against McCarthy.
OK, so a mistake was made and then remedied. What are we getting worked up over here?