Cheering From the Press Box
Also: Oppenheimer and Godzilla win at the Oscars, Virginia state lawmakers nuke plans for taxpayer-funded arena, and more...

There was plenty of cheering in the press box after President Joe Biden's combative State of the Union address. Many pundits rushed to declare that the event had altered the course of Biden's flagging re-election campaign.
"If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign, you're not going to have any more of those weak-kneed pundits suggesting he's not up to running for re-election," wrote Ezra Klein in the Sunday New York Times. Klein is at least engaging in a little self-deprecating wink there: The link in that sentence points readers to his own call, less than a month ago, for Biden to step aside.
Other reactions have been less self-aware. "People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted. "A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?" wondered New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.
Meanwhile, CNN's insta-polling showed that just 65 percent of viewers had a positive view of the speech. Before you object that 65 percent sounds high to you: It's the lowest figure CNN has recorded in the past quarter-century, according to The Washington Post.
"The message now is that the public is wrong and must be ignored, for the sake of democracy," writes Matt Taibbi in Racket News, where he provides a rundown of some of the more "hilariously ostentatious ass-kissing ceremonies" in the wake of Biden's speech, including from MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell ("just astonishing") and Mika Brzezinski ("an incredible moment").
Look, I get it. Biden gave an objectively competent speech and the media love a comeback story. And if you're someone who believes that Biden's historically low approval figures have more to do with the "vibes" than with any tangible policy, maybe it's tempting to go all-in on trying to shift those vibes.
For Times columnist Ross Douthat, the lack of establishment consensus for Biden's polling struggles explains "why, perhaps, there was a rush to declare his State of the Union address a rip-roaring success, as though all Biden needs to do to right things is to talk loudly through more than an hour of prepared remarks."
Is it possible that polls in the coming weeks will show a shift in voters' opinion of Biden's presidency as a result of the State of the Union address? Sure, but I'm going to be skeptical until I see actual evidence that Biden's speech mattered to anyone whose job doesn't require watching it.
Oops! One of the more striking moments during the Republican response to Biden's speech, delivered by Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, was a harrowing story about a woman who'd been kidnapped and repeatedly gang-raped by members of a Mexican drug cartel. Britt's speech attempted to tie the awful incident to the recent chaos along the U.S./Mexico border, but it actually happened nearly 20 years ago—and on the Mexican side of the border.
Confronted with those facts during an appearance on Fox News over the weekend, Britt suggested that the story should be taken seriously, if not literally.
Oscar night. Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer won big Sunday night at the 96th Academy Awards. The biopic about one of the inventors of the atomic bomb claimed seven awards, including best picture, best director, best actor (Cillian Murphy), and best supporting actor (Robert Downey Jr.).
Mstyslav Chernov—the director of 20 Days in Mariupol, which won for best documentary feature—delivered a moving speech in which he said he wished he'd never had a reason to make the film about the Russian military's destruction of a city in eastern Ukraine. Human Rights Watch estimates that more than 10,000 residents of Mariupol died during the first year following Russia's invasion.
"I wish to be able to exchange this to Russia never attacking Ukraine, never occupying our cities," Chernov said. "The people of Mariupol and those who have given their lives will never be forgotten because cinema forms memories and memories form history."
#20DaysinMariupol wins best documentary feature at the 2024 #Oscars pic.twitter.com/9YvoPqWKqR
— The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) March 11, 2024
Other highlights from the big night in Hollywood included another Oscar win for once-homeschooled musical superstar Billie Eilish and her older brother Finneas O'Connell for their song "What Was I Made For," written for the Barbie movie. I'll also applaud Murphy's acceptance speech for noting that the world still lives in Oppenheimer's shadow and dedicating his award "to the peacemakers everywhere," and the filmmakers behind Zone Of Interest for their anti-war statements while accepting the best international film award. And finally, it was a historic night for Godzilla Minus One (a tremendous film with some very libertarian themes), which became the first Godzilla movie to win an Oscar when it claimed the prize for best visual effects.
Scenes from Virginia: I might not have to pay for a stupid new arena! State lawmakers in Richmond appear likely to approve a state budget bill that does not include plans for a proposed $2 billion arena in Alexandria. The structure was supposed to be a new home for the National Basketball Association's Washington Wizards and the National Hockey League's Washington Capitals.
The hero of this story seems to be state Sen. L. Louise Lucas (D–Portsmouth), whom Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin has blamed for single-handedly stopping the arena deal. Lucas, who chairs the powerful Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee, told The Washington Post last week that she does not believe the proposed arena and its $1.5 billion in public debt are a good deal for taxpayers and that the teams' owner, Ted Leonsis, ought to pay for the stadium himself. Amen!
Update from Virginia: Last Monday, in this exact space, I noted that Youngkin had "refused to endorse [former President Donald] Trump (so far)." Two days later, Youngkin bent the knee.
QUICK HITS
- President Joe Biden will unveil his 2025 budget proposal on Monday. The document will call for higher corporate taxes, but it projects average budget deficits of $1.7 trillion for the next decade even with those higher revenues taken into account, The New York Times reports.
- Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he has "a big, big problem" with a bill that would legalize marijuana in the state.
- Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is leading a fight in the Senate to block more than 6,000 earmarks that would cost taxpayers over $12 billion.
