Alexei Navalny's Death Is a Timely Reminder of How Much Russia Sucks
And, sadly, of how relatively powerless the United States is to fix the mess that Russian President Vladimir Putin has made.

If there is the thinnest bit of a silver lining to be found in the untimely demise of Alexei Navalny, the Russian opposition leader who reportedly died this week in prison, perhaps it is this: It is a well-timed reminder of how much Russia sucks.
Most Americans probably don't need the reminder. After all, Russia has been an authoritarian state for as long as any American alive today can remember, and Russian President Vladimir Putin's record of murdering political opponents, imprisoning critics, and silencing dissent is well established. Also, there's that foolish, destructive war in Ukraine.
This week, however, the internet has been treated to the absurd spectacle of former Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson's bizarre propaganda tour of Moscow (on the heels of his more defensible decision to interview Putin). Via videos posted to X, formerly Twitter, Carlson raved about the beauty of the Moscow subway system and was wowed by the stunning technology of…shopping carts? Through it all, Carlson has repeatedly suggested that maybe Russia isn't such bad a place, as if a lack of subway graffiti were the most important metric for measuring the quality of a country.
Navalny's death, at the age of 47, says far more about Russia than any of Carlson's puff pieces ever could.
And his death is only the latest development in a damning saga that should indict both Putin and the kleptocratic state that he's built since taking over as Russia's leader-for-life over 20 years. Since bursting onto the scene by leading protests in the wake of a corrupt election in 2011, Navalny had been repeatedly arrested, convicted, and released from prison. In 2020, he nearly died after being poisoned and falling into a coma. In 2021, he was arrested for the last time and ultimately sentenced to over 30 years in prison after what Amnesty International called a "sham" trial.
"Make no mistake: Putin is responsible for Navalny's death," President Joe Biden said Friday. "We don't know exactly what happened, but there's no doubt that the death of Navalny was the consequence of something Putin and his thugs did."
Oftentimes, the news of the day requires context and analysis. There's deeper meaning to be drawn out of events and few clearly obvious conclusions. Sometimes, though, it's pretty straightforward: Russia sucks, and Putin's totalitarian impulses are big part of the reason why. You do not, under any circumstances, gotta hand it to him.
Even so, any silver lining here is exceedingly thin, because it doesn't take long for a deeper reality to become apparent: That the United States, for all its military and economic might, can't do much to fix the mess that Putin has made in Russia.
Just moments after condemning Putin for Navalny's death, for example, Biden was asked by a reporter at the White House how the United States would respond. For context, keep in mind that Biden previously promised "devastating" consequences for Russia if Navalny died in prison.
On Friday, Biden seemed to back away from that idea, incidentally illustrating how powerless America is to influence what happens next inside Russia. "We're contemplating what else can be done," he said. "We're looking at a whole number of options."
As Noah Rothman points out at National Review, there isn't much Biden can do: "As recently as December, the administration tightened the sanctions regime around Moscow by applying additional leverage on third parties 'supplying goods or processing transactions that materially support Russia's military-industrial base.' Perhaps the administration could augment efforts to police restrictions on foreign financial transactions involving Russian funds and impose additional costs on institutions that try to circumvent U.S. sanctions," he writes. Alternatively, "the president could employ additional measures along with its allies to imperil Russia's Black Sea fleet and, in concert with Turkey, menace Russian forces in Syria. But those are riskier propositions."
It probably makes more sense to focus on helping the Russian civilians who want to or already have managed to escape Putin's grasp. There's not much America can do to influence Russian domestic affairs, but welcoming those who desire freedom—rather than subjecting them to detention or long waits in the purgatory of the American immigration system—should be a no-brainer.
As an added benefit, nothing disproves nonsensical narratives like the ones Carlson is peddling like the fact that people are fleeing Russia by droves while there are long lines of people waiting to enter the United States.
Still, Navalny's death stings because it seems like a serious blow to the frail hope that Russia will ever take even the smallest of steps toward freedom and democracy. Change has to come from within, but he represented the best (if obviously imperfect) chance for that to happen—and now he's dead, killed by the political system he stood against.
That sucks. And it sucks that there's not much we can do about it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As an added benefit, nothing disproves nonsensical narratives like the ones Carlson is peddling like the fact that people are fleeing Russia by droves while there are long lines of people waiting to enter the United States.
What are you talking about? He's the most honest man in America!
sarcasmic...What are the nonsensical narratives from Carlson?
How much did Fox pay Dominion?
I thought you didn't support lawfare.
Settlement came 24 hours after NY judge rules on the "facts" disallowing any avenue of defense. Their revenues a year were on the low millions, so how were they harmed by over 700M.
You want evidence you support lawfare. Here it is. Lol.
At least he died quickly.
In the US Biden’s team has been trying to kill Trump, death by 1000 cuts, for 8 years.
Soooo…The Aryan Pure Superman wants to outlaw art and music, surprise parties, proprietary Intellectual Property and coorporate trade secrets, and plain ol’ swapping lies in a fishing boat, none of which have victims, yet he defends Trump who’s now been found guilty of civil fraud, an act which does have victims.
Trump civil fraud case: Judge fines Trump $354 million, says frauds ‘shock the conscience’ The former president was found to have defrauded lenders.
ByPeter Charalambous and Aaron Katersky
Last Updated: February 16, 2024, 5:51 PM
https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/trump-fraud-trial/interest-will-add-about-100m-to-trumps-fine-107308533?id=103642561
I guess Integrity and The Law of Non-Contradiction mean nothing to Aryan Pure Superman “logic” and “morality.”
Fuck Off, Nazi!
“…yet he defends Trump who’s now been found guilty of civil fraud, an act which does have victims.” “Trump civil fraud case: Judge fines Trump $354 million, says frauds ‘shock the conscience’ The former president was found to have defrauded lenders”
Show me one actual victim. If Trump defrauded any lender, why has no lender brought suit? Show me one lender who has lost any money whatsoever. Show me where Trump is in default or behind in payments on any loan. Show me where Trump got any favorable terms he would not ordinarily have gotten, given his vast holdings.
It's still fucking around with numbers when taxpayers foot the bill for any insolvency that could result! Not with my taxdollars, Trumpy Bear and Brucie!
How are the taxpayers footing the bill? The lenders would be footing the bill, and they’re not complaining. If the lenders were concerned about Trump’s net worth, they’d send their own auditors or require more detailed documentation. Libertarians cannot assume that the lenders would be bailed out by the taxpayers in blamng Trump.
“Brucie” I don’t need to insult you to make my point. Why not just reread what I’ve written above, and be reasonable and honest, and be prepared to concede the point if reasonable? No insults required.
