Biden Pours Out Another $6.5 Billion for the CHIPS Act's Costly Protectionism
It's part of the government's expensive public-private partnership meant to address concerns over a reliance on foreign countries, like China, for semiconductors.

The White House this month announced plans for how it will direct billions of dollars in funding toward semiconductors, marking a new phase in the implementation of the CHIPS and Science Act.
The $280 billion legislation, signed into law in 2022, aims to bolster semiconductor production in the U.S. President Joe Biden's administration said Monday that it will funnel $1.5 billion to GlobalFoundries, a semiconductor manufacturing and design company, to increase its domestic output. Perhaps more significant, however, was Biden's dispatch earlier this month announcing the administration will use at least $5 billion to establish a National Semiconductor Technology Center (NSTC), which will, among other things, support "the design, prototyping, and piloting of the latest semiconductor technologies," according to the White House.
This latest effort is part of the government's expensive and protectionist public-private partnership meant to address concerns over a reliance on foreign countries, like China, for chips.
"Semiconductors were invented in America and serve as the backbone of the modern economy," the White House said in a statement. "But today, the United States produces less than 10 percent of global supply and none of the most advanced chips."
The NSTC will supposedly also play a crucial role in expanding the semiconductor workforce to manufacture computing chips that can complement advances in artificial intelligence and related industries. Semiconductors are projected to become a $1 trillion industry by 2030, according to McKinsey & Company.
The CHIPS and Science Act has several eyebrow-raising elements, including $81 billion for the National Science Foundation—doubling the agency's budget over five years. Another $24 billion will go toward tax credits meant to subsidize and incentivize private companies to invest in semiconductors.
While the legislation was likely well-intentioned, it was doomed to have protectionist ramifications. "To defeat China, the argument goes, the U.S. must adopt the tactics of the Chinese Communist Party, at least when it comes to high-end manufacturing," Reason's Eric Boehm wrote in January 2023. But that ham-handed approach to industrial policy and corporate welfare drives up the deficit and hampers economic growth at very little benefit to the taxpayer, who are forced to fund these initiatives.
It's likely unsurprising that many large corporations lobbied for the CHIPS and Science Act, including Meta, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, Northrop Grumman, Carrier, Trane, and General Dynamics, as well as labor unions like the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations and the Communications Workers of America. "Big government means big lobbying," wrote David Boaz, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. "When you lay out a picnic, you get ants. And today's federal budget is the biggest picnic in history."
The CHIPS and Science Act passed with bipartisan support. But its detractors were also made up of strange bedfellows. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) and then-Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.) both referred to the law as "corporate welfare" and a "blank check." Sanders went as far as to call it a "bribe."
"When the government adopts an industrial policy that socializes all the risk and privatizes all the profits, that is crony capitalism," Sanders said.
He's not wrong. The law "is another episode of politicians granting favors to their friends in the semiconductor industry," Veronique de Rugy, a contributing editor at Reason and a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center, wrote last year. Such an approach "punishes those who aren't elite or can't organize to extract favors from politicians."
Michelle Nuzzo-Kelly is an apt example. She was among the residents of Burnet Road near Syracuse, New York, who received several offers to purchase her home. But those offers didn't come from private buyers: They came from the government, as Onondaga County sought to expand a plot of land so it could attract a developer. Micron, one of the world's largest semiconductor manufacturing firms, is now set to build a facility there, thanks to lucrative taxpayer-funded subsidies from the state and federal government.
"The offers to buy Nuzzo-Kelly's home were never really just offers," Boehm wrote when covering the case in November 2022. "They were demands backed by a threat to use government power to force her to sell."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Once again, the government is going to the rescue of Silicon Valley, the most misnamed place on earth. There hasn't been a silicon foundry in California for over 20 years. Billing itself as the center of innovation, they haven't innovated anything since the iPhone.
This is a reward for backing the Democrats. It will kill off any company, large or small, that might be developing a better semiconductor. All the engineering talent will be sucked up by the major companies to produce chips using the same technology.
If there is anything that can kill Nvidia and AMD, it's "help" from the Feds.
It's social media valley now, dominated by the likes of Facebook and Google and Microsoft and Apple. There are hardly any semiconductor jobs, but lots of coding jobs. Which are soon to be replaced by AI, as it turns into AI Valley.
I've noticed that nVidia stock has shot up. Coincidence? I think not.
Pelosi must have some money riding on nVidia.
Sematech is already a government failure. It was supposed to be an industry consortium to develop advanced semiconductor processes including Extreme Ultra-Violet lithography. A Dutch firm beat them to it and produces the only EUV lithography machines. Taiwan Semiconductor uses the Dutch machines in their foundries.
Principled Trump supporters who defended his protectionist policies and rhetoric praise Biden for subsidizing Americans who are competing with China!
Who am I kidding.
I wish I knew someone as generous as me.
Adam Smith on Tariffs
*Generally Advantageous Cases for Tariffs*
Case 1 pg 355
There seems, however, to be two cases in which it will be generally advantageous to lay some burden on foreign for the benefit of domestic industry.
The first is, when some particular sort of industry is necessary for the defence of the country.
Case 2 pg 366
The second case, in which it will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign for the encouragement of domestic industry is, when some tax is imposed at home upon the produce of the latter. In this case, it does seem reasonable that an equal tax should be imposed upon the like produce of the former.
http://ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf
Fortunately, improvements in economic thinking have occurred since the 18th century.
Really? Explain to me why it is economically beneficial to impose taxes/regulations on economic activity at home and then engage in tariff free trade with nations that do not impose such taxes/regulations.
Next, you might want to explain how it is compatible with libertarianism to engage in trade with others who grossly violate the NAP.
I’m eagerly awaiting your explanations!
I think you’re going to have a long wait.
MORE [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] will fix the consequences of [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism]! /s
According to the authoritarian propagandists, "protectionism" is good for the US Empire, bad when it is used against the Empire.
Does restricting trade help the US economy? No! It hurts all countries, all the time. But, so does the worldwide political paradigm, authoritarianism/collectivism. That is "the root of the problem of international chaos", e.g., the cause of war.
Fix it by switching to a new politics of reason, rights, personal choice.
Yeah, we'd all be better off if managed trade was replaced by free trade.
Yeah, we’d all be better off if managed trade was replaced by free trade.
Free trade with who exactly? Free trade requires free markets.
It is logically impossible to have free trade with Europe, China, Southeast Asia, or most other countries. Worse yet, if you trade with countries like China, you are participating in violations of the NAP.
Enriching China means bolstering a hostile state that has made themselves our number one global enemy. If anything, we should be uncoupling ourselves from their markets. Doing business with them makes less sense than Dr, Evil feeding Austin Powers dinner before lowering him into a pool of ill tempered mutated sea bass.
Biden Pours Out Another $6.5 Billion for the CHIPS Act's Costly Protectionism
TSMC has no competitors in the US. Who exactly does this alleged "protectionism" protect?
In fact, high tariffs on specific, strategic goods that currently are not made in the US isn't "protectionism".
Furthermore, subsidies to government-favored companies isn't "protectionism" either.
Get your terminology straight. Then actually make rational arguments for your preferred policies, because right now, you're just spewing nonsense.
We do know this about Biden : He knows shit all about science.
A whole speech on the OMNIcron virus. And the VP gave a remarkably stupid interview about AI. Biden was bottom 10 even in his law class !! At Syracuse. A stupid and lazy man.
CHPS will ensure that the first place technology companies go in the future is to the legislature.