Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

State of the Union

Cheering From the Press Box

Also: Oppenheimer and Godzilla win at the Oscars, Virginia state lawmakers nuke plans for taxpayer-funded arena, and more...

Eric Boehm | 3.11.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Godzilla Oscars | PAT BENIC/UPI/Newscom
(PAT BENIC/UPI/Newscom)

There was plenty of cheering in the press box after President Joe Biden's combative State of the Union address. Many pundits rushed to declare that the event had altered the course of Biden's flagging re-election campaign.

"If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign, you're not going to have any more of those weak-kneed pundits suggesting he's not up to running for re-election," wrote Ezra Klein in the Sunday New York Times. Klein is at least engaging in a little self-deprecating wink there: The link in that sentence points readers to his own call, less than a month ago, for Biden to step aside.

Other reactions have been less self-aware. "People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted. "A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?" wondered New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.

Meanwhile, CNN's insta-polling showed that just 65 percent of viewers had a positive view of the speech. Before you object that 65 percent sounds high to you: It's the lowest figure CNN has recorded in the past quarter-century, according to The Washington Post.

"The message now is that the public is wrong and must be ignored, for the sake of democracy," writes Matt Taibbi in Racket News, where he provides a rundown of some of the more "hilariously ostentatious ass-kissing ceremonies" in the wake of Biden's speech, including from MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell ("just astonishing") and Mika Brzezinski ("an incredible moment").

Look, I get it. Biden gave an objectively competent speech and the media love a comeback story. And if you're someone who believes that Biden's historically low approval figures have more to do with the "vibes" than with any tangible policy, maybe it's tempting to go all-in on trying to shift those vibes.

For Times columnist Ross Douthat, the lack of establishment consensus for Biden's polling struggles explains "why, perhaps, there was a rush to declare his State of the Union address a rip-roaring success, as though all Biden needs to do to right things is to talk loudly through more than an hour of prepared remarks."

Is it possible that polls in the coming weeks will show a shift in voters' opinion of Biden's presidency as a result of the State of the Union address? Sure, but I'm going to be skeptical until I see actual evidence that Biden's speech mattered to anyone whose job doesn't require watching it.

Oops! One of the more striking moments during the Republican response to Biden's speech, delivered by Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, was a harrowing story about a woman who'd been kidnapped and repeatedly gang-raped by members of a Mexican drug cartel. Britt's speech attempted to tie the awful incident to the recent chaos along the U.S./Mexico border, but it actually happened nearly 20 years ago—and on the Mexican side of the border.

Confronted with those facts during an appearance on Fox News over the weekend, Britt suggested that the story should be taken seriously, if not literally.

Oscar night. Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer won big Sunday night at the 96th Academy Awards. The biopic about one of the inventors of the atomic bomb claimed seven awards, including best picture, best director, best actor (Cillian Murphy), and best supporting actor (Robert Downey Jr.).

Mstyslav Chernov—the director of 20 Days in Mariupol, which won for best documentary feature—delivered a moving speech in which he said he wished he'd never had a reason to make the film about the Russian military's destruction of a city in eastern Ukraine. Human Rights Watch estimates that more than 10,000 residents of Mariupol died during the first year following Russia's invasion.

"I wish to be able to exchange this to Russia never attacking Ukraine, never occupying our cities," Chernov said. "The people of Mariupol and those who have given their lives will never be forgotten because cinema forms memories and memories form history."

#20DaysinMariupol wins best documentary feature at the 2024 #Oscars pic.twitter.com/9YvoPqWKqR

— The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) March 11, 2024

Other highlights from the big night in Hollywood included another Oscar win for once-homeschooled musical superstar Billie Eilish and her older brother Finneas O'Connell for their song "What Was I Made For," written for the Barbie movie. I'll also applaud Murphy's acceptance speech for noting that the world still lives in Oppenheimer's shadow and dedicating his award "to the peacemakers everywhere," and the filmmakers behind Zone Of Interest for their anti-war statements while accepting the best international film award. And finally, it was a historic night for Godzilla Minus One (a tremendous film with some very libertarian themes), which became the first Godzilla movie to win an Oscar when it claimed the prize for best visual effects.


Scenes from Virginia: I might not have to pay for a stupid new arena! State lawmakers in Richmond appear likely to approve a state budget bill that does not include plans for a proposed $2 billion arena in Alexandria. The structure was supposed to be a new home for the National Basketball Association's Washington Wizards and the National Hockey League's Washington Capitals.

The hero of this story seems to be state Sen. L. Louise Lucas (D–Portsmouth), whom Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin has blamed for single-handedly stopping the arena deal. Lucas, who chairs the powerful Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee, told The Washington Post last week that she does not believe the proposed arena and its $1.5 billion in public debt are a good deal for taxpayers and that the teams' owner, Ted Leonsis, ought to pay for the stadium himself. Amen!

Update from Virginia: Last Monday, in this exact space, I noted that Youngkin had "refused to endorse [former President Donald] Trump (so far)." Two days later, Youngkin bent the knee.


QUICK HITS

  • President Joe Biden will unveil his 2025 budget proposal on Monday. The document will call for higher corporate taxes, but it projects average budget deficits of $1.7 trillion for the next decade even with those higher revenues taken into account, The New York Times reports.
  • Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he has "a big, big problem" with a bill that would legalize marijuana in the state.
  • Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is leading a fight in the Senate to block more than 6,000 earmarks that would cost taxpayers over $12 billion.
  • An obviously doctored photo of Kate Middleton and her three children distributed by the British royal family has stoked more conspiracy theories about the princess' recent absence from public view.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Feds Enforcing Unconstitutional Reporting Law Against Most Businesses

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

State of the UnionJoe BidenElection 2024Media CriticismPoliticsBiden AdministrationAlabamaOscarsMoviesVirginiastadiumsCorporate WelfareReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (260)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    There was plenty of cheering in the press box after President Joe Biden's combative State of the Union address.

    Hip hip hooray for amphetamines.

    1. HorseConch   1 year ago

      That's a pretty methed up thing to say about the leader of the free world.

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        Get off your high horse.

        1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          Horse is a downer, not an upper.

        2. Kungpowderfinger   1 year ago

          Power is a helluva a drug…along with stem cell derived HGH.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      What a drag it is getting old

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Biden's little helper.

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Told you it wasn't Hunters cocaine in the lock box.

    4. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

      You know who else gave combative public speeches?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        William Jennings Bryan?