I lived through the Savings and Loan bailouts of the late Eighties and the bank bailouts of 2008-2009, so a taxpayer bailout of lenders who became insolvent because of massaged numbers by Trump is both possible and probable. See my response to Nelson below as well. Lending is a business, and business eats nothing, especially when they can turn to taxpayers to cover their mistakes.
Pardon me if I got unduly insulting, but I'm more than a little sick of this Cult of Personality bullshit surrounding Trump.
I normally consciously avoid the mile-long threads of copypasta on Trump in the Comments, but when the prospect of having to pay for Trump's shit comes to mind--and when Herr Misek, the Holocaust-Deniing Nazi who wants to outlaw lying comes to the defense of Trump whom Here Misek concedes is a liar--all of that pisses me off and sets me off like a house afire!
*Whew!*. I think I'm calm now. Again, apologies for being unduly insulting to a Commenter I rarely even see, but you should be mad as Hell too. The taxdollars you lose one day may be your own.
"I lived through the Savings and Loan bailouts of the late Eighties and the bank bailouts of 2008-2009, so a taxpayer bailout of lenders who became insolvent because of massaged numbers by Trump is both possible and probable. See my response to Nelson below as well. Lending is a business, and business eats nothing, especially when they can turn to taxpayers to cover their mistakes."
Except it is not the case here as the banks were paid back in full.
" I lived through the Savings and Loan bailouts of the late Eighties and the bank bailouts of 2008-2009, so a taxpayer bailout of lenders who became insolvent because of massaged numbers by Trump is both possible and probable"
Those banking crises were not because of fraud on the part of borrowers, rather by actions of lenders knowingly making sub-prime or shakey loans, and the Fed. Almost anything is possible. Where's the evidence that it's probable? You could answer that by saying that accounts are already insured by the FDIC, which has its own standards. But, the FDIC wasn't concerned enough to investigate Trump.
In a libertarian society, we don't take sanctions against individuals because the government, contrary to libertarianism, might bail out those affected. The solution is to oppose bailouts, not prosecute borrowers in absence of any complaint or reasonable suspicion, based upon subjective disagreements about valuations. It's ultimately the responsibility of lenders (and depositors) to do due diligence.
” Pardon me if I got unduly insulting, but I’m more than a little sick of this Cult of Personality bullshit surrounding Trump.”
I don’t give a rat’s ass about Trump, personally. I know that sounds cold. I just think that initiating investigations based upon political reasons, or simply because someone’s an asshole, is bad for freedom. It’s not necessarily illegal to be an asshole. Just because Trump is an asshole, doesn’t necessarily give reasonable suspicion that he’s committed a crime, thereby justifying an investigation. I believe that there should be reasonable suspicion before any government investigation could be undertaken upon anyone, not initiating an investigation first, without reasonable suspicion, in the hopes of finding it.
The danger to freedom of allowing investigations on predominantly political grounds in the absence of reasonable suspicion is far greater than anything alleged against asshole Trump so far.
Maybe Kol Nidre boy here is advocating the criminalization of lying now.
Hahaha
No, I advocate the criminalization of taking values by lying, not surprise parties, proprietary business data, art and song, liar's contests, and swapping lies in a fishing boat!
You know, taking values by lying, such as when your buddies piled up closhes, glasses, wallets, purses, bills, coins, and later Gold teeth while telling their victims they were going to take a delousing shower!
Fuck Off, Nazi!
"Show me one actual victim."
Anyone whom owns stick in one of the banks he defrauded or an index fund that holds those stocks. So millions of people, possibly including you.
Yes, lying sucks.
Yours is an ironic argument. You advocate the market and object to lying.
How would the free market function if lying was criminalized?
Prove in every case every day that nobody in the entire supply chain or market lied to make stock values change.
I say Great! Criminalize lying.
"...Yes, lying sucks..."
You have much experience in the matter.
Exactly, not to mention taxpayers bailing out banks becoming insolvent because of making loans based on guesstimated numbers.
So....criminally charge anybody who ever provided an estimate of value that did not match the banks, which is 100% of all loans?
Good plan.
"Anyone whom owns stick in one of the banks he defrauded or an index fund that holds those stocks. So millions of people, possibly including you."
Show me one bank Trump defrauded where he got favorable interest rates or failed to pay back. Show me where anything Trump has done has affected the price of any stock, aside from his official actions as predident affecting the general stock market. You assume a lot without proof.
What is it Kol Nidre boys, lie or don’t lie?
Criminalizing lying will prevent all forms of corruption and the resulting silence from you fuckwits is merely an added bonus.
Until then I’ll keep rubbing your faces in the fact that you’re lying until one of you fuckwits actually proves that I’ve lied by refuting something that I’ve said.
Just one description and one link will do. Just one.
Now fuck off you lying wastes of skin.
"Settlement came 24 hours after NY judge rules on the “facts” disallowing any avenue of defense. "
Phony baloney elections.
Phony baloney jury trials.
It's not a jury trial if the jury is not allowed to see the evidence.
You are talking about 2020 stuff. Ok, I was trying to ascertain if you meant something more recent, like his interview with Vlad 'The Impaler' Putin.
To be fair, Putin prefers to have his victims thrown out of windows, not impaled.
Is there a girl-bullying politician Pucker Tarleyton WON'T huff, puff and... um... you-know-whut?
Sarc has been given Tuckers comments regarding Sydney Powell over a dozen times. He called her out. Sarc doesn’t care. He hates fox. He supports lawfare.
He is the Beast to Trump's Antichrist.
Compared to the TDS-addled asshole brandyshit.
Fleeing Russia? You must mean the USSR, very different now.The world is now fleeing the dollar. Pay attention!
If only Russia wasn't so rich from the US dropping out of the oil business, maybe they would have something else on their mind.
If the sanctions were still in place, maybe they would have something else on their mind.
I wonder how those things happened? I'm pretty sure it wasn't from legislation passed in both houses.
the US dropping out of the oil business
You're aware that the US is the world's largest oil producer, right?
Sorry to bust your narrative with stupid facts.
'Longtobefree' has facts on mute.
He/it soaks up the MAGA Cult's "alternative facts". The usual cadre of Trump Cultists (Jesse, ML, Insane Troll, etc) enable him/it.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
And you’re aware that given the size of the Russian economy, when compared to the US, they produce an enormous amount of not just oil, but natural gas (#2 in the world) and other resources as well, much of which is as-of-yet untapped.
edit: And further, they don't have an entire political party trying to shut that production down.
Shrike still denies this happens.
https://reason.com/2024/01/31/bidens-natural-gas-export-ban-is-based-on-bad-math/
Ukraine sucks too. They killed an American/chilean journalist.
Won't someone please rid us of this turbulent whataboutism?
You've really gone full idiot recently.
