Study: Social Media Don't Displace In-Person Hangouts for Teens
Teens who use social media heavily also spend the most in-person time with friends.

A new study strikes a blow to the idea that teenage social media use is obliterating in-person time with friends. According to the new research, published in Computers in Human Behavior, teens who spend a lot of time on social media will also log the most in-person socialization time. Futhermore, the researchers "found no support for the assumption that social media use predicts declines in social skills."
On some level, this isn't surprising. Social teens are social teens, no matter the medium.
But it's fashionable today to blame smartphones for depression and anxiety in teens, and a prominent theory of how this works is that social media crowd out unmediated activities, such as hanging out in person. The new study suggests this theory may miss the mark.
You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.
More Social Media, More Offline Socializing
The research was conducted by an international team of academics that included professors at Brown University, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, the Amsterdam School of Communication Research, and St. Olavs University Hospital. For the study, they collected biennial data about social media use, social skills, and time spent with friends for hundreds of Norwegian children. This information was measured when the kids were ages 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18.
"More time spent with offline friends was concurrently associated with greater social media use at ages 10, 12, and 14 years," report the researchers.
In addition, increased use of social media "positively predicted time spent with friends offline" in the future: "participants who liked, commented, and posted more over time displayed an increase in the number of days they spent with friends offline."
The effects were small but significant, and applied across sexes and age groups.
So contrary to conventional wisdom, teens who start spending more time on social media aren't largely doing it to the exclusion of in-person socializing.
Nor does spending more time on social media seem to make social skills worse. "Increased use of social media was unrelated to future levels of social skills across ages 10–18 years," states the study.
"Our findings…provide preliminary evidence that concern over declining social skills as a result of social media use may be unwarranted," the researchers conclude. "Social media use may even support offline interaction with friends, and thus indirectly promote adolescents' wellbeing and functioning."
No One-Size-Fits-All Script
Increased social media use did predict a decline in social skills among people who already scored high on social anxiety, though the effect was small and only applied to those between ages 12 and 16.
The findings "align with prior research supporting a poor-get-poorer (i.e., rich-get-richer) hypothesis," the researchers explain.
This is interesting because it points to a wider conundrum when it comes to studies of social media use and teen mental health.
Some previous research has shown higher levels of social media use or screen time are correlated with higher levels of mental health problems. A lot of people like to interpret these studies as evidence that social media causes mental problems in teens. But causation could go the other way: Teens suffering from mental health issues, bullying at school, etc. could start using social media more heavily to cope with offline stress.
Maybe online communities actually help troubled teens deal better with their offline stressors. Or maybe there's a circular reinforcement effect going on, with offline troubles leading to more time online and that, in turn, leading to more isolation and negative emotions or behaviors. We just don't know. It's likely different for different teens, depending on their particular circumstances.
This new study serves as an important reminder of this variance. There's no one-size-fits-all script for social media use among teens—which means we should also avoid one-size-fits-all solutions.
For teens who are social and well-adjusted already, social media use may become a fun extension of their in-person social life or spur new friendships that then translate to offline spaces. But for some teens who are already suffering from anxiety or other issues, social media use could prove problematic, exacerbating offline issues.
This is why catchall rules—like laws banning minors from social media use—are both unnecessary and unwise. Such policies could prove helpful to some teens, of no consequence to others, and harmful to still others. That's why the people best positioned to understand the way a particular teenager relates to social media, and to set more boundaries should problems arise, are that teen's parents or other adults close to them, not distant lawmakers looking for blanket solutions.
More Sex & Tech News
• The battle over warrantless federal surveillance is hot again.
• So this has to be a bit, right? Comedian Brinan Weeks has filed a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer of the Fleshlight sex toy. Weeks is accusing the company of negligent misrepresentation and unfair and deceptive practices after failing to see improvement in his "sexual performance or stamina" after using it.
• A federal court ruled against X in a lawsuit it brought against the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
Today's Image
I recently came across my senior photo—and since today's newsletter is all about teens, I'll share it with you. Why they had me pose like I'm about to flash somebody in an alley, I don't know. What I do know is that coat came from the Delia's catalogue, I still own it, and it's held up astonishingly well.

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Do brothels count as teen hang-outs?
Sure! Maybe ENB can lobby for a grant program to get more teens into sex work. Perhaps she can get Biden to unilaterally issue grants to active sex workers so underage girls can shadow them while they turn tricks.
