Democrats and Republicans Unite To Give Weapons Manufacturers $59 Billion
House Speaker Mike Johnson worked with President Biden to push through a $95 billion foreign military aid package—most of which goes to the American military-industrial complex.

The House of Representatives passed a $95 billion military spending package over the weekend, including $59 billion in weapons purchases in three separate bills. The aid package had been held up because some Republicans opposed more aid to Ukraine. Those concerns melted away after this month's Iranian-Israeli clashes.
The Senate already passed a similar $95 billion package two months ago, so the new House spending bills should pass the Senate and make it to President Joe Biden's desk quickly. The House package also includes a fourth "national security" bill with measures that the Senate has not voted on, including the forced sale of TikTok and new economic sanctions on Iran and Russia.
"Today, members of both parties in the House voted to advance our national security interests and send a clear message about the power of American leadership on the world stage," Biden declared in a statement after the legislation passed.
The White House advertised these bills as an aid package for Ukraine, Israel, and friendly nations in the Indo-Pacific region, such as Taiwan. But the bulk of the money will go directly into the American military-industrial complex. The package includes $29.5 billion to replenish stockpiles of American weapons given to Ukraine, Israel, and Indo-Pacific allies as well as another $29.5 billion for the development, production, and procurement of new weapons.
The wars in Eastern Europe and the Middle East have burned through stockpiles of American ammunition and missiles faster than they can be replaced, and American factories will have trouble keeping up even if more money is thrown at them.
Some non-American weapons manufacturers are also poised to rake in taxpayers' money from the aid package. The U.S. government will spend $5.2 billion on Israel's Iron Dome, Iron Beam, and David's Sling defense systems, produced by an Israeli company, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems. And the Indo-Pacific bill loosens rules for spending Defense Production Act money on British and Australian companies. The United States, Britain, and Australia are working together on the AUKUS submarine project.
Supporters of the aid package have claimed that Ukraine and Israel are fighting so that American troops don't have to. But the bills themselves make it clear how much heavy lifting the U.S. military is already doing in these wars. They include $11.3 billion to support an American military buildup in Europe, and $2.4 billion for American military operations in the Middle East.
U.S. forces have bombed the Houthi movement that is threatening Israeli shipping in the Red Sea, shot down most of the Iranian missiles and drones en route to Israel, and flown surveillance drones over Gaza in order to provide intelligence to the Israeli army.
The United States is at risk of getting dragged further into these conflicts, as the Biden administration has been having trouble controlling its proxies. Israel bombed an Iranian consulate without consulting with Washington, leading to last week's Iranian-Israeli dustup. Meanwhile, Ukraine has refused U.S. calls to stop attacking inside Russian territory.
While pumping money into the wars, the package also provides aid to people that the wars have made homeless. The bills allot around $9 billion to refugee aid and other humanitarian relief, on the condition that none of the money is spent on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, the Palestinian refugee organization that Israel has accused of supporting Hamas. (The agency, for its part, has accused Israel of torturing its employees into confessing alleged Hamas ties.)
And as usual, the spending package includes a hodgepodge of unrelated or only vaguely related items: $98 million for the Department of Energy to produce nuclear isotopes, $250 million for the World Bank's emergency response fund, $75 million for Middle Eastern border agencies fighting drug smuggling, and $390 million for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help nonprofit organizations defend their facilities from terrorism.
The legislative package was designed to prevent either Democratic or Republican dissidents from derailing it. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) broke the aid package apart into three separate bills, then put them back together again after they passed. That way, votes against aid to Ukraine did not count against aid to Israel, and vice versa.
It was a compromise between the Biden administration, which wanted to send Ukraine and Israel aid together, and Republicans, who wanted to vote on aid to Israel separately. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and CIA Director Bill Burns have personally lobbied Johnson over the past two months, according to CNN, as Ukrainian troops have lost ground to Russia.
Johnson appealed heavily to conservative Christian feelings about Israel when trying to sell Republicans on the package. "Of course, for those of us who are believers, it's a Biblical admonition to stand with Israel," he told Newsmax on Friday.
