Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee Quietly Kills Clemency Initiative for Drug-Free School Zone Offenders
Lee announced in 2021 that he was fast-tracking clemency petitions for inmates serving mandatory minimums that had since been repealed. Earlier this year, he scrapped the program with applications still pending.

Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee has quietly ended a fast-track clemency process for drug-free school zone offenders who were serving outdated sentences.
Lee announced the initiative in 2021, after the Tennessee Legislature passed reforms to the state's harsh drug-free school zone laws. But those reforms were initially not made retractive, leaving more than 300 people serving sentences that were no longer on the books.
The expedited clemency process was supposed to provide those incarcerated people with a fast avenue for relief, but three years later it's been shut down while some petitions were still pending, according to an email from the Tennessee Attorney General's Office shared by Daniel Horwitz, a Nashville civil rights attorney.
"Earlier this year, the Governor decided to end this expedited review process, and this change was posted publicly on the Department's website," the office wrote to Horwitz in response to a pending petition concerning one of his clients, Wayne Potee.
An undated text box on the department's "agency services" webpage says, "Going forward, requests for clemency for individuals convicted pursuant to the Drug-Free School Zone Act will be reviewed by the Board of Parole."
"Minimal as it was, the Drug-Free School Zone clemency program was among the only positive things that Lee has done for criminal justice reform during either of his two terms as governor," Horwitz says. "Ending the program prematurely and without notice to anyone—particularly after applicants like Wayne Potee were already approved under it—is a betrayal."
A 2017 Reason investigation showed how Tennessee's drug-free school zones covered huge swaths of urban areas and turned minor drug crimes into mandatory minimum prison sentences that rivaled those for second-degree murder and rape.
The Tennessee Legislature passed a bill in 2020 reducing the size of these zones to 500 feet and requiring that the mandatory minimums be applied only if a defendant's conduct actually endangered children. But the new law was not retroactive, so hundreds of offenders were left to serve the remainder of their sentences.
In 2022, the Tennessee Legislature passed its first-ever retroactivity bill, allowing offenders doing time for drug-free school zone offenses under the old law to petition a judge for resentencing.
Potee was one such offender. He was sentenced in 2015 to a 15-year mandatory minimum prison sentence for selling a small amount of meth to an undercover cop in a drug-free school zone. Potee had become addicted to opioids after a shoulder surgery and was cycling through relapse and recovery. He started selling meth so he could afford Suboxone, an opioid addiction medication.
After the retroactivity law was enacted, Potee petitioned judge to be resentenced but was denied. Potee's commutation petition was only approved by the Tennessee Department of Correction and sent to the governor's office this January. While it was still pending, Lee's office quietly ended the initiative without alerting Horwitz, or presumably other petitioners.
It's unknown how many petitions were still pending when Lee's office ended the program, but based on the emails shared by Horwitz, there were at least two.
Horwitz says he was told to resubmit Potee's petition through the Tennessee Board of Parole, only to then be told there was no longer any special consideration for drug-free school zone offenders. Horwitz says obtaining clemency in Tennessee under the standard considerations is "basically impossible, akin to winning the lottery."
Potee remains incarcerated with no possibility of parole. His release date is 2030.
Lee's office did not immediately return a request for comment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tell me again what "expedited" means? I must not be clear on the concept, because to me if the Governor couldn't complete 300 cases in three years - or one hundred per year - or one case per business week - it doesn't seem to say "expedited" to me ...
Not to distract from your 100-business-weeks-a-year math, but are we still jailing insurrectionists? I don’t mean to sound callous about the [glances at story] 2 cases that the State of TN didn’t get around to expediting but it doesn’t exactly sound like these people, the two of them, are being subject to some sort of national-level, or even state-level lawfare campaign.
I mean, I agree that it’s terrible that they’ve fallen through the cracks of the clemency program but unless the libertarians concerned are voting residents of TN, putting up legal funds to right these injustices, or both it seems a little outside of top-billing libertarian purview and more like something between irrelevant and “BOAF SIDEZ!” propaganda piece to me. Do we really expect the Biden Administration to seize control of this process and free these two individuals? Would that be a universal good by libertarian standards? Maybe if he pardoned them on his way out of office it's all kosher (or maybe just kinda kosher given all the other people he and Kackles have locked up similarly) but, otherwise?
How many people have been actually killed by the criminals released by various Social Justice DAs? Is anyone actually counting or do we only care when it’s a Republican governor who actually does grant relatively broad clemency but doesn’t handle each individual case himself?
