Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Hate Speech

Will J.K. Rowling Do Time?

Plus: Mnuchin's TikTok folly, Trump's April Fools' joke, Andy Warhol's muse, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 4.2.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
"Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling | Fred Duval/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
(Fred Duval/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

Deliberately defiant: Yesterday, new hate speech laws went into effect in Scotland that, if enforced, will effectively stifle all types of dissent from woke orthodoxy—and could land Harry Potter creator and prominent feminist J.K. Rowling in jail.

Passed in 2021, the law cracks down on "stirring up hatred" and enshrines all kinds of new minority-group protections in law. "Transgender identity" is explicitly named in the bill (whereas gender is not). The law seems likely to have speech-chilling effects, as conviction of an offense could result in up to seven years in prison.

Rowling took to X (formerly Twitter) with a thread calling attention to how women receive no additional legal protections, but transgender activists—some of whom use violent and threatening rhetoric—do:

Scotland's Hate Crime Act comes into effect today. Women gain no additional protections, of course, but well-known trans activist Beth Douglas, darling of prominent Scottish politicians, falls within a protected category. Phew! 1/11 pic.twitter.com/gCKGwdjr5m

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) April 1, 2024

Rowling has long been a critic of transgender activists' ideologies, specifically claims that one's natal sex can be changed, as well as the contention that those who have transitioned deserve full access to bathrooms, changing rooms, competitions, and other single-sex spaces. "In passing the Scottish Hate Crime Act, Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls," wrote Rowling.

"The new legislation is wide open to abuse by activists who wish to silence those of us speaking out about the dangers of eliminating women's and girls' single-sex spaces, the nonsense made of crime data if violent and sexual assaults committed by men are recorded as female crimes, the grotesque unfairness of allowing males to compete in female sports, the injustice of women's jobs, honours and opportunities being taken by trans-identified men, and the reality and immutability of biological sex," she continued. "Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal."

She ended her critique with a bit of a taunt: "I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment." (More here.)

Conspicuous absence: "The Scottish government has contrived to create a bill which affords greater status and protection to men who cross-dress than it does to actual women," writes Alex Massie for The Sunday Times. "Being a woman is not a 'protected characteristic' and while I doubt this bill is necessary at all, it seems remarkable that those who think it is did not consider women a category worth including within its remit."

The Scottish Police Federation (SPF), a staff association that represents law enforcement, is opposed to the very law its members will be tasked with enforcing. "Hate crime is an increasingly fluid term with ever increasing sections of society demanding special status for their particular group," the SPF writes in a press release.

"The SPF is further concerned that the Bill would move even further from policing
(and criminalising) of deeds and acts to the potential policing of what people
think or feel, as well as the criminalisation of what is said in private."

Rowling has said before that she would rather do prison time than be compelled by the government or activist mobs to affirm something she believes is profoundly untrue. Unfortunately, this conviction may be put to the test.

Your next Zuck: As previously reported here, former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has been telling possible investors that he's interested in buying TikTok if the U.S. government forces the Chinese owners, ByteDance, to sell (vs. facing a total ban). But ByteDance has dug its heels in and said the app will be stripped of its algorithm. So big-brained Mnuchin has started to talk about how he'll just…rebuild the algorithm, no big deal.

But "the idea is so far-fetched that it suggests a lack of familiarity with how tech companies work," reports The Washington Post. "TikTok users flocked to the app because of its surprising suggestions for videos they might like to watch, and there's no guarantee any Mnuchin-driven version could duplicate that success—or beat rivals like Meta and Google, which have worked for years to mirror the experience within their own respective apps, Instagram and YouTube."

So, Mnuchin would have to assemble a team to not only secure funds to buy the app, but also to rebuild its algorithm from scratch. And all over the course of six months, as Congress has set a divestiture deadline after which the app will be banned if legislation passes.

All this, according to Pirate Wires' Mike Solana, "provide[s] another helpful indication of Washington's view of tech: a bunch of lucky idiots with too much wealth and power, all of which the swamp creatures want."


Scenes from New York: A New York Times investigation of the city's 38 specialized homeless shelters, by the numbers, over a four-year period:

  • 50 deaths, half from overdoses
  • 1,400 fights (with half resulting in "serious injury")
  • 40 fires (half of which were set on purpose)
  • Over 40 rapes/attempted rapes/sexual assaults

The shelters, in total, cost about $260 million annually.


QUICK HITS

  • I kinda love that Donald Trump pretended he was suspending his campaign for April Fools'.
  • California may be liberalizing its assisted-suicide laws, following the controversial Canadian playbook. "Introduced in March by a first-term lawmaker—an attorney with a background in estate planning—the proposal would enable people without a specific terminal prognosis to request life-ending drugs, a lower threshold than any of the other 10 states that currently allow some form of aid-in-dying," reports Politico.
  • The first full-length biography out of Andy Warhol muse Candy Darling, mentioned in Lou Reed's "Walk on the Wild Side."
  • Stupid headline alert: "Big Banks are 'quiet quitting' their climate promises," from Bloomberg. Not only is "quiet quitting" a dumb turn of phrase that won't stand the test of time, but also, the big banks were always trying to placate and never going to actually follow through on climate-related demands.
  • "Iran vowed revenge on Israel after blaming it for a deadly air strike on its embassy in Syria," reports Bloomberg, describing Iran's move as "a rare confrontation in the adversaries' escalating proxy conflict over the war in Gaza."
  • San Francisco assemblyman tries to make after-hours work emails illegal, as if that's any of his business whatsoever.
  • National Organization for Women seems to be pretty anti-woman:

Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work. Making people believe there isn't enough space for trans women in sports is white supremacist patriarchy at work. https://t.co/SacFuIgpPd

— National NOW (@NationalNOW) March 31, 2024

  • Los Angeles lore:

For 40 years, the Los Angeles mandated that every new high-rise install a helicopter pad on the roof on the basis of fire safety. The theory? A helicopter might land on a burning building and evacuate occupants. pic.twitter.com/0MsEKi5VN8

— M. Nolan Gray (@mnolangray) April 1, 2024

  • This should not catch on:

It is April 1st. Please tell me the #defund police crowd isn't now trying to categorize "burglary and breaking and entering" as "quality-of-life concerns."

This is how they get you: adding a bit of batshit crazy at a time, to what is a otherwise normal concept. https://t.co/zNkFQQksZH pic.twitter.com/65WomUHhkN

— Peter Moskos (@PeterMoskos) April 2, 2024

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Birth of a YIMBY Folk Hero

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Hate SpeechHate crimesFree SpeechScotlandJ.K. RowlingHarry PotterTikTokChinaFeminismPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (359)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...and could land Harry Potter creator and prominent feminist J.K. Rowling in jail.

    This is what happens when you let the muggles assume too much power.

    1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      These songs popularized by Jim Stafford are going to be real problematic in the Scottish People's Republic. Assuming the gender is a'poppin' with these ditties!

      The Drunk Scotsman
      https://youtu.be/MZ35SOU9HTM?si=mfwDZjGWg599V37O
      🙂
      😉
      Jim Staffard--My Girl Bill
      https://youtu.be/yHGV3PhEg5c?si=jjdTWPQ2-F7Hu9Uy
      🙂
      😉

      Let's hope the Scots blast these songs on the bagpipe and boom-box and that this law and the ones who passed it get laughed out of the bonny crags and moors of Scotland!

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Not sure where this one falls on the ever evolving hate speech continuum.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FshU58nI0Ts

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          Damn! I didn't think of that one! You are so right!

          And since the whole troupe went in drag at one time or another, the whole Monty Python franchise could be legally up for grabs depending on who gets to the courthouse first! Will some Transgendered person say that cis people going in drag is "Trans-face" and "stirring up hatred?"

          Nothing good can come of this for anybody.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            And, of course, one of the protected classes is "religion or, in the case of a social or cultural group, perceived religious affiliation."