Go searxh how many stories they have on lira. Zero. Sure they mentioned Renaud. But you and others who defend the big state narrative try to pretend there are no biases here. It is laughable and shows your own willful ignorance on many subjects.
Outrage for a topic but only against certain actors is a bias. Some of you idiots are too partisan to understand that fact. If you were principled both would matter, but they don't.
Youre no different than Biden discussing selective gun violence. Only going on Twitter when it pushes his own preferred narratives.
Youre part of the idiocy of politics. No principles at all.
Lira was in prison because he had been arrested, released on bail and then tried to skip his trial. Regardless of whether the original charges were justified, fleeing the country to avoid a trial is a separate crime. Ask Julian Assange how that works.
Lol. Why did he die in prison, though? You’ll note he wasn’t killed trying to flee.
Or is the only tragedy of Navalny’s death that he *complied* with the despotic regime before he was subsequently disposed of?
Who? Lira died of pneumonia, apparently. You can read online a handwritten note apparently written by him which describes what he was suffering from. He was obviously seriously ill. I have no idea how he became ill, and neither do you, but he certainly didn't die of "torture", unless he forgot to mention that fact in his note. He may have died because of neglect, however, which is reprehensible, but hardly a unique feature of Ukrainian prisons.
He died of pneumonia a few days after filming a video that they were going to kill him if they captured him. Are you this credulous with the Putin regimes explanations?
Even if he did, it was the fact he wasn’t being treated that got him there.
What the fuck are you talking about? He died six months after posting his last video on YouTube, in which he said he was about to reach the Hungarian border. He contracted double pneumonia in prison, and it took months for him to be diagnosed properly and eventually treated for it. That delay is what killed him.
If you want to say prison killed him, that seem fairly accurate. But he was in prison because he was an idiot.
I can't recall ever having defended a big state narrative or pretending that there are no biases here. Even so, this article was about Putin assassinating a political rival, not about whatever failings the Ukraine might have. Whining about how "it's just not fair!" in this situation is "whataboutism" and it just makes you look impotent.
Still, Navalny's death stings because it seems like a serious blow to the frail hope that Russia will ever take even the smallest of steps toward freedom and democracy.
Counter proposal: not everyone wants democracy and freedom.
No one really cares what happens to Russians in Russia. The Europeans, for example, would dearly love to have a plausible excuse to let the cheap Russian natural gas flow again, but - Ukraine. Reminds me of the (paraphrased) Shakespearean "Oh, my natural gas! Oh, my national security!" quandry.
Let those who don’t want freedom do their own dying in self-imposed prison away from me and without dragging with them others like Alexei Navalny.
That's more than 80% of the global population.
Do you plan on shutting them off?
Have you asked them? In an unguarded moment? The percentage of people who want freedom might be greater.
Either way, it is why I prefer loft living. Attacking someone from below to above is a might bit harder, especially when the would-be attackers don’t like labor and the target of attack has a clear line of sight.
🙂
😉
Russia worse than Tucker Carson portrays: American conservatives hardest hit.
Now do Gonzalo Lira.
Be careful. MWA prefers everyone to be intentionally ignorant here and just touch preferred political narratives.
Navalny voluntarily returned to Russia for his trial; Lira attempted to flee Ukraine to avoid his trial.
Now do reading comprehension.
Be careful! Jesse prefers personal attacks and misdirection to actual discussion!
What in the actual fuck is your point there?
That an American journalist in a “free country” that we heavily subsidize should expect to die in custody when criticizing the regime? Because funny enough, he did expect to die. That’s why he was trying to flee.
What is your point? You brought up Lira, whose tragic case is not comparable to Navalny's.
He "expected to die", justifying [whatever]. Sure, that's why the Ukrainians let him out on bail. Criminal regimes who intend to murder people always let them out on bail before murdering them. It'a practically SOP.
The only difference you’ve presented is that he was let out on bail. So he could wait around to be railroaded back into the sane facility that ignored him while he was dying.
Even in the American context, prisons letting people die in captivity is frowned upon.
Lira's theory, if you'd bothered to watch any of his tedious videos, was that the SBU expected him to leave Ukraine--that's why they let him out, didn't tag him and gave him his documents back. I think he may have been right.
But, rather than take the hint, he decided to "poke the bear", and ended up back in jail. In a country at war. Which probably didn't have exemplary prison healthcare even before the war...
Well, yeah, Nalvany probably thought his CIA and MI6 handlers would bail him out. A random blogger like Coach Redpill doesn't have those connections.
That's absurd.
No, Russia blowing up their own pipeline is absurd. Come to think of it, so is Putin killing a guy who no longer posed any direct threat to him JUST after the eyes of the west turned to him. But whatevs. Maybe it’s just a strange bit of fate. Considering there’s no reason we shouldn’t take the word of prison doctors as you said above.
What's absurd, that some rando wouldn't have assumed top cover versus someone with favored public status?
Ask Brittney Griner and Paul Whelan how that works.
You're right--I must have missed Navalny's American citizenship. Of course, the US would have stopped at nothing to get him "back".
After all, Russia has been an authoritarian state for as long as any American alive today can remember [...] Carlson raved about the beauty of the Moscow subway system and was wowed by the stunning technology of…shopping carts?
Let's deconstruct this for just a few minutes.
My daughter lived in Japan for a year. I went to visit her in early 2023. During my time there, I raved about the cleanliness, efficiency and safety of the subway system. I marveled at the lack of crime, drug use, homelessness... I was impressed by all the examples of not just high-trust aspects of their society, but the extreme high trust aspects of their society.
But I also know some things about Japan that are less well known and talked about: Japan's criminal justice system engages in what is sometimes called 'hostage justice'. If you're arrested for even a small petty crime, if you fight the charges, you will be held until your trial, and when you do finally go to trial, there will be around a 99.9% chance you'll get convicted, so it's often advised you admit to the crime and attempt to negotiate some kind of restitution. If you're a foreigner accused of one of these petty crimes, you'll likely be kicked out of the country.
Japan is EXTREMELY intolerant of drugs. Punishments are harsh, and many over the counter medications available here in the United States are the Japanese equivalent of Schedule I drugs.
Japan has rather strict socially enforced systems of conformity. People familiar with the Japanese school systems will point out that said schools spend more time and effort pushing these systems of conformity than they do in the service of knowledge production.
Japan does NOT believe in open borders. They don't even believe in slightly porous borders. Japanese public life has what in any reasonable context here in America would be dismissed as 'racism'. Japan has "Japanese-only" restaurants where you will be shown the door in short order if you walk in.
So anyhoo, there I am, raving about the 'train system'. Does that make Japan an "authoritarian hell hole" run by... whoever the PM of Japan is? Hardly. The answer is: It's complicated.