What the hell is even your point? These people were sentenced under bullshit laws. The fact that the legislature saw fit to roll back those laws means even they recognized them as bullshit. An expedited process to grant clemency to these people should have pushed to apply that clemency as broadly as possible, and it doesn't sound like it did. Without that process it's extremely difficult to get clemency at all.
Since this is purely a state issue, your effort to drag Biden into it is utterly irrelevant. And suggesting only people actually living in TN should care is dumb even by your standards. Injustice doesn't magically become just once you cross a state line.
"Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee..." Note, "Team R" power pig!!!
Der BidenFarter-Fuhrer and His Camel-Toe VEEP are scarcely ANY better on these that them thar drug war issues, sad to say...
VOTE LIBERTARIAN, all of ye who yearn to breathe free!!!
I'm trying to reconcile 300 possible commutations with this:
"Tennessee's drug-free school zones covered huge swaths of urban areas and turned minor drug crimes into mandatory minimum prison sentences that rivaled those for second-degree murder and rape."
So does Tennessee not have a drug problem, are vast numbers of rapists and murderers let out after short sentences or is the author an exaggerating activist?
Just like the rest of the country, TN has a prohibition problem. These people got jacked-up sentences not for the "crimes" they committed but purely for where they committed these so-called crimes. I'm willing to bet that few if any of these cases had anything to do with schools. The deals probably went down in the middle of the night when all the little kiddies were tucked away in bed. (And how many school kids have the disposable income to support much of a drug habit, anyway?) Further, undercover cops have a known history of deliberately setting up buys in these "school zones", since it means giving prosecutors more leverage for guilty pleas or else getting longer sentences so they can brag about how they're TURF on crime.
Why are you so determined to display your ignorance?
A 2017 Reason investigation showed how Tennessee's drug-free school zones covered huge swaths of urban areas and turned minor drug crimes into mandatory minimum prison sentences that rivaled those for second-degree murder and rape.
You don't have to sell me on it, CJ.
He was sentenced in 2015 to a 15-year mandatory minimum prison sentence for selling a small amount of meth to an undercover cop in a drug-free school zone. Potee had become addicted to opioids after a shoulder surgery and was cycling through relapse and recovery. He started selling meth so he could afford Suboxone, an opioid addiction medication.
Y'know, your typical model citizen and productive member of society.
Not two days ago, I said this:
See what I mean? This is precisely what we were talking about a week ago with Dr. Lawhern’s article.
More often than not, the average person cannot be trusted to manage and self-medicate when it comes to pain medication. Self-administration frequently leads to addiction, and addiction frequently leads people to making decisions that they would otherwise NEVER make but for said addiction compelling them feed the beast.
There’s a reason they call it the downward spiral. Every decision starts ending up worse than the previous one.
Reason keeps proving the obvious. But by all means, tell me why I should empathize with the drug-addicted meth dealer canvassing near schools - selling TO feed his addiction - being lockup up in prison where he belongs.
Was he at least reporting his income from his drug sales on his taxes?
Fuck off slaver
Language.
Also, your reply makes no sense.
Also, it seems to defy the Christian Nationalism thing you were advocating and introduced me to the other day. (Super cool by the way. I'm loving it.)
If consenting adults want to buy or sell or use drugs it’s none of your business. If addiction causes them to commit other crimes then jail them for that.
I’ll watch my language if you stop the gay bashing? You won’t though because you’re an unrepentant bigot.
Why are you even on a libertarian website? You obviously aren’t libertarian or care about civil liberties?
If consenting adults want to buy or sell or use drugs it’s none of your business.
You're right. It's not my business. And I don't care.
But tell me the social/cultural value of a drug addict. Tell me how that improves America, to such a degree that you feel compelled to defend it. Better yet, tell me the social/cultural value of a criminal. And not some "fight the power" rebellious sort - because that's clearly not what we're talking about - but just someone who wantonly commits crimes against others. To feed an addiction.
Tell me why I should politely smile and not express concern about or seek remedy for the problems of drug addiction and its derivative criminal behaviors.
Can you do that? Because I don't think you can. In fact, I wholly expect you'll try to pivot and change the subject. Or insult me.
I wonder which it will be.
But tell me the social/cultural value of a drug addict. Tell me how that improves America = slaver logic
See, now there were a couple right answers you could have chosen. For example:
- A drug addict can be rehabilitated (assuming the total absence of drugs) and made a functioning member of society.
- A drug addict can die of his vice and serve as an example and cautionary tale.