      2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        William Travis (well, at least one).

      3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        John Paul Jones. Stephen Decatur.

      4. R Mac   1 year ago

        Randy Macho Man Savage?

      5. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

        Patrick Henry?

      6. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Captain Kirk?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          That. Would have. Been a. Rather. Combative. Speech.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign...

    Joe Biden's body double is my president!

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Does Hunter have enough coke and Ritalin to keep him propped up that long?

  3. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    "People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted.

    And he's just getting younger!

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    “A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?”

    I think that might have been an Adderall-induced aneurysm.

  5. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    "People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted.

    Yeah, I was aksing "what kind of drugs did they feed Sleepy Joe tonight?"

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Harris/Newsome 2024 right?

    2. Kungpowderfinger   1 year ago

      Other reactions have been less self-aware. "People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted. "A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?" wondered New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.

      Butt-licking toadies doing their job to help the Democrat incumbent, how shocking.

    3. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Britt's speech attempted to tie the awful incident to the recent chaos along the U.S./Mexico border, but it actually happened nearly 20 years ago—and on the Mexican side of the border.

    They're not sending their best and brightest to DC.

    1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      Using the Marxist's lies against them when you fuck up. How many times have they taken hoaxes and declared that they at least "started a discussion" or that the story wasn't to be taken literally but as an example.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer won big Sunday night at the 96th Academy Awards.

    I considered it a bomb.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Apparently, it went nuclear at the box office.

    2. Anomalous   1 year ago

      Stop acting like a little boy.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Why? Fat man Jeffy does that all the time.

    3. Kungpowderfinger   1 year ago

      While Oppenheimer did win Best Picture, it was a bit of a disappointment Fermi.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Did you have a meltdown?

        1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

          He was radiating anger.

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

            And Geiger was counting.

  8. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Hunting down the heroes of 9/11.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fdny-chief-vows-hunt-down-its-own-employees-who-booed-ag-letitia-james

    A New York Fire Department (FDNY)'s top official has vowed to "hunt down" pro-Trump staffers who were caught on video booing New York Attorney General Letitia James during a Thursday ceremony.

    "BITS is investigating this, so they will figure out who the members are," FDNY Chief of Department John Hodges warned employees via email, referring to the department's Bureau of Investigation.

    "I recommend they come forward. I have been told by the commissioner it will be better for them if they come forward and we don’t have to hunt them down," the email continues, according to the Daily Caller.

    "It was a political stunt for the city to have the AG there. When it backfired, they sent their fascist pit bulls after guys for exercising their First Amendment rights," one unidentified FDNY retiree told the NY Post, adding "Most were off-duty and not in FDNY uniform."

    James was immediately booed on Thursday as she walked the the podium at the Christian Cultural Center’s Brooklyn Campus in Starrett City, on her way past the families of captains, battalion chiefs and civilians up for promotion, as well as the firefighters who work beside them.

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      And what happens when they are "caught"?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Apparently, they're up for "reeducation".

        1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          DEI sessions will continue until morale improves.

          Firefighters “should understand that BITS is gathering video and identifying members that brought discredit … to the department,” the Sunday memo said. “We want the members to come forward. They will come to HQ to be educated [on] why their behavior is unacceptable.”

  9. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Two days later, Youngkin bent the knee.

    They will all pledge for Trump or go the way of Amash or Meijer.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Or Flake or McCain; who needs Arizona anyway - bunch of losers.

      1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

        Better that Arizona have a Lake than another Flake.

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

          That lake needs to be filled first. A flake in the hand is better than two lakes in a bush or something.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...it projects average budget deficits of $1.7 trillion for the next decade even with those higher revenues taken into account...

    I wonder what Biden will have to say for himself in 2034.

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

      OK, made me LOL.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

        Finally.

  11. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    "If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign, you're not going to have any more of those weak-kneed pundits suggesting he's not up to running for re-election," wrote Ezra Klein in the Sunday New York Times.

    Is this the same Ezra Klein who declared Hillary Clinton is an extraordinarily talented politician in June 2016?

    Months later, of course, Clinton would lose the Presidential election. To a hand-picked opponent. With no relevant political or military experience.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      It's weird what happens when you say the quiet part out loud and insult half of the electorate. Especially after a decades-long career of being tone-deaf and unlikeable.

    2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

      I don’t think Joe Biden can survive the steady diet of stimulants required to regularly reproduce the frantic mania he displayed at the SOTU. And it won’t have the intended result during a debate where he will have love pushback on his bullshit claims.

      1. mamabug   1 year ago

        Does anyone seriously think there will even be a Biden-Trump debate? I'm surprised the Biden campaign hasn't already come out and said something along the lines of 'we won't give insurrectionists a platform.'

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          Give it time, he hasn’t “won” the DNC nomination yet.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Generally speaking, what's the point of even having debates anymore? The whole practice has been in decline ever since the Nixon-Kennedy debate showed that style > substance in the age of mass media. A candidate's positions are going to be generally well-known based on party affiliation, and debates are used mostly for snaps instead of actual policy discussion. You can't even get these people to shut their traps for 60 whole seconds so their opponent can lay out their own positions without interruption.

          Put a bullet in the zombie format's head for good and quit wasting everyone's time.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Trump should also avoid debates like the plague.

        His performance in the last set cost him, I think.

        Any number of times when Biden was just about to wander off into dementia-induced ramblings, or was about to say something incredibly stupid, Trump just could NOT STFU for 5 seconds. He could not keep from bloviating at every single instance long enough to let Biden dig his own grave.

        Mean tweets are one thing, but ceaseless harangues during the debates helped certify that Trump is a self-aggrandizing bully.

        This season, Trump could probably do really well by just running ads showing Obama speeches on illegal immigration, Bill Clinton speeches on illegal immigration, Chuck Schumer speeches on illegal immigration from before they all 180'd "I'm Donald Trump, and I endorse this message." and then shut up.

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          That would be a brilliant ad blitz.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      The rookie Trump strategically and tactically outplayed the veteran--her, the master politician and most qualified person to ever run for the office?! ("There has never been any man or woman more qualified for this office than Hillary Clinton," Obama said.)

      And he is perhaps the most vilified person (and not without cause) ever to run for the office and before the election Mr. Obama had campaigned more for Democrat Hillary Clinton than any modern sitting president had for his party’s nominee.

      And she still couldn't muster the win?

