The Biden Administration Has Forgiven Another $1.2 Billion in Federal Student Loans
This new wave of forgiveness shows how Biden can keep canceling student loans, even after his defeat at the Supreme Court last year.

On Wednesday, the Biden Administration announced $1.2 billion in additional student loan forgiveness for more than 150,000 borrowers. This particular round of forgiveness was previously announced last month, though the exact cost of the debt relief was not previously known.
"The Biden-Harris Administration has now approved nearly $138 billion in student debt cancellation for almost 3.9 million borrowers through more than two dozen executive actions," a Wednesday press release stated. "From Day One of his Administration, President Biden vowed to fix the student loan system and make sure higher education is a pathway to the middle class—not a barrier to opportunity."
This latest slate of forgiveness is part of the Education Department's sweeping changes to how the federal government handles student loan repayment. As part of the Biden Administration's original attempt to forgive up to $20,000 in federal loans per borrower, they also made several major changes to other student loan programs. Most notably, they introduced the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE), a new income-driven repayment (IDR) program designed to be much more generous than previous IDR plans.
For example, under the REPAYE plan, which was the most popular IDR plan before SAVE replaced it, monthly payments were set at 10 percent of borrowers' discretionary income, defined as earnings above 150 percent of the federal poverty line, with forgiveness coming after 20 years of consistent payments.
For borrowers in the new SAVE plan, their monthly payment is only 5 percent of their discretionary income, which is now defined as income above 225 percent of the federal poverty line. If the borrower's balance is less than $12,000, they'll now get forgiveness after just 10 years.
As part of the SAVE plan rollout, the Education Department announced last month that any borrowers who have been paying back their loans for 10 years or more, under any program, and have a remaining balance of less than $12,000 can enroll in the SAVE plan and get automatic forgiveness. While the original announcement did not estimate how much forgiveness would be dolled out, Wednesday's update released the staggering $1.2 billion price tag.
This recent glut of loan forgiveness shows how, even if Biden's attempt at blanket loan forgiveness was defeated at the Supreme Court last year, that doesn't keep his administration from spending billions on student loan forgiveness. Biden's one-time student loan forgiveness proposal was estimated to cost taxpayers more than $500 billion, but the estimated cost of the SAVE plan over the next decade is almost as much, coming in at $475 billion.
While the Supreme Court halted Biden's most outrageous attempt to forgive massive amounts of federal student loans, the Education Department's wide authority to make sweeping changes to student loan policy means that widespread debt forgiveness—and the huge bill to taxpayers—is here to stay.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Biden is still not a dictator, though?
I would say fascist, but this specific action certainly fits dictator.
No, Fascist works, as used by the left. In their efforts to paint the right as fascists they have always pushed the "militarism" aspect of Fascism. If Joe Biden hasn't set new records military spending and support for states involved in active war without even trying to negotiate for peace then someone needs to tell me which American President does hold that record.
Yep, "fascist" is a label for mean people who might be Nazis and likely support Trump, and totally not for activist government fans who want to macro- and micro-manage all businesses and the economy.
The origin of the word 'tyrant' is precisely about debt forgiveness and it generally was not seen as a negative. The debtor - creditor conflict has been around since the beginning of agriculture and domestication of animals and 'civilization'. That conflict will always tilt towards creditors over time because the math of compound interest increases faster than the growth of productive capacity to pay that debt. The τύραννος is just the guy who comes to power promising to restore the original balance of power - towards restoring people to their land, away from debt peonage, towards infantry/militia, away from creditors/cavalry/mercenaries. That was a regular part of all new dynastic kings and law codes - from the Code of Ur-Nammu through Hammurabi and then, after the Babylonian exile, where it was post-facto codified as Jubilee Year. The conflict remained thoughout the Greek and Roman era and remains today. Except that over time the creditors won, imposed their opinion of who/what might be responsible for debtors to win (only tyranny), and there hasn't been a debt jubilee for millennia.
Now consider why there hasn't been a debt jubilee.