- Drug addicts can collect and coalesce in tent cities, flophouses, and sidewalks rocking and churning in their own filth to illustrate the obvious failures of the current social mindset.
Those all have a certain degree of value. But you couldn't fathom that, could you. Because then you'd have to accept the fact that drug addiction is a bad thing. Which you consciously choose not to.
But then I anticipated that, didn't I. Because I knew that about you (or I should say, most folks at Reason) ahead of time. Hence why I expected you to either pivot or insult, and you then went with the latter.
Boring. Predictable. You're not sending your best, Reason.
1 - You should not politely smile and seek remedy for the problems of drug addiction or criminal behaviors. 2 - incarceration is not any kind of remedy for drug addiction. 3 - whether or not you sympathize with drug addicts is irrelevant to the issue of whether they should be incarcerated or not. 4 - whether or not drug addicts commit crimes is irrelevant to whether possession or sale of drugs should be a crime. 5 - it is not my goal to try to ensure that everyone in America has social or cultural value by setting law enforcement officials on them or by trying to impose MY cultural and social values through the power of the law. I will resist and oppose all attempts to impose YOUR cultural and social values through the power of the law. That is the very definition of fascism and my father and both my uncles risked their lives in combat to destroy fascism. You have been warned.
I will resist and oppose all attempts to impose YOUR cultural and social values through the power of the law.
Why? What do you have against them? Do you even know what they are?
No one is defending addiction you mendacious twatwaffle. Even if plenty of people have contributed to society and culture even while addicted. Plus, the majority of users aren't even addicts.
No one is defending the value of crime, either. But real crimes have victims. Claiming that someone is somehow the victim of their own "crimes" is twisting logic into a pretzel. Claiming that someone engaging in mutually voluntary exchange is somehow "committing crimes against others" is as bad or worse.
If you're concerned about addiction and want to help people improve their lives, that's all to the good. But at this point it's pretty firmly established that throwing people in cages and forcing "help" they don't want at gunpoint is not a very effective way to help anyone.
What else should they call someone who wants to lock up "criminals" who hurt no one? As for "trolling" near schools, that's bullshit. First, how many school kids have the income to support a serious drug habit? Second, I'm willing to bet most of these deals went down late at night when the precious kiddies were already tucked away in their beds. Third, it's a common tactic for undercover cops to deliberately set up buys in locations that let them max out sentences (or give prosecutors more leverage for guilty pleas) just so they can look TURF on crime.
No one is defending addiction
If you’re defending drug use and drug accessibility, you’re defending drug addiction. Sorry not sorry, but you cannot pedant your way out of that.
It’s no different than defending cars on the streets. By accepting that, you are accepting that accidents – including fatal ones – will happen. We look at the cost/benefit and deem it an acceptable risk.
But when you look at the cost/benefit of easily accessible addictive drugs – what’s the benefit? What single positive is there from all the life-destroying, crime-motivating, society-collapsing consequences that is the direct result of drug addiction?
If you’re concerned about addiction and want to help people improve their lives, that’s all to the good. But at this point it’s pretty firmly established that throwing people in cages and forcing “help” they don’t want at gunpoint is not a very effective way to help anyone.
Pretty good way of helping everyone else though.
What else should they call someone who wants to lock up “criminals” who hurt no one?
Clown. Give me a break. Seriously, literally, are you an ACTUAL clown?
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/01/06/44/46/18500026/5/1200x0.jpg
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/imageserver/image/methode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F25831218-02a6-11e7-ae09-71f14792998a.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/04/01/4DE7055900000578-5914425-image-a-22_1530662771670.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/10/18/63311381-11299915-image-a-67_1665422231742.jpg
https://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2017_32/2116781/170811-drug-use-nyc-2-ew-1249p_0c4e3c765abe12d6dd0bf2fcbeb78dc1.nbcnews-fp-1200-800.jpg
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2018-05/4/20/asset/buzzfeed-prod-web-05/sub-buzz-31885-1525480894-1.jpg
https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ad_237989921.jpg
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/f8955e9a331601423d0e9b2eb2a38c2e02f41179/c=0-305-5992-3690/local/-/media/2017/04/18/Wilmington/Wilmington/636281208400707636-040517-WIL-PHILLY-HEROIN-JC00557.jpg
https://www.denverpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/opioids-1stld-writethru-13a3e3fc-8216-11e7-ab27-1a21a8e006ab.jpg
Look at them. Look at each and every one. Are you seriously going to sit there, with a straight face – a straight CLOWN face – and tell me that this harms no one?
You are a clown.
Ugh, this stupid comment tree.