So what about modern day Russia. Unlike Mr Boehm, I actually have a memory of life not just before Twitter, but life before the internet, and I have very good memories of the Soviet Union.
Modern day Russia is nothing like the old Soviet Union. Boehm is, as so many western journalists do these days, writing off an entire civilization because it doesn't fully share his current-day hip swiveling libertarian ideals of how a society should be run.
There are many ways of looking at societies like Russia or Japan, or South Korea, or Mexico or Great Britain or France. But for those of us old enough to remember just how dehumanizing it was to live in the old Soviet Union-- or East Germany (Yo, Boehm, there used to be a border wall-- to keep people IN!!!), modern day Russia in no way resembles that old authoritarian hell hole.
But putting all of this aside for a moment, this is where it might be a nice time to make an aside: Yours (and my!) libertarian sensibilities are a unique aspect of the American cultural milieu, and when you start to learn something about how the rest of the world operates, including countries like Russia and Japan, you realize pretty quickly that if there was no America, there would be no milieu for libertarianism (whatever brand you stan) to percolate in.
Appreciate you, and your insights into Japan and their culture.
Except for the invasion of the entire eastern half of the world by the Empire of Japan (which, of course, is nothing like the modern day Japan) and the invasion of Ukraine (by, of course, a despotic, paranoid Russian culture that is nothing like the despotic, paranoid Russian culture that gave birth to Communism - of course of course of course of course ...) No one now alive gives a flying fark about what happens to Russia in Russia, but invading a peaceable neighbor kind of crosses the line, don't you think?
Neocon talking points lol.
"...No one now alive gives a flying fark about what happens to Russia in Russia, but invading a peaceable neighbor kind of crosses the line, don’t you think?"
IMO, it certainly does, and those threatened (the Euro nations) should recognize the threat, quit claiming sainthood (and paying for) socialized everything, and pay for their own defense.
100%
"...People familiar with the Japanese school systems will point out that said schools spend more time and effort pushing these systems of conformity than they do in the service of knowledge production..."
Sort of OT, but illustrative of the conformity: Those schools gloss over Japan's actions in WWII, portraying Japan as the 'victim' of the nuclear weapons, disregarding the lives saved by Hirohito finally deciding enough of his subjects had died.
A visiting Japanese business acquaintance, learning of my interest in WWII from a third party, was pleased to hand me a monograph he had written which, it seemed, was widely distributed in the Japanese school system. In it, he made the claim that the Bataan Death March was simply a result of a lack of trucks to carry the American and PI POWS!
I was stationed in Japan for more than two years, loved the place, still love the food, but a dose of realism is always desired.
A lack of trucks did figure into the Bataan death march - the Japanese high command figured the time to move the prisoners of war using captured American trucks, then took away the trucks to move Japanese troops and supplies around the island, but did not change the schedule for the prisoner movement. So Japanese troops were ordered to make the prisoners walk the route on a schedule based on truck movements, and resorted to sadism and killing the laggards in an attempt to comply.
But that doesn't mean that it wasn't the fault of the Japanese commanders. They took away the trucks. They did not change the prisoner movement schedule to conform to reality. They never gave adequate rations or medical care to prisoners. Long before any invasion of the Philippines was planned, they designed a vicious troop training program to school their troops in sadism, then immersed them in anti-American propaganda. They deliberately taught their soldiers to hate everyone, but especially Americans, and should not have been surprised when these troops acting as prisoner guards used every excuse to mistreat and murder the prisoners.
Nor food nor water for the 'march', and shot those who could no longer continue.
Pro-Tip: You can uphold Libertarianism with the sit-rep of every nation. That's not "complicated."
And if you're younger than 60 and think they/them are talking bull shit, I suggest reading the Gulag Archipelago. Read the abridged version unless you have a lot of time on your hands.
Thanks for the excellent post. I applaud your characterization of Boehm.
"Unlike Mr Boehm, I actually have a memory of life not just before Twitter, but life before the internet". I applaud your
Maybe we should worry about the shit that sucks in the US first? The world is a big, nasty place full of things that suck.
One of the things that infuriates me about western coverage of Putin is that so much of it comes down to "he's undemocratic! He's been in power for so long! That's why America should oppose Russia!"
What western government hasn't remained friendly with dictators far... FAR worse than Putin because it was within our geo-strategic interests?
Yup, and almost all of it is self-inflicted. Mystical bigot partisans want the Political Kleptocracy to violate girls' panties in hopes of brainwashable Hitlerjugent within US borders. The other looters are itching to have some altruistic loot stick to their fingers on its way through contractors pretending to help foreigners. Ukraine needs one neutron bomb to pop above that reactor complex out East with a strong wind blowing north toward Moscow. That unequal but apposite reaction just might break the Rooskies of licking dictator boots.
I'm putting the Shimmer Floor Wax on my strawberry shortcake and saying it could all be better everywhere. Rational minds can do that.
And, sadly, of how relatively powerless the United States is to fix the mess that Russian President Vladimir Putin has made.
Is there a San Francisco of Russia where people shit in the streets?
Shitting on the streets is proof that we've decriminalized effectively.
It couldn't be more indicative of the insanity of our society in ruin than the fact that you need to follow your dog with gloves and a plastic bag to pick up and dispose of his crap, while walking past marginally sane drug addicts with needles sticking out of their arms, taking a state-sanctioned crap on the sidewalk you just cleaned.
>>It is a well-timed reminder of how much Russia sucks.
and Ukraine is a thugocracy. there have literally been zero days during my time on earth when Russia didn't suck ... unless you are Ted Kennedy ... or Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton or John Brennan or Obama
Don't forget Bernie Sanders.
"Alexei Navalny" is a Russian phrase that translates to "Jeffrey Epstein".
"Clinton" has one more letter than "Putin"...
As if Biden even knows who Navalny is. And I’m so jaded from the last few years, Navalny’s death feels a little too timely. Meanwhile, China’s deleting and re-educating and slave laboring the Uyghurs on an industrial scale but Reason gets apoplectic any time certain American politicians want to “do something” about it.
Biden doesn't know who his own kids are, except the one he molested in the shower.
Biden may not know who Navalny is, but he'd like to see the same thing happen to his major opponent, in this country...and his minions are doing their best to make it happen.
I obtained a copy of the coroner's report on Navalny's death. Here it is:
"It is terrible what happened to Alexei Navalny. While standing in his cell, he developed a nose bleed after a mild tap with a sledge hammer. Bleeding profusely, we attempted to stem loss of blood using a towel placed over his nose and mouth. It required great pressure on the towel to stop the blood. By a remarkable and strange coincidence, Navalny's heart stopped at the same time that the flow of blood stopped."