- An obviously doctored photo of Kate Middleton and her three children distributed by the British royal family has stoked more conspiracy theories about the princess' recent absence from public view.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There was plenty of cheering in the press box after President Joe Biden's combative State of the Union address.
Hip hip hooray for amphetamines.
That's a pretty methed up thing to say about the leader of the free world.
Get off your high horse.
Horse is a downer, not an upper.
Power is a helluva a drug…along with stem cell derived HGH.
What a drag it is getting old
Biden's little helper.
Told you it wasn't Hunters cocaine in the lock box.
You know who else gave combative public speeches?
William Jennings Bryan?
William Travis (well, at least one).
John Paul Jones. Stephen Decatur.
Randy Macho Man Savage?
Patrick Henry?
Captain Kirk?
That. Would have. Been a. Rather. Combative. Speech.
If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign...
Joe Biden's body double is my president!
Does Hunter have enough coke and Ritalin to keep him propped up that long?
"People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted.
And he's just getting younger!
“A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?”
I think that might have been an Adderall-induced aneurysm.
"People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted.
Yeah, I was aksing "what kind of drugs did they feed Sleepy Joe tonight?"
Harris/Newsome 2024 right?
Other reactions have been less self-aware. "People yapping for so long about Biden not being up to the job look pretty dumb," CNN analyst Jon Harwood tweeted. "A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?" wondered New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.
Butt-licking toadies doing their job to help the Democrat incumbent, how shocking.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Britt's speech attempted to tie the awful incident to the recent chaos along the U.S./Mexico border, but it actually happened nearly 20 years ago—and on the Mexican side of the border.
They're not sending their best and brightest to DC.
Using the Marxist's lies against them when you fuck up. How many times have they taken hoaxes and declared that they at least "started a discussion" or that the story wasn't to be taken literally but as an example.
Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer won big Sunday night at the 96th Academy Awards.
I considered it a bomb.
Apparently, it went nuclear at the box office.
Stop acting like a little boy.
Why? Fat man Jeffy does that all the time.
While Oppenheimer did win Best Picture, it was a bit of a disappointment Fermi.
Did you have a meltdown?
He was radiating anger.
And Geiger was counting.
Hunting down the heroes of 9/11.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fdny-chief-vows-hunt-down-its-own-employees-who-booed-ag-letitia-james
And what happens when they are "caught"?
Apparently, they're up for "reeducation".
DEI sessions will continue until morale improves.
Firefighters “should understand that BITS is gathering video and identifying members that brought discredit … to the department,” the Sunday memo said. “We want the members to come forward. They will come to HQ to be educated [on] why their behavior is unacceptable.”
Two days later, Youngkin bent the knee.
They will all pledge for Trump or go the way of Amash or Meijer.
Or Flake or McCain; who needs Arizona anyway - bunch of losers.
Better that Arizona have a Lake than another Flake.
That lake needs to be filled first. A flake in the hand is better than two lakes in a bush or something.
...it projects average budget deficits of $1.7 trillion for the next decade even with those higher revenues taken into account...
I wonder what Biden will have to say for himself in 2034.
OK, made me LOL.
Finally.
"If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign, you're not going to have any more of those weak-kneed pundits suggesting he's not up to running for re-election," wrote Ezra Klein in the Sunday New York Times.
Is this the same Ezra Klein who declared Hillary Clinton is an extraordinarily talented politician in June 2016?
Months later, of course, Clinton would lose the Presidential election. To a hand-picked opponent. With no relevant political or military experience.
It's weird what happens when you say the quiet part out loud and insult half of the electorate. Especially after a decades-long career of being tone-deaf and unlikeable.
I don’t think Joe Biden can survive the steady diet of stimulants required to regularly reproduce the frantic mania he displayed at the SOTU. And it won’t have the intended result during a debate where he will have love pushback on his bullshit claims.
Does anyone seriously think there will even be a Biden-Trump debate? I'm surprised the Biden campaign hasn't already come out and said something along the lines of 'we won't give insurrectionists a platform.'
Give it time, he hasn’t “won” the DNC nomination yet.
Generally speaking, what's the point of even having debates anymore? The whole practice has been in decline ever since the Nixon-Kennedy debate showed that style > substance in the age of mass media. A candidate's positions are going to be generally well-known based on party affiliation, and debates are used mostly for snaps instead of actual policy discussion. You can't even get these people to shut their traps for 60 whole seconds so their opponent can lay out their own positions without interruption.
Put a bullet in the zombie format's head for good and quit wasting everyone's time.
Trump should also avoid debates like the plague.
His performance in the last set cost him, I think.
Any number of times when Biden was just about to wander off into dementia-induced ramblings, or was about to say something incredibly stupid, Trump just could NOT STFU for 5 seconds. He could not keep from bloviating at every single instance long enough to let Biden dig his own grave.
Mean tweets are one thing, but ceaseless harangues during the debates helped certify that Trump is a self-aggrandizing bully.
This season, Trump could probably do really well by just running ads showing Obama speeches on illegal immigration, Bill Clinton speeches on illegal immigration, Chuck Schumer speeches on illegal immigration from before they all 180'd "I'm Donald Trump, and I endorse this message." and then shut up.
That would be a brilliant ad blitz.