  12. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he has "a big, big problem" with a bill that would legalize marijuana in the state.

    A mellow Florida Man is an unamusing Florida Man.

    1. Knutsack   1 year ago

      Like with social media bans, he's probably just waiting for a better bill to come through.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is leading a fight in the Senate to block more than 6,000 earmarks that would cost taxpayers over $12 billion.

    Where did this guy come from.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Oddly, the same state as the Turtle.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Kentucky? Or is the KY a brand endorsement - eg Bob Dole/Viagra?

      "When [Speaker] Johnson is trying to ram down the the latest omnibus bill, I reach for a tube of good old KY."

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Ha

    3. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      Um, let's see - $12 billion divided by $3 trillion is, what - 0.0001% ?

      1. ducksalad   1 year ago

        Well, 0.4%. But what he'll actually succeed in getting cut will likely be closer to your number.

      2. Overt   1 year ago

        It isn't the $12B. It is that the $12B is used as an incentive to pass the other $10 Infinibajillions. As long as Senator Blowhard gets his bridge in New Peterdamn, he signs off on the bill that ramps up the CIA's budget instead of telling them to pound sand.

  14. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    What a shock, Liz Cheney (D-TDS) lied and suppressed evidence during the J6 show trial.

    https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/08/exclusive-liz-cheney-january-6-committee-suppressed-exonerating-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/

    Cheney and her committee falsely claimed they had “no evidence” to support Trump officials’ claims the White House had communicated its desire for 10,000 National Guard troops. In fact, an early transcribed interview conducted by the committee included precisely that evidence from a key source. The interview, which Cheney attended and personally participated in, was suppressed from public release until now.

    Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city.

    He also testified President Trump had suggested 10,000 would be needed to keep the peace at the public rallies and protests scheduled for January 6, 2021. Ornato also described White House frustration with Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller’s slow deployment of assistance on the afternoon of January 6, 2021.

    Meadows “wanted to know if she need any more guardsmen,” Ornato testified. “And I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’ I remember that number. Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time.”

    Ornato was correct. Bowser declined the offer, asking only for a few hundred National Guard and requiring them to serve in a very limited capacity.

    1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      How much else was hidden?
      Will we ever truly know?

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        Doubtful. We still can't access all the Kennedy files from the CIA and that was 60+ years ago.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          In this case the democrats for J6 deleted the data and records they didn't hand pick.

          1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

            Willful destruction of federal records? Thought that was illegal.

            But it is (D)ifferent, I know.

    2. Minadin   1 year ago

      Well, I for one, am shocked - shocked, to discover that Liz Cheney is a mendacious cunt.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        "Your winnings, sir."

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

        Acorn, tree...

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Never go hunting with a Cheney.

    3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Has anything they alleged turned out to be true?

      Sicknick wasn't murdered.
      There were no poop smears.
      The FBI had as many as 200 undercover agents in the crowd. The NSA and DHS confessed to having agents in the crowd.
      The video shows the Hill Police took down barricades, opened the doors and escorted protesters around.
      The video shows both cops who testified under oath of being horribly injured by protesters were walking around fine and healthy hours after.
      Many of the lawmakers who claimed they had to escape weren't present.
      They didn't want to charge the only guy caught on camera calling for insurrection and an attack on the Capitol.
      They haven't charged the guy clearly caught on camera planting pipebombs.
      They haven't charged the two guys caught on camera breaking windows.
      They haven't investigated the guys caught on camera erecting the "gallows for Pence" prop a full day before the protest.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Yeah, but youre a conspiracy theorist - sarc

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I think he may still be sleeping off the quantity of alcohol he imbibed Saturday morning.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Non sequitur!

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Ad hominem!

          2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

            Fingers crossed for liver failure!

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

      She somehow was offended and defending herself over the weekend. She is claiming the report said Trump didn't ORDER troops, which he is not allowed to do, and never made the claim of OFFERED.

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        I wonder what the reaction and spin would have been if he had TRIED to order troops to the capitol.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Authoritarian Hitler if you do, authoritarian Hitler if you dont.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          See the reaction to suggesting in a NYT oped using national guard vs actually using the national guard in the subways. It’s just always (D)ifferent for some reason.

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            Saw that the NG members won't be carrying their rifles (for the most part) to make people feel safer. As one of the comments on the NYP pointed out, the US Army spends far more time training for BRM (basic rifle marksmanship) and thus are far more proficient with their long arms on average, than they do with their sidearms (in ten years, I never once qualified with the old M-9 Beretta, but had to qualify every year with my M-16 and I was in a medical unit, which had a far higher percentage of personal whose primary weapon would have been the M-9).

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              Also, it’s simple physics a 75 gr round, traveling at 2500 FPS out of a 16 or 20 inch rifled barrel is always going to be more accurate than a 140 gr round, traveling at 1250 FPS out of a five inch rifles barrel.

              One of the people interviewed said they were worried someone might take the rifle away from the soldier and use it. First, that would be big mistake, because his buddy is going to double tap you if you tried that. Second, the way most soldiers sling their rifles across their chest these days makes taking the rifle away pretty fucking hard, and while you’re wrestling with the soldier (whose going to be fighting you every inch of the way, because weapon security is drilled into your head hard, ever want to fuck up the operation of a military post for several hours, misplace a weapon, everything basically shuts down until it’s secured) his buddies are going to double tap you.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    An obviously doctored photo of Kate Middleton and her three children distributed by the British royal family has stoked more conspiracy theories about the princess' recent absence from public view.

    The entire royal family is AI now.

  16. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Maybe the Irish do have a backbone after all.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/11/irish-voters-have-delivered-a-stunning-blow-to-the-establishment/

    The Irish people have just delivered a stunning rebuke to the political establishment. In Friday’s dual referendum, voters overwhelmingly rejected the government’s attempts to change the meaning of ‘family’ and the references to women in Ireland’s constitution. Sixty-seven per cent voted ‘No’ in the ‘family’ referendum and 74 per cent voted similarly in the ‘care’ referendum.

    In the family referendum, the government wanted to change the meaning of ‘family’, as defined in the 1937 constitution, so that it extended beyond marriage to include households based on ‘durable relationships’. In the care referendum, it proposed replacing language surrounding a ‘woman’s duties’ in the home with a clause recognising the role of ‘family members’ in the provision of care.