So, his death was an unavoidable accident.
Accidentally brutally cut his own head off while shaving.
Alexei Navalny: I'm dead !
Yevgeny Prigozhin: First time ?
A Russian colleague of mine displeased Putin's outfit 39 years ago, and he's still dead.
They're not blaming the Clintons.
I can't think of a single problem of any significance that the Federal government has fixed in the last 40 years. What would lead anyone to entertain the idea that it can "fix the mess that Putin has made in Russia" whatever that even means?
Where’s Tuck’s Pulitzer Prize?
He just put Walter Duranty to shame !
Stalin personally signed hundreds of death warrants a day at the height of the purges. Was stuffing the gulags And genociding millions of Ukrainians, all while Duranty was doing his bit to explicitly valorize the noble socialist experiment.
Tucker was surprised that a 2nd world strongman who offed a few journalists and political opponents maintained a nice subway system, explicitly to point out just how sucky American socialists are at basic societal maintenance.
But you go ahead and make your false equivalencies.
If Carlson was surprised that a dictatorial regime can maintain order then he's obviously no where near as smart as he (and his fans) thinks he is.
So long as you ignore the context of everyone in the American political chattering class talking about what a rundown shithole Russia is since at least Sochi. Or since the CRUSHING sanctions that totally crushed the Russians. Usually the same political chattering classes who have pushed everything currently making our own shithole cities even worse.
Or if you just want to deflect more from Tuckers actual point.
Here is a partial list of Putin critics or opponents who have magically died or been targeted over the last few decades:
Feb 2024- Alexei Navalny - Russian opposition leader (was also poisoned in 2020, but survived)
August 2023- Yevgeny Prigozhin - Russian mercenary leader who challenged Putin (bomb)
Sept 2022- Ravil Maganov - Chairman of national oil company Lukoil. fell from sixth-floor window at the Moscow Central Clinical Hospital".
Aug 2019- Zelimkhan Khangoshvili- aid to Chechen president Aslan Maskhadov (shot in Berlin by FSB agent)
Sept 2018- Pyotr Verzilov- activist (poisoned)
March 2018- Sergei Skripal- Russian military intelligence officer and his daughter (poisoned in the UK
by FSB)
Feb 2015- Boris Nemtsov - politician -(shot near the Kremlin)
July 2009- Natalya Estemirova - human rights activist kidnapped and shot
Nov 2006- Alex Litvineko - (former agent poisoned and killed in London after revealing Putin was behind the 1999 apartment bombings in Moscow)
Oct 2006- Anna Politkovskaya- journalist - (murdered in her elevator on Putin’s bday, had previously been arrested and poisoned)
March 2005 Aslan Maskhadov - President of Chechnya - grenade
July 2003- Yuri Shchekochikhin - Yuri Shchekochikhin -(poisoned)
April 2003- Sergei Yushenkov - politician (shot outside his home)
March 2005 Aslan Maskhadov – President of Chechnya – grenade
That little incident in a movie theater in 2002 might have had something to do with that.
I'm not going to feel bad for a bunch of Chechens, either. A lot of those assholes went to fight for ISIS a decade ago.
Yes, Russia is worse than the U.S. Yes, Putin is far worse than Biden. But there is a price for opposing empire. Julian Assange has paid that price and is still paying. The U.S. government effectively killed Jim Larkin, driving him to suicide after a 6-year prosecution. It's poised to kill Michael Lacey, whose newspapers fought corruption and abuse of power, winning 3,800 writing awards in the process. Lacey will be sentenced May 1. He could get 20 years as part of a federal witchhunt. He's 75 and could die in prison. So, the U.S. is better, but still very, very bad.
Let's not forget Seth Rich.
Assange has yet to even see the inside of a US courtroom, so it's a bit premature to lay his predicament at the feet of the US. Every day he's spent "confined" has been either due to violating ordinary UK laws or to his self-imprisonment in a futile attempt to avoid justice. If he does ever get to trial in the US, I suspect he will only get convicted of the computer hacking charge.
The Backpage prosecution is shameful, but it has nothing to do with politics. It was Donald Trump's very own DoJ which charged Larkin and Lacey with federal crimes, although Biden's DoJ has opted to continue the prosecution (despite the mistrials).
The US is far from perfect, but its level of corruption is magnitudes less severe than a thugocracy like Russia.
I'd disagree with you on Assange. The CIA and Trump admin discussed assassinating/kidnapping him. He's had good reason to fear for his life. In 2019, he got 50 weeks for violating UK bail act. So the only thing keeping him in prison now is U.S. extradition case and indictment here.
As for Lacey/Larkin, it has a lot to do with politics. The indictment never would have happened if not for John and Cindy McCain. But I'd agree larger forces are at work in this 6-year-and-counting prosecution. Bottom line: if you defy the U.S. government, even if you are in the right, you will be made to pay. It's worse in Russia? Yeah, but it's worse in Iran, Saudi Arabia, China, etc., etc. Matter of degree.
Assange made his own bed, as they say (not to mention sleeping in it--for seven years he's not going to get credit for). He arguably did "journalism", but he also arguably did assist with the hacking, which is a crime. Therefore, there is adequate probable cause to extradite him, arrest him and put him on trial in the US. The UK has a treaty with the US to extradite criminal suspects like Assange, and there are very few reasons why the UK should not comply with their obligations. I'm less convinced about the Espionage Act charges, and suspect they will eventually be dropped or he will be acquitted on those charges.
I agree, and it goes to show that "democracies" are no less corrupt than authoritarian regimes.
America may be less "corrupt" than Russia, but that is because America has far more power. If the UN were headquartered in St. Petersburg and Russia ran it, I'm pretty sure the tables would be reverse. "Rule of law" means "rule of whoever can make the laws," and since America makes international law almost without impediment from other nations, that means it can legitimize its own use of power, rather than resort to "corruption."
TL;DR American "exceptionalism" is a lie.
"And, sadly, of how relatively powerless the United States is to fix the mess that Russian President Vladimir Putin has made."
Why on earth would the US have any interest in 'fixing the mess' which the Russian voters chose?
Because the Russians have nukes, maybe?
Nukes they may want to deploy in orbit? (https://www.reuters.com/world/what-is-space-based-nuclear-weapon-us-says-russia-is-developing-2024-02-15/)
Yes, Russia is famous for its "free and fair" elections.
Nothing like the wholesale corruption of US elections!
At least they have the pretense of them. I’m sure the last “free and fair election” you guys consider to have taken place in Russia was 1996, when the State Department interfered to absolutely absurd degrees to get that drunken idiot Yeltsin in office.
Zelensky isn’t even bothering with that these days.