            Take it from one who knows, the mildest, most logical criticism of religion or even Theocratic practices can be and is conflated by Believers with hateful Totalitarianism, so religious criticism could be fair game for prosecution.

            The Kinks may soon be singing: "There's no England or Scotland now."

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              Mild? I don't think you know what that word means. Your criticism of any religion is pretty virulent at times, bordering on KAR territory. Also, how did I know you'd work religion into the debate?

            2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              Also, the other day, I should have bookmarked it, you basically stated that religion has never done any good and only bad. You consider that mild?;

            3. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   1 year ago

              What about "Low Budget"
              I thought you said that

            4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

              Ok then….. head on over across the pond and stand on a soapbox criticizing religion. Then go across the street and make fun of trannies.

              Then report back.

        2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tHxf17yJsKs

          1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

            I was 90% sure this was going to be the clip

            Also it's super offensive, as it features people that attack the nature god

            1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

              If there were ever an awards show for best hate speech that would have to rate at least top three.

              1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

                It's not a hate speech. He frankly says he does not look down on niggers kikes wops or greesers

                1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

                  One of the reasons I love almost politically correct redneck.

                  "It's not ok to make fun of people with disabilities you fuckn' retard."

                2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

                  Fair enough.

        3. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          Let’s hope the TRUE Scotsmen have the balls to overthrow their global Marxist leaders.

    2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      feminists vs trannies

      Cripple fight!

    3. Eeyore   1 year ago

      Should denying that the earth is the center of the universe be a hate crime? If I'm an earth centrist and you tell me I'm deluded, can I put you in prison for giving me a big sad?

      Should J.K. Rowling just be forced to drink hemlock?

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    In passing the Scottish Hate Crime Act, Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls...

    Welcome to the patriarchy, lassie.

    1. Anomalous   1 year ago

      If it's not Scottish, it's crap!

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

        Hold my Scotch.

        - James Clerk Maxwell

        1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          Never really been impressed with Scotch, and I'm a whiskey fan.

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

            Fair enough but Maxwell is in the running for the GOAT in physics, so certainly he isn't crap.

      2. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

        I got your Mike Myers SNL skit reference.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      They're giving it all they've got captain.

    3. n00bdragon   1 year ago

      If women can be men, I see no reason actual women can't be part of the patriarchy. :^)

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        The matriarchy has always been in charge. They just call it patriarchy to deflect blame.

    4. Public Entelectual   1 year ago

      Nae true Scotsman would hang that Rowland lass, for nae article of clothing is less concealing of true gender than the kilt.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    So, Mnuchin would have to assemble a team to not only secure funds to buy the app, but also to rebuild its algorithm from scratch.

    Get a load of Musk Jr. over here.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Worked for Mastodon, right ENB? Right?

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        I heard that’s where all the cool kids went.

        1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          Or possibly the people who want to fuck kids………

          Perhaps Pluggo could opine. That’s really his wheelhouse.

    2. Ben of Houston   1 year ago

      Here's the thing. The algorithm can evolve over time. You start with pure random suggestions. You can then make simple adjustments to the randomness based on viewer preferences.

      I could get something functional in a matter of hours. With months or years of data, we could evolve it to take more and more into account.

      Algorithms aren't trivial, but they aren't exactly rocket science. Especially since this doesn't have wrong answers. It's not grammar or AI generation.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The shelters, in total, cost about $260 million annually.

    How much would mental asylums cost.

    1. R Mac   1 year ago

      And deprive everyone of that culture?

  5. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    I kinda love that Donald Trump pretended he was suspending his campaign for April Fools'.

    First time I am sorry I didn't get a campaign's text message.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Humor is racist white patriarchy!

      1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        On my news feed on my phone was a story from Aspen about Colorado passing a law mandating reintroduction of Mammoths. As it was dated yesterday, and parts of the story didn't jibe, I figured it was an April's Fool story, but being Colorado I wasn't sure, so I searched it and couldn't find any other stories on it, so I figure my first instinct was correct but it's getting really hard to tell anymore.

        1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          Boone and Crocket also released a 'how to score Mammoth and criteria for Boone and Crocket' yesterday on Facebook, again I'm guessing an April Fools joke.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    California may be liberalizing its assisted-suicide laws, following the controversial Canadian playbook.

    You know who else took steps to ease perceived burdens on a system by eliminating them?

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Taco Bell, when they installed the ordering kiosks?

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      I know I'm wrecking the joke, but the Nazis really did invoke compassion at the start of their euthanasia program.
      And then they extended that compassion to the mentally ill and retarded, and sick infants, and elderly who weren't terminally ill.
      And then they stopped asking for consent.

      1. American Mongrel   1 year ago

        Wait, wasnt “nazis were progressives” the joke the whole time?

        Their segregate the world plan had good intentions too before it devolved into mass murder. That's kind of the way scientism goes. (to murder the joke even further).

        1. Eeyore   1 year ago

          Not a joke. Nazis were progressives.

          1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

            The only differences between them and neo progressives are a different collection of scapegoats to demonize, and the Nazis had snappier uniforms.

      2. Quo Usque Tandem   1 year ago

        Useless eaters, every one if them!

        If Nietzsche (their posthumous prophet) didn’t approve, off you went.

    3. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Newt Gingrich?

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Margaret Sanger?

    5. Minadin   1 year ago

      Gordon Ramsay?

    6. Uncle Jay   1 year ago

      Johnny Fuckerfaster?

      1. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   1 year ago

        HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA....

        There's a blast from the past...ha ha....

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Big Banks are 'quiet quitting' their climate promises...

    I'm pretty sure quiet quitting is already whatwas.

  8. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    California may be liberalizing its assisted-suicide laws, following the controversial Canadian playbook.

    Weird. This is a state-by-state issue?

    I've been told the US Constitution guarantees the right to "bodily autonomy." Why, then, wasn't assisted suicide established as a Constitutional right decades ago?

    1. Zeb   1 year ago

      I guess people who are about to die don't have that great of a lobby.

      1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

        The "Jane Roe" of the right-to-die movement should not have been someone with terminal cancer. He / she should have been an adult with no physical illness, just decades of severe depression.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Your comment does not include Chicago.

      3. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        Certainly not as good as good a lobby as the medical/ pharmaceutical industry. There's much more money to be made off of desperately keeping people alive just that little bit longer than in letting them off themselves.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          And a fancy Dr. Death suicide machine billed to the patient's insurance generates more profit than a self inflicted bullet to the head.

          1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

            True. As long as someone's making money off of them...

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Why, then, wasn’t assisted suicide established as a Constitutional right decades ago?

      It is a natural right.

      I have the list but I'm not sharing it.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        You have a right to kill yourself. You don't have the right to convince others to murder you.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          “You have a right to kill yourself.”

          Turd should be reminded of this everyday.

          1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

            I don’t think anyone here has made a greater effort to counsel Pluggo towards suicide than I have. Alas, to no avail.

            1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

              Doing the Lord's work, Fudd. Thank you for your service.

              1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

                If successful, the result is it’s own reward.

        2. Uilleam   1 year ago

          Or compel others to pay for it with tax dollars.

        3. Square = Circle   1 year ago

          You don’t have the right to convince others to murder you.

          Why not? You can't force anyone, obviously, but why should you not have the right to even ask?

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            Because generally speaking, except psychopaths, killing people carries an emotional toll. I've personally shut off life giving machines at families request, when there was no chance of recovery (and the person was basically a vegetable) and even that act of mercy, consistent with do no harm, carried a level of guilt. Asking someone else to off you because you don't have the balls to do it yourself, is placing a burden on them which no person should be asked to do. When medically necessary, helping to ease the end is compassion. When medically unnecessary asking someone else to kill you is selfish and unnecessarily inflicts harm (no matter how small) on anyone with empathy.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Well said.

      3. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

        A right I emphatically encourage you to exercise.

    3. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

      Why, then, wasn’t assisted suicide established as a Constitutional right

      I believe the "assisted" part complicates things. I can kill myself, but if I kill you, even with your consent, we hit a gray area at best.