    Irish voters have not simply rejected the Irish government here – they have also rejected the entire political establishment. After all, Varadkar’s proposals were supported by all of Ireland’s major political parties, as well as by most NGOs, academics and cultural elites. The overwhelming defeat of these proposals shows how out of touch the political establishment is. So many politicians, academics and pundits have no real idea how ordinary people feel about family life. Yes, a growing number of children are born out of wedlock in Ireland. But the majority of Irish people still see the institution of marriage as the foundation of society.

    Predictably, Ireland’s political elites are blaming everything other than themselves for this defeat. In particular, they claim that the wording of the constitutional amendments was far too difficult for ordinary people to understand.

    This response is all too familiar. As we saw in 2016, when Brits voted for Brexit and Americans elected Donald Trump to be president, Western elites are all too ready to attack the public and the institution of democracy if it does not deliver the ‘correct’ result.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Well, that's the last time that they'll let the Irish vote on anything again.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        I mean they voted yes on Brexit but Britain still operates at the behest of the EU. They will just ignore it and continue on.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Yes, but still the last time they let them vote on something like that again... and they will never-ever-ever let the Brits vote against the EU again.

        2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

          I’ve said for years that the Brits should overthrow and execute their government.

    2. BYODB   1 year ago

      The amusing part about this is that it's exactly what one gets from a 'democracy' and yet the very people who continually lecture us about democratic values suddenly get enraged when their top-down edicts get rejected by the very people they owe their jobs too.

      Democracy isn't an unmitigated good, but it's hilarious to see people who claim it's the best thing ever get handed their hat by that very process.

      Notably, consider that 65% of people is a moderate majority and 35% of Ireland was told to pound sand. That's...a lot of people in this case. It's the wolves deciding to eat the sheep.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        The real answer has two parts: why are those definitions in a constitution in the first place, and any government which thinks those definitions are any of its business has too much power.

        1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

          It is the Irish way.

        2. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Right now those definitions get used in Irish welfare programs. The hope by the state was to make the definitions meaningless to increase welfare for trans and others. They were pretty open about it.

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            Oh, I know why those definitions are there and why they wanted to change them. But they are hallmarks of statist control freaks.

      2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        Notably, consider that 65% of people is a moderate majority and 35% of Ireland was told to pound sand. That’s…a lot of people in this case. It’s the wolves deciding to eat the sheep.

        Isn't it more like wolves trying to add shepherd's pie to the menu and the sheep who know the ingredients rejecting it?

    3. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      The intellectuals trying to explain why the Irish electorate refuses to go along with their treason against society.

    4. DesigNate   1 year ago

      That’s impossible. As we all know, only populist and right leaning voters can attack democracy when they don’t win at the ballot box.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Vradakar's a typical Euromutt who was taught by western academia to despise white people. Ireland is about 90% white and has a leader who hates their guts.

  17. DaveH   1 year ago

    Thank you Eric for a daily summary that's far better attuned to your target audience (assuming I'm in it) than those from recent authors.

    If it isn't a sentence to hell, consider doing it all the time.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Do you mean that reluctantly, strategically, or both?

    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      The target audience does not include the commentariat. Comments section is an embarrassment to the publication. Maybe they’re hoping that requiring people to pay will weed out the lying cunts. I think it will have the opposite effect. When they stay, nobody in their right mind is going to pay money to deal with their bullshit. I certainly won’t.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        "Comments section is an embarrassment to the publication."

        Does that include your comments?

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Most of my comments are defending myself from said lying cunts. Not doing that anymore. They can pat themselves on each others backs, because I’m not signing up for Reason Plus. No fucking way in hell. Anyone remotely libertarian should do the same, because those ideas and principles are not welcome.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            This is a lie. Youre often first in thread complaing about others and throwing shit against the wall. Such as this morning. Lol.

          2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            "Most of my comments are defending myself from said lying cunts."

            Narrator: "But the real lying cunt was sarcasmic"

            I can't think of a single claim by Jesse that can't be backed with evidence, but I can think of dozens of instances for you, just off the top of my head.

          3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

            Wait….. then why are you still here?

            These people seem to trigger you bigly, but it’s the 25 bucks that will cure you of your addiction to this place?

            Have fun. Get a different hobby.

        2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          It’s not like they need me to argue with me. They can just state what they say I think and argue against it. When I participate all they do is call me a liar, tell me what they say I really think, and continue to rage against it. They can just keep doing that without me.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Man. Our little buddy is depressed we call put his ignorant bald assertions and hypocrisy out.

            Better help . com

            There you go buddy.

          2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

            Will you try moving to glibertarians?

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              They have a flurry of activity in the morning and then mostly nothing. I do go there now and then, but it's not very interesting.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              I remember that. He made big announcements of how he was leaving this place and that the Glibs were the only place for him, and then two weeks later he got punted and came back pretending that nothing had ever happened.

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

                You left out the best part where, before his short-lived migration, he declared that chemjeff and White Mike were "probably the most libertarian" of regular commenters.

                chemjeff, who once argued that refusal to get a COVID vaccine was akin to driving around with a bear in the trunk of your car.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  That will never get old.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Pour sarc. Hopes him, jeff, and Mike are the true libertarians. Doesn't realize he is a useful idiot of the uniparty. Feel sad for him.

      3. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

        Sarc, do you understand that a you are a ‘lying cunt’, and an embarrassment to this or any other publication unfortunate enough to suffer your presence? Or has the alcohol done too much damage for you to understand such basic facts?

  18. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

    Bring back Liz Wolfe. Boehm the Birdbrain just doesn't make the grade, either reluctantly or strategically.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      You don't enjoy commentary on the SOTU, Oscars, and British Royal family?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Only if it's snarky as hell. Apparently Jimmy Kimmel did what comes naturally and made a typcial ass of himself at the Oscars. Personally, I feel no need to watch a self-congratulatory circle jerk of progressives wanking each other off.

        1. Minadin   1 year ago

          I watched exactly as much of the Oscars as I did the SOTU.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            I didn't even know that they had one until just now. There's a lot of crap I watched in the 90's that I couldn't even imagine watching now.

          2. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Watched less because I did watch a few SOTU clips.

          3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            ditto

            1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

              You were probably passed out in your garbage can by the time of the broadcast anyway.

  19. Jerry B.   1 year ago

    “The hero of this story seems to be state Sen. L. Louise Lucas (D–Portsmouth), whom Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin has blamed for single-handedly stopping the arena deal.”

    A Democrat unwilling to spend taxpayer money? I can’t buy that.