When debt forgiveness is known to be coming, lenders have no incentive to make loans. They hoard their capital rather than putting it up for confiscation. The net result for society is less money in circulation, less risk-taking and ultimately a lot less prosperity.
The only way a debt jubilee works is if it's exceedingly rare and random. When debtors and lenders learn to expect it, that biases both their behavior in highly non-productive ways.
But what if only debts held by leftists were forgiven?
Oh, right, we already do that.
consider why there hasn’t been a debt jubilee.
Mostly it is because those who advocate one get killed. Before they can even get a civil war or rebellion going. This is why the word 'tyrant' is thrown at them early. Those who succeed become that tyrant. Those who don't become dead. The opposition from creditors is not reasonable. It is deadly.
First - debt jubilees only cover loans that are either personal or where the collateral has already been foreclosed on. Basically - loans by the rich to the (now) poor.
Second - if wealthy creditors aren't interested in lending to the poor or risky, then so what. The former aren't doing the latter any favors. And, more significant, those places with debt jubilee have an ability for the state to pay-in and be-paid-in-kind. It is the poor who benefit from that option. The wealthy prefer that everything be denominated in currency because that's what they control. An eg is nightwatchmen v paid police. If nightwatchmen are just militia duty, then those who are spending their time are the ones who decide on the routes. If instead the police are paid, then those who are paying the police decide on the routes.
Third - re that latter example. Imagine the Civil War. The Union has paid soldiers in greenbacks. After the war, those soldiers will go back home and produce wool, wood, steel, leather, grain, oats, lead. The exact things, along with the Union soldiers time/effort, that won the war. That meant the soldiers themselves would become the creditor - iff the soldiers were free from debt peonage. The govt could/should have denominated those greenbacks in the same commodities the Union had borrowed/purchased during the war. Not freaking gold which was only useful for JPMorgan and the $300 boys to avoid serving.
Further, a lesson from an ancient Greek - Aeneas Tacticus - insolvent debtors are very dangerous adversaries to have sitting by, watching for their opportunity. - could have been quite useful. Imagine the Emancipation Proclamation had said something like - the enslaved in rebellious states can come to Union lines and pick up arms and ammo and return home to the land they can claim as their homestead paid for with the five+ years of labor they have already worked. Well the Civil War between Union and Confederacy would have ended that day. Sometimes - creditors don't offer much to a wars outcome. But of course, Lincoln would also have been assassinated earlier.
The US has reverted to the historical mean.
Dictatorship where power is used to crush your enemies and reward and empower your allies.
The best way to reduce costs and get rid of useless degrees is to not subsidize them with generous federal funding in the form of Federal Student Loans, which provides a feedback-free perverse profit motive for the universities currently. Private lenders will not be so quick to give out the same loan package to a gender studies major as an engineering student.
Side benefits: Future students will either get useful degrees, not be saddled with crippling debt upon graduation, or some combination of both. People at universities that don't contribute to bringing in money (DEI administrators, useless departments) will be cut.
Indoctrination centers. Education is not a factor.
I see no evidence of any greater education benefits based on the graduates that I know. Makes this seem like an even worse deal.
The better way is to stop employers from using degrees (good and bad) as a cheap (to them) way of filtering out employees. Degrees no longer mean anything because everybody has one; and most of those that have them only go them because it was said that they couldn't get hired without one. If employers stopped make arbitrary degree hurdles to jump over and actually took the time to see if an applicant was worth a darn, most people wouldn't even seek degrees unless they wanted to teach the subject the degree is in.
Corporate America made it mandatory to have one to get hired for "a good job".
"Degree inflation—the rising demand for a four-year college degree for jobs that previously did not require one—is a substantive and widespread phenomenon that is making the U.S. labor market more inefficient. Postings for many jobs traditionally viewed as middle-skills jobs (those that require employees with more than a high school diploma but less than a college degree) in the United
States now stipulate a college degree as a minimum education requirement, while only a third of the adult population possesses this credential."
Harvard Business School
https://www.hbs.edu/managing-the-future-of-work/Documents/dismissed-by-degrees.pdf
I shouldn't have said everybody has one, that is hyperbole. But I'm not going to fight the Reason posting-bot over correcting my post without changing the formatting.