      As for suicide, that's one right that even totalitarians have trouble denying.

      1. DesigNate   1 year ago

        I think Sandra was drawing a parallel to abortion, seeing as how that requires assistance as well. Unless the fetus goes all Butterfly Effect and wraps the umbilical cord around its own neck.

        1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

          Yeah, that makes sense.

    4. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      The Bodily Autonomy doctrine went out the window when the Trump Vaccine became the 100% Safe And Effective Vaccine.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Sad but true.

    5. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   1 year ago

      Hey what’s your name??
      How old are you?
      Where’d you go to school?
      Uh huh…yeah…uh huh…yeah
      Well now that we know each other a little bit better…bring back the parody.

      *allusion to The Doors, not Van Morrison

  9. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Iran vowed revenge on Israel after blaming it for a deadly air strike on its embassy in Syria...

    Iran going at Israel directly? I doubt it.

    1. Anomalous   1 year ago

      The Ayatollah really doesn't want a tritium enema.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        tritium enema

        Nice band name.

    2. n00bdragon   1 year ago

      My bet is on more terrorism justified by the crackdown on terrorism.

      1. DesigNate   1 year ago

        It’s almost like they’re just using that as an excuse. The nerve!

    3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      I almost wish Iran fucked around because pretty sure Israel will help them find out. In fact, I'm betting Israel almost hopes they fuck around, so they can find out, and I'm betting the Saudi's and Kuwaiti also secretly hope so.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    San Francisco assemblyman tries to make after-hours work emails illegal...

    Assemblyman's staff sighs relief until they learn he's exempt.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      It will still take 90-120 days for them to repond constituents.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Making people believe there isn't enough space for trans women in sports is white supremacist patriarchy at work.

    OMG They captured NOW!

    ...back in the 90's.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Pretty sure that letting biological males dominate women's sports is the patriarchy at work.

      1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

        I can confirm, it was at the last meeting. Low-key encouraging trannies in sports until women's events are 2 teams of men playing each other, while the actual men laugh hysterically.

      2. Ron   1 year ago

        lets double down on the naming, men in women's sports is Misogynistic Patriarchy.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      I just don't understand how people blindly support and push the narrative that these groups are well intentioned and useful.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Just look at all organized religions through all human history.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          The entire protestant movement was about criticizing the practices of the catholic church.

          1. DesigNate   1 year ago

            And the Catholic Church spent a fair amount of time criticizing the practices of pagan Romans.

          2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            And each other. Lutheranism vs Calvinism, episcopal vs presbyterianism.

    3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      I can almost, if I squint hard enough, see the patriarchy argument but the white supremacy thing is pure off the deep end.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    For 40 years, the Los Angeles mandated that every new high-rise install a helicopter pad on the roof on the basis of fire safety.

    That's what they say, but in fact they got duped just like everyone else into believing we'd have flying cars by now.

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      I mean we do have flying cars. They're called helicopters.

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        Yeah, the problem is making flying in general not hugely noisy and expensive.

    2. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      What makes LESS sense than landing on a burning building?

      (other than voting democrat)

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        Taking an elevator to the top floor to get to the helicopter?

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Landing a burning building on a helicopter?

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Flying a burning helicopter into a building?

          1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

            Setting yourself on fire outside of a building and demanding a ceasefire?

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              Stop right there. We all agreed this makes total sense and should be encouraged.

              1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                I'll provide the lighter fluid.

                1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                  Or to make sure it's effective, I'm thinking gasoline mixed with diesel mixed with an emulsifying and gelling compound.

                  1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                    I hear this really helped IJ soldiers who chose death over surrender to achieve their desired goals.

      3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        Continuing to invest in tilt wing technology, especially the V-22?

    3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      I guess they don’t know that fire and smoke go up.

    4. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      It was killed by Big Auto and Gas along with the water powered car. I saw the prototype in action, well a friend did...more of a friend of friend if I'm honest.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        I actually subscribed to that guy's newsletter.

        1. Pear Satirical   1 year ago

          That was my father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            What does that make us?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Absolutely nothing! Which is what you are about to become. Prepare to die. You have the ring. And I see your Schwartz is as big as mine. Now, let's see how well you handle it.

      2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        Was your friend Keanu Reeves?

    5. Chinny Chin Chin   1 year ago

      The helo pads are a lovely example of how government's dispersed cost can yeild great concentrated benefits.

      Imagine if you - on Jan. 29, 2020 - were one of the 15 people trapped in an apartment fire in West LA, and were roof-top rescued by a LAFD helicopter. I bet you - and many voters - might think the program's cost was worth it. That potential victims' right to life trumped everyone's property rights.

      Should property rights prevail in situations where lives can be saved?

      1. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

        Why stop there? Why not require everyone to walk around with a fire extinguisher? After this law passes, and you just happen to be near a fire, you'll thank Chinny for getting this law passed. But maybe the peril you're facing isn't a fire. You could fall and hit your head. So maybe everyone should be mandated to walk around wearing a helmet. Think about how thankful you'll be when you or someone you love falls but is wearing a helmet so there's no brain damage.

        Then again, if you decide to go sky-diving, your parachute could malfunction. Everyone should have to drive to work wearing a spare parachute. You aren't planning on going up in a plane, but you might forget the parachute in the event you do, so everyone, everywhere, should have to live life with a parachute strapped to his or her back. If it saves just one life, it's worth it, right?

  13. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

    Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work.

    NOW is gaslighting actual women in favor of dudes.

    How in the fuck did we get here?

    Lemme guess: NOW is ran by purple haired liberal women and a few dudes in skirts.

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      Depends if you count kilts as skirts.

    2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      Also, why are we stopping at only a mere 2 boogeymen in white supremacy and patriarchy?

      Cant it be white supremacy, colonialism, patriarchy, climate change, systemic racism, inequality, and homo/transphobia? Why not just include the entire globohomo gobbledygook agenda, its all just braindead extrapolation from marxist academics anyways. Throw them all in the clown car before that thing drives off the cliff!

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Where's Lying Jeffy this morning to tell us which insane concepts and buzzwords are applicable here?

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Licking fed boot?

        2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          Elbows deep in his next 55 gallon drum of Ben & Jerry’s?

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The false belief that being a savior actor is righteous.

    4. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      How to make people hate trannies in two easy steps.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        ^This^

        All this bullshit and attempted gaslighting probably is provoking a lot of backlash. Put another way: most people probably never gave trannies a second thought until they started demanding access to women's restrooms, locker rooms, and started demanding to be allowed to compete against physically dominate and humiliate actual women at women's sports.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          But don't call it a sexual fetish.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          Mentally ill people don’t always act rationally?

          1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

            Let me mull that over. Hmm. I find your radical theory entirely plausible.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Let me help. NOW is run by ugly women who hate their uppity sisters who appeal to men, aka UNFAIR ADVANTAGES!

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Soon to be run by ugly men in drag.

        1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          How long until the next president of NOW is a tranny? Over and under?

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            Well if the Michelle Obama rumors are true.......

          2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            When "Woman of the Year" is just a dude in a dress and make-up, all bets are off.

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              Yeah you're right, silly to bet on a guarantee.

            2. Pear Satirical   1 year ago

              Didn't that happen years ago with Caitlyn Jenner.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                Um, yes.

  14. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    "National Organization for Women seems to be pretty anti-woman"

    Yiiiiiiiikes! Someone needs to be reeducated by Reason.com's 2SLGBTQIA+ authority Scott Shackford! 🙁

    He'll mansplain that women with testicles are, in fact, just as female as those without. And they deserve full inclusion in women-only spaces including, but not limited to, sports, bathrooms, locker rooms, the lesbian dating scene, and prisons.

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      I know compromise is the worst form of problem solving (nobody gets what they want), but I've always though of bathrooms and locker rooms in two different categories. If the tranny wants to take a shit in a woman's stall then whatever, I don't care, but little Sally does not need to see your floppy dick in the locker room.