    A Democrat who doesn’t want a Republican governor’s plan to go through because he’s a Republican? Gets my vote.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      There is a big state and city fight going on for where the D C. Teams should move to in the area. My guess is he was payed to lose the move to Arlington by other state lobbyists.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        I actually think it's hilarious how every team from Oakland has either left or is getting ready to leave soon.

        No, teams aren't owed taxpayer-provided stadiums, but I don't blame them for leaving to places that will bribe them with such things, either. The main problem is that too much of post-WW2 American identity has been wrapped up on sportsball teams because there isn't anything else tying people together through civic or community relationships. It epitomizes American social atomization.

  20. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Minority Report come to life, eh.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/10/how-canada-became-a-cauldron-of-authoritarianism/

    It seems Justin Trudeau isn’t only a dick – he also gets his ideas from one. Philip K Dick, to be precise. Trudeau’s government has proposed a new law that would give judges the power to put an individual under house arrest if they fear he might commit a hate crime. That’s right – might.

    It is courtesy of Bill C-63 that the pitiable citizens of Canada might soon find themselves languishing in court-ordered confinement despite having committed no crime. The bill is devoted to tackling ‘hate’ on the internet. As is always the case when officialdom puffs itself up and declares war on mean words online, it is riddled with draconianism. For example, the mad law, if passed, would allow people to file complaints (shorter version: snitch) to the Canadian Human Rights Commission if they spot ‘hate speech’ online. Those found guilty of this sin of making a nasty utterance could be ordered to pay victims up to $20,000 in compensation.

    I predict that C-63’s incentivising of snitching will cause an explosion in complaints of ‘misgendering’. Perhaps Canada will become a no-go zone for thoughtcriminals like JK Rowling.

    But it is C-63’s proposal to introduce something like precrime into Canada that has caused most waves. The idea is that individuals who are talking shit online, especially if they’re aiming their invective at minority groups, could be ordered to stay indoors or to wear an electronic tag if a judge fears there could be an ‘escalation’ in their behaviour. Precrime, then. Dick’s idea made flesh.

    Canada’s embrace of precrime is deeply disturbing, but isn’t it also in keeping with the tyrannical drift of our times? We’re all precriminals now. We’re all viewed by the priestly technocrats that rule over us as volatile creatures, a mob-in-waiting, one Daily Mail editorial away from becoming pitchfork-waving lunatics.

    Let’s be clear: the Western elites’ war on ‘hate’ is a war on freedom. From Canada to Ireland to Scotland, and all over Europe, laws are being enacted or proposed that would punish what is fundamentally an emotion, a thought, a feeling: hate. My view is that no emotion or thought or utterance should ever be punished – only action; only actual behaviour that harms person or property. I’m with Émile Zola. ‘Hatred is sacred’, he wrote. ‘It is the indignation of strong and powerful hearts, and the militant scorn of those who are angered by stupidity and mediocrity.’ ‘There is no crime in having one’s own opinion, and the freedom to express it should be absolute’, Zola said. Can someone tweet that at Justin Trudeau? Not a Canadian citizen, ideally – we wouldn’t want you to be arrested.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      A reminder that, like many dictators, Trudeau's party lost the popular vote to the Conservatives in the last two elections. And unlike the US with its electors, Canada is a parliamentary democracy, so that matters.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        What really needs to happen in Canada is the removal of Jagoff Singh. Get rid of Jagoff, and Justin fades away.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      The white zone is for loading and unloading only...

      1. BYODB   1 year ago

        There is no stopping in the red zone.

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

        Enforcing all the laws that haven't been passed yet.

    3. Sevo   1 year ago

      "...Trudeau’s government has proposed a new law that would give judges the power to put an individual under house arrest if they fear he might commit a hate crime. That’s right – might...

      One of our resident lefty shits is happy with murder for same:
      JasonT20
      February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
      “How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”

    4. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

      Canadians should overthrow their government and burn this prick at the stake.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      They're trying to punish "hate" because they know their ideology is deserving of such emotion.

  21. Think It Through   1 year ago

    What is obviously doctored about the Kate Middleton photo? Neither this sentence nor the X link tells me. Nothing jumps out at me, looking at the picture. Maybe her hands are too far from her body? Arms aren't that long? Anyway, maybe you could tell me instead of making me guess.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      Kid's hand is doing some weird shit and the dutchess's legs look like they are from a 10 year old, among other oddities.

      https://twitter.com/chrisshipitv/status/1766944328847364201

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Her legs are fine, the camera flattens the perspective of the legs being extended slightly forward, which makes them look smaller. They also say Charlotte's hand doesn't line up with her sleeve but that appears to be a perspective issue too.

        Not saying that it isn't shopped. Just that I can't see where and two examples given in the comments, aren't.

        1. BYODB   1 year ago

          Couldn't say myself, although Middleton herself says it was doctored and it's implied she did it so...one assumes it had something to do with making her look better than she does since that's what 90% of people try to do with photoshop.

          Not that I believe for a second that a princess is doing her own photoshop work, or that if she did it would be good enough to fool most people.

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

            I couldn't help but think her daughter made an ok sign and that needed to be scrubbed least the SPLC see it.

          2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            I take it back, there is something wonky with Charlotte's sleeve.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              They had to remove Joe sniffing the daughters hair. Give them a break.

    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Mother's Day portrait: From an 'empty space' where Charlotte's sleeve should be, to the Princess of Wales' 'misplaced' zip and the patterns on Louis' jumper

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13182189/Kate-Middleton-Mothers-Day-photo-problems-picture.html

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        I'm not sure about all of those, but the zipper thing was pretty obvious.

    3. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

      I thought about investigating this, but then it occurred to me that I really don’t care in the slightest.

  22. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    America Has Achieved ‘Energy Independence’ For The First Time In 40 Years: JP Morgan

    https://www.theautopian.com/america-has-achieved-energy-independence-for-the-first-time-in-40-years-jp-morgan/

    When will Fatass Donnie stop lying about this?

    He WON'T of course.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      I mean most of that growth is off leases signed by Trump. How many has Joe signed? How many times has he lost in court trying to shut down energy?

      Lol.

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Wasn't energy independence announced under Obama and again in 2021?

    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Looks like the goalposts just got carried off.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Still doesn't understand the term. Rushes to defend shrike pretending this is due to Joe. Can't help defend Joe. Lol.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          And because sarc will deny this.