Social Media Don't Displace In-Person Hangouts for Teens
Doesn’t sound like good word choice.
Agreed. "Don't" is a bad choice. "Doesn't" would be a better choice. Maybe there is some joke in that choice I am not aware of, I don't use social media.
Apparently, “Social Media” are plural.
Yeah, it's technically correct although like plenty of things in the English language what is technically correct often sounds wrong.
I'm sure Jonathan Affleck can post a diatribe ... I mean explanation ... about it.
Oh, now that makes sense. Media is a funny word, it is a plural because it is about multiple sources even though it doesn't have the typical endings.
Media is the plural of medium. "Social media" and even just "the media" are plural nouns.
It would be correct to say "Facebook doesn't ..." or "X doesn't ..." but "social media (which comprises both of them) don't ..."
“The media don’t” still sounds wrong to me. But I still have this issue with “data”, too.
I consider the words media and data as collections, so I use the singular:
"The data is conclusive that the media sucks".
My favorite part is that people keep saying “media is the plural” like the various mediums of paper, radio waves, and TCP/IP packets are what would be doing the displacing and that the sentence shouldn’t be more along the lines of “Social media participation or engagement doesn’t displace…”
Also the word "unionized" is pronounced "uhn-eye-oh-nized", not "yoon-yunized".
Social Media Don’t Displace In-Person Hangouts for Teens
"Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg are not, themselves, tossing teens out of physical hangout spaces." is correct, I suppose.
Social Mediums Don’t Displace In-Person Hangouts for Teens. The spirits let them know to leave before the kids show up and block their… energies.
So, kids who are fucked up by their parents when very young remain fucked up and use social media in fucked up ways to avoid in person hang out time.
Kids who aren't fucked up by their parents when very young remain not fucked up and use social media to arrange in person hang out time.
Gee, who'd of thought?
Oh, right. Parents who fuck their kids up wouldn't think of it. They need something other than themselves to blame for why their kids are fucked up wanna be school shooters.
This study seems like it's not exactly addressing the claim. If you're looking strictly at one generation, you're not going to get a lot of insight as to how that generation compares with other generations. Specifically, if you want to know if social media use is crowding out in-person communication, noting the most socially active in-person are also the most socially active online doesn't tell you much. As even Nolan-Brown points out, that just tells you who are the most socially active. What you'd be interested in is how the socially active (and everyone else) today compare to the socially active (and everyone else) previously in terms of in-person time.
It's probably difficult, due to the very short existence of social media.
Where is Aaron the stats guy to go over this study? Reason loves to bring him out to trash the shit out of any study they disagree with, but he never gets called in to do the same type of review to studies they agree with.
It’s the Reason way.
Why would a Leftist trash junk science touted by Leftists?
I can't believe over two hours has passed and I am first to respond to the obvious troll.
"Why they had me post like I'm about to flash somebody in an alley, I don't know."
(assumption: post = pose)
Well, it did turn out to be prophetic.
ENB is younger than me?
Aye mío
OMG they studied Norwegian kids! That explains everything.
“Social media use may even support offline interaction with friends”
Social media is a form of communication. It makes sense that improving your communication skills would also help your interactions in person. Also, it seems to me that a wide range of contacts on social media would help you find friends who have common interests and direct your interactions in person to more interesting activities.
I get what you’re saying in general. But Texting and comment boxes are also one of the most weird and stunted forms of communication in that a lot of subtle inflections are lost or clunky (think emojis). And there’s just something weird about shit you blurt out as an after thought being around forever.
It’s also often as not a form of communication used to get out of using more personal forms of communication. Often we text so we don’t have to interact on a phone or such. And there’s the whole way we talk to strangers online that we’d never use talking to someone in person (unless we wanted daily fistfights/gun battles).
But it's fashionable today to blame smartphones for depression and anxiety in teens
It's "fashionable" because it's accurate.
I’m sick of Nolan Brown constantly arguing for tech. I’m not saying we need laws to protect children, but please stop arguing that it’s a good thing. I’m a mother of four, three were able to navigate an abusive relationship with tech, one has not been able to. Is she making the argument that 75% of kids are only slightly harmed, who cares? They should have been tougher? Sounds like bullying to me. By the richest, smartest adults in the world.
Look at the source of the "study".
I wonder if he took into consideration that kids ages 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 do the extreme majority of their social interaction in school.
Jonathan Haidt wants Washington to ban kids from social media because he thinks it is making kids mental. So disappointed that he wants to be a man of system.