The rookie Trump strategically and tactically outplayed the veteran--her, the master politician and most qualified person to ever run for the office?! ("There has never been any man or woman more qualified for this office than Hillary Clinton," Obama said.)
And he is perhaps the most vilified person (and not without cause) ever to run for the office and before the election Mr. Obama had campaigned more for Democrat Hillary Clinton than any modern sitting president had for his party’s nominee.
And she still couldn't muster the win?
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he has "a big, big problem" with a bill that would legalize marijuana in the state.
A mellow Florida Man is an unamusing Florida Man.
Like with social media bans, he's probably just waiting for a better bill to come through.
Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is leading a fight in the Senate to block more than 6,000 earmarks that would cost taxpayers over $12 billion.
Where did this guy come from.
Oddly, the same state as the Turtle.
Kentucky? Or is the KY a brand endorsement - eg Bob Dole/Viagra?
"When [Speaker] Johnson is trying to ram down the the latest omnibus bill, I reach for a tube of good old KY."
Ha
Um, let's see - $12 billion divided by $3 trillion is, what - 0.0001% ?
Well, 0.4%. But what he'll actually succeed in getting cut will likely be closer to your number.
It isn't the $12B. It is that the $12B is used as an incentive to pass the other $10 Infinibajillions. As long as Senator Blowhard gets his bridge in New Peterdamn, he signs off on the bill that ramps up the CIA's budget instead of telling them to pound sand.
What a shock, Liz Cheney (D-TDS) lied and suppressed evidence during the J6 show trial.
https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/08/exclusive-liz-cheney-january-6-committee-suppressed-exonerating-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/
How much else was hidden?
Will we ever truly know?
Doubtful. We still can't access all the Kennedy files from the CIA and that was 60+ years ago.
In this case the democrats for J6 deleted the data and records they didn't hand pick.
Willful destruction of federal records? Thought that was illegal.
But it is (D)ifferent, I know.
Well, I for one, am shocked - shocked, to discover that Liz Cheney is a mendacious cunt.
"Your winnings, sir."
Acorn, tree...
Never go hunting with a Cheney.
Has anything they alleged turned out to be true?
Sicknick wasn't murdered.
There were no poop smears.
The FBI had as many as 200 undercover agents in the crowd. The NSA and DHS confessed to having agents in the crowd.
The video shows the Hill Police took down barricades, opened the doors and escorted protesters around.
The video shows both cops who testified under oath of being horribly injured by protesters were walking around fine and healthy hours after.
Many of the lawmakers who claimed they had to escape weren't present.
They didn't want to charge the only guy caught on camera calling for insurrection and an attack on the Capitol.
They haven't charged the guy clearly caught on camera planting pipebombs.
They haven't charged the two guys caught on camera breaking windows.
They haven't investigated the guys caught on camera erecting the "gallows for Pence" prop a full day before the protest.
Yeah, but youre a conspiracy theorist - sarc
I think he may still be sleeping off the quantity of alcohol he imbibed Saturday morning.
Non sequitur!
Ad hominem!
Fingers crossed for liver failure!
She somehow was offended and defending herself over the weekend. She is claiming the report said Trump didn't ORDER troops, which he is not allowed to do, and never made the claim of OFFERED.
I wonder what the reaction and spin would have been if he had TRIED to order troops to the capitol.
Authoritarian Hitler if you do, authoritarian Hitler if you dont.
See the reaction to suggesting in a NYT oped using national guard vs actually using the national guard in the subways. It’s just always (D)ifferent for some reason.
Saw that the NG members won't be carrying their rifles (for the most part) to make people feel safer. As one of the comments on the NYP pointed out, the US Army spends far more time training for BRM (basic rifle marksmanship) and thus are far more proficient with their long arms on average, than they do with their sidearms (in ten years, I never once qualified with the old M-9 Beretta, but had to qualify every year with my M-16 and I was in a medical unit, which had a far higher percentage of personal whose primary weapon would have been the M-9).
Also, it’s simple physics a 75 gr round, traveling at 2500 FPS out of a 16 or 20 inch rifled barrel is always going to be more accurate than a 140 gr round, traveling at 1250 FPS out of a five inch rifles barrel.
One of the people interviewed said they were worried someone might take the rifle away from the soldier and use it. First, that would be big mistake, because his buddy is going to double tap you if you tried that. Second, the way most soldiers sling their rifles across their chest these days makes taking the rifle away pretty fucking hard, and while you’re wrestling with the soldier (whose going to be fighting you every inch of the way, because weapon security is drilled into your head hard, ever want to fuck up the operation of a military post for several hours, misplace a weapon, everything basically shuts down until it’s secured) his buddies are going to double tap you.
An obviously doctored photo of Kate Middleton and her three children distributed by the British royal family has stoked more conspiracy theories about the princess' recent absence from public view.
The entire royal family is AI now.
Maybe the Irish do have a backbone after all.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/11/irish-voters-have-delivered-a-stunning-blow-to-the-establishment/
Well, that's the last time that they'll let the Irish vote on anything again.
I mean they voted yes on Brexit but Britain still operates at the behest of the EU. They will just ignore it and continue on.
Yes, but still the last time they let them vote on something like that again... and they will never-ever-ever let the Brits vote against the EU again.
