Drive-Away Dolls Is an Underwhelming Lesbian Noir
A shaggy roadtrip comedy set against the backdrop of late 1990s right-wing family values politics fails to come together.

For much of their decadeslong career, filmmaker brothers Joel and Ethan Coen specialized in what might be called cartoon noir: Pictures like Blood Simple, Raising Arizona, Fargo, and Burn After Reading mixed painterly riffs on shopworn Hollywood thriller tropes with a flat-out silly Merrie Melodies sensibility. These movies were murderous—and hilarious.
The duo also took regional specificity seriously, or at least with sharply observed comic depth: Their movies were set in highly exaggerated versions of specific places at specific times, with special attention paid to local customs and folkways, and the odd characters who bummed around America's amusing local scenes.
This sort of existential, hyperviolent-yet-comic movie was all the rage in the world of 1990s indie filmmaking—see 2 Days in the Valley—and most of the entrées in the genre offered weak imitations of the Coen brothers' style. The magic of the Coen brothers was the ability to elegantly balance these disparate components. Somehow they all cohered into something approaching a worldview, or at least some very good movies.
Drive-Away Dolls, director and co-writer Ethan Coen's first narrative feature without his brother, aims for a similar blend of tone and elements: It's a noir-ish lesbian road movie set on the American East Coast in the late 1990s. There's a quirky comic vibe, a tour of a particular slice of America, and, yes, a murder or three. It's all very familiar, and in moments it almost comes together. But despite these moments, there's a flatness and even a tiredness to the proceedings, as the film circles gags and scenarios the Coens have done better when working together.
The movie begins in Philadelphia at the tail end of 1999, when an anxious man in a bar (Pedro Pascal) carrying a distinctive-looking briefcase is murdered in an alley outside a bar. The scene, probably the best in the movie, is a classic Coen brothers–style setpiece. It's shot like an especially goofy homage to black-and-white noir, with heavy shadows and exaggerated facial expressions that practically pause to wink at the audience. It's so elaborate, so cartoonish, Tex Avery and Friz Freleng would be jealous.
The movie is less successful, however, when it jumps across the city to a pair of 20-something friends, Jamie and Marian (Margaret Qualley and Geraldine Viswanathan), who, after some introductory hijinks, end up on a road trip in a beat-up car headed down the East Coast. They've acquired the car via a "driveaway" service, in which their job is to deliver the car to Tallahassee, Florida. But it turns out the car has an unusual package in the back—the case from the opening scene—and there are powerful actors out to get it back.
Mostly this is an excuse for Jamie and Marian to take a shaggy, ironic tour of America's I-95 corridor during the tail end of the Clinton era, viewed through the lens of the era's unsettled gay culture: Jamie has just broken up with her girlfriend, and the two stop at lesbian bars along the way while heading for an inevitable romantic entanglement. Yet there's bigotry in the air, in the form of ubiquitous highway billboards for a family values senator played by Matt Damon. Meanwhile, the pair are chased by a couple of shady, intermittently violent characters, Arliss and Flint (Joey Slotnick and C.J. Wilson), overseen by their slick boss, Chief (Colman Domingo).
If this sounds like exactly the sort of loopy, scattered premise that the Coen brothers specialized in bringing together—well, yes, it does. But the lone Coen brother, who co-wrote the script with Tricia Cooke, struggles to put the pieces together: The discursive comic dialogue comes out flat and psuedo-quirky; the blend of comedy and violence feels like a tic; the constantly arguing bad guys play like second-rate ripoffs of the Steve Buscemi/Peter Stormare hitman duo from Fargo. There's a should-be-interesting attempt to view the gay culture of the late '90s East Coast as another distinctive American scene, a quirky little subculture to be explored and gently caricatured while acknowledging the right-wing, socially conservative politics of the era. But the movie's reflexively snarky posturing and penchant for ha-ha randomness means it struggles to land a point.
All too often, Drive-Away Dolls plays like a parody of a Coen brothers movie, an outdated homage by an especially talented copycat. It's a '90s throwback alright—not to the Coen brothers' best work, but to the procession of imitators who took their cues from the brothers. Drive away, drive away.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The 90s were “right wing” now?
I guess anything short of mandatory drag queen story hour is right wing
LOL, that was my reaction when I saw the line. What exactly the fuck about the 90s, especially the late 90s, was socially conservative? There was gay shit being promoted and celebrated everywhere, especially in the mass media--hell, Hillary Swank even won an Oscar for portraying a pooner.
Yeah, pretty much every young actress and musician was at least hinting at being into other chicks.
geez, even the president was getting blowies in the oval office, and plenty of people were dismissing it as "Well, a blowjob isn't sex."
