Don't Forget To Claim Drug Dealing Income on Your Taxes
According to IRS guidance, any income derived from illegal activity is taxable, and there's no statute of limitations on when they can go after you.

As just about every American adult knows and is dreading, Monday, April 15, is Tax Day. Each year, taxpayers scrounge together each income statement the government requires and any random receipt that may result in a modest deduction in the amount they're expected to pay.
The IRS wants taxpayers to know that if you made money from anything illegal last year—stealing, selling illegal drugs, taking bribes—then that's taxable, too.
Last year, Americans spent 6.5 billion hours doing their taxes, which translates to roughly $260 billion in lost productivity. That's in addition to the $104 billion they spent in direct costs on the actual tax filing and preparation.
Much of that complexity stems from the amount of deductions and carve-outs the tax law allows, as well as the types of revenue required to be treated as taxable income.
IRS Publication 17 "covers the general rules for filing a federal income tax return." In its most current edition, the IRS advises, "Income from illegal activities, such as money from dealing illegal drugs, must be included in your income on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 8z, or on Schedule C (Form 1040) if from your self-employment activity."
In other words, even if you engage in activity that the federal government is completely opposed to, like selling heroin on the corner, Uncle Sam still expects you to kick up a percentage.
The IRS advisory also includes a section about "stolen property," which similarly cautions, "If you steal property, you must report its fair market value in your income in the year you steal it unless you return it to its rightful owner in the same year."
Returning a stolen item won't prevent you from being prosecuted for theft, so it's nice to know that the IRS will at least give you a pass on the tax implications.
Ultimately, the IRS guidance perfectly sums up how patently absurd so much of the tax code is. In a separate notice, the agency advises filers to "keep records indefinitely if you do not file a return" or "if you file a fraudulent return." That's because if you don't file or if you file a fraudulent return, then there is no statute of limitations, and the IRS could come after you at any point in the future.
The rule goes back to the days of Prohibition: When authorities could not tie gangster Al Capone to any of his illegal dealings—bootlegging, gambling, murder—they prosecuted and convicted him of tax evasion for failing to report his income.
Let that be a lesson to you reprobates out there: If only Capone had reported his racketeering income and kept his tax returns forever, he may have gotten away with it all.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm sure glad that I did not steal any property or make any money from selling illegal drugs last year!
Yeah. No one would do that.
It would be interesting to know if anyone actually reported such income.
Can I claim a loss if it all fell in the water during a tragic boating accident?
If you file a schedule C yes. If the value of your tragically lost inventory exceeds your profit you can take a loss and get a refund on your quarterly payments. You could even get a credit if you have dependents. I'm seeing a real business opportunity here.
Do you have to report it if the revenue went up your nose or in your arm?
Business loss?
Overhead costs.
Returning a stolen item won't prevent you from being prosecuted for theft,
Except if you are joe Biden
/sarcasmic
But also don't forget you can deduct the expenses related to the getaway car, the cost of the safe house, and the fees to your mafia accountant.
As Joe correctly points out, nobody will comply with this rule but that's not the point. It's just another weapon in the DOJ "toolkit" that will allow them to bankrupt and imprison you if they feel like it. Capone went to prison and Bobby Kennedy invented RICO because the DOJ didn't actually have evidence to convict him of an actual crime. Now we all commit 5 felonies a day.
Your 5 felonies a day? Their offensiveness varies according to twat tribe ye belong to! Ass long ass ye worshit Saint BabbShit, all swill be forgiven! Queen Spermy Daniels is WITH us, so do SNOT-TWAT fear, Brothers and Sisters Near and Dear!!! Onwards and upwards, Cumrads!!!
Ye are also required to report your incum from murder-for-hire, Cumrades!!! And just TRUST in the IRS, they will ALWAYS respect yer privacy, and will NEVER report you to the pigs!!!
Jungle Book Kaa, Trust in Me! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJHPfpOnDzg
Some excellent wine, music, SQRLSY One comments... magic. Inexplicably delightful, a perfect stimulation of the mind, soul and body.
Once commenting is a paid feature you will be the biggest jewel in the crown of the reason plus comments section and I'm looking forward to the day your genius will go entirely unopposed and unshackled here. I will forever be lurking in awe.
I wish all comments were of such utterly sublime quality. Reason is doing the right thing.
- your biggest fan
Last year, Americans spent 6.5 billion hours doing their taxes, which translates to roughly $260 billion in lost productivity. That's in addition to the $104 billion they spent in direct costs on the actual tax filing and preparation.
"A small price to pay for living in a civilized society. Anyway, *much* less than the annual deficit!”
Confederates thought chattel slavery was christianizing and civilized. Suddenly along comes 13A with its ban on slavery, paid for in part by the wartime income tax Lysander Spooner criticized. While forcing individuals into unpaid accounting at gunpoint is, like conscription, involuntary servitude, a way was found to pretend otherwise. Income taxing corporations, with their armies of accountants, on the other hand burdens artificial people and not individuals. Repealing the individual income tax is a reasonable first step.
This puts a new twist on that conversation Jesse had with Saul in the nail salon.
Probably best just to avoid the drug trade all together.
The entire federal bureaucracy seems intent on destroying all trades.
Sure, yea - but that's kind of missing the point.
Unless you're talking about antibiotics/ or physician-administered anesthesia or targeted medicine (bronchodilators and antihypertensives and the like) - just don't do drugs. Don't make drugs. Don't sell drugs. Don't get involved with people who do/make/sell drugs. Nothing good ever comes from it.