I’ve said for years that the Brits should overthrow and execute their government.
The amusing part about this is that it's exactly what one gets from a 'democracy' and yet the very people who continually lecture us about democratic values suddenly get enraged when their top-down edicts get rejected by the very people they owe their jobs too.
Democracy isn't an unmitigated good, but it's hilarious to see people who claim it's the best thing ever get handed their hat by that very process.
Notably, consider that 65% of people is a moderate majority and 35% of Ireland was told to pound sand. That's...a lot of people in this case. It's the wolves deciding to eat the sheep.
The real answer has two parts: why are those definitions in a constitution in the first place, and any government which thinks those definitions are any of its business has too much power.
It is the Irish way.
Right now those definitions get used in Irish welfare programs. The hope by the state was to make the definitions meaningless to increase welfare for trans and others. They were pretty open about it.
Oh, I know why those definitions are there and why they wanted to change them. But they are hallmarks of statist control freaks.
Notably, consider that 65% of people is a moderate majority and 35% of Ireland was told to pound sand. That’s…a lot of people in this case. It’s the wolves deciding to eat the sheep.
Isn't it more like wolves trying to add shepherd's pie to the menu and the sheep who know the ingredients rejecting it?
The intellectuals trying to explain why the Irish electorate refuses to go along with their treason against society.
That’s impossible. As we all know, only populist and right leaning voters can attack democracy when they don’t win at the ballot box.
Vradakar's a typical Euromutt who was taught by western academia to despise white people. Ireland is about 90% white and has a leader who hates their guts.
Thank you Eric for a daily summary that's far better attuned to your target audience (assuming I'm in it) than those from recent authors.
If it isn't a sentence to hell, consider doing it all the time.
Do you mean that reluctantly, strategically, or both?
The target audience does not include the commentariat. Comments section is an embarrassment to the publication. Maybe they’re hoping that requiring people to pay will weed out the lying cunts. I think it will have the opposite effect. When they stay, nobody in their right mind is going to pay money to deal with their bullshit. I certainly won’t.
"Comments section is an embarrassment to the publication."
Does that include your comments?
Most of my comments are defending myself from said lying cunts. Not doing that anymore. They can pat themselves on each others backs, because I’m not signing up for Reason Plus. No fucking way in hell. Anyone remotely libertarian should do the same, because those ideas and principles are not welcome.
This is a lie. Youre often first in thread complaing about others and throwing shit against the wall. Such as this morning. Lol.
"Most of my comments are defending myself from said lying cunts."
Narrator: "But the real lying cunt was sarcasmic"
I can't think of a single claim by Jesse that can't be backed with evidence, but I can think of dozens of instances for you, just off the top of my head.
Wait….. then why are you still here?
These people seem to trigger you bigly, but it’s the 25 bucks that will cure you of your addiction to this place?
Have fun. Get a different hobby.
It’s not like they need me to argue with me. They can just state what they say I think and argue against it. When I participate all they do is call me a liar, tell me what they say I really think, and continue to rage against it. They can just keep doing that without me.
Man. Our little buddy is depressed we call put his ignorant bald assertions and hypocrisy out.
Better help . com
There you go buddy.
Will you try moving to glibertarians?
They have a flurry of activity in the morning and then mostly nothing. I do go there now and then, but it's not very interesting.
I remember that. He made big announcements of how he was leaving this place and that the Glibs were the only place for him, and then two weeks later he got punted and came back pretending that nothing had ever happened.
You left out the best part where, before his short-lived migration, he declared that chemjeff and White Mike were "probably the most libertarian" of regular commenters.
chemjeff, who once argued that refusal to get a COVID vaccine was akin to driving around with a bear in the trunk of your car.
That will never get old.
Pour sarc. Hopes him, jeff, and Mike are the true libertarians. Doesn't realize he is a useful idiot of the uniparty. Feel sad for him.
Sarc, do you understand that a you are a ‘lying cunt’, and an embarrassment to this or any other publication unfortunate enough to suffer your presence? Or has the alcohol done too much damage for you to understand such basic facts?
Bring back Liz Wolfe. Boehm the Birdbrain just doesn't make the grade, either reluctantly or strategically.
You don't enjoy commentary on the SOTU, Oscars, and British Royal family?
Only if it's snarky as hell. Apparently Jimmy Kimmel did what comes naturally and made a typcial ass of himself at the Oscars. Personally, I feel no need to watch a self-congratulatory circle jerk of progressives wanking each other off.
I watched exactly as much of the Oscars as I did the SOTU.
I didn't even know that they had one until just now. There's a lot of crap I watched in the 90's that I couldn't even imagine watching now.
Watched less because I did watch a few SOTU clips.
ditto
You were probably passed out in your garbage can by the time of the broadcast anyway.
“The hero of this story seems to be state Sen. L. Louise Lucas (D–Portsmouth), whom Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin has blamed for single-handedly stopping the arena deal.”
A Democrat unwilling to spend taxpayer money? I can’t buy that.
A Democrat who doesn’t want a Republican governor’s plan to go through because he’s a Republican? Gets my vote.
There is a big state and city fight going on for where the D C. Teams should move to in the area. My guess is he was payed to lose the move to Arlington by other state lobbyists.