LOTS of women my age -- an I'm GenX, that was MY youth -- said they were Bi, and some of it even tried it on. It was a thing. Nobody had given a shit if gays were gay for years. The PC era from a decade before had swung the pendulum HARD, enough that the Man Show ended each episode with Girls on Trampolines, shock jocks were common and constantly trying to one up each other, you could say dirty words on TV and the radio (that didn't get clamped down upon until the nipplegate superbowl incident), Shows like Sex and the City were on television. Literature was full of bad-boy writer types, sexual and dark themes pervasive without any censorship.
Oh, you could also travel without being vetted by the government, police had to actually get a warrant to snoop on your phone or track you, and courts were public not secret. Even the written press still had actual "I like free speech" liberals writing, regardless of their slant.
How old is this author? 30? He's definitely not old enough to have actually experienced the 90s as an adult. I can say that.
Suderman is 51 years old. Like most of Reason he lives in a delusional left wing bubble.
Oh, geez. Can't even attribute it to the casual arrogance of youth. He's just fucking stupid.
Certainly in the media worlds of TV and film and up-coming Cyberspace, but real world North Carolina was very different.
In Shelby, NC in the mid-Eighties, a Gay couple was murdered outside an adult bookstore by members of Frazier Glenn Miller's White Patriot Party.
In Charlotte, NC in the Nineties, Reverend Joe Chambers and Religious Right Muckety-Mucks in local government like Bill James and "Heil" Hoyle Martin were wanting the District Attorney to prosecute and jail performers of the play Angels in America, even though it was strictly for an adult audience.
Rev. Joe also campaigned in the late Eighties against showing kids Masters of the Universe characters He-Man and She-Ra, saying they encouraged both Secular Humanism and Witchcraft. (???)
NC also still had Sodomy and "Crime Against Nature" laws and had an anti-porn law so vague that video stores were scared to show posters of Daryl Hannah promoting Splash.
As Paul Harvey sagely observed: "The 'Good Old Days'...weren't...always...good!"
Needless to say, I came to my Atheism and zeal for Separation of Religion and State quite honest.
“In Shelby, NC in the mid-Eighties”
Mid 80s.
“Bill James and “Heil” Hoyle Martin were wanting the District Attorney to prosecute and jail performers”
Were wanting.
“Rev. Joe also campaigned in the late Eighties”
Campaigned in the 80s.
“Needless to say, I came to my Atheism”
Nobody gives a shit.
You’ve reached Lying Jeffy level of bullshit.
Well the Eighties was Nineties-adjacent and time didn't move too fast in NC and still doesn't move fast enough for my Singularitarian tastes.
And you wouldn't know bullshit if you were in middle of the Chicago stockyards, R Not-Mac.
The 90s were “right wing” now?
The 90s were so right-wing that Hillary Clinton and Tipper Gore were affluent, white, female, liberal *and* neo-puritanical!
I am amazed that a hackneyed remake of a time that did not exist to lecture on how evil that the time that did not exist was (had it existed) is simply not very good.
I once respected writers.
Here's a challenge: Read the Grapes of Wrath with precisely that attitude.
We had to read that shite in school, and my literature teacher presented it as though it was true history. It's about as true a picture of California as Galt's Gulch was of Colorado.
Difference is, nobody tried to pass off Galt's Gulch as true history.
It is annoying, and lazy story telling, and surprisingly common. But I expect no better from a modern CRT/DEI addled Hollywood, even with a Coen at the helm.
Fun fact: Abe "The Railsplitter" and Mary Todd Lincoln gave birth to their 3rd son 10 mos. after their second son died at the age of 4.
Now, I've got enough game with Mrs. Casual that I feel pretty confident saying we could've conceived Irish Twins and I've got an oops kid 16 mos. younger than his brother to back it up. I can't imagine pulling off "Hey baby, I know you've only got like a 90% chance of surviving to begin with, and I know our 4 yr. old just died a few weeks ago, but let's have another one!"
A poem by Abraham Lincoln published in his biography in 1889:
For Reuben and Charles have married two girls,
But Billy has married a boy.
The girls he had tried on every side,
But none he could get to agree;
All was in vain, he went home again,
And since that he's married to Natty.
Again, this is Abraham Lincoln, Republican, the stodgy, prudish, old time-y, lawyer who succeeded James Buchanan, Democrat, and looking positively "frat bro" by modern standards compared to James "Is he a celibate metro or gay?" Buchanan.
A rumor was started that Catherine the Great died fucking a horse and, at some point, people believed it. This little tale of an of-no-particular-interest lesbian tryst up and down the "conservative" East Coast of the 90s isn't ground breaking.