Where does the money come from? Discretionary funds in the executive branch?
It doesn't. Technically, this is money not coming in, not money going out.
What that means is we'll just have a larger deficit than planned. I was going to say "anticipated" but honestly, I expected nothing less.
The money did go out. Now it's not coming back in as repayment.
Issues Democratic voters only pretend to care about: occupying Wall Street, drinking billionaire tears, opposing neocon foreign policy, protecting Palestinians, dismantling the military / industrial complex
Issues Democratic voters actually care about: "accessing" their next abortion, making other people repay their loans
It might be indefensible from a libertarian POV, but Biden's handlers know what they're doing.
Nailed it! Plus destroying private businesses, killing Jews and Catholics and- as honorable Joe (Stalin now known as Biden) - proudly proclaims blacks ho are not black by his sage determination. Execute all the uncle toms is his equity driven clarion call.
The Supreme Court made their ruling, now let's see them enforce it.
Who are the entities issuing the loans? If it is the federal government itself, then there is nothing wrong at all with the federal government issuing a debt jubilee to itself. Is the federal government going to default on some subset of bonds that are artificially allocated to some 'student loan' account when that subset of student loans isn't paid back?
There are all sorts of reasons why student loans should not be made for college and certainly not by government and not for private colleges. And they should, like all debt, be dischargeable in bankruptcy court.
But the venality of sanctifying debt peonage over all other values before someone's career even begins is simply evil. David Graeber and Michael Hudson and the Bible for that matter are completely correct about debt jubilee.
Exactly. They're just upset that some immigrants and/or brown people may benefit from this.
I'd guess Jfree is more concerned about Jews benefiting from this.
Bye bye
Again. Not a parody of Jeff. A clone of Jeff.
Are you sure it’s not just Jeffy? Because he’s thrown this bullshit accusation at me before.
Yeah. Muted jeff for the day earlier.
I thought I had Jeff muted for a while. Is this some carefully constructed alias where he's changed a letter or added a space to the new name?
Reason coders seemed to break the no clones again. What happens when you tell journalists to learn to code.
Chemjeff says government circumventing the constitution to forgive billions of dollars in loans (for mostly political purposes) is a good thing if it helps brown people.
My cost benefit analysis says this will not only increase the deficit but also encourage all kinds of risky behavior in the future. I know chem is big on that, but when brown people enter the room, the equation changes.
What reward awaits Asian immigrants who makes too much money to qualify for IDR and faithfully made monthly payments? "Fuck YOU, yellow man, your success renders you all but white"?
Fuck you. And STFU until you actually pay taxes.
If it is the federal government itself, then there is nothing wrong at all with the federal government issuing a debt jubilee to itself.
Where does the government get the money it handed out statist?
From the future wages of those students (and younger generations).
Now explain how there is nothing wrong with that.
I'm already saying that there should be no federal student loans in future. There is no such thing in reality as 'allocated' bonds. Forgiving those loans does not increase debt. Further, immiserating students into what is effectively a punitively high tax rate is about as sleazy and evil as you can get considering oldsters incur that amount of debt 2x over EVERY FUCKING DAY and are passing the debt load on to those immiserated students.
You didnt explain why thsy is a good thing now. These people willingly incurred a debt. So explain why it is fine this time.
There is no such thing as 'willingly incurred ' when so many employers require college degrees for jobs that clearly don't require college education. And that is also manifested by pay differentials - $712/week average for HS degrees;$770/week for 'some college but no degree'; and $1173/week for bachelor's degree.
18 year olds don't cause this. Employers do. Nor do 18 year olds have any ability to earn that differential within a particular employer because employers no longer pay for degrees/courses. They are simply using someone else's debt as a screening mechanism.
This is debt peonage
"There is no such thing as ‘willingly incurred ‘ when so many employers require college degrees for jobs that clearly don’t require college education..."
Dim-bulb assertions from lefty shits =/= argument or evidence.
It's a moral argument. Interacting like a normal person is hard for you, isn't
it?
