Kansas Police Facing Lawsuit After Conducting 'Illegal' Raid Against Small-Town Paper
Last year, the offices of the Marion County Record were raided by police. A new lawsuit claims the search was illegal retaliation against the paper.

Last year, Kansas police raided the offices of a small local newspaper, seizing computers, the newspaper's file server, and even personal cellphones. Police also raided the home of the newspaper's owners, Eric and Joan Meyer.
On Monday, one of the paper's owners filed a lawsuit against the police, arguing that the raids clearly violated the First and Fourth Amendments—and even led directly to the stress-induced death of the paper's 98-year-old co-owner.
"No probable cause, nor even arguable probable cause, existed to issue the search warrants for the Marion County Record newsroom and the home of Joan and Eric Meyer," the lawsuit reads. "And no reasonable police officer could have believed there was probable cause to issue the search warrants."
On August 11th, 2023, police in Marion, Kansas—a small town of less than 2,000 people—raided the offices of the Marion County Record. According to the complaint, police seized computers and other property from the offices, and forced staff to stand outside during the raid, even as the temperature neared 100 degrees. Officers attempted to question newspaper staff, but body camera footage shows them struggling to remember the Miranda warning.
After searching the Record's offices, police went to the home of Eric and Joan Meyer, the paper's owners. Eric, who co-owned the paper with his mother, 98-year-old Joan, objected to the search. When Eric attempted to call his attorney on his cell phone, police demanded Eric hand over his phone.
In body camera footage, Eric claims that the search is retaliation by the Sheriff, Gideon Cody. "You're going to get a suit back against false search. You understand that?" he said. "Do you understand that Officer Cody, who filled this out; we have a whole bunch of damaging information about him we have not published. He is aware of this and this is retaliation by Chief Cody…it is impermissible to seize the electronic devices of a journalist doing work as a journalist. That's what this is about."
Police stayed at the Meyer's home for several hours, during which Joan Meyer became increasingly upset. "I may be ninety-some years old, but I know what's going on. And what's going on is illegal as hell," she said. "You know, if I have a heart attack and die, it's going to be all your fault."
Joan died the next day from a cardiac arrest due to "the stress of the illegal raid," according to the complaint.
Why did the police conduct this raid? The answer is complex and goes back to a dispute between the paper and a local restaurant owner, Kari Newell. According to the complaint, the Recorder received an anonymous tip alleging that Newell had been involved in a drunk driving incident, and that law enforcement knew Newell was driving without a valid license, yet continued to let her do so. While the Record decided not to publish this information, Eric did inform law enforcement about the allegations.
The situation came to a head when Newell accused the paper during a public meeting of illegally obtaining information about her. The Record ran an article about the incident after the meeting. Four days later, police raided the Record's offices, and the Meyers' home.
According to the suit, Cody, as well as the town's mayor David Mayfield, had been looking for a reason to crack down on the paper. "Mayor Mayfield had vowed to "silence the MCR" and Chief Cody had offered to fund a competing newspaper in an effort to put the Record out of business," the suit states.
While the suit alleges obvious misconduct on the part of Marion police, it's unclear whether Meyer has any chance of seeing compensation for the illegal raids—as police are generally protected from civil suits like these due to wide-ranging qualified immunity.
"Chief Cody's actions in seeking the search warrants for the Record's newsroom and the Meyer home, in making false statements in the applications for the search warrants, as well as his actions in executing the illegal search warrants, were motivated by his desire to seek retribution against the Record and its owners," the complaint adds. "Defendants acted maliciously and wantonly in violating the First Amendment rights of the Marion County Record and Joan and Eric Meyer."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"but body camera footage shows them struggling to remember the Miranda warning."
You have the right to remain silent...anything you...uhhh. Fuck it, book -em, Dano!
It's four declamatory sentences, followed by a question for a total of 57 words.
I was going to make a joke about how it's not some big city either so they probably don't get a lot of the whole "You're violating my 1A rights by arresting and mirandizing me!" idiocy but every aspect of this case continually comes across as Springfield-esque to me.
Hick town in a hick state. Likely more left-handed redheads than college graduates. Poorly trained, inexperienced police with bad temperament. A citizen with legal problems she wanted to hide but plenty of friends in positions of authority. Be a stupid town, win stupid prizes.
Well you should understand that. Be a stupid , ignorant Marxist and win stupid, ignorant Marxist prizes.