Ukraine is at war--with a much stronger neighbor which has a nasty habit of carving off bits of its neighbors' territory for its own use. Russia currently occupies 20% of Ukraine, and millions of Ukrainians are out of the country.
It is certainly possible to hold elections under martial law, but it is not easy and it would not be cheap. I don't blame him for putting off elections while the war is still raging, but that is obviously not something he can justify forever.
The implication here is that the US somehow has jurisdiction to "fix" every "problem" we perceive on the planet.
Newsflash: the unipolar world has ended. Maybe we should consider autarky. You only need about 2 aircraft carriers for that, rather than 10. It's a lot cheaper, and better for your people.
"Carlson raved about the beauty of the Moscow subway system "
We have Stalin to thank for that. Stalin also did time in an extremely remote corner of the arctic. Under Czarist exile between 1913 and 1917. It's arguably the high point of Stalin's life in terms of living a decent, productive and happy life. He got along well with the government over seer, and spent most of his time hunting and fishing with the native Siberian tribespeople. He gained their trust by administering medicine and teaching literacy. He also took up with a 14 year old girl (of legal age in Czarist Russia). They had a child which unfortunately didn't survive. Monuments and statues commemorating his stay were built in the village where he lived but unfortunately were destroyed during the Khrushchev regime.
So he made the trains run on time and all else is forgiven?
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
"Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."
After all, who could imagine America attempting to imprison an opposition candidate?
Let's not be like Boehm and forget Julian Assange or the journalists covering J6 being tossed in prison for reporting, bad for his narrative after all.
Which journalists are you speaking of?
Let me guess. Here’s the part where you either deny there were any “journalists” arrested on J6 because of their lack of “credentials”, or you’re just sealioning and you won’t respond when you’re given names.
No, I just had not heard there were any "journalists" arrested as part of J6. That's simply not been a part of the "hostages" narrative as far as I know.
These boards give me so much opportunity to learn new things!
A blaze and an infowars reporter just off the top of my head. And many (like the guy who filmed the Ashley Babbitt shooting) who claimed to be. Claims that the state media immediately scoffed at before any trials even happened. Often the same outlets who cried foul against anyone filming being molested by police in any way during left wing riots and demonstrations.
Okay, I searched on "Blaze reporter and J6" and learned about Steve Baker, which led to an AP article stating that at least 8 people charged in connection with J6 have identified themselves as journalists or documentary filmmakers. Baker has apparently not been charged (after being told he would be charged imminently).
Owen Shroyer is another one mentioned. Protesting and journalizing at the same time was his excuse for violating a deferred prosecution agreement he had signed after he had "interrupted a congressional hearing in 2019".
Being a "journalist" doesn't allow you to commit crimes, just as Julian Assange's arguable status does not excuse him from computer hacking charges.
For that reason, I don't really care if you've got your own show on MSNBC/Xitter, or you're just a rando waving a smart phone. There is no "credential" that says you're immune from arrest and prosecution, if indeed you engaged in criminal activity.
And how would you define "journalist"?
Tsk tsk SJ, everyone knows that "journalists" are agents of the State. None of the J6 reporters were registered as state agents, therefore they do not have the moral or legal cover of the Ministry of Truth. Hence, they are not "journalists" in the strict sense of the word -- meaning, the only sense of the word that matters when your enemy is the global crime syndicate misnomered as "The United States of America."
Good job! Now do China.
What an utterly pathetic commentary. Navalny died in prison at the hands (indirectly) of Putin, and that's symptomatic of tyranny? While brazenly, we have citizens who were attempting to save democratic choice in elections on 1/6 in jail without charges, we have Epstein "hanging himself" - utterly preposterous - in jail rather than those whose skeletons he knew well be at risk of exposure. Kleptocracy? You have an influence-peddling capo infesting the oval office, with blatant transfers of large sums of money to everyone in his family by foreign dignitaries and agents. You have an unprecedented witch hunt attempting to ruin a former president whose only real sin was not going along with the crooks that run Washington DC - including massive fabrications of misdeeds from the day he announced he was running for office - and now to ruin him financially, ALL EXPLICITLY ADMITTED beforehand by the witch hunters, to the public. The Democrat party makes Vladimir Putin look like a choir boy. We're ruing that we can't do anything about Putin? How about trying to do something about OUR FBI, CIA, DoJ, President, Bureaucracy, Dept. of "Homeland Security" and most of the heads of the Biden cartel? We can't clean up our own house; we're supposed to lament not being able to clean up Putin's? Who does this writer think he's kidding, and what planet is he on that he can't see what is in his lap, on fire, with bells ringing? My God - is he vying for naif of the year award? Absurd - totally absurd.
The new "gsteele dossier" has been released.
I don't remember anyone screaming "tyranny" when Epstein VERY conveniently died in prison.
Whether he "killed himself" or not is irrelevant. Aaron Schwartz killed himself, too.
The point is that the Orwellian totalitarian apparatus run out of DC can with complete impunity either kill people, or make them want to kill themselves, whenever they become inconvenient or irritating to it. This includes US presidents, as in the case of JFK.
A rather asinine and myopic article from someone who needs to buy a mirror. Russia doesn’t suck - just its dictator. He imprisoned a political rival using his legal system to trump up charges and arrest him for, among other things, protesting and insurrection. Sound familiar? Does the USA suck because our government holds political prisoners who die in prison? Don’t believe me? What would you call someone being held in a harsh prison for years without trial for the terrible crimes of ‘parading,’ and trespassing. Several have died in jail awaiting trial. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Libertarian private individuals can throw stones scatter-gun style in all directions.
Honestly, I don't think Putin "sucks." He is more like Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt than Americans realize or care to admit.
You can disagree with his take on history, but what you have to admit is that most people criticizing him have no take on history at all. They simply are completely ignorant, and think whatever their regime press tells them to think.
Premise: democracy good, authoritarianism bad.
Does anyone care to actually examine this premise?
By historical analysis, democracy is no more stable nor more productive of progress than authoritarianism.
In addition, nearly all belligerents in the devastating wars of the 20th century were democracies, including the regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, the Bolsheviks etc.
Henry Maine’s “Popular Government” (published in 1885) is a good read for anyone open-minded about this question.
The age of Democracy is the age of democide. Anyone who is pro-democracy must face this fact, and defend "democracy" from the charge of waging endless war and killing tens of millions of people for ideological reasons.
I agree here. "Democracy" is actually rule by whomever can whip up or whip down a mob.
Alexi Navalny sadly lost a battle with Putin the Mob Jockey.
For a good example of "democratic" propaganda exposed, read H. L. Mencken's takedown of Lincoln's fraudulent "Gettysburg address." It is in his "Prejudices," Third Series. You can still find first editions online for like $25.
