Review: Is Saltburn an Eat-the-Rich Comedy? Not Quite.
Critics are misreading the movie. The wealthy are not the villains in this story.

After a not-quite accidental encounter, an unassuming Oxford student named Ollie (Barry Keoghan) befriends a popular classmate, the handsome and wealthy Felix (Jacob Elordi). Felix invites Ollie to spend the summer with him at Saltburn, his eccentric family's opulent mansion in the English countryside. Murder and madness ensue.
Critics correctly noted that Amazon Prime Video's Saltburn bears a striking resemblance to another film that depicts an ingratiating young man's quest for social acceptance (and it's a mild spoiler to mention this, so be warned): The Talented Mr. Ripley. But as far as the film's message is concerned, the critics wildly missed the mark, describing Saltburn as an eat-the-rich comedy that "skewers" the ultra-wealthy and rejoices in "class war."
This interpretation could not be more wrong. Felix and his family are not villains—they are victims of scheming outsiders who covet all they have and seek to destroy it. If anything, the rich people in the film are toonice and generous; they should have thrown Ollie out on day one. Forget Ripley; Saltburn has much more in common with the critically acclaimed but widely misinterpreted Parasite, in which a wealthy Korean household is preyed upon by a lower-class family (the eponymous parasites). Both films are, if anything, reactionary, something almost no one seems to have noticed.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
just watched the trailer…
it screams “meh” – not compelling to me at all
Also.. hate trailers like that. Hard to make anything of it.
Didnt see hints of 'eat the rich' and didnt see the parasite hints so cant comment on that part. Not surprising since I havent seen the movie. [not that lack of the full story has ever kept me from commenting authoritatively... 😉 ]
At least I can still comment (for now).
The day I can't comment is the day I stop reading.
the day all the best commenters stop commenting is probably the day i stop reading.
They provide much needed context and criticism to the posts here.
I saw the movie and can confirm Robby's analysis. As for whether or not *you* should see it? I'd say pass.
'This interpretation could not be more wrong. Felix and his family are not villains'
Get woke! If Felix and his family are wealthy, then they are villains. QED
Even worse... *whispers* they were white!
And in Parisite they were white-adjacent.
Hollywood has spent it's entire existence demonizing the wealthy, especially the wealthy in business. (Only legit wealth, apparently is to be a movie star). In fact, it's pretty easy to pick out the villain in the first few minutes of a film, by noting who runs a major corporation.
So yeah, easy to assume that this movie is an eat-the-rich comedy and so not bother even watching it when writing a review.
Not saying it's a good movie, just that even the worst movie is better than 99.97% of movie reviews.