          Energy leases surged under Trump.

          https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/oil-gas-permits-leases-surged-from-final-obama-year-through-trump-years-63204116

          Leased property takes 4-5 years to produce at level.

          Biden started canceling leases.

          https://apnews.com/article/climate-business-environment-and-nature-91f740cbd9f5f872fcdee911ff5f8026

          As well as pipelines and construction permits on new refineries.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Courts stepped in to block Biden's pauses on leases.

            https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-climate-change-environment-and-nature-business-9751c4909a8b1baba28f3bcff9d5fa6e

            Every step of the way Joe has tried to reduce energy extraction while shrike and sarc pretend he is responsible. The same shit was done under Obama.

            The majority of growth is also on private and state lands where Biden has no say. But the useful idiot want to give undue credit to their hero. Lol.

            1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

              The majority of growth is also on private and state lands where Biden has no say.

              And Fatass Donnie has no say either. The growth is in the Permian and Bakken basins - not in Alaska which is where the politics are confusing you.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Do you know what percentage is on federal lands? That’s the only part the president can influence. I looked it up, and it's 24%. And all the president can do is approve or not approve new leases. So it doesn't look like the president can have a huge effect on total production. Which means Trump this and Biden that is just a red herring.

                1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

                  Which means Trump this and Biden that is just a red herring.

                  Of course it is. And that means Donnie is full of shit.

                  When oil/gas production soared during the Obama years it was due to fracking innovation.

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    On state and private lands, but he took credit.

                    Back when we had a semi honest media they even called him out on it. But you’ve given him credit as well.

                    https://apnews.com/5dfbc1aa17701ae219239caad0bfefb2

                  2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    While it is true that Trump approving leases and Biden not approving leases had an effect, as a percentage of total production it's a mere distraction.

                  3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    It never soared on public lands no matter how you and Sarc try to spin it, and Obama was against fracking if you want to remember.

                    Court strikes down Obama fracking rules for public lands

                    "A federal judge has struck down the Obama administration's rules for hydraulic fracturing on public lands, a victory for oil and gas producers and state regulators who opposed the rules as an egregious overreach."

                    You've really got to stop tricking poor sarcasmic, Pluggo. He already looks dumb enough.

                    1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

                      Maybe Shreek and Fatfuck agreed to spitroast Sarc if he white knights for them.

                  4. Sevo   1 year ago

                    turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
                    turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

              2. Sevo   1 year ago

                turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

              3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                I mean I gave you the stories to the parts responsible for the presidents. Trump expanded. Biden fought expansion. Yet you went after Trump. Lol.

                1. Sevo   1 year ago

                  It's certainly possible turd is stupid enough to not understand, but it's equally possible he does, but hopes others buy his misdirection.

                2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

                  stories = you made shit up

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    Umm. Those links are all valid retard.

                    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      He won't read his own links, why would anyone imagine Plugly would read others?

                    2. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

                      He’s too busy watching kiddie porn to read anything.

                  2. Sevo   1 year ago

                    turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
                    turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

              4. Sevo   1 year ago

                "...And Fatass Donnie has no say either..."

                When the lying pile of lefty shit isn't outright lying, he's trying misdirection.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    5. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      Remember you spent 2022 lying about the Biden economy?

      Repeatedly told us everything was terrific. Insisted dissatisfaction could only be the result of wingnut.com misinformation.

      By the end of the year, though, even MSM sites had to admit it: 2022 sucked. People were right to disapprove of #Bidenomics. Your gaslighting campaign failed.

    6. Knutsack   1 year ago

      https://usafacts.org/articles/is-the-us-energy-independent/

      This article says "since 2019". I guess it depends on how you define "energy independence".

      What definition is JP Morgan using?

  23. Super Scary   1 year ago

    “”A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?” wondered New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.”

    I hate how they have shifted the narrative to Biden being “old” instead of what he actually is, a stuttering and stammering dementia patient.

    1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      Incompetent, both in skill and mental faculties. But I expect this from Leftist propagandists.

  24. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    '"If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign, you're not going to have any more of those weak-kneed pundits suggesting he's not up to running for re-election," wrote Ezra Klein in the Sunday New York Times.'

    OK, Team Blue, you now have your updated official talking (and thinking) point. Stay tuned for further Biden image enhancements.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "Thinking points"... that's pretty apt.

  25. MatthewSlyfield   1 year ago

    "Look, I get it. Biden gave an objectively competent speech and the media love a comeback story. "

    Unless it's Trump.

  26. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    '"The message now is that the public is wrong and must be ignored, for the sake of democracy," writes Matt Taibbi in Racket News'

    The only way to protect (D)emocracy is to keep it as far away from the public as possible.

    Besides, Taibbi is a far-right MAGA Nazi. Just ask MSNBC.

    1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      Hey....it is (D)ifferent! 🙂

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'And finally, it was a historic night for Godzilla Minus One (a tremendous film with some very libertarian themes)'

    Let me guess. Is Godzilla a metaphor for Trump?

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Own goal, if so. 1. Who doesn't love godzilla, you may want him destroyed in the end but you still love the brute. 2. Blue Oyster Cult playing overhead at his next rally, A+.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        With a purposeful grimace and a terrible sound
        He pulls the spitting high tension wires down

      2. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        Blue Oyster Cult playing overhead at his next rally, A+.

        That other BOC song could play at the next Bides rally, A++.

  28. Sevo   1 year ago

    Didn't see who delivered the obligatory "ORANGEMANBAD" speech; perhaps they all did?

  29. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    Anyone else see Oppenheimer? I saw it in the theater, and a quarter of the audience walked out before it was over. I wish I had joined them. In my opinion it’s something to be used as torture in a terrorist holding cell, not something to win a bunch of awards.

    Watched Poor Things on Hulu last night. Liked it.

    1. ducksalad   1 year ago

      Thought it was OK. Most interesting thing to me was the appearances by almost all the top scientists of the 1930s and 1940s.

      My takeaway was the opposite of what the filmmakers intended. They wanted to portray Opp as a victim of McCarthyism. My opinion was the same Teller’s: Oppenheimer was a loyal American, but his continuing habit of hanging out with those who weren’t was a risk and showed poor judgment.