Weaponizing the judicial branch is a timely reminder of how much the US sucks.
Why would you not weaponize the most powerful branch?
The US "democracy" is in fact a system of judicial supremacy. 9 or 12 men (SCOTUS) make decisions that no one has the legal power to challenge.
All governments must operate in essentially this way, no matter whether they are popular ("democracies.") There's a power center that is one man or a few men, and no one can challenge it.
Deny this? Please provide a single counter-example.
To "weaponize" something is simply to use it in a way that is, while legitimate, hated by your opponents.
What alternative is there, as long as every man desires power? And how will you keep men from desiring power? As Heidegger finally concluded: is there anything other than a god that can save us?
"Why would you not weaponize the most powerful branch?"
Perhaps because you recognize that the constitution might protect you if you lose power?
"To “weaponize” something is simply to use it in a way that is, while legitimate, hated by your opponents."
Legitimate? How is using government power against one's enemies necessarily legitimate? It's not just hated by opponents, it's abuse of power, objectivrly.
20 years ago I wouldn't have minded this sort of statement and would have agreed.
Now?
Sure Russia sucks. And Ukraine more. But there we are 'fighting for democracy' in a place that isn't one.
USA and my country of Canada both suck. We're hardly any better anymore.
At least not relative to our blowhard rhetoric about 'freedom and liberty.
I honestly didn't think in my lifetime that Russia, of all countries, would be the last bastion in Europe or the FVEY nations against the marxist menace. I figured they'd limp along like Cuba has for all these decades, or be some weird construct like China, which resembles the ancient mandarin administrative systems while continuing to spout Marxist shibboleths.
The New Left did a fantastic job of capturing these cultural institutions, but the problem for these people is that there are still enough people on the right in about 30-40% of the population to cause them problems. Hence, why you see such manic efforts to suppress anything critical of these cultural marxist regimes. It's honestly pretty sad that it's going to take a full-blown conflict to break that hold and get things back to the general post-WW2 consensus.
It’s definitely getting weird with how bent the west has become. Between the globalist Fabian communizing and the sucking real hard at the world police gig, it’s getting flat out embarrassing.
When you view these people as religious zealots, their actions make a lot more sense. These are the same subversives painting themselves as patriots on one side of their mouth, while claiming the US should be abolished out of the other.
It basically isn't any different than what happened in Rome with Christianity, and didn't take nearly as much time. The center-right, notably, is simply parroting the leftist status quo now, showing they have no actual principle other than obeying whoever is in power. If MAGA actually took over things completely, they'd start defending those positions with the same limp-wristed gusto they are the left liberal consensus right now.
The real geopolitical question of the 21st century is whether popular governments are any more effective or desirable than authoritarian governments.
The propaganda (in the West) has for centuries answered this question for “democracy.” But the answer was always a lie, from the time of the Jacobins and even earlier.
My prediction is that “democracy” is not long for this planet, and that’s a good thing. There will be much hand-wringing, wailing and gnashing of teeth among the liberal Commentariat, but when America’s “democracy” fails spectacularly, it will be as if Jesus Christ himself professed atheism. People will simply stop believing.
We will abandon our dysgenic obsession with “equality” once and for all, and that’s a good thing. Future historians will look back on the Age of Equality the way we look back on the superstitions of the Middle Ages, or the Salem witch trials.
The propaganda (in the West) has for centuries answered this question for “democracy.” But the answer was always a lie, from the time of the Jacobins and even earlier.
John Adams wasn't wrong when he said that the American form of government only worked in a nation of "moral and religious" people, as was understood at the time to be, at the very least, believing in an afterlife with eternal consequences for the sinful. It's an Roman-inspired document that can't survive the constant self-criticism of Rousseauian leftism.
"The real geopolitical question of the 21st century is whether popular governments are any more effective or desirable than authoritarian governments."
Authoritarian governments are more desireable if one likes being force fucked up the ass by government with no recourse. You like authoritarianism? Maybe you'd like the Holodomor or the Great Leap Forward or the Cultural Revolution or the European Holocaust.
"more effective"?
More effective at what? Murdering people? Oppressing people?
Authoritarisnism is great so long as I'm the authority, but not if you are. Because I know what's best for you (and me); but you don't know what's best for you or me. So be a good little subject of authoritarisnism and do as I tell you to do. Get that straight.
Russia does suck, about the exact same amount as Ukraine sucks. We shouldn't be supporting either one.
The degree of suckness is not comparable. Many of our strongest allies fail to protect fundamental rights, such as the right of free speech (not to mention bear arms, lol) to the same extent as the US does. By your measure, we should support no country but one which was entirely subservient and had adopted all our laws.
The most obvious difference between Russia and Ukraine is that one has invaded the other in a war of conquest (which is it winning), which has security implications for our NATO allies as well as for world peace in general.
The US is arguably faced with a choice: defend Ukraine now, or defend directly against Russia later. Your answer is the ostrich's.
Go check out virtually any news story about the Ukraine prior to the invasion and three themes will hit you: corruption, Nazis, sex trafficking.
Learn something about NATO’s fuckery preceding 2014 and after in Russias back yard. Even if they’re wrong, Russia has infinitely more reason to get involved in Ukraine than we did in Iraq. So I’m not sure where the moral ground is so clear here.
And there’s no instant moral good guy or bad guy because of an invasion. Unless you think Vietnam were the baddies for attacking the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.
And if the Ukraine conflict has proved anything it’s that there will be no blitzkrieg on Europe by Russia any time soon. And that our shitty economic and energy policies are twice as dangerous to us as Putin.
Please explain how man has any fundamental “rights,” including the “right” to “free speech.”
By what philosophy do you claim such “rights?”
“Rights” are invented out of whole cloth. Unless you have a god to grant them, what authority do you appeal to?
The American founders claimed their rights came from God, the ultimate lawgiver. Now that God is dead, who will give you your rights?
Nature does not care about “rights.” If a law gives you a right, then by the power of the lawgiver, you have that right. Otherwise, you do not. “Natural rights” are a farce.
"Please explain how man has any fundamental “rights,” including the “right” to “free speech.”..."
I was born; that's quite enough. Explain why you assume rights are somehow 'granted'.
'Please explain how man has any fundamental “rights,” including the “right” to “free speech.”'
It's called the Reflexive Property of logic - If A = B then B = A. If you initiate force against me to shut me up or whatever, then you have no logical or rational grounds to protest if I use force to resist or do the same to you.
Please explain to us how government has any rights to do anything at all. If you or I as humans have no rights, since the government is comprised of humans no different than you or I, then how does the government have any more right to exercise power than you or I have as humans have? It's called the Transitive Property of logic - if A = C and B = A then B = C. If (A) the government can (C) excercise power over the other (in this case, the people), since we the people (B) are humans the same as government (A), then we (B) have the same right (C) to excercise power over the other (in this case, the government). It's the laws of nature that justify freedom, specifically the laws of logic and reason.