      1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

        but little Sally does not need to see your floppy dick in the locker room.

        This is my beef with the current crop of fathers. If my little Sally were to be exposed to some dude's dick (venue is NOT relevant) one of us is going to the ER of the morgue.

        I am completely lost why fear of fathers does not curb the dudes in women/girls' spaces.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Because Dad isn't in the locker room and women are slaves to social fashion.

        2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

          Ive thought this same thing in the context of the Riley Gaines stuff.

          I can only guess there was too much on the line, and the fathers were being asked by the daughters not to step in to fuck up their scholarship / team position.

          But these lesser incidents? With lower stakes, and dudes flopping their junk around in girls locker rooms, I am honestly amazed there have been no beat downs. Probably because the dads know there would be a media firestorm, their jobs lost, and the POTUS calling for them to be in jail

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            Riley Gaines has a story about her own father who wanted to go in there and throw Thomas out. But she asked him no to, because she didn't want to see her father in jail.

          2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            Have you seen modern day dads nowadays? This isn’t That 70’s Show.

            1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

              I learned my parenting skills from Al Bundy.

            2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              My wife maintains they based Red Foreman on my father.

              1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

                I loved Red. Decent, hardworking, patriotic, tough, and always willing to call out dumbassery when he encountered it.

          3. DesigNate   1 year ago

            Thank god I haven’t had to deal with this yet. I imagine a lot of the reason you’re not seeing it is your last sentence coupled with there being enough dads who agree with the bullshit that they would prevent it or otherwise make your life a living hell.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        If the tranny wants to take a shit in a woman’s stall then whatever

        I don't really think they care about where they take a shit.

        There are only two reasons for them to want to use the ladies.

        1. Male transgenderism is usually either autogynephilic or fetishistic transvestism. By forcing you to let them use the ladies you're feeding their sexual fantasy of being a desirable woman.

        2. When it isn't then they're whacking off in there to the sounds of women urinating.

        1. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   1 year ago

          I hope #2 is true

      3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Under, e.g., Obama's Title IX "guidance" (go read it) "that a man who (with no physician's diagnosis or any physical operation) identifies as a woman is entitled to the same rights under Title IX." This is the position of the NCAA, too, apparently.

        So it's worse than that. A man doesn't have to actually identify as a woman. He can merely claim that he does, cannot be questioned on his claim, and can change his mind at any time. Because, "gender fluid". A truck-sized loophole for pedophiles and miscellaneous perverts. Get arrested for setting up shop in the ladies room? Just claim "I identify as a woman."

        Apart from real criminals, this is a fiasco waiting to happen when hormone-plagued adolescent boys, being adolescent boys with raging hormones, realize--and sooner rather than later they will realize--that they can pop into the girls locker room at will. Just lie and use the "I'm gender fluid and feel like a girl right now." excuse.

        The 0.3% of people who are actually transgendered are not the real target of biological sex laws. If someone has had hormone therapy and surgery to change their outer sex appearance, they will not even be noticed.

        The smaller fraction of transgender men who want to use a men's bathroom are also not really the issue, even if they have not completely transitioned. Women in a men's room pose no significant threat to the men there regarding sexual assault. There are not a lot of "upskirt" photos taken in men's rooms.

        The smaller fraction of earnest transgender women but who have not completely transitioned who want to use a women's bathroom are certainly being--unfairly, to be sure--told by this law to go along with society and use the men's room instead, in an effort to deny a safe haven loophole to would-be rapists and other deviants.

        If the bathrooms and locker rooms are such a problem for transgendered folks, maybe the solution is to have all bathrooms and locker rooms be unisex from kindergarden on up and in all public places. REAL nondiscrimination in the bathroom.

        Just let the football team and cheerleaders use the same locker room. Nothing bad could possibly happen there right?

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          Transgender people were never a problem until the "transgender movement" of the last handful of years. I had a friend forty years ago who decided he was trapped in the wrong body. He wore women's clothes and acted like a (stereotypical) woman. No body cared where he/she pissed. These people have always been around and mostly tolerated (see the Lou Reed song referenced above). What's changed is the codification of the "right" to be whatever gender you "identify" as on any occasion. And lets be clear here. When it comes to bathrooms and locker rooms and prisons we're talking about biological men. The trench coat exhibitionists have always been around but most people don't think their daughters should have to put up with that shit. Now the progressives demand that they have a legal right to join the YMCA, walk into the women's locker room and wave their junk around in front of your six year old daughter. Part of being an adolescent male is learning to keep your rocket in your pocket. That bad boy is liable wake up at any time. Most of us learn to control that thing until the circumstances are appropriate. Now one only need to declare oneself a woman when convenient and no one is allowed to complain.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            Dave Smith brings up a pretty compelling theory on this. Around 2010, you had the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street. A right wing and a left wing movement that although very different in some ways, were both against the elites and what they were doing to enrich themselves.

            All of the sudden the corporate press started shoving racism and lgbtqfhdj shit down everyone’s throat so that people would be fighting over issues that don’t threaten their power. It’s backed up with data about how often certain terms were used in the media.

            1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

              Well problems that weren't actually problems now drive narratives on all sides. The theory makes sense. There always seems to be a shiny new object.

            2. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   1 year ago

              All of "the" sudden?
              What "the" fuck?

          2. Zeb   1 year ago

            It's a damn shame we've gotten to the point where laws are even needed to manage this shit. I've always said people can just use whatever bathroom they can get away with with least disruption. If you can pass as the other sex, then no one will care. But now the point doesn't seem to be to pass, but rather to rub it in everyone's face.

        2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          “Just let the football team and cheerleaders use the same locker room. Nothing bad could possibly happen there right?”

          I’ve seen movies online where that happens. They usually end well.

      4. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=purk9KRXYzQ

      5. n00bdragon   1 year ago

        I've always found this requirement peculiar. No one checks ID at the entrance to bathrooms or locker rooms. If you pass for a woman well enough that no one questions your presence in these places, then there's no need to explicitly allow you. You just go in, do your thing undetected, and leave undetected. If you don't pass, then obviously something is so out of place that you don't need to be there.

        Use the facility that will cause the least amount of distress and incident to everyone around you.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          And lose the opportunity to draw attention to yourself?

  15. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

    "it seems remarkable that those who think it is did not consider women a category worth including within its remit."

    Biden admin, adding men pretending to be women to Title IX, on line 2

  16. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

    ""Big Banks are 'quiet quitting' their climate promises," from Bloomberg. Not only is "quite quitting" a dumb turn of phrase that won't stand the test of time, but also, the big banks were always trying to placate and never going to actually follow through on climate-related demands."

    This, the DEI stuff as well. Its corpos latching onto current-thing to satisfy the neoliberals who currently rule the roost, as they know the neocons were never going to put up any fight and have their back anyways.

    A good example being blackrock mysteriously figuring out "actually, BTC isnt too bad for the environment" suspiciously around the time of pushing the SEC for a BTC ETF

  17. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    6 Myths About Globalization, Trade, Jobs, and "Buy American"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JkPEk8mg_s

    Stossel once again shows his TDS by criticizing Trump's trade policies.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Any nibbles?

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Third article in a row he tries to isolate trump as being the uniquely bad trade candidate. Ignorant to the entire history of trade. But i allows him to ignore every other economic argument while avoiding criticizing democrats.

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Stossel must be one of those NWO globalist commies that MAGA tells us about.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Just don't call shrike jeff and sarc a team. Completely independent thinkers who have all come to an intelligent decision that democrats are awesome through intensive research.

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

          When you Trump-tards put Stossel and me in the Gulag for "dissidence" we will form a resistance.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Like ayn rand, you only invoke parts of stossels arguments you can co opt to trick idiots like sarc.

          2. Sevo   1 year ago

            turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
            turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

          3. jimc5499   1 year ago

            You don't put Useful Idiots in the Gulag. You line them up against the wall and shoot them. Been the same through out History.