      Or shorter takeaway: “Don’t stick it in Marxist”.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        It also did a good job depicting how much pro-communist sentiment existed in that era, including among these top scientists.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Academia was a haven for communists as early as the 1920s, at least in America. Most of FDR's "Brain Trust" were comm-symps right out of the universities, and they and a lot of their predecessors had learned at the feet of German marxists in Berlin and other German colleges in the late 19th-early 20th century. That sentiment simply accelerated after World War II ended, when anything resisting marxism became labeled as "fascist" by these same people.

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      I thought Oppenheimer was great. I wouldn't cut a second out of the three hours. The dialog was superb. (reminds me of the wonderful 'Amadeus' which audiences hated too).

      Also liked 'The Holdovers'. Paul Giamatti deserved an award in any other year.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        95% audience score. Lol.

        https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/amadeus

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Plug: "the wonderful ‘Amadeus’ which audiences hated too

          "95% audience score. Lol."

          What do you want to bet that Plugly didn't watch either movie?

          1. Sevo   1 year ago

            We know that turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
            turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          The 91% audience score for oppenheimer also tends to undercut sarc's anecdote above about 25% walking out. Was he posted at the door tallying people up?

          Then again, sarc would never make up an anecdote would he?

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            If it is a personal anecdote it is 100% made up.

          2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            What reason would I have to make something like that up?

          3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            By the way, numbers like that 91% are what’s known as averages. Meaning some audiences loved it and some did not. They don’t mean that 91% of every audience liked the movie. I thought you were smarter than that. Guess I was wrong.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

              So you were posted at the theater door with a handheld tally clicker?

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                The place I go is a dinner and a movie joint. It’s got tables and chairs instead of stadium seating. So it’s pretty easy to see a group get up and leave, as several did during that movie. No I didn't count people. 25% was an estimate.

                1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                  Your anecdotes always sound so suspicious. A dinner theatre showing the latest in the box office instead of a musical or a classic?

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    We have dine in movie theaters too. Sits about 30 per screen. Drinks over priced, food sucks.

                    Have never seen someone leave even with terrible movies. Not cost effective as youre spending a lot for food and drink.

                    My guess is they got up to pee, sarc passed out drunk, didn't see them return.

                  2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    The ones that show musicals and classics don’t stay in business very long. I didn’t say fine dining. The most important thing is… they sell beer.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      They could have cut about 30 minutes out of Oppenheimer and it wouldn't have hurt the movie any; Nolan was being particularly self-indulgent with this one because he figured people would find the subject matter fascinating and sit through the whole thing.

      The book it's based on was pretty good, self-serving laments about "McCarthyism" aside. The fact of the matter is that there WERE a lot of cultural elites and government bureaucrats in the wake of WW2 that were vested in ensuring communism took over the US, and most of the arguments about "red-baiting" and "conspiracy-mongering" by these types are largely attempts at deflection.

  30. Sevo   1 year ago

    "New York Firefighters Investigated After Booing Letitia James"
    [...]
    "Afirefighters union in New York City reportedly chastised some members after boos and chants of "Trump" broke at an event featuring New York State Attorney General Letitia James, with an investigation underway to find those who took part.
    [...]
    "The behavior, the document continued, reflected poorly on the union's members and strained its relationship with James's office, and may have lost them the right to use the same venue for ceremonies in the future.
    "We want members to come forward," the document said in conclusion, directing leaders as to the next steps. "They will come to HQ to be educated why their behavior is unacceptable."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-york-firefighters-investigated-after-booing-letitia-james/ar-BB1jEf5Y?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=7c21d809705a4b38bd7e1d5f695e871a&ei=21

    Of course, there is no way pressure from the asshole James had anything to do with issuing the memo, and they left out "re" and "camp" in reference to 'education'.

    1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      next they'll be hunting down the guy who stopped clapping first.

      1. Anomalous   1 year ago

        She's Stalin with less of a mustache.

    2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      NY is a blue state paradise, Sevo. They're doing their best to imitate China.

  31. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

    Rand Paul throws his hat in the race for senate leader.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rand-paul-teases-senate-gop-leader-run-musk-says-i-would-support
    Endorsed by Musk and RFK Jr. so far. Tony Fauci could not be reached for comment.

    1. BYODB   1 year ago

      I'll have a party at my place if he wins. I had hoped for a Paul Presidency but I guess this will have to do.

      1. ducksalad   1 year ago

        Scenario #1: Paul as majority leader, POTUS Biden.
        Scenario #2: Paul as majority leader, POTUS Trump.
        Scenario #3: Paul as minority leader, POTUS Biden.
        Scenario #4: Paul as minority leader, POTUS Trump.

        I think Paul would be most effective in Scenario #1 where he could stop a lot of bad stuff and move his party in a better direction.

        In Scenario #2 we’d find out quickly that the two men have very different opinions about limited government and executive power, and neither has the personality to keep those differences private.

        Scenario #3 and #4 – Supermajority requirements that aren’t literally in the constitution are gradually being abandoned, so minority leader is not going to be worth a whole lot.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          In Scenario #2 we’d find out quickly that the two men have very different opinions about limited government and executive power, and neither has the personality to keep those differences private.

          And in an ironic twist Paul likely be called a leftist uniparty shill for opposing bigger government and expanded executive powers.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            The fucking irony here. You have attacked almost everyone of the Freedom Caucus who are almost exclusively those calling for spending cuts while becoming a return to neocons that never cut spending and always bent the knee when media got after then.

            Lol.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              I looked up ‘Freedom Caucus’ and saw the faces of a bunch of culture warriors. Wasn’t aware that they tried to cut spending when they weren’t going after trannies and librarians.

              Here’s something you won’t respond to or bookmark, because it’s about stuff not people, and contradicts everything you say about me.

              The federal government does not have an income problem. As a percentage of GDP the federal government is taking in more than ever. Peak Laffer Curve.
              The problem is spending. Not income.

              So, as should be said more often here…

              Fuck you! Cut Spending!

              1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                "I looked up ‘Freedom Caucus’"

                Oh wow.

                "and saw the faces of a bunch of culture warriors."

                CNN really has their hooks into you deep, huh?

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                And he proves my assertion lol.

                The federal government does not have an income problem. As a percentage of GDP the federal government is taking in more than ever. Peak Laffer Curve.
                The problem is spending. Not income.

                And you just attacked those who actually are trying to reduce spending calling them culture warriors you retarded fuck. Just like you complained about them during house speakership elections. They are the only ones demanding cuts and you hate all of them. While crying about the old GOP who never cut shit.

                Also is it a curve this time? Because you described a last time you discussed the Laffer Curve. Lol.