P.S., “defend Ukraine now” or “defend… against Russia later” is a false choice.
It assumes either that Russia desires world domination, including of the Western hemisphere, or else that Europe is more appropriately a sphere of influence of the United States, an ocean away, than of Russia.
Which of these two absurd claims are you making? If neither, then what does the US have to “defend” from Russia?
The unipolar world has ended. Fasten your seatbelts. The big question is whether the US will accede to this new world, or destroy itself trying to prevent its inevitable arrival. If the lesson of Lucifer is any guide (better first in Hell, than second in Heaven) things do not look good for the future of the U.S. I do not think the western progressive fanatics, which have their base in the United States, can countenance a catastrophic loss of power and influence. They may very well prefer "peris mundi."
I did say the US is "arguably" faced with a choice... Did they not teach you what that word means in your language school?
Russia currently only desires domination of "its" part of the world. Unfortunately, that part includes several countries and millions of people who do not wish to be dominated by Russia. That's a big problem for them, but indirectly also for us.
Zelensky is a buffon and a queer of the US Deep State .
How about this: Like love, power sucks -- unless you're in it.
Navalny ? This bastard was the US Deep State puppet and enemy of the Russian people who worked for CIA to destroy Russia. Russia doesn't suck , it is God's land . President Putin is the iron man and the wide majority of the Russians support him .
You don't do sarcasm very well.
Fact is: nobody in US government gives a f*ck about the Ukrainian people, the Russian people, Navalny, the US people, or any other people. What they care about is power and money.
You need to ask yourself why among the hundreds of politicians murdered around the world every year, Navalny gets so much press. The answer is simple: he serves a propaganda purpose, namely to get people to support sending more billions to the US MIC and the corrupt government in Ukraine.
The answer is simple: he serves a propaganda purpose, namely to get people to support sending more billions to the US MIC and the corrupt government in Ukraine.
Correct, and for the same reasons that the DC mandarin/media classes were tard-raging about Kashoggi after he got clapped.
Hear, hear! 100%
https://www.salon.com/2017/04/02/dictator-vs-democrat-not-quite-russian-opposition-leader-alexey-navalny-is-no-progressive-hero/
Jeffrey Epstein's Death [in a US prison] Is a Timely Reminder of How Much America Sucks
Discuss.
That was the first thing that popped into my head when I read this drivel!
Vladimir Putin's early treatment of Alexei Navalny reminds me of Joe Biden's treatment of Donald Trump.
Democrats are saving "Democracy" by utterly destroying it.
You do know that it was Trump who did the attempted coup? That is kinda destroying democracy way more then whatever fantasy you have about Biden.
It’s not a “coup” when you’re already in power. It’s an autogolpe, or self-coup.
Kind of like the one Napoleon pulled off, or Xi lately in China. Ir Lincoln.
The real question is: why is this a bad thing? Because it’s “illegal?” Lincoln’s war was illegal, also, despite Whig history and commentary to the contrary.
People tend only to despise “authoritarianism” or “corruption” when it militates to ends they dislike. When it militates to their own ends? They don’t mind it at all. Again, the premiere example for Americans is Lincoln, bloodthirsty founder of the DC imperium. Check out the size of his shrine next time you’re in the imperial center.
Fun fact: biggest, deadliest, most violent draft riots in U.S. history? Were in New York City in 1863, when Lincoln was drafting people to die in order to subjugate the South.
"subjugate the South"
Yeah, like abolishing slavery. The South deserved to be subjugated.
The South was forced back into the Union with all the rights and powers of the other states of the union. They were no more "subjugated" than any other states.
Fuck off and die, lying pile of lefty shit.
You do know that it was Trump who did the attempted coup?
There was no "attempted coup". There was a peaceful demonstration that agents provocateurs turned into a trespass.
That is kinda destroying democracy way more then whatever fantasy you have about Biden.
Mao's China was a democracy. Turns out that most democracies are evil and totalitarian. Biden and the Democrats want that kind of democracy for the US.
"Mao’s China was a democracy."
When were there ever free elections open to non-Communists in Red China?
No, Democrats are not "destroying democracy" at all. They are creating the same kind of democracy that Mao envisioned.
Democracy just means that political power originates with the people. Democracy does not mean that a society is free, or just, or tolerant. In fact, most democratic societies are authoritarian or totalitarian.
'Even so, any silver lining here is exceedingly thin, because it doesn't take long for a deeper reality to become apparent: That the United States, for all its military and economic might, can't do much to fix the mess that Putin has made in Russia.'
Why on God's green Earth is Eric Boehm a 'reporter' at a Libertarian magazine? This is a idiotic Op-Ed with no facts, arguing that the US should be more involved in a foreign nation's internal governance. Boehm is not a Libertarian in any way to write an Op-Ed like this.
You say Trump is a liar, yet you’re making him out to be some fucking Saint Sebastian turned into a human pin cushion?
And now you’re defending banks–underwritten by taxpayers via the FDIC and FSLIC–fudging and apple-polishing with numbers that represent Dollars and ultimately lives?
I guess Aryan Pure Supermen also poo-poo banking and actuarial principles as well. Just too vulgar and degenerate for proponents of Blood And Soil, right?
Again, Fuck Off, Nazi!
Again, Fuck Off, Nazi!
Worth saying twice!
“TheReEncogitationer 15 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Racists and Antisemites don’t care whether the targets of their hatred go away mad or go away to prosperity. They just want the targets of their hatred to go away. There is no negotiating with mentalities like that.
Reply
Rob Misek 14 hours ago
Is that why you end every one of your replies to me with “fuck off nazi”?
Hahaha”
It never gets old. Hahaha
Per hour income of $120-$180. That’s a lot of money. You must give handjobs two at a time (i.e., using both hands, for the math-impaired reader). You obviously have better than average coordination! You must be a happy fellow. Inquiring minds want to know - are you always able to dodge the flying results of your manual efforts?
In all fairness, Jody could be a she or Xe/Xer, and that's the beauty of ambidexterity. You use both hands and never miss a stroke. Nice work if you can get it!
🙂
😉
No shit, Schickelgruber! There's no rational debate or negotiation with racist and Antisemites like you! There is only derision!
Fuck Off, Nazi!
Hahaha
So, Herr Misek, are you pressing the "Hot Hail" button as you laugh and "play with things awhile...before annihilation"?
Well, I say: Death To Ming and Fuck Off, Nazi!
"Hahaha"
Nazi shitstain response when busted.
Fuck off and die, asshole.