I actually think it's hilarious how every team from Oakland has either left or is getting ready to leave soon.
No, teams aren't owed taxpayer-provided stadiums, but I don't blame them for leaving to places that will bribe them with such things, either. The main problem is that too much of post-WW2 American identity has been wrapped up on sportsball teams because there isn't anything else tying people together through civic or community relationships. It epitomizes American social atomization.
Minority Report come to life, eh.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/10/how-canada-became-a-cauldron-of-authoritarianism/
A reminder that, like many dictators, Trudeau's party lost the popular vote to the Conservatives in the last two elections. And unlike the US with its electors, Canada is a parliamentary democracy, so that matters.
What really needs to happen in Canada is the removal of Jagoff Singh. Get rid of Jagoff, and Justin fades away.
The white zone is for loading and unloading only...
There is no stopping in the red zone.
Enforcing all the laws that haven't been passed yet.
"...Trudeau’s government has proposed a new law that would give judges the power to put an individual under house arrest if they fear he might commit a hate crime. That’s right – might...
One of our resident lefty shits is happy with murder for same:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
Canadians should overthrow their government and burn this prick at the stake.
They're trying to punish "hate" because they know their ideology is deserving of such emotion.
What is obviously doctored about the Kate Middleton photo? Neither this sentence nor the X link tells me. Nothing jumps out at me, looking at the picture. Maybe her hands are too far from her body? Arms aren't that long? Anyway, maybe you could tell me instead of making me guess.
Kid's hand is doing some weird shit and the dutchess's legs look like they are from a 10 year old, among other oddities.
https://twitter.com/chrisshipitv/status/1766944328847364201
Her legs are fine, the camera flattens the perspective of the legs being extended slightly forward, which makes them look smaller. They also say Charlotte's hand doesn't line up with her sleeve but that appears to be a perspective issue too.
Not saying that it isn't shopped. Just that I can't see where and two examples given in the comments, aren't.
Couldn't say myself, although Middleton herself says it was doctored and it's implied she did it so...one assumes it had something to do with making her look better than she does since that's what 90% of people try to do with photoshop.
Not that I believe for a second that a princess is doing her own photoshop work, or that if she did it would be good enough to fool most people.
I couldn't help but think her daughter made an ok sign and that needed to be scrubbed least the SPLC see it.
I take it back, there is something wonky with Charlotte's sleeve.
They had to remove Joe sniffing the daughters hair. Give them a break.
Mother's Day portrait: From an 'empty space' where Charlotte's sleeve should be, to the Princess of Wales' 'misplaced' zip and the patterns on Louis' jumper
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13182189/Kate-Middleton-Mothers-Day-photo-problems-picture.html
I'm not sure about all of those, but the zipper thing was pretty obvious.
I thought about investigating this, but then it occurred to me that I really don’t care in the slightest.
America Has Achieved ‘Energy Independence’ For The First Time In 40 Years: JP Morgan
https://www.theautopian.com/america-has-achieved-energy-independence-for-the-first-time-in-40-years-jp-morgan/
When will Fatass Donnie stop lying about this?
He WON'T of course.
I mean most of that growth is off leases signed by Trump. How many has Joe signed? How many times has he lost in court trying to shut down energy?
Lol.
Wasn't energy independence announced under Obama and again in 2021?
Looks like the goalposts just got carried off.
Still doesn't understand the term. Rushes to defend shrike pretending this is due to Joe. Can't help defend Joe. Lol.
And because sarc will deny this.
Energy leases surged under Trump.
https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/oil-gas-permits-leases-surged-from-final-obama-year-through-trump-years-63204116
Leased property takes 4-5 years to produce at level.
Biden started canceling leases.
https://apnews.com/article/climate-business-environment-and-nature-91f740cbd9f5f872fcdee911ff5f8026
As well as pipelines and construction permits on new refineries.
Courts stepped in to block Biden's pauses on leases.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-climate-change-environment-and-nature-business-9751c4909a8b1baba28f3bcff9d5fa6e
Every step of the way Joe has tried to reduce energy extraction while shrike and sarc pretend he is responsible. The same shit was done under Obama.
The majority of growth is also on private and state lands where Biden has no say. But the useful idiot want to give undue credit to their hero. Lol.
The majority of growth is also on private and state lands where Biden has no say.
And Fatass Donnie has no say either. The growth is in the Permian and Bakken basins - not in Alaska which is where the politics are confusing you.
Do you know what percentage is on federal lands? That’s the only part the president can influence. I looked it up, and it's 24%. And all the president can do is approve or not approve new leases. So it doesn't look like the president can have a huge effect on total production. Which means Trump this and Biden that is just a red herring.
Which means Trump this and Biden that is just a red herring.
Of course it is. And that means Donnie is full of shit.
When oil/gas production soared during the Obama years it was due to fracking innovation.
On state and private lands, but he took credit.
Back when we had a semi honest media they even called him out on it. But you’ve given him credit as well.
https://apnews.com/5dfbc1aa17701ae219239caad0bfefb2
While it is true that Trump approving leases and Biden not approving leases had an effect, as a percentage of total production it's a mere distraction.
It never soared on public lands no matter how you and Sarc try to spin it, and Obama was against fracking if you want to remember.