          4. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            "When you Trump-tards put Stossel and me in the Gulag"

            Imagine a goosestepping fascist like you thinking you can coopt Stossel.

            Anyway, you will indeed be in the gulag but it will be your own side that puts you there. The Soviet camps were full of old apparatchiks wailing "If only Stalin knew!!"

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              How many party faithful did Mao condemn in his Cultural Revolution?

              1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                That's the one thing that consoles me about the impending authoritarian superstate, is knowing that useful tools like Jeff and Shrike have historically ended up in the gulags and konzentrationslagers like everyone else.

          5. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

            Stop talking about yourself in the same breath as Stossel. Stossel isn’t a Soros worshipping pedophile scumbag.

        2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          Imagine if the three of them starred in modern a real life version of ‘Three Men and a Baby’.

      2. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Ideas!

    4. R Mac   1 year ago

      Poor sarc.

      1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

        Pour pour Sarc.

    5. DesigNate   1 year ago

      Stossel doesn’t have TDS because he doesn’t make everything about Trump, even when it’s obviously not about him, and didn’t seem very swayed by the idea that his style should overshadow his substance.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Sarc’s been told a hundred times that disagreeing with Trump for legitimate reasons doesn’t mean you have TDS. Unfortunately for him he’s a retarded drunk that can only think of a few narratives to push, so he persists.

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        I do remember a few of his videos, don't remember which ones specifically, getting a lot of hate in the comments due to his support for free trade and immigration. The usual suspects said he was a leftist and such being that that's the only possible reason they can conceive for someone criticizing Trump's policies.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          “I don’t remember “

          I bet.

        2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          "The usual suspects"

          Sarc must have watched a new movie. How did it compare to mean girls?

        3. Minadin   1 year ago

          I recall people complaining about his nascent beard when he was first starting to grow it. Not typically regarding his policy takes in general.

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

            Yeah. Stossel's policy positions are mostly good. As far as trump, he has said both positive and negative things about him. Similar to many commenters here.

            But according to dipshit, I mean according to sarcasmic, everyone here must hate stossel, because trump.

          2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            Guilty as charged 😉

        4. JesseAz   1 year ago

          100% lie to justify his own bad behaviors.

        5. DesigNate   1 year ago

          I don’t comment on every article, so I’m sure they mocked and derided his opinion, but I doubt anyone called Stossel a leftist.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            Of course they did. "Leftist" is just another smear against people that the right-wingers don't like. It doesn't have any meaning besides "doody-head".

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Right.

              1. Produce a link where someone in the commentariat called Stossel a "leftist".

              2. Have you looked in a mirror recently?

            2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

              Stossel isn’t a leftist. I’ve never seen any of the regulars call him one. So cut the bullshit Pedo Jeffy.

        6. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          It wasn’t a memory. It was a hallucination you experienced during a blackout drinking episode.

      3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        Does that mean those who make everything about J6 suffer from JDS?

        They know who they are.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Poor sarc.

        2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          Who are these people?

        3. DesigNate   1 year ago

          I mean, there’s a qualitative difference between the shit the government has done to the J6 protesters and the abject hatred so many people have exhibited over one man, no matter what he does (and make no mistake, it started well before he was sworn in to office).

          But hey, if it floats your boat, then knock yourself out.

  18. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    So has anyone watched 3 Body Problem on Netflix?

    I'm almost done with the book and plan to start the show this week. Apparently the adaptation is from the guys who did that HBO series everyone loved 10 years ago then hated 5 years ago.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      If you enjoy the book, the series will annoy you.

      They changed a lot. Kept some major themes. But switched genders and races, added characters, new scenes, etc.

      1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

        In fairness the book takes about 300 pages until a character with a name like "Mike Evans" shows up. I guess when they Americanized this thing they figured viewers couldn't keep track of too many Chinese names.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Yeah. The fact there are dozens of footnotes was much appreciated. But they are already setting up for The Dark Forrest book by bringing in certain characters into the series. They also split single characters from the book into multiple characters in the show. It is a bit of a mess.

          For example one of my favorite things in the book is how they can simplify some abstract physical concepts. Like the scene with the pool table. Would have been so easy to have the scene in the show, but they just cut it out. Then the discovery of the issue with the 3 body problem in the book using multiple time periods becomes 2 scenes for the most part. Cutting out a lot of the books commentary on the development of science.

        2. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   1 year ago

          Try War And Peace and all the Russian names that are close, but not the same as 10 other names in the story

      2. Minadin   1 year ago

        Are we talking like 'Hobbit' level changes & additions or more like 'Rings of Power' level BS?

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Imagine turning Frodo into 2 characters type of changes. One female, one druggie. Although after episode 5 it seems like one of the splits is setting up to be the main character in the 2nd book who wasn’t in the 1st book.

          The entire Oxford 5 is an amalgamation of other characters from the book.

        2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          More like Disney's Three Musketeers from what it sounds like. The only thing the same as the books are the names of the characters.

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            For example, Athos never forgave Milady and his story arc was always about thwarting her and getting his revenge on her.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Haven't read the book, watched the show. Lot's of tedious character development, some splashy special effects and the ending resolves nothing. The whole thing is just a set up for season 2 which may or may not happen. Celebrated here for it's portrayal of Mao's cultural revolution which apparently has been memory holed. My 34 year old son had no idea what that scene was about. So much for 12 years of public school and 5 years of college.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        The ending just preludes the 2nd seasom/book of the Dark Forest.

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        "Mao’s cultural revolution which apparently has been memory holed."

        This has been true for a LONG time. I certainly didn't learn about it in high school, circa 1990's.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Graduated high school in ‘96, and we learned about it, but it definitely wasn’t as much as the Nazis.

    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      I thought it was ok. The science in it was interesting. Did leave a lot of unanswered questions, so I hope there's another season.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Would take you 5 seconds to realize Netflix paid for the rights of all 3 books.

  19. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

    Yesterday, new hate speech laws went into effect in Scotland

    Formerly known as blasphemy laws.

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Same can be said for "climate denier speech".

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        When can we watch some burning at the stake?

        1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

          When they figure out how to claim it is carbon neutral - - - - - -

          1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

            Maybe they can put heretics under really big powerful magnifying glasses.

    2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      The new clergy have taken over, but this time its in the form of a mental illness and death cult.

      The sacraments are:

      Abortion
      Euthenasia
      Cutting off your junk

      With lesser points for signs of devotion like:

      Living in perpetual sadness and guilt with a shitty colored side-shaved haircut
      Obesity

      Blasphemy and heresy are capital offenses

      1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

        Living in perpetual sadness and guilt with a shitty colored side-shaved haircut

        The new monks

  20. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    Well...

    A New York Times investigation of the city's 38 specialized homeless shelters, by the numbers, over a four-year period:

    50 deaths, half from overdoses
    1,400 fights (with half resulting in "serious injury")
    40 fires (half of which were set on purpose)
    Over 40 rapes/attempted rapes/sexual assaults

    At least they're not committing all those crimes out on the street. Oh wait... they're doing that too. Nevermind.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Less death and rape than I expected TBQH.

    2. ducksalad   1 year ago

      Running the numbers and doing some interpretation, the typical shelter has:

      1. One death every three years, likely by overdose.

      2. A fight requiring stitches or a splint every 5 or 6 weeks.

      3. A fire every four years.

      4. A sexual assault every three years.

      Frankly, that’s just not that bad, considering.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        True, and also it's probably a lot easier to get away with violent crimes on the streets than in the shelters, which is why more crime is committed outside of the shelters, hence the sarcastic " Oh wait… they’re doing that too" in my earlier comment.