The Ukraine-focused bill passed 311–112, with unanimous Democratic support and some Republican support. Many Democrats cheered and waved Ukrainian flags during the vote. Johnson snapped at them: "We should only wave one flag on the House floor, and I think we know which flag that is."
The Israel-focused bill passed 366–58, with the vote mixed across party lines. Although Democrats have led criticism of Israel's treatment of Palestinians and Republicans have traditionally taken a hawkish pro-Israel line, a few Republicans took a stand against spending taxpayers' money on the Israeli military.
"If Congress wants to send money to Israel, then we should defund the United Nations first," Rep. Matt Gaetz (R–Fla.) said on social media. "I have concerns about all deficit spending when sending money to any country, even if that country is a great ally or under attack."
The libertarian-leaning Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.), who is now supporting an effort to oust Johnson, told Fox News that the military spending package was Johnson's "third betrayal" of his base, after helping pass an omnibus spending bill and reauthorize mass surveillance.
"He's the uniparty speaker now," Massie said.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
.
Competent adults neither advance not accept superstition- (nonsense-) based assertions or positions in reasoned debate among adults, particularly with respect to public affairs.
Slack-jawed, superstitious clingers are unable to resist the temptation to rely on fairy tales.
Suddenly, after thousands of years, we finally find the guy who knows everything
Of course you have to pay for the actions of your government.
Biden coordinated the 2014 coup in Ukraine putting the puppet Jew Zelensky in charge working with the Nazi AZOV battalions which resulted in years of bloody civil war before Russia stepped in.
Biden is funding Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
Not only are American citizens footing the bill but are culpable as willing members of the society responsible for these atrocities.
The following video is the best compilation of evidence to date that proves October 7 was an inside job coordinated by Israel as an excuse to commit genocide in Gaza.
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/new-documentary-on-gaza-october-7
The video proves that Israel, funded, coordinated and enabled the October 7 attacks.
It shows that Israel opened the gate to welcome trucks carrying Hamas through the wall.
It shows how Israel not only ignored repeated warnings from their many surveillance sources but withdrew all defences from the wall and emptied their military bases just hours before the attack and had ZERO response for more than 5 hours.
It shows and proves that the IDF attacked the concert goers and the kibbutz’s with Apache helicopters and tanks.
It shows that they sacrificed dozens of their IDF forces to blame Hamas.
It shows that only handfuls of Hamas soldiers wandered for hours through the evacuated areas looking for soldiers to fight but finding none.
It shows that the hostages that were taken by Hamas said they were treated well.
It shows that Israel has funded Hamas with billions in cash in suitcases in the backs of cars.
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-does-video-show-israel-helicopter-shoot-festival-goers-1842754
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/israel-hamas-misinformation-fueled-ai-images-1234863586/
Two bullshit links that don’t refute the information presented in the video.
In the first, your “fact check” was done by, who else, the IDF! Fact checking by the perpetrators of the genocide who also provide zero proof to support their claims.
The second, simply rambles on about AI fakes, and does nothing to refute the video and testimony.
You obviously want to refute the video but can’t. Try harder.
Refuted.
That was Israel’s moronic response to the ICJ.
It didn’t work for them either, which is why you’re trying it of course.
How many times and people have to refute you before you'll admit it? Seven thousand? Seven million? Seven billion?
Just once will do.
All anyone needs to do is describe exactly how they proved my statement to be wrong, aka refute it, and provide a link to it.
So far nobody, especially you fuckwit hahaha, has ever met that challenge.
They collaborated on 9/11 and now too.
If you think that the reason people are religious is that they are stupid, you will never understand anything.
Oh, they're not stupid. They're just terrified of dealing with the world as it is without the filter of thinking themselves special because a magical sky fairy loves them.
LOL, even Richard Dawkins is having second thoughts now about the utility of eliminating organized religion, and Christianity specifically, from the public square.
And all it took was your slack-jawed, slope-foreheaded hicklib brethren tard-raging constantly to accomplish that.
Richard Dawkins is pretty far left. You really want people to follow his take on things?
“Richard Dawkins is pretty far left.”
Ten years ago, sure.