Court strikes down Obama fracking rules for public lands
"A federal judge has struck down the Obama administration's rules for hydraulic fracturing on public lands, a victory for oil and gas producers and state regulators who opposed the rules as an egregious overreach."
You've really got to stop tricking poor sarcasmic, Pluggo. He already looks dumb enough.
Maybe Shreek and Fatfuck agreed to spitroast Sarc if he white knights for them.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
I mean I gave you the stories to the parts responsible for the presidents. Trump expanded. Biden fought expansion. Yet you went after Trump. Lol.
It's certainly possible turd is stupid enough to not understand, but it's equally possible he does, but hopes others buy his misdirection.
stories = you made shit up
Umm. Those links are all valid retard.
He won't read his own links, why would anyone imagine Plugly would read others?
He’s too busy watching kiddie porn to read anything.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
"...And Fatass Donnie has no say either..."
When the lying pile of lefty shit isn't outright lying, he's trying misdirection.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Remember you spent 2022 lying about the Biden economy?
Repeatedly told us everything was terrific. Insisted dissatisfaction could only be the result of wingnut.com misinformation.
By the end of the year, though, even MSM sites had to admit it: 2022 sucked. People were right to disapprove of #Bidenomics. Your gaslighting campaign failed.
https://usafacts.org/articles/is-the-us-energy-independent/
This article says "since 2019". I guess it depends on how you define "energy independence".
What definition is JP Morgan using?
“”A thought: the whole Biden-is-too-old thing was kind of a bubble, in the sense that people were buying it mainly because other people were buying it. Did Biden just burst that bubble?” wondered New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.”
I hate how they have shifted the narrative to Biden being “old” instead of what he actually is, a stuttering and stammering dementia patient.
Incompetent, both in skill and mental faculties. But I expect this from Leftist propagandists.
'"If the Joe Biden who showed up to deliver the State of the Union address last week is the Joe Biden who shows up for the rest of the campaign, you're not going to have any more of those weak-kneed pundits suggesting he's not up to running for re-election," wrote Ezra Klein in the Sunday New York Times.'
OK, Team Blue, you now have your updated official talking (and thinking) point. Stay tuned for further Biden image enhancements.
"Thinking points"... that's pretty apt.
"Look, I get it. Biden gave an objectively competent speech and the media love a comeback story. "
Unless it's Trump.
'"The message now is that the public is wrong and must be ignored, for the sake of democracy," writes Matt Taibbi in Racket News'
The only way to protect (D)emocracy is to keep it as far away from the public as possible.
Besides, Taibbi is a far-right MAGA Nazi. Just ask MSNBC.
Hey....it is (D)ifferent! 🙂
'And finally, it was a historic night for Godzilla Minus One (a tremendous film with some very libertarian themes)'
Let me guess. Is Godzilla a metaphor for Trump?
Own goal, if so. 1. Who doesn't love godzilla, you may want him destroyed in the end but you still love the brute. 2. Blue Oyster Cult playing overhead at his next rally, A+.
With a purposeful grimace and a terrible sound
He pulls the spitting high tension wires down
Blue Oyster Cult playing overhead at his next rally, A+.
That other BOC song could play at the next Bides rally, A++.
Didn't see who delivered the obligatory "ORANGEMANBAD" speech; perhaps they all did?
Anyone else see Oppenheimer? I saw it in the theater, and a quarter of the audience walked out before it was over. I wish I had joined them. In my opinion it’s something to be used as torture in a terrorist holding cell, not something to win a bunch of awards.
Watched Poor Things on Hulu last night. Liked it.
Thought it was OK. Most interesting thing to me was the appearances by almost all the top scientists of the 1930s and 1940s.
My takeaway was the opposite of what the filmmakers intended. They wanted to portray Opp as a victim of McCarthyism. My opinion was the same Teller’s: Oppenheimer was a loyal American, but his continuing habit of hanging out with those who weren’t was a risk and showed poor judgment.
Or shorter takeaway: “Don’t stick it in Marxist”.
It also did a good job depicting how much pro-communist sentiment existed in that era, including among these top scientists.
Academia was a haven for communists as early as the 1920s, at least in America. Most of FDR's "Brain Trust" were comm-symps right out of the universities, and they and a lot of their predecessors had learned at the feet of German marxists in Berlin and other German colleges in the late 19th-early 20th century. That sentiment simply accelerated after World War II ended, when anything resisting marxism became labeled as "fascist" by these same people.
I thought Oppenheimer was great. I wouldn't cut a second out of the three hours. The dialog was superb. (reminds me of the wonderful 'Amadeus' which audiences hated too).
Also liked 'The Holdovers'. Paul Giamatti deserved an award in any other year.
95% audience score. Lol.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/amadeus
Plug: "the wonderful ‘Amadeus’ which audiences hated too
"95% audience score. Lol."
What do you want to bet that Plugly didn't watch either movie?
We know that turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
The 91% audience score for oppenheimer also tends to undercut sarc's anecdote above about 25% walking out. Was he posted at the door tallying people up?
Then again, sarc would never make up an anecdote would he?
If it is a personal anecdote it is 100% made up.
What reason would I have to make something like that up?
By the way, numbers like that 91% are what’s known as averages. Meaning some audiences loved it and some did not. They don’t mean that 91% of every audience liked the movie. I thought you were smarter than that. Guess I was wrong.