        Plus, the homeless people who go to the shelters are probably, mostly, the ones who actually do want help and not just miscellaneous mentally ill people, drug abusers, and criminals who just want to fuck shit up and get away with it.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Yeah, the real fuckups are the ones you typically see lounging around outside on the sidewalk or park all day, or lugging around a grocery cart full of crap. Homeless people going to the shelter every night can't afford to be that self-indulgent, and they're often the ones who go to the city day labor sites at 4 am for day-to-day jobs on factory floors, cleaning office buildings, etc.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            Agree with both points, but even then those are surprisingly low numbers.

      2. Ron   1 year ago

        those are low numbers compared to our local small shelter of less than 50 people. the cops are there every day and people die there every year. no fires inside but they have set the outdoors on fire multiple times a years often with lots of damage. Our local woke paper calls them campers

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Yeah, by normal standards and the Reason style guide it sounds like a mostly peaceful collection of homeless shelters.

  21. Yuno Hoo   1 year ago

    the nonsense made of crime data if violent and sexual assaults committed by men are recorded as female crimes

    OTOH, consider the improvement of *employment* data.

  22. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    Hmm...

    California may be liberalizing its assisted-suicide laws, following the controversial Canadian playbook. "Introduced in March by a first-term lawmaker—an attorney with a background in estate planning [emphasis added]—the proposal would enable people without a specific terminal prognosis to request life-ending drugs, a lower threshold than any of the other 10 states that currently allow some form of aid-in-dying," reports Politico.

    No conflict of interest here, I'm sure.

    1. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

      No conflict of interest here, I’m sure.

      No need to chase the ambulance when you can order and schedule it yourself.

  23. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

    Pro pedofile, pro baby killer ENB "commenters telling me to make a sandwhich is super exist, so I will do them"
    Scotland "hold my beer"

  24. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    "Yesterday, new hate speech laws went into effect in Scotland"

    The prophecy of Darby R. Slick:

    'When the truth is found to be lies . . . '

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Grace? Darby? Learn something new every day. Thanks.

  25. MollyGodiva   1 year ago

    I care not at all about how a Scottish law affects a Scottish rich person.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Good, glad to know you agree that it's time to ramp up this political polarization to Israel/Hamas levels.

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Of course you don’t. You live sad life filled with envy of the successful.

    3. Sevo   1 year ago

      Nobody here cares what you think about anything. You are a steaming pile of dishonest lefty shit. Fuck off and die.

    4. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      "Rights and freedom are only for people like me."

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Kill yourself.

    6. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Pretty sure the law allows imprisonment of poor people too. I look forward to your comment when that happens.

    7. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Personally, I hope she abandons her Scottish residency and citizenship and moves to some Carribean tax shelter island. Let Scotland fill the void left by her taxes.

    8. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "how a Scottish law affects a Scottish rich person"

      Because that's all it's about, right shill?

    9. R Mac   1 year ago

      We’re already aware you don’t care about liberty.

    10. Nobartium   1 year ago

      If only liberals like you would extend that courtesy to everyone not living in your jurisdiction.

      Then you'd be infinitely more tolerable.

    11. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      First the came for the rich Scottish person, and I didn't care because I wasn't rich or Scottish. Moron.

  26. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    I already knew this but it's nice to get confirmation that the terms "white supremacist" and "patriarchy" are just buzzwords with no actual meaning.

    National NOW
    @NationalNOW
    Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work. Making people believe there isn't enough space for trans women in sports is white supremacist patriarchy at work.

    Things like this horseshit are just mantras that adherents of the Church of Woke mindlessly repeat without putting any thought whatsoever into what they're actually saying.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      All these buzzphrases are just euphemisms for “bourgeois capitalism.”

      Things like this horseshit are just mantras that adherents of the Church of Woke mindlessly repeat without putting any thought whatsoever into what they’re actually saying.

      Yeah, they’re mantras, but it’s also why the evangelical nature of these people has to be resisted, harrassed, and shut out at all cost.

      “You can’t give shit leftards an inch…if you give them an inch, they’ll use it to destroy you.”–Pope Milei I

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      IDK about ‘no actual meaning’. The needless and earnest inclusion of white supremacy carries a distinct “Poor female athletes are just as bright and just as talented as white female athletes.” connotation.

      Only certain kinds of men would portray themselves as women in order to compete and only certain kinds of women would complain about losing out on opportunities if they did and all those people are white. No black male athletes have transitioned and cheated any black women out of anything and no white male athletes have cheated any black female athletes out of anything… de facto.

    3. HorseConch   1 year ago

      I'm glad to know that women having dicks is only a problem to white supremacist patriarchs. I bet all the other races love dicks on their women.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        I bet all the other races love dicks on their women.

        Thai people don't seem to mind so much...

        *Archer voice* I had something else for this, something about Thai ladyboy hookers..."

      2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        Yeah, ask black males and Hispanics. This is going over like gangbusters among that crowd.

      3. Zeb   1 year ago

        That's so anti-true it's hilarious. Western culture is the one that came up with the whole idea of trans identity, as well as the idea that individuals' choices and preferences should be respected or at least tolerated within reason. And as far as I can tell "white supremacy" (as used by the SJW crowd) just means western culture.

  27. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Unaffordability isn't just for Canadians anymore.

    Study: Americans need a six-figure salary to afford a typical home in nearly half of U.S. states

    “A combination of high mortgage rates, rising home prices and low housing inventory over the last two years is pushing homeownership further out of reach for would-be homeowners, especially first-timers. To afford a median-priced home of $402,343, Americans need an annual income of $110,871, according to a new Bankrate analysis. That’s nearly a 50 percent increase in just the last four years.”

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      "Owning" a house is racist!

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Owning a house is white supremacist patriarchy at work.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Just squat somewhere.

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        Well, anywhere but Florida.

    3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      Didn't you read the reason artical about how owning things is anti libritarian?

    4. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      Owning property and the right to bear arms have, in European and most East Asian cultures, long been considered hallmarks of free people/personal liberty. I wonder what this means for the left who seem hell bent on ending both means? Hmmm.

  28. Sevo   1 year ago

    "... X (formerly Twitter)..."

    STOP! Just STOP!

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Twitter is dead!

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Long live X , (formerly Twitter)!

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          "(formerly Twitter)"

          Wait, what?... really?

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            I'm thinking Musk rebranded it just to troll journalists, so that every time the write they have to do the X (formerly known as Twitter), which of course they really don't have to but social signaling is reflexive for most journalists.

            1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

              He should have rebranded it PublicSquare so the fuckers would understand that he was serious about free speech.

              1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                Probably to on the nose for a good troll. For a really good trolling you need to be subtle in your trolling, pushing right up against the uncanny valley of people's cherished notions.

          2. R Mac   1 year ago

            Lol, yes.

  29. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

    #EdwardTheLongshanksDidNothingWrong

    1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

      "The problem with Scotland ..."

      1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        You can take our lives but you can't take our freedoms*.

        Freedoms may be curtailed if it hurts someone's feelings.

        1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

          I’m not sure why reason’s commenting system keeps eating my reply. Maybe it’s because I was trying to use html tags, so let’s try it without any tags.

          Modern day Scots:

          https://youtu.be/CCwFmkhltXw?t=19

          Edit: now it fucking works.

  30. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    GOP’s Bacon: Biden impeachment probe ‘probably nearing the conclusion’
    .
    Bacon said he spoke with lawyers from the committees spearheading the impeachment inquiry into Biden, who said at this point, there’s “not a specific crime that has been committed.”

    https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4566514-biden-impeachment-probe-probably-nearing-the-conclusion-gops-bacon/

    Dammit! I love a good fake scandal too.

    When is the next one, you Trump-retards?

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Impeachment is a political process, not a criminal one.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      ‘probably nearing the conclusion’

      You're near the finish line, Pluggo.

      “not a specific crime that has been committed.”

      Love the cherry-picked quotes that completely misrepresent his statement.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        "...Love the cherry-picked quotes that completely misrepresent his statement."

        Prettys sure it's been mentioned here that the asshole turd lies. It's what turd does.

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

      You do realize Don Bacon is a never trumper right? Often voting with the dems as part of the uniparty? Lol.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        He doesn’t care. He’s got narratives to shit out.

