Brickbats: May 2024
News of politicians, police, and bureaucrats behaving badly from around the world.

Michael Cassidy was charged with criminal mischief after destroying a Baphomet altar erected by the Satanic Temple of Iowa in the state capitol in 2023. Since Cassidy "destroyed the property because of the victim's religion," they tacked on a hate crime enhancement, increasing the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and up to $10,245 in fines.

For three years, the Bond family requested permission to remove two trees on their property that they thought looked dangerous. But the Portland, Oregon, Urban Forestry Commission denied their requests, saying it would "significantly affect neighborhood character." Then during a storm, one of those trees fell onto the Bonds' home, forcing them out. A city arborist advised the family that they will have to apply for a permit to remove the remains of the tree and pay to have a tree planted to replace it. They were also advised to remove the second tree from their property and apply for a retroactive permit, but if that permit is denied, they could be fined for removing the tree.
Christina Lea Gilchrist is a Canadian sex worker who offers a 25 percent discount to customers in the military. Although her sex work is legal, the military claims that her ads—which depict Gilchrist in uniform—are illegal. As a result, she says Canadian military police threatened to press charges against her and warned soldiers not to use her services.

Former Miami-Dade School Board Vice Chair Lubby Navarro faces charges of fraud and grand theft. Prosecutors say she used her school system credit cards to make $100,000 in illegal purchases, including two fake pregnancy bellies that she used to try to convince her ex-boyfriend she was pregnant with his child.
Video showed reporter David Menzies approaching Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland with a microphone and walking alongside her on a public sidewalk, asking questions about government policy. Menzies seemingly bumped into a police officer who stepped into his path; that officer then shoved Menzies against a wall and told him he was under arrest for assault. Ontario police later dropped the charges, saying "no credible security threat existed."
A jury convicted former House of Representatives of Puerto Rico member María Milagros "Tata" Charbonier of conspiracy, bribery, and money laundering, among other charges. While in office, Charbonier increased her assistant's biweekly pay from $800 to between $2,100 and $2,900. But the assistant kicked back between $1,000 and $1,500 of each paycheck to Charbonier, her husband, and their son.

Atlanta developer Jeff Raw had a water meter installed on a vacant lot he owned. Over the next five months, he received bills totaling nearly $30,000. A city inspector verified there were no water lines or leaks on the site and the utility sent Raw an email admitting there was a leak in its part of the system, but officials still insisted he pay those bills.
Before taking her oath of Canadian citizenship, Maria Kartasheva learned she had been tried in absentia in Russia, her home country, and found guilty of "public dissemination of deliberately false information" for social media posts she made while living in Canada opposing the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Canada has a similar law, and those charged with an offense that would be a crime in Canada may be denied citizenship. After several media outlets picked up her story, the government agreed to let Kartasheva become a citizen after all.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I see how you smuggled the logo of HATE in there.
Hate crime charge (and penalty) enhancements are but one of the several reasons why it is important that the jury hearing the case remember that there are two, not one, responsibilities of citizens serving on a jury, and the jury itself. Both of these involve protection of citizens.
(1) protect the citizens of the state against the depredations of the predators among them, by returning a verdict of guilty when crime involving a victim has been committed by the individual charged and creditable evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and
(2) protect the citizens from the state by returning a verdict of not guilty (or in the case of an individual, hanging the jury) when abuse of prosecutorial power/discretion is apparent, the penalty for the crime charged is unconscionable (yes I know, the jury is not supposed to know the penalty when judging guilt or innocence), or when a finding of guilty would be manifestly unjust.
JURY NULLIFICATION: Learn it. Live it. Do it when necessary. Never admit it. Do not post about it while you remain “of age” to serve on a jury. Lie about it during voir dire – one is not honor bound when dealing with or enmeshed in a system that is totally lacking in honor and often in basic honesty, and from which justice, when it emerges, is as likely to be a fortuitous by-product as to be the primary product.
This should include jury service in a civil tort trial when the circumstances of the tort are questionable or the action of the defendant perhaps justifiable, or the demand for damages is unreasonable. A loser pays system, never to be seen in this attorney dominated society, would solve the problems of the victims of the lawsuit-happy. Would any reader of this comment really argue that our criminal or civil court system now functions to protect the innocent, punish the guilty, make the damaged whole, protect from legal extortion, or seek the whole truth in process?
These are twice as funny with the Peter Bagge cartoons. John Trevor, who used to cartoon for Reason, still does an occasional drawing over at Albuquerque Journal in the Libertarian State of New Mexico.
On that citizenship Catch-22, the primary point of forcing EVERYONE into beer, abortion or book bans is to avoid financial collapse because money flees superstitious coercion. A secondary worry is brain-drain. Nixon's USA marketed heroin in its rush to bully other kleptocracies to ban harmless psychedelics. This raised that same barrier against Americans moving (and retiring) elsewhere. Weed bans were colonial India's idea to increase opium addiction and attendant profits. That was imported by Anslinger circa 1936. The entire Southern Command is an extension of the DEA the way the Marines were of United Fruit. Anyone busted for twigs and seeds in Bolivia in 1970 is inadmissible to These States, and vice-versa.