Drive-Away Dolls Is an Underwhelming Lesbian Noir
Sounds like what a homophobe would say.
Adds to the unshaven shaggy lesbian genre
Should have made them hotter. Nobody wants to watch realistic lesbians, not even lesbians.
i thought the shaggy referred to their prominent eyebrows and... maybe some other parts that werent depicted in the photo
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner
Most of America envisions Hooter Girl's getting it on. Real life is not so great.
The presence of Margaret Qualley alone makes this a skippable experience. That actress is an absolute black hole of screen charisma.
But the movie's reflexively snarky posturing and penchant for ha-ha randomness means it struggles to land a point.
So Coen and his wife are in the stage of their career now where they aren't actually doing anything creative, just indulging in their own self-referential stew. The absolute marinade of ironic detachment and Joss Whedon-style quippy dialogue that a lot of indie 90s comedy productions soaked in hasn't aged particularly well, and doing a fun-house version of a 90s movie just drives that home even further.
lesbians are entertaining absolutely zero percent of the time.
You aren’t watching the right… ummm… "films"?
hetero babes mashing for money is not same thing.
Lest we forget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Uf7gXduLk
perfect and hilarious reminder. gracias.
But they're shaggy!
You've not seen "Bound" I take it.
Gina Gershon is a badass ... and from what I know prefers the company of men. Jennifer Tilly too.
Ah, but in the film...
And I am sure that there are lesbians in Hollywood past and present who you have been entertained by, not knowing.
Did you not like Kelly McGillis in Top Gun? Maria Bello in History of Violence?
Kelly McGillis about wrecked Top Gun (and still appeared publicly with men at the time)
"Kelly McGillis in Top Gun"
Just looked her up to see what she looks like nowadays... I shouldn't have done that.
Also, McGillis was married to a man and used to pursue only men. She may have come out as a "lesbian" but she's definitely bisexual.
Fair enough. Perhaps working with Tom Cruise did it.
More likely Jodie Foster on "The Accused".
She may have come out as a “lesbian” but she’s definitely bisexual.
And, per your prior comment, assuming "I'm no longer hot. I need to do something to attract attention."/"I'm no longer famous or attractive. I give up." isn't a sexual orientation.
The number of actresses who came out in the 90s or 00s only to quietly go back to dating men, because it's not fabulous enough for the tabloids to report on people going back straight is non-zero.
”I’m no longer
famous orattractive. I give up.” isn’t a sexual orientation.Dammit, that was my go to! What with my advancing years and the fact that, for Lent this year, I gave up hope.
Guess I'm back to being a boring hetero.
To be clear, it wasn't meant as any sort of insult, just and acknowledgement of reality.
My 30-something DINK cousin just broke up his marriage recently with a 20-something personal trainer. Mrs. Casual said she'd kill me if I did something like that. My reply was "While I won't deny that it sounds like fun. At my age, with kids and everything else. Pulling down a 20-something personal trainer sounds like a lot of work." to which she replied, "Yeah."
I could see how, for someone like McGillis, between all the incels, cat ladies, "Boston Marriages", and "lesbian bed death", you could exploit (the perception of) your sexuality to prolong your career and wind up in a place where, even if you preferred pulling down 20-something personal trainers, you recognize that it's not going to happen without a lot of work and/or that what you've got is easier or a better fit.
And that there are other female celebrities who have come out as lesbian or bi or who admit to having experimented or whatever and subsequently went back to men but, as indicated, you generally won't find or know about because nobody compiles (and search engines won't return) "Top 10 Celebrities Who Were Gay But Aren't Now" lists the way they compile the "Top 10 Celebrities Who Are Gay" lists.
Indeed you shouldn't. I can't remember what it was I saw her in and I thought, she reminds me of someone - but I didn't recognise her. Contrast with say Sophia Loren or Helen Mirren
To her credit, she wasn't sour about not being invited back for the sequel. She even stated that she understood it was because she was old and fat.
Plus, going with Penny Benjamin was a nice call-back to the first movie.