Now like Bill Maher, Russell Brand, Glenn Greenwald and innumerable others whose views have not eVoLveD in the last decade, he’s a right-wing extremist.
I'm just pointing out how one of the slack-jawed, slope-foreheaded hicklib's anti-Christian allies is re-thinking his stance now that the chickens of his pathological secularism have come home to roost.
“I do not see in religion the mystery of the incarnation so much as the mystery of the social order. It introduces into the thought of heaven an idea of equalization, which saves the rich from being massacred by the poor”
Napoleon Bonaparte --- March 4, 1806
Nobody ever likes to post the whole quote for some reason. It's very strange. I can't imagine why.
"French people, from the heart of a revolution inspired by love of the fatherland, suddenly broke out in your midst, religious dissensions, which became the scourge of your families, the fuel of factions and the hope of your enemies.
A senseless policy attempted to suffocate them under the debris of the altars, under the ruins of religion itself. At his voice, those pious solemnities ceased where the citizens called each other by the sweet name of brothers, and all recognized themselves as equal under the hand of the God who had created them; the dying man, alone with his pain, no longer heard this consoling voice which calls Christians to a better life; and God himself seemed exiled from nature...
The head of the Church weighed in his wisdom and in the interest of the Church the proposals that the interest of the State had dictated; his voice was heard by the pastors; what it approves, the Government has consented to it, and the legislators have made it a law of the Republic. Thus all elements of discord disappear; thus disappear all the scruples which could alarm consciences and all the obstacles which malevolence could oppose to the return of internal peace.
Ministers of a religion of peace, may the deepest forgetfulness cover your dissensions, your misfortunes and your faults; that this religion which unites you, ties you all by the same knots, by indissoluble knots, to the interests of the homeland.
Deploy for her all that your ministry gives you in terms of strength and influence over people's minds; that your lessons and your examples train young citizens to love our institutions, to respect and to be attached to the tutelary authorities who were created to protect them; May they learn from you that the God of peace is also the God of armies, and that he fights with those who defend the independence and freedom of France.
Citizens who profess Protestant religions, the law has also extended its concern to you. May this morality, common to all Christians, this morality so holy, so pure, so fraternal, unite them all in the same love for the homeland, in the same respect for its laws, in the same affection for all the members of the big family.
May doctrinal battles never alter these feelings that religion inspires and commands.
French people, let us all be united for the happiness of the homeland and for the happiness of humanity; that this religion, which civilized Europe, is still the link that brings its inhabitants together, and that the virtues that it requires are always associated with the lights that enlighten us.
As for me, I do not see in religion the mystery of the incarnation, but the mystery of the social order; it attaches to heaven an idea of equality which prevents the rich from being massacred by the poor.
Religion is still a sort of inoculation or vaccine which, by satisfying our love of the marvelous, guarantees us from charlatans and sorcerers; priests are better than the Cagliostros, the Kants and all the dreamers of Germany.
How can you have order in a state without a religion? Society cannot exist without inequality of fortune, and inequality of fortune cannot exist without religion. When a man dies of hunger next to another who is overflowing, it is impossible for him to access this difference if there is not an authority there who tells him: “God wants it this way; there must be poor and rich in the world; but afterwards, and for eternity, the sharing will be done differently.”
Cont...
“…Politicians in general think that they should leave priests aside, not deal with them when they are quiet, and arrest them when they are disruptive. It is as if one were saying: There are men with burning torches around your house; Leave them; if they set it on fire, you will stop them.
See the insolence of the priests, who, in sharing authority with what they call temporal power, reserve for themselves the action on the intelligence, on the noble part of man, and claim to reduce me to have an action only on bodies. They keep the soul and throw the corpse to me.”” – Proclamation [à propos du Concordat]: Paris, le 27 germinal an X (17 avril 1802)
Wee bit different than the cherrypicked part, huh?
Yeah, I see why no one posted that entire dissertation. It's so easy to read and so short.
Maybe get off the digital umbilicus for a while, and you'll be able to concentrate long enough to read something that the average adult had no problem with executing 30 years ago.