      2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        Might do more good as Senate leader, especially Senate majority leader. He'll get to decide what bills do and don't come to the floor. That may be the best thing we could hope for. A libertarian leaning conservative deciding what bills make it to the floor of the Senate.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Rand in that seat would be fucking hilarious, if nothing else because the GOP would gain a legitimate Tea Party opposition leader, rather than go-along-to-get-along type that "moves the ball forward" by moving the Overton Window further to the left.

  32. TangoDelta   1 year ago

    "An obviously doctored photo of Kate Middleton and her three children"

    Clearly the MSM has issues with someone else doing the doctoring of photos.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Probably AI generated. I'm surprised she wasn't portrayed as a POC.

    2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      Obsessing about things that do not matter.

  33. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Brennan says the IC won't give intelligence to Trump if elected.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cia-head-brennan-hints-intel-community-withholding-sensitive-info-trump-gets-nomination

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      No election interference here! Nothing to see!

    2. Ron   1 year ago

      The IC said they were going to quit doing that since Carter let the stealth planes out of the bag. And i;'m sure there is plenty they don't tell because any rational president would tell them to stop doing that. Actually i don't think teh government has been in charge of the IC since WWII when they got ride of Patton and worked with the KGB

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Well they got hand slapped then had a friendly congress basically bury programs like COINTELPRO.

    3. Minadin   1 year ago

      Brennan should be in or under Leavenworth.

      1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

        Marxists should be burnt at the stake.

    4. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      this feels insurrection-y

    5. CountmontyC   1 year ago

      The main thing that they won't tell him is how they are spying on him this time.

    6. shadydave   1 year ago

      Um, treason?

      1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        It is not quite that bad as he seems to suggesting Trump as a presidential candidate will not be briefed on very sensitive intelligence as what usually happens in an election year.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Schiff is also put there asking for dumbed down IC to Trump. It isnt like we had the DoD admitting to lying to Trump as president.

        2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

          It is not quite that bad as he seems to suggesting Trump as a presidential candidate will not be briefed on very sensitive intelligence as what usually happens in an election year.

          To be honest, this is actually worse. Considering the consequences if they were to refuse and Trump were to win the presidency, this indicates to me that the agencies already know there is no scenario in which Trump is allowed to take office.

  34. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

    Wait, you marxist retards in the press think a speech where Biden repudiates his own border policy and performance was good for him? JFC you dipshits don't live in reality anymore do you.

    1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

      They have t for a big long time now

  35. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Oops! One of the more striking moments during the Republican response to Biden's speech, delivered by Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, was a harrowing story about a woman who'd been kidnapped and repeatedly gang-raped by members of a Mexican drug cartel. Britt's speech attempted to tie the awful incident to the recent chaos along the U.S./Mexico border, but it actually happened nearly 20 years ago—and on the Mexican side of the border.

    Typical Republican liar.

    Blaming Biden for something that happened when the Bushpigs were in power.

    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      I've noticed that anti-immigration folks tend to use the fallacy of composition a lot.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Cite?

        Because it was you saturday claiming all immigrants were hard workers wanting to work despite the many citations you were given. The rest of us were showing the summation of costs.

        Immigration policy isn't individualized retard.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          That's quite the dishonest summary of what I said, oh Master Baiter.

          I'm not biting.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            No it isnt. Saturday. If I cite the posts will you forever leave?

            1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

              We won’t be that fortunate.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                He’ll probably spend the $25 just to be antagonistic here and not tell us.

      2. DesigNate   1 year ago

        Is it any different than the shit Democrats like shrike spew about entering The Handmaids Tale?

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          "They're doing it too" doesn't make it ok.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            This is such a weak defense for your teams hypocrisy.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              "Why don't you guys just bend over and take it like more principled conservatives!??"

          2. DesigNate   1 year ago

            Using your political enemies tactics against them is totally fair. Do you even Rules for Radicals brah?

        2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Fallacy of composition is when someone points to a group of immigrants and says "Hardly any of this group applied for work permits, therefore all immigrants just want welfare".

          A few do this, therefore they all do.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            And nobody made that claim, you just created a strawman to cover for your own ignorance on the topic. The link YOU were given was 2% did. Regarding refugees the data YOU were given was 70%

            Nobody used the word all. That is a fallacy you created to justify being ignorant. In fact you made the conclusive claim here.

            sarcasmic 2 days ago
            Flag Comment
            Mute User
            Anyone who says “Lazy Mexican” has never worked with a Mexican.

            You continue to ignore and deny the fact that they go on assistance because they can’t work.

            (This said when given proof they can work and very few applied)

            sarcasmic 2 days ago
            Flag Comment
            Mute User
            bro I think it’s abhorrent that immigrants are forced to go on assistance because of current policies that make it difficult to impossible for them to provide for themselves.

            (Again the collective assumption they all just want to work despite the data YOU were given)

            I could go on with your collective comments about those against the costs of illegal immigration. That was hilarious as well and even included you saying we should deport low wage Americans. Lol.

            1. I…….. Fudd   1 year ago

              It won’t matter what you post. Like Pedo Jeffy, Sarc is an open borders nut job. He thinks this makes him libertarian, as does Fatfuck.

        3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Or above "91% of people liked the movie which means sarc is lying!"

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      The TDS-addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

  36. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    Didn't watch the whole SotU, but saw enough clips on the news etc...Can Biden look and act any more like a liberal dunce version of Jeff Dunham's puppet Walter?

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      LOL! I couldn't put my finger on why squinty, angry Biden was so familiar. You nailed it.

  37. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >> writes Matt Taibbi in Racket News, where he

    does a really good job at his job.

  38. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Confronted with those facts during an appearance on Fox News over the weekend, Britt

    did the (D) thing and should be commended for her effort.

  39. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>and the filmmakers behind Zone Of Interest for their anti-war statements while accepting the best international film award.

    lol "refute their Jewishness" doesn't mean anything fuck those loser douchebags

  40. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>The document will call for higher corporate taxes, but it projects average budget deficits of $1.7 trillion for the next decade even with those higher revenues taken into account

    should the conjunction be and?

    1. DesigNate   1 year ago

      Color me skeptical of their rosy predictions when it comes to increased revenue.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        right I never even look at the numbers as numbers

  41. Dillinger   1 year ago

    also I don't remember any of my Evidence classes teaching it's okay if Congress does it and it's bipartisan.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!