And nobody likes drug addicts. Nobody.
Nobody.
Does that include alcoholism? Asking for sarc.
Nah. But make sure to remind him that he compares himself to drunks to make himself feel better. That's always good for a laugh.
"And nobody likes drug addicts. Nobody."
Especially those unhinged caffeine fiends!!! That's why we should all join the Moron Church!!! DOWN with unhinged caffeine fiends!!! The TRUE Moron Church can get ye re-hinged; THEY are the TRUE hingers!!! For a mere 10% of yer income!
You know, I didn't really think about them - but yea, they're pretty obnoxious.
Especially the ones who get agitated in the Starbucks line as they impatiently wait for their triple caffeine octo-sugar diabetes shake, or the ones who can't function like a normal, civil human being until they've slugged a Diet Coke before 8:30am.
Ever notice how they're mostly women? Weird right?
Awe-inspiring genius (haven’t read it but it must be, it’s sqrlsy) of a bold, pioneering mind, taking language to aesthetic heights that make me want to have its children or something.
The comments will be so much better once you’re paying to provide us with them. And then it will only be you, the ONE sqrlsy. I can't wait. Reason Plus, accelerate.
– your biggest fan, there’s no amount of air I wouldn’t blow for you
Blow air into a cheap plastic "lung flute", please, butt do NOT forget to get the spermission of a Government Almighty-Blessed Doctor of Doctorology first!
To find precise details on what NOT to do, to avoid the flute police, please see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/DONT_DO_THIS/ … This has been a pubic service, courtesy of the Church of SQRLS!
Due to a high likelihood of April 20th being the current date in six days as of April 14th, we are unable to process your request at this time, as the agency is currently reviewing guidelines that determine the proper airflow direction for lung flutes. We are sorry if that blows.
The republican party LOVES drug addiction, and goes to any length to ban non-addictive, non-toxic drugs with maniacal fanaticism and service pistols. Eliminating competition jacks up the resale price of all that confiscated heroin. Ask anyone in the asset-forfeiture racket.
Speak for yourself.
Comstockist birth-control prohibitionist detected. Not everyone is man enough to kick sand in girls' faces.
Prolly best to avoid prohibitionism--with its coercion at gunpoint--altogether (which is one word).
Nobody said anything about prohibitionism. Look at what I said:
Don’t do drugs.
Don’t make drugs.
Don’t sell drugs.
Don’t get involved with people who do/make/sell drugs.
Nobody likes drug addicts.
There's nothing in there about prohibitionism. However, your response indicates that you are reflexively against one (or all) of those five things on an individual level. Which one(s) is it and why?
Why would I want to keep records indefinitely if I file a fraudulent return? The burden of proof is still on them; why would I want to give them evidence?
If I *don't* file a fraudulent return but the IRS thinks I did, those records may help. But since I have no way of knowing what the IRS will do at some arbitrary future time, that means I have to keep all of my records forever.
I feel like this is a great argument that statutes of limitation are a good thing, by the way. Nobody should have to keep proof of innocence forever. If the government can't figure out within 10 years that someone cheated on their taxes, I'm OK with them getting away with it.
All my records were lost in a tragedy boating accident.
"The burden of proof is still on them; why would I want to give them evidence?"
It is quaint that you think "innocent until proven guilty" applies to tax evasion charges.
Tax enforcement is treated as an exception to Constitutional criminal law protections, which is why Roberts saved ACA with the "penaltax".
When I first had to file a tax return the simplest form was the 1040.
I remember there being a line to report income from gambling or other illegal activities.
What if I just "find" money in the trunk of my car?
You mean like Fani?
The wonders of an economy that's driven by boating accidents and car trunk discoveries.
THE + IRS = THEIRS
Chapeau.
European stock exchanges dropped in May 1927 when Suprema Court declared Beer and coke dealers liable to income tax. The US got Germany to sign an extradition agreement in 1930. League of Nations bureaucrats met to plan a dope limitation convention in May 1931. The day Al Capone was indicted, Herb Hoover offered Germany the Moratorium on Brains (carrot) to sign the "Narcotics" Limitation Convention (stick) with Capone tax charges in headlines. Germany was hit by banking panics, depression, and suddenly Big Pharma began funding Hitler's election campaign.
I sometimes tell a long, shaggy dog story about a classmate in law school who was late getting to our Income Tax 2 class. The professor was asking a long hypothetical question as the student entered. The question was going on and on as the student was getting set up for class - taking off his coat, getting his books out, getting his note paper out.
The student finally gets finished just as the professor finishes the hypothetical question....and he calls on that student (who was obviously not paying attention to the details of the question). The student got to his feet and in a loud voice said, "Include in gross income."
That is the government's approach to tax controversies. When in doubt, "Include in gross income."
6.5 billion hours for like 213 million returns filed. That's an average of 30 hours. Report says 6.5 billion hours is an estimate. I kinda believe it.
Hmm. I thought that requiring taxes to be filed on illegal activities was already declared unconstitutional on self-incrimination grounds. It's a big reason why the marihuana tax act was repealed and replaced with something even worse. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leary_v._United_States
I think I remember hearing that the Federal Tax on illegal drugs was 100%. If I'm correct, what's to stop the IRS from applying that rate to businesses that sell MJ in States that have legalized it?
See my link above. Taxes on illegal drugs can't be enforced. This is about income tax. Income from drugs would be taxed at the same rate as other self-employment income presumably.