You mean like all those Muslim democrats?
They are just as bad as the Christian Republicans. One religion is just as much superstitions nonsense as another.
Probably the best thing you’ve said in years, Nazi.
And you can’t refute it either.
He says this about a literally blank post. Sarc, is that you?
I'd be interested to know how how many votes turned on that superstitious plea.
Well, of course the money is going to defense contractors--they're the ones who make the weapons we need. If anyone can figure out how to obtain the weapons we need without enriching the Military Industrial Congressional Complex, please step up and reveal your plan. (No, outsourcing the production to China is not an option.)
Raytheon is scheduled to produce only 48 Standard Missiles this year. They say that supply chain problems may cause them to miss that goal. The Standard is the missile that is used for missile defense on the Aegis Cruisers and the Burke Class Destroyers. They probably fired off more than 48 during that Iranian attack.
If those weapons were actually going into our stockpiles, you might have a point. But they're just going to get used up in pointless overseas conflicts by foreign militaries.
Pearl Harbor has hopefully instructed America on the fruits of neutrality.
How much of the history do you know here?
We weren’t exactly neutral prior to Pearl Harbor. We had previously (and rightly) condemned the Japanese aggression in China. We had then embargoed the supply of raw materials such as steel and oil to Japan. It was heading for a showdown, and the only pre-Pearl question was where.
Pearl Harbor was a blessing for the US Navy. Over half of the dead came from one ship, the USS Arizona. If the Japanese wouldn't have attacked Pearl, the Battleships there would have gone out to engage their fleet. There would have been the possibility of a battle in deep water far from land. At that time the US Navy was outgunned and outclassed by the Japanese Navy. This could have lead to a higher loss of ships and lives. Those ships would have been lost without hope of salvage. Every ship hit in the Pearl Harbor attack was placed back in service with the exception of two.
When those BBs put out of action ar Pearl Harbor were returned to service, they were no longer front line naval units. They were primarily used to support landing operations because they were too slow to keep up with the CVs and fast BB classes thar had since been commissioned. The Pearl Harvor raid had forced the USN to become a 30 knot force from the 20 knot force it had been much earlier than it would have had Yamamoto left Pearl alone.
Yep, ironically, Yamamoto did us a backhanded favor.
Um.. Fuck You.
My great uncle was at Pearl in the Navy on one of the ships that went down. He lived but never really recovered from the experience.
So, the U.S. had an oil and steel embargo on Japan specifically designed to starve their industrial capacity into submission. Saying "that's what happens when you stay neutral" about Japan's resulting attack on Pearl is just silly.
The arms sales to the allies was the bigger issue since I'd be hard pressed to see how not selling Japan something would be a cause for war.
The Japanese thought differently. Lacking raw materials of their own, the embargo was perceived as a direct threat, especially by the Imperial Japanese Army. That’s why they tasked the IJN with attacking the US somehow.
Pearl Harbor has hopefully instructed America on the fruits of neutrality.
LOL, Pearl Harbor happened because the US was violating its supposed neutrality on both oceans. It gave Lend-Lease aid to the Brits and Commies, and put sanctions on Japan for oil and other resources.
That attack didn’t just happen out of nowhere, and while the intel guys didn’t know exactly when it would take place, there was a clear expectation that it could happen at any time.
And let’s be clear, we’re not helping Ukraine out of some altruistic sense of justice. We’re doing it because the political class doesn’t want to lose its money-laundering site and enjoys antagonizing Russia because Putin, ironically for an ex-KGB officer, doesn't go along with the historic determinism of the western New Left and their neo-Maoist Gen-X and Millennial apparatchiks. All the high-minded rhetoric in the world doesn’t change those facts.
Most felt it was going to be the Philippines first and that Pearl Harbor was to far to launch a raid.
Sure. Because the Japanese hated us for our freedom. Right?
The Japanese hated us for not being Japanese. They were as racist as the KKK.
Business is booming!
https://digital.fidelity.com/prgw/digital/research/sector/detail/industrials
+0.56 % for Aerospace & Defense today, as of right now... Not nothing, but not anything to write home about, either...