    5. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

      This is hw we know you are a full on Biden supporter and a liar. This has zero to do with Trump, yet here you are deflecting from Biden and redirecting at Trump supporters. Not to mention you're a pedophile, a racist, and probably the dumbest commenter here.

  31. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Remember when David Koresh set up an autonomous zone? But I suppose this is (D)ifferent.

    An “Autonomous Zone for Palestine” was set up today in Zucotti Park (Manhattan)
    Demands:
    - Liberation of Palestine
    - NYPD funds redistribution to community
    - No cops on MTA
    - Mayor to resign
    -Empty buildings to be used for migrants

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      I should think migrants deserve better than empty buildings.

    2. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

      I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    3. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      How long before they get hungry and declare that they're being deprived of food?

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Hope they get their tampons out in time!

      2. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

        They've got that covered. – NYPD funds redistribution to community

    4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      I remember when they set up the CHOP/Chaz...

      The Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) or Capitol Hill Organized Protest[6][7][8][9] (CHOP),[10][11] originally Free Capitol Hill[12][13] and occasionally the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP),[14] was an unlawful occupation protest and self-declared autonomous zone[1] in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Seattle, Washington. The zone, originally covering two intersections at the corners of Cal Anderson Park and the roads leading up to them,[15] was established on June 8, 2020 by persons protesting the May 2020 killing of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

      Of course, that was (D)ifferent, too.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        The best part of that was when they tossed dirt on some cardboard and tried to grow a garden.

      2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        Or all the social conscious rapes and murders during Occupy Wall Street.

      3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        Of course, that was (D)ifferent, too.

        They managed to murder a black teen at CHOP. Not so different.

  32. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    How anti-vaccine activists and the far right are trying to build a parallel economy
    APRIL 1, 20245:00 AM ET
    A few weeks before the RePlatform conference was scheduled to begin, the event organizers lost access to their money from ticket sales. Their payment processor, Stripe, had frozen their account.
    ......
    "Leave Amazon, leave GoDaddy, leave all these woke corporations behind and start spending money with organizations that have your best interests in mind," said Megan Greene of Patmos, a web-hosting company named after the Greek island that the Christian apostle John is said to have been exiled to.
    .....
    But the entrepreneurs gathered in Vegas represent a broader fusion of communities reacting to years of COVID-19, stolen election narratives and transgender visibility, he said. A shared, embattled subculture.

    https://www.npr.org/2024/04/01/1240778608/anti-vaccine-activists-far-right-freedom-economy-gab-gabpay

    Any of you Peanuts using GabPay?

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Why are you bitter, Sevo?

        Donnie sent you $1400. You should be happy. Did you squander it?

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      "And it's really thanks to the folks on Gab that I became aware of these issues: issues like [the] Jewish Question, issues like Zionist power and Zionist Occupied Government," Torba said on an episode of his podcast in November 2023.
      ...

      Same link.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
        turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "issues like [the] Jewish Question, issues like Zionist power and Zionist Occupied Government,"

        So they're Democrats? That's the only group I know of aside from the Salafists decrying "Zionist power and Zionist Occupied Government".

        Hell, you guys just set up an autonomous zone in Zucotti Park just for that.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The hicklib pederast hates it when his lefty allies are resisted.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        I'm fascinated by this alternate wingnut universe. For real. Like you have your own colleges - Hillsdale College and Bob Jones University.

        I just found out yesterday that you have your own Netflix.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          LOL, figures you’d end up parroting your fellow hicklib Rev. Arthur there.

          Anyway, nothing wrong with your side that the Full Rosenbaum won't solve.

        2. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
          But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

        3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          Should we talk about Bravo, Logo, BET, Cleo TV, TheGRIO TV? Not sure what's wrong with focused media.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            That's (D)ifferent.

        4. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          "alternate wingnut universe."

          Remember when you stated unironically that obama ended combat in Iraq in 2011?

    4. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "A few weeks before the RePlatform conference was scheduled to begin, the event organizers lost access to their money from ticket sales. Their payment processor, Stripe, had frozen their account."

      Notice how Buttplug revels in the fact that a major payment processor has frozen the account of Democratic Party opponents who were doing nothing illegal and didn't actually violate ToS.

      When I call him a fascist I'm not resorting to hyperbole. He really is one.

      1. DesigNate   1 year ago

        You know if it was going the other way, all the usual suspects would be decrying it and saying that these companies were actively colluding to get Literal Hitler reelected.

    5. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      How anti-vaccine activists and the far right are trying to build a parallel economy

      Sign me up

  33. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Look, we have passed the time when free people can live with progressive totalitarians. We need to claim some bit of geography and declare it open to anyone who supports freedom for all. And--though this seems contradictory--expel anyone who acts to reduce freedom.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      That is so 1776.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      So you're an insurrectionist?

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

        We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

        Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

        But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          I actually never get tired of reading that. Thanks.

        2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

          Here are the top ten grievances in the DoI of which the current administration is just as guilty...

          He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public Good.

          He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

          He has endeavoured to prevent the Population of these States; for that Purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their Migrations hither, and raising the Conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

          He has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their Substance.

          He has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the consent of our Legislatures.

          He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

          He has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

          For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

          For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
          For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with Power to legislate for us in all Cases whatsoever.

          He has excited domestic Insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the Inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes and Conditions.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            If you’re on X Josie The Red Headed Libertarian is a great follow (for multiple reasons):

            “Do you know what the 27 grievances of The Declaration of Independence are and how many we living through right now? Well now you will in under 5 minutes. Happy Easter. Let’s go.”

            https://twitter.com/TRHLofficial/status/1774544219555705124

            FYI, I haven’t listened to this yet, but she’s posted on the topic accurately before.

          2. Jerry B.   1 year ago

            “ and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their Substance”

            We called it eating out something else in the locker room.

        3. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

          Wow, what a bunch of hate speech. /sarc

    3. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Welcome to Florida.
      (we only let Miami and Orlando pretend to be democrats so we can laugh at them)

    4. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      we already did that . it was called america

    5. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      1789 called and wants their talking points back.

    6. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      Personal liberty is settler-colonist, white supremacist patriarchy.

      1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        I mean Patrick Henry said 'Give me Liberty or give me death' and he was a rich white guy who owned slaves, so ergo anything he supports must be opposed.

  34. American Mongrel   1 year ago

    "Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work."

    National Organization for Women said as they attacked a woman....

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      It's just the same old cultural marxist nonsense that hasn't changed since the end of World War II. It's also why nothing these people say should ever be taken at face value.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      That's (D)ifferent.

  35. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'National Organization for Women seems to be pretty anti-woman'

    Look, "feminists" have always been motivated by envy--of other women. By nature, they are Marxists who detest inequality, especially when some women get more than others, either by effort and ability, or by looks and sex appeal. Of course they favor trannies, who are also lacking the same traits that the jealous feminists hate.

  36. MatthewSlyfield   1 year ago

    "San Francisco assemblyman tries to make after-hours work emails illegal, as if that's any of his business whatsoever."

    Note: this would already be illegal for hourly employees under federal law. Hourly employees can not legally work off the clock. Sending or reading work emails would be work.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      So if my employee sends me an email after hours to tell me that they are sick and will miss their next shift, and I respond to that email with an email of my own saying "Thanks for the heads up, get better soon." them sending and reading the emails is WORK?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Technically, yeah, if they are using work email systems to notify you, because you're using company resources for communication. If they're just sending it to you via personal email or text then it's not.

        Note that this wasn't even an issue before email became common. You'd call in to the office sick, report the sick time on your time card, and get a doctor's note if you had to be out for more than a couple of days.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Making a phone call with a dial up phone seems like more work than reading an email.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          So it would seem to me then that the employee using the corporate email outside his work hours and presumably accruing worked time in the process was not authorized to work outside those hours. That might be a fireable offense.