It's not a moral argument. It is a financial argument. The only reason people want to make it a moral argument is because they want to beat people over the head for no reason at all (which is exactly why commenters herealmost always argue the way they do) and they don't actually understand the finances.
Student loans are a ludicrous notion. Everyone knows that if those loans didn't exist, then:
1. Prices for tuition/etc would drop. Even more so for courses that don't offer much financial benefit to the student. iow - pricing system will begin to work.
2. Employers will once again start paying for coursework that benefits them and for a workforce that meets the skills they need.
3. Young people with no work experience will not be required to predict the lifetime future value of a particular credential that they will have to go deep into the hole for up front. College will not be like buying a fucking house credential. It will be a course-by-course purchase.
4. Colleges will get out of the 18-22 'lifestyle' business. Their function will be to teach subject matter. Students will have a much wider range of ages, experiences, course loads, completion times, etc.
The way to get rid of the bullshit status quo is to get rid of it all. The ONLY rationale for forcing people to keep paying student loans is to force college prices to remain high. That's a bullshit rationale.
Those who oppose this in favor of the current status quo are quite simply - assholes. THAT is the morality here.
"There is no such thing as ‘willingly incurred ‘ when so many employers require college degrees for jobs that clearly don’t require college education. And that is also manifested by pay differentials – $712/week average for HS degrees;$770/week for ‘some college but no degree’; and $1173/week for bachelor’s degree."
It's fair to make those people who make less money being told to make up for loans that people richer than they are took out. Really.
And the only thing you are really advocating is keeping college prices high.
Shifting the debt to people not yet born…
Seems the left needs to stop fighting for a woman’s right to kill her kids because they will need those kids to become loyal taxpayers to meet the massive amou t of tax money that will be needed to pay for this shit.
Between abortion and nihilistic fear of parenthood, Democrats no longer reproduce by procreation. That's why the education indoctrination pipeline is so essential.
The entity authorizing the loans was Congress. Congress could legally declare a debt jubilee. Under our system of divided government, that authority is not supposed to reside in the Executive branch.
Even if the loans originated from the executive branch, canceling the loans is just spending. The power of the purse belongs to Congress. The executive branch has no authority to just give out money.
But hey, who's gonna stop him?
I tend to agree. Unless those student loans are already in de facto default. In that case, the collection or management or write down is an executive function.
What Congress SHOULD be doing is moving reform legislation through Congress. Instead, it just has a dog and pony show initiating something and then sends it to die in committee. Congress is a complete failure as a branch of government. And it can't be overhauled from the inside either.
"What Congress SHOULD be doing is moving reform legislation through Congress."
Agreed. Make student loans excusable thru bankruptcy.
Have schools be responsible for half of all loans discharged via bankruptcy.
Remove loans from the government and make banks issue them with zero government underwriting of them.
Have schools be responsible for half of all loans discharged via bankruptcy.
Jeezus Fucking Christ. Discharged through bankruptcy means discharged. Written off. Not some fucking game of whack-a-mole where creditors want someone else to pay the loan. WRITE IT OFF.
Remove loans from the government and make banks issue them with zero government underwriting of them.
Yes and no. The reality is that when governments get out of the business of student loans and those debts can be discharged in bankruptcy - the entire business model of bank-based 'student loans' will disappear. That is GOOD. Stop thinking it should remain propped up.
Student loans didn't even EXIST until roughly the early 70's with SallieMae. GI Bill and other federal stuff before then were grants and scholarships and such. Total federal student loans outstanding didn't hit $1 billion until 1979. It was roughly $5 billion by 1985 (when the bankruptcy rules were changed). There were some college loans (from endowments) and some bank loans then but they were all basically personal/character/pretty-please loans. $185 billion by 1995. Now it is $1.7 trillion.
Loans simply were not a significant way of financing college then. But people still went to college then. 12 million students in 1980 v 19 million now. Loans did NOT expand the college pool. It expanded the teat-sucking pool and turned it all into a business. That was a complete screw-up and a mistake. Get rid of it and take the shackles off the young.