So you were posted at the theater door with a handheld tally clicker?
The place I go is a dinner and a movie joint. It’s got tables and chairs instead of stadium seating. So it’s pretty easy to see a group get up and leave, as several did during that movie. No I didn't count people. 25% was an estimate.
Your anecdotes always sound so suspicious. A dinner theatre showing the latest in the box office instead of a musical or a classic?
We have dine in movie theaters too. Sits about 30 per screen. Drinks over priced, food sucks.
Have never seen someone leave even with terrible movies. Not cost effective as youre spending a lot for food and drink.
My guess is they got up to pee, sarc passed out drunk, didn't see them return.
The ones that show musicals and classics don’t stay in business very long. I didn’t say fine dining. The most important thing is… they sell beer.
They could have cut about 30 minutes out of Oppenheimer and it wouldn't have hurt the movie any; Nolan was being particularly self-indulgent with this one because he figured people would find the subject matter fascinating and sit through the whole thing.
The book it's based on was pretty good, self-serving laments about "McCarthyism" aside. The fact of the matter is that there WERE a lot of cultural elites and government bureaucrats in the wake of WW2 that were vested in ensuring communism took over the US, and most of the arguments about "red-baiting" and "conspiracy-mongering" by these types are largely attempts at deflection.
"New York Firefighters Investigated After Booing Letitia James"
[...]
"Afirefighters union in New York City reportedly chastised some members after boos and chants of "Trump" broke at an event featuring New York State Attorney General Letitia James, with an investigation underway to find those who took part.
[...]
"The behavior, the document continued, reflected poorly on the union's members and strained its relationship with James's office, and may have lost them the right to use the same venue for ceremonies in the future.
"We want members to come forward," the document said in conclusion, directing leaders as to the next steps. "They will come to HQ to be educated why their behavior is unacceptable."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-york-firefighters-investigated-after-booing-letitia-james/ar-BB1jEf5Y?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=7c21d809705a4b38bd7e1d5f695e871a&ei=21
Of course, there is no way pressure from the asshole James had anything to do with issuing the memo, and they left out "re" and "camp" in reference to 'education'.
next they'll be hunting down the guy who stopped clapping first.
She's Stalin with less of a mustache.
NY is a blue state paradise, Sevo. They're doing their best to imitate China.
Rand Paul throws his hat in the race for senate leader.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rand-paul-teases-senate-gop-leader-run-musk-says-i-would-support
Endorsed by Musk and RFK Jr. so far. Tony Fauci could not be reached for comment.
I'll have a party at my place if he wins. I had hoped for a Paul Presidency but I guess this will have to do.
Scenario #1: Paul as majority leader, POTUS Biden.
Scenario #2: Paul as majority leader, POTUS Trump.
Scenario #3: Paul as minority leader, POTUS Biden.
Scenario #4: Paul as minority leader, POTUS Trump.
I think Paul would be most effective in Scenario #1 where he could stop a lot of bad stuff and move his party in a better direction.
In Scenario #2 we’d find out quickly that the two men have very different opinions about limited government and executive power, and neither has the personality to keep those differences private.
Scenario #3 and #4 – Supermajority requirements that aren’t literally in the constitution are gradually being abandoned, so minority leader is not going to be worth a whole lot.
In Scenario #2 we’d find out quickly that the two men have very different opinions about limited government and executive power, and neither has the personality to keep those differences private.
And in an ironic twist Paul likely be called a leftist uniparty shill for opposing bigger government and expanded executive powers.
The fucking irony here. You have attacked almost everyone of the Freedom Caucus who are almost exclusively those calling for spending cuts while becoming a return to neocons that never cut spending and always bent the knee when media got after then.
Lol.
I looked up ‘Freedom Caucus’ and saw the faces of a bunch of culture warriors. Wasn’t aware that they tried to cut spending when they weren’t going after trannies and librarians.
Here’s something you won’t respond to or bookmark, because it’s about stuff not people, and contradicts everything you say about me.
The federal government does not have an income problem. As a percentage of GDP the federal government is taking in more than ever. Peak Laffer Curve.
The problem is spending. Not income.
So, as should be said more often here…
Fuck you! Cut Spending!
"I looked up ‘Freedom Caucus’"
Oh wow.
"and saw the faces of a bunch of culture warriors."
CNN really has their hooks into you deep, huh?
And he proves my assertion lol.
The federal government does not have an income problem. As a percentage of GDP the federal government is taking in more than ever. Peak Laffer Curve.
The problem is spending. Not income.
And you just attacked those who actually are trying to reduce spending calling them culture warriors you retarded fuck. Just like you complained about them during house speakership elections. They are the only ones demanding cuts and you hate all of them. While crying about the old GOP who never cut shit.
Also is it a curve this time? Because you described a last time you discussed the Laffer Curve. Lol.
Might do more good as Senate leader, especially Senate majority leader. He'll get to decide what bills do and don't come to the floor. That may be the best thing we could hope for. A libertarian leaning conservative deciding what bills make it to the floor of the Senate.
Rand in that seat would be fucking hilarious, if nothing else because the GOP would gain a legitimate Tea Party opposition leader, rather than go-along-to-get-along type that "moves the ball forward" by moving the Overton Window further to the left.