I assume the discussion is about Bound. I agree with your original assessment. Maybe if the film had come out before Basic Instinct it would have something going for it other than “OMG! Lesbians!” but it didn’t so it doesn’t. Instead, it’s got Gina Gershon laying on a bed in tightie whities playing a Jew’s harp making the movie less interesting than if Clive Owen were playing Tilly’s love interest:
Basic Instinct – IMDB rating 7.0 (“But the vag scene makes it epic!” – fan
boipersons) Bound – IMDB rating 7.7 (“But the lesbians makes it epic!” – fangirlzpersons) Sin City – IMDB rating 8.0 (“Clive Owen couldn’t out-act a plank of wood and Jessica Alba, Bruce Willis, and Mickey Rourke play themselves in all their films and Rodriguez and Miller still manage to make a better movie than either of the other two without lesbians or twat shots” – mad.casual)Basic Instinct – IMDB rating 7.0 (“But the vag scene makes it epic!” – fanboipersons)
Bound – IMDB rating 7.7 (“But the lesbians makes it epic!” – fangirlzpersons)
Sin City – IMDB rating 8.0 (“Clive Owen couldn’t out-act a plank of wood and Jessica Alba, Bruce Willis, and Mickey Rourke play themselves in all their films and Rodriguez and Miller still manage to make a better movie than either of the other two without lesbians or twat shots” – mad.casual)
Goddamned busted-ass edit function.
>>Rodriguez and Miller still manage to make a better movie than either of the other two without lesbians or twat shots
this is beautiful.
I deffo think that Sin City is much better than Bound or Basic Instinct (which IMO is crap). Rosario Dawson is worth a mention, but she's a very good actress unlike some of the others. And Benicio del Toro is always good value.
Clive Owen is a presence more than an actor, and he's good at that. He was being trailed in some quarters as a possible James Bond, but he'd have been more suited to Harry Palmer.
Ackshuyally, to anyone outside of the circles of Herr Misek, Mtruman, JFree, Nardz, and Goldie, that musical instrument is called a Jaw Harp.
Janine Lindemulder was making some pretty good movies in the 90s. Although technically I think she’s bi.
yes. and it's not the lesbian in the actor/director it's the lesbian theme being thrown at me. lesbians might be entertaining, but they aren't entertaining for being lesbians
^^ I could have been more precise initially lol
LOL. I stick by "Bound" as far as the theme goes.
I also give you "The Vampire Lovers", with the splendid Ingrid Pitt. A typically tasteful and high-end Hammer Films production.
nothing ever went wrong when Ingrid Pitt was around.
I think that for many Englishmen of the right generation, we will always have a place in our hearts - or elsewhere - that belongs to Ingrid Pitt and Caroline Munro.
I disagree. And I’m beginning to tire of repeatedly proving you wrong. 🙂
Edit: Acknowledged amendments to your statement, and agree.
that dude with the long hair & red shirt was terrible at covering up.
Even the blue guy's skills looked a bit more "I watched all 6 Rocky movies at a Holiday Inn Express last night." than "I was a local Golden Gloves champ."
this.
Especially now with the approved elites policy of, as South Park has given us, "put a chick in it and make her lame and gay"
“see 2 Days in the Valley”
Helga Svelgen was one of the greatest movie characters of all time.
Mentioned above, but....the late '90s...the right-wing, socially conservative politics of the era
WTF are you talking about? Were you alive in the 90s?
Nobody is answering the important question. Do they get naked?
Dude, Qualley doesn't look good with her clothes on--taking them off would probably require eye bleach.
Considering the hazards you just raised - that makes it an even more important question.
I question your mental competence for asking that
Criticism of a married President banging a 22 year old intern = "socially conservative."
… in the White House … and lying about it ... and getting explicitly impeached for the lie.
Here me out here...
Sydney Sweeney and Dakota Johnson make up for that trainwreck of a film they put out, by spending 60-80 minutes showcasing lesbian love. Thats a lesbian film we can all get behind.
'Madame Muff'?
I was thinking of a female spy..."the name's Muff. Muff Diver". I mean, it's not much further than "Pussy Galore".
How could you get further than pussy galore?
Alotta Vageena?
Ivanna Humpalot?
Thats a lesbian film we can all get behind.
Either dump Dakota Johnson for Isabela Merced, just add Isabela Merced, or no deal. To me Dakota Johnson is kinda in that Kathy Griffin/Maggie Gyllenhall/Sarah Jessica Parker space where every time I see her, I feel like somebody accidentally let one of the body doubles have the lead role.
I don't think I have agreed with a post of yours more than this. These are actresses whose celebrity - particularly when they're being represented as having some kind of sex appeal - I do not get.
FWIW I have it on semi-reliable authority that SJP got her break because she provided "services" to James Woods.
A film about lesbians fighting against the right wing or something? Appealing to .05% of the population? Wonder why it's a bomb like the woke Marvel movies that suddenly showed up
My big let-down with Suderman is that he didn't mention the Coen Brothers magnum opus, Oh Brother, Where Art Thou. Hilarious Appalachian rendering of The Odyssey and a million laughs!
Thanks for your information, it was really very helpfull in south africa..
short term loans