        3. mad.casual   1 year ago

          What if it's a call about my husband and I's surrogate delivering and that we're going to be on paternity leave together? Does that make this quibble seem any less retarded?

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            Did you wait the whole nine months to tell your boss that you were having a kid through a surrogate, as opposed to making arrangements in the weeks prior to the birth?

        4. Eeyore   1 year ago

          Plenty of employers don't even have a phone.

        5. Ben of Houston   1 year ago

          Okay. Here's a question. I've never been in an hourly position where work calls or emails are expected. Every time, that comes with a salaried post.

          Now, if you are hourly and they expect you to read and respond to e-mails off the clock, that is actually already illegal. However, if you are salaried, that's the name of the game.

  37. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

    No widespread fraud.
    https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1774966369433583904
    NEW: Mark Wingate, a Fulton County Elections Board member, testifies that he voted against certifying the 2020 election because the county did not verify the signatures on 147,000 mail-in ballots.
    "I asked what did we do for signature verification? And the comment I got back frankly floored me, 'We didn't do any.'"
    Additionally, the county could not provide any chain of custody documentation or surveillance footage for mail-in ballots or ballot drop boxes.
    "I and other board members had requested that we obtain the chain of custody documentation from the department and none of that was ever delivered."
    "There was never any surveillance tape, an inch of footage delivered to the board."

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Leftists monitor for voter fraud the same way they report criminal activity--if they don't document the activities, then it never happened.

      Shit like this is a big reason they claim that voter ID is racist and oppressive, even after Real ID put in a federal identification database.

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Well there goes Jeff and Buttplug's narrative from yesterday.

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      This has been known since 2020. The cleanest election ever narrative is one of denial. See how they keep changing the requirements of evidence. All while claiming there is no evidence.

  38. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    Scenes from New York: A New York Times investigation of the city's 38 specialized homeless shelters, by the numbers, over a four-year period:

    50 deaths, half from overdoses
    1,400 fights (with half resulting in "serious injury")
    40 fires (half of which were set on purpose)
    Over 40 rapes/attempted rapes/sexual assaults

    The shelters, in total, cost about $260 million annually.

    In bolshevism, you pay for your own destruction. It's a neat system.

    1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

      The shelters, in total, cost about $260 million annually.

      I wonder how that compares to re-opening the asylums? Since a lot of homeless people are mentally ill, maybe putting those ones somewhere they can get actual treatment would be a better option than shelters by night and wandering the streets by day?

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        I wonder how that compares to re-opening the asylums?

        Remember how Trump’s no-good, awful, completely terrible, and unimaginably bad, across-the-board 10% tariff on all Chinese goods would cost American *families* $1500 per year?

        These deaths, fights, fires, and rapes are costing New Yorkers $28,000 per *person* per year. Filter that through SALT deductions to your own pocket as you see fit. We can’t stop buying cheap Chinese goods because we have to continue to pay hobos to OD, rape, and set each other on fire. Nothing left to cut.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Tariffs aren’t offset by food trucks bigot.

        2. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

          We can’t stop buying cheap Chinese goods because we have to continue to pay hobos to OD, rape, and set each other on fire.

          Maybe we should start charging admission instead of using forcibly extracted taxpayer dollars to pay for that shit?

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            I'm a pretty cold, libertarian sonofabitch and even *I* have to tap out at the idea of paying or allowing people to watch homeless people rape other weaker homeless people for entertainment.

            It does, however, sound exactly like the sort of abjectly morally repugnant act coated in virtuous buzzwords that you could sell to ENB. "We aren't paying for the raping homeless women for entertainment. We're supporting gig sex workers in their opposition to prohibition and conventional, white, Christian, male, able-ist notions of consent! Just another transaction, like when you pay for your Netflix or Hulu streaming subscription."

    2. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      How many of those fights resulted in people ending up in jail?

  39. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

    The fact that we are even seriously contemplating that someone like Rowling could be jailed for saying something that Progressives deem as hateful is an appalling indicator of how we are nonchalantly drifting into a totalitarian dystopia. This law passed by the Scottish legislature is appalling and hardly unusual in the Western world.

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      Scotland clearly is making its own version of Sharia law; only the favored ideas are different.

      1. Rockstevo   1 year ago

        I was wondering what the hell was going on in Scotland, who is running the government up there then just read an article and found out the 1st minister's name is Humza Yousaf so now it makes sense. They are back dooring in sharia blasphemy laws.

        1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          Governments across the West and in the Anglosphere are proposing such laws. Ireland, the UK as a whole. The US has some greater immunity due to our strong 1st Amendment. Scotland is essentially a one party state whose nationalist party is far Left, and whose current leader is rather racist against Scots.

  40. JeremyR   1 year ago

    I don't mind calling trans women women as a courtesy, but they should not be playing women's sports.

    Like I work with one who used to play football in high school and is 6'1, 260 lbs or so and stronger than me (and I am pretty strong).

    1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      I have a problem as both a biologist and a medical professional playing into other people's mental delusions. Sometimes it's fairly innocuous, such as with dementia patients who think it's 1945 and they're worried about were the baby is. Catering to people with body dis morphia on the other hand is not benign. You don't agree with an anorexic that they're fat.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        Some webzines are not afraid to publish viewpoints that contradict the leftist narrative.

        https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/31/take-it-from-a-transsexual-transwomen-are-not-women/

        If I were going to pay to comment somewhere, it would not be at Reason. Every article on spiked is more libertarian than almost anything here. I haven't seen their comments, but they certainly couldn't do worse than the Reason Gaslight Krew starring chemjeff radical pederast and his shitposting pal SQRSLY.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Yeah, seems like, as a libertarian, I've heard the phrase "I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." somewhere before.

        Almost like it's a fundamental moral violation of oneself to cater (even if only exceedingly generously) to others' delusions and a fundamental moral violation of humanity and rationality at large to expect others to do the same.

      3. Eeyore   1 year ago

        She isn't an anorexic, she is an unweighted person.

        1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          She identifies as fat. As an aside, someone posted on a veterans page I belong to a video of a group for fat queers, where this skinny white guy was trying to convince a bunch of morbidly obese dykes that he belonged their because he identified as a fat queer person. You could see the smoke from the gears in their heads as they tried to wrap their minds around it without admitting self identification doesn't change underlying truths.

          1. Eeyore   1 year ago

            Lol

            For most people forcing down a 20k kcal diet will fix the not being fat problem.

          2. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

            I saw that same video somewhere else. It was fucking hilarious. The best part was how well the kid kept a totally straight face while explaining to the fat dykes that he “identifies as fat.” I would have ruined it and started laughing.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      I don’t mind calling trans women women as a courtesy, but they should not be playing women’s sports.

      90% of the current problem is indulging their mental illness out of a misplaced sense of "politeness."

  41. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

    "Hate crime is an increasingly fluid term with ever increasing sections of society demanding special status for their particular group. The SPF is further concerned that the Bill would move even further from policing of deeds and acts to the potential policing of what people think or feel, as well as the criminalisation of what is said in private."

    Glory be! I never thought I would see the day when police would display more sense than their bosses. It also seems the Scottish police are even less dimwitted than American police. Now if only the SPF had taken the important next step of advising their member to refuse to enforce this bizarre and dangerous new law.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Michigan Wineries Win $50 Million in Fight Against Local Zoning Rules

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 7.26.2025 7:00 AM

How Airline Miles Turned Into a Multibillion Dollar Currency

Gary Leff | From the August/September 2025 issue

If Trump Wants American Businesses To Thrive, He Should Get Rid of Government Subsidies

Tosin Akintola | 7.25.2025 6:15 PM

Trump Seeks Even Higher Tariffs: 'Between 15 Percent and 50 Percent' on Imports From All Countries

Jack Nicastro | 7.25.2025 4:47 PM

The FCC's Paramount/Skydance Decision Aims To Reshape Broadcast Journalism by Bureaucratic Fiat

Jacob Sullum | 7.25.2025 4:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!