"We should only wave one flag on the House floor, and I think we know which flag that is."
People's Republic of China
No, the rainbow pride flag.
Gadsden Flag FTW!
Yay bipartisanship ... ?
But think about all those good-paying Union jobs in the armaments industry.
You ever wonder why Connecticut always has neocon senators?? Because military arms are made in the state.
Can't go wrong buying defense contractor stock.
They're rehearsing for when it comes time to rebuild Ukraine and Gaza.
I have an idea for a new amendment...
"Today, members of both parties in the House voted to advance our national security interests and send a clear message about the power of American leadership on the world stage," Biden repeated almost verbatim from the script he was handed moments before with some corrections from his ear bud voiced by his handler, who was having trouble following the same script, after the legislation passed.
Key phrase "on the world stage." - "As You Like It" Act II Scene VII Line 139, William Shakespeare.
which means those complaining that corrupt governments get this money is a bunch of BS
I think you may be over-assuming the importance of truth to those people.
Meanwhile, since he took office the Biden administration has already cancelled $144 billion in student loan debt. And looking to cancel more debts. Fascinating to see the priorities people set when arguing these things.
The enrichment of the MIC is irrelevant to decisions about defense spending, but that appears to be the main thesis of this article. I think it more reasonable to argue over whether US should be sending aid, and how much and when to stop, based on whether past agreements are still operative, and so on. But I don’t see a lot of articles that attempt to address those issues. I guess it is better to bash purchases of weapons from private businesses who are presumed at fault for the wars their weapons are used in, which is an odd thing to appear without a counterpoint view appearing in what claims to be a libertarian web site.
That's because this isn't a "libertarian web site".
Yup. Because true libertarians are MAGA conservatives. Since the only MAGA conservatives at Reason are in the comments, the commentariat are the only true libertarians at Reason.
So spaketh the One True Libertarian (TM) from upon the mount to the masses huddled below. The OTL then spread his hands over the crowd gathered and told them how holy and godlike they could be if they claim “boaf sidez” on every issue while secretly siding with the one known as The Pedo and the other best known as Lying Jeffy, and not for Joe he reclines.
They know who they are and take great offense. They even hire clowns.
Given the obvious, I'd say you know clowns rather well.
The enrichment of the MIC is irrelevant to decisions about defense spending
I'm not so sure about that. How "private" are these arms businesses really? Look at who runs them. Tons of ex-military and DoD people. Whose interests are really being served by all of these arms sales?
I'm not sure who you think is claiming that the arms companies are at fault for the wars. The fault clearly lies with the people who actually start the wars and the politicians who want to drag us into them.
It's like "private" intelligence companies.
Democrats and Republicans Unite To Give Weapons Manufacturers $59 Billion
Well, as long as we aren't blowing up Houthi Pirates in international waters in clear violation of parts of The Constitution uncited. - Emma Camp
Uhmm. Does Emma Camp ride the short bus? Anti-piracy operations have always been considered a vital mission of the US Navy, and one of the few reasons to maintain a peace time Navy in previous centuries and have never required an act of Congress as anti-piracy is not considered an act of war through most of history.
The US Navy was _created_ to destroy pirates. Yes, ignorance at _Reason_ is positively rife amongst these college graduates.
“Of course, for those of us who are believers, it’s a Biblical admonition to stand with Israel,”
I think I missed that part of the Bible. Can someone help me out?
Chosen people = master race
More of a satanic secret society thing.
I guess it takes one to know one, eh, Misek?
I have refuted any and all idiotic claims that I am a “Nazi”, by issuing the as yet unmet challenge to prove that I either am or advocate National Socialism. None who use that term in a feeble attempt at ad hominem have ever met the challenge.
By demonstrating that those who make the claim have Zero evidence to support it I have met the criteria for the definition of “refuting” the claim.
I refute and ridicule idiots, like you, all the time.
You’ve refuted Jack shit, and Jack’s left town.
Buh bye.
Take off, eh.
Yeah, kind of at a loss there myself. I guess the Jews are gods chosen people, according to them anyway, but my recollection of Jesus is that he wasn't a huge fan of the Jewish establishment.