Likely not, the 2020 US Census shows 27.5% of the Marion population age 25+ has a bachelor’s degree or higher.
Qualified Immunity! How were the police to know about freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right against unreasonable searches and seizures? It's not those liberties are clearly established. [/sarc]
Sounds like time for a new city government.
Yeah. I keep forgetting this case is 100% “Everyone is assholes” all the way down and that, it seems, would be best suited to something more along the lines of the police chief gets dismissed, maybe the vice-mayor steps down, and The Record drops the case.
Rather than going in front of SCOTUS with a 1A case that starts off with something like testimony from Newell saying “Well, you see, I lost my license after a DUI and my ex-husband found out that I might be getting it back…”
Newspaper weren't assholes, they were doing their jobs. This both sidesing is ridiculous, but I've grown to expect it from the MAGAs, but not from reason readers.
Please define "the MAGAs" in this context.
Newspaper weren’t assholes, they were doing their jobs.
And I've come to expect "Reporting people's DUI issues to the
publicvice-Mayor is the newspaper's job." from leftists.In practice, does the subject of a warrant ever get a chance to read the warrant before the police start the search? Or even get a look at it?
led directly to the stress-induced death of the paper's 98-year-old co-owner
I'm borderline sympathetic to the case. It does seem like a 1A violation, but it's a podunk town and while Newell's allegation that the paper or controlling interests illegally attained information on her, there is precisely zero explanation given as to the veracity of the claims.
All that said, the idea of making anything that may sufficiently stress a 98 yr. old to death legally actionable for anyone up to and including LEOs sounds insane. Much less lumping that in with a 1A protection case.
Know who else was just following orders?
SPB2?
Jesse when he gets his Trump.com fan email every morning?
"...as police are generally protected from civil suits like these due to wide-ranging qualified immunity."
TRANSLATION: The cops can break any law they want and get away with it.
"Chief Cody had offered to fund a competing newspaper in an effort to put the Record out of business . . ."
In retrospect, this initial idea would likely have been not only less expensive, but a lot less illegal.
From Bleeding Kansas to Bloody Kansas in 160 years. I mistakenly entered Kansas while hitching from Austin to Golden, Colorado during college vacations. It was like being beamed down into actual Nazi Germany, except the SS spoke English.
So what was Kansas like back in the 1920’s Hank?
I'm guessing it was somewhere between the beginning of Wizard of Oz and the beginning of the Grapes of Wrath when he rolled through.
You had to go quite a bit out of your way if you passed through Kansas on your way from Austin, TX to Golden, CO.
Driver: "Where you headed, son?"
Hitchhiker: "Golden, Colorado."
D: "?"
H: "Denver."
D: "I'm going to Topeka."
H: "OK, as long as it's outta here."
Hitchhiking through Kansas to get from Texas to Colorado seems reasonable to me. I think a straight line drawn from Austin to Denver would either cut through the Oklahoma Panhandle or a corner of New Mexico, missing Kansas. But the Panhandle area is kind of desolate, and I can't think of any roads around there that run northwest. If I had to drive Austin to Golden and wanted to avoid Kansas, I'd head for either Oklahoma City or Amarillo, then take I-40 across half of New Mexico and I-25 north over the Raton Pass. Since hitchhiking is banned on the interstates, you'd be looking for blue-line highways, and I think you'd be more likely to find one going the right way a little further east - that is, in Kansas.
Here’s the real problem which doesn’t even seem to even be mentioned in this article: the police conducting the raid apparently had a search warrant; some Magistrate must have issued that search warrant; it’s the Magistrate’s responsibility to verify not only the facts alleged in the affidavit, but the Constitutionality of the search itself BEFORE issuing a search warrant. The entire “due process” of rubber-stamping fraudulent and boilerplate affidavits for search warrants has become a (not very funny) JOKE and Reason has documented DOZENS of violations of due process at all levels of government across the entire nation for DECADES with no significant reforms or consequences for incompetent Magistrates. THAT is THE PROBLEM!
A recent list could include the Feds violating the terms of the search warrant issued for safety deposit boxes in Los Angeles; and the issuing of a no-knock search warrant in Houston by a truly worthless Magistrate to a drug warrior who had never once actually produced the guns alleged in his boilerplate affidavits in hundreds of searches before killing two innocent residents in Pecan Park in 2019.