Anyone advocating 'force students to pay those loans because harrumph harrumph harrumph' - who completed college by the early/mid 80's - is just an asshole who's full of shit. Ok Boomer.
Nailed it! Plus destroying private businesses, killing Jews and Catholics and- as honorable Joe (Stalin now known as Biden) - proudly proclaims blacks are not black by his sage determination unless they vote for his kangaroo court. Execute all the uncle toms is his equity driven clarion call.
The money went out but it's not coming back in as repayment. That is what's wrong with it. The federal government is not issuing a debt jubilee to itself. It is not a separate entity. It is our, the taxpayers, money that is gone. That is what is wrong with it. I and many others didn't agree to this. Who are you to take our property to do with as you want?
"From Day One of his Administration, President Biden vowed to fix the student loan system and make sure higher education is a pathway to the middle class—not a barrier to opportunity."
Right. Forgiving student loans is fixing the system. Now fix the tax code by abolishing the federal income tax.
$5 says they're already working on SAVE++, which lowers the terms to 1% over 400% of the poverty line and forgives any balance over $20,000 after five years of repayments.
And I bet someone has a napkin outlining the ultimate program, WOOHOO, which requires you make a single $1 payment before you actually die, after which any loan balance under $1 billion (adjusted for inflation) is forgiven.
It's interesting how the The Biden Administration morphed into The Biden-Harris Administration.
I've noticed that in print a lot more lately. Especially with the garbage that leftist kids really like.
The Supreme Court blocked me, but they can't stop me. ~~B
Can anyone imagine what the reaction would have been, if Trump had made that statement, along with ignoring what the court ruled?
>>"The Biden-Harris Administration has now approved ...
did they game out the negatives on this?
Well, ol' sleepy Joe has F15s, and the (no longer) supreme court doesn't, so - - - - - - -
"The Biden-Harris Administration..."
Is that normal? Have they always hyphenated that shit?
Vice President's job has been described as a bucket of spit.
Hers in particular.
Willie Brown says Harris is not a spitter. She's a swallower.
You seem rather excited about Biden jettisoning the rule of law, but then you're a Leftist so maintaining society or actually solving problems aren't really in your skillset of feelings.
As we see with 2A decisions at state supreme courts in Hawaii, California, New York and Pennsylvania, SCOTUS no longer is the highest court in the land and its decisions are being increasingly ignored by Democrat judges at lower levels.
Let's see. Desperate Democrats. Election year. If you are surprised, you are an idiot.
But one has to wonder, will all of the deadbeats, really say "I have to vote for the senile old fool, just because he gave me this ill-gotten gain"?
Or will they just say, "You idiot, I still think you're more of an evil, that the other guy. I'm just wealthier, now."?
As things stand, the Supreme Court really has no teeth. For it to have teeth, it should be like this: If a case comes before the Supreme Court that is substantially equivalent to a case that has already come before the Supreme Court, and the court rules the same again, then all those involved in violating the previous Supreme Court ruling need to go to jail, period.
Did you think the leader (Hitler) of the [Na]tional So[zi]alist party would continue to adhere to USA Supreme Law or any Court attempting to enforce that law???????
The insurrection isn't people protesting election fraud. The insurrection is in the D.C. system already and Biden is the insurrection groups leader.
Fed student loans shouldn’t have interest. Private loans sure. But the feds just sell the loans to private companies anyway to collect and those companies collect all the interest, charge all kinds of fees and penalties and have an incentive for repayment to take as long as possible so they collect more in fees, penalties and interest. Its corporate welfare. And as this site reminds me all the time, welfare is BAD. And if its bad for inner city minority kids to eat or have clothes in winter then its bad for Sallie Mae or the Missouri Higher Education Authority as well. Corporate welfare queens.
“Fed student loans shouldn’t have interest…”
Lefty assertions =/= argument or evidence.
No comment on corporate welfare?
What did these people do to deserve to have their loan forgiven?
Grew blue balls. Little dinky snail like ones like ‘lil Joey. Dr Biden loves playing his pocket pool.
Show me the man and I will show you the law.