"An obviously doctored photo of Kate Middleton and her three children"
Clearly the MSM has issues with someone else doing the doctoring of photos.
Probably AI generated. I'm surprised she wasn't portrayed as a POC.
Obsessing about things that do not matter.
Brennan says the IC won't give intelligence to Trump if elected.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cia-head-brennan-hints-intel-community-withholding-sensitive-info-trump-gets-nomination
No election interference here! Nothing to see!
The IC said they were going to quit doing that since Carter let the stealth planes out of the bag. And i;'m sure there is plenty they don't tell because any rational president would tell them to stop doing that. Actually i don't think teh government has been in charge of the IC since WWII when they got ride of Patton and worked with the KGB
Well they got hand slapped then had a friendly congress basically bury programs like COINTELPRO.
Brennan should be in or under Leavenworth.
Marxists should be burnt at the stake.
this feels insurrection-y
The main thing that they won't tell him is how they are spying on him this time.
Um, treason?
It is not quite that bad as he seems to suggesting Trump as a presidential candidate will not be briefed on very sensitive intelligence as what usually happens in an election year.
Schiff is also put there asking for dumbed down IC to Trump. It isnt like we had the DoD admitting to lying to Trump as president.
It is not quite that bad as he seems to suggesting Trump as a presidential candidate will not be briefed on very sensitive intelligence as what usually happens in an election year.
To be honest, this is actually worse. Considering the consequences if they were to refuse and Trump were to win the presidency, this indicates to me that the agencies already know there is no scenario in which Trump is allowed to take office.
Wait, you marxist retards in the press think a speech where Biden repudiates his own border policy and performance was good for him? JFC you dipshits don't live in reality anymore do you.
They have t for a big long time now
Oops! One of the more striking moments during the Republican response to Biden's speech, delivered by Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, was a harrowing story about a woman who'd been kidnapped and repeatedly gang-raped by members of a Mexican drug cartel. Britt's speech attempted to tie the awful incident to the recent chaos along the U.S./Mexico border, but it actually happened nearly 20 years ago—and on the Mexican side of the border.
Typical Republican liar.
Blaming Biden for something that happened when the Bushpigs were in power.
I've noticed that anti-immigration folks tend to use the fallacy of composition a lot.
Cite?
Because it was you saturday claiming all immigrants were hard workers wanting to work despite the many citations you were given. The rest of us were showing the summation of costs.
Immigration policy isn't individualized retard.
That's quite the dishonest summary of what I said, oh Master Baiter.
I'm not biting.
No it isnt. Saturday. If I cite the posts will you forever leave?
We won’t be that fortunate.
He’ll probably spend the $25 just to be antagonistic here and not tell us.
Is it any different than the shit Democrats like shrike spew about entering The Handmaids Tale?
"They're doing it too" doesn't make it ok.
This is such a weak defense for your teams hypocrisy.
"Why don't you guys just bend over and take it like more principled conservatives!??"
Using your political enemies tactics against them is totally fair. Do you even Rules for Radicals brah?
Fallacy of composition is when someone points to a group of immigrants and says "Hardly any of this group applied for work permits, therefore all immigrants just want welfare".
A few do this, therefore they all do.
And nobody made that claim, you just created a strawman to cover for your own ignorance on the topic. The link YOU were given was 2% did. Regarding refugees the data YOU were given was 70%
Nobody used the word all. That is a fallacy you created to justify being ignorant. In fact you made the conclusive claim here.
sarcasmic 2 days ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Anyone who says “Lazy Mexican” has never worked with a Mexican.
You continue to ignore and deny the fact that they go on assistance because they can’t work.
(This said when given proof they can work and very few applied)
sarcasmic 2 days ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
bro I think it’s abhorrent that immigrants are forced to go on assistance because of current policies that make it difficult to impossible for them to provide for themselves.
(Again the collective assumption they all just want to work despite the data YOU were given)
I could go on with your collective comments about those against the costs of illegal immigration. That was hilarious as well and even included you saying we should deport low wage Americans. Lol.
It won’t matter what you post. Like Pedo Jeffy, Sarc is an open borders nut job. He thinks this makes him libertarian, as does Fatfuck.
Or above "91% of people liked the movie which means sarc is lying!"
The TDS-addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Didn't watch the whole SotU, but saw enough clips on the news etc...Can Biden look and act any more like a liberal dunce version of Jeff Dunham's puppet Walter?
LOL! I couldn't put my finger on why squinty, angry Biden was so familiar. You nailed it.
>> writes Matt Taibbi in Racket News, where he
does a really good job at his job.
>>Confronted with those facts during an appearance on Fox News over the weekend, Britt
did the (D) thing and should be commended for her effort.
>>and the filmmakers behind Zone Of Interest for their anti-war statements while accepting the best international film award.
lol "refute their Jewishness" doesn't mean anything fuck those loser douchebags
>>The document will call for higher corporate taxes, but it projects average budget deficits of $1.7 trillion for the next decade even with those higher revenues taken into account
should the conjunction be and?
Color me skeptical of their rosy predictions when it comes to increased revenue.
right I never even look at the numbers as numbers
also I don't remember any of my Evidence classes teaching it's okay if Congress does it and it's bipartisan.