Fundamentalists who think the Book of Revelations was more than an LSD trip believe that the end times can only come if the Jews control that land. Its their interpretation and they are the tail that wags a lot of the government dog.
The world is watching Jews commit a holocaust in Gaza being funded and armed by most western nations, the “allies”.
Is that why you send your children to serve western military? Is that why your military ancestors gave their lives? Then why do you advocate it?
Square, It is clearly written in Genesis.
God tells Abraham that God will “bless those who bless you”
He further states that he will curse those who curse you
You may have missed that part in bible class
Well, that settles it.
Jews can get away with murder.
Not.
So many deep state grifters slobbering at the feeding trough of the military industrial complex.
Excellent tautology.
The military industrial complex benefitted greatly from World War II. Perhaps we should have simply surrendered the Philippines, Guam, Hawaii, and Alaska to Japan after Pearl Harbor in order to prevent it from benefitting. And similarly told Churchill to surrender the UK and allow Oswald Mosley to take over the government.
To stop genocidal regimes requires weapons. Now during WW2 the US government still had shipyards and armories that manufacturered ships and rifles. Socialism can replace the military industrial complex, but Robert McNamera closed those shipyards and armories, essentially privatizing the MIC completely. Had Henry Wallace won the 1948 election there probably wouldn't have been a MIC nor a NATO, and Europe would have been under Russian domination. Come to think about it, Trump's foreign policy isn't much different.
The war in Ukraine is a regional conflict. It's no different than when Russia invaded Georgia or took over Crimea. We didn't risk WW3 over any of those aggressions. I don't think I need to explain how its different from WW2.
Russia's invasion of Georgia didn't last a month. It ended with a peace treaty. Putin almost certainly expected a similar response from Biden and the world - a favorable deal at the table for the sake of quickly ending the war. He may have even thought Biden would pressure Ukraine into accepting the deal to avoid bloodshed. He's on record as saying that he felt Biden would "understand" his position better than Trump.
Obviously the rest of the world decided to play Napoleon instead. The Trump factor is self explanatory. If they want to forego peace option to keep fighting a proxy war which has a slim chance of victory, then funding the war amounts to nothing more than enriching the industrial military complex.
You do realise that Napoleon was the aggressor, right?
No, that was the Jacobins and every other leftist scumbag in the revolution. Napoleon simply took their ideals to their logical conclusion.
We can spend money now, or spend a whole lot more money and blood later.
History has pretty conclusively shown that appeasement and isolationism doesn't work.
Being pussies just emboldens Russia, China, and Iran, among others. We should be shooting down missiles and planes over Ukraine, just like the Soviets did to us in Viet Nam
The world is watching Jews commit a holocaust in Gaza being funded and armed by most western nations, the “allies”.
We know Biden coordinated the coup in Ukraine and set his son up to collect from corrupt oligarchs.
Is that why you send your children to serve western military? Is that why your military ancestors gave their lives? Then why do you advocate it?
History has pretty conclusively shown that appeasement and isolationism doesn’t work.
History has shown that you need a MASSIVE ramp-up in war materiel, manpower, and logistics long the perceived antagonist even fires a shot at you, if you want to have a hope in hell of actually taking on a near-peer or peer adversary.
The US can’t even get new weapons systems online without going WAY over budget on them, its recruiting figures are in the toilet, and the left has effectively alienated the right to the point that the country’s deep blue shitholes could be turned into powder and most of the rest of the country would breathe a sigh of relief.
Here we see the real, the actual "deep state". These are the people who always get paid, in wartime for preference, but peacetime is just as good. Remember your Airplane: "War's good business so give your son, and I'd rather have my country die for me."
Look, I am openly a religious zealot. I get having religious beliefs.
You know how long the Middle East has been at war? And how long it will be at war? We aren't bringing peace there- we're just throwing money at them.
I think, as a Christian, using Christianity to justify this massive government donation is pretty distasteful. I don't mean to cast aspersions on anyone's beliefs; but I feel like, if this was, say, Namibia, we would still be sending massive amounts of our dough there.